Quantitative acute leukemia cytogenetics.

Using literature data on cytogenetic abnormalities in 3,612 cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 1,551-cases of acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), we have attempted to quantify the information value of finding the typical ALL- and AML-associated chromosome aberrations. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of finding or not finding a given aberration were calculated for several diagnostic scenarios: for the differential diagnosis between ALL and AML when the patient is known to have acute leukemia, for the differential diagnosis among AML FAB subtypes in a patient with known AML, and for the differential diagnosis between ALL FAB subtypes in a patient with known ALL. The specificities were generally high, close to 1. The highest sensitivities in AML were found for +8, t(15;17)(q22;q11), t(8;21)(q22;q22), and -7 (all greater than 0.1), and in ALL for t(9;22)(q34;q11), t(4;11)(q21;q23), and +21 (again all greater than 0.1). In the AML subtypes, the highest sensitivities were 0.89 for t(15;17)(q22;q11) in M3, followed by 0.40 for t(8;21)(q22;q22) in M2, 0.30 for inv(16)(p13q22)/del(16)(q22)/t(16;16)(p13;q22) in M4, and 0.16 for t(9;11)(p21;q23) in M5. In the ALL subtypes, the highest sensitivities were 0.71 and 0.11 for t(8;14)(q24;q32) and t(8;22)(q24;q11), respectively, in L3, 0.23 for t(9;22)(q34;q11) in L2, and 0.18 and 0.13 for +21 and t(4;11)(q21;q23), respectively, in L1. The highest (1.0) positive predictive values in the AML versus ALL comparison were found for t(1;3)(p36;q21), inv(3)(q21q26), t(6;9)(p23;q34), t(7;11)(p15;p15), t(8;16)(p11;p13), t(8;21)(q22;q22), t(15;17)(q22;q11), and, as sole anomalies, for +4, +9, and +11. In the reverse comparison, ALL versus AML, positive predictive values of 1.0 were found for t(1;14)(p32-34;q11), dup(I)(q12-21q31-32), t(2;8)(p12;q24), t(8;14)(q24;q32), t/dic(9;12)(p11-12;p11-13), t(10;14)(q24;q11), and t(11;14)(p13;q11). Among the AML subgroups, the highest predictive values were: 1.0 for M3 if t(15;17), 0.91 for M2 if t(8;21), 0.86 for M4 if inv/del(16)/t(16;16), and 0.82 for M5 if t(9;11). Among the ALL subtypes, positive predictive values of greater than 0.8 were reached only for the L3-associated aberrations t(2;8) (1.0), t(8;14) (0.95), t(8;22) (0.87), and dup(I) (0.80). The highest negative predictive values were in AML 0.98 that the disease is not M3 if t(15;17) is not found, and in ALL 0.96 that the patient does not have L3 if a t(8;14) is not detected.     

Detection of rare reciprocal RUNX1 rearrangements by next‐generation sequencing in acute myeloid leukemia

Reciprocal RUNX1 fusions are traditionally found in up to 10% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, usually associated with a translocation (8;21)(q22;q22) corresponding to the RUNX1‐RUNX1T1 fusion gene. So far, alternative RUNX1 rearrangements have been reported only rarely in AML, and the few reports so far have focused on results based on cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction. Acknowledging the inherent limitations of these diagnostic techniques, the true incidence of rare RUNX1 rearrangements may be underestimated. In this report, we present two cases of adult AML, in which we detected rare RUNX1 rearrangements not by conventional cytogenetics but rather by next‐generation panel sequencing. These include t(16;21)(q24;q22)/RUNX1‐CBFA2T3 and t(7;21)(p22;q22)/RUNX1‐USP42, respectively. In both patients the AML was therapy‐related and associated with additional structural and numerical alterations thereby conferring bad prognosis. This is in line with previous reports on rare RUNX1 fusions in AML and emphasizes the clinical importance of their detection. In summary, our report not only confirms the clinical utility of NGS for diagnostics of rare reciprocal rearrangements in AML in a real‐life scenario but also sheds light on the variety and complexity within AML. It further emphasizes the need for collection of additional cases for deepening insights on their clinical meaning as well as their frequency.     

