Comparative bioavailability of two immediate-release tablets of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide in healthy volunteers

AIM: Two formulations of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide (20 mg/12.5 mg) were evaluated for bioequivalence after single dosing in healthy volunteers. METHODS: The study was conducted according to an open, randomized, 2-period crossover design with a 2-week washout interval between doses. Twenty-four volunteers participated and all completed the study successfully. Lisinopril and hydrochlorothiazide were determined in plasma by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after logarithmic transformation of data and ratios of tmax were evaluated non-parametrically. RESULTS: For lisinopril, the parametric analysis revealed the following test/reference ratios and their confidence intervals (90% CI): 1.01 (0.84-1.22) for AUC(0-t), 0.98 (0.81-1.19) for AUC(0-infinity), 1.02 (0.83-1.25) for Cmax and 1.03 (0.99-1.08) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CI for tmax was 0.94-1.07. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations. As for hydrochlorothiazide, test/reference ratios and their confidence intervals (90% CI) were: 1.05 (0.95-1.17), 1.02 (0.93-1.12) for AUC(0-infinity), 0.99 (0.89-1.07) for Cmax and 0.97 (0.90-1.04) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The 90% CI for tmax was 1.00-1.41. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations except for tmax. A discrete fall in both systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure was observed after drug administration. The time course of both parameters was similar for the 2 formulations. Heart rates also followed a similar time profile. CONCLUSIONS: The bioequivalence of the 2 formulations of lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide was demonstrated.     

Comparative bioavailability study of doxycycline hyclate (equivalent to 100 mg doxycycline) capsules (doxycin vs vibramycin) for bioequivalence evaluation in healthy adult volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new capsule formulation of doxycycline (100 mg), doxycin, relative to the reference product, vibramycin (100 mg) capsules. The bioavailability was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose (100 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a 2-week washout period. A randomized, balanced 2-way cross-over design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of doxycycline were analyzed by a sensitive and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for doxycycline were determined using standard noncompartmental methods. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, K(el), t(1/2) and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80-125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis of the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 95.98-109.56%, 92.21 to 107.66%, 93.90-112.56%, and 96.0 to 106.91% respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) by the Schuirmann's two 1-sided t-tests. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence of two oral ciprofloxacin tablets formulations

The relative bioavailability of a new 750 mg tablet formulation of ciprofloxacin (test formulation supplied by Dr. August Wolff GmbH and Co., Germany) was compared with that of Ciprobay tablets 750 mg (reference formulation from Bayer Vital GmbH and Co., Germany). Twenty-four healthy volunteers (12 male and 12 female) were included in this single-dose, 2-sequence, crossover randomized study. Blood samples were obtained prior to dosing and at 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 18, 24 and 30 hours after drug administration. Plasma concentrations of ciprofloxacin were determined by HPLC. No differences were found when the in vitro dissolution profiles of both formulations were compared. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of data, and ratios of tmax were evaluated nonparametrically. The parametric analysis revealed the following mean values for the test/reference ratios (90% standard confidence intervals in parenthesis (ln-transformed data): 1.01 (0.95-1.07) for AUC(0-t), 0.99 (0.93-1.05) for AUC(0-infinity), 1.05 (0.97-1.14) for Cmax and 1.06 (0.97-1.15) for Cmax/AUC(0-infinity). The nonparametric confidence interval for tmax was 0.77-1.15. All parameters showed bioequivalence between both formulations as their confidence intervals were within the bioequivalence acceptable range of 0.80-1.25 limits; the 90% confidence interval for tmax slightly exceeded limits of bioequivalence. We conclude that both formulations show bioequivalence for both the rate and the extent of absorption.     

Comparative bioavailability study of cefixime (equivalent to 100 mg/5 ml) suspension (Winex vs Suprax) in healthy male volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new suspension formulation of cefixime (100 mg/5 ml), Winex, relative to the reference product, Suprax (100 mg/5 ml) suspension. The bio-availability study was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single oral dose (200 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products on 2 treatment days after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. A randomized, balanced two-way crossover design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected over a period of 16 hours. Plasma concentrations of cefixime were analyzed using a sensitive high-performance liquid chromatographic assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for cefixime were determined using standard non-compartmental method. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, Kel, t1/2 and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using raw and log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pnfinity harmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80 - 125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 88.93 - 107.10%, 89.09 - 107.11%, 89.63 - 108.58% and 96.85 - 105.29%, respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), and Cmax using the Schuirmann's two one-sided t-tests. Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations containing diacerein 50 mg in healthy human subjects

