Subtle overlapping deletions in the terminal region of chromosome 6q24.2-q26: Three cases studied using FISH

Interstitial deletions in the terminal region of chromosome 6 are rare. We describe three new cases with subtle interstitial deletions in the q24-q26 region of the long arm of chromosome 6. The karyotypes were analyzed at a 550 band level. Patient1 is a 9-month-old boy with an interstitial deletion, del(6)(q24.2q25.1), developmental delay, low birth weight, hypotonia, heart murmur, respiratory distress, craniofacial and genital anomalies. This is the first report of a case with deletion del(6)(q24.2q25.1). Patient 2 is a 17-year-old young man with an interstitial deletion del(6)(q25.1q25.3), developmental delay, short stature, mental retardation, autism, head, face, chest, hand and feet anomalies and a history of seizures. For the first time autism was described as a manifestation in 6q deletions. Patient 3 is baby boy with a de novo interstitial deletion, del(6)(q25.1q26), anomalies of the brain, genital organs, limbs and feet. This is the first report of a case with deletion, del(6)(q25.1q26). In all three patients, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using chromosome 6 painting probe ruled out an insertion. The ESR (6q25.1) and TBP (6q27) probes were used to confirm the breakpoints. Since TBP signal is present in all cases, it confirmed an interstitial deletion proximal to this probe. Patient 1 has a deletion of the ESR locus; Patient 2 and 3 have signals for the ESR locus on both chromosomes 6. Therefore the deletion in Patients 2 and 3 are between ESR and TBP loci distal to that of Patient 1. FISH validated the deletion breakpoints assessed by conventional cytogenetics. Am. J. Med. Genet. 87:17–22, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Monosomy 6q: report on four new cases

We report on four patients with partial monosomy of the long arm of chromosome 6: two children presenting with an interstitial deletion del(6)(q14q16), the two others presenting with a terminal deletion del(6)(q25qter). These patients are compared with previous reports in the literature: 16 cases of terminal deletion and 17 cases of interstitial deletion. The deletions most often occur de novo. Mental retardation is always described. Dysmorphic facial features range between minor and major. There may be associated visceral abnormalities. After comparing the size and the localisation of the deletions with clinical data, we are now able to suggest a clinical localisation on chromosome 6.     

A phenotype map for 14q32.3 terminal deletions

Detailed molecular-cytogenetic studies combined with thorough clinical characterization are needed to establish genotype-phenotype correlations for specific chromosome deletion syndromes. Although many patients with subtelomeric deletions have been reported, the phenotype maps for many of the corresponding syndromes, including the terminal deletion 14q syndrome, are only slowly emerging. Here, we report on five patients with terminal partial monosomy of 14q32.3 and characteristic features of terminal deletion 14q syndrome. Four of the patients carry de novo terminal deletions of 14q, three of which have not yet been reported. One patient carries an unbalanced translocation der(14)t(9;14)(q34.3;q32.3). Minimum deletion sizes as determined by molecular karyotyping and FISH are 5.82, 5.56, 4.17, 3.54, and 3.29?Mb, respectively. Based on our findings and a comprehensive review of the literature, we refine the phenotype map for typical clinical findings of the terminal deletion 14q syndrome (i.e., intellectual disability/developmental delay, muscular hypotonia, postnatal growth retardation, microcephaly, congenital heart defects, genitourinary malformations, ocular coloboma, and several dysmorphic signs). Combining this phenotype map with benign copy-number variation data available from the Database of Genomic Variants, we propose a small region critical for certain features of the terminal deletion 14q syndrome which contains only seven RefSeq genes.     

