Influencing the specificity of drug mixture discriminations by varying the training procedure

Studies of the discriminative stimulus effects of drug mixtures provide an approach to polydrug abuse and to studies on single drugs with multiple effects. The experiments described here investigated whether the use of the AND-OR procedure increases the specificity of drug mixture discriminations. Rats were trained to discriminate a mixture of nicotine (0.4 mg/ kg) plus midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) from saline (AND-discrimination, n = 10) or to discriminate the same mixture from its component drugs alone (AND-OR discrimination, n = 10). The studies used two-lever operant procedures with a tandem variable interval 1 min fixed ratio 10 (FR 10) schedule of food reinforcement. Under AND-discrimination conditions, there was partial generalization to amphetamine and pentobarbitone when each drug was administered singly. With the AND-OR-discrimination, there was no generalization to amphetamine and partial generalization to pentobarbitone. In 'single substitution' tests, pentobarbitone or amphetamine was co-administered with the training doses of nicotine and midazolam, respectively; there was full generalization in the AND-discrimination and no generalization under AND-OR conditions. In 'dual substitution' tests, mixtures of amphetamine plus pentobarbitone produced full generalization under AND-discrimination conditions, and partial generalization in the AND-OR procedure. Wherever comparisons were made, generalization was less under AND-OR- than under the AND-discrimination procedure, confirming that the AND-OR procedure can increase the specificity of discriminations based on drug mixtures. The similarity with findings reported previously for training with mixtures of amphetamine plus pentobarbitone suggests that this may reflect a general principle rather than a phenomenon restricted to particular training drugs.     

Influence of training paradigm on specificity of drug mixture discriminations.

Generalization to different drugs and drug mixtures has been examined in rats trained to discriminate a mixture of amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg) plus pentobarbitone (10 mg/kg) from saline (AND discrimination, n = 8) or to discriminate the same mixture from its component drugs alone (AND-OR discrimination, n = 9). The studies used two-lever operant procedures with a tandem variable interval 1-min fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. There was partial generalization to nicotine and midazolam and no generalization to cocaine, caffeine, or ethanol under AND-discrimination conditions and no generalization to any of these drugs in the AND-OR discrimination. Nicotine or midazolam coadministered with the training doses of pentobarbitone and amphetamine, respectively, produced full generalization in the AND discrimination and partial generalization under AND-OR conditions. Cocaine coadministered with pentobarbitone generalized fully under both procedures, but at larger doses in the AND-OR than in the AND discrimination. Mixtures of either nicotine plus midazolam or caffeine plus ethanol produced very marked generalization under AND-discrimination conditions, but were without significant effect in the AND-OR procedure. The results consistently supported the hypothesis that the AND-OR discrimination procedure increases the specificity of discriminations based on drug mixtures.     

Discrimination of agonist-antagonist mixtures: experiments with nicotine plus mecamylamine

Discrimination of a mixture of an agonist plus an antagonist has been analysed by training rats to discriminate (-)-nicotine (0.32mg/kg s.c.) from saline; in different groups of rats (n = 8), nicotine was administered either alone or in combination with the non-competitive nicotine antagonist mecamylamine (0.1-0.8mg/kg s.c.). Rats were trained in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure with a tandem schedule of food reinforcement. After 50 sessions, rats trained with nicotine alone had acquired the discrimination with an accuracy of about 85%. In combination, mecamylamine blocked accuracy during acquisition in a dose-related manner. In generalization tests, rats trained with nicotine alone yielded a typical dose-response curve for nicotine (ED(50) = 0.082mg/kg), without depression of response rate. In rats trained with nicotine plus 0.2mg/kg of mecamylamine, the ED(50) for the discriminative effect of nicotine was lowered (ED(50) = 0.036mg/kg), again without depression of response rate. In rats trained with nicotine plus 0.4-0.8mg/kg of mecamylamine, nicotine did not acquire stimulus control over behaviour (flat dose-response relationships), but in these animals, nicotine had a pronounced response rate-decreasing effect. These characteristics of discriminations based on nicotine plus mecamylamine differed substantially from those of previously described discriminations of nicotine plus midazolam, supporting the hypothesis that interactions between the latter drugs were based on a behavioural mechanism (overshadowing) rather than on interactions at the level of receptors.     

