Specific effects of benzodiazepines and tricyclic antidepressants in panic disorder: comparisons of clomipramine with alprazolam SR and adinazolam SR

In order to compare the efficacy and safety of tricyclic antidepressants and benzodiazepines in panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia, two studies were carried out comparing clomipramine with alprazolam sustained release (SR) or with adinazolam SR. Two hundred and fifty‐seven patients received alprazolam SR (2–6 mg/day given in two divided daily doses) or clomipramine (50–150 mg/day given in two divided daily doses) for 12 weeks in a single‐blind, randomised, multicentre study and 347 patients received adinazolam SR (30–90 mg/day given in two divided daily doses) or clomipramine (50–150 mg/day given in two divided daily doses) for 24 weeks in a double‐blind, randomised, multicentre study. Both benzodiazepines showed an earlier onset of therapeutic efficacy than clomipramine. At the end of the treatment periods, however, clomipramine was equally as effective as alprazolam SR and more effective than adinazolam SR. Withdrawal problems were also somewhat less common with clomipramine than with alprazolam SR and adinazolam SR. Both benzodiazepines were clearly better tolerated than clomipramine. The rate of premature withdrawal was also notably higher with clomipramine than with alprazolam SR. In conclusion, the benzodiazepines alprazolam and adinazolam SR are better tolerated than the tricyclic antidepressant clomipramine in the treatment of panic disorder, but have no advantages in terms of efficacy. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Clomipramine, a better reference drug for panic/agoraphobia. II. Psychomotor and cognitive effects

The present reference drugs for the treatment of panic disorder and agoraphobia are imipramine and alprazolam. The latter decreases performance and cognitive functioning. No study of such functions in panic/agoraphobia is available. Fifty four out-patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia (PAG), taking part in a parallel groups controlled trial of imipramine (mean dose ±SEM 114±9 mg), clomipramine (50±4 mg) and propanteline (active placebo) over 8 weeks, were studied. A test battery of psychomotor and memory tests was administered at baseline, and after 1, 4 and 8 weeks of treatment. Their results were compared (at baseline and at the end of the trial) with those of a control group of 57 normal untreated subjects. There was no difference between treatments, and no drug effect on any test at any time. No consistent difference between patients and controls was detected. Given its apparently higher potency, and the absence of deleterious effects on cognitive measures known to be affected by benzodiazepines, we conclude that clomipramine is better than imipramine or alprazolam as a reference drug for panic/agoraphobia.     

Kinetics and dynamics of intravenous adinazolam, N-desmethyl adinazolam, and alprazolam in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam mesylate (10 mg), N-desmethyl adinazolam mesylate (NDMAD, 10 mg), and alprazolam (1 mg) were investigated in 9 healthy male subjects in a randomized, blinded, single-dose, 4-way crossover study. All drugs were intravenously infused over 30 minutes. Plasma adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam concentrations, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the beta (12-30 Hz) range, performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and subjective measures of mood and sedation were monitored for 12 to 24 hours. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam, respectively, were as follows: volume of distribution (L), 106, 100, and 77; elimination half-life (hours), 2.9, 2.8, and 14.6; and clearance (mL/min), 444, 321, and 84. More than 80% of the total infused adinazolam dose was converted to systemically appearing NDMAD. All 3 benzodiazepine agonists significantly increased beta EEG activity, with alprazolam showing the strongest agonist activity and adinazolam showing the weakest activity. Alprazolam and NDMAD significantly decreased DSST performance, whereas adinazolam had no effect relative to placebo. Adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam all produced significant observer-rated sedation. Plots of EEG effect versus plasma alprazolam concentration demonstrated counterclockwise hysteresis, consistent with an effect site delay. This was incorporated into a kinetic-dynamic model in which hypothetical effect site concentration was related to pharmacodynamic EEG effect via the sigmoid E(max) model, yielding an effect site equilibration half-life of 4.8 minutes. The exponential effect model described NDMAD pharmacokinetics and EEG pharmacodynamics. The relation of both alprazolam and NDMAD plasma concentrations to DSST performance could be described by a modified exponential model. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic modeling was not possible for adinazolam, as the data did not conform to any known concentration-effect model. Collectively, these results indicate that the benzodiazepine-like effects occurring after adinazolam administration are mediated by mainly NDMAD.     

