High-dose clopidogrel loading in percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE: To review the use of a 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DATA SOURCES: Human clinical trials and platelet studies available through PubMed (1966-March 2005), bibliographies of pertinent articles, and citations supplied by the drug manufacturer were accessed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The administration of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel can decrease the time required for maximum platelet inhibition to 2 hours compared with > or =6 hours achieved with 300 mg. This higher loading dose has been investigated in multiple platelet studies and one observational report. Several randomized controlled trials have used a 600-mg loading dose; however, these studies were not designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this loading regimen. To date, only one randomized trial has compared the 600-mg loading dose with a 300-mg loading dose. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with a conventional loading regimen of 300 mg in lower-risk patients, pretreatment with clopidogrel 600 mg was shown to be more effective in reducing periprocedural events and demonstrated similar safety. Studies are needed to clarify the use of a 600-mg loading dose in higher-risk patients, with concomitant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonism, or when administration is delayed until immediately before or after PCI.     

Aspirin therapy for inhibition of platelet reactivity in the presence of erythrocytes in patients with vascular disease

Inhibition of erythrocyte (RBC) promotion of platelet reactivity could improve the antiplatelet effect of aspirin (ASA). We tested different ASA regimens for optimal inhibition of platelets and the effects of RBC in patients with a history of vascular diseases. Collagen-induced platelet activation (14C-5HT, TXA2 release) and platelet recruitment (proaggregatory activity of cell-free releasates from activated platelets) were measured in PRP, platelet-RBC (Hct 40%), and whole blood (WB) in 206 patients initially on 200-300-mg ASA/day. Their regimen was modified to biweekly 500 mg (loading dose, L) plus daily or twice-daily low-dose ASA (50 or 100 mg). TXA2 was inhibited with all regimens. Percentage of patients with suboptimal inhibition of platelet recruitment in WB was 200-300 ASA/day (41%), L-50/day (87%), L-100/day (58%), L-50/twice-daily (39%), and L-100/twice-daily (20%; P < 0.05 vs other regimens). 14C-5HT release was inhibited to the greatest extent with L-100/twice-daily in PRP + RBC or WB (P < 0.05 vs other regimens) due to greater inhibition of the RBC prothrombotic effect. Compared with other ASA regimens, L-100 twice-daily (equivalent to 221-mg ASA/day in the 14-day cycle), reduced by >50% the proportion of patients with suboptimal inhibition of platelet recruitment in WB and inhibited 14C-5HT release to the greatest extent.     

Greater inhibition of platelet aggregation and reduced response variability with prasugrel versus clopidogrel: an integrated analysis

Multiple studies report response variability to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (LD). Pooled platelet aggregometry data compared responses (change in maximal platelet aggregation [DeltaMPA] or inhibition of platelet aggregation [IPA]) to clopidogrel 300-mg (n = 131) or prasugrel 60-mg (n = 109) LDs. Poor responder rates were determined using empiric criteria (IPA < 10% and DeltaMPA < 10% for 20 microM and 5 microM adenosine diphosphate [ADP]) and Bayesian model-based criteria (IPA < 20% and DeltaMPA < 15% for 20 microM ADP; IPA < 25% and DeltaMPA < 20% for 5 microM ADP). Prasugrel achieved greater DeltaMPA and IPA from 2 to 24 hours post-LD (P < .001). For 20 microM ADP, poor responder rates for clopidogrel ranged from 17% to 43%; no prasugrel poor responders were observed. Regardless of the criterion, prasugrel 60 mg achieved greater IPA and fewer poor responders than the clopidogrel 300-mg LD.     