Molecular cytogenetic investigations in a novel complex variant of t(8;21)(q22;q22) with ins(15;21)(q15;q22.2q22.3) in a patient with AML-M2 subtype

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous disease characterized by the aberrant proliferation of myeloid stem cells, reduced apoptosis and blockage in cellular differentiation. The present report describes the results of hematological, cytogenetic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in a 25-year-old man diagnosed with AML-M2. Cytogenetic as well as FISH analysis revealed a complex translocation involving four chromosomes, with the karyotype 45,−Y,der(X)t(X;8)(p21;q22),der(8)t(8;21)(q22;q22),ins(15;21)(q15;q22.2q22.3),der(21)t(8;21)(q22;q22). The breakpoints at 8q22 and 21q22 suggested a rearrangement of the RUNX1T1 (alias ETO) and RUNX1 (previously AML1) genes, respectively. Using a dual-color FISH test with RUNX1T1 and RUNX1 probes, we demonstrated an RUNX1/RUNX1T1 fusion signal on the derivative chromosome 8, establishing this translocation as a novel complex variant of t(8;21)(q22;q22).     

inv(16)(p13q22) in chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast phase: a clinicopathologic, cytogenetic, and molecular study of five cases

Blast phase (BP) in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) frequently is accompanied by cytogenetic abnormalities in addition to t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). We describe 5 patients with CML in blast phase (CML-BP) in which t(9;22) and inv(16)(p13q22) were identified by conventional cytogenetics, with confirmation of BCR-ABL and CBFss-MYH11 by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The morphologic findings at the time of BP resembled de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carrying inv(16)(p13q22), with abnormal eosinophils in the bone marrow and monocytosis in the peripheral blood in all cases. In 1 patient, inv(16)(p13q22) and abnormal eosinophils were detected in the bone marrow 2 months before CML-BP. The clinical course of these patients was similar to patients with CML-BP without evidence of inv(16)(p13q22). These cases illustrate that inv(16)(p13q22) is a form of cytogenetic evolution that rarely occurs in patients with CML at the time of BP. In this setting, unlike de novo AML, inv(16)(p13q22) in CML-BP is not associated with a favorable prognosis.     

Gain of multiple copies of the CBFB gene: a new genetic aberration in a case of granulocytic sarcoma

Granulocytic sarcomas (GS) are tumor masses of immature myeloid cells presenting at an extramedullary site, mainly the skin, bone, and lymph node. They are often associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with monoblastic or myelomonocytic differentiation, including either AML M2 with t(8;21)(q22;q22) or AML M4Eo with inv(16)(p13q22). We present a case diagnosed with GS associated with AML M4 that presented a normal karyotype with conventional cytogenetic analysis. Although the myeloblasts did not show the inv(16)(p13q22) (CBFB/MYH11), a gain of multiple copies of the CBFB gene was detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. To our knowledge, no cases with this rare genetic anomaly have been previously described.     

The interest of standard and molecular cytogenetics for diagnosis of acute leukemia

The standard and molecular cytogenetic techniques now belong to the panel of mandatory analyses performed at diagnosis of acute leukemia. Chromosomal abnormalities contribute to define different types of leukemias and present the major advantage to be effective and independent prognostic factors, essential for therapeutic choices. Cytogenetic techniques allowing to identify hyperdiplo?dy >50 chromosomes, t(12;21)(p13;q22)/TEL-AML1(ETV6-CBFA2), t(9;22)(q34;q11)/BCR-ABL, 11q23/MLL, t(15;17)(q22;q12-21)/PML-RARalpha, t(8;21)(q22;q22)/AML1-ETO and inv(16)(p13q22)/ CBFbeta/MYH11 are developed. Among the techniques devoted to study genome, cytogenetics is a basic, simple and effective tool for giving a total picture of the genome through karyotype. Maintaining a systematic cytogenetic analysis is essential, not only because cytogenetics now belongs to routine practice but also because it still contributes to better defining morpho-immunologic sub-types of leukemia, to identify new cytogenetic entities and to understand hematopoiesis and leukemogenesis.     