AND and AND-OR drug mixture discriminations in rats: generalization to single drugs and drug mixtures

Rationale: Studies of the discriminative stimulus effects of drug mixtures provide an approach to polydrug abuse and studies on single drugs with multiple effects. Objective: This study was designed to investigate whether the use of the AND-OR procedure increases the specificity of drug mixture discriminations. Methods: Rats were trained to discriminate a mixture of amphetamine (0.4 mg/kg) plus pentobarbitone (10 mg/kg) from saline (AND-discrimination, n = 8) or to discriminate the same mixture from its component drugs alone (AND–OR discrimination, n = 9). The studies used two-lever operant procedures with a tandem variable interval 1-min fixed ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. Results: Under AND-discrimination conditions, there was partial generalization to nicotine and midazolam when each drug was administered singly, and there was no generalization to cocaine, caffeine or ethanol. With the AND-OR discrimination, there was no generalization to any of the preceding drugs administered singly. In “single substitution” tests, nicotine or midazolam was co-administered with the training doses of pentobarbitone and amphetamine, respectively; there was full generalization in the AND-discrimination and partial generalization under AND-OR conditions. Cocaine co-administered with pentobarbitone generalized fully under both procedures, but the dose of cocaine needed was much larger in the AND-OR than in the AND-discrimination. In “dual substitution” tests, mixtures of two novel substances were tested. Mixtures of either nicotine plus midazolam or caffeine plus ethanol produced very marked generalization under AND-discrimination conditions, but were without significant effect in the AND-OR procedure. Throughout the studies, in every instance where comparisons were made, generalization was greater or occurred at lower doses under AND- than under the AND-OR discrimination. Conclusions: The study yielded extensive evidence supporting the hypothesis that the AND-OR discrimination procedure increases the specificity of discriminations based on drug mixtures. Received: 6 May 1998/Final version: 4 October 1998     

Antagonism of a nicotine plus midazolam discriminative cue in rats

Rats were trained to discriminate nicotine (0.4mg/kg s.c.), midazolam (0.2mg/kg s.c.) or the combination of these drugs from saline (n = 10). The rats were trained to 95% accuracy in a two-bar operant procedure with a tandem schedule of food reinforcement. Testing with the individual drugs in the mixture-trained group showed that nicotine (85% drug-appropriate responding) was a more salient component than midazolam (47%) in the compound stimulus. The rats were tested with benzodiazepine and nicotine antagonists individually and in combination (mecamylamine 0.2-1.6mg/kg s.c.; flumazenil 2.5-20mg/kg i.p.). Results for the mixture-trained animals showed that flumazenil had no effect on its own, however mecamylamine on its own produced a significant but incomplete block in doses of 0.4-1.6mg/kg. The greater salience of the nicotine component of the cue would explain the block by mecamylamine but not flumazenil. The antagonists in combination produced greater blockade than mecamylamine on its own. The selectivity of the antagonist actions on the different cue components was also demonstrated. The results suggest that in drug discrimination experiments, "false negative" results may be obtained with antagonists when a training drug produces a stimulus with more than one component.     

Drug mixtures and ethanol as compound internal stimuli.