Diffusion in HPMC Gels. II. Prediction of Drug Release Rates from Hydrophilic Matrix Extended-Release Dosage Forms

Purpose. A mathematical model is described for the prediction of the relative change in drug release rate as a function of formulation composition for HPMC-based extended-release (ER) tablets of adinazolam mesylate and alprazolam. Methods. The model is based on the equation derived by Higuchi for the diffusional release of soluble drugs from polymeric matrices and on our recent measurements of the concentration dependency of adinazolam diffusivity in dilute HPMC gels and solutions. The assumptions made in applying the model include (i) that diffusion is the sole mechanism of drug release (i.e. swelling kinetics are ignored), and (ii) that the surface area-to-volume ratio and concentrations of adinazolam, lactose and HPMC in the gel layer are proportional to that of the dry tablet. Results. Reasonable correlations were obtained between the experimental drug release rate ratios and the predicted drug release rate ratios for ER adinazolam mesylate (R² = 0.82) and low-dose (0.5 mg) ER alprazolam tablets (R² = 0.87). The predictive power for a 6-fold higher dose of ER alprazolam tablets was not as good (R² = 0.52). Conclusions. These results are consistent with previous knowledge of the release mechanisms of these formulations. ER adinazolam mesylate and ER alprazolam 0.5 mg exhibit primarily a diffusion controlled release mechanism, while ER alprazolam 3 mg deviates from pure diffusional release. The limitations of the model are discussed and point to the need for continued study of the swelling kinetics of matrix ER systems.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam after oral and intravenous dosing in healthy young and elderly volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were studied in 18 young subjects, from 21 to 36 years of age, and 18 elderly subjects, ranging in age from 65 to 76 years. Nine men and 9 women per age group were studied in a randomized three-way crossover design. Single doses of one 30-mg adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablet, one 30-mg immediate release tablet, and 15 mg of intravenous adinazolam mesylate were administered. Plasma adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and psychomotor performance tests, including digit-symbol substitution and two card-sorting tasks, were performed. An effect index, defined as the maximal performance decrement divided by N-desmethyladinazolam maximum plasma concentration was calculated as a measure of sensitivity to these effects. Adinazolam oral and systemic clearances were reduced approximately 30% and 25%, respectively, in elderly volunteers. Adinazolam half-life was prolonged approximately 40% in the elderly after oral dosing. N-Desmethyladinazolam plasma concentrations and half-life were increased approximately 40% in elderly volunteers. Psychomotor performance decrements were observed following all treatments; decrements were lowest following sustained release tablets and intravenous adinazolam. Maximal performance decrements in elderly subjects were approximately twice those observed in young subjects. No significant influence of age on the effect index for digit-symbol substitution was evident. Effect indices for card-sorting tests were significantly higher in the elderly. Lower clearances of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam are observed in elderly volunteers, and increased N-desmethyladinazolam levels contribute to increased psychomotor performance decrements in elderly subjects. Results also suggest that elderly subjects may be more sensitive to certain cognitive effects of N-desmethyladinazolam.     

Adinazolam--a new antidepressant: findings of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study in outpatients with major depression

Adinazolam mesylate, a new triazolobenzodiazepine with antidepressant properties, was significantly superior to placebo based on the following efficacy measures: number of subjects who completed the study; number of subjects whose total score on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) decreased by 50% or more; and number of subjects who reported that the drug helped them. Mean scores on three HAM-D clusters (anxiety/somatization, sleep disturbance, and an endogenomorphic cluster) also showed significant differences in favor of adinazolam. Side effects were generally mild and transient; however, a seizure of moderate intensity occurred during rapid tapering of adinazolam from 90 to 40 mg/day. There were no significant anticholinergic effects, and no mania or hypomania was reported in any subject. No consistently significant differences were observed between subjects whose primary diagnosis was major depression and those with a diagnosis of bipolar II depression.     