This study presents the results of a two-way, two-period, two-treatment crossover investigation in 12 healthy Indian male subjects to assess the bioequivalence of two oral formulations containing 50 mg of diacerein (CAS 13739-02-1). Both formulations were administered orally as a single dose separated by a one-week washout period. The content of diacerein in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this study indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.63% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations containing rimonabant 20 mg in healthy Indian subjects

A randomized, two-treatment and two-way crossover study on twelve healthy Indian male subjects was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations containing 20 mg of rimonabant (CAS 158681-13-1). Both of the formulations were administered orally as a single dose with a 45-day washout period between two dosing sessions. The content of rimonabant in plasma was determined by a validated HPLC method with UV detection. The formulations were compared using the parameters area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-t)), area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)), peak plasma concentration (Cmax), and time to reach peak plasma concentration (tmax). The results of this investigation indicated that there were no statistically significant differences between the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax values of the two preparations. The 90% confidence interval for the ratio of the logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were within the bioequivalence limit of 0.8-1.25 and the relative bioavailability of the test formulation was 96.62% of that of the reference formulation. Thus, these findings clearly indicate that the two formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of drug absorption.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence evaluation of 2 levosulpiride preparations after a single oral dose in healthy male Korean volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the bioequivalence of a single oral 25 mg dose of 2 levosulpiride preparations in healthy male Korean volunteers. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted as a randomized, 2-period crossover design in 28 healthy male Korean volunteers who received a single oral dose of 25 mg levosulpiride tablet in each study period. There was a 6-day washout period between the doses. Serum concentrations of levosulpiride up to 36 hours after the administration were determined using a validated HPLC method with fluorescence detection. In addition, in vitro dissolution profiles of both preparations were examined. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as AUC(0-t) (the area under the curve from zero to the time), AUC(0-infinity) (the area under the curve from zero to infinity), Cmax (maximum serum concentration), tmax (time to reach Cmax) and t1/2 (terminal half-life) were analyzed by non-compartmental analysis, and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using logarithmically transformed AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax, and untransformed Tmax. RESULTS: In vitro dissolution profiles were similar by calculating similarity factor (f2 = 67.73). There were no significant differences between the 2 preparations in AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax. The point estimates (90% confidence intervals) for AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were 1.085 (1.003-1.173), 1.069 (0.991-1.153) and 1.075 (0.954 to 1.210), respectively, satisfying the bioequivalence criteria of 0.80-1.25 as proposed by the US FDA and the Korean legislation. No statistically significant difference was found for tmax and t1/2 values. CONCLUSION: From the results of the present study, it is indicated that the 2 preparations of levosulpiride are bioequivalent and it can be assumed that they are therapeutically equivalent and exchangeable in clinical practice.     

Bioequivalence study of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets in healthy subjects: moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) versus standard tablet (lactose formulation)

OBJECTIVE: A study was conducted to assess the bioequivalence of two limaprost alfadex 5 microg tablets, a moisture-resistant tablet (dextran formulation) and a standard tablet (lactose formulation). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The clinical investigation was designed as a randomized, open-labeled, two-part, two-treatment, two-period crossover study, in 120 healthy male volunteers. One tablet of either formulation was administered with 200 ml of water after 10-hour overnight fast. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 6 hours. Plasma harvested from blood was analyzed for limaprost by a validated LC/MS/MS method. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values and time associated with the maximal concentration (tmax) were obtained from the observed data. The elimination rate constant (lambda z) was obtained as the slope of the linear regression of the log-transformed concentration values vs. time data in the terminal phase, and the elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated as 0.693/lambda z. The area under the curve to the last measurable point (AUC0-t) was estimated by the linear trapezoidal rule. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out using log-transformed AUC0-t, AUC0-A yen and Cmax and untransformed tmax, and 90% confidence intervals for AUC0-t and Cmax were calculated. If the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for both AUC0-t and Cmax fell fully within the interval 80 - 125%, the bioequivalence of the two formulations was established. RESULTS: The means of AUC0-t were 0.779 vs. 0.754 pg x h/ml (test vs. reference), and the means of the Cmax were 1.26 vs. 1.12 pg/ml (test vs. reference). The geometric mean ratios of the test formulation to reference formulation for AUC0-t and Cmax were 104.0 and 112.4%, respectively, and the 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax were 100.7 - 107.4% and 105.6 - 119.6%, respectively. Both 90% CI for AUC0-t and Cmax fell within the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan accepted bioequivalence range of 80 - 125%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results, the moisture-resistant tablet was determined to be bioequivalent to the standard tablet.     