Drug discrimination methods that entail training with mixtures of drugs may shed light on polydrug abuse and on the actions of single drugs that interact with more than one receptor. In AND-discrimination procedures (drug A + drug B vs. vehicle), mixtures are discriminated primarily on the basis of their component drugs: these discriminations may be useful for testing interactions between component drugs in mixtures. The role of training dose, overshadowing and associative blocking in AND-discriminations have been investigated. For example, after prior training with midazolam, it was possible to demonstrate associative blocking of the nicotine element of the mixture stimulus, and vice versa. Using the AND-OR discriminations (drug A + drug B vs. drug A or drug B) increased pharmacological specificity considerably, and these procedures may be valuable for determining whether the effects of a novel mixture are similar to the combined effects of the training drugs. Ethanol is an example of a single drug that may produce a compound cue; rats trained to discriminate ethanol from water generalize (asymmetrically) to GABA(A) enhancers such as chlordiazepoxide (CDP) or pentobarbitone, to NMDA antagonists such as dizocilpine (MK-801), and to some serotonin agonists, such as trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine (5-HT(1B/2C)). In addition, rats trained to discriminate mixtures of either CDP or pentobarbitone plus MK-801 generalize to ethanol. A previous history of training with MK-801 or CDP (prior to ethanol discrimination training) enhanced the MK-801-like and CDP-like effects of ethanol respectively, but associative blocking of proposed elements in the ethanol stimulus was not seen. These studies provide some support for the multielement concept of ethanol discrimination but also suggest that rules governing three-component stimuli (such as those putatively produced by ethanol) may differ from those for the two-component mixtures of drugs studied previously.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of a nicotine-midazolam mixture in rats

Rats were trained to discriminate the effects of nicotine (0.4 mg/kg SC) plus midazolam (0.2 mg/kg SC) from those of saline in a two-bar operant conditioning procedure involving a tandem schedule of food reinforcement. After discrimination training, the component drugs of the mixture produced very considerable amounts of drug-appropriate responding when given separately. Mecamylamine and Ro 15-1788 only slightly attenuated the discriminative response to the mixture when given separately, but completely blocked the response when administered together. In different groups of rats trained to discriminate nicotine or midazolam separately from saline, neither drug appreciably altered the dose-response curve for the other, suggesting a minimal role for pharmacological interactions when effects of mixtures were assessed. The results suggest that the two components of a compound drug-produced stimulus can be perceived separately rather than being blended into a homogenous entity. Knowledge of the characteristics of compound drug-produced stimuli may aid interpretation of the discriminative effects of single drugs with wide spectra of action.     

Reversal of overshadowing in a drug mixture discrimination in rats

Previous studies have suggested that in some circumstances, learning processes such as overshadowing may determine the effects that one drug has upon the response to another. The experiments described here examined overshadowing in rats trained to discriminate mixtures of nicotine plus midazolam in two-lever operant procedures with food reinforcement. After training for 60 sessions, midazolam (0.32 mg/kg SC) overshadowed nicotine (0.32 mg/kg SC) so that the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine seen in control rats trained with nicotine alone was abolished (n=8–10). In the next phase of the study, the discriminative response to midazolam in one group of mixture-trained rats was devalued by means of an extinction procedure which weakened the relationship between administration of midazolam and the response that was reinforced. Dose-response determinations then showed that the devaluation procedure had indeed attenuated the response to midazolam, whereas the previously overshadowed response to nicotine was restored. Post-session injections of drugs were used to equate the pharmacological histories of the groups and the effects seen were therefore attributable to training with the drugs and not simply to repeated exposure to them. Additionally, in the control rats trained with nicotine only (with midazolam given post-session), midazolam markedly reduced response rates, whereas in the three groups of rats trained with the mixture, midazolam had little response rate-depressant effect; this observation suggests that behaviourally contingent tolerance had developed to the response rate-reducing effect of midazolam. Application of devaluation procedures in studies of the discriminative stimulus effects of single drugs with multiple effects may provide a means for manipulating the characteristics of the discriminations obtained and for identifying individual elements of the drug-produced stimulus complex.     

Impact of training history on discrimination of a drug mixture by rats

The impact of training sequence on discrimination of a mixture of two drugs was investigated with five groups of rats (n = 10). In phase I, two groups were trained according to conventional two-lever, operant drug discrimination protocols with food reinforcement; one of these groups was trained with nicotine (0.4mg/kg) and the other group was trained with midazolam (0.15mg/kg). The three remaining groups served as controls and were subjected to 'sham' training in which administrations of saline, nicotine or midazolam were unrelated to contingencies of reinforcement. After completion of phase I (40 sessions), all five groups were trained to discriminate a mixture of nicotine (0.4mg/kg) plus midazolam (0.15mg/kg) from saline (phase II). Any differences between the groups in their performance during phase II could, therefore, be attributed to their different histories in phase I. During phase II, all groups discriminated the mixture from saline with similar accuracy (89-94% drug-appropriate responding after mixture as compared with 2-7% after saline). In the three groups of rats subjected to 'sham' training in phase I, there was partial generalization to both nicotine (45-53%) and midazolam (39-40%), each of which therefore contributed about equally to stimulus control by the mixture. In rats that were initially trained to discriminate nicotine, midazolam had acquired little stimulus control over behaviour (9%) and discrimination of the mixture was attributable largely to the nicotine (87%). Conversely, in rats that were initially trained to discriminate midazolam, nicotine contributed 3% and midazolam 76% to stimulus control by the mixture. These powerful, persistent effects of training sequence were interpreted as examples of associative blocking demonstrated with the interoceptive stimuli produced by psychoactive drugs.     

