Evaluation of complete surgical staging with pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy for improvement of survival in stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the benefits of lymphadenectomy and paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy for stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma (defined as intra-abdominal disease confined to the ovaries). METHODS: Twenty patients with stage I pure clear cell carcinoma of the ovary diagnosed between 1991 and 2001 were divided into two groups: Group A (12 patients, 1997-2001) underwent complete surgical staging including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, omentectomy, and pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, followed by paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy. Group B (8 patients, 1991-1996) underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, hysterectomy, and omentectomy without lymphadenectomy, followed by cisplatin-based chemotherapy. The survival of the two groups was compared. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were evaluated for age distribution, grade, substage, preoperative CA-125, presence or absence of endometriosis, and maximal tumor diameter. RESULTS: The estimated 4-year survival rate was 76.9%. The clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, except for lymphadenectomy and regimen of chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 36 months (range: 11-130 months), one of 12 patients in Group A had recurrence in comparison with 6 of 8 patients in Group B (P = 0.004). The estimated 3-year recurrence-free survival and 4-year overall survival for Group A was significantly greater than that for Group B (91.7 vs 33.3%, P = 0.014; 100 vs 50%, P = 0.014). Median time to recurrence was 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Complete surgical staging, including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and paclitaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy, appeared to be capable of improving survival of patients with stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma.     

A validation study of the new revised FIGO staging system to estimate prognosis for patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer

Objective

The aim of this study was to validate the role of the new FIGO staging system for estimating prognosis for patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer.

Methods

A total of 93 cases with stage IIIC were entered in this study and classified into three groups: one group of patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLX) and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (PALX) and who were for positive for pelvic node metastasis (PLNM) and negative for para-aortic node metastasis (PANM) (Group 1), one group of patients who underwent PLX alone and were positive for PLNM (Group 2) and one group of patients who underwent PLX and PALX and were positive for PANM (Group 3). Information on clinicopathologic findings and treatments was obtained from medical charts. Cox regression analysis was used to select prognostic factors.

Results

The 5-years survival rates were 89.3% in Group 1, 46.5% in Group 2 and 59.9% in Group 3. The overall survival rate in Group 1 was significantly better than that in Group 2 (p = 0.0001) and Group 3 (p = 0.0016). No significant difference in overall survival was found between Group 2 and Group 3. Age, number of metastatic lymph nodes, type of lymphadenectomy and type of adjuvant therapy were significantly and independently related to overall survival. Only when patients received PALX, PANM was a prognostic risk factor.

Conclusion

Sub-classification of stage IIIC would be functional for estimating prognosis in the revised FIGO staging system. Systematic lymphadenectomy including PALX has therapeutic significance for patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Prognosis of patients with stage IIIC endometrial cancer would depend much more on application of lymphadenectomy including PALX than nodal status.     

Current indications of lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is a tumor associated with a good prognosis as it is often diagnosed at an early stage. Up to 20 % of patients with stage I disease have a nodal involvement. Knowledge of nodal status provides important prognostic information. As preoperative assessment yields a poor value, prognostic lymphadenectomy appears to be indicated. However, therapeutic benefit of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy remains controversial. Recent randomized trials did not find any impact on survival for patients with low risk of nodal involvement. Thus, lymphadenectomy should no more be systematically performed in this low risk group. Nevertheless, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy seems to have a benefit in the high risk group, as isolated involved para-aortic nodes have been described.     

VEGF expression and the effect of NSAIDs on ascites cell proliferation in the hen model of ovarian cancer

ObjectiveTo determine if extra-peritoneal laparoscopic para-aortic (PA) lymphadenectomy allows a reliable assessment of PA nodes in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).MethodsIn October of 2005, a single surgeon began performing extra-peritoneal laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy for patients with EC. A prospective cohort study was initiated from October 2005 through October 2007. Staging of Group A included extra-peritoneal laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy, while Group B underwent staging via laparotomy.ResultsIn a 24 month period, 293 patients underwent surgical treatment for EC, 203 of them underwent complete staging as determined by previously published criteria. Extra-peritoneal laparoscopic PA lymphadenectomy to the renal veins was successful in 35/38 patients (92%). Mean BMI was 33.0 for Group A and 32.3 for Group B (p = NS). Mean EBL and hospital stay were lower in Group A compared to Group B (163 vs 373 cm³, p < 0.0001; median 2 vs 4 nights, p < 0.001). The total number of PA nodes harvested was not statistically different between Groups A and B (16.5 vs 19.6). Interestingly, in Group A the total number of PA nodes was greater for patients with BMI > 35, (21.6 vs 13.1), while in Group B fewer nodes were removed in obese patients (17.8 vs 20.5).ConclusionsExtra-peritoneal laparoscopy is a reliable method to routinely reach the level of the renal veins, even in obese patients. This approach was feasible in over 90% of unselected patients and well-tolerated.     

