The smoking behaviour of military nurses: the relationship to job stress, job satisfaction and social support

Three hundred and seven nurses at a large military medical centre were sent and completed an anonymous questionnaire which measured their smoking status along with job stress, job satisfaction and social support, as well as a variety of demographic factors. Three groups of nurses were defined on the basis of their response to the smoking status questions: those who have never smoked (54%), former smokers (23%) and current smokers (22%). The results revealed that the current smokers reported significantly (P less than 0.05) more job stress, job dissatisfaction and less social support than either former smokers or those who had never smoked. Further, the former smokers reported significantly less social support, defined from a variety of perspectives, than those who had never smoked. These were not as important in predicting amount smoked (number of cigarettes per day) among the current smoker group as they were in predicting differences between the different smoking status groups. The results suggest the need to incorporate the issues of social support and to a lesser extent job stress/satisfaction issues into smoking cessation programmes aimed at this population.     

Patient satisfaction and discussion of smoking cessation during clinical visits

OBJECTIVE: To learn whether patients who smoke and who receive smoking cessation information during medical office visits were less likely to be satisfied with the smoking cessation help they received than patients who smoke but who did not receive such information. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 3703 current cigarette smokers were identified by a mailing in November 1998 to 163,596 members of 2 Minnesota health plans, and 2714 (77.3%) responses to a 44-item questionnaire were available for analysis. Using hierarchical analysis to control confounding variables, we assessed the relationship between patient-reported smoking cessation support actions at the last physician visit and satisfaction "with the help received from your doctor about quitting smoking." RESULTS: Smokers were very satisfied (12.0%), satisfied (25.3%), neutral (48.6%), and dissatisfied or very dissatisfied (13.5%) with physician help. After controlling for other characteristics, the 1898 patients who reported that they had been asked about tobacco use or advised to quit during the latest visit had 10 percentage point greater satisfaction ratings and 5 percentage point less dissatisfaction than those not reporting such discussions (P<.001). Smokers reporting no interest in quitting at the time of the latest visit also demonstrated greater satisfaction in association with these actions. CONCLUSION: Smoking cessation interventions during physician visits were associated with increased patient satisfaction with their care among those who smoke. This information should reduce concerns of physicians or nurses about providing tobacco cessation assistance to patients during office visits.     

Prevalence of patients continuing to smoke after vascular interventions

INTRODUCTION: Smoking is one of the most important risk factors for the development and progression of atherosclerosis. Smoking cessation is an obligatory element in the management of vascular problems and in patients scheduled for vascular interventions. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of patients smoking before and after vascular surgical procedures and to evaluate the requirements for inpatient programs for smoking cessation and nicotine replacement therapy. METHODS: 500 patients admitted for vascular interventions were included in this prospective study. Smoking status was evaluated both objectively and subjectively. All patients underwent measurements of exhaled breath carbon monoxide to quantify nicotine dependency and all answered a standardized Fagerstr?m questionnaire both on admission and after surgery to identify current smokers. RESULTS: Of 500 vascular patients included in the study, only 70 (14 %) never had smoked, 243 (49 %) had given up smoking before admission and 161 (32 %) were current smokers. Of the current smokers, 64 (40 %) did not smoke during hospitalization but 97 (60 %) continued to smoke in hospital. Of these 97 patients, 78 (80 %) were men and 19 women; their mean age was 61 +/- 4 years (range 40-84). Four patients had surgery for infrarenal aortic aneurysm, 40 underwent carotid endarterectomy and 53 had peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAD). There was no difference between abstinent patients and continuing smokers in previous cigarette consumption or Fagerstr?m score, a predictor for long-term smoking behavior. Patients with carotid artery stenosis were significantly more abstinent while hospitalized (P = 0.006); patients with PAD, however, were more likely to continue smoking as inpatients (P = 0.004). Sixty-five percent of continuing smokers stated that they would stop smoking in hospital if counseling and nicotine replacement therapy were provided. With regard to their predominant location of atherosclerosis, patients with PAD were less willing than those with carotid stenosis to abstain from smoking while hospitalized (53 % vs 88 %, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients admitted for vascular surgery are smokers. More than half of these continue to smoke in the hospital, an environment where smoking is prohibited by law. Counseling, nicotine replacement therapy and smoking-cessation programs are urgently needed for vascular surgical inpatients.     