Overshadowing of nicotine discrimination in rats: a model for behavioural mechanisms of drug interactions?

Overshadowing can play an important role in conditioning with compound exteroceptive stimuli. Drug discrimination experiments have been carried out to examine overshadowing when mixtures of drugs serve as compound interoceptive stimuli. Three groups of rats were trained in a two-bar operant procedure with a tandem schedule of food reinforcement (n = 8). All rats were trained to discriminate (-)-nicotine (0.32mg/kg s.c.) from saline, but in two groups of animals midazolam (0.1 or 0.2mg/kg s.c.) was co-administered with the nicotine to generate a compound stimulus. Dose-response curves were determined with nicotine and midazolam in each group. In rats trained with nicotine alone, there was a steep dose-response curve for the discriminative stimulus effect of nicotine. The presence of the smaller dose of midazolam in the training stimulus clearly attenuated, and the larger dose prevented, the appearance of the discriminative effect of nicotine, whereas there was a concomitant increase in the discriminative response to midazolam. These results suggest that midazolam overshadowed the response to nicotine in a dose-related manner. In rats trained with nicotine alone, the same doses of midazolam had no effect on the discriminative response established to the nicotine stimulus, indicating the absence of pharmacological antagonism. The results illustrate how conditioning factors may provide a behavioural mechanism for interactions between abused drugs.     

Drug discrimination analysis of NMDA receptor channel blockers as nicotinic receptor antagonists in rats

Rationale Antagonists acting at the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of glutamate receptors inhibit various phenomena associated with exposures to nicotine (e.g., tolerance, sensitization, dependence, and intravenous self-administration). These effects are often discussed in terms of nicotine-induced glutamate release with subsequent glutamate-dependent stimulation of dopamine metabolism and neuronal plasticity in brain areas critically involved in drug-addiction mechanisms. However, it is also well established that certain types of NMDA receptor antagonists (channel blockers) potently bind to nicotinic receptors and may act as nicotinic receptor antagonists.Objective The present study aimed to evaluate the discriminative-stimulus effects of the NMDA receptor channel blockers (+)MK-801, dextromethorphan, and memantine in rats trained to discriminate nicotine from its vehicle.Methods Adult male Wistar rats were trained to discriminate 0.6 mg/kg nicotine from saline under a two-lever, fixed-ratio 10 schedule of food reinforcement. During test sessions, injections of (+)MK-801 (0.03–0.3 mg/kg, i.p.), dextromethorphan (30 mg/kg, s.c.), or memantine (1–10 mg/kg, i.p.) were co-administered with s.c. nicotine (0.075–0.6 mg/kg; interaction tests) or saline (generalization tests). Additional interaction and generalization tests were conducted with the selective nicotinic receptor antagonists mecamylamine (0.1–3 mg/kg, s.c.) and MRZ 2/621 (0.3–10 mg/kg, i.p.), and the mGlu5 receptor antagonist MPEP (3–10 mg/kg, i.p.).Results In generalization tests, none of the compounds produced any appreciable levels of substitution for nicotine. The nicotine discriminative-stimulus control was dose dependently attenuated by mecamylamine (ED₅₀=0.67 mg/kg) and MRZ 2/621 (ED₅₀=9.7 mg/kg). Both agents produced a marked downward shift in the nicotine dose–response curve. Memantine and MPEP slightly attenuated nicotine discriminative-stimulus effects, while (+)MK-801 and dextromethorphan did not affect the nicotine-appropriate responding.Conclusions NMDA receptor channel blockers, such as (+)MK-801, dextromethorphan, and memantine, have minimal interactions with the discriminative-stimulus effects of nicotine.     

