Clinical significance of C4d deposition in stable renal allografts in the early post‐transplantation period

Abstract: The clinical significance of C4d positivity in patients with stable graft function is undetermined. This study evaluated the clinical outcome of protocol biopsy‐proven C4d‐positive renal transplants with stable graft function in the early post‐transplantation period. Protocol biopsies (n = 79) were performed on stable allografts on the 14th post‐transplant day, and indication biopsies (n = 74) were performed on dysfunctioning allografts within one yr after transplantation. Clinical and histological findings, graft function and graft survival rates were compared between C4d‐positive and C4d‐negative grafts in each group. The incidence of C4d positivity was 5.1% in protocol biopsies and 9.5% in indication biopsies. In protocol biopsies, C4d‐positive allografts showed minimal tubulointerstitial inflammation, and the graft function and graft survival rate did not differ from C4d‐negative allografts. All C4d‐positive allografts maintained stable graft function without anti‐rejection therapy, and follow‐up biopsies of two patients showed no C4d deposition or evidence of rejection. On the other hand, C4d‐positive allografts in indication biopsies showed severe tissue injury, and the graft survival rate was significantly lower than C4d‐negative allografts. In conclusion, C4d‐positive allografts with stable graft function in the early post‐transplantation period take an indolent course.     

Endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior kidney allograft outcome independently of cellular rejection.

BACKGROUND: Capillary deposition of complement split product C4d has been suggested to be a valuable marker for humoral rejection. In this retrospective study we evaluated the clinical impact of C4d deposition in renal allografts with special emphasis on associations between C4d staining patterns and histological features of acute rejection. METHODS: One hundred and two allograft biopsies obtained from 61 kidney transplants (1-532 days after transplantation; median 14 days) were examined by immunohistochemistry on routine paraffin sections using a novel anti-C4d polyclonal antibody (C4dpAb). RESULTS: Fourty-two of 102 biopsies showed endothelial C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC). Histopathological analysis revealed a significantly lower frequency of positive C4d staining in biopsies with rather than in those without acute cellular rejection defined by the Banff grading schema (P<0.01). For clinical evaluation, patients were classified according to C4d staining in allografts (C4d(PTC) positive in at least one biopsy, n=31 vs C4d(PTC) negative in all biopsies, n=30). C4d(PTC) positive patients had significantly higher serum creatinine levels than C4d negative patients. Even in the absence of morphological evidence for rejection, differences in serum creatinine levels between C4d(PTC) positive and negative recipients were significant (6 months: 2.01+/-0.75 vs 1.41+/-0.27 mg/dl; 12 months: 1.95+/-0.60 vs 1.36+/- 0.34 mg/dl; 18 months: 1.98+/-0.50 vs 1.47+/-0.31 mg/dl; P<0.05). All patients with rejection resistant to conventional therapy (n=4) were in the C4d(PTC) positive subgroup. All recipients with panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >50% (n=8) were C4d(PTC) positive. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that endothelial C4d deposition is associated with inferior graft outcome. We provide evidence that this immunohistochemical finding and its clinical impact are not associated with morphological signs of cellular rejection.     

Histologic Findings of Antibody-Mediated Rejection in ABO Blood-Group-Incompatible Living-Donor Kidney Transplantation

The purpose of this study was to characterize the histology of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in ABO blood-group-incompatible (ABOI) kidney transplants as well as on protocol biopsies performed at the time of stable allograft function. Between 5/99 and 1/02, we performed 32 ABOI kidney transplants (13 A2, 19 non-A2 blood-group living donors). Nineteen biopsies were performed for allograft dysfunction, and 127 protocol biopsies were performed 0, 3, 7, 14, 28 days and 3 and 12 months post transplant. Twenty-five of 32 patients have functioning allografts (mean 585 days post transplant). Nine of 32 (28%) developed clinical AMR. Biopsy revealed glomerular thrombi (78%), mesangiolysis (78%), peritubular capillary C4d staining (56%) and neutrophil infiltration (67%), interstitial hemorrhage and necrosis (56%) and arteriolar thrombi (33%). Subclinical AMR was diagnosed by protocol biopsies in four patients. Findings consisted of glomerular thrombi (100%), mesangiolysis (25%), and C4d staining (100%). In late protocol biopsies performed 214-420 days post transplant, mild mesangiolysis was seen in 2/17 (11.7%), and C4d immunostaining was detected in 3/12 (25%). AMR is characterized by glomerular thrombi, mesangiolysis, peritubular capillary neutrophil infiltration interstitial hemorrhage, necrosis, and C4d deposition. Glomerular thrombi appear early in AMR and may appear prior to graft dysfunction.     

Acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation: II. Morphology, immunopathology, and pathologic classification

The incidence of acute humoral rejection (AHR) in renal allograft biopsies has been difficult to determine because widely accepted diagnostic criteria have not been established. C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) of renal allografts has been proposed as a useful marker for AHR. This study was designed to test the relative value of C4d staining, histology, and serology in the diagnosis of AHR. Of 232 consecutive kidney transplants performed at a single institution from July 1995 to July 1999, all patients (n = 67) who developed acute rejection within the first 3 mo and had a renal biopsy with available frozen tissue at acute rejection onset, as well as posttransplant sera within 30 d of the biopsy, were included in this study. Hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid-Schiff stained sections were scored for glomerular, vascular, and tubulointerstitial pathology. C4d staining of cryostat sections was done by a sensitive three-layer immunofluorescence method. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) were detected in posttransplant recipient sera using antihuman-globulin-enhanced T cell and B cell cytotoxicity assays and/or flow cytometry. Widespread C4d staining in PTC was present in 30% (20 of 67) of all acute rejection biopsies. The initial histologic diagnoses of the C4d(+) acute rejection cases were as follows: AHR only, 30%; acute cellular rejection (ACR) and AHR, 45%; ACR (CCTT types 1 or 2) alone, 15%; and acute tubular injury (ATI), 10%. The distinguishing morphologic features in C4d(+) versus C4d(-) acute rejection cases included the following: neutrophils in PTC, 65% versus 9%; neutrophilic glomerulitis, 55% versus 4%; neutrophilic tubulitis, 55% versus 9%; severe ATI, 75% versus 9%; and fibrinoid necrosis in glomeruli, 20% versus 0%, or arteries, 25% versus 0%; all P < 0.01. Mononuclear cell tubulitis was more common in the C4d(-) group (70% versus 100%; P < 0.01). No significant difference between C4d(+) and C4d(-) acute rejection was noted for endarteritis, 25% versus 32%; interstitial inflammation (mean % cortex), 27.2 +/- 27% versus 38 +/- 21%; interstitial hemorrhage, 25% versus 15%; or infarcts, 5% versus 2%. DSA were present in 90% (18 of 20) of the C4d(+) cases compared with 2% (1 of 47) in the C4d(-) acute rejection cases (P < 0.001). The pathology of the C4d(+) but DSA(-) cases was not distinguishable from the C4d(+), DSA(+) cases. The C4d(+) DSA(-) cases may be due to non-HLA antibodies or subthreshold levels of DSA. The sensitivity of C4d staining is 95% in the diagnosis of AHR compared with the donor-specific antibody test (90%). Overall, eight grafts were lost to acute rejection in the first year, of which 75% (6 of 8) had AHR. The 1-yr graft failure rate was 27% (4 of 15) for those AHR cases with only capillary neutrophils versus 40% (2 of 5) for those who also had fibrinoid necrosis of arteries. In comparison, the 1-yr graft failure rates were 3% and 7%, respectively, in ACR 1 (Banff/CCTT type 1) and ACR 2 (Banff/CCTT type 2) C4d(-) groups. A substantial fraction (30%) of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes have a component of AHR as judged by C4d staining; most (90%), but not all, have detectable DSA. AHR may be overlooked in the presence of ACR or ATI by histology or negative serology, arguing for routine C4d staining of renal allograft biopsies. Because AHR has a distinct therapy and prognosis, we propose that it should be classified separately from ACR, with further sub-classification into AHR 1 (neutrophilic capillary involvement) and AHR 2 (arterial fibrinoid necrosis).     