Bioequivalence study of two brands of enalapril tablets after single oral administration to healthy volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative bioavailability and bioequivalence of 2 enalapril tablet formulations in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions. METHODS: An open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-period, crossover trial with a 1-week washout period in 24 healthy volunteers. The 2 enalapril 20 mg tablet formulations used were Antiprex (Elpen, Greece) as test and Renitec (Vianex, Greece) as reference preparation. Serial blood samples were collected at 19 points for 36 h. Plasma samples were analyzed for enalaprilat, the pharmacologically active metabolite of enalapril, by a validated GC/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters, such as AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t), C(max) T(max), t1/2 and MRT were calculated from plasma concentrations for both formulations. Statistical comparisons (ANOVA and 90% confidence intervals) of AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t) and C(max) data were evaluated after logarithmic transformation, and differences of T(max) were tested non-parametrically. RESULTS: The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean values of the test/reference ratios were 88.0 - 117.6% (point estimate: 101.8%) for AUC(0-infinity), 88.7 - 118.9% (point estimate: 102.7%) for AUC(0-t), and 91.0% - 123.4% (point estimate: 106.0%) for C(max) No statistically significant differences were found between the 2 preparations for T(max) t1/2 and MRT values. CONCLUSIONS: From the results of the present study, it is concluded that the test and reference tablet formulations of enalapril are bioequivalent for both the extent and the rate of absorption and therefore the 2 products can be considered to be interchangeable in clinical practice.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of ranitidine film tablets in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of ranitidine (CAS 66357-35-5) from two different ranitidine hydrochloride (CAS 66357-59-3) film tablets (Ranitab 150 mg film tablets as test preparation and 150 mg film tablets of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 9 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 24 h post-dose, and ranitidine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 461.8 ng/ml (test) and 450.6 ng/ ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC (0-infinity) of 2,488.6 ng . h/ml (test) and 2,528.8 ng . h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 2.83 h (test) and 3.04 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 2.78 h (test) and 2.89 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 91.93 %-106.98 % (AUC (0-infinity) and 92.34%-118.85% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90 % confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 %-125 %.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of a generic amlodipine tablet formulation in healthy male volunteers

Two different tablets containing amlodipine besylate (CAS 111470-99-6) (Vazkor 10 mg tablet as test preparation and 10 mg tablet of the originator product as reference preparation) were investigated in 18 healthy male volunteers in order to compare the bioavailability and prove the bioequivalence between both treatments after oral single dose administration. The study was performed according to an open-label, randomized, two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 21 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 144 h post-dose, and amlodipine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 6,183.7 pg/ml (test) and 5,366.7 pg/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 267,231.0 pg x h/ml (test) and 266,061.7 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 5.6 h (test) and 6.1 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t 1/2) were 46.46 h (test) and 45.34 h (reference). Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA); 90% confidence intervals were between 93.20%-107.16% (AUC(0-infinity) and 103.36%-123.13% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Bioequivalence studies of 2 oral cefaclor capsule formulations in chinese healthy subjects

An open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover study was carried out in 20 Chinese healthy male subjects to compare the pharmacokinetics of 2 cefaclor (CAS 53994-73-3) formulations after administration of a single 250 mg dose of each drug with a 1-week wash-out period. Blood samples were collected before and with 6 h after drug administration. Plasma concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with UV detector. 2 formulations were evaluated using the following pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC0-t, Cmax and tmax was analyzed nonparametrically. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the ratios (teat/reference) of log-transformed AUC0-t and Cmax fell within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80-125%. The results showed that the 90% CI of the ratios of AUC0-t and Cmax were 105.1% (101.0-109.4%) and 92.4% (82.5-103.4%), respectively, which therefore could conclude 2 oral cefaclor capsule formulations of cefaclor are bioequivalent. Both treatments showed similar tolerability and safety.     

