Admission high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein levels improve the Grace risk score prediction on in‐hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction patients

BackgroundAcute myocardial infarction (AMI) is the main cause of death and disability in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Both the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (Grace) score and high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) were associated with prognosis in patients with AMI. However, whether the addition of the hs‐CRP to Grace risk score could improve the predictive power of Grace risk score on the prognosis of patients with AMI is unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the inclusion of hs‐CRP in the Grace risk score could improve the ability to correctly distinguish the occurrence of in‐hospital outcomes.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 1804 patients with AMI in the final analysis. Patients were divided into four groups by hs‐CRP quartiles. The relation between hs‐CRP and Grace risk score was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation. Logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors. The predictive value of hs‐CRP add to Grace risk score was evaluated by C‐statistic, net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated differentiation improvement (IDI), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis.ResultsThe hs‐CRP and Grace risk score had a significantly positive correlation (r = .191, p < .001). hs‐CRP combined with Grace risk score could improve the ability of Grace risk score alone to correctly redistinguish the occurrence of in‐hospital outcome (C‐statistic = 0.819, p < .001; NRI = 0.05956, p = .007; IDI = 0.0757, p < .001).ConclusionAdmission hs‐CRP level was a significant independent risk factor for in‐hospital outcomes in patients with AMI. The inclusion of hs‐CRP in the Grace risk score could improve the ability to correctly distinguish the occurrence of in‐hospital outcomes.     

Comparison of coronary atherosclerotic disease burden between ST‐elevation myocardial infarction and non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: Non‐culprit Gensini score and non‐culprit SYNTAX score

BackgroundPatients with non‐ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have worse long‐term prognoses than those with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).HypothesisIt may be attributable to more extended coronary atherosclerotic disease burden in patients with NSTEMI.MethodsThis study consisted of consecutive 231 patients who underwent coronary intervention for myocardial infarction (MI). To assess the extent and severity of atherosclerotic disease burden of non‐culprit coronary arteries, two scoring systems (Gensini score and synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with Taxus and cardiac surgery [SYNTAX] score) were modified by subtracting the score of the culprit lesion: the non‐culprit Gensini score and the non‐culprit SYNTAX score.ResultsPatients with NSTEMI had more multi‐vessel disease, initial thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade 2/3, and final TIMI flow grade 3 than those with STEMI. As compared to STEMI, patients with NSTEMI had significantly higher non‐culprit Gensini score (16.3 ± 19.8 vs. 31.2 ± 25.4, p < 0.001) and non‐culprit SYNTAX score (5.8 ± 7.0 vs. 11.1 ± 9.7, p < 0.001).ConclusionsPatients with NSTEMI had more advanced coronary atherosclerotic disease burden including non‐obstruction lesions, which may at least in part explain higher incidence of cardiovascular events in these patients.     

Development of an optimized risk score to predict short‐term death among acute myocardial infarction patients in rural China

BackgroundRisk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is of great clinical significance.HypothesisThe present study aimed to establish an optimized risk score to predict short‐term (6‐month) death among rural AMI patients from China.MethodsWe enrolled 6581 AMI patients and extracted relevant data. Patients were divided chronologically into a derivation cohort (n = 5539), to establish the multivariable risk prediction model, and a validation cohort (n = 1042), to validate the risk score.ResultsSix variables were identified as independent predictors of short‐term death and were used to establish the risk score: age, Killip class, blood glucose, creatinine, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and percutaneous coronary intervention treatment. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the optimized risk score was 0.82 within the derivation cohort and 0.81 within the validation cohort. The diagnostic performance of the optimized risk score was superior to that of the GRACE risk score (AUC 0.76 and 0.75 in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively; p < .05).ConclusionThese results indicate that the optimized scoring method developed here is a simple and valuable instrument to accurately predict the risk of short‐term mortality in rural patients with AMI.     