Investigation of drug–drug interactions between clopidogrel and fluoxetine

Drug–drug interactions may contribute to the variability of the response of clopidogrel. Several hypotheses have been proposed concerning the potential modification of clopidogrel pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics by fluoxetine. This open‐label crossover study assessed the effect of fluoxetine on the pharmacological activity of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers. Eight healthy male volunteers received a single 600‐mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 20 mg of fluoxetine on 4 days and then 20 mg of fluoxetine plus 600 mg of clopidogrel on the fifth day. Eleven blood samples were withdrawn after clopidogrel administration to determine plasma concentrations of clopidogrel active metabolite (CAM) and platelet function. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and platelet reactivity index by flow cytometric vasodilator‐stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) analysis. The areas under the curve and maximum plasma concentrations of CAM were, respectively, 20.6 and 25.3% lower after co‐administration of fluoxetine compared with administration of clopidogrel alone. The percentage maximum platelet aggregation values in the presence of 5 μm and 10 μm adenosine diphosphate, measured by LTA, were, respectively, 13.9 and 22.4% lower after fluoxetine co‐administration. The platelet reactivity index measured by the flow cytometric VASP method was 36.8% lower when clopidogrel was administered in conjunction with fluoxetine.     

Standardization of light transmittance aggregometry for monitoring antiplatelet therapy: an adjustment for platelet count is not necessary

Summary. Background: Light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) is considered to be the ‘gold standard’ of platelet function testing. As LTA has been poorly standardized, we analyzed the results of LTA in healthy subjects and patients with antiplatelet therapy using different concentrations of agonists and performing tests in non‐adjusted and platelet count‐adjusted platelet‐rich plasma (PRP). Methods: LTA was performed in 20 healthy subjects and in patients treated with aspirin (n = 30) or clopidogrel (n = 30) monotherapy, as well as in patients on combination therapy (n = 20), using arachidonic acid (ARA 0.25 and 0.5 mg mL⁻¹) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP 2 and 5 μm ) as agonists and performing platelet function tests in non‐adjusted and platelet count (250 nL⁻¹ ± 10%)‐adjusted PRP. Results: The overall platelet aggregation response is decreased after adjusting the PRP for platelet count compared with measurements in unadjusted PRP. The variability of aggregation results is high in adjusted PRP in the subgroup of healthy subjects, ranging from 9.2–95.3% (5th–95th percentile) relative to 77.6–95.5% in non‐adjusted PRP when determining maximum aggregation to ARA 0.5 mg mL⁻¹. Late aggregation using ADP 2 μm ranges from 3.8–89.9% in adjusted PRP compared with 42.9–92.5% in non‐adjusted PRP. Maximum aggregation using ARA 0.5 mg mL⁻¹ in non‐adjusted PRP differentiates between aspirin‐treated patients and healthy controls well, whereas late aggregation using ADP 2 μm in non‐adjusted PRP offers the best discrimination between clopidogrel‐treated patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: Adjustment of PRP for platelet count does not provide any advantage and therefore the time‐consuming process of platelet count adjustment is not necessary.     

Modified platelet aggregation test in patients on ASA and/or clopidogrel

Therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and/or clopidogrel is used to achieve prophylactic inhibition of platelet aggregation in patients with arterial thrombosis. We examined if aggregometry can be used to see the effect of antiplatelet drugs (ASA 30, 50, 100, 300 mg/d, clopidogrel 75 mg/d or ASA 100 + clopidogrel 75 mg/d). A modified platelet aggregation test was used to investigate maximum aggregation in response to ADP, collagen, adrenalin and arachidonic acid. Reference values were established based on healthy individuals. We devised a simple scoring system for detection of inadequate platelet inhibition. Compared with the control group, we detected a significant delay of maximum aggregation in response to all agonists in patients on ASA and combination therapy ASA + clopidogrel. Patients on clopidogrel alone were found to have prolonged aggregation when induced with ADP, collagen and arachidonic acid. The failure rate to achieve adequate platelet inhibition on 100 mg/d ASA, 75 mg/d clopidogrel or combination therapy was 27%, 26% and 7%, respectively. Our results demonstrate that platelet inhibition in aggregometry is inadequate in many patients with arterial thrombosis.     

