Evaluation of chest pain in the ED: factors affecting triage decisions

The emergency physician's (EP) fast and correct diagnosis of patients with chest pain is crucial for preventing inappropriate discharge and dire consequences. To determine which factors affect admission decisions in the ED, we studied epidemiologic characteristics of both discharged and admitted patients, and the percentage of discharged patients who returned to the ED with acute myocardial infarction. The study included 185 patients seen in the ED because of chest pain between July 1 and 31, 1997 (every third day not included). Ninety patients were admitted: 36.7% were admitted for "observation of chest pain" and 63.3% met the criteria for active coronary heart disease. A form was used to collect personal data, medical history, risk factors, clinical examination, electrocardiogram interpretation, laboratory data, and admittance decision. EPs' diagnosis of cardiac chest pain demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.4%, a specificity of 73.4%, and a positive predictive value of 63.3%. Sensitivity for diagnosing acute myocardial infarct was 100%, with no erroneous discharges. The EP's ability to integrate the medical history information, including risk factors and pain characteristics, had a marked influence on the admittance decision. Efforts to reduce missed diagnoses are warranted.     

Emergency Department CK-MB: A Predictor of Ischemic Complications

ABSTRACT
Objective : To demonstrate that a positive CK-MB in the emergency department (ED) predicts an increased risk for complications of myocar-dial ischemia in patients admitted to the hospital for evaluation of chest pain.
Methods : 53 academic and community hospital EDs participated in this prospective observational cohort analysis of 5,120 patients with chest pain without ST-segment elevation on the initial ED 12-lead electrocardiogram. All patients were admitted for evaluation of chest pain in one of the participating hospitals as part of the National Cooperative CK-MB Project. Patients were stratified by whether or not they had an elevated CK-MB level in the ED. CK-MB measurements were made on ED presentation and two hours later. Patient medical records were reviewed for inpatient diagnoses—myocardial infarction (MI) or other diagnosis —and for ischemic complications—cardiac-related death, recurrent or delayed in-hos-pital MI, significant ventricular arrhythmias, new conduction defects, congestive heart failure, and cardiogenic shock.
Results : 369 (7.2%) of the 5,120 patients had MI. The proportion of patients with any complication in the MI group was 24%, while the complication rate in the non-MI group was 0.4%. In all patients, regardless of final diagnosis, the relative risk of any complication was 16.1 (95% CI 11.0–23.6) in those with a positive ED CK-MB versus negative ED CK-MB patients. Similarly, the relative risk of death was 25.4 (95% CI 10.8— 60.2) in positive ED CK-MB versus negative ED CK-MB patients.
Conclusions : Multicenter data support the hypothesis that CK-MB measurements can help risk-stratify ED chest pain patients whose initial ECGs are without diagnostic ST-segment elevation.     

ED evaluation of infants after an apparent life-threatening event

The objective of this study was to determine the rate of positive ED diagnostic evaluations and significant interventions during the hospitalization of infants after an apparent life-threatening event (ALTE). The study was performed at a single, tertiary care children's hospital. Patients under 6 months of age were identified for a potential ALTE from the ED chief complaint log. The charts of patients meeting the definition of an ALTE were abstracted for data pertaining to the patient's history, physical examination, ED diagnostic evaluation, and admission. The yield of the ED diagnostic evaluation and hospitalization was noted. A positive ED evaluation was defined as a diagnostic intervention that resulted in a specific treatment for a defined condition. Significant medical interventions were derived from a validated instrument assessing the risk of admission for pediatric patients presenting to an ED. Such interventions included, but were not limited to, parenteral antibiotics for documented infections, supplemental oxygen, endotracheal intubation, airway suctioning, and intensive-care unit admission. Over a 5-year period with 253,408 patient visits, 523 patents met the initial search criteria for a potential ALTE. From this group, 483 charts were reviewed (92.4%) and 150 patients met the definition for an ALTE. The mean age of the patients was 61.7 days and 115 (76.7%) were admitted. Of the patients with an ALTE, 122 patients had ED diagnostic tests performed and three had a positive result (2.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 0.5-7.0). The rate of significant medical interventions among admitted patients was 7.% (9 of 115, 95% CI, 3.6-14.3). No patients with a positive ED diagnostic evaluation were discharged from the ED. Risk factors for significant medical interventions included prematurity, a positive medical history, and age >60 days. The overall rate of either positive ED diagnostic evaluations or significant medical interventions during hospitalizations of infants after an ALTE is low. A majority of these patients can be best managed with a limited ED diagnostic evaluation and a period of observation.     

Drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in the ED: Analysis of a high-risk population

A study was undertaken to determine the potential for adverse drug interactions (ADIs) and drug-disease interactions (DDIs) in a high-risk population of emergency department (ED) patients and to characterize drug-drug and drug-disease interactions in terms of percentage of patients at risk from existing drug regimens, percentage of patients at risk from ED treatment, relation between number of drugs and potential for interactions, types of drugs and diseases posing greatest potential for interaction, and the differences in a general versus community hospital population with respect to these parameters. Records of 205 consecutive patients, 111 from a general hospital teaching facility ED (Facility 1) and 94 from a community hospital ED (Facility 2) were retrospectively reviewed. The records of all patients receiving three or more medications and all patients older than 50 years of age receiving two or more medications were analyzed by two computer programs for the presence of potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. A total of 226 potential ADIs were found in 89 patients (47%), with 50% of ADIs being related to ED treatment. A total of 94 potential DDIs were found in 44 patients (21%), with 34% of DDIs being related to ED treatment. The risk of an ADI rose from 13% for patients taking 2 medications to 82% for patients taking 7 or more medications. Eleven medications and four disease categories were identified as having particular potential for interactions. No significant differences were found between the general and the community hospital populations in these respects. ED patients taking three or more medications and patients older than 50 years of age taking two or more medications are at substantial risk for adverse drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. The risk is increased in patients taking particular drugs or having particular disease states.     

A Prediction Rule to Identify Low-risk Patients with Heart Failure

Objectives: To derive a prediction rule using data available in the emergency department (ED) to identify a group of patients hospitalized for the treatment of heart failure who are at low risk of death and serious complications. Methods: The authors analyzed data for all 33,533 patients with a primary hospital discharge diagnosis of heart failure in 1999 who were admitted from EDs in Pennsylvania. Candidate predictors were demographic and medical history variables and the most abnormal examination or diagnostic test values measured in the ED (vital signs only) or on the first day of hospitalization. The authors constructed classification trees to identify a subgroup of patients with an observed rate of death or serious medical complications before discharge < 2%; the tree that identified the subgroup with the lowest rate of this outcome and an inpatient mortality rate < 1% was chosen. Results: Within the entire cohort, 4.5% of patients died and 6.8% survived to hospital discharge after experiencing a serious medical complication. The prediction rule used 21 prognostic factors to classify 17.2% of patients as low risk; 19 (0.3%) died and 59 (1.0%) survived to hospital discharge after experiencing a serious medical complication. Conclusions: This clinical prediction rule identified a group of patients hospitalized from the ED for the treatment of heart failure who were at low risk of adverse inpatient outcomes. Model performance needs to be examined in a cohort of patients with an ED diagnosis of heart failure and treated as outpatients or hospitalized.     