Pharmacological treatment of high‐normal blood pressure (prehypertension) in high‐risk patients for primary prevention of cardiovascular events

Currently, the best treatment strategy for patients with a high‐normal blood pressure (prehypertension) is not known. The authors aimed to determine whether pharmacological reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) to a normal level (<120 mm Hg) would prevent cardiac morbidity and mortality in prehypertensive patients. In this secondary analysis, the authors obtained the data from SPRINT from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute data repository center. Among 9361 patients enrolled in SPRINT, 289 high‐risk (ASCVD risk = 24.8% ± 13.0 [10‐65]) prehypertensive patients without previous cardiovascular disease and not receiving any antihypertensive medications were enrolled. One hundred and forty‐eight of them were assigned to standard treatment which consisted of clinical follow‐up till SBP goes above 140 mm Hg and then staring medications to keep SBP <140 mm Hg. One hundred and forty‐one were assigned to the intensive treatment receiving pharmacological SBP reduction to <120 mm Hg upon enrollment. The primary composite outcome was myocardial infarction, and other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Throughout the 3.06 years of follow‐up, a primary outcome event was confirmed in three participants (0.74% per year) in the intensive‐treatment group and 8 (1.61% per year) in the standard‐treatment group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P = .045). Rates of serious adverse events were not increased by intensive‐treatment (HR, 0.83; P = .506). Based on this secondary post hoc analysis, intensive SBP reduction may probably be beneficial for primary prevention of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high‐risk prehypertensive patients. This finding needs to be evaluated in a larger trial designed specifically to answer this question.     

Immediate and early percutaneous coronary intervention in very high‐risk and high‐risk non‐ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients

BackgroundThe European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST‐segment elevation (non‐ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI]) has recommended immediate (<2 h) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in very‐high risk patients and early (<24 h) PCI in high‐risk patients.HypothesisTo examine the ESC NSTEMI guidelines adherence in a nationwide survey in Israel using the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS). We hypothesized that adherence to the guidlines'' recommnded PCI timing in NSTEMI pateints will be inadequate, partly due to the inconsistent evidence regarding its effect on clinical outcomes.MethodsAll NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI during the ACSIS surveys in 2016 and 2018 were included in the analysis.ResultsOut of 1793 NSTEMI patients, 1643 (92%) patients underwent PCI, and door to balloon time was documented in 1078 of them. One hundred and fifty‐six (14.5%) patients and 922 (85.5%) patients were defined as very high‐risk and high‐risk NSTEMI patients, respectively. Of the very high‐risk NSTEMI patients, only 10 (6.4%) underwent immediate coronary angiography, and 50 (32.1%) underwent early coronary angiography. Acute heart failure 139 (89.1%) was the main reason for including NSTEMI patients in the very high‐risk category. Of the high‐risk patients, early coronary angiography was performed in only 405 (43.9%) patients. Patients in whom coronary angiography was postponed were older and had more comorbidities.ConclusionsDespite guidelines recommendations for immediate and early PCI in very high‐risk and high‐risk NSTEMI patients, respectively, most patients do not undergo immediate or early PCI according to contemporary guidelines. Further studies are needed to better understand the reasons for guidelines'' nonadherence in those high‐risk patients.     

Anxiety and prognosis of patients with myocardial infarction: A meta‐analysis

Although anxiety is highly prevalent after myocardial infarction (MI), but the association between anxiety and MI is not well established. This study aimed to provide an updated and comprehensive evaluation of the association between anxiety and short‐term and long‐term prognoses in patients with MI. Anxiety is associated with poor short‐term and long‐term prognoses in patients with MI. We performed a systematic search in the PubMed and Cochrane databases (January 2000–October 2020). The study endpoints were complications, all‐cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and/or major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Pooled data were synthesized using Stata SE12.0 and expressed as risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 9373 patients with MI from 16 published studies. Pooled analyses indicated a correlation between high anxiety and poor clinical outcomes (RR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.13–1.26, p < .001), poor short‐term complications (RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.09–1.38, p = .001), and poor long‐term prognosis (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.13–1.44, p < .001). Anxiety was also specifically associated with long‐term mortality (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.01–1.33, p = .033) and long‐term MACEs (RR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.26–1.90, p < .001). This study provided strong evidence that increased anxiety was associated with poor prognosis in patients with MI. Further analysis revealed that MI patients with anxiety had a 23% increased risk of short‐term complications and a 27% increased risk of adverse long‐term prognosis compared to those without anxiety.     

