Immunization with an adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine in liver transplant recipients: antibody decline and booster vaccination with conventional vaccine.

Patients after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) due to hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related disease are at risk of endogenous hepatitis B reinfection and may receive life long prophylaxis with hepatitis B hyperimmunoglobulin (HBIG). In a previous study 16 of 20 OLT patients were immunized successfully with an adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine. To maintain protective antibody levels under immunosuppressive therapy, 11 of these patients were revaccinated with a double dosed conventional hepatitis B vaccine. Median interval between last vaccination and booster was 24 months (range 22-31 months). Antibody titres against hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) were monitored at the day of booster vaccination (day 0), at day 7 and day 28. At day 0, all vaccinees but one had anti-HBs titres greater than 500 IU/L (median 1,925 IU/L, range 196-7,612 IU/L). Maximum antibody titres after previous vaccination declined by a median of 82% (range 47-96%). After booster vaccination the anti-HBs titre increased significantly by a median factor of 2.42 (P<0.05). In conclusion, the majority of liver transplant recipients who previously had responded to adjuvant hepatitis B vaccine exhibited sufficient immunocompetence to produce a substantial antibody response after booster immunization with a conventional vaccine.     

Comparison of intramuscular and intradermal applications of hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients

This study compared the application of intramuscular recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients with the application of accelerated intradermal recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, which can be applied with one-tenth of the standard dose. Sixty seronegative patients for hepatitis B were randomly separated into two groups. Twenty mug of the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was intramuscularly applied at 0-, 1-, 2-, and 6-month intervals to the first group (32 cases). One more dose was applied at month 12 to those whose anti-HBs titers remained below 100 mIU/mL at month 7. The same vaccine was intradermally applied at 2 microg dose six times with one-month intervals to the second group (28 cases). Vaccine applications were continued in those whose anti-HBs titers remained below 100 mIU/mL at month 7 until antibody titers reached above this value or until the dose number became 12. Measurements of antibody titers were repeated at month 13 in both groups. As a result, in the vaccination of hemodialysis patients against hepatitis B, the accelerated ID application of hepatitis B vaccine with a dose reduced to one-tenth is more cost-effective than the standard dose vaccination schedules. Especially for hemodialysis patients, the time has come for routine application of ID hepatitis B vaccine as an alternative vaccination method.     

Response to a Vaccination Schedule With 4 Doses of 40 μg Against Hepatitis B Virus in Cirrhotic Patients Evaluated for Liver Transplantation

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the response to recombinant hepatitis B vaccine after 4 intramuscular doses (40 μg) administered at 0, 1, 2, and 6 months in 157 cirrhotic patients who were liver transplant candidates. Seventeen nonresponders were revaccinated with the same schedule. We studied the association between the following variables and the vaccine response: age, gender, etiology of cirrhosis, diabetes, severity of liver disease (Child-Pugh class and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease [MELD] score), and the number of administered doses. The response rates were: 1 dose, 40% (2/5); 2 doses, 0% (0/7); 3 doses, 32.7% (16/49); and 4 doses, 31.3% (30/96) of patients. The median hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titer was 45 mU/mL (range, 11-620 mU/mL). The response rate to revaccination was 41.2% (median anti-HBs titer, 88 mU/mL; range, 18-190 mU/mL). Diabetics showed a lower response rate than nondiabetic patients (17.2% vs 35.3%; P = .046). No association was observed between the response rate to vaccine and the other variables. In conclusion, the response rate to hepatitis B vaccine reached a little more than 30% in cirrhotic patients who received 3 or 4 doses. No higher response rate was observed among patients who received 4 doses. Diabetes was associated with a lower response rate. Anti-HBs seroconversion rates were not associated with the other variables. Revaccination may significantly increase the response rate to hepatitis B vaccine in cirrhotic patients, and may be considered in nonresponders after the third dose. Early vaccination against HBV should be considered in such patients.     

