经尿道前列腺汽化电切同期钬激光碎石治疗前列腺增生症合并膀胱结石效果观察

目的探讨经尿道前列腺汽化电切(TUVP)同期钬激光碎石治疗前列腺增生症(BPH)合并膀胱结石的疗效。方法对40例BPH合并膀胱结石患者,实施TUVP同期钬激光碎石治疗。结果本组40例患者均顺利完成手术,手术平均时间81.08 min,平均碎石时间44.60 min,TURP时间控制在30~90 min,平均70.00 min。平均术中出血量68.0 m L,平均切除前列腺质量39.92 g。术后拔除导尿管时间3~7 d。术中无大出血、膀胱穿孔及电切综合征。。切除组织病理报告均为良性前列腺增生。术后复查KUB,结石清除率100%。术后IPSS评分降至8~10分,最大尿流率为16 m L/s。结论经尿道前列腺汽化电切同期钬激光碎石治疗BPH合并膀胱结石创伤小、出血少、并发症低,临床应用效果肯定。     

经尿道前列腺电切术加钬激光碎石术治疗前列腺增生伴膀胱结石

目的:目的探讨BPH合并膀胱结石的治疗方法。方法:对19例BPH并膀胱结石患者行经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)加钬激光碎石。结果:19例患者均获成功,其中钬激光碎石用时20～50min,平均35min,术后平均住院6.5(5～8)天。术后膀胱结石均完全清除。术后最大尿流率(Qmax)均大于15ml/s,IPSS为1～8分。结论:同期行TURP术及钬激光碎石治疗BPH合并膀胱结石具有损伤小,恢复快,疗效可靠等优点。     

独一味胶囊辅助经尿道微创手术治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的临床效果

目的:研究独一味胶囊辅助经尿道微创手术治疗高龄高危患者前列腺增生(BPH)合并膀胱结石的临床效果.方法:选取我院2019年1月—2019年9月收治的高龄BPH合并膀胱结石患者180例,随机分为对照组和研究组各90例,两组均采用经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)联合钬激光(HLL)碎石术进行治疗,研究组在手术治疗的基础上术前...     

经尿道前列腺汽化电切联合钬激光碎石治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石

目的探讨前列腺汽化电切(TUVP)和钬激光同期治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的疗效及安全性。方法总结24例前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者,应用钬激光经尿道膀胱镜粉碎膀胱结石并同期行TUVP的临床资料。结果24例患者中,膀胱结石均一次碎石成功,碎石后行TUVP,无膀胱结石残留、膀胱穿孔及水中毒发生,手术时间62~160min,平均手术时间88 min,切除前列腺质量20~120 g,平均38 g,术后平均拔除尿管时间3~6 d,平均4.75 d,平均住院时间10 d,所有患者术后均排尿通畅,无尿失禁。结论TUVP和钬激光同期治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石是一种安全有效的治疗方法,具有损伤小、结石清除率高、并发症少等优点。     

电切镜下同期治疗BPH并发膀胱结石疗效观察

目的：探讨BPH并发膀胱结石更为有效的治疗方法.方法：采用TURP联合电切镜下钬激光碎石术同期治疗BPH并膀胱结石患者23例,即通过电切镜电切攀通道置人经过裁剪的输尿管导管及钬激光光导光纤行膀胱结石钬激光碎石,冉行TURP.结果：23例均一次性手术成功,取石率100%,手术时间30～80 min,平均56 min,其中碎石时间3～20 min,平均9 min 术中无膀胱穿孔、膀胱出血、TURS 术后留置导尿3～5天,术后住院时间4～9天,平均5.6天 术后随访3～18个月.无结石复发,无尿道狭窄.结论：采用TURP加电切镜下钬激光碎石术治疗BPH并膀胱结石具有手术时间短、创伤小及安全等优势,能够治疗膀胱较大结石、多发结石,对治疗伴有膀胱出血患者更显优势.     