Cardiovascular event rate and death in high‐risk secondary prevention patient cohort in Finland: A registry study

BackgroundA large number of patients are living with atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease and thus are at risk of life‐threatening CV events.HypothesisThis study evaluated the risk for a recurrent CV event or death in Finnish real‐world data.MethodsPatients with an incident atherosclerotic CV event between 2012 and 2016 were included in this retrospective registry study and followed for recurrent CV events or death. The risk and risk factors of recurrent CV events or death and time from the first CV event to recurrence were assessed.ResultsA total of 48,405 patients were followed from their first CV event. The event rate was 14.34 events per 100 patient‐years. Multistate models suggested that at 5 years post index CV event, 41.5% of the patients had died or suffered a recurrent CV event. Death was the most common type of subsequent event (61.5%). After the first CV event, there were rapid increases both in recurrent CV events and deaths during the next 6 months. The subsequent CV event was usually of the same type as the first, which was of the cardiac or cerebrovascular cluster.ConclusionsThe incidence of recurrent CV events and all‐cause mortality was high in patients suffering from their first CV event, particularly during the first 6 months after the index event. Death was the most common subsequent event. The event rate accelerated after each additional CV event. This suggests that the acute treatment of the index event should be followed by prompt secondary prevention measures to achieve guideline‐recommended goals as soon as possible.     

Association of non‐invasive electrocardiographic risk factors with left ventricular systolic function in post‐myocardial infarction patients with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the PRESERVE‐EF study

BackgroundElectrocardiographic non‐invasive risk factors (NIRFs) have an important role in the arrhythmic risk stratification of post‐myocardial infarction (post‐MI) patients with preserved or mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, their specific relation to left ventricular systolic function remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between NIRFs and LVEF in the patients included in the PRESERVE‐EF trial.MethodsWe studied 575 post‐MI ischemia‐free patients with LVEF≥40% (mean age: 57.0 ± 10.4 years, 86.2% men). The following NIRFs were evaluated: premature ventricular complexes, non‐sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT), late potentials (LPs), prolonged QTc, increased T‐wave alternans, reduced heart rate variability, and abnormal deceleration capacity with abnormal turbulence.ResultsThere was a statistically significant relationship between LPs (Chi‐squared = 4.975; p < .05), nsVT (Chi‐squared = 5.749, p < .05), PVCs (r= −.136; p < .01), and the LVEF. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed that LPs (p = .001) and NSVT (p < .001) were significant predictors of the LVEF. The results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that LPs (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.02–3.05; p = .004) and NSVT (OR: 2.44; 95% CI: 1.18–5.04; p = .001) were independent predictors of the mildly reduced LVEF: 40%–49% versus the preserved LVEF: ≥50%.ConclusionLate potentials and NSVT are independently related to reduced LVEF while they are independent predictors of mildly reduced LVEF versus the preserved LVEF. These findings may have important implications for the arrhythmic risk stratification of post‐MI patients with mildly reduced or preserved LVEF.     

The value of ECG changes in risk stratification of COVID‐19 patients

BackgroundThere is growing evidence of cardiac injury in COVID‐19. Our purpose was to assess the prognostic value of serial electrocardiograms in COVID‐19 patients.MethodsWe evaluated 269 consecutive patients admitted to our center with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. ECGs available at admission and after 1 week from hospitalization were assessed. We evaluated the correlation between ECGs findings and major adverse events (MAE) as the composite of intra‐hospital all‐cause mortality or need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Abnormal ECGs were defined if primary ST‐T segment alterations, left ventricular hypertrophy, tachy or bradyarrhythmias and any new AV, bundle blocks or significant morphology alterations (e.g., new Q pathological waves) were present.ResultsAbnormal ECG at admission (106/216) and elevated baseline troponin values were more common in patients who developed MAE (p = .04 and p = .02, respectively). Concerning ECGs recorded after 7 days (159), abnormal findings were reported in 53.5% of patients and they were more frequent in those with MAE (p = .001). Among abnormal ECGs, ischemic alterations and left ventricular hypertrophy were significantly associated with a higher MAE rate. The multivariable analysis showed that the presence of abnormal ECG at 7 days of hospitalization was an independent predictor of MAE (HR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2–8.7; p = .02). Furthermore, patients with abnormal ECG at 7 days more often required transfer to the intensive care unit (p = .01) or renal replacement therapy (p = .04).ConclusionsPatients with COVID‐19 should receive ECG at admission but also during their hospital stay. Indeed, electrocardiographic alterations during hospitalization are associated with MAE and infection severity.     

