Suppression of chronic ventricular arrhythmias with propranolol.

The antiarrhythmic efficacy of propranolol was evaluated in 32 patients with chronic high frequency ventricular arrhythmias in a placebo-controlled protocol. After a placebo control period, propranolol was begun and the dosage increased sequentially until arrhythmia suppression was achieved, side effects appeared, or a maximum dosage of 960 mg/day was reached. Computerized analysis of ambulatory recordings was used to quantify the arrhythmias. Twenty-four patients had 70--100% arrhythmia suppression at plasma levels ranging from 12--1100 ng/ml (end of dosing interval). Eight patients in this group had frequent episodes of ventricular tachycardia that were totally suppressed at or below the dosage that produced greater than or equal to 70% suppression of ventricular ectopic depolarizations (VEDs). A biphasic dose-response curve was seen in five patients who responded with a decrease in arrhythmia frequency in the lower ranges of dosages but had increased frequency of ectopic rhythms as the dosage was increased above the optimal level. Only one-third of patients responded at doses less than or equal to 160 mg/day. However, with dosages of 200--640 mg/day, an additional 40% responded. Propranolol appears to control ventricular arrhythmias safely and effectively in many patients. The finding that the antiarrhythmic effect in many patients required plasma concentrations greater than those that produce substantial beta-adrenergic blockage raises a question whether blockade of cardiac beta receptors can directly account for all of the antiarrhythmic actions of propranolol.     

Electrophysiologic effects of propranolol on the human heart

Effects of propranolol (10(-9) to 10(-4) Gm/ml) on various electrophysiologic properties of human papillary muscles obtained from patients undergoing corrective open heart surgery were studied to have an insight into the mechanism of its antiarrhythmic activity in man. Propranolol (10(-8) to 10(-6) Gm/ml) produced significant decreases in the action potential duration, effective refractory period and dv/dt of depolarization phase of action potential without significantly affecting the resting potential and amplitude of action potential. These effects were concentration dependent. High concentration (10(-4) Gm/ml) of propranolol not only produced greater decreases in the above parameters but also reduced the resting potential and amplitude of action potential. Although propranolol decreased both the action potential duration and effective refractory period, the shortening of the action potential duration was greater than the shortening of the effective refractory period. It shifted the membrane responsiveness curve to the right and down. It produced frequency dependent decreases in the dv/dt of phase 0 of action potential and the rate of repolarization. Propranolol also increased the threshold of stimulation. Propranolol produced electrophysiologic changes in the human myocardium qualitatively similar to those in canine myocardium. The probable mechanism of its antiarrhythmic activity in man has been discussed.     

Amiloride. Antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic actions in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia

This study assessed the antiarrhythmic activity of amiloride in 35 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patients had failed to respond to 3.6 +/- 1.0 antiarrhythmic drugs. Ventricular tachycardia was reproducibly induced by programmed electrical stimulation in all patients at the baseline study. Amiloride was given at 10 and 20 mg/day p.o. on a twice-daily schedule that achieved serum concentrations of 21 +/- 17 and 36 +/- 18 ng/ml, respectively. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged from 36 +/- 14% at baseline to 37 +/- 17% during amiloride treatment. Amiloride significantly increased serum potassium from 4.6 +/- 0.4 to 5.1 +/- 0.4 mM. Four patients failed amiloride therapy with spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. The remaining 31 patients were assessed by repeat programmed stimulation. Six patients had complete antiarrhythmic response, and an additional six patients had less than 15 beats of ventricular tachycardia induced. Therefore, amiloride was an efficacious antiarrhythmic treatment in 12 of 35 (34%) patients. Amiloride concentrations were significantly higher (52 +/- 20 ng/ml) in patients that responded than in patients that did not respond (30 +/- 15 ng/ml). The only electrophysiologic measurement that changed significantly was the ventricular functional refractory period (from 269 +/- 24 to 283 +/- 25 msec, p less than 0.05). Amiloride also suppressed frequent, spontaneous ventricular premature beats in eight of 15 patients (53%). No somatic side effects occurred. Two of the five patients discharged on amiloride therapy developed asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and this prompted a change in antiarrhythmic therapy. Both died suddenly of arrhythmia during substitute empiric antiarrhythmic drug therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Concentration dependence of class III and beta-adrenergic blocking effects of sotalol in anesthetized dogs