Clinical pharmacology of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam mesylate following single intravenous infusions of each compound in healthy volunteers

Summary The tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam (NDMAD) were assessed following intravenous infusions of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg adinazolam mesylate, 10, 20, 30 and 40 mg NDMAD mesylate, and placebo. Six subjects per dose level received treatments in a double-blind crossover design.No clinically significant changes were seen in blood pressure, pulse, respiration, or clinical laboratory parameters. Untoward effects typical of benzodiazepines were observed almost exclusively after NDMAD administration. Adinazolam and NDMAD pharmacokinetics were dose-independent. NDMAD clearance was 50% of the value for adinazolam. Adinazolam and NDMAD administrations increased uric acid clearance and decreased plasma uric acid. Adinazolam administration had no significant effect on psychomotor performance. NDMAD administration produced dose related decreases in performance; 286 ng/ml NDMAD produced a 50% decrease in DSST.These results confirm that adinazolam and NDMAD both produce uricosuria and definitively show that adinazolam is devoid of benzodiazepine-like effects at therapeutic concentrations; NDMAD mediates these effects. Uricosuric activity is present for both compounds, but the relative potencies are still unknown.Presented in part at the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the American College of Clinical Pharmacology, Las Vegas, NV, November 4–8, 1990     

Comparison of the spectrum of cognitive effects of alprazolam and adinazolam after single doses in healthy subjects

Single doses of alprazolam (0, 0.5, 1.5 mg) or adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablets (SR) (0, 15, 45 mg) were administered to separate groups of 12 healthy men in a crossover design. Psychomotor performance was assessed by digit symbol substitution (DSST), and memory was assessed using a test battery which reflects various aspects of memory, including attention/working memory, explicit memory (recall of categorically related words), semantic memory (fragmented picture recognition, generation of category exemplars), and implicit memory (time saved in resolving fragmented pictures on the second exposure). Maximal psychomotor performance and memory decrements for the highest active doses were significantly different from placebo for all tasks at some time after dosing. The maximum decrement in DSST was not significantly different between drugs at the high dose (P=0.288). Maximum attention/working memory decrements were significantly different between the high doses of the active compounds (P=0.031), and the difference in maximum category recall decrement was marginally significant (P=0.067). Access to knowledge memory was not significantly altered by these drugs; these results are similar to those obtained for other benzodiazepines. Both drugs exhibited slight effects on implicit memory. The results suggest that the sedative and memory effects of these triazolobenzodiazepines may not be closely related and suggest that adinazolam has a somewhat different spectrum of cognitive effects relative to alprazolam.     

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam: multi-ethnic comparisons

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam and N-demethyladinazolam (NDMAD), its major active metabolite, were compared in 39 healthy male volunteers (13 Asian, 12 Caucasian and 14 African-American). In a four-way, double-blind crossover design, subjects were administered (1) 30 mg oral adinazolam mesylate SR tablets, (2) 10 mg parenteral (IV) adinazolam mesylate, (3) 30 mg IV NDMAD and (4) placebo. Venous blood samples were collected at specific time intervals after drug administration and assayed for adinazolam and NDMAD concentrations. Sedation was rated at the time of each blood draw according to the Nurse-Rated Sedation Scale, and the digit-symbol substitution test was administered to evaluate psychomotor performance. After IV administration of adinazolam, Asians manifested significantly higher C_max, larger AUC and lower CL of both adinazolam and NDMAD than their Caucasian and African-American counterparts. Likewise, after IV NDMAD Asians had significantly higher NDMAD C_max and AUC than Caucasians and African-Americans. Most of these differences remained statistically significant after controlling for body surface area. With PO adinazolam, Asians also manifested substantially higher C_max, larger AUC and lower CL for both adinazolam and NDMAD; however, with the exception of C_max, these differences did not reach statistical significance. These results are in accordance with previous observations for ethnic-related differences in drug pharmacokinetics. In contrast, pharmacodynamic differences were not noted among the three study groups. Received: 19 June 1996/Final version: 17 September 1996     

