Omental evisceration through an abdominal stab wound: is exploratory laparotomy mandatory?

The authors reviewed and analysed the records of 75 patients with omental and bowel evisceration as a result of abdominal stab wounds to discover whether omental prolapse makes laparotomy mandatory. Major intraabdominal injuries were found in 82.7% of the total group, 82.9% in those with omental protrusion and 82.5% in patients with bowel prolapse. The nature of the injuries and the incidence of multiple organ trauma were similar in the two groups. Negative laparotomy did not cause important morbidity. The authors conclude that omental herniation after stab wounds of the abdomen should routinely prompt exploratory celiotomy.     

Evisceration Following Abdominal Stab Wounds: Analysis of 66 Cases

Background  Abdominal stab wounds with evisceration remain an indication for emergency laparotomy. The purpose of this study was validate a policy of mandatory laparotomy for organ evisceration and a policy of selective nonoperative management with serial physical abdominal examination for omentum evisceration. Methods  The charts of 379 patients with abdominal stab wounds who presented to our Level I trauma center over a 3-year (January 2005 to December 2007) period were retrospectively reviewed. Altogether, 66 (17.4%) patients with evisceration were identified and included in the study. Indications for mandatory laparotomy were peritonitis, hemodynamic instability, organ evisceration, and a high spinal cord or severe head injury with an abdominal stab wound. Further data gathered included the organ eviscerated, intraabdominal organs injured, and complications. Injury severity was categorized using the revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS), and penetrating abdominal index (PATI). Results  Organ and omentum evisceration occurred in 35 (53%) and 31 (47%) patients, respectively. Organs eviscerated were as follows (number of patients): small bowel in 27 (40.9%), stomach in 2 (3%), colon in 1 (1.5%), small bowel and stomach in 2 (3%), and small bowel and colon in 3 (4.5%). The mean RTS, ISS, and PATI scores were 7.71, 13.74, and 8.26, respectively. Only two (5.7%) patients with organ evisceration underwent a negative laparotomy. In total, 23 patients with omentum evisceration (21 with peritonitis, 1 with a head injury, 1 who failed abdominal observation) underwent therapeutic laparotomy. Six patients with omentum evisceration were managed successfully nonoperatively. Two patients with left thoracoabdominal omentum evisceration underwent delayed laparoscopy, which revealed a diaphragm injury in one patient. Overall, 57 (86.4%) patients with evisceration had an intraabdominal injury that required repair. Conclusions  Evisceration should continue to prompt operative intervention. An exception can be made to a select few patients with omentum evisceration with benign abdominal findings.     

The role of CT scan in evaluation for laparotomy in patients with stab wounds of the abdomen

Not every patient with a penetrating stab wound of the abdomen requires laparotomy. This report evaluates use of computerized tomographic (CT) scan in assessment of stable asymptomatic patients, with penetrating abdominal stab wounds, as an indicator of the necessity of abdominal exploration. In a prospective study, 50 patients with abdominal stab wounds were treated successfully with observation only, after admission abdominal CT scan interpretation was negative for pathology in 45 patients. In the remaining five it was of such minor nature that conservative management was justified (Series I). Twenty-eight stable asymptomatic patients with penetrating stab wounds of the abdomen comparable to the ones in Series I had CT scan on admission, and then underwent exploratory laparotomy independent of their CT scan findings (Series II). Of these 28 patients, 22 had correct CT scan findings verified by laparotomy, three were false positive for intra-abdominal injury resulting in negative explorations, and three patients had such nonspecific findings as fluid or air in the abdomen incompatible with precise organ injury identification. Our study shows that CT scan in patients with abdominal stab wounds identifies solid organ injury with great specificity and sensitivity, evaluates the retroperitoneum well, and detects peritoneal penetration by demonstrating intraperitoneal fluid or air. CT scan was unreliable in detection of bowel injury and does not demonstrate diaphragmatic injuries.     