Incidence and importance of c4d deposition in renal allograft dysfunction

Recent studies showed that peritubular capillary deposition of C4d is a marker of humoral immune responses directed against a renal allograft. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the incidence, clinical features, and prognostic implications of C4d deposition in renal allograft biopsy specimens. The biopsies had been performed due to acute graft dysfunction. This study of 104 renal allograft biopsies performed in 2004 classified histopathological findings according to Banff criteria. All paraffin-embedded biopsy samples were stained with an immunohistochemical method for C4d deposition. Demographic data, clinical findings, and biochemical findings were obtained from patients' charts. C4d staining was positive in 15/104 (14%) samples. The staining pattern was diffuse in 8 and focal in 7 patients. Nine patients were males. The overall mean age was 33 +/- 6 years. Ten received live-donor grafts. The biopsy occurred at a mean of 1007 +/- 1415 (range, 15-4712) days after the operation with a mean serum creatinine (SCr) level of 2.8 +/- 1.5 (1.25-6.0) mg/dL. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the occurrence time: early (before 100 days) and late (after 100 days). Among the early group (n = 5), the mean SCr level was 2.8 +/- 1.5 mg/dL; a diffuse staining pattern was seen in 4 (80%) patients. Histological findings were acute rejection in 3, borderline changes in 1, or thrombotic microangiopathy in 1 patient. Two patients were treated with pulse steroids and 3 with ATG, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis. Three patients lost their grafts at the mean of 118 +/- 100 days after the biopsy. In the late group (n = 10), the mean SCr level was 2.8 +/- 1.7 mg/dL with a diffuse staining pattern in 4 (40%) patients. The histological findings included acute rejection in 6, chronic vascular rejection in 2, thrombotic microangiopathy in 1, and chronic allograft nephropathy in 1 patient. Six patients were treated with pulse steroids, and 3 with ATG and intravenous immunoglobulin. Five patients lost their grafts at a mean of 200 +/- 270 days. The overall incidence of C4d deposition was 14%; it was seen both in the early and late posttransplantation period. Although a diffuse staining pattern was more frequently seen in the early period, C4d deposition indicated a poor allograft prognosis in both periods. Introduction of C4d staining into the routine may guide more specific treatments directed toward the humoral alloresponse.     

Peritubular capillary C4d deposition and renal outcome in post-transplant IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUNDS: Immunological staining of the transplanted kidney for C4d in peritubular capillaries (C4d(PTC)) has emerged as a useful method to detect antibody-mediated rejection in situ. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the prevalence of C4d(PTC) deposition in allograft renal biopsies diagnosed of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) and analysed its clinical significance. METHOD: Sixty-six biopsy specimens of post-transplant IgAN, which were obtained to evaluate azotemia and/or heavy proteinuria, were examined by immunohistochemical staining of the paraffin sections with polyclonal antibody for C4d. RESULTS: C4d was stained positively in peritubular capillaries in 16 (24%) of the 66 cases. The C4d(PTC)-negative (n=50) and C4d(PTC)-positive groups (n=16) were not different in recipient gender, age, donor age, type of donor (living vs. cadaveric), interval from transplantation to graft biopsy (41.6+/- 21.8 vs. 48.3+/-26.1 months) and post-biopsy follow-up period (60.3+/-23.3 vs. 56.9+/-25.4 months). During the follow-up period, 12 of 50 (24%) although the incidence of graft failure was not different by the C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries, intervals from renal biopsy to graft failure tended to be shorter in C4d(PTC)-positive cases than C4d(PTC)-negative cases. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the renal allograft function of the C4d(PTC)-positive group deteriorated more rapidly than that of the C4d(PTC)-negative group (p<0.05). Histologically, the C4d(PTC)-positive group had findings suggestive of acute cellular rejection more commonly than the C4d(PTC)-negative group (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence of humoral rejection, as demonstrated by C4d(PTC) deposition, was concurrently present in significant portions of post-transplant IgAN biopsy specimens and was associated with more rapid deterioration of renal function. These results suggest that C4d(PTC) positivity needs to be determined at the time of biopsy even in cases of post-transplant glomerulonephritis and immunosuppression may need to be modified accordingly.     