Comparison of adinazolam pharmacokinetics and effects in healthy and cirrhotic subjects

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam were investigated in six patients with cirrhosis and six sex-matched control subjects. These subjects received a single 30-mg oral dose of adinazolam mesylate. Serial blood samples were collected for 24 hours after drug administration. Plasma was assayed for adinazolam and mono-desmethyl-adinazolam (NDMAD) concentrations by a specific HPLC technique. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental methods. Psychomotor effects of adinazolam were assessed using a digit-symbol substitution test (DSST) and aiming test (AIM). Memory effects were assessed by a modification of the Randt memory test (MEM); sedation was assessed using an observer-rated scale. Differences in pharmacokinetics of the parent drug were noted: adinazolam oral clearance was lower in patients with cirrhosis (35.0 +/- 27.9 L/hr) than in normal subjects (73.7 +/- 22.1 L/hr; P = .024); Kel was significantly lower in patients with cirrhosis (.126 +/- .084 vs. .278 +/- .070; P = .007), whereas the mean t1/2 in patients with cirrhosis was 7.70 hours as compared with 2.67 hours in normal subjects. Cmax was higher in the group with cirrhosis (266 +/- 95.5 vs. 153 +/- 29.3 ng/mL; P = .019). For NDMAD, Kel was lower in cirrhotic subjects and resulted in a prolonged t1/2 in cirrhotic subjects compared with normal subjects (6.70 vs. 3.79 hr; P = .0152). NDMAD AUC tended to be higher in cirrhotic subjects (1515 +/- 254 vs. 1162 +/- 254 ng.hr/mL; P = .064). No significant differences were noted in psychomotor performance, memory, or sedation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of dosing regimen on alprazolam and metabolite serum concentrations and tolerance to sedative and psychomotor effects

The relationships between alprazolam and metabolite concentrations and CNS effects were determined in a double-blind placebo controlled four-way crossover trial in 16 normal male volunteers. Active drug treatments consisted of 4-day regimens of 4 mg alprazolam PO daily as 2 mg bid., 1 mg qid, and 0.25 mg each hour. On days 1 and 4, the kinetics, sedative and psychomotor effects were evaluated. Plasma concentrations of the 4- and α-hydroxy metabolites of alprazolam were less than 10% of unchanged alprazolam levels on both days. Accumulation of these metabolites and alprazolam was dependent on alprazolam half-life (11.6 h). Acute and chronic tolerance to the sedative and psychomotor effects was observed with all active drug treatments. All alprazolam treatments resulted in significantly greater sedation than placebo on days 1 and 4. However, on day 4, sedation was 16–36% less than observed on day 1, despite plasma concentrations 1.4–2.76 times the day 1 concentrations. Sedation from alprazolam was reduced in each successive study phase, suggesting a tolerance which was sustained during the 10-day washout between phases. By day 4, psychomotor performance was not different from placebo, indicating more complete development of tolerance than occurred for the sedative effect. Sedation and psychomotor impairment on day 1 were greatest with 2 mg alprazolam bid. During the initiation of therapy, the patient will likely experience less sedation and psychomotor impairment with smaller, more frequent doses. Since tolerance develops to these effects, the advantage of more frequent dosing regimen dissipates by the 4th day.     