Para-aortic node sampling in small (3-cm or less) stage IB invasive cervical cancer.

Only 2 of 125 patients with FIGO stage IB invasive squamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix 3 cm or less in diameter who underwent exploration for radical hysterectomy, bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy, and para-aortic node sampling had metastases to the para-aortic nodes. No patient had gross para-aortic nodal involvement, and both patients with microscopic para-aortic nodal metastases had grossly positive pelvic nodal involvement. Para-aortic node sampling in patients with small stage IB cervical cancers undergoing radical hysterectomy may be restricted to patients with suspicious pelvic or para-aortic nodes.     

Para-aortic lymphadenectomy for primary fallopian tube cancer

Objective

To investigate the topography of lymph node spread and the need for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in primary fallopian tube cancer (PFTC).

Methods

Twenty-six women were diagnosed with PFTC at Cheil General Hospital and Women's Healthcare Center, Seoul, Korea, between March 1992 and November 2009. Of the 26 patients, we retrospectively analyzed 15 patients who underwent complete staging surgery, including bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.

Results

The median follow-up period was 57.9 months (range, 3-185 months) and the 5-year survival rate was 86.3%. Five (33.3%) patients were diagnosed with FIGO stage I, 1 (6.7%) with stage II, and 9 (60%) with stage III cancer. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 53.8 (range, 18-106 nodes). Four (26.7%) patients had nodal involvement: 2 patients with para-aortic lymph node involvement and 2 patients with both pelvic and para-aortic lymph node involvement. None of the patients was positive for pelvic lymph nodes alone.

Conclusion

A comprehensive para-aortic lymphadenectomy was necessary for accurate staging in PFTC.     

Lymph node spread in stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the rates and topography of pelvic and para-aortic nodal involvement in patients with stage III or IV primary peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma (PSPC). METHODS: Retrospective review of 19 women who underwent a systematic bilateral pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The overall frequency of lymph node involvement was 63% (12/19). Eighteen patients underwent complete resection of peritoneal disease. Only 4 patients underwent this procedure as part of their initial surgery (before chemotherapy). The frequency of pelvic and para-aortic metastases was 58% (11/19) and 58% (11/19), respectively. When para-aortic nodes were involved, the left para-aortic chain above the level of the inferior mesenteric artery was the site most frequently involved (72%). The event-free survival of the 18 patients without macroscopic disease at the end of debulking surgery was significantly correlated with the nodal status. None of the patients with positive nodes developed recurrent disease in abdominal nodes. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of nodal involvement in patients with PSPC is high. The topography of nodal spread is similar to that of ovarian cancer. Lymphadenectomy has a prognostic value.     

Treatment of cervical cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy versus adjuvant radiotherapy after radical hysterectomy and systematic lymphadenectomy

Aim:  To compare the clinical efficacy focused on post-treatment morbidity between adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and pelvic radiotherapy (RT) after radical hysterectomy for patients with cervical cancer.
Methods:  A total of 125 patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who underwent radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy at Hokkaido University Hospital between 1991 and 2002 were enrolled in the study for retrospective analysis. Seventy patients with recurrent risk factors, including deep stromal invasion, lymph vascular space invasion, parametrial invasion, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and bulky tumor (≥4 cm), received adjuvant therapy; 42 were treated with RT, and 28 were treated with CT. Almost all patients with multiple LNM received RT. Analyses were also performed on a subgroup of 50 patients without multiple LNM (23 RT, 27 CT). Clinical efficacy of post-treatment morbidity and survival was evaluated.
Results:  Because there were more patients with multiple LNM in the RT group, we analyzed disease-free survival in 50 patients without multiple LNM. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 82.6% with RT and 96.3% with CT ( P  = 0.16). Postoperative bowel obstruction was significantly more frequent in the RT group versus the CT ( P  = 0.007) and no-therapy ( P  = 0.0026) groups. Urinary disturbance was also more frequent in the RT group than in the CT ( P  = 0.0016) and no-therapy ( P  = 0.089) groups.
Conclusion:  CT has the equivalent therapeutic effect as RT with fewer postoperative complications for patients with intermediate risks. A prospective randomized trial is needed to compare CT combined with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to RT or chemoradiotherapy.     