Genetic polymorphisms and the impact of a higher clopidogrel dose regimen on active metabolite exposure and antiplatelet response in healthy subjects

A double-blind crossover study was conducted in four CYP2C19 genotype-defined metabolizer groups to assess whether increase in clopidogrel dosing can overcome reduced pharmacodynamic response in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers (PMs). Ten healthy subjects in each of four metabolizer groups were randomized to a clopidogrel regimen of a 300-mg loading dose (LD) and a 75-mg/day maintenance dose (MD) for 4 days followed by 600-mg LD and 150 mg/day MD, or vice versa. The exposure levels of clopidogrel's active metabolite H4 (clopi-H4) in PMs were 71% lower on the 75-mg/day regimen and 64% lower on the 150-mg/day regimen than the corresponding exposure levels in extensive metabolizers (EMs). In PMs, the maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 5 μmol/l was 10.5% lower on the 75-mg/day regimen and 7.9% lower on the 150-mg/day regimen than the corresponding values in EMs. PMs who were on the clopidogrel regimen of 600-mg LD/150 mg/day MD showed clopi-H4 exposure and MPA levels similar to those in EMs who were on the regimen of 300-mg LD/75 mg/day MD. In a pooled analysis evaluating CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP3A5, CYP2D6, ABCB1, and P2RY12 polymorphisms (N = 396 healthy subjects), only CYP2C19 had a significant impact on antiplatelet response. In healthy CYP2C19 PMs, a clopidogrel regimen of 600-mg LD/150 mg/day MD largely overcomes diminished clopi-H4 exposure and antiplatelet response, as assessed by MPA levels.     

Ex vivo--in vitro interaction between aspirin, clopidogrel, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors abciximab and SR121566A

OBJECTIVES: To assess the interaction between aspirin and clopidogrel in healthy male volunteers and the interaction of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitors abciximab and SR121566A with blood from those pretreated subjects (ex vivo-in vitro). METHODS: Aspirin (300 mg/day), clopidogrel (75 mg/day), or the combination of both drugs were administered orally for 8 days. Group 1 (n = 5) started with aspirin and group 2 (n = 5) with clopidogrel. From day 4 to day 8, subjects of both groups received the combined treatment. Blood from these subjects was spiked with abciximab (0.5 and 1.5 microg x mL(-1)) and SR121566A (31 and 62 ng x mL(-1)). RESULTS: In vivo, average bleeding times were 6.8 minutes at baseline, 20.3 minutes for clopidogrel alone (P < .01), 10.9 minutes for aspirin alone (difference not significant), and 24.0 minutes (P < .01) for the combined treatment. Fibrinogen binding to the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor was reduced for aspirin to 69% (difference not significant), to 63% for clopidogrel (difference not significant), and to 63% for the clopidogrel plus aspirin combination (P < .01). CD62 expression as a marker of platelet granular secretion was reduced to 66% by clopidogrel (P < .01) and to 41% by the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin; aspirin alone had no effect. In vitro, with pretreatment with aspirin and clopidogrel, inhibitory effects of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors on fibrinogen binding were additive to changes observed with aspirin or clopidogrel alone. No effect on CD62 expression was observed with either GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor. Aspirin and clopidogrel reinforced effects of the GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors on adenosine diphosphate (5 micromol/L)-induced aggregation in an additive manner, a supra-additive effect was observed with collagen (2 microg x mL(-1))-induced aggregation. CONCLUSION: The augmentation of the antiaggregatory effects of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors by aspirin and clopidogrel and the lack of antisecretory effects of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors may favor their combination with clopidogrel.     