Indications for early mandatory laparotomy in abdominal stab wounds

BACKGROUND: Patients with an abdominal stab wound presenting with shock, peritonitis or evisceration are usually subjected to early laparotomy, although very few studies have been done to validate the criteria. METHODS: In a retrospective study of 209 consecutive patients with stab wounds of the anterior abdomen, flank or lower chest, 23 clinical and radiological criteria were evaluated for their accuracy in predicting the presence of significant abdominal organ injury. RESULTS: Overall, 89 patients (43 per cent) had a significant abdominal injury. The criteria with the highest positive predictive values for significant injury were: signs of continuing haemorrhage in initially normotensive patients (86 per cent), shock on admission (83 per cent) and generalized peritonitis (81 per cent). No positive direct or indirect signs of peritoneal penetration including omental evisceration, extraluminal air on plain radiography, or free peritoneal fluid on abdominal ultrasonography were independent predictors of significant injury. CONCLUSION: Signs of major internal haemorrhage or generalized peritonitis are reliable criteria by themselves for early laparotomy. Peritoneal penetration is a poor indicator of significant organ injury and warrants direct organ-specific evaluation, such as computed tomography or laparoscopy, to identify patients who can safely be treated without operation.     

Indications for operation in abdominal stab wounds. A prospective study of 651 patients.

This prospective study comprises 651 patients with knife wounds of the anterior abdomen. Three hundred and forty-five patients (53%) had symptoms of an acute abdomen on admission and were operated on immediately. The remaining 306 patients (47%) were managed conservatively with serial clinical examinations. This group included 26 patients with omental or intestinal evisceration, 18 patients with air under the diaphragm, 12 patients with blood found on abdominal paracentesis, and 18 patients with shock on admission. Only 11 patients (3.6%) needed subsequent operation, and there was no mortality. The overall incidence of unnecessary laparotomies was 5% (completely negative, 3%). Of the 467 patients with proven peritoneal penetration, 27.6% had no significant intra-abdominal injury. It is concluded that many abdominal stab wounds can safely be managed without operation. The decision to operate or observe can be made exclusively on clinical criteria. Peritoneal penetration, air under the diaphragm, evisceration of omentum or bowel, blood found on abdominal paracentesis, and shock on admission are not absolute indications for surgery. Alcohol consumption by the patient does not interfere with the clinical assessment.     

Gunshot and stab injuries of the abdomen]

From 1973 to 1991 a total of 422 patients underwent surgery because of an abdominal trauma. 12 patients had gunshot wounds and 46 patients stab wounds. In a retrospective study the diagnostic and therapeutic procedure and the indication for surgery are analysed. After gunshot wounds of the abdomen we always performed a laparotomy. In 11 od 12 cases we found serious intra-abdominal injuries. Only in one case the laparotomy was "unnecessary", because of a tangential wound without penetrating of the abdominal wall. After stab wounds the diagnostic and therapeutic management was more selective. Indications for mandatory laparotomy after stab wounds were a manifest hemorrhagic shock, evisceration and a still left weapon in the abdomen (n = 22). The first clinical examination was completed by ultrasound or peritoneal lavage. Pathological findings like free intraperitoneal fluid or a positive lavage also were indications for laparotomy (n = 9). The other patients were observed closely, including repeated physical examination. The indication for surgery then based on the development of clinical signs. The time between first examination and laparotomy was never more than 12 hours. 39 patients (84.7%) had injuries of intraabdominal organs. 5 patients (10.8%) had a negative laparotomy. The mortality rate was 3.4%, but there was no death as a result of the selective approach.     

Significance of omental evisceration in abdominal stab wounds

Over a 4 year period, 115 patients presented to Parkland Memorial Hospital with omental evisceration after a stab wound to the abdomen. All patients underwent exploratory celiotomy. Serious abdominal injuries were found in 86 patients (75 percent), and half of these had two or more organs injured. The injury rate in patients with omental herniation was three times that of patients with simple stab wounds. No preoperative evaluation technique was reliable in identifying patients without injury. There were no deaths and only a 7 percent incidence of minor complications in patients who underwent negative exploration. Our data suggest that omental evisceration in a patient with an abdominal stab wound portends potentially serious injury and supports the policy of expeditious celiotomy.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic laparoscopy for stab wounds of the anterior abdomen