C4d staining of perioperative renal transplant biopsies

BACKGROUND: Deposition of C4d in peritubular capillaries (PTCs) has been shown to be a sensitive marker for antibody-mediated (humoral) rejection in renal transplant biopsies. Some studies also suggest that C4d in PTCs is specific for humoral rejection or, at least, for the presence of donor-specific antibodies. However, in other studies, PTC C4d deposits were noted in more than 40% of renal transplant biopsies performed for graft dysfunction and capillary C4d deposition in heart transplants may result from ischemic injury. METHODS: To test the specificity of C4d staining as a marker for acute humoral rejection ACR in renal allografts, indirect immunofluorescence using a monoclonal anti-C4d antibody and a fluorescein-isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody was performed on cryostat sections of 90 renal transplant biopsies, including 35 pairs of preimplantation and 1-hr postreperfusion biopsies of the same graft, postreperfusion biopsies of 12 additional grafts, and 8 positive controls (biopsies with known C4d-positive AHR). Eighteen grafts were cadaveric, 17 grafts were liviing-related, and 12 grafts were living-unrelated (excluding controls). Included in these grafts were 13 grafts that developed AHR 3 to 34 days posttransplantation. RESULTS: Only 2 of 82 perioperative biopsies showed C4d staining in PTCs. Both perioperative biopsies were postreperfusion biopsies of grafts diagnosed with AHR 5 and 34 days posttransplantation, respectively, and, in each case, the recipient had been treated with plasmapheresis before transplantation because of a positive crossmatch (cytotoxic and flow cytometric) and continued to have a weakly positive flow crossmatch at the time of transplantation. In one biopsy, C4d staining was focal, and in the other biopsy, it was diffuse; in both biopsies, C4d staining was relatively mild (1+ on a 0-4+ scale). No C4d staining was noted on preimplantation biopsies of each graft. All biopsies that contained glomeruli showed linear capillary loop or blotchy mesangial staining, or both, which was similar in prereperfusion and postreperfusion biopsies. All positive controls showed diffuse C4d staining in PTCs.CONCLUSIONS: C4d staining in PTCs may be seen as early as 1 hr posttransplantation in some recipients with low levels of antidonor antibodies. However, this was not observed as a feature of ischemic or ischemia-reperfusion injury in perioperative renal transplant biopsies, including those of cadaveric grafts with cold ischemia times of as long as 41 hr.     

Focal peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute rejection.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition has been shown to be associated with relatively poor graft outcome. The significance of focal PTC C4d staining in the early post-transplant period is uncertain. METHODS: Sixty-five biopsies from 53 patients with acute rejection were graded (Banff '97 criteria), stained for C4d, monocytes and T cells, and divided into three groups according to PTC C4d: (i) focal C4d (F) (14 biopsies, 14 patients), (ii) diffuse C4d (D) (23 biopsies, 15 patients) and (iii) no C4d (N) (28 biopsies, 24 patients). The three groups were compared with respect to a variety of biopsy and clinical parameters including outcome. RESULTS: The incidence of transplant glomerulitis and glomerular monocyte infiltration were significantly greater in F (64% and 2.0+/-2.0) and D (57% and 3.4+/-2.0) than in N (11% and 0.2+/-0.2). A significantly higher proportion of F (93%) demonstrated acute cellular rejection (Banff '97 grade > or = 1A) than did D (35%). The F and D groups included significantly more females (50 and 67%, respectively) than did N (21%). The percentage of patients with a second or third transplant was higher in F (29%) and D (40%) than in N (8%) (P = 0.0589). The proportion of patients with glomerular filtration rate < 30 ml/min at 12, 24 and 48 months was higher in the D and F groups than in the N, and there was a statistically significant increasing trend in odds of this outcome occurring at 48 months across the three groups (D > F > N group) (P = 0.0416). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the biopsy findings and clinical course in patients with focal PTC C4d staining are similar to those associated with diffuse C4d.     

Combined immunosuppression with cyclosporine (neoral) and SDZ RAD in non-human primate lung transplantation: systematic pharmacokinetic-based trials to improve efficacy and tolerability