Levamisole treatment enhances protective antibody response to hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients

Hemodialysis shows a high risk for hepatitis B infection, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination has now become a routine procedure. Unfortunately, 40% to 50% of hemodialysis patients do not have adequate protective antibodies against the HBV vaccination which is thought to be due to depressed cell mediated immunity. Levamisole has been reported to stimulate depressed T-cell activity and enhance B lymphocyte function and restore delayed hypersensitivity reactions in immune-depressed patients. We studied the effects of levamisole, an immunomodulatory agent, on the protective antibody response of hemodialysis patients to the HBV vaccination. Our hemodialysis patients with negative anti-HBs antibody routinely received 40 microg doses of recombinant HBV vaccine intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months, and we followed serum anti-HBs levels. Patients with a serum antibody level of >10 mIU/ml were considered as responders. Study groups were classified as follows. Group 1 was comprised of 96 chronic hemodialysis patients with negative anti-HBs and HBV core antibody (52 male, 44 female, mean age of 45 +/- 15 years and mean hemodialysis duration of 46 +/- 40 months) who received HBV vaccination; 55 patients (57%) were found to be responders. Group 2 was comprised of 19 randomly selected patients who had never received hepatitis B vaccine (13 male, 6 female, mean age of 42 +/- 14 years, mean duration of hemodialysis 31 +/- 27 months) and who were started on an HBV vaccination protocol with levamisole per os 80 mg after each hemodialysis session for 4 months and followed up on serum anti-HBs levels. Seventeen of the patients completed this levamisole treatment. Fourteen of the 17 patients had the levels of the protective serum antibody indicating a higher response rate when compared with patients who did not receive levamisole (82% versus 57%, respectively, p < 0.05). Group 3 was comprised of 19 patients randomly selected from persons who did not respond to previous vaccination programs (10 male, 9 female, mean age of 51 +/- 14 years, mean duration of hemodialysis 41 +/- 31 months). A second HBV vaccination program was started with the same levamisole protocol. In this group, 18 patients completed this treatment model. Fourteen of them responded to the vaccination model. In Group 4, a second HBV vaccination program was applied without levamisole to 20 randomly selected persons who did not respond to the previous routine vaccination program (12 male, 8 female, mean age of 53 +/- 17 years, mean duration of dialysis 51 +/- 38 months). Only 3 of them responded to a second vaccination program. Comparing Group 3 with Group 4, there was a higher responder rate to HBV vaccination (77% versus 15%, respectively, p < 0.0001). These results show that levamisole treatment increases the response rate to the first HBV vaccination and of the previously unresponsive cases by modulating possible cellular immune response.     

Loss of hepatitis B immunity in hemodialysis patients acquired either naturally or after vaccination

AIM: The aim of our study was the long-term evolution of hepatitis B immunity and the titers of antibodies against the surface antigen (anti-HBs) acquired either naturally or after vaccination in hemodialysis (HD) patients with no history of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS: 36 HD patients were vaccinated with 4 doses of 40 microg recombinant B vaccine (Engerix, Rixensart, Belgium), intramuscularly at 0, 1, 2 and 6 months. 21 patients (60%) seroconverted developing anti-HBs titers > or = 10 IU/ml. Two patients were transferred to another unit before completion of 6 months after the last vaccine dose. We followed-up 19 HD patients who were immune against HBV after vaccination (Group A), and 30 immune patients (anti-HBs titers > or = 10 IU/ml) who had never been vaccinated and had antibodies against the core antigen (anti-HBc), diagnostic of natural HBV infection (Group B). In all patients of Groups A and B, anti-HBs were determined every 6 months, starting 6 months after the last dose in the vaccinated patients. Follow-up period lasted from October 2002 - April 2006. RESULTS: The mean follow-up in Group A was 21 +/- 12 months (range 6 - 36) and in Group B 29 +/- 12 months (range 6 - 42). Age, sex, presence of diabetes mellitus and duration of dialysis did not differ between the two groups. Five patients in Group A (26%) and 2 patients in Group B (9%) lost immunity (anti-HBs < 10 IU/ml) (p = 0.07). The median time to loss of immunity in Group A patients was 12 months (interquartile range 6 - 18 months), while in Group B patients it was 15 months (interquartile range 12 - 18 months). No booster dose was administered during the study. The 2 patients of Group B who lost immunity were the oldest of the group and redeveloped anti-HBs 6 and 12 months after they had lost it. During the first 6 months of the follow-up period, Group A had significantly higher anti-HBs titers than Group B (p < 0.05). However, this difference was lost later on, and after the first year of follow-up, anti-HBs titers were decreased significantly in Group A (p < 0.05), but remained unchanged in Group B throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, HD patients lost hepatitis B immunity both after natural infection or vaccination, but naturally infected patients easily redeveloped protective anti-HBs titers. Anti-HBs titers decreased faster in vaccinated patients than in those with natural acquired immunity who held stable titers for a longer period. It is suggested that HD patients should be followed-up regularly for loss of HBV immunity after vaccination and receive a boosting dose when this occurs. In contrast, patients who acquired natural immunity do not need any anamnestic vaccination.     