Drug sensitivity-related benefit of systematic lymphadenectomy during cytoreductive surgery in optimally debulked stages IIIc and IV ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the survival experience following systematic lymphadenectomy (LNX) in conjunction with primary but optimal cytoreductive surgery in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) patients when followed by intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of all women with OC who were treated in our institution between 1992 and 2000. A total of 98 patients with stages IIIc-IV of OC underwent primary cytoreductive surgery which was 'optimal' (<1 cm residual disease). All patients subsequently received postoperative platinum-containing chemotherapy. Group I, consisting of 51 patients underwent LNX; Group II, consisting of 47 patients did not undergo LNX. The percentage of patients failing to respond to chemotherapy in each group was similar. Each group had statistically equivalent age, stage, regimens of chemotherapy performed, and all other known prognostic factors. RESULTS: No survival benefit could be seen in platinum-sensitive patients. However, in patients who failed to respond to chemotherapy, the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (42.8% vs. 14.3%) and overall survival (OS) (51.2% vs. 28.8%) was quite different. LNX significantly improved those of drug-resistant patients when optimal cytoreductive surgery was performed [P = 0.008, risk ratio (rr) = 2.675, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.251-5.724]. Cox's proportional analysis shows that LNX was one of the three most significant covariate with the tumor grade and the number of postoperative residual lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that LNX might be of benefit in patients who have optimal primary cytoreductive surgery and who do not respond to platinum-based chemotherapy.     

Value of adjuvant whole-pelvis irradiation after Wertheim hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervix with pelvic nodal metastasis: a matched-control study

In a retrospective study, 185 patients with previously untreated stage IB or IIA (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix were found to have pelvic nodal metastasis at the time of Wertheim hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Of these patients, 103 received adjuvant whole-pelvis irradiation and 82 received no adjuvant therapy. Median dose of pelvic irradiation was 5000 cGy. Among the irradiated patients, in 75% the dose was 5000 cGy or greater. Matching irradiated and nonirradiated patients according to stage, tumor size, and number and location of positive nodes yielded 60 pairs. Mean length of follow-up was 3.9 years for the 60 irradiated patients and 5.8 years for the non-irradiated patients. Kaplan-Meier overall and cancer-specific survival estimates for the two groups were not significantly different (P greater than 0.30). During the follow-up period, 21 surgery-only patients and 22 patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy had recurrence, but adjuvant radiotherapy decreased the proportion of recurrences occurring in the pelvis alone--27% compared with 67% in the surgery-only group (P = 0.01).     

Randomized study comparing two techniques of conization: cold knife versus loop excision

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS: Between October 1988 and January 1997, DNA ploidy was determined prospectively in 208 women who were staged surgically by a standard protocol that included pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Median follow-up was 48 months. RESULTS: Diploid tumors were identified in 154 (74%) patients and aneuploid tumors in 54 (26%). Patients with aneuploid tumors had a significantly higher prevalence of metastases to the cervix, adnexa, and omentum, malignant pelvic cytology, and advanced surgical stage. Patients with aneuploid tumors had a 4.5 times higher prevalence of pelvic lymph node metastases and a 5.8 times higher prevalence of para-aortic lymph node metastases. A significantly higher proportion of patients with aneuploid tumors was diagnosed with recurrent or progressive endometrial cancer (22.2 versus 6.5%, P = 0.002). Patients with aneuploid tumors had a significantly lower rate of survival from cancer death (P = 0.038) with 83% versus 94% surviving 5 years. CONCLUSION: Patients with aneuploid tumors are at high risk for lymph node metastases and should be surgically staged, including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Aneuploidy confers a risk for endometrial cancer death and these patients should be candidates for clinical trials evaluating treatment following surgery.     