Predicting 30 – Day outcomes in emergency department patients discharged with COVID-19

IntroductionDetermining disposition for COVID-19 patients can be difficult for emergency medicine clinicians. Previous studies have demonstrated risk factors which predict severe infection and mortality however little is known about which risk factors are associated with failure of outpatient management and subsequent admission for COVID-19 patients.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational chart review of patients who had a confirmed positive COVID-19 test collected during an ED visit between March 1, 2020 and October 11, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups based on presence or absence of a subsequent 30-day hospitalization. Clinical and demographic information were collected including chief complaint, triage vital signs and comorbid medical conditions.Results1038 patients were seen and discharged from a network ED with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test. 94 patients (9.1%) were admitted to a hospital within 30 days of the index ED visit while 944 (90.9%) were not admitted to a network hospital within 30 days. Patients that were admitted were more likely to be older (aOR = 1.04 (95% CI 1.03–1.06)), hypoxic (aOR = 2.16 (95% CI 1.14–4.10)) and tachycardic (aOR = 2.13 (95% CI 1.34–3.38)) on initial ED presentation. Preexisting hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease and malignancy were all highly significant risk factors for 30-day hospital admission following initial ED discharge (p < 0.0001).ConclusionEmergency Department providers should consider age, chief complaint, vital signs and comorbid medical conditions when determining disposition for patients diagnosed with COVID-19.     

Respiratory Isolation of Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Tuberculosis in an Inner-city Hospital

Objective : To identify clinical factors that predict which patients presenting to the ED with pneumonia will require respiratory isolation for suspected tuberculosis and to evaluate a protocol for rapid identification of patients at risk for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB). Methods : To identify potential clinical indicators of PTB, a case-control study was performed using patients admitted to an urban teaching hospital with the ED diagnosis of pneumonia (derivation sample). These predictors were then evaluated in a separate prospective observational study of 103 patients admitted to the same institution from July 1994 to February 1995. Adult patients with the admitting diagnosis of pneumonia were admitted to a respiratory isolation bed if they met 1 of the following criteria: 1) HIV-positive or unknown HIV status with a history of injection drug use; 2) chest x-ray consistent with PTB; or 3) pneumonia with 1 of the following: PPD conversion within 2 years, recent exposure to PTB, previous PTB, or hemoptysis. Patients who did not meet isolation criteria were admitted to the medical ward and had a PPD and anergy panel placed. Those who were anergic or PPD-positive were transferred to respiratory isolation. Results : Predictor variables identified during the first study phase were incorporated into the isolation guidelines noted above. Only 36 of 50 (72%) PTB patients were admitted to an isolation bed during this phase. During the second phase, 103 patients were admitted with the ED diagnosis of pneumonia-rule out PTB; 22 patients (22%) were culture-confirmed positive for PTB. The guidelines predicted PTB as follows: sensitivity, 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88–1.0); specificity, 0.14 (95% CI, 0.08–0.24); positive predictive value, 0.23 (95% CI, 0.17–0.35); and negative predictive value, 0.92 (95% CI, 0.77–1.0). The 1 patient who was not isolated was found to be anergic after 48 hours and subsequently isolated. Conclusion : Respiratory isolation guidelines for patients admitted from the ED with pneumonia were developed and validated. These guidelines provide satisfactory guidance for isolation of patients at risk for PTB in a high-PTB-prevalence population.     

Factors Associated with Adverse Events Resulting From Medical Errors in the Emergency Department: Two Work Better Than One

Background

The Emergency Department (ED) is an environment at risk for medical errors.

Objective

Our aim was to determine the factors associated with the adverse events resulting from medical errors in the ED among patients who were admitted.

Methods

This was a prospective observational study. For a 1-month period, we included all ED patients who were subsequently admitted to the medical ward. Detection of medical errors was made by the admitting physician and then validated by two experts who reviewed all available data and medical charts pertaining to the patient’s hospital stay, including the first review from the ward physician. Related adverse events resulting from medical errors were then classified by type and severity. Adverse events were defined as medical errors that needed an intervention or caused harm to the patient. Univariate analysis examined relationships between characteristics of both patients and physicians and the risk of adverse events.

Results

From 197 analyzed patients, 130 errors were detected, of these, 34 were categorized as adverse events among 19 patients (10%). Seventy-six percent of these were categorized as proficiency errors. The only factors associated with a lower risk of adverse events were the transition of care involving a handoff within the ED (0% vs. 19%; p = 0.03) and the involvement of a resident (junior doctor) in addition to the senior physician (37% vs. 67%; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

In our study, the involvement of more than one physician was associated with a lower risk of adverse events.     