血浆脑钠尿肽及TIMI危险评分对急性心肌梗死患者的预后价值

目的评估血浆脑钠尿肽（BNP）联合TIMI危险评分对急性心肌梗死（AMI）患者预后价值。方法集中检测连续收入院且随访资料齐全的63例AMI患者血浆BNP,按TIMI危险评分的多个临床资料分析记分,将患者分成不同的危险层次,分析患者BNP水平及TIMI危险评分与患者3个月随访期主要不良心血管事件发生的关系。结果15例复合心血管事件中BNP≥137 pg/ml者占11例,随着BNP水平增高,患者的主要心血管事件发生率也增多,且随着TIMI危险评分值增加而逐渐升高。结论BNP水平和TIMI危险评分越高,临床预后越差。     

The expression of myeloperoxidase in thrombi is associated with reduced heme oxygenase‐1 induction and worse left ventricular remodeling in patients with acute ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

BackgroundMyeloperoxidase (MPO) secreted by neutrophils is the enzyme that kills bacteria and other pathogens. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is usually caused by thrombosis in response to vulnerable plaque rupture. Circulating MPO was found to be associated with increased mortality in AMI patients. However, the relationship between MPO in thrombi and the prognosis of AMI patients remains unknown.HypothesisMPO expression in thrombi is associated with the prognosis of patients who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after AMI.MethodsThis study included 41 consecutive patients with acute ST‐elevation myocardial infarction, who successfully underwent primary PCI, during which we collected thrombi remaining in the culprit artery using aspiration catheters. These thrombus samples were fixed, and immunohistochemical staining against MPO and heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) was conducted. Enrolled patients were divided into two groups based on the induction of thrombotic MPO, which was quantified using Image J software.MethodsWe observed that increased MPO was associated with lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and worse LV remodeling in AMI patients. Instead, patients with decreased thrombotic MPO induction had a considerable improvement in LVEF 1 month after discharge (54.4 ± 2.0% vs. 61.1 ± 2.3%, p < 0.01). In the MPO group, a reduction in the thrombotic HO‐1 level contributed to the development of adverse LV remodeling. Logistic regression showed that MPO was a considerable risk factor for adverse LV remodeling (adjusted OR 3.70, p < 0.05).ConclusionMPO expression in thrombi is associated with reduced LVEF and deteriorated LV remodeling in AMI patients, which may be due to HO‐1 suppression in thrombi.     

Sex differences in treatment and outcomes of patients with in‐hospital ST‐elevation myocardial infarction

Background and HypothesisTwo cohorts face high mortality after ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): females and patients with in‐hospital STEMI. The aim of this study was to evaluate sex differences in ischemic times and outcomes of in‐hospital STEMI patients.MethodsConsecutive STEMI patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were prospectively recruited from 30 hospitals into the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (2013−2018). Sex discrepancies within in‐hospital STEMIs were compared with out‐of‐hospital STEMIs. The primary endpoint was 12‐month all‐cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included symptom‐to‐device (STD) time and 30‐day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). To investigate the relationship between sex and 12‐month mortality for in‐hospital versus out‐of‐hospital STEMIs, an interaction analysis was included in the multivariable models.ResultsA total of 7493 STEMI patients underwent PCI of which 494 (6.6%) occurred in‐hospital. In‐hospital versus out‐of‐hospital STEMIs comprised 31.9% and 19.9% females, respectively. Female in‐hospital STEMIs were older (69.5 vs. 65.9 years, p = .003) with longer adjusted geometric mean STD times (104.6 vs. 94.3 min, p < .001) than men. Female versus male in‐hospital STEMIs had no difference in 12‐month mortality (27.1% vs. 20.3%, p = .92) and MACE (22.8% vs. 19.3%, p = .87). Female sex was not independently associated with 12‐month mortality for in‐hospital STEMIs which was consistent across the STEMI cohort (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.94–1.70, p = .13).ConclusionsIn‐hospital STEMIs are more frequent in females relative to out‐of‐hospital STEMIs. Despite already being under medical care, females with in‐hospital STEMIs experienced a 10‐min mean excess in STD time compared with males, after adjustment for confounders. Adjusted 12‐month mortality and MACE were similar to males.     

