腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的临床分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补腹壁切口疝的手术方法及临床效果.方法 回顾性分析41例腹壁切口疝行腹腔镜下补片修补术患者的临床资料.结果 38例均顺利完成手术, 3例中转开腹.手术时间 78～186 min,平均 95 min.术后疼痛轻微,术后排便、排气时间 25～41 h,平均 32 h.术后第 2 d进食.术后住院 5～7 d,平均 6 d.41例随访 6～16个月,平均 9个月,未见疝复发.结论 腹腔镜下采用复合补片修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法,值得临床推广应用.     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术20例

目的 探讨腹腔镜治疗腹壁切口疝的安全性及有效性.方法 回顾性分析2009年6月至2011年9月20例腹壁切口疝患者的资料.其中男14例,女6例,年龄26 ～ 76岁,平均57.3岁.距离上次手术时间间隔为4～26个月,平均7个月.腹正中切口13例,侧腹部切口7例.有2例为缝合修补术后复发病例.结果 所有患者均采用复合补片进行修补,腹壁缺损大小4cmx5cm～ 10cm×13 cm.手术时间40～ 170 min,平均100 min.术后所有患者切口Ⅰ期愈合,术后补片上方疝囊内积液5例,经局部穿刺抽吸并加压包扎后治愈.术后修补区域腹壁疼痛1例,给予口服美洛昔康片对症处理,于术后3个月内逐渐消失.术后住院时间4～13d,平均7d.18例患者获得随访,随访6～30个月,平均15个月,1例复发.结论 腹腔镜下复合补片修补腹壁切口疝具有损伤小、术后疼痛轻、并发症少、恢复快等优点,值得推广.     

老年腹壁切口疝的腹腔镜下修补术

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法 2004年11月至2006年6月对17例老年切口疝患者行腹腔镜下应用补片切口疝修补术。结果 16例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间65～132min,平均95min。术后恢复排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：疼痛3个月以上者3例,浆液肿5例,穿刺口感染1例,均经保守治疗后好转,无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访7～26个月（平均13个月）,未见切口疝复发。结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解,采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片修补老年腹壁切口疝安全、有效。     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

腹腔镜下腹壁切口疝修补术

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行腹壁切口疝修补术的方法、安全性及临床效果。方法2004年9月至2007年6月对56例切口疝（腹壁缺损长径7～19cm,宽径4～12cm）的患者行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术。结果55例腹腔镜下行腹腔粘连松解和补片固定,顺利完成切口疝修补手术,1例因肠管与腹壁粘连紧密而中转开腹修补术。手术时间60～135min,平均92min。肠功能恢复早,术后排便、排气时间平均为31h,术后住院5～7d。术后并发症：术后疼痛达3个月以上者有9例,浆液肿8例。无手术死亡和肠瘘发生。随访16～28个月,平均19个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,值得临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的应用体会

目的：探讨腹腔镜腹壁切口疝补片修补术的临床应用价值及安全性。方法：2005年8月至2006年10月我院为8例腹壁切口疝患者使用自膨胀式聚丙烯-膨化聚四氟乙烯双面复合型补片行腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术,其中2例联合行胆囊切除术。结果：8例手术均获成功,手术时间55～150min,平均85min,无手术死亡病例及并发症发生,患者术后8～24h后下床活动,1—2d排气,术后疼痛轻,2—3d后完全缓解,3—7d（平均4d）患者顺利康复出院。随访12～24个月无复发。结论：腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术安全可靠,具有创伤小、术后康复快、并发症少、不增加手术穿刺孔、可完成联合手术等优点,临床应用前景广阔。     

肌后间隙修补法治疗腹壁切口疝患者的疗效

目的探讨肌后间隙修补法（Sublay）在腹壁切口疝患者治疗中的手术效果。 方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年8月,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科107例行Sublay手术的腹壁切口疝患者的临床资料,分析患者的一般资料、手术方法、并发症及术后转归情况,随访其有无切口疝复发及补片相关并发症发生情况。 结果本组患者均顺利完成手术,平均手术时间（60.3±7.8）min,平均住院时间（17.6±5.3）d,所有患者术后恢复良好,2例患者出现脂肪液化,经换药后伤口愈合;1例患者出现皮下血肿,1例患者出现血清肿,经局部加压保守治疗后治愈,无伤口感染及局部异物感,无死亡患者。随访时间6～38个月,平均随访时间（22.7±10.8）个月,无切口疝复发,无死亡患者,无补片感染、慢性疼痛及局部异物感等补片相关并发症发生。 结论肌后间隙修补手术（Sublay）治疗腹壁切口疝结果满意,手术疗效较好。     