Platelet aggregation disorders

Irrespective of their mechanism of action, anticoagulants reduce the formation and action of thrombin. Thus they interfere with a final step in coagulation. Among platelet inhibitors only the GPIIb/IIIa antagonists inhibit the common pathway of aggregation, namely the formation of platelet-to-platelet bridges which are mediated by fibrinogen or von Willebrand factor. In contrast, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), NSAIDs, clopidogrel (Plavix) or ticlopidine (Tyklid) inhibit platelet activation by abrogating the formation or action of a secondary platelet agonist, namely of thromboxane A(2) or ADP. They do not block platelet aggregation which is directly induced by thrombin. Therefore, ASA, clopidogrel, or ticlopidine are not associated with a significant risk of bleeding as long as other factors such as an extensive thrombocytopenia or anticoagulation are not involved. Therefore, in contrast to anticoagulants, therapeutic drug monitoring is not necessary with ASA, clopidogrel, nor ticlopidine. On the other hand, ASA has even to be applied at a dosage that almost completely inhibits thromboxane synthesis in order to act on platelet aggregation at all. Among the GPIIb/IIIa-antagonists only parenteral drugs have been approved for therapeutic use, e. g. abciximab (ReoPro), eptifibatide (Integrilin), and tirofiban (Aggrastat). Clinical studies revealed an increased risk of bleeding without a sufficient therapeutic benefit of oral GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. GPIIb/IIIa antagonists may induce thrombocytopenia that is attributed to an out-side-in signalling or immunological phenomena. A test system (Ultegra, Accumetrics) is available for a therapeutic drug monitoring of GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. However, estimation of the bleeding risk always requires an evaluation of all factors influencing the haemostatic system, especially when heparin or other inhibitors are applied additionally.     

Recombinant factor VIIa reverses the inhibitory effect of aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel on in vitro thrombin generation

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet drugs constitute the therapy of choice for acute coronary syndromes, but bleeding can be a side-effect requiring treatment. Restoration of normal platelet activity is also mandatory before urgent surgery. This study investigated: (a) whether a regimen of aspirin or clopidogrel plus aspirin significantly inhibited platelet thrombin generation (TG); and (b) the reversal of this inhibition by recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). METHODS AND RESULTS: TG was evaluated by the lag time, time to peak, peak of TG, and area under the curve after 35 min of assay (AUC(0 --> 35 min)). These measures were examined by the calibrated automated thrombography method in 22 healthy volunteers, 22 volunteers after a 100 mg day(-1) aspirin intake (200 mg first day) for 5-7 days, and 22 healthy volunteers after aspirin 100 mg day(-1) (200 mg first day) plus clopidogrel 75 mg day(-1) (300 mg first day) for 4-7 days. The TG parameters were measured under basal conditions and after platelet stimulation by sodium arachidonate (AA), adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP), collagen and rFVIIa in normal non-aspirinated as well as in vivo aspirinated platelet-rich plasma (PRP) or aspirin plus clopidogrel PRP. Lag time was shorter (P < 0.05), and peak of TG and AUC(0 --> 35 min) were significantly greater (P < 0.01 for both), in PRP activated with ADP, collagen, AA or FVIIa than in non-activated PRP from normal subjects. Both non-activated PRP and activated PRP prepared from platelets obtained from volunteers after aspirin intake showed significant prolongation of the time parameters but there was less effect on peak of TG and AUC(0 --> 35 min). For most parameters, aspirin plus clopidogrel administration showed to be more effective compared with the effect obtained by aspirin alone. When rFVIIa was added to ASA-PRP or ASA + Clop PRP, lag time (P < 0.001 for all) and time to peak (P < 0.001-0.017) were significantly shortened, indicating that rFVIIa reverses the inhibitory effect of these anti-aggregating agents. CONCLUSION: Platelets activated by AA, ADP, collagen or FVIIa triggered TG. This effect was inhibited by aspirin plus clopidogrel, suggesting an additional benefit of this drug combination for preventing thrombosis. rFVIIa reverses the inhibitory effect of aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel, and could be useful for bleeding complications or when acute surgery is needed during treatment with these antiplatelet drugs.     