BACKGROUND: We studied the efficacy and tolerability of combined immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine A microemulsion (Neoral) plus the macrolide SDZ RAD 40-0 (2-hydroxyethyl) rapamycin (RAD) in a stringent cynomolgus monkey lung graft model in comparison with cyclosporine or SDZ RAD monotherapy. METHODS: Thirty-nine cynomolgus monkeys received mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) mismatched unilateral lung transplants. Immunosuppressants were administered orally as single daily doses. The observation period was 28 days and follow-up included serial trough blood drug concentrations measured by high performance liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, blood analyses, chest radiographs, open lung biopsies, as well as tissue drug concentrations and graft histology at necropsy. RESULTS: Graft biopsies in monkeys treated with vehicle (n=4), Neoral (day 1-7: 150 mg/kg/day; day 8-28: 100 mg/kg/day; n=6; mean +/- SE trough level (MTL): 292+/-17 ng/ml) or SDZ RAD monotherapy (1.5 mg/kg/day; n=6; MTL: 15+/-1 ng/ml) showed severe rejection. Coadministration in two transplant monkeys of Neoral (150/100 mg/kg/day) and SDZ RAD (1.5 mg/kg/day) caused their early death. In both animals, SDZ RAD blood levels were more than 5-fold higher than under monotherapy (MTL: 82+/-18 ng/ml). Simultaneous administration (n=6) of Neoral (150/100 mg/kg/day; MTL: 217+/-16 ng/ml) and SDZ RAD (0.3 mg/kg/day; MTL: 24+/-2 ng/ml) improved graft outcome (mild rejection). Side effects included renal failure (n=2) and seizures (n=1). Three monkeys survived to day 28. In this group the MTL for cyclosporin was 143+/-13 and for RAD 38+/-3.Staggered treatment completely prevented rejection in four of six grafts. However, five of six monkeys had moderate to severe diarrhea. In a concentration-controlled trial of simultaneously administered Neoral and SDZ RAD in transplant monkeys (target SDZ RAD MTL: 20-40 ng/ml; cyclosporine MTL: 100-200 ng/ml) all six monkeys survived with improved drug tolerability and an average biopsy score of mild rejection. CONCLUSION: Combination of orally administered SDZ RAD and Neoral showed excellent immunosuppressive efficacy in a stringent lung transplant model. The drug interaction and the narrow therapeutic index of this drug combination required careful dose adjustments to optimize tolerability and efficacy.     

C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies

BACKGROUND: Deposition of the complement protein C4d in renal allograft biopsies obtained during graft dysfunction and rejection has been proposed to be a sensitive marker of antibody-mediated acute rejection. To determine the diagnostic specificity of C4d deposition, it is important to study biopsies from allografts with no evidence of dysfunction. In this study, we examined C4d deposition in protocol biopsies obtained irrespective of clinical status. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed on routine protocol biopsies preimplantation and on day 7 posttransplantation from 48 unselected renal allografts. Serum samples obtained up to 1 month after transplantation were assayed for donor-reactive antibodies (DRA). Results were correlated with histopathology and clinical outcome measures. RESULTS: Diffuse C4d deposition was detected in the peritubular capillaries of 6 of 48 (13%) biopsies. C4d deposition was present in 5 of 15 (33%) biopsies that showed acute rejection (Banff 97, category 4) but only in 1 of 33 (3%) biopsies with no rejection (P=0.003, 97% specificity). Posttransplant DRAs were detected in 21 of 48 (44%) patients. All five recipients with C4d deposition and rejection had posttransplant DRA; the recipient whose biopsy showed C4d positivity, but not rejection, did not have detectable DRA. C4d deposition was not treated with plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin and was not associated with poor posttransplant graft outcome at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in early posttransplant protocol biopsies, C4d is a specific marker for the presence of humoral rejection, as indicated by its association with DRA and acute histologic rejection.     