Cryptic chromosomal aberrations leading to an AML1/ETO rearrangement are frequently caused by small insertions

The translocation t(8;21)(q22;q22), which results in the fusion of the AML1 (RUNX1) and ETO (CBFA2T1) genes, is a recurrent aberration in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), preferentially correlated with FAB M2, and has the highest incidence in childhood AML. Because of the favorable prognosis, the evidence of the t(8;21) or the AML1/ETO fusion gene is mandatory in most of the therapy trials, allowing the stratification of the patients to the correct risk group in terms of treatment. Here we present six out of 59 children with AML who were positive for AML1/ETO by RT-PCR, but showed no evidence of the classical t(8;21)(q22;q22) by conventional cytogenetics. Because of the discrepancies between molecular and cytogenetic analyses, these six patients were further investigated by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Small hidden interstitial insertions resulting in an AML1/ETO rearrangement were detected in five (8.5%) of the 59 patients, whereas the sixth patient showed a cryptic three-way translocation. The insertions could be characterized as ins(21;8) in three patients and ins(8;21) in the remaining two. Additionally, three of the patients showed secondary chromosome aberrations leading to a higher complexity of the karyotype. In conclusion, the combination of more than one standard technique in the analysis of AML1/ETO is useful to reveal the overall frequency of cryptic chromosome rearrangements and permits a better understanding of the mechanisms involved in the generation of this fusion gene.     

Cohabiting t(12;22) and inv(3) primary rearrangements in an acute myelomonocytic leukemia (FAB M4) cell line

We describe the cytogenetic characterization of MUTZ-3, the first continuous cell line to be established from acute myelomonocytic leukemia (FAB M4) cells, exhibiting recurrent chromosomal rearrangements associated with this disease category. MUTZ-3 was established from peripheral blood taken at presentation from a 29-year-old male patient and carries the t(12;22)(p13.2;q11.2) associated with acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AMMoL), the inv(3)(q21.2q26.3) associated with multilineage acute myeloid leukemias (AML), and the inv(7)(p14q35) associated with ataxia telangiectasia (A-T). There was no evidence that the patient was an A-T heterozygote. The breakpoint on chromosome 22 mapped between 5'BCR and D22S39, consistent with the G-banding assignment. Both inversions were translocation-associated and may be further examples of an association previously described in AML FAB M4eo with inv(16). We suggest that the combination of inv(3)/t(3;3) with t(12;22) may represent a new, nonrandom association in AML. Genes Chromosom Cancer 16:144–148 (1996). © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with t(7;21)(p22;q22)

The t(7;21)(p22;q22) resulting in RUNX1‐USP42 fusion, is a rare but recurrent cytogenetic abnormality associated with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes. The prognostic significance of this translocation has not been well established due to the limited number of patients. Herein, we report three pediatric AML patients with t(7;21)(p22;q22). All three patients presented with pancytopenia or leukopenia at diagnosis, accompanied by abnormal immunophenotypic expression of CD7 and CD56 on leukemic blasts. One patient had t(7;21)(p22;q22) as the sole abnormality, whereas the other two patients had additional numerical and structural aberrations including loss of 5q material. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis on interphase cells or sequential examination of metaphases showed the RUNX1 rearrangement and confirmed translocation 7;21. Genomic SNP microarray analysis, performed on DNA extracted from the bone marrow from the patient with isolated t(7;21)(p22;q22), showed a 32.2 Mb copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH) within the short arm of chromosome 11. After 2‐4 cycles of chemotherapy, all three patients underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). One patient died due to complications related to viral reactivation and graft‐versus‐host disease. The other two patients achieved complete remission after HSCT. Our data displayed the accompanying cytogenetic abnormalities including del(5q) and cnLOH of 11p, the frequent pathological features shared with other reported cases, and clinical outcome in pediatric AML patients with t(7;21)(p22;q22). The heterogeneity in AML harboring similar cytogenetic alterations may be attributed to additional uncovered genetic lesions.     