Search for imprinted regions on chromosome 14: comparison of maternal and paternal UPD cases with cases of chromosome 14 deletion

Over the past few years, regions of genomic imprinting have been identified on a small number of chromosomes through a search for the etiology of various disorders. Distinct phenotypes have been associated with both maternal and paternal uniparental disomy (UPD) for chromosome 14. This observation indicates that there are imprinted genes present on chromosome 14, although none have been identified to date. In order to focus the search for imprinted genes on chromosome 14, we analyzed cases of maternal and paternal UPD 14 and compared them with cases of chromosome 14 deletions. Cases of paternal UPD were compared with maternal deletions and maternal UPD compared with paternal deletions. The paternal UPD anomalies seen in maternal deletion cases allowed us to associate the following features and chromosomal regions: Hirsute forehead: del(14)(q12q13. 3) and del(14)(q32); blepharophimosis: del(14)(q32); small thorax: del(14)(q11.2q13); and joint contractures: del(14)(q11.2q13) and del(14)(q31). Comparison of maternal UPD and paternal deletion cases revealed fleshy nasal tip to be most often associated with del(14)(q32), scoliosis with del(14) (q23q24.2), and del(14)(q32. 11qter) and small size at birth to be associated with del(14)(q11q13) and del(14)(q32). Our study, in conjunction with a prior study of UPD 14 and partial trisomy 14 cases, and what is known of imprinting in regions of mouse chromosomes homologous to human chromosome 14, leads us to conclude that 14q23-q32 is likely an area where imprinted genes may reside.     

Application of ROMA (representational oligonucleotide microarray analysis) to patients with cytogenetic rearrangements.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the accuracy and sensitivity of Representational Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis (ROMA) to describe copy number changes in patients with chromosomal abnormalities. METHODS: ROMA was performed using BglII digested DNA from two cases with cytogenetically detected deletions and one case with an unbalanced terminal rearrangement detected only by subtelomeric FISH. Hybridization was to an 85,000-probe oligonucleotide microarray, providing an average resolution of 35 kb. FISH was used to confirm some of the ROMA findings. RESULTS: By ROMA, a del(13)(q14.3q21.2) was shown to be noncontiguous, with deletions extending from 53.08 to 61.40 Mb and from 72.88 to 74.83 Mb. The 10-Mb deletion contained only six known genes. FISH confirmed the noncontiguous nature of the deletion, as well as a small amplification in 6q that was also found in the patient's mother. A del(4)(q12q21.2) was found by ROMA to be 23 Mb in length, from 58.8 to 81.9 Mb on chromosome 4, in agreement with the cytogenetically assigned breakpoints. ROMA showed that an unbalanced "subtelomeric" rearrangement involved a 6-Mb deletion of 22q and an 8-Mb duplication of 16q. CONCLUSIONS: ROMA can define cytogenetic aberrations with extraordinary precision. Unexpected findings included the interrupted nature of the deletion in 13q and the large size of the imbalances in the "subtelomeric" rearrangement. Together with the information from the human genome sequence and proteomics, the ability to define rearrangements with "ultra-high" resolution will improve the ability to provide accurate prognosis both prenatally and postnatally to parents of offspring with chromosomal aberrations.     

Higher frequency of uncommon 1.5-2 Mb deletions found in familial cases of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

Familial 22q11.2 deletions have been reported as a 6%-28% of the total affected cases of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (del22q11.2). Different deletion genotypes have been described for this disorder, with a predominant 3 Mb deletion present in 90% of the cases, a less common 1.5-2 Mb deletion in 8%, and atypical smaller deletions in 2%. We have studied 15 cases of del22q11.2 from 6 families (two of them three-generation families) that were previously diagnosed through FISH. We have sized the deleted region by allele genotyping of 12-16 polymorphic markers in all cases, and we have found three families affected with the 1.5-2 Mb deletion, two affected with the 3 Mb deletion, and one in which the deletion size could not be determined. This predominance of the smaller 1.5-2 Mb deletions in our familial cases differs from the minor frequency observed in sporadic cases of del22q11.2. This finding suggests that small deletions are more linked to familial inheritance than large ones, possibly due to psychosocial or biological factors associated with differences in the phenotype. Deletion sizing on routine diagnosis may help characterizing the inheritability of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome.     