The relationship of alprazolam dose to steady-state plasma concentrations

Alprazolam is a widely used antianxiety agent, yet relatively little is known about the relationship between chronic oral doses and steady-state plasma levels. This study examines the relationship over a wide range of therapeutic doses. We conducted a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 36 patients with agoraphobia with panic attacks, or panic disorder with limited phobic avoidance based on DSM-III criteria. Patients received alprazolam (N = 25) or placebo (N = 11) beginning at 1 mg/day and increased weekly until either a maximum tolerated dose or 10 mg/day was achieved. Dosages were then gradually tapered according to a predetermined schedule. The entire study period lasted 14 weeks. Laboratory and clinical assessments were conducted weekly. Doses up to 6 mg/day were tolerated by 80% of patients on alprazolam and doses of 10 mg/day were tolerated by 40% of patients. Twenty-seven percent of the placebo patients reached 10 tablets/day. In the alprazolam group, the principal cause of intolerance was sedation. Throughout the study no significant changes in vital signs or laboratory parameters were observed. Steady state alprazolam, 4-hydroxy alprazolam, and alpha-hydroxy alprazolam plasma levels were linearly related to dose. A 1 mg dosage increment produced, on the average, a corresponding 10 ng/ml increase in steady state level of the parent drug. Significant response was observed in subjects who achieved concentrations greater than 20 ng/ml, with a maximum of 81% of the samples classified as responders within the 60 ng/ml and above group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Alprazolam in the elderly: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics during multiple dosing

Previous studies have suggested that elderly men eliminate alprazolam more slowly than young adults. This study in the elderly was designed to determine whether a change in pharmacokinetics influences the response to alprazolam during multiple dose regimens. In addition, the study was designed to determine alprazolam pharmacokinetics and the degree to which its hydroxymetabolites accumulate, the degree of psychomotor impairment, and whether tolerance to impairment and sedation develops during three different multiple dose regimens. Twenty-six subjects completed this study. The subjects were randomized into one of three treatment groups: 0.25 mg q8h, 0.5 mg q8h, and 2 mg q12h. Subjects remained in the clinic for 8 days (day — 2-day 5). Day 0 was used as a drug free testing day to establish baseline scores for sedation, digit symbol substitution (DSS), card sorting (CS) tasks, and two computer tests. Subjects received the drug according to schedule on days 1 through 4, with day 5 as the washout day. Blood samples were assayed for alprazolam, alpha-hydroxyalprazolam and 4-hydroxyalprazolam. Alpha-hydroxyalprazolam concentrations were below assay detection limits in all subjects in the 0.25 and 0.5 mg q8h groups and 2.6 ng/ml in the 2 mg q12h group. When detectable, 4-hydroxyalprazolam concentrations were <10% of the corresponding alprazolam concentration. Mean alprazolam oral clearance values in the three treatment groups ranged between 0.54 and 0.62 ml/min/kg and half-lives were in excess of 21 h. Degree of sedation and impairment was dose related. Sedation and impairment was not higher on day 4 despite concentrations 2–3 times as great as on day 1, indicating development of tolerance. Subjects were not, however, back to baseline level of performance on day 4.     

A comparative pharmacokinetic and dynamic evaluation of alprazolam sustained-release, bromazepam, and lorazepam

Sustained-release (SR) alprazolam may facilitate compliance with oral benzodiazepine treatment of panic disorders that currently requires doses administered three or four times daily. To compare the pharmacokinetic, psychomotor performance, and subjective effects of alprazolam SR (1.5 mg), bromazepam (3 mg taken three times daily), and lorazepam (1 mg taken three times daily), 13 male volunteers (aged 20-45 years) randomly received on four separate occasions one of these medications or placebo. Once before and 11 times after drug administration, the subjects were tested using psychomotor performance tests (manual tracking and digit-symbol substitution test [DSST]) and computerized questionnaires (such as the Tufts University Benzodiazepine Scale [TUBS], the Addiction Research Center Inventory, and the visual analog scales) to determine the subjective effects of the drugs. Blood samples for the determination of the plasma levels of the drugs were collected before and 17 times after the drug was administered. A peak plateau of plasma alprazolam began approximately 6 hours after the dose, which was later than the initial peaks for lorazepam and bromazepam (1-2 hours after the dose). Once this plateau had begun, alprazolam SR sustained that concentration better than did the other two formulations. Of the 10 measures on which the response averaged for the first 14 hours differed among drugs (p < 0.05), bromazepam differed from placebo on two measures, lorazepam on four (including DSST Performance and TUBS Sedation), and alprazolam SR on nine (including all four affected by lorazepam). Lorazepam and alprazolam, but not bromazepam, produced significantly more sedation than placebo. The doses of the three drugs were not equipotent in sedation and mood effects. None of the drugs tested differed from placebo on measures relevant to abuse liability.     