Banding and molecular cytogenetic studies detected a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene that appeared as abnormal chromosomes 1 and 16 in a baby with acute myeloid leukemia FAB M4-Eo

The acute myeloid leukemia (AML) subtype M4Eo occurs in 5% of all AML cases and is usually associated with either an inv(16)(p13.1q22) or a t(16;16)(p13.1;q22) chromosomal abnormality. At the molecular level, these abnormalities generate a CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene. Patients with this genetic alteration are usually assigned to a low-risk group and thus receive standard chemotherapy. AML-M4Eo is rarely found in infants. We describe clinical, conventional banding, and molecular cytogenetic data for a 12-month-old baby with AML-M4Eo and a chimeric CBFB-MYH11 fusion gene masked by a novel rearrangement between chromosomes 1 and 16. This rearrangement characterizes a new type of inv(16)(p13.1q22) masked by a chromosome translocation.     

Myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia with t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) is commonly a therapy-related disease associated with poor outcome

The t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) translocation is rare in cases of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We studied 17 patients with MDS/AML associated with t(3;21) and compared them with 17 patients with MDS associated with inv(3) (q21q26.2)/t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), because these entities share 3q26 locus abnormalities. The t(3;21) group included 9 men and 8 women, with a median age of 62 years (range, 13-81 years). One case was de novo AML and 16 cases were therapy-related, including 12 MDS (blasts, <15%) and 4 AML (blasts, 33%-50%). All patients had multilineage dysplasia, whereas none had thrombocytosis. Additional cytogenetic aberrations were identified in 12 cases, including -7/7q (n = 9) and a complex karyotype (n = 7). All patients died, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 35% and 6%, respectively. Although multilineage dysplasia and frequent association with -7/7q were similar in both groups, MDS/AML cases associated with t(3;21) have a higher frequency of therapy-related disease and shorter survival times, suggesting that they are distinct from MDS/AML cases associated with inv(3)/t(3;3).     

Inversion of chromosome 16 with the Philadelphia chromosome in acute myelomonocytic leukemia with eosinophilia. Report of two cases.

Two cases are described with the rare combination of inv(16)(p13q22), strongly associated with acute myelomonocytic leukemia with eosinophilia, M4Eo, and the Philadelphia translocation, t(9;22)(q34;q11), hallmark of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and rarely found, (less than 1%), in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. The patients were: case 1, a 9-year-old girl presenting with a white blood cell count (WBC) 42 x 10(9)/L with 32% blasts and bone marrow with blasts and eosinophil precursors consistent with M4Eo, and case 2, a 25-year-old man with WBC 34.7 x 10(9)/L with 13% blasts and bone marrow with features of M4Eo and basophilia. Both patients achieved remission but died following bone marrow transplantation in first remission (case 1) or in relapse (case 2). Cytogenetic findings were: case 1, at diagnosis, 46,XX,inv(16)(p13q22)(21)/46,XX,t(9;22) (q34;q11),inv(16)(8)/46,XX(10), and case 2, at diagnosis, 46,XY,t(9;22) (q34;q11),inv(16)(p13q22) (16) and in remission, 46,XY,t(9;22)(q34;q11) (1)/46,XY (24). Investigation of the breakpoint on 22 in case 1 with Southern blotting and the polymerase chain reaction demonstrated the presence of a p190 mRNA and a breakpoint typical of acute leukemia. Thus a diagnosis of M4Eo was supported by clinical and cytogenetic sequelae in each case; the Ph in case 1 was apparently secondary to inv(16), in case 2 the Ph probably preceded inv(16) in the etiology of the leukemia.     

Fusion gene-mediated truncation of RUNX1 as a potential mechanism underlying disease progression in the 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome

The 8p11 myeloproliferative syndrome (EMS) is a chronic myeloproliferative disorder molecularly characterized by fusion of various 5' partner genes to the 3' part of the fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene at 8p, resulting in constitutive activation of the tyrosine kinase activity contained within FGFR1. EMS is associated with a high risk of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the mechanisms underlying the disease progression are unknown. In the present study, we have investigated a case of EMS harboring a t(8;22)(p11;q11)/BCR-FGFR1 rearrangement as well as a t(9;21)(q34;q22) at the time of AML transformation. FISH and RT-PCR analyses revealed that the t(9;21) leads to a fusion gene consisting of the 5' part of RUNX1 (exons 1-4) fused to repetitive sequences of a gene with unknown function on chromosome 9, adding 70 amino acids to RUNX1 exon 4. The t(9;21) hence results in a truncation of RUNX1. No point mutations were found in the other RUNX1 allele. The most likely functional outcome of the rearrangement was haploinsufficiency of RUNX1, which thus may be one mechanism by which EMS transforms to AML.     