Sotalol is unique among beta-adrenergic blocking drugs in possessing significant class III antiarrhythmic actions. The present study was designed to assess the relative concentration dependence of beta-blocking and class III actions of sotalol and to relate the findings to concentrations achieved during oral sotalol therapy in humans. Measurements were made in anesthetized dogs under control conditions, and then in the presence of a series of stable sotalol plasma concentrations produced by sequential loading and maintenance infusions. Beta-blocking effects of sotalol, determined by attenuation of the chronotropic actions of isoproterenol, were seen at the lowest dose used. Increases in atrial and ventricular refractory periods (observed in dogs with autonomic blockade to exclude beta-receptor-mediated or reflex autonomic effects) required much larger doses of sotalol. Half-maximal beta-blocking effects occurred at an average sotalol concentration of 0.8 +/- 0.3 mg/liter, an order of magnitude lower than the concentrations required for half-maximal effects on atrial (6.9 +/- 1.2 mg/liter, p less than 0.01) and ventricular (6.8 +/- 2.8 mg/liter, p less than 0.05) refractoriness. These results show that substantially higher concentrations are needed for the class III effects of sotalol than for its beta-blocking action. These pharmacodynamic differences need to be considered in evaluating the antiarrhythmic efficacy and mechanisms of this unusual drug.     

The cellular electropharmacology of the simultaneous administration of propranolol and mexiletine: A class I and II antiarrhythmic drug combination

The addition of propranolol to mexiletine may reduce the adverse effects of mexiletine and possibly increase its efficacy. We compared the cellular electrophysiologic effects of this combination with mexiletine and propranolol alone, over concentration ranges of 3.2 to 100 microM mexiletine and 0.80 to 25.0 microM propranolol, using standard microelectrode techniques and a stimulation frequency of 1.5 Hz. Mexiletine and propranolol both depressed the rate of rise of phase 0 (Vmax) with concentration-response curves of similar slope and a relative potency of 8:1, propranolol to mexiletine. Thus, combinations of 8:1 molar ratios of mexiletine to propranolol were assessed. The combination depressed Vmax to the same extent as mexiletine or propranolol alone. Mexiletine, propranolol and the combination all shortened action potential duration (APD) to the same extent. At low concentration mexiletine, propranolol and the combination shortened effective refractory period (ERP). At 25 microM mexiletine, this effect reversed and ERP began lengthening. The effect of the combination paralleled mexiletine while with propranolol alone the reversal did not occur until the highest concentration was reached. Mexiletine prolonged ERP relative to APD, an effect not shared by propranolol and attenuated with the combination (P less than 0.05). We conclude that combining propranolol with mexiletine does not alter any of the cellular electrophysiologic effects of mexiletine except the prolongation of ERP relative to APD. Although this may be an important antiarrhythmic effect, the extent by which in vivo concentrations of propranolol may reduce the clinical antiarrhythmic efficacy of mexiletine is likely to be negligible.     

Electropharmacology of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: effects of class I antiarrhythmic agents, verapamil and propranolol

Forty-seven patients with spontaneous and inducible nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) underwent serial electrophysiologic studies to evaluate the effects of antiarrhythmic agents on inducible arrhythmias, the role of electrophysiologic testing in the evaluation of pharmacologic therapy for these arrhythmias, and potential mechanisms underlying these arrhythmias. Type I antiarrhythmic agents prevented induction of VT by programmed stimulation in 18 of 37 patients and by isoproterenol in 9 of 11 patients. Verapamil and propranolol did not prevent or alter the mode of induction of VT by programmed stimulation, nor did they slow the induced tachycardias. Propranolol prevented induction of VT by isoproterenol in all 14 patients tested. Type I antiarrhythmic agents converted nonsustained into sustained VT in 2 of 37 patients. Inducible VT was prevented in 88% of patients without underlying heart disease, in contrast to only 38% of patients with associated cardiac disease (p less than 0.02). This study demonstrates that electrophysiologic studies may be used to identify antiarrhythmic agents with both beneficial and potentially harmful effects in patients with nonsustained VT. The responses of inducible tachycardias to antiarrhythmic agents in this group of patients with spontaneous nonsustained VT are similar to those previously observed in patients with sustained VT. Finally, the results suggest that VT induced by isoproterenol may frequently respond to type I antiarrhythmic agents in addition to beta blockers.     