Usefulness of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for detecting and characterizing constitutional chromosome abnormalities

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a technique for detection of chromosomal imbalances in a genomic DNA sample. We here report the application of the recently developed method of high-resolution CGH on DNA samples from 66 children having various degrees of delayed psychomotor development with or without clear dysmorphic features and congenital malformations. In 5 of 50 patients with apparently normal karyotypes, a deletion or duplication was revealed by CGH. Only one of these cases had a subtelomeric rearrangement. In one of seven cases with a de novo apparently balanced translocation, deletions were found. In all nine cases where the origin of a marker chromosome or additional chromosomal material was difficult to determine, CGH gave a precise identification. The following findings were from cases having a deletion or duplication as the sole chromosomal imbalance; dup(2)(p16p21), del(4)(q21q21), del(6)(q14q15), del(6)(p12p12), dup(6)(q24qter), and dup(15)(q11q13). One case had dup(9)(p11pter) combined with a very small subtelomeric deletion on 6q. In our hands, CGH is highly useful not only for identifying known chromosomal imbalances, but also for finding elusive deletions or duplications in the large group of children with developmental delay with or without congenital abnormalities. In such cases, the diagnostic yield of CGH appears to be higher than what has been reported from subtelomeric FISH screening.     

Submicroscopic terminal deletion of 1p36.3 and Xp23 hidden in complex chromosome rearrangements: independent mechanism of telomere restitution on the two chromatids

In this study, we report two cases each with a complex chromosome rearrangement concealing a submicroscopic terminal deletion. The first case had a mos 46,XX,der(1)t(1;9)(p36.3;p13). ish der(1)(wcp9 +, 1ptel-, 9ptel +, pan tel +)[88]/46,XX. ish del(1)(1ptel -, 9ptel -, pan tel +)[12] karyotype. Scrutiny by FISH using wcp 9, 1ptel, 9ptel, and pan telomeric probes found a subtelomeric 1ptel deletion on the der(1) in the abnormal cell line and on a chromosome 1 in the apparently normal cell line. The telomere (TTAGGG)n, however, was present on the terminal ends of both copies of chromosome 1 in the apparently normal and abnormal cell lines. The second case had a de novo mos 46,X,der(X)t(X;22)(p22.3;q11.2),inv dup(22)(q11.2).ish der(X)(wcpX +,wcp22 +,KAL +, STS -,Xptel -,BCR +),inv dup(22)(wcp22 +,TUPLE ++,BCR -)[85]/45,X,der(X)t(X;22)(p22.3;q11.2),- 22[15].ish der(X)(wcpX +,wcp22 +, KAL +,STS -,Xptel -,BCR +) karyotype. FISH probes identified a terminal Xpter deletion, distal to the KAL gene. The two rearrangements are hypothesized to have been initiated by a terminal deletion. We propose a model for the formation of the rearrangement in Case 1, which invokes independent telomere stabilization of the sister chromatids. A terminal deletion 1pter in meiosis, was followed by acquiring or regenerating a telomere (TTAGGG)n cap on one chromatid and the other chromatid was involved in a translocation with a chromosome 9 chromatid. Following segregation of this chromosome the viable cell line survives to form the mosaic karyotype. Our findings suggest that subtelomeric deletions should be ruled out in cases with complex and simple rearrangements involving the terminal regions.     

Chromosome 6q deletions: a report of two additional cases and a review of the literature

Here we report on two additional cases of distal 6q deletions with one case showing a terminal deletion of chromosome 6 (46,XY, del(6)(pter----q26:)) and one case showing an interstitial deletion of chromosome 6 (46,XY, del(6)(pter----q23::q25----qter)). The association of retinal abnormalities in 6q deletions is supported, and the additional manifestations of skin hyperextensibility, sacral abnormality, and imperforate anus are described.     

