Tobacco control interventions in the emergency department: a joint statement of emergency medicine organizations.

Smoking is the leading cause of preventable death and illness in the United States. National practice guidelines call for all health care providers to "ask" all patients about tobacco use, and to "advise, assess, assist, arrange" when smokers want to quit smoking (the "5 As"). Emergency departments (EDs) have not been an important locus of tobacco control efforts, although ED patients typically smoke at rates exceeding that of the general population, are interested in quitting, and often have limited access to primary care. To address the role of emergency medicine in tobacco control, the American College of Emergency Physicians convened a task force of representatives of major emergency medicine professional organizations. Funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the group met in 2004 and 2005. This article represents a summary of the task force's recommendations for tobacco control practice, training, and research. We call on emergency care providers to routinely assess patients' smoking status, offer brief advice to quit, and refer patients to the national smokers' Quitline (800-QUIT-NOW) or a locally available program. Given the global burden of tobacco-related illness, the task force considers it essential for emergency physicians to conduct research into the efficacy of ED-based interventions and to place tobacco control into the training curriculum for emergency medicine residencies. Tobacco control fits within the traditions of other ED-based public health practices, such as injury control. ED-based tobacco control would allow the specialty to help fulfill the Healthy People 2010 mandate to reduce the prevalence of smoking among US citizens.     

Preventive Care in the Emergency Department: Diagnosis and Management of Smoking and Smoking-related Illness in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review

Smoking remains the leading preventable cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States. The efficacy of emergency department (ED)-based patient screening and counseling for smoking cessation is not currently known. OBJECTIVES: To perform a structured, systematic review of the medical literature to assess the efficacy of limited screening and counseling for tobacco use cessation among adults in the primary care and ED settings, and develop recommendations for emergency physicians based on these data. METHODS: A two-person template-driven review of all English-language articles from Medline, the Cochrane Database, and two recent smoking cessation guidelines, with evidence graded according to the scheme of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), was performed. Recommendations were developed, and strength graded, based on this evidence. RESULTS: Of 2,078 citations reviewed, 16 were selected for inclusion, based on their methodologic strength and relevance to emergency medicine. Routine physician screening and counseling may increase quit rates at 6-12 months from 3% (usual care) to 8-11%. Interventions include brief counseling (<3 minutes), possibly supplemented with self-help literature, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), and follow-up telephone calls. CONCLUSIONS: Strong evidence exists, in the primary care setting, that smoking cessation screening and counseling are effective. Limited data exist for ED-based practice, but, based on the burden of disease, relative ease of intervention, and likely efficacy, routine screening of all patients for tobacco use and referral of smokers to primary care and cessation programs are recommended.     

Multicenter survey of emergency physician management and referral for hyperglycemia

Background: The Emergency Department (ED), with its high-risk and often disenfranchised patient population, presents a novel opportunity to identify patients as having undiagnosed or uncontrolled diabetes. Objective: To evaluate Emergency Physician opinion on management and referral for incidental hyperglycemia and on ED-based diabetes screening. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey of all attending and resident Emergency Physicians at three academic EDs. We asked for glucose thresholds to treat and refer non-diabetic and diabetic ED patients for hyperglycemia, comparing physicians' ideal and actual practices. We also inquired about interest in and barriers for active ED-based diabetes screening compared to use of blood glucose values obtained during usual ED care. Results: We contacted 185 physicians, and 152 (85%) completed the survey; 75% of respondents reported routine outpatient referral of non-diabetic patients for random glucose values ≥ 200 mg/dL. However, a majority (71%) believed that they should use a lower threshold to refer than they currently use. Nearly all (92%) agreed that Emergency Physicians should inform non-diabetic patients of elevated glucose values; 53% supported and 21% opposed active ED-based screening of asymptomatic patients. The most commonly cited barriers were limited follow-up (69%), insufficient time/resources (51%), and outside scope of practice (36%). Conclusion: Emergency Physicians support improved recognition of and referral for hyperglycemia, based on glucose values collected during usual ED care. We plan to develop tools to interpret random ED glucose values in the context of undiagnosed and uncontrolled diabetes.     