Pre-Endoscopic Rockall and Blatchford Scores to Identify Which Emergency Department Patients with Suspected Gastrointestinal Bleed Do Not Need Endoscopic Hemostasis

Background

The pre-endoscopic Rockall Score (RS) and the Glasgow-Blatchford Scores (GBS) can help risk stratify patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed who are seen in the Emergency Department (ED). The RS and GBS have yet to be validated in a United States patient population for their ability to discriminate which ED patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed do not need endoscopic hemostasis.

Objective

We sought to determine whether patients who received a score of zero on either score (the lowest risk) in the ED still required upper endoscopic hemostasis during hospitalization.

Methods

Retrospective electronic medical record chart review was performed during a 3-year period (2007–2009) to identify patients with suspected upper gastrointestinal bleed by ED final diagnosis of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and related terms at a single urban academic ED. The RS and GBS were calculated from ED chart abstraction and the hospital records of admitted patients were queried for subsequent endoscopic hemostasis.

Results

Six hundred and ninety patients with gastrointestinal bleed were identified and 86% were admitted to the hospital. One hundred and twenty-two patients had an RS equal to zero; 67 (55%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 46–63%) of these patients were admitted to the hospital and 11 (16%; 95% CI 9–27%) received endoscopic hemostasis. Sixty-three patients had a GBS equal to zero; 15 (24%; 95% CI 15–36%) were admitted to the hospital and 2 (13%; 95% CI 4–38%) received endoscopic hemostasis.

Conclusions

Some patients who were identified as lowest risk by the GBS or RS still received endoscopic hemostasis during hospital admission. These clinical decision rules may be insufficiently sensitive to predict which patients do not require endoscopic hemostasis.     

Limitations of chest pain follow-up from an urban teaching hospital emergency department

Close outpatient follow-up of chest pain patients released from the emergency department (ED) has been suggested as an important means of detecting atypical presentations of cardiac ischemia. Urban teaching hospital patient populations often have limited private physician follow-up options and rely upon standard teaching hospital clinic systems. We analyzed the follow-up of 318 patients 30 or more years of age with nontraumatic chest pain released from the ED of a large urban teaching hospital. The planned disposition of the released patients was as follows: a medical clinic (136), another clinic or a private physician (76), or ED "as needed" (98); in addition, some patients left against medical advice (AMA) (8). The medical clinics received only 38% (51/136) of planned referrals. No subsequent record could be found for 13% (17/136) of referred patients. Only 17% (23/136) of referred patients were reevaluated within seven days. Two of the patients referred to medical clinics were admitted to the hospital within 24 hours for unstable angina and another was admitted from a medical clinic 16 days after ED evaluation with an acute myocardial infarction. Of patients with ED follow-up "as needed," one patient required admission for unstable angina 27 days after ED evaluation. Of the patients who left AMA, only two were reevaluated within 30 days. These findings suggest that specific measures to enhance follow-up must be instituted at urban teaching hospitals if chest pain patients are to be closely followed after ED release.     

Emergency department management of chemotherapy related febrile neutropenia: An opportunity to improve care