FISH and cytogenetic characterization of a terminal chromosome 1q deletion: clinical case report and phenotypic implications

We report a 24-year-old woman with minor facial anomalies, mental retardation, seizures, and partial agenesis of the corpus callosum. Cytogenetic analysis showed a de novo terminal chromosome 1 long arm deletion. FISH with a panel of chromosome 1q42-qter bands-specific BAC and YAC clones located the breakpoint at the 1q42-q43 junction, with monosomy restricted to the 1q43 and 1q44 bands. The changing craniofacial phenotype of this patient with age is described as part of the del(1)(q) syndrome natural history. The patient's features are compared with those of other patients with similar deletions, and variable phenotypic findings due to different deleted chromosomal segments are discussed.     

Deletion (14) (q24.3q32.1): evidence for a distinct clinical phenotype.

We report on a 4-year-old girl with distinctive facial features (redundant skin, bushy eyebrows, narrow palpebral fissures, short, upturned nose, epicanthal folds, and a long upper lip with well-defined philtrum) who has an interstitial deletion of chromosome 14 including band 14q31, designated as 46,XX,del(14)(pter-->q24.3::q32.1-->qter). Comparison with previously reported patients with deletions of 14q involving band 14q31 suggests that there is a distinctive clinical phenotype associated with this deletion. Our patient had dental abnormalities (3 maxillary and 3 mandibular incisors) not described in the other patients.     

A case of a female infant with simultaneous occurrence of de novo terminal deletions on chromosome 14q and 20p

This is a case report on an infant with de novo terminal deletions on the long arm of chromosome 14 and on the short arm of chromosome 20 [46, XX, del(14)(q32)del(20)(p11)]. Examination revealed that the infant had a peculiar face, a cleft and high palate, abnormal dentition, butterfly-like vertebral defects, finger anomalies, a simian line on the left hand, talipes equinovarus, deep plantar furrows, abnormally high values of alkali phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase, mild anemia and psychomotor retardation. Comparing the present case with previously reported cases of a single deletion on chromosome 14q or chromosome 20p, the infant showed some symptomatic and dysmorphic features of both deletions.     

Dual-probe fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for detecting deletions associated with VCFS/DiGeorge syndrome I and DiGeorge syndrome II loci

Over 90% of patients with DiGeorge syndrome (DGS) or velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) have a microdeletion at 22q11.2. Given that these deletions are difficult to visualize at the light microscopic level, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been instrumental in the diagnosis of this disorder. Deletions on the short arm of chromosome 10 are also associated with a DGS-like phenotype. Since deletions at 22q11.2 and at 10p13p14 result in similar findings, we have developed a dual-probe FISH assay for screening samples referred for DGS or VCFS in the clinical laboratory. This assay includes two test probes for the loci, DGSI at 22q11.2 and DGSII at 10p13p14, and centromeric probes for chromosomes 10 and 22. Of 412 patients tested, 54 were found to be deleted for the DGSI locus on chromosome 22 (13%), and a single patient was found deleted for the DGSII locus on chromosome 10 (0. 24%). The patient with the 10p deletion had facial features consistent with VCFS, plus sensorineural hearing loss, and renal anomalies. Cytogenetic analysis showed a large deletion of 10p [46, XX,del(10)(p12.2p14)] and FISH using a 10p telomere region-specific probe confirmed the interstitial nature of the deletion. Analysis for the DGSI and the DGSII loci suggests that the deletion of the DGSII locus on chromosome 10 may be 50 times less frequent than the deletion of DGSI on chromosome 22. The incidence of deletions at 22q11.2 has been estimated to be 1 in 4000 newborns; therefore, the deletion at 10p13p14 may be estimated to occur in 1 in 200,000 live births.     