Effects of the competitive nicotinic antagonist erysodine on behavior occasioned or maintained by nicotine: comparison with mecamylamine

Rationale: The cellular effects of nicotine underlying its addictive liability are thought to be mediated by neuronal nicotinic receptors (nACHRs) in the central nervous system. It is believed that densely expressed β2-containing nACHRs in the central nervous system are responsible for these actions, but few data are available that can directly assess subtype mediation of nicotine’s acute subjective and reinforcing effects. Objective: The present study compared the effects of the competitive nACHR antagonist erysodine and the noncompetitive antagonist mecamylamine in rats trained to discriminate or self-administer nicotine. Methods: Adult male rats were trained to disciminate 0.4-mg/kg injections of nicotine from vehicle in a two-lever procedure of food-maintained behavior, or to self-administer 0.03-mg/kg injections of nicotine under fixed-ratio 5 or progressive-ratio schedules of reinforcement. Additional rats were trained under a food-maintained procedure of lever pressing. Results: Erysodine (0.3–10 mg/kg) and mecamylamine (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) blocked nicotine discrimination, although only erysodine produced the rightward shift that would be predicted of a competitive antagonist. Erysodine (0.32–32 mg/kg) and mecamylamine (0.32–3.2 mg/kg) also selectively reduced nicotine self-administration on a fixed-ratio schedule and lowered break points on a progressive-ratio schedule. Conclusions: Based on the known affinity of erysodine for α4β2 nACHRs and its selectivity relative to α7 and α1β1γδ receptors, the present data support a critical role of β2-containing nACHR constructs in the discriminative and reinforcing actions of nicotine. Received: 20 March 1999 / Final version: 22 September 1999     

Nicotine trace discrimination in rats with midazolam as a mediating stimulus

It was shown previously that effects of drugs present prior to training sessions could serve as discriminative stimuli. Further experiments have aimed to determine whether a second drug can serve as a mediating stimulus that increases the strength of stimulus control by such pre-session drug effects. Rats were trained in a two-lever discrimination procedure with food reinforcers presented on a tandem variable-interval fixed-ratio (VI-FR) schedule. Injections of nicotine (0.6 mg/kg) or saline were followed after 5 min by administration of midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) as a putative mediating stimulus. The nicotine antagonist mecamylamine (1.0 mg/kg) was administered 5 min after midazolam, to block effects of nicotine during training sessions, as in previous work on pre-session drug effects. Stimulus control was acquired slowly and to an accuracy of only 75%. Midazolam did not facilitate the acquisition or magnitude of nicotine-induced stimulus control. However, extinction tests showed that the presence of midazolam was required for expression of stimulus control by pre-session effects of the training dose of nicotine. The response to nicotine (0.075-0.6 mg/kg) was dose-related, but the dose-response relationship was not dependent upon the presence of midazolam. In a group of rats trained with nicotine and midazolam as above, but without mecamylamine, stimulus control by nicotine was not dependent upon the presence of midazolam. In all cases, overall rates of responding were very low when tests were carried out without midazolam, suggesting the presence of state-dependent learning. The results imply that under appropriate conditions the discriminative stimulus effects of one drug (nicotine) can be mediated by the action of a second substance (midazolam). This finding can be conceptualized in terms of occasion setting, with nicotine serving as the feature and midazolam as the target stimulus. Furthermore, it appears that even when rates of responding show drug-state dependence, this is not necessarily the case for discriminative stimulus effects.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of the nicotinic agonist cytisine