Health promotion practices of emergency physicians

In this article we describe health promotion practices of emergency physicians (EPs). A survey was mailed to members of the West Virginia American College of Emergency Physicians. Main outcomes included the EP's beliefs regarding health promotion, perceived roles in health promotion, and perceived effectiveness in modifying the behavior of patients. Over 90% of respondents routinely asked about cigarette smoking and half about alcohol use. A minority routinely asked about illicit drug use, diet, exercise, domestic violence, or stress. The majority stated they were the main person responsible for patient health education in their emergency department (ED). Most felt prepared to counsel patients about smoking (68%) and alcohol (59%), although very few described themselves as successful in helping patients change their behavior. Although EPs feel responsible for promoting the health of their patients, only a minority reported routinely screening and counseling patients about prevention and most were not confident in their ability to help patients change their health-related behaviors.     

Kansas office-based nurses' evaluation of patient tobacco cessation activities

In this study, we examined the tobacco cessation efforts of nurses working in primary care settings. A 43-item questionnaire was mailed to 1,036 office-based nurses located throughout Kansas. With a response rate of 50.1%, 415 questionnaires were available for analysis. Although 89% of respondents encountered patients who smoked on a daily or weekly basis, only 51% reported documenting their patients' tobacco use, and 38% assessed patients' readiness to quit. Two thirds (66%) of nurses believed that tobacco management was part of their role but only 35% provided cessation advice, 23% recommended nicotine replacement therapy, and 14% provided coping techniques. Nurses cited barriers such as perceiving patients as disinterested or unmotivated to quit (65%) and having little time (55%), skills (32%), or knowledge (25%). Most (91%) agreed that they needed additional tobacco control education. Nurses who were advanced registered nurse practitioners or clinical nurse specialists were more likely to feel confident about their smoking cessation counseling skills compared to nurses with less education (66.7 vs. 31.2%, p =.010). Office-based nurses identified specific barriers that could be addressed through professional education about tobacco management.     

Activating patients for smoking cessation through physician autonomy support

OBJECTIVE: Test whether physicians' counseling patients for smoking cessation with an autonomy supportive rather than controlling style would increase patients' active involvement in the counseling session and increase maintained abstinence. DESIGN: Randomized trial of 27 community-based physicians using two interview styles, with observer ratings of patient active involvement and assessments of patient smoking status at 6 months, 12 months, and 30 months. PATIENTS: Adult smokers: 336 recruited; 249 for final analyses. INTERVENTION: Physicians used an autonomy- supportive or controlling interpersonal style, randomly assigned within physician, to briefly counsel patients about smoking cessation, using the National Cancer Institute's 4-A's model. MEASUREMENT: Patient active involvement was rated from audio tapes of the interviews. Continuous abstinence came from self-reports at 6 months, 12 months, and 30 months, CO validated at 6 months or 12 months and at 30 months. RESULTS: Physician style did not have a significant direct effect on smoking cessation but did significantly increase patient active involvement in the interview. Active involvement, in turn, increased smoking cessation. Structural equation modeling confirmed a theoretical model in which the intervention positively predicted patient active involvement after controlling for patient reports of wanting to stop smoking, and active involvement significantly predicted continuous abstinence after controlling for previous quit attempts. CONCLUSIONS: Although physicians' autonomy- supportive style while counseling smokers to quit did not have a direct effect on smoking cessation, it increased patients' active involvement in the counseling session which in turn increased continuous abstinence over 30 months. Further research should clarify the direct effects of physician interpersonal style on health outcomes.     