BACKGROUND: At present, laparoscopy is used mainly as a diagnostic tool in patients with abdominal stab wounds. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two hemodynamically stable patients with isolated stab wounds of the anterior abdomen, thought to be penetrating, were prospectively selected to undergo treatment via a laparoscopic approach. When possible, parenchymal wounds were coagulated or sealed, and wounds to the intestines were sutured or stapled. RESULTS: The results of laparoscopy were negative in 6 (18.8%) of the cases: nonpenetrating wounds in 4 cases and nonsignificant organ injury in 2 cases. A hemoperitoneum was identified in 13 (40.6%) of the cases, and significant organ injuries in 26 (81.3%) of the cases: stomach, 2; small bowel, 5; colon, 2; pancreas, 1; vascular injuries, 4; liver, 5; mesentery, 9. Laparoscopy was therapeutic in 20 (62.3%) of the cases. Conversion to open surgery was required in 6 (18.8%) of the cases. No injuries were missed, and no mortality occurred. Postoperative complications developed in 2 (6.2%) of the cases. The mean hospital stay was 4 days, with no late complications. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy can avoid a number of unnecessary laparotomies and can treat most of the lesions found in hemodynamically stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds.     

Stab injuries of the abdomen in Uganda

The clinical presentation of abdominal stab wounds in Uganda is reviewed, first, in comparison with the reported presentation among the western populations, and secondly, to determine whether a change from routine exploration to a selective intervention policy in the management of these patients was justified.

The important differences include a falling annual incidence of abdominal stab wounds, an absence of drug addiction, a very long delay before admission to hospital, and a very high incidence of evisceration.

There are no geographical factors that preclude the universal application of the selective intervention policy in the management of penetrating injuries of the abdomen. However, the different features of abdominal stab wounds in our patients suggests that the surgeon in Africa must expect to intervene more often than would be the case in the western world.     

Eviszeration von Darm nach Stichverletzung des Abdomens

Study aim

The aim of the study was an estimation of the incidence and clinical aspects of emergency room (ER) parameters of penetrating abdominal injury patients with bowel evisceration.

Study design and methods

The study involved a retrospective cohort analysis of ER data from the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospitals, Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa between September 2000 to May 2005.

Results

Out of 9,010 ER patients, 4,390 suffered penetrating injuries with 8 out of 71 eviscerations due to a single gunshot wound, 60 out of 71 eviscerations due to single stab wounds and 3 further patients suffered multiple injuries. The ER mortality was 1 out of 71(1.6 %) with an average ER mortality of 4.2 %. The only death seen was a single abdominal gunshot wound with vascular injury. The causative mortality due to abdominal stab wounds with evisceration of the bowels was therefore zero. The heart rate in patients with abdominal stab wounds with and without bowel evisceration showed no significant difference, thus mesentery tearing or vagal overstimulation could not be seen, neither with bradycardia nor hypotension.

Conclusion

Evisceration itself is not a cause for increased mortality or cardiovascular instability seen in the ER. There is ample time for diagnostic procedures before laparotomy is performed.     

Prediction of injury caused by penetrating wounds to the abdomen, flank, and back

Controversy about the appropriate evaluation of penetrating abdominal, flank, and back injuries prompted this retrospective review of 311 patients at an urban level 1 trauma center over 5 years. Seventy-five (24%) patients sustained gunshot wounds to the abdomen. All patients with gunshot wounds underwent exploratory laparotomy; results of 67 laparotomies (89%) were positive. Of 236 patients sustaining stab wounds (140 abdominal wounds, 51 flank wounds, 26 back wounds, and 19 wounds to multiple sites), 147 were treated according to a selective protocol, based on results of physical examination, wound exploration, peritoneal lavage, and ancillary diagnostic studies. No injuries were found at celiotomy in three (2%) of these 147 patients. One false-negative result of evaluation of a flank wound occurred. Significant injuries were found in 13 patients (68%) with stab wounds to multiple sites, 61 patients (44%) with abdominal stab wounds, 15 patients (29%) with flank stab wounds, and four patients (15%) with back stab wounds. Mandatory exploration of gunshot wounds is justified. Physical findings of intra-abdominal injury or positive results of peritoneal lavage identify stab wound victims likely to benefit from surgical exploration. A policy of mandatory observation or routine celiotomy for treatment of stab wounds is not justified.     