Electrophysiologic effects of epinephrine in humans

The electrophysiologic effects of circulating epinephrine in humans were examined in four study groups of 10 subjects each. In 10 subjects without structural heart disease (Group 1) and in 10 patients with coronary disease or dilated cardiomyopathy (Group 2) epinephrine infusion at 25 and 50 ng/kg body weight per min for 14 min resulted in an elevation of the plasma epinephrine concentration in the physiologic range. In both groups it produced a dose-dependent decrease in the effective refractory period of the atrium, atrioventricular (AV) node and ventricle and improvement in AV node conduction. Epinephrine facilitated the induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia in 3 of the 20 subjects. In Group 3, a beta-adrenergic blocking dose of propranolol was added to the infusion of 50 ng/kg per min of epinephrine. Propranolol not only reversed the effects of epinephrine, but also lengthened these variables compared with baseline values. In Group 4, propranolol was administered first, followed by 50 ng/kg per min of epinephrine. Propranolol alone slowed AV node conduction and mildly prolonged the refractory periods. In the presence of beta-blockade, epinephrine had no effect on AV node properties but resulted in a lengthening of the atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. In conclusion, epinephrine in physiologic doses shortens the effective refractory period of the atrium, AV node and ventricle, improves AV node conduction and may facilitate the induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia. The overall electrophysiologic effects of epinephrine result from stimulation of beta-receptors. Stimulation of alpha-receptors by epinephrine has no effect on the AV node but prolongs the effective refractory period of the atrium and ventricle, partially offsetting the shortening of refractory periods mediated by beta-receptor stimulation.     

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Ranging Study of Dofetilide in Patients with Inducible Sustained Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias

Dofetilide and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias. Introduction : Dofetilide is a new antiarrhythmic agent with potent I_k blocking properties in vitro. We developed a dose-ranging, placebo-controlled study design to define the range of effective doses and to evaluate the clinical electrophysiology of intravenous dofetilide in patients in whom sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation was reproducibly inducible at baseline electrophysiologic testing.
Methods and Results : The initial four patients received low doses that were increased in subsequent groups of four if adverse effects were absent. In each group of four patients, one patient was randomly assigned to placebo (double blind). Twenty-four patients were studied at six incremental loading and maintenance infusion regimens. Dofetilide (0.1 to 8.0 ng/ml.) produced concentration-related increases in the %δ of QT (r = 0.79, P <0.001). QT_c (r = 0.60, P =0.02), RR (r = 0.62, P < 0.02), and right ventricular effective refractory period (cycle length 600 msec; r = 0.68, P = 0.04). Placebo produced no changes in any of these measurements. Sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was no longer inducible in 1 of 6 patients receiving placebo and 8 of 18 receiving dofetilide (4 to 13 sec nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was induced in 4 of these 8). One patient developed torsades de pointes at a high concentration (5.3 ng/mL).
Conclusions : We conclude that: (1) dofetilide produces concentration-related I_g blocking effects in patients: (2) an incremental dose-ranging study design aids in identifying the range of doses demonstrating electrophysiologic effects and efficacy; (3) a concomitant placebo group provides important data to assess reproducibility of results over time; and (4) further studies of dofetilide's efficacy and toxicity should be conducted.     