Smoking cessation counseling for parents during child hospitalization: a national survey of pediatric nurses

ABSTRACT Objective: Given the central role played by pediatric nurses in intake assessment, discharge planning, and education for families of hospitalized pediatric patients, a child's hospitalization may provide a unique opportunity for counseling parents about smoking. We sought to determine if hospital policies can support nurses in effectively counseling parents about smoking. Design and Sample: We conducted a national survey of pediatric staff nurses and administrators/educators who were members of the Society of Pediatric Nurses in 2008 (n=888) to explore counseling practices for tobacco control. Measures: Questionnaires included data on demographics, personal and work environment characteristics, hospital policy characteristics, work attitudes and barriers and the main outcome—5As for smoking cessation counseling—Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange. Results: Overall, routine screening for household smokers was most common (43%), followed by advice to quit (25%), assessing willingness to quit (19%), assisting with a quit plan (6%), and arranging follow‐up contact (3%). Nurses working in hospitals with admission assessments specifically asking about household members who smoke were 7 times more likely than those without such assessments to routinely ask about smoking (OR: 7.2, 95% CI: 4.9–10.5). Conclusion: Future research should test the efficacy of developing comprehensive hospital‐wide policies to deliver smoking cessation for parents during a child's hospitalization.     

Counseling medical patients about cigarette smoking: a comparison of the impact of training on nurse practitioners and physicians

Health providers believe that eliminating smoking is an important health promotion goal, but physicians and nurse practitioners may differ in the implementation of that belief. To determine whether nurse practitioners or physicians were more likely to counsel smokers to quit smoking, 12 internal medicine nurse practitioners (100 percent female) and 40 internal medicine physicians (30 percent female) were studied at four San Francisco Bay-area Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers, both before and after training in smoking-cessation counseling. In addition, exit phone surveys of at least 15 smokers per participant were completed as soon as possible following an office visit to the participant (269 nurse practitioner patients; 948 physician patients). It was found that nurse practitioners discussed smoking with patients more often than did physicians (64 percent vs. 50 percent; p less than 0.001), asked patients more often whether they were interested in quitting (49 percent vs. 40 percent; p less than 0.01), distributed more smoking-cessation literature to patients (37 percent vs. 25 percent; p less than 0.001) and made more follow-up appointments about smoking (36 percent vs. 19 percent; p less than 0.001). These differences in counseling behavior between the two groups were not explained by differences in patient characteristics of the two groups. The authors concluded that, given the same training, nurse practitioners are more likely to counsel smokers about quitting than are physicians.     

Nurses' perspectives of smoking initiation, addiction, and cessation

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that 18% of registered nurses smoke. Although nurses can make an important contribution to national cessation efforts, continuing smoking among nurses has been cited as one of the barriers against higher nursing involvement. OBJECTIVES: To develop a national program to assist nurses in smoking cessation through an in-depth understanding of issues related to nurses' attitudes toward smoking and quitting, and to explore nurses' preferences for smoking cessation interventions. METHODS: Eight focus groups were conducted in four states with nurses who were current or former smokers. Content analysis was used to identify major themes. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: initiation of smoking and addiction, myths and misconceptions about quitting, overcoming addictions, and strategies for enhancing successful cessation. Nurses described addiction and cessation efforts similar to those of the general population. However, nurses experienced guilt related to their smoking, and perceived a lack of understanding by nonsmoking colleagues and managers about their need of support for smoking cessation. Nurses who had successfully quit smoking were motivated by health concerns, pregnancy, and their children. Nurses suggested many interventions that would be supportive of their quit attempts, such as worksite services and Internet-based support groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses expressed the need for smoking cessation interventions similar to that of the general population, and for additional support that recognizes two concerns: confidentiality about their smoking in terms of the general public, and support along with counseling with regard to their feelings of shame and guilt in relation to their public image as nurses.     

Nurses'' Tobacco-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in Four Major Cities in China

PURPOSE: To (a) identify Chinese nurses' tobacco-related knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP), including perception of competency in smoking-cessation interventions; (b) identify barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation interventions to patients; and (c) assess the learning needs and smoking status of nurses. Design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in four major cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chongqing) in China from November to December 2003. METHODS: 2,888 registered nurses working in hospitals affiliated with five university schools of nursing in these cities were invited to complete a questionnaire. An instrument used to assess tobacco-related KAP in Hong Kong was translated into Chinese and pilot tested to ensure reliability and validity. FINDINGS: 2,179 questionnaires were returned and after exclusion of the grossly incomplete questionnaires, 1,690 were included in the present analysis. Only 2% of participants were current and 1% were former smokers; most had not received training for smoking-cessation interventions as part of their nursing education program. Two-thirds recognized smoking as a leading cause of preventable death and that smoking cessation was the most cost effective intervention, but only a third routinely assisted patients' quit attempts. Nurses who received training reported greater competence in providing smoking-cessation intervention, and more frequent practice of cessation interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese nurses had some knowledge about the health effects of tobacco use, but seldom practiced smoking-cessation interventions. Those who had prior training had greater competence and more practice. Including tobacco control, especially smoking cessation, in nursing curricula in China has the potential to save millions of lives.     