Nurses' smoking behaviour related to cessation practice

AIM: To examine the smoking behaviour, knowledge and attitudes of nurses, their willingness to provide smoking cessation support to patients, the accessibility of training in this area and their willingness to undertake future training in this area. METHOD: A randomised sample of qualified nurses (n = 1,074) in statutory, private and voluntary sectors and across a variety of specialties were surveyed by postal questionnaire. Four focus groups were conducted in various settings before and after the survey. RESULTS: Of those who took part in the survey, 55% had never smoked, 19% were ex-smokers and 26% were smokers. Most agreed that nurses have a responsibility to help those who want to quit smoking. However, nurses who smoked rated their ability to help patients and their effectiveness as a role model lower than nurses who were ex-smokers or non-smokers. CONCLUSION: Smoking prevalence among nurses is no greater than in the general female population. Nurses who smoke are less motivated to provide cessation support for patients, have less positive attitudes to the value of smoking cessation, are less likely to have received smoking cessation training and are less likely to want further training. These results have implications for nurses' own smoking status, as well as their attitudes to cessation training, health promotion practice and future research.     

Results of a randomized controlled trial of intervention to implement smoking guidelines in Veterans Affairs medical centers: increased use of medications without cessation benefit

BACKGROUND: The AHRQ Clinical Practice Guideline for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence recommends screening and treatment of all tobacco users. Effective methods to implement recommendations are needed because simple guideline dissemination does not necessarily result in changes in practice. OBJECTIVES: The Guideline Implementation for Tobacco (GIFT) study tested an organizational intervention to improve Guideline implementation. RESEARCH DESIGN: GIFT randomized 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers to intervention or control conditions. We trained prime movers at each site to improve identification of smoking status, promote primary care interventions and increase availability of smoking cessation medications. Sites and patients were evaluated before and after intervention. SUBJECTS: GIFT included 20 Veterans Affairs medical centers and 5678 subjects. MEASURES: Data regarding smoking status, delivery of treatment, medication use, and smoking cessation were collected from participant surveys, medical record review, survey of site leaders, and Pharmacy Benefits Management. RESULTS: The intervention did not increase participant report of being asked about smoking status or receipt of counseling. It did increase the rate of identification of smoking status in the medical record (P = 0.0001) but did not increase the rate of counseling to stop smoking. Site level data showed no increase in the number of patients receiving smoking cessation medications or dollars spent on medications. Individual smoker data showed a significant increase in the use of medications for smoking cessation in intervention sites (odds ratio = 6.89, P < 0.0001); however, only a small minority of smokers received medication even after the intervention. There was no difference in smoking cessation rates between participants at the intervention and treatment sites. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that improvements in smoking cessation rates are likely to require more intensive intervention in this population.     

The impact of socioeconomic and demographic factors on the utilization of smoking cessation medications in patients hospitalized with cardiovascular disease in Nova Scotia, Canada

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether any demographic or socioeconomic factors affect the use of smoking cessation medications in patients hospitalized with heart disease. METHOD: Data were obtained from the Improving Cardiovascular Outcomes in Nova Scotia (ICONS) Canada database, which includes a registry of all hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, or atrial fibrillation since October 1997. Patients agreeing to provide follow-up were sent an enrollment survey to determine demographic and socioeconomic factors including household income, educational background and private drug insurance plans. RESULTS: Between 15 October 1997 and 31 December 2000, 5442 patients who were current smokers and 270 patients using a smoking cessation medication were admitted to hospital registered in the ICONS database. An enrollment survey was completed by 1071 current smokers and 77 patients using a smoking cessation agent. CONCLUSION: Higher education level, presence of private drug insurance plans, and less difficulty paying for basic needs were associated with higher use of smoking cessation medications.     