In support of cardiac chronotropic beta 2 adrenoceptors

The effects of atenolol (50 mg) and propranolol (40 mg) on exercise- and isoproterenol-induced heart rate increments were studied in 9 male volunteers. Propranolol reduced maximal heart rate from 187 +/- 4 to 146 +/- 7 beats/min and atenolol reduced it to 138 +/- 6 beats/min. There was no difference between the drugs at any point during exercise. Isoproterenol sensitivity was measured as the dose of isoproterenol required to increase resting heart rate by 25 beats/min (CD-25). Propranolol increased the CD-25 from 1.8 +/- 0.3 micrograms after placebo to 39 +/- 8 micrograms and atenolol increased the CD-25 to 8 +/- 2 micrograms. The increase by propranolol was significantly greater than that of atenolol. Intravenous atropine (0.04 mg/kg) did not alter the isoproterenol CD-25 during placebo or atenolol. The CD-25 with propranolol decreased after atropine (39 +/- 8 versus 25 +/- 5 micrograms) and was due to diminished plasma propranolol concentrations as the drug sensitivity (measured by Ka) was unchanged before (12 +/- 2 ml/ng) and after (10 +/- 3 ml/ng) atropine. These data support the hypothesis that moderate exercise is primarily a beta 1-mediated response and therefore equally antagonized by cardioselective and nonselective blockers, but that isoproterenol stimulates both beta 1 and beta 2 receptors. The greater ability of the nonselective agent to antagonize isoproterenol tachycardia with no significant change after atropine suggests the presence of cardiac beta 2 chronotropic receptors. The physiologic and pathologic importance of these receptors has yet to be determined.     

Efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral nadolol for supraventricular tachycardia in children.

The efficacy and safety of oral nadolol in supraventricular tachycardia were evaluated prospectively in 27 children (median age 5.5 years). Fifteen patients had an unsuccessful trial of digoxin therapy. Intravenous nadolol was given to seven patients during electrophysiologic study; five of these had an excellent response and two had a partial response (25% decrease in tachycardia rate). Six of these patients had a similar response to oral nadolol. Twelve patients received both propranolol and nadolol. Among six patients, intravenous propranolol was successful in four and unsuccessful in two; all six had a similar response to oral nadolol. With oral propranolol, tachycardia was well controlled in four patients and persistent in two; five of five patients had a similar response to oral nadolol. Twenty-six patients were treated with oral nadolol; the arrhythmia was well controlled in 23, 2 had recurrent tachycardia and 1 patient had tachycardia at a 25% slower rate. The effective dose of nadolol ranged between 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg body weight once daily (median dose 1 mg/kg per day). During follow-up (3 to 36 months), compliance and tolerance were excellent; excluding 2 patients with reactive airway disease who developed wheezing, only 3 (12%) of 24 had side effects necessitating a change in drug therapy. Once a day nadolol is a safe and effective agent in the management of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Its long-term efficacy can be predicted by the short-term response to intravenous nadolol or propranolol during programmed electrophysiologic study.     

Which patient with sustained ventricular tachycardia is suited for long-term therapy with anti-arrhythmia drugs?]

Therapy of patients with a history of sustained ventricular tachycardia essentially depends on the type and extent of underlying cardiac disease. This survey presents older and newer results regarding the outcome of this arrhythmia in relation to QRS morphology and underlying disease: monomorphic ventricular tachycardia without underlying cardiac disease; monomorphic ventricular tachycardia on the basis of right ventricular dysplasia; monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy; polymorphic ventricular tachycardia with/without QT prolongation. Apart from complete hemodynamic evaluation of all cases with documented sustained ventricular tachycardia, programmed ventricular stimulation should be performed. Because of the excellent long-term outcome and the regularly benign clinical symptomatology, antiarrhythmic drugs are and will remain the therapy of first choice in patients without underlying cardiac disease. In exercise-induced arrhythmias, beta-blocking agents are to be used in the first place. As an exception to the general rule, special forms of ventricular tachycardia without underlying cardiac disease respond to verapamil. The clinical symptomatology during ventricular tachycardia on the basis of coronary artery disease or dilated cardiomyopathy is typically severe with a guarded outcome. Long-term therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs should be performed only when the efficacy was proved by serial electrophysiologic drug testing (suppression of inducibility of the arrhythmia). Regarding drug testing, the class III antiarrhythmic drugs sotalol and amiodarone seem to be more effective than the class I antiarrhythmic drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Quinidine for ventricular arrhythmias: value of electrophysiologic testing