Three novel cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements associated with increased EVI1 expression and poor prognosis identified in 27 acute myeloid leukemia cases

In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), increased ecotropic virus integration site 1 protein homolog (EVI1) gene expression is prognostically unfavorable. Subsets of cases show 3q26 rearrangements, such as inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26), frequently accompanied by chromosome 7 abnormalities. We investigated whether cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements may cause EVI1 overexpression in myeloid malignancies without 3q26 abnormalities and investigated 983 patients with AML (n = 606) or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS; n = 377) with normal karyotype (CN‐AML/CN‐MDS, n = 594) or chromosome 7 abnormalities (n = 389) for EVI1 rearrangements using interphase FISH. We identified cytogenetically cryptic EVI1 rearrangements in 27 patients (19 AML, 8 MDS): inv(3)(p24q26) [n = 10]; t(3;21)(q26;q11) [n = 9]; and der(7)t(3;7)(q26;q21) [n = 8]. Elevated EVI1 expression was detected in nearly all cases with cryptic EVI1 rearrangements: Median %EVI1/ABL1 was 92.8 (range: 29.8–146.1) in inv(3)(p24q26), 104.9 (41.4–176.3) in t(3;21)(q26;q11), and 101.8 (4.4–210.4) in der(7)t(3;7)(q26;q21). This was similar to median %EVI1/ABL1 of 73.9 (range: 7.3–585.6) in an independent cohort of inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) and 67.1 (2.3–410.7) in other 3q26/EVI1 rearrangements. Healthy controls showed median EVI1 expression of 0.5 (range: 0.0–5.8). Using SNP microarray and sequencing analyses, the breakpoints of der(7)t(3;7)(q26;q21) were assigned to CDK6 and centromeric of EVI1, and of t(3;21)(q26;q11) to be within EVI1 and NRIP1. Median overall survival in patients with cryptic EVI1 rearrangements was short, comparable to patients with inv(3)(q21q26)/t(3;3)(q21;q26) or other EVI1 rearrangements. Cryptic EVI1 rearrangements contribute to explain the clinical heterogeneity of CN‐AML and are associated with elevated EVI1 expression and an unfavorable prognosis. Screening for cryptic EVI1 rearrangements by FISH may be particularly appropriate in CN‐AML with elevated EVI1 expression or in AML/MDS patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Nonrandom additional chromosome changes in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with inv(16)(p13q22)

Five patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22), all with additional chromosome changes, are reported. Three were diagnosed as having acute myelomonocytic leukemia (FAB-M4), and the other two as having acute monocytic leukemia (FAB-M5b). All five patients had abnormal eosinophils in the bone marrow at diagnosis. Two had a deletion of the long arm of chromosome #7, del(7)(q31), and a trisomy of chromosome #22. These changes have been reported frequently in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia with inv(16), but are extremely rare in leukemias with other specific rearrangements including t(9;22), t(8;21), and t(15;17). Our findings and review of the literature indicate that inv(16) is observed not only in acute myelomonocytic leukemia but also in acute monocytic leukemia, and that del(7q) and +22 are nonrandomly associated with inv(16) as additional abnormalities. No significant differences in the clinical features seem to exist between the patients with only inv(16) and those with inv(16) and additional chromosome changes, except for the lower white blood cell count in the latter group.     

t(10;16)(q22;p13) and MORF-CREBBP fusion is a recurrent event in acute myeloid leukemia

Recently, it was shown that t(10;16)(q22;p13) fuses the MORF and CREBBP genes in a case of childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M5a, with a complex karyotype containing other rearrangements. Here, we report a new case with the MORF-CREBBP fusion in an 84-year-old patient diagnosed with AML M5b, in which the t(10;16)(q22;p13) was the only cytogenetic aberration. This supports that this is a recurrent pathogenic translocation in AML.