Influence of repeated administration of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam in healthy subjects

Summary Adinazolam is a new triazolobenzodiazepine bearing an alkyl-amino side chain. A cross-over double-blind placebo controlled study was carried out in 12 healthy volunteers, in order to check the possible interaction between cimetidine and adinazolam after repeated co-administration.Cimetidine or placebo were given during 17 days. Beginning on Day 8 of each treatment, adinazolam was given in the increasing doses following sequence of doses for 3 days: 10 mg b.i.d., 20 mg b.i.d. and 20 mg t.i.d. A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study was performed on the third day at each dose. A wash-out of three weeks was included between the two treatments.Cimetidine increased significantly the AUC values of both adinazolam and N-desmethyladinazolam, reduced the oral clearance of adinazolam, and prolonged adinazolam's half-life.The digit symbol substitution test was significantly affected at each dose level while the manual dexterity was marginally impaired by adinazolam plus cimetidine.Saftee-up interview and Clyde mood scale indicated an increased sedation under adinazolam plus cimetidine in four subjects.     

Long-term comparison of alprazolam, lorazepam and placebo in patients with an anxiety disorder

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 200 patients with moderate to moderately severe anxiety we compared the anxiolytic efficacy and safety of alprazolam and lorazepam. Dosing was flexible and ranged from 1 to 4.5 mg/day of alprazolam and from 2 to 9 mg/day of lorazepam. The mean daily dose at the end of the 16 week study was alprazolam 3.3 mg and lorazepam 5.1 mg. Both active drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving the symptoms of anxiety on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, with a trend toward more improvement in the alprazolam group in the later weeks of the study. Target Symptoms, Physician's and Patient's Global Impressions and the Self Rating Symptom Scale indicate that alprazolam and lorazepam were superior to placebo. The major side effects were sedation and drowsiness; the frequency was similar for alprazolam and lorazepam and twice as high for active drug as placebo. An overall rating of side effect severity was not significantly different among the three groups.     

The effects of triazolobenzodiazepines in two animal tests of anxiety and in the holeboard

In addition to possessing anti-anxiety activity in man, triazolobenzodiazepines have been reported to have antidepressant and antipanic properties. In this they differ from classical 1,4-benzodiazepines that have only anti-anxiety activity. The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of the triazolobenzodiazepines in two animal tests of anxiety and in the holeboard, to see whether clear differences could be observed between them and the 1,4-benzodiazepines. After acute administration, U-43,465 (16 mg kg-1) had a significant anxiolytic effect in the social interaction test. Neither adinazolam (1-3.5 mg kg-1) nor alprazolam (0.125-2 mg kg-1) had a significant effect. It is suggested that this is because, with adinazolam and alprazolam, doses at which anxiolytic effects can be observed are close to those at which sedative effects can be observed. U-43,465 (8-16 mg kg-1) and alprazolam (1-2 mg kg-1) had significant anxiolytic effects in the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety. U-43,465 (8-32 mg kg-1), adinazolam (0.5-5 mg kg-1) and alprazolam (0.2-2.0 mg kg-1) caused dose-related reductions in exploratory head-dipping, locomotor activity and rearing in the holeboard. In general the results seen in the three tests with the triazolobenzodiazepines alprazolam and adinazolam were similar to those seen with classical 1,4-benzodiazepines. With U-43,465, however, an anxiolytic effect was observed in the social interaction test after acute treatment; chronic treatment is required to see an effect with classical 1,4-benzodiazepines. In this U-43,465 resembles the effects of several novel non-benzodiazepine putative anxiolytic compounds that are believed to have less sedative potential than the benzodiazepines.     

Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Adinazolam in Elderly Subjects

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam (AD) were evaluated in 21 elderly subjects (mean age, 69 ± 4 years) at four dose levels during a placebo-controlled, double-blind, dose escalation regimen in which the oral dose was varied from 10 to 60 mg daily, in divided doses. Fifteen subjects received adinazolam mesylate; six received placebo. Plasma samples collected during a single dosing interval in each dosing period (3 days) were assayed for adinazolam and monodesmethyl adinazolam (NDMAD) by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Urine samples were collected during a single interval during the 20- and 40-mg daily dose periods and assayed for NDMAD by HPLC. Pharmacologic effects of adinazolam were assessed using psychomotor performance tests and sedation ratings. Adinazolam pharmacokinetics were linear over the dosage range studied. Daily dose had no significant effect on dose-normalized AUC and C _max for AD. Dose-normalized NDMAD AUC values as well as values were not significantly affected by the daily dose of adinazolam. The ratio NDMAD/AD was not substantially affected by the dose. Renal clearance of NDMAD for the 20-and 40-mg daily doses were 5.6 ± 2.1 and 5.5 ± 2.2 liters/hr, respectively, and did not correlate with creatinine clearance. Adinazolam and NDMAD did not substantially accumulate in elderly subjects, even upon multiple dosing at 8-hr intervals. The dosing regimens in this experiment appeared to be well tolerated in the elderly, as performance tests and sedation scores indicated no substantial dose-related effects of adinazolam on psychomotor performance.     

The effects of repeated doses of clomipramine and alprazolam on physiological,psychomotor and cognitive functions in normal subjects

Summary The effects of a 10 day administration of clomipramine (25–50 mg t.i.d.), alprazolam (0.25–0.75 mg t.i.d.) and placebo were assessed in normal volunteers in a double-blind cross-over study. A battery of physiological, psychomotor and cognitive tests was administered both before and 3 h after drug on days 1, 5 and 10.The effects of alprazolam on EEG and evoked potentials were characteristic of benzodiazepines; clomipramine had little effect. In contrast, reaction speed was markedly slowed by clomipramine but little affected by alprazolam.Neither drug produced any accumulation of effect on a verbal recall task but neither did tolerance develop to the acute impairments produced by active treatments. Alprazolam produced an increase in levels of forgetting, especially on day 5. Subjective ratings for mood and bodily symptoms were adversely affected by clomipramine but little altered by alprazolam.It is suggested that some of the differences between drug treatments may be due to differences in the speed of onset of tolerance.     

Single dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of adinazolam after oral administration to man

An aqueous solution containing 1 mg of adinazolam mesylate per ml was administered orally as a single dose (40 mg) and with loading doses followed by hourly doses such that final dose rates of 1, 2, and 3 mg h-1 were administered to steady-state. Four subjects exhibited linear steady-state kinetics, while the other four exhibited Michaelis-Menten kinetics, based on measurement by HPLC of both unchanged drug and the major N-demethyl metabolite. The drug is very rapidly absorbed and has an intrinsic clearance of total (bound + free) drug which averaged 2.14 l min-1 based on the steady-state data and 1.17 l min-1 based on the single dose data, but these means do not differ significantly. The apparent metabolite clearance, CLmc/fm (where fm = fraction of adinazolam converted to the N-demethyl metabolite), averaged 0.170 l min-1 based on steady-state data and 0.179 l min-1 based on single dose data and these means do not differ significantly. Pharmacokinetic parameters, such as these clearances, had large intersubject variations. Three types of bioavailabilities were estimated from the data.