Identifying the culprit artery via 12‐lead electrocardiogram in inferior wall ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta‐analysis

BackgroundInferior wall ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is mostly caused by acute occlusion of right coronary artery (RCA) and left circumflex artery (LCX). Several methods and algorithms using 12‐lead ECG were developed to localize the lesion in inferior wall STEMI. However, the diagnostic properties of these methods remain under‐recognized.AimsThe aim of this meta‐analysis is to compare the diagnostic properties among the methods of identifying culprit artery in inferior wall STEMI using 12‐lead ECG.MethodsWe performed a meta‐analysis to calculate the pooled sensitive, specificity, area under the curve (AUC) and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of each method.ResultsThirty‐three studies with 4414 participants were included in the analysis. Methods using double leads had better diagnostic properties, especially ST‐segment elevation (STE) in III > II [with pooled sensitivity 0.89 (0.84–0.93), specificity 0.68 (0.57–0.79), DOR 17 (9–32), AUC 0.88 (0.85–0.91)], ST‐segment depression (STD) in aVL > I [with pooled sensitivity 0.82 (0.72–0.90), specificity 0.69 (0.48–0.86), DOR 11 (4–29), AUC 0.85 (0.81–0.88)], and STD V3/STE III ≤1.2 [with pooled sensitivity 0.88 (0.78–0.95), specificity 0.59 (0.42–0.75), DOR 12 (5–27), AUC 0.82 (0.78–0.85)]. Diagnostic algorithms, including Jim score[pooled sensitivity 0.70 (0.55–0.85), specificity 0.88 (0.75–0.96)], Fiol''s algorithm [pooled sensitivity 0.54 (0.44–0.62), specificity 0.92 (0.88–0.96)] and Tierala''s algorithm [pooled sensitivity 0.60 (0.49–0.71), specificity 0.91 (0.86–0.96)], were not superior to these simple methods.ConclusionsOur meta‐analysis indicated that diagnostic methods using double leads had better properties. STE in III > II together with STD in aVL > I may be the most ideal method, for its accuracy and convenience.     

Rationale and design of the OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial: A prospective randomized multi‐center clinical trial comparing different fibrinolysis‐transfer percutaneous coronary intervention strategies in acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), the preferred reperfusion strategy for all acute ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, is not universally available in clinical practice. Pharmacoinvasive strategy has been proposed as a therapeutic option in patients with STEMI when timely PPCI is not feasible. However, pharmacoinvasive strategy has potential delay between clinical patency and complete myocardial perfusion. The optimal reperfusion strategy for STEMI patients with anticipated PPCI delay according to current practice is uncertain. OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION is an investigator‐initiated, prospective, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, superiority trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes. A total of 632 STEMI patients presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset and with an expected time of first medical contact to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ≥120 minute will be randomized to a reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy (reduced‐dose fibrinolysis combined with simultaneous transfer for immediate invasive therapy with a time interval between fibrinolysis to PCI < 3 hours) or to standard pharmacoinvasive treatment. The primary endpoint is the composite of death, reinfarction, refractory ischemia, congestive heart failure, or cardiogenic shock at 30‐days. Enrollment of the first patient is planned in March 2021. The recruitment is anticipated to last for 12 to 18 months and to complete in September 2023 with 1 year follow‐up. The OPTIMAL‐REPERFUSION trial will help determine whether reduced‐dose facilitated PCI strategy improves clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI and anticipated PPCI delay. This study is registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov ({"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT04752345","term_id":"NCT04752345"}}NCT04752345).     