Which platelet function test is suitable to monitor clopidogrel responsiveness? A pharmacokinetic analysis on the active metabolite of clopidogrel

Summary. Background: Multiple platelet function tests claim to be P2Y12‐pathway specific and capable of capturing the biological activity of clopidogrel. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to determine which platelet function test provides the best reflection of the in vivo plasma levels of the active metabolite of clopidogrel (AMC). Patients/methods: Clopidogrel‐naive patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) received a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel and 100 mg of aspirin. For pharmacokinetic analysis, blood was drawn at 0, 20, 40, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 360 min after clopidogrel loading and peak plasma concentrations (C_max) of the AMC were quantified with liquid chromatography‐tandem mass spectrometry (LC‐MS/MS). Platelet function testing was performed at baseline and 360 min after the clopidogrel loading. Results: The VASP‐assay, the VerifyNow P2Y12‐assay and 20 μmol L^?1 adenosine diphosphate (ADP)‐induced light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) showed strong correlations with C_max of the AMC (VASP: R² = 0.56, P < 0.001; VerifyNow platelet reactivity units (PRU): R² = 0.48, P < 0.001; VerifyNow %inhibition: R² = 0.59, P < 0.001; 20 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced LTA: R² = 0.47, P < 0.001). Agreement with C_max of the AMC was less evident for 5 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced LTA or whole blood aggregometry (WBA), whereas the IMPACT‐R ADP test did not show any correlation with plasmalevels of the AMC. Conclusion: The flow cytometric VASP‐assay, the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and, although to a lesser extent, 20 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced LTA correlate best with the maximal plasma level of the AMC, suggesting these may be the preferred platelet function tests for monitoring the responsiveness to clopidogrel.     

Adenosine diphosphate-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel

Summary.  Background:  Until recently, there were hardly any data on the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel in advanced age. Like other metabolic processes, the conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite may be impaired in older patients, leading to high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity. Objective:  To investigate the age dependency of clopidogrel-mediated platelet inhibition. Patients and methods:  This was a prospective observational study. We determined adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP)-inducible platelet reactivity using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay in 191 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy after angioplasty and stenting for cardiovascular disease. Results:  ADP-inducible platelet reactivity increased linearly with age after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, type of intervention, medication, C-reactive protein (CRP) and renal function [using LTA 0.36% of maximal aggregation per year, 95% CI 0.08–0.64%, P  = 0.013; using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay 3.2 P2Y12 reaction units (PRU) per year, 95% CI 1.98–4.41 PRU, P  < 0.001]. ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly higher in patients aged 75 years or older compared with younger patients ( P  = 0.003 for LTA and P  < 0.001 for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay). Further, high on-treatment residual ADP-inducible platelet reactivity was significantly more common among patients aged 75 years or older ( P  = 0.02 for LTA and P  < 0.001 for the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay). Conclusion:  ADP-inducible platelet reactivity shows a pronounced age dependency in the initial phase of antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel. The clinical implications of these findings need to be addressed in future trials.     

Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition attenuates platelet-activating factor-induced platelet activation by reducing protein kinase C activity

Summary.  Glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa inhibition may abolish activated leukocyte-induced platelet activation, in which leukocyte-released platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a major mediator. The present study thus investigated if and how GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors interfere with PAF-induced platelet activation. Platelet and leukocyte activation were monitored by flow cytometry and immunoblotting. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors (c7E3, non-peptide SR121566, and MAb RFGP56) attenuated PAF-induced, but not adenosine diphosphate (ADP)- or thrombin receptor activating peptide ( TRAP)-induced platelet P-selectin expression in whole blood. GPIIb/IIIa blockade enhanced ADP- or TRAP-induced leukocyte CD11b expression, but not the response to PAF. GPIIb/IIIa blockade attenuated PAF-induced, but enhanced ADP- or TRAP-induced platelet–leukocyte aggregation. Under the present experimental conditions, thromboxane A₂ receptor antagonism did not significantly influence PAF-induced platelet activation, and GPIIb/IIIa inhibition did not interfere with calcium mobilization/influx in platelets. Protein kinase C (PKC) blockade inhibited PAF-induced platelet P-selectin expression, and PAF-induced PKC activity was reduced by GPIIb/IIIa inhibition. PAF (=1 µ m ) did not induce MEK 1/2 or ERK 1/2 phosphorylation, whilst thrombin induced marked responses, which were enhanced by GPIIb/IIIa blockade. Thus, GPIIb/IIIa inhibition attenuates PAF-induced platelet activation via inhibiting PKC activity. GPIIb/IIIa blockade enhances thrombin-induced platelet MEK 1/2 and ERK 1/2 activation, and augments ADP- and TRAP-induced leukocyte activation by enhancing platelet–leukocyte aggregation.     