Comparison of Intramuscular and Intradermal Applications of Hepatitis B Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients

This study compared the application of intramuscular recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients with the application of accelerated intradermal recombinant hepatitis B vaccine, which can be applied with one-tenth of the standard dose. Sixty seronegative patients for hepatitis B were randomly separated into two groups. Twenty μg of the recombinant hepatitis B vaccine was intramuscularly applied at 0-, 1-, 2-, and 6-month intervals to the first group (32 cases). One more dose was applied at month 12 to those whose anti-HBs titers remained below 100 mIU/mL at month 7. The same vaccine was intradermally applied at 2μg dose six times with one-month intervals to the second group (28 cases). Vaccine applications were continued in those whose anti-HBs titers remained below 100 mIU/mL at month 7 until antibody titers reached above this value or until the dose number became 12. Measurements of antibody titers were repeated at month 13 in both groups. As a result, in the vaccination of hemodialysis patients against hepatitis B, the accelerated ID application of hepatitis B vaccine with a dose reduced to one-tenth is more cost-effective than the standard dose vaccination schedules. Especially for hemodialysis patients, the time has come for routine application of ID hepatitis B vaccine as an alternative vaccination method.     

The effect of erythropoietin therapy and hemoglobin levels on the immune response to Engerix-B vaccination in chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis have an increased risk of acquiring hepatitis B infection. Only 43-66% of dialysis patients develop effective anti-HBs titers after vaccination. AIM: To evaluate the effect of recombinant erythropoietin (rEPO) therapy and basal hemoglobin levels on the outcome of the immune response to four doses of IM 40 microg Engerix-B vaccination in hemodialysis and chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients before starting replacement therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred and three patients were included in the study: 34 hemodialysis patients treated with rEPO (Group A), 36 predialytic patients who did not treated with rEPO (Group B) and 33 predialytic patients treated with rEPO (Group C). Plasma creatinine in predialytic patients was 2-7 mg/dL. All patients' HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies were negative. Patients were immunized with IM 40 microg Engerix-B at 0, 1, 3, and 6 months. Anti-HBs titers were measured at 7th month. RESULTS: Eighty seven point one percent of patients from group C developed protective anti-HBs titers compared with 69.4% from group B and 44.1% from group A (p = 0.001). Patients from all groups with baseline hemoglobin levels above 11 gr/dL developed protective anti-HBs titers significantly more than patients with baseline hemoglobin levels below 11 gr/dL (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Predialytic patients treated with rEPO and with hemoglobin levels higher than 11 gr/dL had significantly better immune response outcomes to Engerix-B vaccination. Immunization against hepatitis B infection should be considered at early stages of CKD prior to the deterioration in kidney functions and the development of renal anemia.     