In-hospital smoking cessation programs: what do VA patients and staff want and need?

In preparation for delivering an inpatient smoking cessation intervention, surveys and interviews of general inpatients and staff were conducted in two Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals to determine the motivation of veterans to quit smoking and to identify facilitators and barriers to inpatient staff delivery of inpatient cessation services. Seventy percent of inpatients were “motivated smokers” (thinking of quitting in the next 30 days), yet only 17% stated that they received cessation services during their hospitalization. Most staff said that VA should do more to assist patients to quit, yet less than half said that they personally provided cessation services due to lack of confidence/training and hesitancy to upset patients. Given the high motivation to quit among hospitalized veterans and the lack of knowledge about providing cessation services among nurses, training health professionals may facilitate and overcome barriers to the provision of these services. As frontline providers, nurses are ideally positioned to deliver inpatient smoking cessation services to hospitalized veterans.     

Preventive Care in the Emergency Department A Systematic Literature Review on Emergency Department-based Interventions that Address Smoke Detectors in the Home

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of an emergency department (ED)-based strategy to identify and counsel selected patients about the importance of an operational smoke detector in the home and to offer a graded recommendation regarding such a strategy. METHODS: A systematic review was facilitated through the use of a structured template, a companion explanatory piece, and a grading and methodological scoring system based on published criteria for critical appraisal. Two Medline combined searches were performed using the following terms: emergency medical services and counseling, protective devices and smoke detectors, accidents, home, burns, fires, and residential fires. A free-text search of indexed and nonindexed citations in Emergency Medical Abstracts from 1977 to 1999 and a search of the Cochrane Library were also performed. In addition, reviewers performed independent Medline searches and suggested four additional studies. Studies selected for inclusion in this systematic review were required to meet the following criteria: 1) report ED-based research and 2) address the topic of fire and burn prevention with some pertinent discussion of ED-based interventions. The initial inclusion criteria had restricted studies to those that reported the results of counseling strategies for smoke detectors. The authors later decided to consider, as indirectly relevant, studies that did not investigate counseling strategies. Data from the selected studies were extracted using the template form, and the validity and applicability of the results to emergency practice were assessed. Recommendations were derived following criteria developed by a systematic review of preventive interventions in the ED. RESULTS: Six articles were closely reviewed. Four of the six studies met the inclusion criteria. One other study that did not meet the inclusion criteria was also considered. No study focused specifically on the counseling of ED patients about smoke detectors. CONCLUSIONS: Following the criteria of the graded recommendations used for the parent project. a recommendation cannot be made either for or against an ED-based strategy to counsel patients on the importance of smoke detectors. No studies located in our review directly assessed the effectiveness of such a strategy. Based on the retrospective case series study of the potential opportunity for a home fire safety intervention during an emergency medical services visit and the Safe Block Project study, it may be worthwhile to consider further research on the effectiveness of systems-level/structural interventions, with a targeted focus on strategies that attempt to overcome barriers associated with active interventions.     