Impact of regionalizing ST‐elevation myocardial infarction care on sex differences in reperfusion times and clinical outcomes

BackgroundWomen with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention historically experience worse in‐hospital outcomes compared to men.HypothesisImplementation of a regional STEMI system will reduce care gaps in reperfusion times and in‐hospital outcomes between women and men.Methods1928 patients (413 women, 21.4%) presented with an acute STEMI between June 2007 and March 2016. The population was divided into an early cohort (n = 728 patients, 2007‐May 2011), and a late cohort (n = 1200 patients, June 2011–2016). The primary endpoints evaluated were reperfusion times and in‐hospital outcomes.ResultsCompared to men, women experienced significant delays in first medical contact (FMC) to arrival at the emergency room (26.0 vs. 22.0 min, p < 0.001) and FMC‐to‐device (109 vs. 101 min p = 0.001). Women had higher incidences of post‐PCI heart failure and death compared to men (p < 0.05). Following multivariable adjustment, no mortality difference was observed for women versus men (adjusted OR; 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51–1.34; p = 0.433) or for early versus late cohorts (adjusted OR; 1.04; 95% CI, 0.68–1.60; p = 0.856).ConclusionFollowing STEMI regionalization, women continued to experience significantly longer reperfusion times, although there was no difference in adjusted mortality. These results highlight the ongoing disparity of STEMI care between women and men, and suggest that regionalization alone is insufficient to close sex‐based care gaps.     

Efficacy and safety of early initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan in patients after acute myocardial infarction: A meta‐analysis

Some randomized controlled trials have compared the effectiveness and safety outcomes between early initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan and angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Therefore, our current meta‐analysis aimed to clarify the confusion. Four Databases and relevant grey literature were searched for studies from inception to July 2, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Four studies involving 6154 patients were included to perform meta‐analysis. The results of meta‐analysis showed that the left ventricular ejection fraction in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group was higher than the ACEI group (SMD: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.19–0.55, P = .000), the incidence of major adverse cardiac events in the Sacubitril/Valsartan group was lower than the ACEI group (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.46–0.82, P = .001), while the incidences of cardiac death (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.81–1.24, P = 1.000) and the heart failure hospitalization (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.37–1.03, P = .065) showed no difference. For the incidences of myocardial infarction and the adverse side effects, there was no obvious advantage of the Sacubitril/Valsartan group over the ACEI group, because the meta‐analysis was not performed due to the limited trials. This study indicated that early initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan in patients after acute myocardial infarction was superior to ACEI in reducing the risks of major adverse cardiac events and left ventricular ejection fraction increasing. As for the other outcomes (the incidences of cardiac death, the heart failure hospitalization, the myocardial infarction and the adverse side effects), Sacubitril/Valsartan showed no obvious advantage than ACEI.     

The optimal cutoff of atrial high‐rate episodes for neurological events in patients with dual chamber permanent pacemakers

BackgroundPatients with atrial high‐rate episode (AHRE) are at higher risk of neurological events. This study aimed to identify the optimal cutoff threshold for AHRE duration in patients with dual chamber permanent pacemakers (PPM) without prior atrial fibrillation.MethodsWe included 355 consecutive patients receiving dual chamber pacemaker implantation. Primary outcome was composite endpoint of subsequent neurological events after various AHRE durations. AHRE was defined as >175 bpm (MEDTRONIC) or > 200 bpm (BIOTRONIK) for longer than 30 s. Cox regression analysis with time‐dependent covariates was conducted.ResultsThe mean age of included patients was 75.6 ± 11.3 years. Among 355 included patients, some had multiple AHREs; 125 patients (35.2%) developed AHRE ≥2 min, 107 (30.1%) had ≥5 min, 55 (15.5%) had ≥6 h, and 37 (10.4%) had ≥24 h. The mean follow‐up was 42.1 ± 31.2 months. During follow‐up, 19 neurological events occurred. After adjustment for CHA₂DS₂‐VASc score and device type, multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated AHRE ≥2 min (HR 13.605, 95% CI 3.010–61.498), and AHRE ≥5 min (HR 5.819, 95% CI 2.056–16.470) were significantly associated with neurological events. Hence, the optimal AHRE cutoff value was 2 min with the highest Youden index (sensitivity, 89.5%; specificity, 67.8%; AUC, 0.823, 95% CI, 0.763–0.884; p < 0.001).ConclusionsPatients with dual chamber PPM who develop AHRE have increased risk of neurological events. Comprehensive assessment of the risks and benefits of prescribing anticoagulants should be considered in PPM patients with AHRE ≥2 min.     