Reinforced intradermal hepatitis B vaccination in hemodialysis patients is superior in antibody response to intramuscular or subcutaneous vaccination

Since 1960, hepatitis B virus-associated chronic liver disease has been considered an important problem in dialysis units in both Europe and North America. Separate dialysis facilities for hepatitis B-infected patients, the implementation of universal precautions for the prevention of transmission, and the active immunization against hepatitis B have now reduced the yearly incidence to less than 0.05% in Western countries. However, only 50% to 60% of patients with renal insufficiency develop sufficient immune response after intramuscular hepatitis B vaccination. The aim of the current study was to determine whether the mode of vaccine application plays a role in vaccination response and whether increasing the vaccine dose of primary intradermal hepatitis B vaccination can reduce the number of vaccine injections in hemodialysis patients. We designed a prospective, randomized study of antibody responses to hepatitis B vaccine given intradermally, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly in 81 hemodialysis patients. Outcome measures were rates of seroconversion, mean levels of anti-Hbs antibodies, and antibody levels 8 years after vaccination. The results show that intradermal hepatitis B vaccination response with a higher vaccination dose than previously used in hemodialysis patients is superior to conventional intramuscular and subcutaneous vaccination and is also well tolerated. Five intradermal injections of 20 microg each induced the development of sufficient anti-Hbs antibody titer, which persisted in 70% of the patients over 3 years.     

Kidney Transplantation from Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Positive Donors into Hepatitis B Surface Antibody Positive Recipients: A Prospective Nonrandomized Controlled Study from a Single Center

The number of patients on renal transplant waiting list is increasing rapidly in many countries, exacerbating the shortage of organs. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of deceased-donor kidney transplantation from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive (+) donors into hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs)-positive (+) recipients. Sixty-five patients received grafts from HBsAg(+) donors, and 308 subjects received grafts from HBsAg-negative(−) donors. Posttransplantation, recipients with HBsAg(−) grafts or HBsAg(+) grafts received 400 U of hepatitis B immunoglobulin once and twice, respectively. The seven recipients who received grafts from hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA(+) donors were treated with hepatitis B immunoglobulin 400 U weekly for 3 months and lamivudine 100 mg daily for 6 months. All patients were monitored for liver function and hepatitis B viral status. The follow-up period was 38.7 ± 15.4 months. Although two recipients developed de novo HBV infection, neither patient developed severe liver dysfunction nor died. The incidence of liver injury (39/65 vs. 207/308, chi-square test, p > 0.05) and survival (log-rank test, p > 0.05) did not differ between the groups. We conclude that anti-HBs(+) recipients receiving HBsAg(+) grafts did as well as those receiving HBsAg(−) grafts.     

Hepatitis B vaccination in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults receiving hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends hepatitis B virus (HBV) immunization for all hemodialysis (HD) patients because they are at high risk of infection. Several studies have shown that the development of protective antibody titers after HBV vaccination is much lower in HD patients. We hypothesized that human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) would further impair the immune response to hepatitis B vaccination. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis from 1990 to 2002 at the United States-based dialysis facilities of Gambro Corporation, North America. The response rate defined as an increase in anti-HBs levels >/=10 mIU/L after a month of the third dose of HBV vaccination was determined in HIV-infected and a randomly selected group of ESRD patients. The demographic information, laboratory data, and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) titers were recorded from the Gambro Corporation database on these patients. RESULTS: Of the 347 adult HIV ESRD patients, 116 received three doses of recombinant hepatitis B vaccination. Seventy percent were male, and the majority (86%) were black. Of the 116 patients who received three doses of HBV vaccination, 62 (53.4%) developed protective antibody titers. This was comparable to the response rate of 50.4% in the randomly selected 220 non-HIV hemodialysis patients. Among HIV ESRD patients, the mean hemoglobin (Hgb) was higher in patients who developed protective antibody titers (Hgb 11.61 +/- 2 vs. 10.55 +/- 1.86, P value <0.01). On multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher Hgb was associated with protective antibody titers (odds ratio: 1.34, 95% CI 0.99-1.72). Seventy percent of the HIV-infected responders maintained protective antibody titers 6 months after vaccination. CONCLUSION: Hepatitis B vaccination should be offered to all HIV-infected ESRD patients because over half of the patients with HIV and ESRD can develop protective antibodies.     

