腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术疗效分析

Objective To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer. Methods From September 2000 to December 2004, 99 patients with colorectal cancer underwent laparoscopic radical resection (laparoscopic group) and 198 patients with colorectal cancer underwent open radical resection (open group) at the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The differences in local recurrence and survival between the two groups were compared. The local recurrence of tumors and survival of patients in the two groups were calculated by the life-table method, and were compared by the Wilcoxon (Gehan) test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The recurrence interval and survival time of the two groups were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The 2-and 3-year local recurrence rates in the laparoscopic group were both 3.0% and the overall local recurrence rate was 3.0% (3/99). The 2-and 3-year local recurrence rates in the open group were 2.6% and 4.0% , respectively, and the overall local recurrence rate was 3.5% (7/198), with no significant difference between the two groups (χ2 =0.002, P > 0. 05). The median survival time of patients with local recurrence was 15 months (range, 7-24 months) in the laparoscopic group and 11 months (range, 2-28 months) in the open group, with no significant difference between the groups (U = 15. 500, P >0. 05). The 1-year survival rate was 33.3% in the laparoscopic group and 42.9% in the open group. The 2-year survival rate was zero in the laparoscopic group and 42. 9% in the open group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the 1-and 2-year survival rates (χ2 =0.120, P>0.05). Conclusions The efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer is similar to that of open surgery. Laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer is safe and feasible, and does not increase the recurrence rate of cancer.     

腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术疗效分析

Objective To investigate the efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer. Methods From September 2000 to December 2004, 99 patients with colorectal cancer underwent laparoscopic radical resection (laparoscopic group) and 198 patients with colorectal cancer underwent open radical resection (open group) at the Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University. The differences in local recurrence and survival between the two groups were compared. The local recurrence of tumors and survival of patients in the two groups were calculated by the life-table method, and were compared by the Wilcoxon (Gehan) test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. The recurrence interval and survival time of the two groups were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test. Results The 2-and 3-year local recurrence rates in the laparoscopic group were both 3.0% and the overall local recurrence rate was 3.0% (3/99). The 2-and 3-year local recurrence rates in the open group were 2.6% and 4.0% , respectively, and the overall local recurrence rate was 3.5% (7/198), with no significant difference between the two groups (χ2 =0.002, P > 0. 05). The median survival time of patients with local recurrence was 15 months (range, 7-24 months) in the laparoscopic group and 11 months (range, 2-28 months) in the open group, with no significant difference between the groups (U = 15. 500, P >0. 05). The 1-year survival rate was 33.3% in the laparoscopic group and 42.9% in the open group. The 2-year survival rate was zero in the laparoscopic group and 42. 9% in the open group. There were no significant differences between the groups for the 1-and 2-year survival rates (χ2 =0.120, P>0.05). Conclusions The efficacy of laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer is similar to that of open surgery. Laparoscopic radical resection for colorectal cancer is safe and feasible, and does not increase the recurrence rate of cancer.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

浆膜受侵的结直肠癌术后腹腔化疗联合静脉化疗的临床研究

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy to systemic chemotherapy alone for serosa-involved colorectal cancer. Methods According to the criteria of serosa-involving in colorectal cancer, 332 cases were divided into 2 groups prospectively without randomization. Study group (n=166) was treated with intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy, and control group (n=166) with systemic chemotherapy alone. Incidence of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis, hepatic metastasis, other distant metastasis and 3-year, 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of two groups were compared. Results 3-year and 5-year OS rates of stage Ⅱ B in study group were similar to those in control group (χ2=0.612,P=0.434). The above rates of stage Ⅲ in study group were higher than those in control group (χ2=3.989,P=0.046). Either the study group or the control group, the 3-year and 5-year OS rates of patients undergone laparoscopic surgery or open surgery were similar (P=0.839, P=0.172). Incidences of local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis in study group were 1.9%, 3.8% and 3.8% respetively, lower than those in control group (8.2%,9.5% and 10.1%,P<0.05). Distant metastasis rate in study group was similar to that in control group. In study group, intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen with Oxaliplatin had lower rates of peritoneal metastasis and hepatic metastasis as compared to that with Cisplatin (0.9% vs 8.8% ,P=0.019), while the incidences of local recurrence and other distant metastasis were similar. Conclusions Postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy combined with systemic chemotherapy improves 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates in patients with stage Ⅲ serosa-involved colorectal cancer, and decreases local recurrence, peritoneal metastasis and liver metastasis rate, especially when intraperitoneal chemotherapy regimen contains Oxaliphtin. Comparing with open surgery, laparoscopic surgery dose not improve 3-year and S-year overall survival rates in patients receiving combined chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy alone.     