Pulmonary morbidity of diaphragmatic surgery for stage III/IV ovarian cancer

Objective  To determine the morbidity of diaphragmatic peritonectomy.
Design  Prospective cohort study.
Setting  A Gynecology Department of a University Hospital.
Population  From 2005 to 2007, thirty-seven consecutive patients underwent surgery for stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer.
Methods  Patients were separated into a diaphragmatic surgery group ( n  = 18) and a control group ( n  = 19). Diaphragmatic surgery may consist of coagulation, stripping or muscle resection.
Main outcome measures  Postoperative course and outcome were analysed.
Results  Patients in group 1 (diaphragmatic surgery) underwent more intestinal resection (89% versus 37%, P  = 0.01) and pelvic (94% versus 63%, P  = 0.02) or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (94% versus 53%, P  = 0.04). Neither the mean estimated blood loss (960 ml versus 909 ml) nor the rates of intra-operative blood transfusion (11 versus 9) were significantly different between the two groups. The mean operative time was higher in group 1 (480 minutes versus 316 minutes, P  < 0.05). There were thirteen postoperative complications in group 1 and eight in group 2 ( P  = 0.065). In group 1, the main complication was pleural effusion (seven cases): four patients required secondary pleural drainage, two required only pleural puncture and one had both procedures. There were more complete cytoreduction in group 1 than in group 2 (89% versus 63%, P  = 0.068).
Conclusions  Diaphragm peritonectomies and resections are an effective way to cytoreduce diaphragm carcinomatosis and increase the rate of optimal debulking surgery. Such procedures frequently result in pleural effusion, but with no long-term morbidity.     

Interest of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage IB and II cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the interest and the potential therapeutic value of systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage Ib and II cervical carcinoma. METHODS: This was a prospective study including 421 patients with cervical cancer treated, from 1985 to 1994, by combined radiation therapy and surgery with systematic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. RESULTS: The overall rate of pelvic lymph-node involvement was 26% (106 patients), and the rate of paraaortic metastases was 8% (32 patients). Pelvic nodal involvement was unilateral in 14% (59 patients) and bilateral in 11% (47 patients). Macroscopic positive nodes were found in 12% (52 patients). In a univariate analysis, a young age (<30 years), a tumor size >/=4 cm, stage II disease, and nodal involvement were associated with significantly decreased survival. The nodal status and the characteristics of positive nodes (number and location) were the most significant prognostic factors. In the multivariate analysis, age, the tumor size, and the site of nodal involvement (pelvic or paraaortic) were prognostic factors. Three-year survival was 94% for patients with negative nodes compared to 64% for patients with positive pelvic nodes and 35% for patients with positive paraaortic nodes (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results confirm the diagnostic and prognostic value of systematic complete lymphadenectomy when planning adjuvant treatment and the therapeutic value of complete removal of bulky positive nodes.     

Prognostic significance of systematic lymphadenectomy as part of primary debulking surgery in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 189 consecutive patients with FIGO stage IIIC ovarian cancer between 2000 and 2011, who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy. All patients were classified into two groups — patients who underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and those who did not. Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

Patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy had significantly improved PFS (22 versus 9 months, p < 0.01) and OS (66 versus 40 months, p < 0.01). In patients with no gross residual disease (NGR) or residual disease 0.1-1 cm (GR-1), the median OS time of those who had lymphadenectomy was significantly longer than those who did not (86 versus 46 months, p = 0.02). However, in patients with residual disease > 1 cm (GR-B), there was no significant difference in OS according to lymphadenectomy (39 versus 40 months, p = 0.50). Among patients with NGR, the median OS time of those who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy was significantly longer than those who did not undergo lymphadenectomy (not yet reached [> 96] and 56 months, p < 0.01). No significant difference of OS between patients with and without lymphadenectomy was observed in the subgroup of patients with GR-1 (50 versus 38 months, p = 0.44). The performance of lymphadenectomy was a statistically significant and independent predictor of improved OS in addition to the status of residual disease and the performance of radical cytoreductive procedures (hazard ratio, 0.34; [95% CI, 0.23-0.52]; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Systematic lymphadenectomy may have a therapeutic value and be significantly associated with improved survival in stage IIIC ovarian cancer patients with grossly no visible residual disease.     

Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in minimizing pelvic sidewall and para-aortic failures. METHODS: Between January 1984 and December 2001, a total of 146 patients with stage III and IV endometrial cancer and lymph node metastases were treated at our institution. Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy was defined as the removal of more than 10 pelvic lymph nodes, and adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy was defined as removal of 5 or more para-aortic lymph nodes. The 24 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We assessed the ability of adequate pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, together with radiotherapy, to prevent pelvic and para-aortic recurrences. RESULTS: Of the 122 patients studied, 94 (77%) had adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and 47 (39%) had adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Pelvic radiotherapy was administered to 78% and para-aortic radiotherapy to 29% of patients. Median follow-up of censored patients was 56 months. Twenty-five percent of patients had pelvic sidewall failure at 5 years. Pelvic sidewall failures at 5 years occurred in 57% of patients who had inadequate node dissection and/or no radiotherapy, compared with 10% for those having both adequate lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy (P < 0.001). After risk factor assessment in a regression model, only treatment with adequate lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy was a significant independent predictor of pelvic control (P = 0.03). The performance of definitive pelvic lymphadenectomy may have increased treatment-related morbidity in the subgroup of patients who had postoperative radiotherapy. For the 41 patients with positive para-aortic lymph nodes, the 5-year para-aortic failure rate was 34% after adequate lymphadenectomy but without adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy. Likewise, 69% failed in the para-aortic area when adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy was administered to patients not having adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy; however, none of the 11 patients failed in the para-aortic area after adequate lymphadenectomy and para-aortic radiotherapy (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Adequate (pelvic and para-aortic) lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy appear complementary in reducing failures in both the pelvis and para-aortic areas in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer.     

A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Thirty-three institutions collaborating in the Gynecologic Oncology Group gathered surgical and pathological data on 1125 patients with primary, previously untreated, histologically confirmed stage I cervical carcinoma with more than 3 mm of invasion who were selected to undergo radical hysterectomy and paraaortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Of the 940 eligible, evaluable patients, 732 had squamous carcinoma. Of the study group, 87 (12%) did not undergo radical hysterectomy because of gross disease beyond the uterus or microscopic aortic node involvement documented at exploratory laparotomy. Among the 645 patients undergoing pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy and radical hysterectomy, five risk factors were significantly associated with microscopic pelvic lymph node metastasis: depth of invasion (P = 0.0001), parametrial involvement (P = 0.0001), capillary-lymphatic space invasion (P = 0.0001), tumor grade (P = 0.01), and gross versus occult primary tumor (P = 0.009). The factors identified as independent risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis by multivariate analysis were capillary-lymphatic space involvement (P less than 0.0001), depth of invasion (P less than 0.0001), parametrial involvement (P = 0.0005), and age (P = 0.02). The model was used to predict the chance of a patient having nodal metastasis for any combination of risk factors.     

伴有淋巴结转移的ⅠB1～ⅡA2期宫颈癌两种治疗方式的回顾性研究

目的:比较盆腔淋巴结切除术中病理检查证实有淋巴结转移的ⅠB1~ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者系统盆腔淋巴结切除术+同步放化疗与广泛子宫切除+系统盆腔淋巴结切除术+同步放化疗两种手术方式的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2007年10月至2016年3月在北京大学肿瘤医院治疗的盆腔淋巴结切除术中病理检查证实有淋巴结转移的ⅠB1~ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者44例的临床资料。19例患者在行系统淋巴结切除术后行同步放化疗治疗(放化疗组);25例患者在系统盆腔淋巴结切除术后继续行广泛子宫切除术,术后行辅助同步放化疗(根治手术组)。比较两种治疗方式患者的无进展生存情况和安全性。结果:44例患者中7例失访,中位随访时间为20月(4~90月)。放化疗组中,1例(1/15,6.7%)复发并死亡;根治手术组中,7例(7/22,31.8%)复发,3例(3/22,13.6%)死亡。放化疗组和根治手术组的无进展生存期中位数分别为49月(95%CI 29.216~68.784)、20月(95%CI17.682~22.318),差异无统计学意义(P=0.120)。放化疗组的2年无进展生存率为79.4%,根治手术组为36.2%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.020);1年无进展生存率差异无统计学意义(P=0.683)。发生Ⅲ~Ⅳ度不良反应放化疗组4例(26.7%),根治手术组7例(31.8%),两组差异无统计学意义(P=0.516)。结论:对于伴有淋巴结转移的ⅠB1~ⅡA2期宫颈癌患者,行系统淋巴结切除术后行同步放化疗的治疗方式与在系统盆腔淋巴结切除术后继续行广泛子宫切除术,术后行同步放化疗的治疗方式相比,安全性相当,而预后和生存结果似乎更好,但尚需大样本量的前瞻性研究证实。     

Early ovarian cancer: Is there a role for systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy?