Immunogenicity and Safety of an Intradermal Boosting Strategy for Vaccination Against Influenza in Lung Transplant Recipients

The immunogenicity of influenza vaccine is suboptimal in lung transplant recipients. Use of a booster dose and vaccine delivery by the intradermal rather than intramuscular route may improve response. We prospectively evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a 2-dose boosting strategy of influenza vaccine. Sixty lung transplant recipients received a standard intramuscular injection of the 2006-2007 inactivated influenza vaccine, followed 4 weeks later by an intradermal booster of the same vaccine. Immunogenicity was assessed by measurement of geometric mean titer of antibodies after both the intramuscular injection and the intradermal booster. Vaccine response was defined as 4-fold or higher increase of antibody titers to at least one vaccine antigen. Thirty-eight out of 60 patients (63%) had a response after intramuscular vaccination. Geometric mean titers increased for all three vaccine antigens following the first dose (p < 0.001). However, no significant increases in titer were observed after the booster dose for all three antigens. Among nonresponders, 3/22 (13.6%) additional patients responded after the intradermal booster (p = 0.14). The use of basiliximab was associated with a positive response (p = 0.024). After a single standard dose of influenza vaccine, a booster dose given by intradermal injection did not significantly improve vaccine immunogenicity in lung transplant recipients.     

Challenges in containing the burden of hepatitis B infection in dialysis and transplant patients in India

Aim: Whether or not completing the hepatitis B vaccination in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation in the middle of incomplete vaccination schedule leads to development of protective antibody titres is not known. This study was designed to determine whether the strategy of completing hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination after transplantation is efficacious. Methods: Sixty‐four end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients were screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti‐HBs), hepatitis B e‐antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA. HBsAg negative patients received four doses of 40 µg recombinant HBV vaccine. Schedule was continued in after transplantation period if it was incomplete before transplant. Anti‐Hbs titres were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Results: Past HBV infection was noted in 12 patients: 10 by serology plus viraemia and two by viraemia alone. Of the 46 patients without current or past HBV infection who had received at least two doses of the vaccine before transplant, 17 each had received two and three doses and 12 had completed the schedule. Seventeen (37%) exhibited protective titres. Patients who had completed vaccination were more likely to have protective titres than those incompletely vaccinated (P = 0.02). Five patients responded to post‐transplant vaccination. Conclusion: Partially vaccinated patients do not mount an adequate antibody response despite continued vaccination in the post‐transplant period, whereas complete vaccination provides protection in 60%. The present study data highlights the need of administration of a full schedule of HBV vaccination before kidney transplantation. Nucleic acid‐based tests can identify occult HBV infection.     

Response to an experimental HBV vaccine permits withdrawal of HBIg prophylaxis in fulminant and selected chronic HBV-infected liver graft recipients.

Strategies using lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) for prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT) are expensive since life-long treatment is needed. We evaluated the possibility to obtain protective hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) antibody (anti-HBs) titers after LT and to discontinue HBIg prophylaxis after a reinforced course of vaccination against HBV using an experimental adjuvant HBsAg / AS04 vaccine (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals [GSK], Rixensart, Belgium) in patients transplanted for hepatitis B. Fifteen LT patients on stable low-level immunosuppression were vaccinated with a double dose of the vaccine at 0, 1, 2, 6, and 12 months: 5 patients were transplanted for nonviral diseases and 10 patients were transplanted for HBV on HBIg monotherapy. HBIg were continued during baseline vaccination (0, 1, and 2 months) and when anti-HBs titers determined every 6 weeks dropped below 150 IU/L. Overall follow-up was 18 months. Sustained long-term response to vaccination was defined as anti-HBs titers >500 IU/L without further need for HBIg administration during a follow-up period of at least 12 months. Overall sustained response to vaccination was 53% (8 / 15 patients); 80% (4 / 5 patients) in the nonviral disease group and 40% (4 / 10 patients) in the HBV group (2 /2 fulminant and 2/8 chronically infected patients) developed a sustained long-term response and were completely free of HBIg at the end of the 18-month follow-up. No HBV recurrence, rejection episodes, or side effects occurred during the follow-up. In conclusion, protective anti-HBs titers were obtained in a substantial number of LT patients following a reinforced course of HBV vaccination with vaccines containing new immunostimulating adjuvants. Vaccination seems well tolerated and safe and allows long-term discontinuation of HBIg.     