Smoking habits and predictors of continued smoking in patients with acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: Most patients with acute coronary syndrome quit smoking when hospitalized, although several have been found to relapse and resume smoking within 3 months. AIM: This paper reports a study to identify factors that can predict who will resume smoking after hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome. METHODS: Patients (n = 1320) below the age of 75 years, admitted to a Swedish university hospital coronary care unit with acute coronary syndromes, between September 1995 and September 1999, were consecutively included. Data were collected from hospital medical records and included information on previous clinical history, former illnesses and smoking. During their hospitalization, an experienced nurse interviewed the patients by using a structured questionnaire to obtain additional information. Patients were followed up 3 months after the discharge. Those who continued to smoke (non-quitters) were compared with those who had stopped (quitters) with regard to age, sex, medical history, clinical course, and intention to quit. To identify factors independently related to continued smoking, a logistical regression in a formal forward stepwise mode was used. RESULTS: Of the patients admitted, 33% were current smokers. Three months after discharge, 51% of these patients were still smoking. There were no significant differences in age, gender or marital status between non-quitters and quitters. In a multivariate analysis, independent predictors of continued smoking were: non-participation in the heart rehabilitation programme (P = 0.0008); use of sedatives/antidepressants at time of admission (P = 0.001); history of cerebral vascular disease (P = 0.002), history of previous cardiac event (P = 0.01); history of smoking-related pulmonary disease (P = 0.03) and cigarette consumption at index (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Smoking patients who do not participate in a heart rehabilitation programme may need extra help with smoking cessation. The findings may provide means of identifying patients in need of special intervention.     

Smoking cessation in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from a controlled study of an intervention programme in primary healthcare in Sweden

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an intervention programme on smoking cessation in patients with diabetes mellitus in primary healthcare. DESIGN: Regional controlled intervention study. SETTING: Seventeen primary healthcare centres in Sweden. INTERVENTION: In the intervention centres, nurses with education in diabetes were given one half-day of training in motivational interviewing and smoking cessation. An invitation to participate in a smoking cessation group was mailed to patients from the intervention centres followed by a telephone call from the patient's diabetes nurse. The nurses who intervened were specially educated in smoking cessation. The control group received a letter containing advice to stop smoking and information about a one-year follow-up. PATIENTS: Daily smokers with diabetes mellitus, 30-75 years of age. In the intervention centres 241 patients fulfilled the criteria and in the control centres 171 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported smoking habits after one year. RESULTS: In total, 21% of the smokers accepted group treatment. After 12 months, 20% (42/211) in the intervention centres reported that they had stopped smoking and 7% (10/140) in the control centres; 40% (19/47) of the smokers who had participated in group treatment reported that they had stopped smoking. CONCLUSION: A computerized record system for patients in primary healthcare was used to identify diabetic patients who were smokers. The selected group was invited to a stop smoking programme. At a one-year follow-up significantly more patients in the intervention centres had stopped smoking compared with patients in the control centres.     

Nurses, smoking, and the workplace

The purpose of this study was to examine attitudes and experiences of nurses regarding smoking and smoking cessation in the workplace. Eight focus groups were conducted with current or former smokers (n = 60). A questionnaire provided information about smoking history. Content analysis revealed six themes: taking breaks, stress and smoking, social support from colleagues, hiding smoking from patients and their families, impact of workplace smoking restrictions, and challenges to smoking cessation in the workplace. Nurses who smoke were perceived as taking more breaks and spending less time with patients than those who do not smoke. These findings document the impact of smoking among nurses in the workplace. Strategies are needed to support smoking cessation efforts of nurses as an important occupational health issue.     

A STUDY OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF ANTIBIOTIC USE IN THE MEDICAL WARDS OF A TERTIARY TEACHING HOSPITAL IN MALAYSIA

A prospective study was conducted to determine the proportion of patients who received an antibiotic within 12 hours of admission to the medical wards. During the four-week study, 234 patients were admitted to medical wards from casualty; 68 patients (29%) received an antibiotic. The survey indicated that antibiotics were inappropriate in 22–65% of those treated. This study also shows that as many as 67% of patients who received intravenous antibiotics could have been equally well treated with oral preparations.     