经皮射频消融与再手术治疗单个直径≤3 cm的复发性肝癌的疗效比较

目的 比较经皮射频消融(PRFA)与再手术切除治疗单个直径≤3 cm的复发性肝癌的疗效.方法 回顾性分析1999年1月至2009年12月中山大学肿瘤防治中心收治的151例复发性肝癌(单个肿瘤直径≤3 cm)患者的临床资料,其中79例患者行PRFA(PRFA组),72例行肿瘤再手术切除(再手术切除组).比较两组患者的生存率、并发症发生率及肿瘤复发情况.计量资料比较采用t检验,计数资料比较采用x2检验,生存率计算采用寿命表法,生存曲线采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制,组间比较采用Log-rank检验.结果 PRFA组和再手术切除组并发症发生率分别为13%(10/79)和36%(26/72),两组比较,差异有统计学意义(x2=11.411,P＜0.05).PRFA组和再手术切除组1～5年累积生存率分别为89.7%、75.2%、67.1%、61.5%、56.6%和86.0%、67.6%、53.6%、44.1%、40.2%,两组总体生存曲线比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=1.610,P＞0.05).PRFA组4、5年累积生存率显著高于再手术切除组(x2=4.682,4.196,P＜0.05).PRFA组肿瘤局部复发率为5%(4/79),再手术切除组切缘复发率为3%(2/72),两组比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.565,P＞0.05).结论 PRFA治疗单个直径≤3 cm的复发性肝癌的长期疗效优于再手术切除,且具有微创的优势.

Abstract：

Objective To compare the efficacy of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) and repeat hepatectomy for solitary recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with the diameter≤3 cm. Methods The clinical data of 151 patients with recurrent HCC (diameter≤3 cm) who were admitted to the Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University from January 1999 to December 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Of all the patients, 79received PRFA (PRFA group) and 72 received repeat hepatectomy (repeat hepatectomy group). The survival rate, morbidity and recurrence of the tumor between the two groups were compared. All data were analyzed using t test, chi-square test or Log-rank test, and the survival of the patients were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The mobidities of the PRFA group and repeat hepatectomy group were 13% (10/79) and 36%(26/72), respectively, with a significant difference between the two groups (x2=11.411, P＜0.05). The cumulative 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-year survival rates were 89.7%, 75.2%, 67.1%, 61.5%, 56.6% in the PRFA group, and 86.0%, 67.6%, 53.6%, 44.1%, 40.2% in the repeat hepatectomy group, with no significant difference between the two groups (x2=1.610, P＞0.05). The cumulative 4-, 5-year survival rates of the PRFA group were significant higher than those in the repeat hepatectomy group (x2=4.682, 4. 196, P ＜ 0.05). The local tumor recurrence rate of the PRFA group was 5% (4/79), and the incisal margin recurrence rate was 3% (2/72) in the repeat hepatectomy group, with no significant difference between the two groups (x2=0.565, P＞0.05). Conclusion As a less invasive treatment method, PRFA is superior to repeat hepatectomy for solitary recurrent HCC with the diameter≤3 cm.     

Autofluorescence bronchoscopy with white light bronchoscopy compared with white light bronchoscopy alone for the detection of precancerous lesions: a European randomised controlled multicentre trial

BACKGROUND: The potential of autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) to detect precancerous lesions in the central airways and its role in lung cancer screening is uncertain. A study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of moderate/severe dysplasia (dysplasia II-III) and carcinoma in situ (CIS) using a newly developed AFB system in comparison with conventional white light bronchoscopy (WLB) alone. METHODS: In a prospective randomised multicentre trial, smokers > or = 40 years of age (> or = 20 pack-years) were stratified into four different risk groups and investigated with either WLB+AFB (arm A) or WLB alone (arm B). RESULTS: 1173 patients (916 men) of mean age 58.7 years were included. Overall (arms A and B), preinvasive lesions (dysplasia II-III and CIS) were detected in 3.9% of the patients. The prevalence of patients with preinvasive lesions in the WLB arm was 2.7% compared with 5.1% in the WLB+AFB arm (p = 0.037). For patients with dysplasia II-III, WLB+AFB increased the detection rate by a factor of 2.1 (p = 0.03), while for CIS the factor was only 1.24 (p = 0.75). The biopsy based sensitivity of WLB alone and WLB+AFB for detecting dysplasia II-III and CIS was 57.9% compared with 82.3% (1.42-fold increase). The corresponding specificity was 62.1% compared with 58.4% (0.94-fold decrease). CONCLUSIONS: This first randomised study of AFB showed that the combination of WLB+AFB was significantly superior to WLB alone in detecting preneoplastic lesions. Our findings do not support the general use of AFB as a screening tool for lung cancer, but suggest that it may be of use in certain groups. The precise indications await further study.     