Comparative bioavailability of alpha-methyldopa normal and film tablet formulations after single oral administration in healthy volunteers.

In a single dose, randomized, cross-over study, with one week of wash-out period, the relative bioavailability of Dopegyt tablets containing 250 mg alpha-methyldopa (AMD) and Presinol film tablets with identical active ingredient content was examined in 24 healthy volunteers. Since technologically two completely different preparations (a film-tablet and a non-film-tablet) having significantly different in vitro dissolution were to be compared, both preparations were compared to a third one, AMD solution (Dopegyt solution) with 250 mg/50 ml concentration. Plasma concentrations of the drug were measured for 24 hours post-dose, applying HPLC with fluorometric detection. Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated from individual data (AUC0-infinity, AUC0-t, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-infinity, t(max)) were evaluated statistically. Wilcoxon's nonparametric test and the four-way variance analysis could not detect any significant difference at the usual a=95% probability level in these pharmacokinetic parameters of the two tablet preparations. For AUC0-infinity at the 90% probability level, the confidence interval was 0.883-1.237 (with an estimated geometric mean of 1.045), for the test/reference ratio of Dopegyt and Presinol tablets, thus the two preparations proved to be bioequivalent. The relative bioavailability of Dopegyt (test preparation) and Presinol (reference preparation) calculated from the AUC0-infinity values was 116.7+/-56.7% that also confirmed bioequivalence. The results of all the applied statistical tests suggest that Dopegyt and Presinol can be considered as bioequivalent preparations.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

In vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship and in vitro equivalence of two oral furosemide tablet formulations

A randomized, cross-over, open study of bioequivalence between two different furosemide (CAS 54-31-9) formulations was performed; simultaneously, diuretic effects (urine output, sodium, potassium and chloride excretion) were also compared. Both products meet the British Pharmacopoeia specification and the results of a previous in vitro comparative study ensure equivalence of the two dissolution curves. Twenty-four healthy volunteers (male/female) participated in the bioequivalence study. Each treatment was given as a single 40-mg tablet following an overnight fast. Furosemide concentrations in plasma (measured by HPLC) and electrolyte amounts in urine were determined up to 12 h after treatment. The pharmacokinetic parameters AUC0-infinity, Cmax and Cmax/AUC0-infinity were tested for bioequivalence after ln-transformation of data and ratios of tmax were evaluated nonparametrically. The parametric analysis revealed the following test/reference ratios and their 90% confidence intervals (90% CI): 1.06 (0.94-1.19) for AUC0-infinity, 1.12 (0.96-1.31) for Cmax, and 1.06 (0.97-1.16) for Cmax/AUC0-infinity. The 90% CI for tmax was 0.55-1.00. Bioequivalence between both formulations was concluded for all parameters except for tmax. No significant diuretic differences between both formulations (test and reference) were observed after drug administration in relation to the baseline period. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate showed a similar time-course after the drug administration and there were no differences between both formulations. Both products were well tolerated. It can be concluded that both formulations are equivalent in vitro and in vivo.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of 800 mg of acyclovir-containing Telviran and Zovirax tablets in healthy volunteers]

The authors performed a detailed comparative clinical and pharmacokinetic study with two 800 mg acyclovir containing tablets, namely the Telviran (EGIS Pharmaceuticals Ltd.) and the Zovirax (Wellcome Foundation Ltd.). The determination of the detailed pharmacokinetic parameters and the relative bioavailability was carried out on 24 healthy male volunteers in a two way, open, randomised, cross-over design study after single dose administration. The plasma concentration of acyclovir was determined by a newly developed and validated highly sensitive (LLOQ = 10 ng/ml) HPLC-UV bioanalytical method after sample preparation with RP-18 solid phase extraction method (SPE). The individual pharmacokinetic parameters calculated from the time-plasma concentration curve (tmax, Cmax, AUC0-infinity, AUC0-16, AUC0-t, AUC0-z, AUCRest, t beta 1/2, MRT, Cmax/AUC0-infinity) were compared with statistical methods (ANOVA, ANOVAlog, Confidence interval, Schuirmann, Wilcoxon tests). On the basis of the results of the statistical evaluation and the clinical study, there was no significant difference found between the two acyclovir containing preparations. The comparative pharmacokinetic study demonstrated, that the relative bioavailability of the 800 mg Telviran and Zovirax tablets are equivalent and the two products are bioequivalent.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of doxycycline capsules in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of doxycycline (CAS 564-25-0) from two different doxycycline hyclate (CAS 24390-14-5) capsules (Monodoks 100 mg capsule as test preparation and 100 mg capsule of the originator product as reference preparation) in 24 healthy male subjects. The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 16 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose, and doxycycline plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 1,715.1 ng/ml (test) and 1,613.3 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 28,586.5 ng x h/ml (test) and 29,047.5 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 1.88 h (test) and 2.00 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 16.49 h (test) and 16.75 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 92.39 %-103.53% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 98.45%-111.74% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 0%-125%.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of doxepin