Baiocchi G, Raspagliesi F, Grosso G, Fontanelli R, Cobellis L, di Re E, di Re F. Early ovarian cancer: Is there a role for systematic pelvis and para-aortic lymphadenectomy? Int J Gynecol Cancer 1998; 8 : 103–108.
In order to focus on the incidence and the clinical significance of lymphatic spread in patients with cancer apparently confined to the ovaries, we present our 20 year experience in a large series of patients with early ovarian cancer who had systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. A retrospective study of 280 consecutive patients is presented. Systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in 205 cases (73.2%). Selective sampling and node biopsy were performed in 30 (10.7%) and 7 (2.5%), respectively. Node metastases were found in 32/242 patients (13.2%). The incidence of metastatic nodes was significantly higher in patients with serous adenocarcinomas and/or poorly-differentiated tumors. When few nodes were involved (1–3) lymphatic spread was most ipsilateral to the tumor. Even though the retrospective nature of the study has to be considered, univariate analysis revealed statistically significant differences in 5-year survival based on FIGO stage, histology, grade of differentiation, and node status. By contrast, using multivariate analysis, none of these risk factors was an independent variable for predicting long-term survival. However, node status closely approached the statistically significant level ( P = 0.06). Only prospective and randomized studies can clarify the role of lymphadenectomy in early ovarian cancer. However, while awaiting these results, this surgical procedure should be a part of a research protocol.     

Lymph node involvement in primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube

Although the bad prognosis of primary fallopian tube carcinoma has been mostly ascribed to early lymphogenous dissemination, precise information regarding the characteristics of retroperitoneal spread are still missing. Our study was designed to evaluate the incidence and clinical significance of lymph node metastases in 33 patients with primary carcinoma of the fallopian tube. During primary surgery nine patients (27%) were submitted to systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, whereas 24 received lymph node sampling. The clinicopathologic characteristics of the patients (intraperitoneal spread, grading, peritoneal cytology, depth of tubal infiltration and residual disease after primary surgery) were compared with lymphnodal status.
Overall 15 patients (45%) had positive nodes, that is, invaded by tumor; whereas 18 (55%) showed no lymphatic spread. Six patients (40%) had exclusively positive para-aortic lymph nodes; five (33%) had only tumor metastases in pelvic lymph nodes, three (20%) manifested simultaneously pelvic and para-aortic spread, and one patient with pure primary squamous cell carcinoma had a massive groin node metastasis as presenting sign of the tumor. The rate of lymphogenous metastases was not significantly related to progressive intra-abdominal dissemination, histologic grade or depth of tubal infiltration. On the other hand, the presence of residual disease after primary surgery and positive peritoneal cytology significantly increased the risk of nodal metastases. Patients with lymph node metastasis had a significantly ( P = 0.02) worse prognosis compared with patients without nodal involvement (median survival 39 vs 58 months).
Considering the high incidence of lymph node metastasis, correct staging of tubal carcinoma should include a thorough surgical evaluation of both pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes. The role of systematic lymph node dissection in the treatment of tubal carcinoma remains controversial.     

Comparison of clinical versus surgical staging systems in vulvar cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare prognostic information from the new surgical staging system of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) with the old clinical staging system for vulvar cancer. METHODS: One hundred six women with previously untreated squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva who underwent radical vulvectomies and inguinal lymph node dissections at the University of Oklahoma from 1971-1990 were considered eligible for this study. A retrospective chart review was conducted to assign surgical stage. The clinical and pathologic factors analyzed for survival included the clinical and surgical stage of disease, nodal status, tumor size, and lesion location. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival was 64%. Forty-three patients had inguinal and femoral node metastasis with a 5-year survival of 38%, versus 87% for patients without nodal metastasis (P < .00001). An increased number of positive groin lymph nodes was associated with a poorer prognosis. Thirty-one patients had tumors of 2 cm or less in maximum diameter with no recurrences, versus 52% 5-year survival in the remaining patients (P < .001). Perineal involvement was identified in 24 patients, but did not significantly influence survival. CONCLUSION: Overall, the new classification system revised by FIGO for vulvar cancer staging places patients into more accurate risk categories.