Nurses'' Tobacco-Related Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice in Four Major Cities in China

PURPOSE: To (a) identify Chinese nurses' tobacco-related knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP), including perception of competency in smoking-cessation interventions; (b) identify barriers and facilitators to smoking cessation interventions to patients; and (c) assess the learning needs and smoking status of nurses. Design: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in four major cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Chongqing) in China from November to December 2003. METHODS: 2,888 registered nurses working in hospitals affiliated with five university schools of nursing in these cities were invited to complete a questionnaire. An instrument used to assess tobacco-related KAP in Hong Kong was translated into Chinese and pilot tested to ensure reliability and validity. FINDINGS: 2,179 questionnaires were returned and after exclusion of the grossly incomplete questionnaires, 1,690 were included in the present analysis. Only 2% of participants were current and 1% were former smokers; most had not received training for smoking-cessation interventions as part of their nursing education program. Two-thirds recognized smoking as a leading cause of preventable death and that smoking cessation was the most cost effective intervention, but only a third routinely assisted patients' quit attempts. Nurses who received training reported greater competence in providing smoking-cessation intervention, and more frequent practice of cessation interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Chinese nurses had some knowledge about the health effects of tobacco use, but seldom practiced smoking-cessation interventions. Those who had prior training had greater competence and more practice. Including tobacco control, especially smoking cessation, in nursing curricula in China has the potential to save millions of lives.     

Intervention study for smoking cessation in diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial in both clinical and primary care settings

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse-managed smoking cessation intervention in diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This randomized controlled clinical trial involved 280 diabetic smokers (age range 17-84 years) who were randomized either into control (n = 133) or intervention (n = 147) groups at 12 primary care centers and 2 hospitals located in Navarre, Spain. The intervention consisted of a 40-min nurse visit that included counseling, education, and contracting information (a negotiated cessation date). The follow-up consisted of telephone calls, letters, and visits. The control group received the usual care for diabetic smokers. Baseline and 6-month follow-up measurements included smoking status (self-reported cessation was verified by urine cotinine concentrations), mean number of cigarettes smoked per day, and stage of change. RESULTS: At the 6-month follow-up, the smoking cessation incidence was 17.0% in the intervention group compared with 2.3% in the usual care group, which was a 14.7% difference (95% CI 8.2-21.3%). Among participants who continued smoking, a significant reduction was evident in the average cigarette consumption at the 6-month follow-up. The mean number of cigarettes per day decreased from 20.0 at baseline to 15.5 at 6 months for the experimental group versus from 19.7 to 18.1 for the control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: A structured intervention managed by a single nurse was shown to be effective in changing the smoking behavior of diabetic patients.     

Promoting smoking cessation in the rehabilitation setting

Cigarette smoking is a known risk factor in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Smoking also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, peptic ulcers, and cancer of several organs among middle-aged individuals and the elderly. In the elderly, smoking has also been associated with a general decline in physical functioning as a result of the increased incidence of chronic illnesses. The prevalence of smoking among community-dwelling adults aged 65 to 74 yr has been estimated to be 18% for men and 15% for women. More than 30% of Americans who are hospitalized each year are smokers. Although there are no published studies that have established the prevalence of smoking in a rehabilitation population, these data and our own clinical experience suggest that smoking continues to be a significant health problem for many persons who enter the inpatient rehabilitation setting. Because most hospitals have adopted a smoke-free policy, hospitalization itself may initiate a period of nonsmoking in patients who were smokers at the time of their admission. In addition, some smokers choose to quit smoking after stroke or other medical crisis caused by the health risks associated with cigarette smoking. However, research has also revealed a rather low-smoking cessation rate (30%) among smokers who have had a transient ischemic attack despite the health benefits associated with smoking cessation. Given the significant health risks associated with cigarette smoking, particularly in the elderly and those with cerebrovascular compromise, the effects of smoking on the patient's health should be discussed with the patient during inpatient rehabilitation. Unfortunately, given the current healthcare demands of reducing lengths of hospitalization and the focus on functional outcomes, health promotion issues, such as smoking cessation, nutrition, exercise, may not receive the attention that they deserve. Despite these constraints, we believe that the inpatient rehabilitation setting provides an opportunity for a "teachable moment" to introduce the idea of smoking cessation to the active smoker or to encourage continued smoking cessation and relapse prevention to those patients who have not smoked since their admission to the acute care hospital. If instituted in an effective manner, we believe that there could be significant healthcare benefits in establishing a formal smoking cessation or relapse prevention program in the rehabilitation setting.     