自发性荧光支气管镜在中心型肺癌诊断中的价值

目的 探讨自发性荧光支气管镜(AFB)在中心型肺癌病人气道检查中的应用价值.方法 2009年9月至2010年3月29例中心型肺癌病人施行了30次AFB和普通白光支气管镜(WLB)检查.其中男23例,女6例;年龄62.2岁.病变位于气管3例,右主支气管1例,右肺上叶9例,右侧中间段支气管1例,右肺中叶1例,右肺下叶4例,左主支气管1例,左肺上叶9例(10次).初诊病例21例,肺癌术后复查8例.采用局部麻醉+静脉持续药物维持的无痛支气管镜检查技术,经口置人荧光支气管镜,先在普通白光状态下全面检查气道,再切换至荧光状态对气道重新检查,对全部可疑病变部位进行活检组织学病理检查.结果 全部病人检查过程顺利,无死亡病例及严重并发症发生.共取活检100处,恶性病变39处,非恶性病变61处.全组中AFB无漏诊,WLB漏诊30处,其中12处为恶性病变,漏诊率30.8%.AFB和WLB对恶性病变诊断的敏感性分别为100%和69.2%.21例初诊病例中,AFB无漏诊,WLB漏诊了23处,其中9处为恶性病变;8例术后常规复查者,AFB无漏诊,WLB漏诊了7处,其中3处为恶性病变.结论 AFB在中心型肺癌病例中可以更准确判断气道内肿瘤侵犯范围,更灵敏发现气道内多发病变,更敏感发现气道内复发病变.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the value of autofluorescence bronchoscope (AFB) in airway examination in central type lung cancer. Methods From Sep 2009 to Mar 2010 ,29 patients ( 23 men , 6 women , median age 62.2 years , range from 34 to 81 years) underwent AFB procedure. There were 3 lesions located at trachea, 1 at right main bronchus, 9 at right upper lobe, 1 at right median bronchus, 1 at right middle lobe, 4 at right lower lobe, 1 at left main bronchus, 9 at left upper lobe.There were 21 preliminary diagnostic cases and 8 postoperative surveillance cases. All procedure was performed under combination of local anaesthesia and general anaesthesia. All patients underwent white light bronchoscopy followed by AFB procedure.All of the suspicious abnormal sites were recorded and biopsied for pathological examination. Results All procedures were safely performed without death or serious complications. 100 specimens were obtained for pathologic examination. Malignant lesion was diagnosed in 39 and non-malignancy in61. All malignant sites were detected by AFB, however WLB missed 12 sites.The sensitivity of AFB and WLB for malignancy were 100% and 69.2%, respectively. In 21 preliminary diagnostic cases,AFB detected all malignancy sites, but WLB missed 23 sites, in which 9 were malignant sites. In 8 rechecked patients, AFB detected all malignancy sites, but WLB missed 7 sites, in which 3 were malignant sites. Conclusion Autofluorescence bronchoscopy could be more accurate in judging the extent of the tumor invasion, more sensitive in finding multiple lesions in airway, more sensitive in detecting early cancer recurrence in postoperative surveillance patients.     