前列腺增生并膀胱结石的腔内治疗

目的探讨经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)结合钬激光碎石术治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)并膀胱结石的疗效。方法采用TURP结合钬激光碎石术治疗42例BPH并膀胱结石患者，并分析其疗效。结果所有患者均一次性处理成功，无严重并发症。疗效满意。结论，TURP结合钬激光碎石术是治疗BPH并膀胱结石的一种安全、高效的方法。尤其适用于高龄、高危患者。     

经皮膀胱镜钬激光联合经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗高危前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的临床疗效分析

目的对高危前列腺增生(BPH)合并膀胱结石患者给予经皮膀胱镜钬激光联合经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗,分析其临床疗效。方法选取2010年至2016年本院收治的行经皮膀胱镜钬激光联合经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗的高危前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者76例,对其临床资料进行回顾性分析,观察临床疗效。结果所有患者均手术成功,碎石平均时间为(24.3±5.2)分钟;前列腺电切平均时间为(70.8±24.6)分钟,术后均未出现明显并发症,住院平均时间为(6.2±2.3)天。与术前比较,术后3个月国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分及残余尿量等均明显降低,最大尿流率(Qmax)明显升高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对高危前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者给予经皮膀胱镜钬激光联合经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗具有创伤小,手术时间短,恢复快等优势,是治疗BPH合并膀胱结石的有效方法。     

经尿道腔内同期微创手术治疗良性前列腺增生症合并膀胱结石的临床观察

目的 探讨良性前列腺增生(BPH)合并膀胱结石经尿道腔内同期微创手术治疗的临床效果。方法 选取2016年1月—2021年7月抚宁区人民医院收治前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者130例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组65例。观察组行经尿道膀胱结石气压弹道碎石术(transurethral barometric trajectory lithotomy,TUBTL)或经尿道膀胱结石钬激光碎石术(transurethral holmium laser lithotripsy, TUHLL),同期经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术(plasmakinetic resection of prostate, PKRP),对照组行TUBTL或TUHLL。观察对两组患者的各项手术指标,对两组患者手术前、后以及组间的症状改善情况进行对比分析。结果 130例患者均手术成功。膀胱结石碎石手术时间8～35 min,平均(17±5.6) min[其中钬激光碎石时间8～20 min,平均(14±3.2) min;气压弹道碎石时间10～35 min,平均(18±6.2) min],术后住院时间5～8 d,平均(6.9±0.6) ...     

58例良性前列腺增生症合并膀胱结石患者经尿道前列腺汽化电切术联合钬激光碎石术的治疗分析

目的分析经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(TUVP)联合钬激光碎石术治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)合并膀胱结石的效果及安全性。方法选取2018-12-2019-07间在温县人民医院接受TUVP联合钬激光碎石术治疗的58例BPH合并膀胱结石患者。对其临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组58例患者均成功完成手术。手术时间为61.63±12.80)min。术中、术后均未出现大出血、电切综合征(TUR-S)、结石残留、尿道狭窄等并发症。术后均获随访3~6个月,其间未发现膀胱结石复发。末次随访国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生存质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流量(Qmax),以及残余尿量(RUV)均较术前显著改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 TUVP联合钬激光碎石术治疗BPH合并膀胱结石患者,创伤小、并发症发生率及复发率低,效果肯定。     

钬激光碎石联合前列腺电切Ⅰ期治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石的体会

目的探讨钬激光碎石联合前列腺电切Ⅰ期治疗前列腺增生症（BPH）合并膀胱结石的疗效。方法对钬激光碎石术联合前列腺电切术Ⅰ期治疗BPH合并膀胱结石58例患者的临床资料予以分析。结果 58例均一次手术治疗成功,术后复查腹部平片,膀胱内均未见结石残留,清石率达100%。术中无输血,无TURP综合征、膀胱穿孔及严重感染等并发症。术后4～7天拔除尿管,排尿通畅,3个月～2年为58例患者不同的随访期,最大尿流率（Qmax）及残余尿并予生活质量（QOL）、国际前列腺症状评分（IPSS）,均有明显改善。结论钬激光碎石联合前列腺电切是一种治疗BPH合并膀胱结石微创而较理想的治疗方法。     

PlasmaKinetic Superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the PlasmaKinetic (PK) Superpulse system with that of conventional transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in terms of restoration of urinary flow and early postoperative course. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred five men older than 45 years with lower-urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were randomized, 51 undergoing standard TURP with glycine as the irrigation fluid and 53 TURP with the PK Superpulse system with normal saline as irrigant. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, catheter time, change in serum electrolytes (particularly sodium), and uroflowmetry and American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Scores were compared. RESULTS: The blood loss as well as the catheter time observed in the PK Superpulse arm were significantly less than those in the conventional-TURP arm. The mortality rate was 0 in both the arms. The mean operative time was less in the PK Superpulse arm, although not significantly so. Hyponatremia was statistically insignificant. Significant changes were observed in the AUA Scores in both arms. CONCLUSION: The PK Superpulse system provides faster removal of tissue in a bloodless field with better views and a safer environment of saline irrigation with efficacy comparable to that of conventional TURP. However, further randomized trials with extended follow-up may be needed to better define the role of the PK Superpulse system in treating patients with symptomatic BPH.     