Potentiation of clopidogrel active metabolite formation by rifampicin leads to greater P2Y12 receptor blockade and inhibition of platelet aggregation after clopidogrel

Summary. Background: The thienopyridine P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist clopidogrel reduces the risk of arterial thrombosis and individual pharmacodynamic responses to clopidogrel are believed to reflect the levels of active metabolite (AM) generated. Rifampicin increases the inhibitory effect of clopidogrel on platelet aggregation (PA). We studied the response to clopidogrel before and during administration of rifampicin in order to study the relationship between individual AM levels and P2Y₁₂ blockade. Methods: Healthy volunteers received a 600‐mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 75 mg daily for 7 days and, after a washout period and treatment with rifampicin [300 mg twice a day (b.i.d.)], received the same regimen of clopidogrel. Clopidogrel AM levels were determined over 4 h after the clopidogrel loading dose and unblocked P2Y₁₂ receptor number was assessed using a ³³P‐2MeSADP binding assay. PA was measured by optical aggregometry with ADP and TRAP. Results: Rifampicin enhanced clopidogrel AM production [area‐under‐the‐curve (AUC): clopidogrel 89 ± 22 ng h mL^?1, clopidogrel + rifampicin 335 ± 86 ng h mL^?1, P < 0.0001], and P2Y₁₂ blockade (unblocked receptors: clopidogrel 48 ± 24, clopidogrel + rifampicin 4 ± 2, P < 0.0001) and reduced PA (5 μmol L^?1 ADP: clopidogrel 20 ± 4, clopidogrel + rifampicin 5 ± 2, P < 0.01). Increasing numbers of unblocked receptors were required for an aggregation response with a decreasing concentration of ADP. PA induced by ADP 2 μmol L^?1 was particularly sensitive to low levels of receptor blockade. Conclusion: Potentiation of clopidogrel AM production by rifampicin leads to greater P2Y₁₂ blockade and consequently greater inhibition of PA. PA responses to low concentrations of ADP are more sensitive to P2Y₁₂ blockade.     

A novel modification of the Thrombelastograph assay, isolating platelet function, correlates with optical platelet aggregation

Flow cytometry, singlet platelet counting, and optical aggregation have been used to monitor clopidogrel and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) platelet antagonists. Optical aggregation is considered the gold standard, but neither it nor flow cytometry is convenient in larger-scale clinical studies or point-of-care systems. Singlet platelet counting, a point-of-care assay correlated with optical platelet aggregation, only provides a measurement of platelet function at a single point in time. The Thrombelastograph is used to assay whole blood for thrombin-generated maximal clot-shear elasticity, referred to as the maximal amplitude (MA). Although platelet dysfunction, thrombocytopenia, and the in vitro effect of strong inhibitors such as IIb/IIIa antagonists can be observed, with thrombin generation milder platelet inhibitors cannot be assessed. We modified the Thromboelastograph assay, using reptilase and factor XIIIa, to form a clot, without thrombin generation, in heparinized whole blood. The resulting clot MA is dependent on added platelet agonists such as ADP or arachidonic acid, is sensitive to platelet antagonists, and provides a continuous measure of platelet function more analogous and better correlated with optical aggregation. This novel modification of the Thromboelastograph assay should prove to be a useful point-of-care whole-blood assay with which to monitor the effects of GPIIb/IIIa, ADP, and thromboxane A(2)-receptor-inhibiting drugs in patients.     