BackgroundFebrile neutropenia (FN) is an important oncological emergency seen in the emergency department (ED), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends risk stratification of patients with febrile neutropenia using the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) Index, with ED discharge on oral antibiotics recommended for low-risk patients.ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of FN neutropenia and medical system wide ED treatment guideline adherence.MethodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with an ICD-10 confirmed diagnosis of FN from January 2016-2019at 13 affiliated EDs within one medical system. Only cancer/chemotherapy related FN were included. Following the MASCC guidelines, we used post-hoc calculations to classify patients as low/high-risk, and compared key clinical variables (mortality, blood culture positivity, interventions).Results203 patients were found to have FN. 97.9% (184/203) received broad spectrum antibiotics, including 92% of the low-risk group (60/65). All patients were admitted, and no observed in-hospital mortality was noted in the low-risk group, meanwhile 5.1% (7/138) of the high-risk group died. 14/203 patients had positive blood cultures, none in the low-risk group.ConclusionThe prevalence of FN is low among 13 EDs that had almost 1.7 million ED visits over a 3-year period. Guideline compliance for low-risk FN was poor. All patients were admitted, and nearly all patients received IV fluids and IV antibiotics. Improving FN management to align with national guidelines represents an opportunity to improved ED care of patients with cancer by reducing unnecessary hospitalizations.     

Trends in a decade of drug abuse presentation to an inner city ED

Temporal factors on the periodic presentations has been described for many diseased states (ie, asthma, seizures, coronary attacks). We now report an analysis of factors that could affect the periodic character regarding emergency department (ED) presentation of drugs of abuse. All drugs presentations consistent with the Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) reporting program from January 1988 through December 1997 were categorized. Data collection was based on daily chart review of ED medical records from Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Hospital (Chicago, IL). Data were computer analyzed using SPSS and Pharmfit programs and analyzed for time, age, disposition, sex, and reasons for presentation and taking the drugs. During the above period, the Rush ED saw 369,770 patients of which 2,561 (0.7%) presented with a drug-related problem. The average age of men was 33. 7 + 0.29 and women 30.5 + 0.37 years. One hundred thirty-nine patients (5.4%) were under 17 years of age whereas only 72 patients (2.8%) were over 55 years of age. Cocaine was the most common drug presentation with a total of 859 visits. Seven hundred sixty-one (29. 7%) presented with an unexpected reaction, 754 (29.4%) experienced an over dosage, 135 (5.3%) had a drug withdrawal, 546 (21.3%) experienced chronic effects, 1,380 (53.9%) were drug dependent, 218 (8.5%) were suicide attempts, and the remaining 2.7% were unknown. There were 1,078 (42.2%) patients who were treated and released, 1, 394 (54.6%) who were admitted into the hospital, 74 (2.9%) left against medical advice whereas 9 patients (0.4%) died. Peak time for presentation was 5:03 PM (P =.00002). Suicide intent presentations were more likely to be women (P <.0001), older (P <.001), and present at a later time that of recreational drug use (acrophase 18:49 versus 16:39; P =.00011). Almost 90% of patients presenting to our urban ED over past 10 years with drug-related problems arrive because of drug abuse or dependency issues. ED staff should be most prepared to deal with these issues in the late afternoon.     

Anxiety and depressive disorders in an emergency department ward of a general hospital: a control study

Objective: In this study anxiety and depressive disorders were evaluated in patients admitted to an emergency department (ED) or to a medical department (MD).

Methods: The General Health Questionnaire-30 (GHQ-30) was administered to screen all patients (n = 719) consecutively admitted to an ED (n = 556) and to MD (n = 163) in a 120 day period. All GHQ-30 positive (score>4) underwent the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, a structured interview to diagnose mental disorders according to DSM-IV criteria.

Results: Subjects positive to GHQ-30 were 264 (47%) in ED and 88 (54%) in MD. A mental disorder was diagnosed in 233 ED patients (42%) and in 77 MD patients (47%) (p = 0.70). The most frequent disorders were anxiety disorders in ED patients (18.1%) and depressive disorders in MD patients (21%) (p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Anxious patients more frequently seek attention at ED, whereas patients with depressive disorders are more often observed in medical units. The improvement of quality of care, the waste of healthcare resources through unnecessary medical care, and the well known efficacy of appropriate treatments in patients with anxiety and depressive disorders make the diagnosis of these patients particularly important.