Rigid transurethral ureteroscopy

Since March 1984 we have performed ureteroscopy in 58 patients. The indications were ureteric calculi in 49 cases and dilatation of ureteric strictures, evaluation of unexplained haematuria, evaluation of ureteric filling defects and the insertion of ureteric stents in the remainder. Stone removal was successful in 33 patients (67%). We have found rigid ureteroscopy to be a time-consuming procedure with a high risk of minor injury, but long-term complications are uncommon and we believe that rigid ureteroscopy should be the procedure of choice for the management of calculi in the lower and middle thirds of the ureter.     

Long-term followup of randomized transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus transurethral prostatic resection study

PURPOSE: We evaluate the durable effect of high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy and transurethral prostatic resection for treatment of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1996 and March 1997, 155 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction were randomized to receive transurethral microwave thermotherapy (Prostatron*; device and commercial software) (82) or undergo transurethral prostatic resection (73). Initial patient evaluation was performed according to international standards. Patients were followed annually with the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) and uroflowmetry (maximum flow rate). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to calculate the cumulative risk of re-treatment, adjusted for loss to followup. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients received transurethral microwave thermotherapy and 66 underwent transurethral prostatic resection. Median followup was 33 months. In the thermotherapy group mean maximum urinary flow rate improved from 9.2 ml. per second at baseline to 15.1, 14.5 and 11.9 ml. per second at 1, 2 and 3 years, and mean I-PSS decreased from 20 to 8, 9, and 12, respectively. In the resection group the corresponding numbers for maximum urinary flow rate were 7.8, 24.5, 23.0 and 24.7 ml. per second at 1, 2 and 3 years, and for I-PSS were 20, 3, 4 and 3, respectively. At 36 months, 14 patients in the thermotherapy and 8 from the resection groups underwent re-treatment, and the cumulative risk was 19.8% (95% confidence interval 10.4% to 29.3%) and 12.9% (4.5% to 21.3%), respectively (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Transurethral microwave thermotherapy and transurethral prostatic resection achieve durable improvement in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of bladder outflow obstruction, while the magnitude of improvement is higher with resection. The repeat thermotherapy is based on failure of therapy whereas repeat resection is based on complications of therapy.     

三种经尿道前列腺切除手术的疗效比较

目的：比较前列腺增生症（BPH）的三种经尿道手术的治疗效果。方法：分别采用尿道前列腺电切术（TURP）、经尿道前列腺电气化术（TUVP）和经尿道接触式激光前列腺切除术（TULP）治疗BPH共357例。结果：TULP及TUVP的手术时间比TURP缩短,出血明显减少,膀胱冲洗时间、置管时间及住院时间均短于TURP。结论：三种经尿道手术方法都是治疗BPH的有效手段,其疗效TURP与TUVP相似,TULP稍逊,但TULP跟TUVP与TURP比较操作更易掌握,出血量及并发症更少,联合应用TUVP和TURP或TULP相TURP可缩短手术时间、增加前列腺切除量和提高疗效。     

Comparative study of transurethral laser prostatectomy versus transurethral electroresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Recently, less invasive transurethral laser prostatectomy, such as visual laser ablation (VLAP) or interstitial laser coagulation (ILCP), have been developed. Herein, we investigated the efficacy of VLAP and ILCP compared to TURP. METHODS: A total of 80 patients with BPH were treated: 20 patients by VLAP, 30 patients by ILCP and 30 patients by TURP. All patients were followed up for 12 months after their operations. Treatment outcomes were evaluated by four different criteria: (i) the International Prostatic Symptom Score (I-PSS), (ii) the maximum flow rate (Qmax), (iii) postvoided residual urine volume before treatment and one, three, six and 12 months after treatment, and (iv) prostatic volume before operation and three and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: The I-PSS, Qmax and residual urine volume were significantly improved compared to baseline levels and the improvement continued for 12 months in the three groups: for I-PSS (P<0.001 in the VLAP group and P<0.0001 in the ILCP and TURP groups), Qmax (P<0.001 in the VLAP and ILCP groups, and P<0.0001 in the TURP group), residual urine volume (P<0.01 in the VLAP group and P<0.0001 in the ILCP and TURP groups). Significant reduction of the prostatic volume was recorded only in the ILCP and TURP groups (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Visual laser ablation and ILCP can be good alternative treatments for BPH. Visual laser ablation provides good outcomes in patients with small-sized BPH and with risk factors such as heart disease or anticoagulation therapy.     