Reversal of the anti‐platelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel

Summary. Background: Guidelines recommend stopping aspirin and clopidogrel 7 to 10 days before surgery to allow time for replacement of permanently inhibited platelets by newly released uninhibited platelets.Objectives: The purpose of the present study was to determine the rate of offset of the anti‐platelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel after stopping treatment and the proportion of untreated donor platelets that are required to reverse their anti‐platelet effects.Methods: Cohort 1 consisted of 15 healthy subjects who received aspirin 81 mg day^?1 or clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1 for 7 days and underwent serial blood sampling until platelet function testing results normalized. Cohort 2 consisted of 36 healthy subjects who received aspirin 325 mg day^?1, clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1, aspirin 81 mg day^?1 plus clopidogrel 75 mg day^?1 or no treatment for 7 days and underwent a single blood sampling.Results: In cohort 1, arachidonic acid (AA)‐induced light transmission aggregation (LTA) returned to baseline levels in all subjects within 4 days of stopping aspirin, coinciding with the partial recovery of plasma thromboxane B₂ concentrations. ADP‐induced LTA did not return to baseline levels until 10 days after stopping clopidogrel. In cohort 2, AA‐induced LTA in patient treated with aspirin reached control levels after mixing with 30% untreated donor platelets whereas ADP‐induced LTA in patients treated with clopidogrel reached control levels only after the addition of 90% or more donor platelets.Conclusions: Platelet aggregation recovers within 4 days of stopping aspirin but clopidogrel must be stopped for 10 days to achieve a normal aggregatory response.     

Randomized,double‐blind comparison of effects of abiciximab bolus only vs. on‐label regimen on ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation in responders to clopidogrel undergoing coronary stenting

Summary. Background: On top of aspirin, an abciximab bolus‐only regimen results in a 30% drop in platelet inhibition at 6 h as compared with the on‐label regimen. The concomitant administration of high loading dose clopidogrel, by bridging with abciximab bolus, may sustain suppression of platelet activity over time. Objectives: To investigate the non‐inferiority of abciximab bolus‐only and concomitant high loading dose clopidogrel vs. abciximab bolus + infusion with respect to the inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) as determined by light transmission aggregometry. Patients/Methods: Seventy‐three patients with non‐ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes underwent double‐blind randomization to abciximab bolus followed by a 12‐h placebo infusion and concomitant 600‐mg clopidogrel vs. abciximab bolus + a 12‐h infusion and 300 mg of clopidogrel. IPA was determined by light transmission aggregometry throughout 24 h. Clopidogrel poor responsiveness was defined as ≥ 50% 5 μmol L^?1 ADP‐induced maximum platelet aggregation. Results: In clopidogrel responders (n = 68), IPA after 20 μmol L^?1 ADP at 4 h was 89% ± 13% in the bolus‐only arm vs. 92% ± 14% in the bolus + infusion arm (P = 0.011 for non‐inferiority). IPA after 5 or 20 μmol L^?1 ADP and 5 or 15 μmol L^?1 TRAP and the proportion of patients showing ≥ 80% IPA did not differ at any time point, irrespective of clopidogrel responsiveness status. Thirty‐day outcomes were similar, whereas hemoglobin (0.91 ± 0.8 vs. 0.5 ± 0.7 g dL^?1; P = 0.01) and platelet count mean drop (41.7 ± 57 vs. 18.6 ± 34 10⁹ L^?1; P = 0.042) were significantly reduced in the bolus‐only arm. Conclusions: Withholding abciximab post‐bolus infusion in patients receiving high loading dose clopidogrel does not impair platelet inhibition throughout 24 h, and has the potential to improve the safety profile of the drug at reduced costs.     