Autofluorescence bronchoscopy in early diagnosis of pulmonary carcinoma

AIM: Autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) has been proposed to widen traditional white light bronchoscopy (WLB) possibilities of early diagnosis of neoplastic and preneoplastic lesions of the tracheo-bronchial mucosa in high risk groups. The authors report their study on AFB with the aim of establishing its role in the early diagnosis of bronchogenic carcinoma and its positive predictive value (PPV) compared and associated to WLB. METHODS: From May 2002 to May 2004 we performed WLB and AFB in 213 patients (177 males, 36 females), mean age 63.7 years (range 18-84 years), who were divided into 2 main groups (group A: patients at risk for bronchogenic carcinoma, n=82; group B: patients to be operated on for bronchogenic carcinoma, n=131). In total, 237 WLB-AFB were performed (101 in group A, 136 in group B) and 77 biopsies for pathological examination. RESULTS: The 2 tools (WLB and AFB) were concordant in 156 (66%) and discordant in 81 (34%) cases. Considering the biopsies performed, we obtained a PPV of 26% for lesions visible with WLB, of 40% for those visible with AFB, of 38% for those visible with the association of both. In group A, in 56 patients of the follow-up subgroup, we found 2 dysplastic areas and 1 carcinoma in situ. In group B there was a discordant extension of the pathologic area visible with WLB and with AFB in 30 cases which was positive in 18 of them at histological examination. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, AFB has revealed to be a valid tool for both early diagnosis of neoplastic recurrences or a second primary lung neoplasia in patients in follow-up after resection and preoperative evaluation of resection margins in patients candidate to surgery. More studies are needed to widen its indications in the early diagnosis in high risk groups, to improve its potentialities and optimize its learning curve in order to establish the procedural guide lines.     

Pattern of recurrence and survival of c-Ia NSCLC diagnosed by transpleural methods

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate if transpleural diagnostic methods as percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) or tumour wedge resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) impact on local recurrence and long term survival of patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Records concerning 179 patients with peripheral c-Ia NSCLC who underwent complete resection from 1994 to 2000 have been reviewed. Patients were randomized into two groups according to the diagnostic method employed, as follows: in group I (N.=63) diagnosis was obtained by bronchoscopy; in group II (N.=116) diagnosis was obtained by FNAB (N.=59) or tumour wedge resection by VATS (N.=57) after a negative bronchoscopy. Survival curves were compared using log-rank test. Distribution of frequencies was analyzed with Chi-square and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The two groups of patients did not significantly differ in terms of age, gender, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, comorbidities, histological type and tumour size; pathologic stage IIb was more frequent in group I. At a median follow-up of 48 months, (range 2-108 months), local recurrence was found in 9.5% (N.=6) of the patients in group I and in 12.5% (N.=15) of patients in group II (P=NS); distant metastasis were found in 28.6% (N.=18) of patients in group I and in 13.8% (N.=16) in group II (P=0.03). Patients in group II had a statistically better five-year survival rate than patients in group I (70% and 55% respectively P=0.016). CONCLUSION: FNAB and tumour wedge resection by VATS represent valuable diagnostic methods for lung cancers, since they do not seem to increase the risk of local recurrence. On the other hand, tumours diagnosed by bronchoscopy have a worse prognosis, that may be related to their higher metastatic potential rather than to diagnostic procedure itself.     

Photodynamic therapy for synchronous occult bronchial cancer 17 years after pneumonectomy

We present a patient with radiologically occult double synchronous bronchial neoplastic lesions 17 years after right pneumonectomy. Chest radiograph and CT scan of the thorax showed no abnormalities of the residual lung fields nor mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Standard white light bronchoscopy (WLB) revealed a tumour in the left lower lobe bronchus. Autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) indicated two abnormal fluorescing areas; one in the left lower lobe (as per WLB) and the other in the right lower lateral wall of the trachea. Both of these proved to be neoplastic. The two lesions were treated by bronchoscopic photodynamic therapy (PDT) with complete response so far for 10 months. AFB played a crucial role in diagnosis and ensuring completeness of treatment by PDT in this case with encouraging early results illustrating the respective value of AFB and PDT in such cases.     