The Emergency Department as a Potential Site for Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of physician counseling and referral on smoking cessation rates and attendance at a smoking cessation program. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial set in a suburban, community teaching hospital emergency department (ED). During study hours, dedicated research associates enrolled consecutive, stable, oriented patients who were smokers. Eligible, consenting patients were randomized to one of two intervention groups. The control group received a two-page "Stop Smoking" pamphlet from the American Heart Association (AHA). Patients in the intervention group were given the AHA pamphlet along with pharmacologic information and standardized counseling by the attending emergency physician, including written and oral referral to a smoking cessation program. The primary outcome measures were telephone contact/attendance at the smoking cessation program by the intervention group and the rate of smoking cessation in both study groups at three months post-ED visit. Categorical data were analyzed by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Rank data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests and continuous data by t-tests. All tests were two-tailed with alpha set at 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients were enrolled; 78 were randomized to the intervention group. Nearly 70% of patients (103) were available for telephone follow-up. The study groups were statistically similar with regard to baseline demographic characteristics and the prevalence of moderate or severe nicotine addiction. None of the patients (0%) in the intervention group contacted or attended the smoking cessation program during the study period (95% CI = 0-4%). The percentages of patients who stopped smoking after three months were similar in the two groups [10.4% (5/48) control vs 10.9% (6/55) intervention; p = 1]. CONCLUSION: The authors found no difference in the smoking cessation rates between ED patients who received written material and those who were counseled by emergency physicians. Referral of patients who smoked to a cessation program was unsuccessful.     

Impact of two ambulatory care training programs on smoking-cessation activities.

BACKGROUND: Tobacco use causes significant morbidity and mortality. Resident physicians at the George Washington University Medical Center are trained to counsel patients to stop smoking. METHODS: I retrospectively reviewed charts of 300 patients treated by resident physicians in the Department of Medicine (200) and the Department of Health Care Sciences (100). RESULTS: In the 200 patients cared for by resident physicians in the traditional internal medicine training program, a smoking history was obtained in 93 (47%). Forty-seven patients (51%) smoked, and 7 smokers (15%) were counseled to stop smoking. In 100 patients cared for by resident physicians in the primary care internal medicine training program, a smoking history was obtained in 94 patients (94%). Twenty-three patients (24%) smoked, and 11 (48%) were counseled to stop smoking. CONCLUSION: Resident physicians in the primary care training program obtained more smoking histories and counseled more patients to stop smoking. Further study is necessary to evaluate strategies that can be used in residency training to encourage smoking-cessation counseling.     

Descriptive analysis of residency-trained emergency medicine physicians

The purpose of this study was to analyze the demographics, practice characteristics, and job satisfaction of physicians who completed emergency medicine residencies. A questionnaire was mailed to 858 physicians who graduated from residencies between 1978 and 1982. A 62.8% response rate (n = 539) was achieved. The majority of respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with their choice of a career in emergency medicine and with the quality of their residency training. Over 22% of respondents cited lack of preparation to perform administrative tasks as a significant weakness of their residency training. The results of survey indicate that emergency medicine physicians are engaged primarily in clinical practice, but that administrative duties increase rapidly in the years following residency graduation. Emergency medicine physicians are still highly concentrated in states in which emergency medicine residencies are located. The percentage of graduates choosing academic careers is smaller than reported in studies of earlier graduates.     

Smoking cessation for HIV infected patients

Cigarette smoking is one of the leading health problems of the general and also of the HIV population. At the HIV clinic at the University Hospital in Basel, Switzerland, many patients expressed the desire to quit smoking. Therefore, an evidence based smoking cessation program was established. The program bases on the two intervention strategies, which have been evaluated as most effective in the state-of-the-art literature: Nicotine substitution and counseling. Counseling bases on dialogues and empowerment. Our smoking cessation program includes a short-term intervention, general information, and a counseling program in several parts. Until recently, in Switzerland, mainly physicians have conducted smoking cessation programs. Moreover, in the German-speaking realm, no publications exist about effective nursing interventions regarding smoking cessation. Thus, the aim of this article is to present an evidence based smoking cessation program offered by both nurses and physicians. Practice experiences indicate that the combination of nicotine substitution and counseling in several parts may be a successful interdisciplinary intervention.     

A systematic review of smoking cessation interventions in the emergency setting

Study objective

Cigarette smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and tobacco use rates are known to be higher among emergency department (ED) patients than in the general population. Despite recommendations from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine and the American College of Emergency Physicians, many emergency clinicians remain uncertain about the benefits of providing ED-based smoking cessation interventions. To address this gap in knowledge, we performed a systematic review of cessation interventions initiated in the adult or pediatric ED setting.