Cytisine binds with high affinity and specificity to neuronal nicotinic receptors but its physiological and behavioural effects are complex and differ from those of nicotine. The present study explores the behavioural aspects further by comparing the discriminative stimulus effects of cytisine with those of nicotine. Two groups of rats were trained to discriminate cytisine (2 mg/kg SC) or nicotine (0.2 mg/kg SC) from saline in a two-lever operant conditioning procedure with food reinforcers presented on a tandem VI FR schedule. A third group of rats was trained to discriminate cytisine (3 mg/kg SC). Rats acquired these discriminations within 50 training sessions. The stimulus effects of both cytisine and nicotine appeared within 4 min of SC injection. In generalization tests, rats trained with either cytisine or nicotine showed steep dose-response curves (generalization gradients) for their respective training drug. However, rats trained with cytisine showed full dose-related, generalization to nicotine (93%), whereas rats trained with nicotine exhibited only partial generalization to cytisine (54%). Rats trained with either cytisine or nicotine exhibited similar, partial generalization (76–77%) to (+)-amphetamine. The nicotine antagonist mecamylamine blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of both cytisine and nicotine; it was confirmed that the block of nicotine (0.2 mg/kg) was complete, whereas the block of cytisine (2 and 3 mg/kg) was incomplete in two separate experiments. Overall, the results showed that cytisine, like nicotine, can serve as a robust discriminative stimulus but, in contrast to its relatively high affinity in binding experiments, cytisine was much less potent than nicotine in the behavioural studies. Although the stimulus effects of the two drugs were very similar, there were some subtle differences such as the asymmetrical cross-generalizations between them and possible small differences in susceptibility to antagonism by mecamyl-amine. These effects were interpreted either in terms of a putative partial agonist effect of cytisine, or by assuming that nicotine produces a compound stimulus. Such a stimulus would be mediated through two or more subtypes of nicotinic receptor, and cytisine would act at some, but not all, of these receptor subtypes. Received: 17 June 1996/Final version: 6 September 1996     

Tolerance and sensitization to stimulant and depressant effects of nicotine in intracranial self-stimulation in the rat

Nicotine is thought to be an important factor in addiction to tobacco but its psychopharmacological properties are still uncertain. In the present study, rats were trained to operate a pedal to obtain threshold-current, variable-interval hypothalmic stimulation. Response rates were printed out at 10min intervals to provide a continuous record of facilitatory or depressant effects by injected nicotine. Responding was enhanced in all rats but this depended on dose, time after injection, and previous exposure to the drug. In the first 10min after injection, responding by drug-naive rats was either unaffected (40-130mg/kg s.c., as base) or strongly depressed (400μg/kg). This phase was followed by prolonged (>50min) dose-dependent facilitation. Higher doses (1.3mg/kg) caused prostration. Chronic exposure to nicotine (400μg/kg x 10 at 2-5 day intervals) reduced the initial depressant effect; it also augmented subsequent responding, but only in the early minutes after injection; the latter finding indicates that apparent sensitization to chronic nicotine may depend primarily on tolerance to its depressant effects, rather than on receptor upregulation. Stimulant and depressant effects of nicotine were prevented by pretreatment with the centrally acting antagonist, mecamylamine (2.0mg/kg s.c.), but not by the peripheral antagonist, hexamethonium (1.0mg/kg s.c.) or by the muscarinic receptor antagonist, hyoscine (scopolamine; 100-300μg/kg s.c.). Self-stimulation was unaffected by mecamylamine alone. Thus the inhibitory action of nicotine is unlikely to be due to depolarization block, peripheral activity or muscarinic activity. Its facilitatory and depressant effects appear to be narrowly time- and dose-specific, thus accounting for divergent findings in many studies.     

Effects of the serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor ligands on the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats

The present study tested the hypothesis that serotonergic (5-HT) 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors or their pharmacological stimulation modulated the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in male Wistar rats. To this end the selective 5-HT2A receptor antagonist R-(+)-alpha-(2,3-dimethoxyphenyl)-1-[2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethyl]-4-piperidinemethanol (M100,907; 0.5-1 mg/kg, i.p.), the functional 5-HT2A receptor agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI; 0.1-1 mg/kg, s.c.), the selective 5-HT2C receptor antagonist 6-chloro-5-methyl-1-{[2-(2-methylpyrid-3-yloxy)pyrid-5-yl]carbamoyl}indoline (SB 242,084; 0.25-1 mg/kg, i.p.) and the 5-HT2C receptor agonists (S)-2-chloro-5-fluoro-indol-1-yl)-1-methylethylamine fumarate (Ro 60-0175; 0.3-1 mg/kg, s.c.) and (7bR, 10aR)-1,2,3,4,8,9,10,10a-octahydro-7bH-cyclopenta-[b][1,4]diazepino[6,7,1hi]indole (WAY 163,909; 0.75-1.5 mg/kg, i.p.) were used. Additionally, the effects of the selective alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtype agonist 5-iodo-3-(2(S)-azetidinylmethoxy)pyridine (5-IA; 0.01 mg/kg, s.c.) were investigated. In rats trained to discriminate (-)-nicotine (0.4 mg/kg, s.c.) from saline in a two-lever, water-reinforced fixed ratio 10 task, substitutions were not observed with 5-HT2 receptor ligands (<32% nicotine-lever responding), conversely 5-IA induced a full substitution (100% nicotine-lever responding). In combination studies, fixed doses of M100,907 (0.5-1 mg/kg) or SB 242,084 (0.25-1 mg/kg) did not alter the dose-response curve of nicotine, while DOI (0.3 mg/kg), Ro 60-0175 (1 mg/kg) and WAY 163,909 (1 and 1.5 mg/kg) attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine. The decrease in the expression of the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine produced by DOI was blocked by M100,907 (1 mg/kg), but not by SB 242,084 (1 mg/kg), while that evoked by Ro 60-0175 or WAY 163,909 was blocked by SB 242,084 (1 mg/kg), but not by M100,907 (1 mg/kg). Further studies showed that DOI (0.3 mg/kg) and Ro 60-0175 (1 mg/kg), but not WAY 163,909 (1.5 mg/kg) blocked full substitution of 5-IA (0.01 mg/kg) for nicotine. Our pharmacological analyses indicate that tonic activation of 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors is not required for subjective effects of nicotine, however these receptors appear to have inhibitory influence on nicotine cue, since pharmacological stimulation of either receptor attenuates the discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine.     

Mecamylamine attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior in rats.

Mecamylamine, a noncompetitive nicotinic cholinergic antagonist, inhibits nicotine self-administration in animals and may attenuate tobacco smoking in humans trying to quit. Our preliminary data suggested that this agent, at a dose of 2 mg/kg (subcutaneous (s.c.)), also attenuates cue-induced relapse to nicotine-seeking behavior in rats. This study determined whether mecamylamine-induced attenuation can be obtained at doses lower than the high 2 mg/kg dose used in the first study, and whether it is specific to nicotine-associated cues. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to intravenously self-administer nicotine (0.03 mg/kg/infusion) on a fixed-ratio 5 schedule. Each infusion was accompanied by a visual cue (1 s onset of a lever light followed by offset of a house light for 20 s during which time no infusions could be obtained). After the nicotine-maintained responding was extinguished by withholding the delivery of nicotine (saline substitution) and its associated cue, reinstatement tests were conducted. Response-contingent re-presentation of the cue without further availability of nicotine significantly reinstated extinguished responding at the previously nicotine-reinforced lever. Pretreatment with mecamylamine (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently attenuated the cue-induced reinstatement of lever responding. Mecamylamine did not change food-taking and -seeking responses, whereas the highest dose (2 mg/kg) decreased nicotine self-administration behavior. The results confirm previous findings that stimuli conditioned to nicotine self-administration effectively elicit reinstatement of nicotine-seeking behavior after extinction and demonstrate that mecamylamine, besides suppressing self-administration of nicotine, effectively attenuates cue-induced nicotine-seeking behavior. These findings suggest that the response-reinstatement procedures used in this study may be useful for studying neurobiological mechanisms of nicotine-seeking behavior and that mecamylamine-like drugs may be potential candidates for pharmacological treatment and prevention of relapse to tobacco smoking in abstinent smokers.     