Unexpected identification of two interstitial deletions in a patient with a pericentric inversion of a chromosome 4 and an abnormal phenotype

Interstitial deletions and pericentric inversions of chromosome 4 appear to be unusual phenomena. Here, we report the case of a 14-year-old boy with severe psychomotor retardation with a de novo 46,XY,der(4)del(p15.2p15.31)inv(4)(p15.2q13.3)del(4)(q13.2q13.2) karyotype. We used FISH analysis with YAC and BAC clones to characterise the inversion's breakpoints. A complex event with six breakpoints was found, characterised by a pericentric inversion and two deletions, the first on the short arm of chromosome 4 (4p) and the second on the long arm of chromosome 4 (4q). The deletion events had removed two segments, one of approximately 5 Mb, from 4p, outside the inversion, and the other 2 Mb from 4q, inside the inversion. These rearrangements were not found in the parents. Microsatellite marker analysis showed that the inversion carrying chromosome 4 was derived from the father. Bioinformatic analysis of the human genome sequence allowed us to identify several hemizygotic genes in the patient, which might be involved in the pathogenesis of this clinical phenotype.     

Ring chromosome 9 [r(9)(p24q34)]: a report of two cases

We report clinical and molecular cytogenetic studies in two patients with ring chromosome 9. Cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using the p16 gene probe on 9p21, the ABL gene on 9q34, chromosome 9 alpha satellite-centromeric probes, and TelVision 9p and 9q probes which identify subtelomere-specific sequences on chromosome 9p and 9q, revealed 46,XX,r(9)(p24q34).ish r(9)(305J7-T7-,p16+,ABL+, D9S325-) and 46XY,r(9)(p24q34).ish r(9)(305J7-T7-,p16+,ABL+, D9S325-). Based on FISH analysis at least 115 kb was deleted on terminal 9p, and at least 95 kb from terminal 9q. In comparison with other reports of r(9), deletion 9p, and deletion 9q, both patients had clinical characteristics of ring 9 and additional features of deletion 9q or deletion 9p syndrome. The variability between the two cases with r(9) despite similar breakpoints identified by GTG-banding and FISH may be explained by submicroscopic differences between deletion breakpoints, ring instability, interaction of other genes on the phenotype, and variation in fetal environmental conditions.     

Interstitial and terminal deletions of the long arm of chromosome 4: further delineation of phenotypes

We reviewed 45 patients with a deletion of the long arm of chromosome 4. Forty-one were previous reports (25 terminal deletions and 16 interstitial deletions) and 4 are new cases with terminal deletions. Of the 29 patients with terminal deletions, 18 with deletion at 4q31 and 4 at 4q32----qter had an identifiable phenotype consisting of abnormal skull shape, hypertelorism, cleft palate, apparently low-set abnormal pinnae, short nose with abnormal bridge, virtually pathognomonic pointed fifth finger and nail, congenital heart and genitourinary defects, moderate-severe mental retardation, poor postnatal growth, and hypotonia. Six patients with a deletion at 4q33 and one patient with deletion 4q34 were less severely affected. In general, patients with various interstitial deletions proximal to 4q31 had a phenotype that was less specific, although mental retardation and minor craniofacial anomalies were also present. There were 3 patients with piebaldism and one with Rieger syndrome. We conclude that terminal deletion of chromosome 4q (4q31----qter) appears to produce a distinctive malformation (MCA/MR) syndrome in which the phenotype correlates with the amount of chromosome material missing and which differs from the more variable phenotype associated with interstitial deletions of 4q.     

Chromosome rearrangements in cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS): report of a der(3)t(3;12)(p25.3;p13.3) in two half sibs with features of CdLS and review of reported CdLS cases with chromosome rearrangements