腹壁疝补片修补术后感染的外科处理

目的总结腹壁疝补片修补术后感染的外科处理方法及经验。方法回顾性分析我科2007年6月至2010年5月期间16例腹壁疝补片修补术后感染并接受外科处理的患者的临床资料,其中男10例,女6例;年龄24～73岁,平均45.2岁。其中腹壁切口疝补片修补术后感染11例,腹壁肿瘤切除术后腹壁缺损补片修补术后感染4例,回肠代膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术后感染并尿瘘1例。患者表现有补片暴露、慢性流脓、腹壁慢性窦道及肠皮瘘,均就诊于初次手术的医生,经局部换药处理后3～24个月未愈。患者在我科接受了根治性感染网片切除及腹壁重建术。结果所有患者均将感染补片取出,5例采用成分分离技术自体组织游离修补,4例同时应用聚丙烯平片加强修补,5例同时行脱细胞基质生物补片修补,1例未行修补给予切口创面负压吸引加局部换药,1例去除补片后未行加强修补直接缝合关闭切口。术后住院时间9～25d,平均14d。术后切口一期愈合13例,其余3例切口经局部换药二期愈合。随访6～34个月,平均22个月,无疝复发。结论腹壁疝或缺损补片修补术后感染的外科处理非常棘手,需根据患者个体具体情况处理方可取得满意效果。     

腹壁切口疝修补术后腹壁膨出相关因素研究

目的探讨腹壁切口疝术后腹壁膨出（bulging）及复发的发生率及其相关危险因素。 方法回顾性分析2008年1月至2017年12月,复旦大学附属华东医院行腹壁切口疝修补术治疗的774例患者临床资料,观察腹壁膨出及疝复发的发生率与临床病例因素的关系。 结果术后平均住院时间（8.15±2.60）d,随访时间3～78个月。术后腹壁膨出58例（7.49%）,患者体质量指数（BMI）、是否急诊手术、是否使用补片、补片放置层次、手术入路、是否关闭腹壁缺损等与腹壁切口疝修补术后腹壁膨出有关。 结论影响腹壁切口疝术后腹壁膨出发生的独立危险因素为BMI、是否急诊手术、是否使用补片、补片放置的层次、手术入路、是否关闭腹壁缺损。临床应加强术前病例的筛选,减少急诊手术的同时,严格控制患者体重,选择合适的手术方式和植入修补、确实关闭腹壁缺损,并加强术后切口管理,以预防和减少腹壁切口疝术后腹壁膨出的发生。     

双层聚丙烯补片在腹壁切口疝修补中的应用

目的探讨应用人工合成材料双层聚丙烯补片修补腹壁切口疝的效果。方法 21例腹壁切口疝（15例大切口疝和及6例巨大切口疝）患者采用双层聚丙烯补片行无张力修补,对术中及术后情况进行分析。结果全组病例手术顺利,手术时间87～189min,平均123min。无严重并发症发生,痊愈出院。术后随访5～36个月（平均17个月）,无复发病例。结论双层聚丙烯补片修补中下腹壁大切口疝及巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法 ,是临床上治疗切口疝可供选择的一种手术方式。     

腹股沟疝补片修补术后补片感染外科处理方法的研究

目的探讨腹股沟疝补片修补术后补片感染的外科处理方法和经验。方法回顾性分析北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科2011年1月至2012年6月期间收治的67例腹股沟疝补片修补术后发生补片感染患者的临床资料,对患者的伤口愈合情况加以分析。结果67例患者均行清除感染补片及周围感染组织,未再重新放置补片,均行一期全层缝合伤口,同时放置伤口引流管。均成功清除了感染的补片;术后住院时间10～25d,平均16d;术后伤口一期愈合51例,拆线后伤口存在浅部感染、经局部换药后延期愈合16例。术后66例患者获访,随访时间为6～24个月（平均20个月）。随访期间,均无切口下积液、伤口感染、肠瘘、术后疼痛等并发症发生,无腹股沟疝复发。结论腹股沟疝补片修补术后补片感染的外科处理十分复杂,采用去除补片、彻底清创、一期缝合及放置伤口引流管的综合手术治疗方法可以获得比较满意的疗效。     

Repair of large complex recurrent incisional hernias with retromuscular mesh and panniculectomy