Two different oral doxepin (CAS 1668-195) formulations (Doxepin-ratiopharm 25 mg film-coated tablets as test preparation and 25 mg dragées of the reference preparation) were investigated in 30 healthy male and female volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 75 mg oral dose (3 units of test or reference preparation) was given according to a randomised two-way cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of doxepin and its metabolite N-desmethyldoxepin were collected at pre-defined time points up to 168 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of three weeks separated both treatment periods. Doxepin and N-desmethyldoxepin plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method. Values of 193,463 pgh/ml (test preparation) and 197,988 pg h/ml (reference preparation) for doxepin as well as values of 313,298 pg h/ml (test preparation) and 306,663 pgh/ml (reference preparation) for N-desmethyldoxepin for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) for doxepin/N-desmethyldoxepin of 15,960.06/6,883.69 pg/ml and 18,614.73/6,846.62 pg/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach doxepin maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 1.98 h for both preparations and for N-desmethyldoxepin tmax was 4.52 h (test preparation) and 4.15 h (reference preparation). Cmax and AUC0-infinity values were tested for statistically significant differences by means of the Two One-Sided T-Tests procedure following ln-transformation of data. Bioequivalence was assumed if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80%-125% for ln-transformed AUC0-infinity and 70%-143% for ln-transformed Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between the test and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Comparative bioequivalence study of two isotretinoin soft gel capsule formulations in healthy male volunteers

OBJECTIVE: To assess the bioequivalence of 2 oral isotretinoin (20 mg) soft gel capsule formulations. The reference preparation was Roaccutan/Roche while the test preparation was A-Cnotren/Pharmaten, Athens, Greece. SUBJECTS, MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was an open, randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence, 2-treatment crossover, involving 38 healthy male volunteer subjects. All volunteers completed the study. Isotretinoin plasma concentrations were measured by a fully validated HPLC method. Special care was taken through the collection and analysis of the samples due to instability of isotretinoin to light and temperature. Pharmacokinetic parameters used to assess bioequivalence were AUC(0-last), AUC(0-infinity) for the extent of absorption and Cmax and Tmax for the rate of absorption. Statistical evaluation of Cmax, AUC(0-last), AUC(0-infinity) was done after semi-logarithmic transformation by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Tmax values were tested using the distribution-free Hodges-Lehman interval. RESULTS: The parametric 90% confidence intervals for ratio T/R ranged from 95.20-103.20% (point estimate 99.10%) for AUC(0-last), 94.57-102.30% (point estimate 98.36%) for AUC(0-infinity) and 94.81-102.90% (point estimate 98.77%) for Cmax, respectively. Based on the results of Tmax, k(el) and t(1/2), too, there were no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION: As a result, the 2 isotretinoin preparations in accordance with the European Union bioequivalence requirements, are equivalent with respect to rate and extent of absorption.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of methylprednisolone

Two different oral methylprednisolone (CAS 83-43-2) formulations (Methylprednisolon-ratiopharm 8 mg tables as test preparation (T) and tablets of a reference preparation (R)) were investigated in 16 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 8 mg oral dose was given according to a randomised two-way crossover design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of methylprednisolone plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 16 h following drug administration. A washout period of 3 days separated both treatment periods. Methylprednisolone plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method. Values of 342.53 ng.h/ml (test preparation) and 336.61 ng.h/ml (reference preparation) for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate an nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) of 66.58 ng/ml and 70.51 ng/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 2.2 h for both preparations. Cmax and AUC0-infinity-values were tested parametrically by the two one-sided t-test procedure. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80-125% for AUC0-infinity and 70-143% for Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between Methylprednisolone ratiopharm and the reference preparation was demonstrated.