Cornelia de Lange syndrome (CdLS; OMIM 122470) is a dominantly inherited disorder characterized by multisystem involvement, cognitive delay, limb defects, and characteristic facial features. Recently, mutations in NIPBL have been found in approximately 50% of individuals with CdLS. Numerous chromosomal rearrangements have been reported in individuals with CdLS. These rearrangements may be causative of a CdLS phenotype, result in a phenocopy, or be unrelated to the observed phenotype. We describe two half siblings with a der(3)t(3;12)(p25.3;p13.3) chromosomal rearrangement, clinical features resembling CdLS, and phenotypic overlap with the del(3)(p25) phenotype. Region-specific BAC probes were used to fine-map the breakpoint region by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). FISH analysis places the chromosome 3 breakpoint distal to RP11-115G3 on 3p25.3; the chromosome 12 breakpoint is distal to BAC RP11-88D16 on 12p13.3. A review of published cases of terminal 3p deletions and terminal 12p duplications indicates that the findings in these siblings are consistent with the del(3)(p25) phenotype. Given the phenotypic overlap with CdLS, we have reviewed the reported cases of chromosomal rearrangements involved in CdLS to better elucidate other potential loci that could harbor additional CdLS genes. Additionally, to identify chromosome rearrangements, genome-wide array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) was performed on eight individuals with typical CdLS and without identifiable deletion or mutation of NIPBL. No pathologic rearrangements were identified.     

FISH analysis for apparently simple terminal deletions of the X chromosome: Identification of hidden structural abnormalities

We report on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in 30 mosaic or nonmosaic females diagnosed as having apparently simple terminal X deletions by standard G‐banding analysis. FISH studies for DXZ1, the Xp and Xq telomere regions, and the whole X chromosome painting were carried out for the 30 females, indicating rearranged X chromosomes with signal patterns discordant with terminal deletions in 6 cases: one dic(X)(DXZ1++) chromosome, two der(X)(qtel++) chromosomes, one Xq? (qtel+) chromosome, and two der(X)(ptel++) chromosomes. Additional FISH studies were performed for the 6 cases using probes defining 12 loci on the X chromosome, showing large Xp deletion and small Xp duplication in the dic(X)(DXZ1++) chromosome, partial Xp deletions and partial Xq duplications in the two der(X)(qtel++) chromosomes, an interstitial Xq deletion in the Xq? (qtel+) chromosome, and partial Xq deletions and partial Xp duplications in the two der(X)(ptel++) chromosomes. Clinical assessment of the 6 cases revealed tall and normal stature in the two mosaic cases with the der(X)(ptel++) chromosomes that were shown to be associated with SHOX duplication. The results suggest that unusual X chromosome rearrangements are often misinterpreted as simple terminal X deletions, and that FISH analysis is useful for precise structural determination and better genotype‐phenotype correlation of the X chromosome aberrations. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Cryptic terminal rearrangement of chromosome 22q13.32 detected by FISH in two unrelated patients.

Two unrelated patients with cryptic subtelomeric deletions of 22q13.3 were identified using FISH with the commercially available Oncor probe, D22S39. Proband 1 was found to have a derivative chromosome 22 resulting from the unbalanced segregation of a t(1;22)(q44;q13.32) in her mother. Additional FISH analysis of proband 1 and her mother placed the breakpoint on chromosome 22 in this family proximal to D22S55 and D22S39 and distal to D22S45. We have mapped D22S39 to within 170 kb of D22S21 using pulsed field gel electrophoresis. D22S21 is genetically mapped between D22S55 and D22S45. These data indicate that the deletion in proband 1 is smaller than in eight of nine reported del(22)(q13.3) patients. Probands 1 and 2 share features of hypotonia, developmental delay, and expressive language delay, also seen in previously reported del(22)(q13.3) patients, although proband 1 appears to be more mildly affected. Proband 1 is also trisomic for the region 1q44-->qter. This very small duplication has been previously reported only once and the patient had idiopathic mental retardation. This is the first report where 22q13.3 terminal deletion patients have been identified through the use of FISH, and the first report of a deletion of this region occurring because of missegregation of a parental balanced cryptic translocation. We feel that investigation of the frequency of del(22)(q13.3) in the idiopathic mentally retarded population is warranted and may be aided by the ability to use a commercially available probe (D22S39), which is already currently in use in a large number of cytogenetic laboratories.