     

Delirium in Older Emergency Department Patients: Recognition, Risk Factors, and Psychomotor Subtypes

Objectives: Missing delirium in the emergency department (ED) has been described as a medical error, yet this diagnosis is frequently unrecognized by emergency physicians (EPs). Identifying a subset of patients at high risk for delirium may improve delirium screening compliance by EPs. The authors sought to determine how often delirium is missed in the ED and how often these missed cases are detected by admitting hospital physicians at the time of admission, to identify delirium risk factors in older ED patients, and to characterize delirium by psychomotor subtypes in the ED setting. Methods: This cross‐sectional study was a convenience sample of patients conducted at a tertiary care, academic ED. English‐speaking patients who were 65 years and older and present in the ED for less than 12 hours at the time of enrollment were included. Patients were excluded if they refused consent, were previously enrolled, had severe dementia, were unarousable to verbal stimuli for all delirium assessments, or had incomplete data. Delirium status was determined by using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM‐ICU) administered by trained research assistants (RAs). Recognition of delirium by emergency and hospital physicians was determined from the medical record, blinded to CAM‐ICU status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent delirium risk factors. The Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale was used to classify delirium by its psychomotor subtypes. Results: Inclusion and exclusion criteria were met in 303 patients, and 25 (8.3%) presented to the ED with delirium. The vast majority (92.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 74.0% to 99.0%) of delirious patients had the hypoactive psychomotor subtype. Of the 25 patients with delirium, 19 (76.0%, 95% CI = 54.9% to 90.6%) were not recognized to be delirious by the EP. Of the 16 admitted delirious patients who were undiagnosed by the EPs, 15 (93.8%, 95% CI = 69.8% to 99.8%) remained unrecognized by the hospital physician at the time of admission. Dementia, a Katz Activities of Daily Living (ADL) ≤ 4, and hearing impairment were independently associated with presenting with delirium in the ED. Based on the multivariable model, a delirium risk score was constructed. Dementia, Katz ADL ≤ 4, and hearing impairment were weighed equally. Patients with higher risk scores were more likely to be CAM‐ICU positive (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve = 0.82). If older ED patients with one or more delirium risk factors were screened for delirium, 165 (54.5%, 95% CI = 48.7% to 60.2%) would have required a delirium assessment at the expense of missing 1 patient with delirium, while screening 141 patients without delirium. Conclusions: Delirium was a common occurrence in the ED, and the vast majority of delirium in the ED was of the hypoactive subtype. EPs missed delirium in 76% of the cases. Delirium that was missed in the ED was nearly always missed by hospital physicians at the time of admission. Using a delirium risk score has the potential to improve delirium screening efficiency in the ED setting.     

ED hemodialysis for treatment of renal failure emergencies.

Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) are at risk for unique medical emergencies, many of which require hemodialysis for their definitive treatment. This study describes the use of emergency department (ED) hemodialysis in the management of CRF patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients who underwent ED hemodialysis at a regional dialysis center between April 1994 and September 1996. Data were collected on presenting complaint, ED diagnosis, indication for hemodialysis, ED pharmacologic treatment, ED airway management, cardiovascular stability, and disposition. Fifty episodes of ED hemodialysis were identified in 37 different patients. Presenting complaints included: shortness of breath, 38 (69%); weakness, 8 (15%); chest pain, 3 (5%); and other, 6 (11%). ED diagnoses included: congestive heart failure, 36 (65%); hyperkalemia, 13 (24%); and other, 6 (11%). Indications for hemodialysis included: cardiovascular instability, 33 (38%); respiratory distress, 22 (26%); cardiac monitoring, 16 (19%), timing, 13 (15%); and other, 2 (2%). Predialysis stabilization included: nitroglycerin, 29 (26%); sublingual captopril, 17 (15%); calcium chloride, 13 (11%); sodium bicarbonate, 12 (11%); insulin/dextrose, 11 (10%); none, 12 (11%); and other, 18 (16%). Airway support included: noninvasive pressure support ventilation (NPSV), 9 (18%); and endotracheal intubation, 6 (12%). NPSV was provided with a bilevel positive airway pressure system. Three of the endotracheal intubation patients were weaned to NPSV during dialysis, and all NPSV patients were weaned from respiratory support during their hemodialysis in the ED. Some patients had more than one problem. Sixteen patients (32%) were admitted, while 34 (68%) were discharged, including 3 NPSV patients and 22 initially unstable patients. ED hemodialysis in conjunction with additional medical care is a useful emergency medicine technique that can prevent hospital admission in patients with acute renal emergencies.     