Effect of early metoprolol before PCI in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction on infarct size and left ventricular ejection fraction. A systematic review and meta‐analysis of clinical trials

AimThis meta‐analysis aims to look at the impact of early intravenous Metoprolol in ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) before percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on infarct size, as measured by cardio magnetic resonance (CMR) and left ventricular ejection fraction.MethodsWe searched the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library, and Web of Science. We included only randomized control trials that reported the use of early intravenous Metoprolol in STEMI before PCI on infarct size, as measured by CMR and left ventricular ejection fraction. RevMan software 5.4 was used for performing the analysis.ResultsFollowing a literature search, 340 publications were found. Finally, 18 studies were included for the systematic review, and 8 clinical trials were included in the meta‐analysis after the full‐text screening. At 6 months, the pooled effect revealed a statistically significant association between Metoprolol and increased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) compared to controls (mean difference [MD] = 3.57, [95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.22–4.92], p < .00001), as well as decreased infarcted myocardium(g) compared to controls (MD = −3.84, [95% [CI] = −5.75 to −1.93], p < .0001). At 1 week, the pooled effect revealed a statistically significant association between Metoprolol and increased LVEF (%) compared to controls (MD = 2.98, [95% CI = 1.26−4.69], p = .0007), as well as decreased infarcted myocardium(%) compared to controls (MD = −3.21, [95% CI = −5.24 to −1.18], p = .002).ConclusionA significant decrease in myocardial infarction and increase in LVEF (%) was linked to receiving Metoprolol at 1 week and 6‐month follow‐up.     

Serum lipoprotein(a) and risk of periprocedural myocardial injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Recent studies and guidelines have indicated that lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]was an independent risk factor of arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aimed to determine the relationship between serum Lp(a) levels and the risk of periprocedural myocardial injury following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in coronary heartdisease (CHD) patients. This study enrolled 528 nonacute myocardial infarction (AMI) coronary heart disease (CHD) patients who successfully underwent PCI. Fasting serum lipids including Lp(a) were tested before PCI. High‐sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs‐cTnI) was tested before PCI and 24 h after PCI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between preprocedural Lp(a) levels and postprocedural cTnI elevation from 1 × upper limit of normal (ULN) to 70 × ULN. As a continuous variable, multivariate analyses adjusting for conventional covariates and other serum lipids revealed that increased Lp(a) levels were independently associated with the risk of elevated postprocedural cTnI values above 1 × ULN (odds ratio [OR] per log‐unit higher: 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.68, P = 0.033], 5 × ULN (OR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.02–1.53, P = 0.032), 10 × ULN (OR: 1.48, 95%CI: 1.18–1.86, P = 0.001) and 15 × ULN (OR: 1.28, 95%CI: 1.01–1.61, P = 0.038). As a categorical variable, Lp(a) > 300 mg/L was an independent risk factor of postproceduralc TnI≥1 × ULN (OR 2.17, 95%CI 1.12–4.21, P = 0.022), ≥5 × ULN (OR 1.82, 95%CI 1.12–2.97, P = 0.017) and ≥10 × ULN (OR 2.17, 95%CI 1.33–3.54, P = 0.002). Therefore, it could be concluded that elevated preprocedural Lp(a) levels were associated with the risk of PCI‐related myocardial injury in non‐AMI CHD patients.