Sirolimus-based triple immunosupression with antithymocyte globulin induction in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Target of rapamycin inhibitors have presented similar graft and patient outcomes with no evidence of drug-induced nephrotoxicity when compared with calcineurin inhibitors. The principal aim of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy of sirolimus-based triple immunosuppression with antithymocyte globulin induction in expanded donor kidney transplantation. METHODS: Twenty-seven primary expanded criteria donor kidney transplant recipients were recruited. The severity of kidney damage was qualified by zero-hour biopsies. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1 year to assess the chronic allograft damage. Death, graft function, proteinuria and adverse events were systematically analysed during the study period. RESULTS: The mean follow up was 20.2 months. Patient and graft survival was 100% with a mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 53.1+/-4.9 mL/min at last follow up. The cumulative incidence of acute rejection was 11% at the last follow up. At 1 year, mean creatinine, GFR and proteinuria were 1.84 mg/dL, 52.3 mL/min, 651.5 mg/day, respectively. Four patients required surgical intervention due to urinary complications and recovered successfully. Two patients developed acute graft dysfunction due to acute tubular necrosis which was presumably drug related. Ten patients developed relapsing urinary tract infections and three patients had pneumonia. No infectious death occurred throughout the study period. Baseline renal structure was preserved in 13 biopsies at 1 year post transplant. Five patients demonstrated progressive but mild tubular atrophy or interstitial fibrosis in their protocol biopsies. The mean chronic allograft damage index scores at baseline and at 1 year from biopsy were 2.57+/-0.23 and 2.83+/-0.23, respectively (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose sirolimus-based triple immunosuppression with antibody induction offered a safe clinical outcome in expanded criteria donor kidneys with the achievement of stable renal function and favourable recipient outcomes throughout the short term. However, mild progression of histological damage and increased risk of bacterial infection are a major concern. Additionally, the benefit (if any) of the low acute rejection rate on long-term graft outcome is still undetermined.     

Peritubular capillary C4d staining in late acute renal allograft rejection – is it relevant?

Abstract: Background: In the early post-transplant period, renal allograft rejection with diffuse peritubular capillary (PTC) C4d deposition predicts poor graft survival. In the late post-transplant setting, that is, one or more yr after transplantation, the implication of diffuse PTC C4d deposition is still a topic of debate. The purpose of our study was to see if diffuse PTC C4d deposition, in late acute rejection (LAR), occurring more than one yr post-transplant, has any impact on graft survival and function. Methods: We selected cases, both cadaveric as well as living donor renal transplant recipients, in whom acute rejection with PTC C4d deposition was first detected after the first year post-transplant. Recipients with multiple acute rejection episodes during the first year post-transplant were excluded from the study. The first biopsy diagnosed with LAR was considered the index biopsy (n = 40). We formed two groups: group 1, C4d-positive LAR (n = 20), and group 2, C4d-negative LAR (n = 20). Groups were matched for maintenance and post-rejection immunosuppressive therapy, baseline serum creatinine levels before the time of the index biopsy, time from transplant to index biopsy, as well as chronic allograft damage index (CADI) score in the index biopsies. We compared the rate of graft loss, and the graft function of the surviving grafts at the end of the study period, as well as histologic parameters in the index biopsy specimens between the two groups. The mean follow-up period was 20 months. Results: No significant differences in the rate of graft loss or graft function were found between groups 1 and 2 at the end of the follow-up period. Histologically, PTC margination and transplant glomerulopathy were more common in the C4d-positive group, and this difference was statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of plasma cell infiltrates. Conclusions: Unlike in the acute setting, the presence or absence of PTC C4d staining in renal allografts with LAR may not have a predictive value regarding graft outcome.     

Outcome of untreated grade II rejection on solitary pancreas allograft biopsy specimens

BACKGROUND: The most widely used grading scheme for acute pancreas allograft rejection grades biopsy specimens from 0 (normal) to V (severe rejection). Although the more advanced grades correlate strongly with immunologic graft loss, it is unclear how lesser grades impact graft outcome. The authors therefore report the outcomes of untreated grade II (minimal) rejection of solitary pancreas biopsy specimens. METHODS: The authors retrospectively analyzed all solitary pancreas transplants performed at the Mayo Clinic between January 2001 and November 2002. The authors selected all patients who were found with grade II findings on biopsy. Whether patients underwent follow-up biopsies, what the results were, and graft survival at the end of the study period were then determined. RESULTS: A total of 88 pancreas transplants were performed; 20 pancreas transplant recipients (23%) developed grade II (minimal) rejection and were followed for a mean of 22.8+/-8.7 months. Eighteen patients underwent biopsy for protocol purposes and two patients underwent clinically indicated biopsies. Of the patients who underwent biopsy as per protocol, 15 of the patients had a total of 25 follow-up biopsies: 10 were grade 0; 3 were grade I; and 10 were unchanged (grade II). Rejection in one patient progressed to grade III and in another patient to grade IV. The three patients who did not undergo repeat biopsy had a functioning allograft pancreas at the end of the study period. Of the two patients with grade II biopsy specimens obtained for clinical reasons, one had resolution of all inflammation noted on three follow-up biopsies, and the other patient did not undergo follow-up biopsy and died with a functioning graft. CONCLUSIONS: Grade II (minimal) rejection of solitary pancreas allograft rarely progresses to more severe degrees of inflammation. Morphologic findings in this category may not have unfavorable prognoses over a period of 2 years when untreated.     