The safety and efficacy of GM-CSF as an adjuvant in hepatitis B vaccination of chronic hemodialysis patients who have failed primary vaccination

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal disease and the need for chronic hemodialysis is an indication for hepatitis B vaccination, but up to half of dialysis patients fail to respond to a 40 microg/dose i.m. three-dose primary series of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine. Only another 10-20% respond to additional boosting doses of vaccine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since GM-CSF has been shown to be an effective adjuvant for hepatitis B vaccine in healthy subjects and multiple animal vaccine models, we conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of GM-CSF with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in chronic hemodialysis patients. Patients with negative hepatitis B surface antibody and antigen who had received at least three doses of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine without response (antibody titre < 10 mIU/ml) were randomized to placebo, 40 microg, or 80 microg of GM-CSF given with 40 microg recombinant hepatitis B vaccine i.m. at the same site. Clinical and laboratory studies for safety assessment were done on days 1 and 3, and hepatitis B surface antibody titres were measured at baseline and days 21 and 180 after the study injections. RESULTS: No significant local or systemic toxicity was noted from the co-injections. The rates of response and geometric mean titre (GMT) were equivalent among all three study groups: placebo 6/10 developed antibodies, GMT 22.1 mIU/ml; 40 microg GM-CSF 3/10 developed antibodies, GMT 5.4 mIU; and 80 microg GM-CSF 3/8 developed antibodies, GMT 9.7 mIU/ml. Six months after vaccination, antibody titres were available for 11 of the 12 day 21 positive responders; only 4 of these 11 patients remained antibody positive at 6 months. CONCLUSION: GM-CSF given in a single 40 microg and 80 microg i.m. dose was not an effective adjuvant with hepatitis B vaccine in chronic hemodialysis patients who had previously failed to respond to hepatitis B immunization.     

Durability of the hepatitis B vaccination in pediatric renal transplant recipients

Since hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccine implementation, HBV infection has significantly decreased. However, adult renal transplant recipients show a higher rate of seroreversion compared to the general population, leading to HBV infection risk. Data are limited in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Retrospective data were collected to determine the seroprotection and durability of HBV vaccination in pediatric renal transplant patients from 2004 to 2014. One hundred subjects were categorized based on pre‐ and post‐transplant hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). Pretransplant, 85 recipients (85%) had a positive HBsAb compared to 15 (15%) with negative HBsAb. In univariable analyses, other than age (P < .05) no significant differences existed pretransplant by demographics, pretransplantation dialysis, or number of vaccinations. Of the 85 pretransplantation responders, 53 (62%) remained HBsAb positive post‐transplantation, 28 (32%) seroreverted, and 4 developed indeterminate titers. All seroreversions occurred within 5 years post‐transplant. Receipt of a living donor organ had higher risk of reversion (P = .005). No significant differences were found in demographics, pretransplantation dialysis, vaccination number, or acute rejection. Despite vaccination, 15% of pediatric renal transplant candidates were seronegative, and an additional 32% lost seroprotection within 5 years post‐transplantation leaving nearly half of transplant recipients at risk for HBV infection.     