Quinidine was evaluated during serial electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation in 89 patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. In 30 of the 89 patients, quinidine therapy prevented the initiation of ventricular tachycardia (VT) during programmed ventricular stimulation. In 8 additional patients no single drug tested was effective, and quinidine in combination with either mexiletine (7 patients) or propranolol (1 patient) prevented the initiation of VT during electrophysiologic testing. The mean serum concentrations of quinidine in the patients who responded and those who failed to respond were 2.9 +/- 0.8 and 2.8 +/- 1.1 micrograms/ml, respectively; however, but nonresponders were characterized by more severe congestive heart failure and an increased incidence of digitalis use. During chronic therapy (24 +/- 3 months) with quinidine either alone or in combination with a second antiarrhythmic drug in the 38 patients whose arrhythmia had been suppressed during electrophysiologic testing, 32 (84%) remain symptom-free while 3 have had recurrent arrhythmia and 3 discontinued quinidine because of adverse effects. These data demonstrate that quinidine, when selected on the basis of electrophysiologic testing, provides effective long-term prophylaxis against recurrent ventricular arrhythmia and that approximately 40% of patients tested are likely to respond either to quinidine alone or quinidine in combination with another antiarrhythmic agent.     

Protection by beta-blocking agents against free radical-mediated sarcolemmal lipid peroxidation

The effects of beta-blocking and class I antiarrhythmic agents on free radical-mediated sarcolemmal lipid peroxidation were examined. Highly purified canine myocytic sarcolemmal membranes were pretreated with 10-800 microM of selected beta-blocking (propranolol, pindolol, metoprolol, atenolol, or sotalol) and class I (quinidine, lidocaine, procainamide, or diphenylhydantoin) antiarrhythmic agents at 37 degrees C for 10 minutes. Subsequently, a superoxide radical (derived from dihydroxyfumarate) driven, Fe3+-ADP catalyzed free radical generating system was added and incubated for up to 45 minutes. Lipid peroxidation of sarcolemma was determined by malondialdehyde formation. Pretreatment of the membranes with the five beta-blockers resulted in various degrees (20-95%) of inhibition of sarcolemmal peroxidation in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. All the class I agents were less effective (less than 20% inhibition). The order of potency of the beta-blockers was propranolol greater than pindolol greater than metoprolol greater than atenolol greater than sotalol and appeared to relate to their degree of lipophilicity. Propranolol, the most potent agent, achieved half-maximal inhibition of peroxidation at about 100 microM and achieved significance (p less than 0.01) at 20 microM. At pH 6.0, the efficacy of pindolol, metoprolol, atenolol, and sotalol diminished by 30-50% compared to pH 7.2, but the potency of propranolol remained unchanged. Since increased free radical production may occur during myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, the above findings suggest that the lipophilic beta-blockers may provide additional antiperoxidative protection of ischemic tissue.     

Ethacizin: a new efficacious Soviet antiarrhythmic drug of the phenothiazine group

Ethacizin, a new Soviet antiarrhythmic agent of the phenothiazine group, was tested on 82 patients with ventricular rhythm disturbances. Antiarrhythmic effects of the drug were assessed by means of ambulatory ECG monitoring. The investigation protocol included acute drug testing with 50 mg, 100 mg, and 150 mg, and short-term maintenance therapy with 150 to 300 mg/24 hours of ethacizin (mean 183 +/- 46 mg/24 hours) for 3 to 14 days (mean 7 +/- 3 days). Ethacizin reduced the total number of ventricular premature beats (VPBs) from 17,263/24 hours (on placebo) to 3458/24 hours (p less than 0.001) and suppressed couplets and ventricular tachycardia (VT) runs by 90% in 94% and 96% of patients, respectively. Maximum blood plasma concentration of ethacizin was observed in 110 to 120 minutes and accounted for 300 to 447 ng/ml (mean 354 +/- 77 ng/ml), with a minimum therapeutic drug plasma concentration ranging from 29 to 101 ng/ml (mean 73 +/- 27 ng/ml). There was a significant increase in PQ and QRS intervals with ethacizin. Ethacizin was well tolerated. Thus ethacizin had high antiarrhythmic efficacy in patients with VPBs and no significant side effects.     