Self-inflicted stab injury with abdominal evisceration: A case report

Introduction and importanceSelf-inflicted abdominal stab injury with an intention of self-harm is uncommon. Moreover, self-inflicted injury leading to avulsion of the colon has rarely been reported in the literature. We report a case of a 42-years-female with schizoaffective disorder who presented with self-inflicted stab injury on the abdomen resulting in abdominal evisceration.Presentation of caseA 42-years-female with schizoaffective disorder (F25) for 10 years presented to the emergency department with multiple, self-inflicted injuries on the abdomen. A large free portion of the omentum and segment of the bowel were brought in a plastic carry bag. Examination revealed multiple transverse hesitation cuts in the epigastrium and a single deep penetrating transverse cut resulting in the evisceration of the omentum and colon. Intra-operatively, avulsion of a large portion of the greater omentum and missing segment of the mid transverse colon was observed. The patient underwent an immediate abdominal exploration and side-to-side colo-colic anastomosis along with diversion ileostomy. At three months following primary surgery, ileostomy closure was done.ConclusionPatients with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis are at risk of self-harm and in our case a schizoaffective patient presented with self-inflicted injuries that required an emergency abdominal exploration and repair. This case highlights a multi-disciplinary approach for the management of these cases and mandates clinicians and caregivers to be more vigilant to restrict injuries in the future.     

Overview of stab injuries in Far North Queensland: A new insight into the demographics,injury patterns and management

BackgroundCairns Hospital is the northernmost tertiary referral hospital in Far North Queensland (FNQ) and manages trauma from a large catchment area. A large burden of stab injuries occurs in at-risk patient groups, such as Indigenous and mental health patients, in this region. This research aims to present an overview of the demographics, injury patterns, management and outcomes for stabbings injuries in FNQ.MethodsA five-year retrospective single-centre study of all patients treated for neck, torso or junctional stab wounds in Far North Queensland was performed searching for all patients with a coded diagnosis of stabbing or knife injury from 1 March 2016 to 31 March 2021.Results214 knife injuries were identified and 50.5% of those injured identified as Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander. Stabbing injury locations were most commonly the abdomen/flank/pelvis (n = 81) and the chest/thorax (n = 77). Two-thirds of injuries that breached abdominal fascia had concurrent intra-abdominal injury. Hollow viscus injury commonly involved the small bowel (n = 8), colon (n = 5) and stomach (n = 2), whilst the liver was the most frequently injured solid organ (n = 6). There were 19 vascular injuries, excluding the extremities. 89.2% received diagnostic imaging in the emergency department. FAST scan had 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity for intra-abdominal injury at operation. Overall, 35% of patients required an operation. There were only two in-hospital deaths.ConclusionStab injuries annually in FNQ are comparable to other centres in Australia. Overall injury severity was low, with excellent survival rates and outcomes for patients who reached hospital. Operative intervention rates for abdominal stab wounds were low in FNQ compared to available data and imaging again appears protective against negative laparotomy rate.     

Management of penetrating pancreatic trauma: an 11-year experience of a level-1 trauma center

Introduction: We present our experience in the management of penetrating pancreatic injuries, focusing on factors related to complications and death.

Methods: Retrospective trauma registry-based analysis of 62 consecutive patients with penetrating pancreatic injuries during an 11-year period. Overall injury severity was assessed by the injury severity score (ISS) and the penetrating abdominal trauma index (PATI). Pancreatic injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Organ Injury Scaling (OIS). Complications were characterised using standardised definitions. Mortality was recorded as early (within 48 h after admission) and late (after 48 h).

Results: Thirty patients suffered gunshot wounds and 24 had grade I pancreatic injuries. Shotgun and gunshot wounds were more destructive than stab wounds (higher PATI, number of intraabdominal injuries and mortality). Seventeen patients died. Most deaths occurred within 1 h after admission due to massive bleeding and severe associated injuries. Only one death was potentially related to the pancreatic injury. Mortality rate also correlated with pancreatic injury grading. Sixty-one patients had associated intraabdominal injuries. Combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries were present in 13 patients, and five died. Simple drainage was the most common procedure performed. Pancreas-related complications were found in 12 out of 47 patients who survived more than 48 h; intraabdominal abscess (n=7) that was associated with colon injuries, and pancreatic fistula (n=5).