Clinical reactivation after liver transplantation with an unusual minor strain of hepatitis B virus in an occult carrier.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA is detectable in a number of liver transplant candidates who are negative for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). After liver transplantation (LT), such patients may have molecular and/or serologic evidence of HBV replication. However, clinical disease from reactivation of occult HBV infection after LT has not been described. We report a patient who underwent LT for cryptogenic cirrhosis and had to be retransplanted twice for hepatic artery thrombosis. The patient was negative for HBsAg and positive for anti-hepatitis B core (HBc) and anti-HBs before all LT procedures and developed acute hepatitis B shortly after receiving the third graft. The HBV strain isolated at that time exhibited an unusual in frame insertion of a CAG motif within the HBV polymerase (HBV(INS+)). HBV(INS+) was detected retrospectively as a minor species in pretransplantation sera and the explanted native liver by insertion-specific polymerase chain reaction. This case in an occult HBV carrier shows that clinically apparent, endogenous reinfection of the graft may occur with minor HBV variants that are not detectable in pretransplantation samples by standard diagnostic procedures. This has implications for the analysis of sources of acute hepatitis B in patients after LT and possibly for consideration of antiviral prophylaxis in anti-HBc/anti-HBs/HBV DNA-positive patients.     

Immune response after vaccination with recombinant hepatitis surface antigen in maintenance hemodialysis patients and healthy controls.

We evaluated anti-HBs titers 2 months after vaccination with recombinant hepatitis surface antigen (rDNA-HBsAg) in 43 maintenance hemodialysis patients (MHP). Of these, 34 had not undergone hepatitis B virus vaccination previously (NV-MHP) and 9 had shown negative response to vaccination with plasma-derived HBsAg (HEVAC Pasteur; V-MHP). 120 healthy workers from the same hospital undergoing rDNA-HBsAg immunization were used as controls. All low responders (LR) (anti-HBs less than 100 mIU/ml) and nonresponders (NR; anti-HBs less than 10 mIU/ml) were given a booster dose 3 months after the last dose of vaccine. Seroconversion rates were lower in NV-MHP (52.9%) than in controls (98.4%). V-MHP showed higher seroconversion rates (88.9%) than NV-MHP. In each group, the number of responders (R; anti-HBs greater than or equal to 100 mIU/ml), LR and NR was as follows: controls 101, 17, 2; NV-MHP 6, 12, 16; V-MHP 8, 0, 1. After booster dose, 17/17 controls LR and no NV-MHP LR showed a rise in anti-HBs titers over 100 mIU/ml. Six months after the last dose of vaccine or the booster dose, anti-HBs titer fell under 10 mIU/ml in 4/12 MHP LR and under 100 mIU/ml in 6/14 MHP R. To achieve high seroconversion rates and to avoid the decline of anti-HBs to nonprotective titers in MHP, a booster injection should be made at different dates after the first vaccination.     

A successful two-step integrated protocol of anti-HBV vaccination in chronic uremia.

A prospective study was performed in 40 chronic uremics which included: (1) the intramuscular administration to all patients of 40 micrograms of a DNA-recombinant vaccine (Engerix-B) at 0, 1, 2, 6 months; (2) an intramuscular booster dose of 40 micrograms at 18 months in patients having an anti-HBs titer greater than 100 mIU/ml at the 7th month (group A); (3) a further intramuscular supplementary dose of 40 micrograms at 12 months (besides that at 18 months) in patients developing an antibody titer less than 100 mIU/ml at the 7th months (group B); (4) an intradermal course of 5 micrograms of vaccine every 2 weeks until the protective titer (greater than or equal to 10 mIU/ml) was achieved, and then every month for a total of 6 months in patients who did not develop a protective titer even after 19 months (group C). At the end of the study, all patients had developed a protective titer: 77.5% after the 4th intramuscular dose, 12.5% after the 5th and 10% after 3.5 +/- 0.5 (mean +/- SEM) intradermal inoculations. The mean antibody titers were 1,461 +/- 98 mIU/ml in group A, 594 +/- 684 in group B and 131 +/- 133 in group C. In conclusion, our two-step integrated protocol gives an anti-HBs protective titer in all our patients.     

Long-term immunogenicity and efficacy of hepatitis B vaccine in hemodialysis patients.