BACKGROUND: Recurrent incisional hernia repair is associated with high recurrence and wound complication rates. METHODS: The clinical courses of patients who underwent recurrent incisional hernia repair via retromuscular mesh placement with concomitant panniculectomy at a university teaching hospital from 1999 to 2004 were reviewed retrospectively. Postoperative evaluation included a quality of life survey. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients (13 male, 34 female) with an average body mass index of 34.4 kg/m2, an average midline hernia defect of 31.4 cm, and at least 1 and on average 2.5 previous repair attempts underwent hernia repair. Wound infections occurred in 4 patients (8%) and seromas requiring aspiration occurred in 1 patient (2%). Four patients (8%) had re-recurrences of their hernias. All patients rated the postoperative appearance of their abdomen as at least satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent incisional hernia repair with a retromuscular mesh and panniculectomy has low recurrence and wound complication rates and excellent patient satisfaction.     

Recurrences in laparoscopic incisional hernia repairs: a personal series and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic repair of incisional ventral hernias with ePTFE mesh continues to evolve, with variable reporting of surgical techniques and outcomes. This report of 34 cases discusses, with a literature review of laparoscopic incisional hernia repair, specific factors associated with three recurrences. METHOD: Retrospective analysis and review of the literature. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (16 female, 16 male), underwent 34 laparoscopic repairs: average age-54 years (27-80), average weight-207 lbs (100-300). Nineteen patients (62%) were undergoing first time repairs, 38% were redo cases and 5 cases (14%) involved previous mesh. Operating times averaged 101 minutes (45-220), and average length of stay was 1.9 days (0.6 days excluding 5 patients who required readmission), with 13 patients (38%) being discharged same-day. Two patients developed cellulitis (6%) treated without patch removal. Two enterotomies occurred (6%) both requiring patch removal. Five patients required readmission (14%), and one patient died postoperative day 29 secondary to end-stage liver disease. Three recurrences developed (9%): one secondary to missed enterotomy with reoperation, patch removal and hernia recurrence; one due to omission of suspension suture fixation; and one recurrence developed in a section of the intact old previous incision that extended beyond the original patch. Follow up has averaged 20 months (4-36). CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic repair of ventral and incisional hernias utilizing transabdominal placement of ePTFE patch can achieve excellent results with low morbidity in comparison with open surgical approaches. In reviewing the experience of other investigators, adequate fixation of the mesh, extension to cover the entire previous incision and standardizing the placement interval of the sutures are critical to the success of the repair.     

Operative treatment of ventral hernia using prosthetic materials

Objective The objective of this study was to summarize the clinical experiences in repairing abdominal incisional hernia with prosthetic materials. Methods Eighty-three patients with ventral hernia were analyzed retrospectively. Results Two patients developed pulmonary infection, one developed adhesive ileus, and five developed wound infection. All wounds healed completely during follow-up. Seventy-three (88%) patients were free of pain, and ten patients (12%) felt pain in the operated area within the last month; only one patient required pain-relieving drugs. Twenty-nine patients (35%) felt discomfort, such as stiffness. Four cases experienced postoperative recurrence. Conclusions Incisional herniorrhaphy with prosthetic materials is safe and effective but has a high discomfort rate. Open giant incisional hernia or recurrent incisional hernia should be performed by trained surgeons. Placing mesh in a suitable position and using a patch with minimal reaction and enough tensile strength may improve the prognosis. Further studies are necessary utilizing light polypropylene mesh.     

腹腔镜下复合补片修补耻骨上切口疝(附25例报道)

目的总结腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补的手术方法及效果。方法回顾性分析2007年3月至2010年10月期间笔者所在科室25例行腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补术患者的临床资料。男13例,女12例;年龄35～83岁,中位年龄52岁;其中2例是复发疝。疝缺损下缘距耻骨弓距离均小于5 cm。在直视下采用螺旋钉枪将补片固定到腹壁上,补片下边缘须低于耻骨弓2 cm并将其固定到耻骨弓及双侧的耻骨梳韧带上。结果 25例患者均成功完成腹腔镜下切口疝修补,无中转开腹。疝缺损最大径为6.1～12.5 cm,平均9.5 cm。手术时间为90～180 min,平均128 min。总并发症发生率为28%(7/25)。包括术中膀胱损伤1例;术后补片上方浆液肿4例,经局部穿刺抽吸后消失;术后修补区域腹壁疼痛2例,未行特殊处理于术后1个月内逐渐缓解并消失。22例患者获随访,随访率为88%,随访时间为6～48个月,平均30个月,1例于术后2个月复发,复发率为4%。结论腹腔镜下耻骨上切口疝修补是一种安全有效的方法,其网片重叠缺损边缘至少超过5 cm,网片下边缘必须在直视下固定到双侧耻骨梳韧带上,这样可以增加固定的强度并降低修补术后复发率。     

Cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture or mesh

The objective was to make a cost analysis of incisional hernia repair by suture repair or prosthetic mesh repair. The study included 44 patients who underwent hernia repair between 1991 and 2000. The rate of recurrent incisional hernia after more than 1 year with associated costs was registered. In 1996, the technique of incisional hernia repair was changed from suture repair to mesh repair. With a mesh repair, zero out of 19 patients presented with a recurrence at follow-up, and with suture repair, five out of 13 had a recurrence (P<0.01). The duration of anaesthetic and operation was longer, but stay in the surgical ward, and sick leave was shorter for patients with a mesh repair than for those with a suture repair. For working patients, costs in the operating theatre were 4,095 Swedish kronor (SEK) higher with a mesh repair, and the costs for surgical ward, sick leave, and examination were 10,129 SEK lower than with a suture repair. Thus, with a mesh repair, the total costs were 6,034 SEK lower than with a suture repair. For retired patients, the total costs with a mesh repair were 1,898 SEK lower than with a suture repair. We conclude that in this setting, mesh repair of incisional hernias produced lower costs than suture repair.     

Porcine dermal collagen (Permacol) for abdominal wall reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: A review of Eisenhower Army Medical Center's experience using Permacol (Tissue Science Laboratories, Covington, Georgia) for the repair of abdominal wall defects. METHODS: Retrospective review of medical records of patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction with Permacol. RESULTS: From July 30, 2003 to February 12, 2005, 9 patients underwent repair of complicated fascial defects with Permacol. Indications for surgery included reoperative incisional hernia repair after removal of a infected mesh (3 patients), reconstruction of a fascial defect after resection of an abdominal wall tumor (2 patients), incisional hernia repair in a patient with a previous abdominal wall infection after a primary incisional hernia repair (1 patient), incisional hernia repair in a patient with an ostomy and an open midline wound (1 patient), emergent repair of incisional hernia with strangulated bowel and multiple intra-abdominal abscesses (1 patient), and excision of infected mesh and drainage of intra-abdominal abscess with synchronous repair of the abdominal wall defect (1 patient). At a median follow-up of 18.2 months, 1 recurrent hernia existed after intentional removal of the Permacol. This patient developed an abdominal wall abscess 7 months after hernia repair secondary to erosion from a suture. Overall, 1 patient developed exposure of the Permacol after a skin dehiscence. The wound was treated with local wound care, and the Permacol was salvaged. Despite the presence of contamination (wound classification II, III, or IV) in 5 of 9 patients (56%), no infectious complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Complex reconstruction of the abdominal wall can be associated with a high complication rate. Placement of a permanent prosthetic mesh in a contaminated field is associated with a high rate of wound infections and subsequent mesh removal. Permacol becomes incorporated by tissue ingrowth and neovascularization. Permacol is a safe and acceptable alternative to prosthetic mesh in the repair of complicated abdominal wall defects.     

前入路腹膜前Kugel补片治疗无张力腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝

目的探讨前入路腹膜前Kugel补片治疗无张力腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝的有效性和安全性,并分析其并发症和复发率。 方法回顾性分析2006年1月至2016年1月,广州中医药大学附属东莞中医院40例腹股沟疝复发患者,记录复发疝类型、手术时间、并发症和复发率,采用视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）记录术前术后慢性疼痛的发生率。手术采取前入路,切除手术瘢痕和取出卷曲挛缩的合成补片。创建腹膜前间隙后,将Kugel补片置入腹膜和腹横筋膜之间加强耻骨肌孔。 结果平均手术时间50 min（50～65 min）。术中有8例腹膜轻度损伤,发现后立即修补。无切口感染,3例皮下血肿、1例血清肿,5例术后尿潴留需插尿管。术前慢性疼痛率77.5%,术后12个月后下降至12.5%。随访时间24个月（12～50个月）,无复发患者。 结论前入路腹膜前Kugel补片治疗无张力腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝安全有效、操作简单,尤其适合平片或网塞修补术后有慢性疼痛的复发患者。