The Residual Platelet Aggregation after Deployment of Intracoronary Stent (PREDICT) score.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest a high interindividual variability of response to clopidogrel associated with adverse cardiovascular outcome. Different clinical factors are considered to influence a persistent residual platelet aggregation (RPA) despite conventional antiplatelet therapy. OBJECTIVES: To investigate clinical factors that affect RPA after 600-mg clopidogrel loading in a large unselected cohort of patients with symptomatic CAD. METHODS: The study population included a consecutive cohort of 1,092 patients treated with coronary stenting for stable angina and acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Residual platelet activity was assessed by ADP (20 micromol L(-1))-induced platelet aggregation >or= 6 h after LD. Eleven clinical factors were included in the primary analysis. RESULTS: In multivariate regression analysis increased RPA was significantly influenced by ACS, reduced LV-function, diabetes mellitus, renal failure (creatinine > 1.5 mg dL(-1)), and age > 65 years. In a factor-weighed model the risk for high RPA increased with higher score levels (OR for patients with a score of 1-3, 1.21, 95% CI 0.7-2.1; score 4-6, OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.17-3.5; P = 0.01; score 7-9, OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.8-6.0). During a 30-day follow-up the incidence of major adverse events was higher in patients with RPA in the upper tertile (4.8% vs. 2.5% in the 2nd and 1.5% in the 1st tertile; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The PREDICT score provides a good tool to estimate residual platelet activity after clopidogrel LD by easily available patient details. Additionally, we demonstrate its association with short-term outcome. Thus, patients with a high score may benefit from intensified antiplatelet therapy by improved platelet inhibition and risk reduction for thromboischemic events.     

Type IIB von Willebrand factor with normal sialic acid content induces platelet aggregation in the absence of ristocetin. Role of platelet activation, fibrinogen, and two distinct membrane receptors.

Three preparations of purified von Willebrand factor (vWF), obtained from unrelated patients affected by type IIB von Willebrand disease, were found to have normal sialic acid content (between 129 and 170 nmol/mg of vWF, as compared with 158 +/- 17 nmol/mg in four normal preparations) and to induce platelet aggregation in the presence of physiologic levels of divalent cations and without addition of ristocetin. A monoclonal antibody that blocks the vWF binding domain of the platelet glycoprotein (GP)Ib caused complete inhibition of IIB vWF-induced aggregation. In contrast, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the receptor for adhesive proteins on the platelet GPIIb/IIIa complex failed to inhibit the initial response of platelets to high concentrations of IIB vWF. Moreover, IIB vWF caused agglutination of formalin-fixed platelets that was blocked only by the anti-GPIb antibody, suggesting that the binding of vWF to GPIb, even in the absence of ristocetin, results in platelet-platelet interaction that is followed by exposure of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors for adhesive proteins. Endogenous ADP, normally active platelet metabolism and fibrinogen binding to GPIIb/IIIa were necessary for maximal and irreversible platelet aggregation. In the absence of fibrinogen, however, aggregation was mediated by vWF binding to GPIIb/IIIa. A 52/48-kD tryptic fragment containing the GPIb binding domain of normal vWF completely blocked the aggregation induced by all three IIB vWF preparations. The present study defines in detail the mechanisms involved in IIB vWF-induced platelet aggregation. Moreover, it establishes that the GPIb binding domain of normal and IIB vWF are closely related and that desialylation is not required for the direct interaction of IIB vWF with GPIb.     

Antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel is reduced in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest

Background

The platelet inhibitor clopidogrel is administered to patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia following cardiac arrest due to acute coronary syndromes. Interactions with proton pump inhibitors and genetics are factors with a known potential to attenuate the platelet inhibition of clopidogrel. In patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia, reduced gastrointestinal function and hypothermia may also reduce the effect of clopidogrel. To investigate the net platelet inhibition of clopidogrel, we have measured the platelet reactivity index in patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Methods and results

Twenty-five Caucasian patients treated with clopidogrel and therapeutic hypothermia were prospectively included. Therapeutic hypothermia was defined as 33-34 °C and delivered for 24 h. Clopidogrel loading doses (300-600 mg) were administered enterally the day of admission and followed by 75 mg daily. Blood samples were collected on day 1 (n = 25) and day 3 (n = 16). The samples were analysed for inhibition by clopidogrel with a vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation kit. On day 1 and day 3, platelet reactivity index was 0.77 ± 0.09 and 0.57 ± 0.16, respectively. The number of patients with a satisfactory antiplatelet effect (defined as platelet reactivity index <0.5) were 0 (0%) and 5 (31%), respectively.

Conclusion

In patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest, the effect of clopidogrel on platelets was virtually nonexistent on day 1 after administration, with some improvement on day 3.