Although the efficacy of hepatitis B vaccines in patients under chronic hemodialysis treatment has been well documented, the persistence of immunity in this population remains largely unknown. In this study we have followed 60 hemodialysis patients up to 3 years after primary hepatitis B vaccination (four doses of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine; Engerix B, 20 mg/dose) to evaluate the persistence of immunity (as indicated by serum levels of antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen-anti-HBs-higher than or equal to 10 mIU/ml). Fourty-four (73%) patients developed anti-HBs levels above 10 mIU/ml after vaccination; the remaining 16 (27%) vaccinees were considered nonresponders and were given a booster dose that again failed to elicit an immunoresponse. After 3 years of follow-up, 18 out of 44 (41%) responders had no detectable anti-HBs levels in the serum (antibody loss occurring within 8 and 12 months in 3 cases, within 1 and 2 years in 13, and within 2 and 3 years in 2 other cases). When compared with the responders that lost their antibodies during the follow-up period, those who remained immunoreactive 3 years after vaccination was initiated were younger and had higher anti-HBs levels at 8 months of follow-up. Two hepatitis B virus infections were detected among nonresponders during the follow-up period. Based on these data, we conclude that patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis therapy not only have lower response rates to hepatitis B vaccination than healthy adults, but also that these are frequently transient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Intradermal versus intramuscular hepatitis B re-vaccination in non-responsive chronic dialysis patients: A prospective randomized study with cost-effectiveness evaluation

Background. It has been calculated that 30% of chronic uraemic patients fail to produce antibodies to HBsAg antigen after hepatitis B (HB) vaccination. Low-dose intradermal (i.d.) inoculations and supplementary intramuscular (i.m.) injections have been reported to improve the response rate in previous non-responder chronic uraemic patients, but no cost-effectiveness evaluations have been made about this issue. Methods. We re-vaccinated 50 chronic dialysis patients, who did not have any detectable anti-HBs antibody after a reinforced protocol of hepatitis B vaccine given by i.m. route, with hepatitis B recombinant DNA yeast vaccine (80 &mgr;g) by intradermal (25 patients) or intramuscular (25 patients) administration (randomly allocated). We used the same amount of HBsAg in order to exclude the confounding effect of the dose level administered on the immune response of uraemic patients. We studied, over a 20-month follow-up, the persistence of anti-HBs antibodies in our responder vaccinees. We made a comparison between the costs of our re-vaccination protocol and the other re-vaccination strategies that have been recently suggested. Results. One month after completion of re-vaccination protocol, seroconversion rates (100% vs 48%, P=0.008) and proportion of patients who elicited protective anti-HBs titres (96% vs 40%, P=0.0001) were significantly higher in i.d. compared to i.m. patients. The levels of anti-HBs, expressed as geometric mean titres and 95% confidence intervals (GMT (95% CI)), were significantly increased in i.d. than in i.m. groups, 100 (44-187) vs 26 (14-52) mUI/ml (P=0.018). At month 12, the seroconversion rates were 57 vs 14% in i.d. and i.m. groups respectively (P=0.158); the seroprotection rate was higher in i.d. individuals in comparison with i.m. patients, 50 vs 0%, P=0.072. At month 20, the seroconversion rates were 54 and 0% among i.d. and i.m. patients respectively (P=0.055); the seroprotection rate was higher in i.d. than in i.m. group (30 vs 0%, P=0.2). At month 20, the median anti-HBs titres in i.d. patients were 21 mUI/ml, and GMT (95% CI) were 20.9 (2-54) mUI/ml. No important general or local side-effects were observed. The cost of our schedule was $92 US whereas the costs of other re-vaccination protocols ranged between 138 and $807 US. Conclusions. Our results show that the unresponsiveness to recombinant yeast-derived vaccine may be mostly reversed by repeated low-dose i.d. injections of the same agent. In spite of an equal amount of HBsAg received, i.d. hepatitis B re-vaccination shows higher immunogenicity compared to i.m. administration over a 20-month observation period. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that the intradermal administration of HB vaccine is the most clinically effective re-vaccination strategy; it is also the most unexpensive one. We strongly recommend low-dose intradermal inoculations in order to re-vaccinate chronic dialysis patients who fail to respond to hepatitis B vaccination.