Methods

We conducted an electronic search of the MEDLINE and CINAHL databases through February 2014 and hand searched references from potentially relevant articles. We identified eligible studies, evaluated bias and validity, and extracted data and synthesized findings.

Results

Seventeen studies underwent critical appraisal, with 13 included in qualitative synthesis. The majority (11/13, 85%) of investigations did not report significant differences in tobacco abstinence between cessation intervention groups. The 2 studies reporting significant differences in cessation both used motivational interviewing-based interventions. Two studies evaluated patient satisfaction with ED-based tobacco cessation interventions, and both reported greater than 90% satisfaction.

Conclusions

Findings indicate that ED visits in combination with ED-initiated tobacco cessation interventions are correlated with higher cessation rates than those reported in the National Health Interview Survey. Clear data supporting the superiority of one intervention type were not identified. Lack of a standardized control group prevented quantitative evaluation of pooled data, and future research is indicated to definitively evaluate intervention efficacy.     

Emergency medicine in the Netherlands, the necessity for changing the system: results from two questionnaires.

OBJECTIVE: To obtain information about patient, staff and organization characteristics of Emergency Departments in the Netherlands, and evaluate the changes between 1996 and 1999. METHODS: The heads of the Emergency Departments of all hospitals in the Netherlands were sent a questionnaire concerning patient, staff, and organization characteristics, as well as questions about intended future developments. The results were compared with data obtained from a comparable questionnaire in 1996. RESULTS: In the Netherlands, 113 hospitals (113/126) have an Emergency Department; 105/113 returned the questionnaire (93%). Ninety-two percent of the hospitals reported an increase in annual Emergency Department census and in the number of self-referred patients. The number of Emergency Departments staffed by only surgical residents decreased (52% in 1996 versus 41% in 1999), whereas the number of hospitals employing emergency physicians increased (24% in 1996 versus 45% in 1999). In 92% of the hospitals, nurses who work in the Emergency Department receive specific training. For emergency physicians, a specific training programme is not available, and in fact 30% of the physicians did not have any specific emergency medicine training. Therefore, none of the emergency physicians were fully trained in emergency medicine. According to 88% of all responders, there is a future for emergency medicine as an independent speciality in the Netherlands, and 35% of all hospitals intend to initiate a training programme for emergency physicians in the future. CONCLUSION: Almost all hospitals in the Netherlands reported an increase in the number of patients visiting the Emergency Department, especially in the number of self-referred patients. A majority of the Emergency Departments are now staffed by emergency physicians instead of surgical residents. Developing specific training programmes for emergency physicians should be a priority for the Netherlands in the future.     

Prácticas,barreras y facilitadores de proveedores de salud en clínicas para dejar de fumar en México

ObjectiveTo assess the clinical practice, barriers, and facilitators in promoting smoking cessation in primary healthcare clinics in Mexico City.Material and methodsA mixed method design was used. Surveys (n = 70) and semi-structured interviews (n = 9) were conducted with health personnel involved in smoking cessation clinics.ResultsQuantitative data revealed that physicians were more likely than nurses to 1) ask patients if they smoke (57.9% vs 34.5%, p = .057), 2) ask patients if they are interested in quitting smoking (65.7% vs 26.9%, p = .003), 3) provide advice to quit smoking (54.3% vs 29.2%, p = .056), and 4) assess whether pharmacotherapy is needed (21.9% vs 10%, p = .285). Qualitative data showed that nurses were more likely than physicians to report lack of resources to refer patients to smoking cessation services, lack of pharmacotherapy availability, and lack of provider training in smoking cessation. Reported barriers include lack of motivation among patients, lack of time for assessment, long appointment wait times, and lack of training. Reported facilitators include existence of smoking cessation programmes and pharmacotherapy at no cost to the patient, and having a multidisciplinary team.ConclusionsDue to numerous barriers, smoking cessation interventions are partially implemented in primary care clinics in Mexico City. A restructuring of services is necessary, and nurses should be given a more prominent role.