Monocytes and peritubular capillary C4d deposition in acute renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Peritubular capillary (PTC) deposition of complement split factor C4d in renal allografts has been shown to be closely associated with circulating antidonor antibodies and a marker for relatively poor graft survival. Monocyte/macrophage (MO) infiltration of renal allografts has been shown to adversely affect graft survival. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the two phenomena are related. METHODS: Twenty-three biopsies (from 15 patients) demonstrated diffuse strong staining of PTC for C4d (C4d+ group) and acute tubular injury with or without significant cellular rejection, while 28 biopsies (with acute rejection) but negative for PTC C4d served as controls (C4d- group). RESULTS: The C4d+ group demonstrated significantly greater glomerular and interstitial MO infiltration than did the C4d- group [3.4 +/- 2.0 vs. 0.2 +/- 0.3 MO/glomerulus, P < 0.0001; 12.9 +/- 9.2 vs. 6.5 +/- 5.0 MO/high power field (hpf), P = 0.0030]. Neutrophilic (PMN) infiltration of glomeruli and PTC was also significantly greater in the C4d+ group than in the C4d- one (0.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.3 PMN/glomerulus, P = 0.0003; 0.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.3 PTC PMN/hpf, P = 0.0035). CONCLUSION: The results indicate a close association between PTC C4d deposition and MO infiltration, particularly glomerular, and confirm previous observations regarding the correlation of PTC C4d staining and PMN infiltration.     

Subclinical Rejection Associated with Chronic Allograft Nephropathy in Protocol Biopsies as a Risk Factor for Late Graft Loss

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) in protocol biopsies is associated with graft loss while the association between subclinical rejection (SCR) and outcome has yielded contradictory results. We analyze the predictive value of SCR and/or CAN in protocol biopsies on death-censored graft survival. Since 1988, a protocol biopsy was done during the first 6 months in stable grafts with serum creatinine <300 micromol/L and proteinuria <1 g/day. Biopsies were evaluated according to Banff criteria. Borderline changes and acute rejection were grouped as SCR. CAN was defined as presence of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy. Mean follow-up was 91 +/- 46 months. Sufficient tissue was obtained in 435 transplants. Biopsies were classified as normal (n = 186), SCR (n = 74), CAN (n = 110) and SCR with CAN (n = 65). Presence of SCR with CAN was associated with old donors, percentage of panel reactive antibodies and presence of acute rejection before protocol biopsy. Cox regression analysis showed that SCR with CAN (relative risk [RR]: 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-3.12; p = 0.02) and hepatitis C virus (RR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.38-3.75; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of graft survival. In protocol biopsies, the detrimental effect of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy on long-term graft survival is modulated by SCR.     

小肠移植术后内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检的时机及诊断价值

目的 总结小肠移植术后内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检的时机及该技术对急性排斥反应和感染的诊断价值.方法 根据免疫抑制方案的不同,将15例小肠移植受者分为3个阶段.1994-1995年为第1阶段(3例),2003-2006年为第2阶段(7例),2007年以后为第3阶段(5例).第3阶段进行计划性内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检的监测,既术后第3天进行首次内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检,此后活检的频次在术后第1个月为2次/周,术后第2～3个月为1次/周,术后第4～6个月为1次/2周,术后7个月以后为1次/月,在受者出现排斥反应的临床症状和抗排斥反应治疗期间,也进行内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检.结果 15例共进行内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检255次,移植肠腹壁造口肉眼直视下取材活检21次.以上276份样本中,诊断排斥反应共51份(18.5%),其中诊断不确定急性排斥反应至轻度排斥反应32份(11.6%)、中度排斥反应9份(3.3%)、重度排斥反应10份(3.6%),巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染2份(0.7%),细菌感染2份(0.7%).15例共发生病理证实并需l临床治疗的排斥反应20次,其中不确定急性排斥反应至轻度排斥反应11次、中度5次、重度4次,发生细菌性和CMV肠炎各1次.结论 内镜引导下移植肠黏膜活检及其病理学检查是小肠移植术后诊断排斥反应和感染的重要手段,有计划的进行该检查对排斥反应有术后监测、早期诊断、鉴别诊断和指导治疗的价值.     