Concentration/response relations for the multiple antiarrhythmic actions of sotalol

Sotalol, one of the first beta-receptor antagonists synthesized, is a promising investigational agent with remarkable efficacy for treatment of patients with ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. Unlike other beta blockers, sotalol also possesses class III antiarrhythmic action, evidenced by prolongation of the myocardial action potential duration. This additional action probably accounts for the greater antiarrhythmic efficacy of sotalol compared with other beta blockers. Sotalol's class III antiarrhythmic action becomes apparent at concentrations higher than those necessary for significant beta-receptor antagonism, both in vitro and in human subjects. In a study correlating dosage and antiarrhythmic response with prolongation of rate-corrected QT (QTc) (a measure of class III action) and the degree of beta-receptor blockade (assessed by the reduction of the maximal exercise-induced heart rate), 11 of 17 patients had an antiarrhythmic response. Eight of these 11 responders had been unresponsive to conventional beta-receptor antagonists. The plasma concentration associated with significant QTc prolongation (2.55 micrograms/ml) was found to be much greater than that associated with 50% reduction in maximal slowing of heart rate (0.8 micrograms/ml). As with other beta-receptor antagonists, the activities of sotalol's 2 stereoisomers differ, with the I-isomer having far more beta-blocking activity. However, both isomers have equal class III antiarrhythmic activity. When increasing doses of the d-isomer of sotalol (50 to 400 mg every 12 hours) were evaluated in patients with chronic ventricular arrhythmias, arrhythmia frequency was suppressed greater than 80% in 3 patients and 50% in 1 patient.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Electrophysiology and antiarrhythmic efficacy of intravenous pirmenol in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

We assessed the electrophysiologic effects and antiarrhythmic efficacy of intravenous pirmenol in 15 patients who had spontaneous and induced sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. At a plasma concentration of 2.29 +/- 0.75 micrograms/ml, pirmenol decreased sinus cycle length by 11 +/- 13%, increased QRS, QTc, and HV intervals by 14 +/- 12%, 13 +/- 12%, and 22 +/- 28%, respectively, and increased atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods (ERP) by 20 +/- 14% and 7 +/- 8%, respectively. There was a greater increase in QRS duration during ventricular tachycardia and ventricular pacing than during sinus rhythm (p less than 0.005). By electropharmacologic testing, pirmenol was judged effective in six patients (40%) and was proarrhythmic in one (6%). In the nine patients in whom pirmenol was judged ineffective, the cycle length of induced VT increased by 36 +/- 15% and the associated mean arterial pressure increased by 21 +/- 14 mm Hg. The only side effects were mild hypotension and mild nausea in one patient each. Intravenous pirmenol has type IA electrophysiologic effects. It can be administered safely to patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and is as effective as approved antiarrhythmic drugs when assessed by electropharmacologic testing.     

Intravenous quinidine: relations among concentration, tachyarrhythmia suppression and electrophysiologic actions with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia

A computer simulation was used to devise quinidine sulfate infusions to produce pseudo-steady-state concentrations in the low (8 microM/liter) and high (14 microM/liter) therapeutic ranges, avoiding high peak concentrations. Using this infusion, efficacy and electrophysiologic actions of quinidine sulfate were assessed in 21 patients with sustained inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) when concentrations were 12.6 +/- 11 microM/liter (mean +/- standard deviation) and 18 +/- 9 microM/liter. Although mean concentrations approximated target levels, there was substantial individual variation. A reciprocal linear relation (r = 0.8, p less than 0.01) was noted between resultant serum concentrations and drug-free ejection fraction (EF). Transient hypotension occurred early in 3 patients, 2 of whom had a normal left ventricular (LV) EF. No hemodynamic compromise was seen in patients with LVEFs of less than 30%. Induced VT was suppressed in 5 patients at low concentrations and in an additional 4 at high concentrations (total 9 of 21, 42%). Concentration-dependent changes in the ventricular effective refractory period of the beat induced by S3 paralleled antiarrhythmic efficacy. Independent of response or lack of response to intravenous quinidine, 17 patients received gradually increasing oral quinidine dosages adjusted to reproduce plasma levels that had been effective during intravenous administration, or to maximal well-tolerated dosage (if side effects occurred). VT was still inducible during oral treatment in 4 of 5 patients in whom VT had been suppressed during the intravenous infusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Use of electrophysiologic testing in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: prognostic and therapeutic implications

Forty patients with coronary artery disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring underwent programmed electrical stimulation. In 22 patients, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced at baseline drug-free electrophysiologic testing; 9 of these patients subsequently developed a clinical sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. In 18 patients, no tachycardia could be induced, and none of these 18 had subsequent tachycardia. In 25 of the 40 patients, arrhythmia management was guided by the results of electrophysiologic testing; this group included 11 patients who received antiarrhythmic therapy for induced ventricular tachycardia and 14 patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy. In the remaining 15 patients, arrhythmia management was not based on the results of electrophysiologic testing. Only two episodes of clinical sustained tachyarrhythmia occurred in the group receiving electrophysiologically guided therapy compared with seven episodes in the group treated without electrophysiologic guidance (p less than 0.01). Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory electrocardiography, electrophysiologic testing can identify those at high and low risk for subsequent clinical tachycardia events. Furthermore, results of such testing can be used to optimize arrhythmia management in these patients.     

Electrophysiologic effects of bepridil in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia assessed by programmed electrical stimulation

The effect of intravenous bepridil, a new calcium antagonist with class I and III properties, was tested in 21 patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias refractory to a mean of five antiarrhythmic agents as assessed by programmed right ventricular stimulation. At control electrophysiologic study without antiarrhythmic agents, sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) was initiated in 20 patients and ventricular fibrillation (VF) was initiated in one patient. After 3 mg/kg of bepridil was administered, VT was still inducible in 19 patients (3 patients had self-terminating VT); the other 2 patients had no inducible VT after bepridil. Bepridil prolonged significantly the QTc interval, the effective refractory period, and the cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia. Two patients with no inducible VT after intravenous bepridil were placed on oral bepridil (300 mg/day). One patient died suddenly and one patient died of progressive heart failure. The results seem to indicate that the efficacy of bepridil in patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia is limited.     

Flecainide single oral dose for management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia in children and young adults.

The efficacy of a single oral dose of flecainide to terminate paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) was evaluated in 25 children and young adults. The subjects were selected from a group of 35 patients with recurrent attacks of PSVT evaluated by means of electrophysiologic study and intravenous electropharmacologic testing with flecainide. In all 25 patients the induced PSVT was stopped by intravenous flecainide and was then no longer inducible or nonsustained. All patients had normal hearts. At least 48 hours after acute intravenous testing, 25 patients underwent electrophysiologic study with a transesophageal catheter and PSVT was induced in all of them: atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in 16 and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in nine. During stable tachycardia, a single oral dose of flecainide (2.9 +/- 0.3 mg/kg; 2.5 to 3.3 mg/kg) was administered. This approach was effective for termination of PSVT in 22 patients. The mean plasma level of flecainide at cessation of tachycardia was 277 +/- 92 ng/ml (150 to 500 mg/ml). All 22 patients who responded were given a single oral dose of flecainide for recurrences of PSVT during follow-up. During a period of 12 +/- 7 months (2 to 27 months) a total of 134 spontaneous episodes of PSVT were reported, and 127 of these episodes were terminated with periodic management. Thus oral periodic flecainide seems useful for management of PSVT in selected patients.