Spectrum of acute allergic diseases in an emergency department: An evaluation of one years’ experience

Objective: There is limited available literature on the incidence of allergic diseases in ED. The objective of this study was to investigate the clinical records of patients admitted to the ED with a suspected allergic reaction. Methods: A 1 year retrospective study was carried out and data were collected from the patients’ computerized medical reports. Results: A total of 324 patients were admitted for an allergic event. Of those, 165 patients (50.9%) were female and their mean age was 55 ± 18.5 years. Diagnoses included: asthma in 100 patients (30.9%); hymenoptera allergy in 78 patients (24.1%); food allergy in 31 patients (9.5%); drug allergy in 25 patients (7.7%); and allergic conjunctivitis in 12 patients (3.7%). No diagnosis was found in the medical records of 78 patients (24.1%). Anaphylactic shock was observed in 12 patients (3.7%) with a diagnosis of food allergy (six cases), drug allergy (three cases) and hymenoptera allergy (three cases). Ninety patients (27.7%) were hospitalized in the following units: 38 in allergy unit (42.2%); 20 in intensive care unit (22.2%); 10 in pulmonary unit (11.1%); eight in the dermatology unit (8.9%); six in the internal medicine unit (6.7%); and eight in other units (8.9%). Overall, 42 patients (12.9%) were evaluated by an allergologist after ED discharge with positive allergy results in 28 cases (66.6%). Conclusions: Acute allergic diseases are not rare in ED, representing 1% of the annual visits in our series. A low rate of allergologist referral was observed. Emergency physicians must work closely with allergologists to ensure a better evaluation, long‐term care and preventive management of patients with allergic diseases admitted to the ED.     

Multicenter assessment of the revisit risk for a further drug-related problem in the emergency department in cocaine users (MARRIED-cocaine study)

Introduction and objectives. Emergency departments (EDs) in Spanish hospitals daily attend a large number of patients for adverse reactions or clinical complications resulting from cocaine use. After discharge, some of these patients revisit the ED for the same reason within a year. The objective of the present study was to quantify the rate of such revisits and identify the factors associated with them. Method. We performed a retrospective, multicenter study with cohort follow-up and without a control group, conducted in the EDs of six Spanish hospitals during 12 months (January–December 2009). We included all ED patients attended for cocaine-related symptoms who reported recent cocaine use and those with cocaine-positive urine analysis by immunoassay without declared consumption. Twelve independent variables assessed for each hospital ED were collected: sex, age, place of consumption, month, day, and time of consumption, mode of arrival at the ED, discharge diagnosis, psychiatric assessment on the ED episode, concomitant drugs, destination on discharge, and history of previous ED visits related with drug use and alcohol use. The dependent variable was a subsequent visit to the ED associated with drug use, identified using the computerized hospital admissions system. Results. The study included 807 patients, of whom 6.7% revisited the ED within 30 days, 11.9% within 3 months and 18.9% within 1 year. The variables significantly associated with ED revisits were: presence of clinical manifestations directly related to cocaine (p <?0.05), ED attendance on a working day (p <?0.05), history of ED visits related with the consumption of alcohol (p <?0.001) or drugs (p <?0.001), and the need for urgent consultation with a psychiatrist (p <?0.001), although only the last four were independent predictors in multivariate analysis. We derived a score based on these variables to predict risk of revisits (MARRIED-score, ranging from 0 to 400 points), which had a reasonably good predictive value for revisit (area under ROC of 0.75; 95% CI 0.71–0.79).