Conclusion: An approach based on injury grade and location is advised. Routine drainage is recommended; distal resection is indicated in the presence of main duct injury, and the management of severe injuries will be tailored according to the overall physiologic status, presence of associated injuries, and duodenal viability. Morbidity and mortality is mainly due to associated injuries.     

Stab wounds of the anterior abdomen. Analysis of a management plan using local wound exploration and quantitative peritoneal lavage.

A management plan for stab wounds to the anterior abdomen incorporating local wound exploration and quantitative peritoneal lavage was applied to 572 patients. One hundred eighty-five of these patients presented with shock, peritonitis, or evisceration and underwent immediate exploratory laparotomy with the finding of an intraperitoneal organ injury in 183 (99%). The remaining 387 patients with a negative physical examination underwent exploration of the stab wound to determine fascial penetration. Wound exploration was negative in 151 of these patients and they were discharged from the emergency room. Two hundred thirty-six additional patients had penetration of the fascia and underwent peritoneal lavage. Ninety-two per cent of patients with lavage counts greater than 50,000 had an intraperitoneal organ injury. No patients with lavage counts less than 1,000 red cells had an organ injury. Forty-three per cent of patients in the intermediate group (1,000-50,000 RBCs/mm3) had an organ injury and 59% included penetration of a hollow viscus. An approach incorporating local wound exploration and quantitative peritoneal lavage followed by exploratory laparotomy for red blood cell counts greater than 1,000 should result in less than 10% negative laparotomies and no missed injuries.     

Non-operative management of abdominal stab wounds--an analysis of 186 patients

BACKGROUND: The modern management of abdominal stab wounds remains controversial and subject to continued reappraisal. In the present study we reviewed patients with abdominal stab wounds to examine and validate a policy of selective non-operative management with serial physical abdominal examination in a busy urban trauma centre with a high incidence of penetrating trauma. METHODS: Over a 12-month period (2005), the records of all patients with abdominal stab wounds were reviewed. Patients with abdominal stab wounds presenting with peritonitis, haemodynamic instability, organ evisceration and high spinal cord injury underwent emergency laparotomy. No local wound exploration, diagnostic peritoneal lavage or ultrasound was used. Haematuria in patients without an indication for emergency surgery was investigated with a contrasted computed tomography (CT) scan. Patients selected for non-operative management were admitted for serial clinical abdominal examination for 24 hours. Patients in whom abdominal findings were negative were given a test feed. If food was tolerated, they were discharged with an abdominal injury form. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-six patients with abdominal stab wounds were admitted. There were 171 (91.9%) males, with a mean age of 29.5 years. Seventy-four patients (39.8%) underwent emergency laparotomy. There were 5 negative laparotomies (6.8%). The remaining 112 patients (60.2%) were assigned for abdominal observation. One hundred (89.3%) of these patients were successfully managed non-operatively. The remaining 12 patients underwent delayed laparotomy, which was negative in 2 cases (16.7%). Non-operative management was successful in 53.8% of patients overall. The overall sensitivity and specificity of serial abdominal examination was 87.3% and 93.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Serial physical examination alone for asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patients with abdominal stab wounds enables a significant reduction in unnecessary laparotomies.     