Relevance of an intensive postoperative follow-up after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND: Although a minimal follow-up with periodic clinic visits and chest radiographs is usually recommended after complete operation for non-small cell lung cancer, the ideal follow-up has not been defined yet. Objectives of this prospective study were to determine the feasibility of an intensive surveillance program and to analyze its influence on patient survival. METHODS: Follow-up consisted of physical examination and chest roentgenogram every 3 months and fiberoptic bronchoscopy and thoracic computed tomographic scan with sections of the liver and adrenal glands every 6 months. Influence of patient and recurrence characteristics on survival from recurrence was successively analyzed using the log-rank test and a Cox model adjusted for treatment. RESULTS: Among the 192 eligible patients, recurrence developed in 136 patients (71%) and was asymptomatic in 36 patients (26%). In 35 patients, recurrence was asymptomatic and detected by a scheduled procedure: thoracic computed tomographic scan in 10 (28%) patients and fiberoptic bronchoscopy in 10. Fifteen patients (43%) had a thoracic recurrence treated with curative intent. From the date of recurrence, 3-year survival was 13% in all patients and 31% in asymptomatic patients whose recurrence was detected by a scheduled procedure. Asymptomatic recurrences (p < 0.001), female sex (p < 0.001), performance status 2 or less (p = 0.01), and age 61 years or younger (p = 0.01) were shown to be significantly favorable prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: This intensive follow-up is feasible and may improve survival by detecting recurrences after surgery for non-small cell lung cancer at an asymptomatic stage.     

腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术疗效分析

目的 探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的疗效.方法 比较2000年9月至2004年12月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治的99例腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术(腹腔镜组)患者和198例开腹结直肠癌根治术(开腹组)患者局部复发及生存情况的差异.两组各随访时间段的局部复发率、生存率计算采用寿命表法,局部复发率及生存率的比较采用Wilcoxon(Gehan)检验或X2检验及Fisher确切概率法,复发间隔时间、生存时间的比较均采用非参数Wilcoxan秩和检验.结果 腹腔镜组2、3年局部复发率均为3.0%,总的局部复发率3.0%(3/99);开腹组2、3年局部复发率分别为2.6%和4.0%,总的局部复发率为3.5%(7/198),两组局部复发率比较差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.002,P>0.05).两组局部复发的患者中位生存时间分别为15个月(7～24个月)和11个月(2～28个月),差异无统计学意义(U-15.500,P>0.05).两组局部复发的患者1年生存率分别为33.3%和42.9%,2年生存率分别为0和42.9%,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.120,P>0.05).结论 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与开腹结直肠癌根治术有同样的疗效,且安全可行,不会增加肿瘤的复发率.     

Postsurgical stage I bronchogenic carcinoma: morbid implications of recurrent disease

Three hundred forty-six patients with post-surgical non-small cell Stage I bronchogenic carcinoma were followed from 5.0 to 10.8 years (median, 7.0 years). Recurrent cancer developed in 135 patients (39%). Seventy-five recurrences were nonregional metastases (55.6%); 35 (25.9%), a subsequent primary lung cancer; and 25 (18.5%), local recurrence only. The rate of recurrent lung cancer decreased from 15.0 patients per 100 patient-years the first postoperative year to 2.3 the seventh and subsequent years. The rate of recurrence varied among the three different types of recurrent cancer. Five years after pulmonary resection, 70.0% of patients with T1 N0 neoplasms had no evidence of recurrence compared with 58.2% of patients with T2 N0 tumors (p = 0.012) and only 31.8% of patients with T1 N1 neoplasms (p less than 0.001). There was no significant difference in overall rate of recurrence among the various cell types. Currently, 174 patients are alive. Lung cancer survival (Kaplan-Meier) was 69.1% at 5 years and 61.9% at 9 years. At 2 years following detection of subsequent lung cancer, 51.8% of patients with subsequent primary lung cancer had survived lung cancer compared with 23.4% for those with local recurrence and only 8.9% for those with nonregional metastases.     

2cm与3cm切缘宽度在乳腺癌保乳手术中的疗效及美容效果比较

目的:探讨2cm与3cm切缘宽度在乳腺癌保乳手术中的疗效及美容效果的比较。方法:入选我院2008年5月至2012年11月收治的64例进行保乳的乳腺癌患者为观察对象,随机分为两组,分别采用2cm和3cm切缘长度,观察两组患者的手术疗效,并对两组患者美容效果评分进行比较。结果:2cm切缘组的危险因素阳性的比例明显高于3cm切缘组(P0.05),差异具有统计学意义;两组在局部复发率、远处转移率及3年以上生存率方面差异无统计学意义(P0.05);2cm切缘组的乳房美容优良率明显高于3cm切缘组(P0.05),差异具有统计学意义。结论:乳腺癌保乳手术行局部扩大切除时,2cm切缘宽度的临床疗效与3cm切缘宽度的效果接近,且术后乳房美容效果更佳,因此切缘2cm宽度已经基本足够,无需进一步扩大切缘宽度。