The participation of health professionals in a smoking-cessation programme positively influences the smoking cessation advice given to patients

This study assessed the degree of smoking cessation advice given by health professionals, before and after their participation in a smoking cessation study using bupropion-sustained release (bupropion SR, Zyban). A total of 690 physicians and nurses who had smoked an average of 10 cigarettes/day over the previous year and were motivated to quit smoking, were randomised in a double-blind manner to receive bupropion SR (days 1-3, 150 mg/day; days 4-49, 150 mg twice daily) or placebo for 7 weeks, with follow-up to week 52. All subjects received regular follow-up and brief motivational support throughout the study. Questions regarding their smoking cessation advice formed part of the study, with the aim of determining whether study participants became more proactive with their smoking cessation advice. A positive shift from baseline to end of study was observed with respect to the advice and support they gave to their smoking patients. These changes were not related to study treatment or current smoking status. An increase in advising patients to quit smoking and in offering cessation counselling was observed. Participation in a smoking-cessation study by physicians and nurses who smoke has a positive effect, regardless of study medication, in smoking cessation advice and counselling given to their patients.     

GPs have key role in helping patients to stop smoking

Eighteen per cent of all deaths in adults aged 35 or over in England are still attributable to smoking. Almost all these premature deaths could be avoided if smokers stopped before their mid-thirties but only a quarter of people who have ever smoked regularly manage to quit by this age. Advice from the patient's GP is one of the most important triggers to a smoker making an attempt to quit. All patients attending a surgery for any reason who have smoked within the past three years should be offered advice on stopping smoking. Smokers without smoking-related diseases are just as likely to respond to advice as those with them. It is also important to re-assess the status of former smokers who were recorded as having stopped within the past three years. Half of those who stopped six months ago will relapse at some point as will 40% of those who stopped a year ago. Offer help with stopping to all smokers. The National Centre for Smoking Cessation and Training has launched a new online training module on how GPs can best deliver smoking cessation support to their patients. Optimum treatment involves behavioural support plus one of the smoking cessation medications. Behavioural support includes a number of specific behaviour change techniques that enhance the smoker's chances of remaining abstinent. These include: measurement of carbon monoxide in expired air; advice on best use of medication and helping smokers to put in place a clear 'not a puff' rule.     

The Emergency Department as a Potential Site for Smoking Cessation Intervention: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of physician counseling and referral on smoking cessation rates and attendance at a smoking cessation program. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized clinical trial set in a suburban, community teaching hospital emergency department (ED). During study hours, dedicated research associates enrolled consecutive, stable, oriented patients who were smokers. Eligible, consenting patients were randomized to one of two intervention groups. The control group received a two-page "Stop Smoking" pamphlet from the American Heart Association (AHA). Patients in the intervention group were given the AHA pamphlet along with pharmacologic information and standardized counseling by the attending emergency physician, including written and oral referral to a smoking cessation program. The primary outcome measures were telephone contact/attendance at the smoking cessation program by the intervention group and the rate of smoking cessation in both study groups at three months post-ED visit. Categorical data were analyzed by chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Rank data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests and continuous data by t-tests. All tests were two-tailed with alpha set at 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients were enrolled; 78 were randomized to the intervention group. Nearly 70% of patients (103) were available for telephone follow-up. The study groups were statistically similar with regard to baseline demographic characteristics and the prevalence of moderate or severe nicotine addiction. None of the patients (0%) in the intervention group contacted or attended the smoking cessation program during the study period (95% CI = 0-4%). The percentages of patients who stopped smoking after three months were similar in the two groups [10.4% (5/48) control vs 10.9% (6/55) intervention; p = 1]. CONCLUSION: The authors found no difference in the smoking cessation rates between ED patients who received written material and those who were counseled by emergency physicians. Referral of patients who smoked to a cessation program was unsuccessful.     

阶段性改变模式在高血压患者戒烟中的效果研究

目的 探讨阶段性改变模式在帮助高血压患者戒烟中的效果.方法 在苏州某医院通过方便取样方法,收集89例吸烟或曾吸烟的高血压患者作为研究对象,将其随机分为干预组(44例)和对照组(45例).干预组住院时期及出院后1周接受基于阶段性改变模式的戒烟干预措施,对照组则接受常规戒烟教育.出院后第1～3个月比较两组之间吸烟改变阶段、...