Gunshot injuries to the liver: the role of selective nonoperative management

BACKGROUND: Selective nonoperative management of blunt liver injuries has become standard practice in most trauma centers. We evaluated the role of selective nonoperative management of gunshot wounds to the liver. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of gunshot wounds to the liver treated in a level I trauma center. Patients with peritoneal signs or hemodynamic instability were operated on without delay. Patients with a soft, nontender abdomen and no signs of heavy bleeding were selected for nonoperative management. Liver injury was diagnosed by CT scan. If peritonitis or signs of substantial internal bleeding developed, an operation was performed; otherwise the patient was discharged within a few days of admission. Analysis was restricted to the group of patients with isolated liver injuries. RESULTS: During a 42-month period, 928 patients were admitted with abdominal gunshot injuries, 152 of whom (16%) had a liver injury. In 52 patients (34% of all liver injuries), the liver was the only injured intraabdominal organ (4 patients had associated kidney or splenic injuries that did not require surgical repair). Thirty-six of the patients (69%) with isolated liver injuries had an emergent operation because of signs of peritonitis or hemodynamic instability. The remaining 16 patients (31%) were selected for nonoperative management (3 patients had associated right kidney injury). Five patients in the observed group required delayed operation because of development of signs of peritonitis (4 patients) or abdominal compartment syndrome (1 patient). The remaining 11 patients (7% of all liver injuries or 21% of isolated liver injuries) were managed successfully without operation. One patient with delayed operation developed multiple complications from abdominal compartment syndrome, and 1 patient in the nonoperative group had a biloma, which was treated with percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Selected patients with isolated grades I and II gunshot wounds to the liver can be managed nonoperatively.     

A prospective comparison of the selective observation and routine exploration methods for penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration

BACKGROUND: Both routine laparotomy and selective observation methods have been used in the treatment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration. There still are some conflicts about these treatment methods. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2003, 61 patients treated in the authors' emergency clinic because of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with organ or omentum evisceration were evaluated prospectively. Excepting those with absolute indications for mandatory laparotomy, these patients were treated by either routine laparotomy or selective observation methods. Their prognosis, rates of unnecessary laparotomy, length of hospital stay, and complications were compared using Fisher's exact test and Student's t test. RESULTS: Nine patients underwent mandatory laparotomy and were therefore excluded from the study. The overall incidence of the patients who had no significant abdominal pathology was 54.1% (33/61). The overall incidence of significant injuries among the asymptomatic patients was 36.5% (19/52). Routine laparotomy was performed for 21 patients, who experienced unnecessary laparotomy and complication rates of 33.33% and 19%, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay in this group was 137.38 +/- 53.25 hours. Of 31 patients, 24 who had been treated by selective observation methods were discharged without laparotomy. The unnecessary laparotomy and complication rates for this group were 6.45% (28.6% for the patients treated surgically) and 3.2%, respectively, whereas the mean length of hospital stay for this group was 81.22 +/- 42.46 hours. There were statistically significant differences in terms of unnecessary laparotomy rates and mean lengths of hospital stay, but no difference in terms of complication rates. CONCLUSION: The selective observation method is safe and superior to routine laparotomy for the treatment of penetrating abdominal stab wounds with omentum evisceration.     

Laparotomy for organ evisceration from abdominal stab wounds: A South African experience

Introduction

Organ evisceration following abdominal stab wound (SW) is currently considered as an absolute indication for mandatory laparotomy due to the high incidence of associated intra-abdominal injuries, but literature describing the spectrum of organ injury encountered is limited.

The spectrum of injuries resulting from posterior abdominal stab wounds: a South African experience

Introduction

The spectrum of injury associated with anterior abdominal stab wounds (SWs) is well established. The literature on the spectrum of organ injury associated with SWs to the posterior abdomen, however, is limited.

Methods

We reviewed our experience of 105 consecutive patients who had established indications for laparotomy managed over a 4-year period in a high volume trauma service in South Africa.

Results

Of the 105 patients, 97 (92%) were male and the overall mean age was 24 years. Fifty-seven patients (54%) had immediate indications for laparotomy. The remaining 48 patients (46%) initially underwent active clinical observation and the indications for laparotomy became apparent during the observation period. Of the 105 laparotomies performed, 94 (90%) were positive and 11 (10%) were negative. Of the 94 positive laparotomies, 92 were therapeutic and 2 were non-therapeutic. A total of 176 organ injuries were identified: 50 (53%) of the 94 patients sustained a single organ injury while the remaining 44 (47%) sustained multiple organ injuries. The most commonly injured organs were the colon (n=63), spleen (n=21) and kidney (n=19).

Conclusions

The pattern of intra-abdominal injuries secondary to SWs to the posterior abdomen is different to that seen with the anterior abdomen. Colonic injury is most commonly encountered, followed by injuries to the spleen and kidney. Clinicians must remain vigilant because of the potential for occult injuries.