经尿道前列腺电汽化术所致电切综合征的特点及防治

目的：探讨经尿道前列腺电汽化术(TVP)所致电切综合征(TURS)的特点及防治方法。方法：回顾性分析我院1996～2004年施行的2100例TVP所致27例TURS患者的临床资料,分析术中发生TURS的特点、与手术操作的关系及防治措施。结果：本组27例中,21例均出现不同的TURS症状,出现症状前可伴有血糖升高及低钠血症、中心静脉压升高以及血压波动。术中有22例出现前列腺包膜穿孔(88．2%),经利尿和补充高渗氯化钠溶液等处理后,症状均获改善,未发生死亡。结论：TVP中发生TURS,与操作技术密切相关,严密观察先兆症状及监测血糖、电解质、中心静脉压等,可较早发现TURS。利尿及纠正低钠血症是防治TURS的有效手段。     

Measurement of residual adenoma after transurethral resection of the prostate by transurethral enucleation technique

OBJECTIVE: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) leaves a lot of residual adenoma and has a high recurrence rate, but the residual adenoma weight has not been measured surgically. Using surgery we tried to measure the residual adenoma after TURP. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Total adenoma resection was performed via standard TURP in 64 cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia and the weight of the residual adenoma was measured by transurethral enucleation (TUE) of the prostate. RESULTS: Prostate volume averaged 37.4 ml and adenoma volume averaged 20.6 ml by TRUS. The average weight of the prostate removed by TURP was 9.8 g. After TURP residual adenoma was confirmed in all cases by TUE, and the average weight of the residual adenoma was 10.2 g. The total average prostate volume removed by TURP and TUE was 20.1 g. The average residual rate of the adenoma removed by TURP was 54.5%. CONCLUSION: TURP leaves about half of the adenoma. Therefore, TURP might be very difficult for complete resection of an adenoma.     

经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与普通电切术中失血量比较

目的比较经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术与普通电切术中失血量。方法自2007年10月至2008年3月,收治的30例BPH患者行经尿道等离子双极电切（PKRP）;自2008年4月至7月,收治的30例BPH患者行普通电切（TURP）。分析这60例患者的临床资料。PKRP组年龄（74．2±7．0）岁,前列腺体积（49．3±33．1）ml;TURP组年龄（73．2±7．2）岁,前列腺体积（51．1±23．2）ml。收集术中所有冲洗液,测冲洗液体积,混匀后精确测血红蛋白浓度。结果PKRP组手术时间（111．3±42．5）min,切除前列腺组织重量（20．1±14．3）g,失血量（86．3±79．9）ml,每克前列腺组织平均失血量（3．7±1．9）ml／g;TURP组手术时间（108．0±42．2）min,切除前列腺组织重量（23．6±13．1）g,失血量（201．8±178．7）ml,每克前列腺组织平均失血量（8．3±6．1）ml／g。PKRP组和TURP组手术时间及切除前列腺组织重量差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。PKRP组术中失血量少于TURP组（P〈0．01）。PKRP组每克前列腺组织平均失血量少于TURP组（P〈0．01）。结论经尿道前列腺等离子双极电切术中失血量少于普通电协。     

Septicemia after transurethral prostatectomy

Septicemia occurred in 18 of 1,604 patients subjected to transurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate. Six patients died postoperatively, 4 of septicemia. In 11 patients septicemia was provoked by TUR in the presence of urinary infection and in the absence of appropriate antibiotic cover. Septicemia was provoked by catheter removal in 2 similarly infected patients. In the remaining 5 patients the urine was sterile at operation but became infected prior to catheter removal, and this maneuver precipitated septicemia.