Caffeine, nicotine and mecamylamine share stimulus properties in the preexposure conditioned taste aversion procedure

RATIONALE: The present study examined whether nicotine and caffeine, two of the most widely used psychoactive drugs, share stimulus properties in the preexposure conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether nicotine would attenuate the formation of a caffeine-induced CTA and further assess whether pretreatment with mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, would reverse nicotine's attenuating effect of a caffeine-induced CTA. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were preexposed with one of three doses of nicotine (0.6, 1.2 and 2.0 mg/kg, s.c.) for three consecutive days, then 24 h following the final preexposure injection were conditioned with caffeine (20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) in a standard two-bottle test. There were four conditioning trials and four drug-free test days. In a follow-up study, rats were pretreated with mecamylamine (2 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to preexposure injections with nicotine (0.6 mg/kg, i.p.), then subsequently conditioned with caffeine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) as described above. RESULTS: The lowest nicotine dose (0.6 mg/kg) attenuated the caffeine induced CTAs (20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg) but the higher nicotine doses showed no such attenuating effect. In addition, mecamylamine reversed the nicotine-induced attenuation of the caffeine-induced CTA and also directly attenuated it. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that caffeine, nicotine and mecamylamine share overlapping stimulus properties and that the nature of this relationship may involve action at the nicotinic-cholinergic receptor.     

Role of the cholinergic system in the rat basolateral amygdala on morphine-induced conditioned place preference

The effects of intra-basolateral amygdala (intra-BLA) injections of physostigmine, atropine, nicotine and/or mecamylamine on morphine-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in rats was investigated by using an unbiased 3-day schedule of place conditioning design. Animals that received 3 daily injections of morphine (0.5-10 mg/kg) subcutaneously (s.c.) or saline (1.0 ml/kg, s.c.) showed a significant preference for compartment paired with morphine. The maximum response was observed with 7.5 mg/kg of the opioid. Administration of the anticholinesterase drug, physostigmine (1, 3 and 5 microg/rat) with an ineffective dose of morphine (0.5 mg/kg) elicited a significant CPP. Injections of antimuscarinic receptor agent, atropine (1, 4 and 7 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. The injections of nicotine (0.75, 1 and 2 microg/rat) potentiated the morphine (0.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference, while the nicotinic receptor antagonist, mecamylamine (1, 3 and 6 microg/rat) dose-dependently inhibited the morphine (7.5 mg/kg)-induced place preference. Furthermore, administration of atropine (7 microg/rat) but not mecamylamine (6 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by different doses of physostigmine plus morphine. Moreover, mecamylamine (6 microg/rat) but not atropine (7 microg/rat) reduced the response induced by different doses of nicotine plus morphine. It is concluded that the muscarinic and nicotinic receptor mechanisms in the BLA may be involved in the acquisition of morphine-induced place preference.     

Nicotine attenuates place aversion induced by naloxone in single-dose,morphine-treated rats

Rationale Acute physical dependence refers to the withdrawal syndrome precipitated by an opioid antagonist administered several hours after either a single dose or a short-term infusion of an opioid agonist.Objectives We examined the mechanism of nicotine-induced attenuation of naloxone-precipitated withdrawal syndrome when used to produce an aversive motivational state in a place-conditioning paradigm.Methods The effect of nicotine was investigated through place aversion induced by naloxone in morphine-pretreated rats. Additionally, the mechanism of nicotine action in this model was explored specifically in relation to the dopaminergic system through the use of dopamine receptor antagonist and agonist.Results Place avoidance behavior was potently elicited by naloxone (0.5 mg/kg s.c.) 24 h after a single exposure to morphine (10 mg/kg s.c.). Avoidance behavior was attenuated by pretreatment with a 0.2-mg/kg dose of nicotine 15 min prior to naloxone administration. The effect of nicotine was completely blocked by mecamylamine, but not hexamethonium. The dopamine receptor antagonists haloperidol (0.05, 0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), SCH23390 (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), raclopride (1.0 mg/kg, s.c.) and eticlopride (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.) showed effects similar to mecamylamine. Additionally, the dopamine receptor agonist apomorphine (0.03, 0.1, 0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) inhibited naloxone-induced place aversion in morphine-treated rats.Conclusion The inhibitory effect of nicotine on place aversion induced by naloxone-precipitated morphine withdrawal may involve a dopaminergic portion of the central nervous system.