New measures of diabetes self‐care agency,diabetes self‐efficacy,and diabetes self‐management for insulin‐treated individuals with type 2 diabetes

Aims and objectives. To develop and refine three new scales that measure diabetes self‐care agency, diabetes self‐efficacy and diabetes self‐management to reflect the American Diabetes Association current standards of diabetes care and the American Association of Diabetes Educators self‐care behaviours. And, to establish the clarity, consistency and content validity of the scales. Background. There is a need to have valid and reliable instruments or scales to assess an individual’s diabetes self‐care agency, self‐efficacy and self‐management to plan appropriate interventions that can be effective in improving glycaemic control and delaying or preventing diabetes‐related complications. Design. A methodological design was used to conduct this study. Methods. Ten clinicians and 10 insulin‐treated individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from a diabetes care center in the southern USA participated in this study. Analysis consisted of inter‐rater agreement to determine clarity and consistency with standards of diabetes care and content validity of individual items on the scales (I‐CVI) and the overall scales (S‐CVI/Ave) to determine relevance for current diabetes care practice. Results. All I‐CVI and S‐CVI/Ave of the DSES exceeded the minimum acceptable criteria. All I‐CVI and the S‐CVI of the DSMS also exceeded the minimum accepted criteria, except for one item that had I‐CVI = 0·70. Evaluation of the items and the directions of the scales by the sample of insulin‐treated individuals with T2DM exceeded the minimum criteria of 80% inter‐rater agreement. Relevance to research and clinical practice. Further psychometric testing of the scales with samples of insulin‐treated individuals with diabetes is warranted and will lay the groundwork for further research and clinical practice to enhance the capability, confidence and actual performance of diabetes self‐management activities among insulin‐treated individuals with T2DM. Conclusions. The scales can be used by diabetes care providers to assess and follow‐up individuals with diabetes who need intense case management. They also can be the measures of choice to conduct future research to test the effects of interventions among insulin‐treated individuals with T2DM.     

Effectiveness of a community‐based diabetes self‐management intervention for Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: A pilot study

This pilot study examined the effects of an intervention on diabetes knowledge and self‐management among adults with type 2 diabetes in Wuhan, China. A convenience sample of 29 adults with type 2 diabetes participated in a 6‐week diabetes intervention in a community health center. Data on diabetes knowledge, diabetes self‐management, fasting blood glucose level, blood pressure, body mass index and waist circumference were collected pre‐ and postintervention and at 1‐month follow‐up. The level of diabetes knowledge was significantly greater postintervention, increasing from a score of 12.97 (± 4.04) to 17.14 (± 3.00) and remaining at 17.03 (± 2.23) at 1‐month follow‐up; Significant improvements in self‐monitoring of blood glucose and medication adherence were not found after the intervention. However, fasting blood glucose levels showed a significant decrease from baseline to postintervention and 1‐month follow‐up. Diabetes self‐management education was thus an effective way to improve diabetes self‐care in this Chinese sample.     

Effectiveness of a self‐management support program for Thais with type 2 diabetes: Evaluation according to the RE‐AIM framework

Delivering diabetes self‐management support is an enormous challenge for healthcare providers with limited human resources. We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a DSMS program incorporating the computer‐assisted instruction. The RE‐AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework was applied to evaluate the DSMS program. Ten Public Health Centers in Bangkok, Thailand were randomized into either DSMS program or usual care. Forty eligible patients with type 2 diabetes in each Public Health Center were randomly selected. Totally, 403 patients (200 controls and 203 interventions) participated. About 93.8% participants completed the six‐month follow‐up. Over six months, adjusted mean changes of hemoglobin A1c (?0.14%, 95% confidence interval = ?0.02 to ?0.26, fasting plasma glucose (?6.37 mg/dL, ?1.95 to ?10.78), health behaviors (3.31 score, 2.27 to 4.34), and quality of life (1.41 score, 0.69 to 2.12) were significantly improved in intervention compared to control group. In conclusion, the DSMS program facilitates Public Health Centers to accomplish their support for people with diabetes.     

Self‐management practices of Chinese Americans with type 2 diabetes

The purpose of this study was to examine the level of diabetes self‐management and its association with demographic and diabetes‐related characteristics in Chinese Americans with type 2 diabetes. A questionnaire that measured diabetes self‐management and diabetes‐related characteristics was administered to a sample of 211 Chinese Americans with type 2 diabetes living in America. The results indicated that the participants were likely to take medications but less likely to carry out diet, physical activity, self‐monitoring of blood glucose, and foot care behaviors. Associations between diabetes self‐management and demographic and diabetes‐related characteristics were observed. For example, individuals who had less education and were employed were less likely to engage in diabetes self‐management than those with higher education and who were retired, while individuals who had a longer duration of diabetes and used insulin as a treatment more frequently carried out self‐monitoring than those who had a shorter duration of diabetes and used oral hypoglycemic agents. These findings indicate that the self‐management practices among the participants are suboptimal. Research on developing culturally and linguistically appropriate interventions to promote diabetes self‐management for Chinese Americans is warranted.     

Social barriers to Type 2 diabetes self‐management: the role of capital

Approaches to self‐management traditionally focus upon individual capacity to make behavioural change. In this paper, we use Bourdieu's concepts of habitus and capital to demonstrate the impact of structural inequalities upon chronic illness self‐management through exploring findings from 28 semi‐structured interviews conducted with people from a lower socioeconomic region of Adelaide, South Australia who have type 2 diabetes. The data suggests that access to capital is a significant barrier to type 2 diabetes self‐management. While many participants described having sufficient cultural capital to access and assess health information, they often lacked economic capital and social capital in the form of support networks who promote health. Participants were often involved in social networks in which activities which are contrary to self‐management have symbolic value. As a consequence, they entered relationships with health professionals at a disadvantage. We conclude that structural barriers to self‐management arising from habitus resulting in the performance of health behaviours rooted in cultural and class background and limited access to capital in the form of economic resources, social networks, health knowledge and prestige may have a negative impact on capacity for type 2 diabetes self‐management.     

Self‐efficacy and self‐care behavior of Malaysian patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross sectional survey

This study investigated the association between self‐efficacy and self‐care behavior to determine the degree of self‐efficacy and to examine differences in self‐efficacy according to patient variables, including state of health, of Malaysian patients with type 2 diabetes. The sample comprised 388 patients (respondents). We collected the data from December 2010 to February 2011. We found a significant positive relationship between self‐efficacy and self‐care behavior (r_s = 0.481, P < 0.001). The degree of self‐efficacy was moderately high (mean = 7.570). We found significant differences between self‐efficacy and education level (Wilk's Lambda = 0.918, F[12, 1008] = 2.779, P < 0.05), duration of diabetes (Wilk's Lambda = 0.954, F[8, 736] = 2.264, P < 0.05), other chronic conditions (Wilk's Lambda = 0.967, F[4, 383] = 3.304, P < 0.05) and diabetic complications (Wilk's Lambda = 0.963, F[4, 383] = 3.653, P < 0.05). Self‐efficacy can be used as a model to understand self‐care behavior. Individualized nursing interventions based on self‐efficacy theory should be utilized in high risk diabetic patients so as to assist and improve self‐care behavior.