An analysis of early renal transplant protocol biopsies--the high incidence of subclinical tubulitis.

To investigate the possibility that we have been underestimating the true incidence of acute rejection, we began to perform protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation. This analysis looks at the one-week biopsies. Between March 1 and October 1, 1999, 100 adult patients undergoing cadaveric kidney or kidney/pancreas transplantation, or living donor kidney transplantation, underwent 277 biopsies. We focused on the subset of biopsies in patients without delayed graft function (DGF) and with stable or improving renal function, who underwent a biopsy 8.2+/-2.6 d (range 3-18 d) after transplantation (n = 28). Six (21%) patients with no DGF and with stable or improving renal function had borderline histopathology, and 7 (25%) had acute tubulitis on the one-week biopsy. Of the 277 kidney biopsies, there was one (0.4%) serious hemorrhagic complication, in a patient receiving low molecular weight heparin; she ultimately recovered and has normal renal function. Her biopsy showed Banff 1B tubulitis. In patients with stable or improving renal allograft function early after transplantation, subclinical tubulitis may be present in a substantial number of patients. This suggests that the true incidence of rejection may be higher than is clinically appreciated.     

Acute renal allograft rejection: diagnostic significance of focal peritubular capillary C4d

BACKGROUND: Focal PTC C4d staining in acute renal allograft rejection has not been studied extensively. METHODS: Renal allograft biopsies performed after October 2003, representing the first episode of acute rejection (AR) in recipients with > or = 12 months follow-up postbiopsy, were assessed for extent of C4d and correlated with morphology, ELISA screen, donor-specific antibodies (DSA), response to treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: In 106 biopsies (16 C4d-diffuse; 24 C4d-focal; 66 C4d-negative), there were no differences among the three groups in terms of timing or grade of AR, creatinine level, tacrolimus level, and grade of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy or graft loss. The C4d-diffuse group was significantly associated with less tubulitis (P=0.0021), and more chronic allograft arteriopathy (P=0.0527). Incomplete response to steroid therapy was more frequent in C4d-diffuse/focal compared with negative cases (P=0.0492). DSA frequency within 1 year of AR was highest in the C4d-diffuse (94%), followed by C4d-focal (38%), and C4d-negative (17%) groups (P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Focal PTC C4d was associated with circulating antibodies, with a 2-fold greater diagnostic sensitivity than negative C4d staining. The finding of diffuse C4d on follow-up biopsy was significantly associated with graft loss at 1 year, regardless of index biopsy C4d results.     

Detection of humoral rejection in human cardiac allografts by assessing the capillary deposition of complement fragment C4d in endomyocardial biopsies.

BACKGROUND: There are no well-established diagnostic criteria to detect humoral rejection in organ transplantation. The value of commonly used markers in immunohistochemistry, such as C1q, C3c, IgG, IgM and fibrinogen, is questioned by some groups. Complement fragment C4d is a more stable marker of complement activation as it is covalently bound to graft capillaries. C4d has been shown to identify clinically relevant, but otherwise undetectable humoral anti-graft reactions in human kidney transplants. METHODS: Immunohistochemical techniques were used to evaluate 155 endomyocardial biopsies from 56 heart transplant recipients less than 3 months post transplantation for the presence of capillary C4d staining. In a subset of patients, C4d staining was compared with C1q, C3c, IgM and fibrin staining and was correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS: Within 3 months 9 of 56 patients died. Five of these nonsurvivors had prominent C4d staining (p < .05), whereas C1q, C3c and IgM showed no correlation with clinical outcome. Presence of fibrin correlated with clinical outcome and C4d staining (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The capillary deposition of complement split product C4d in human endomyocardial biopsies was significantly associated with graft loss. Determination of fibrin deposition may yield additional information to establish a diagnosis of humoral rejection. The immunohistochemical assessment of capillary deposition of C4d and fibrin appears to be an appropriate tool for the identification of patients, who may require additional or alternative immunosuppressive therapy targeted against the humoral immune system.