Selected Comparisons and Implications of a National Rural and Urban Survey on Health Care Access, Demographics, and Policy Issues

As the national health debate evolved over the past two years, a need to better understand the differential constraints of rural health delivery and popular attitudes toward policy initiatives became apparent. Selected 1994 and 1995 results of two national surveys designed to compare rural and urban household responses are reported. The average distance those living in rural households must travel to access medical providers and emergency care is nearly double that of urban household residents. Rural household resident responses show a higher level of acceptance of nonphysician health care providers such as physicians assistants and registered nurses. Means testing of Medicare programs and use of special indicators for providing more Medicaid funds to states with medically underserved and sparsely populated areas are examples of two policy initiatives that receive favorable responses from both urban and rural household residents, but would disproportionately benefit rural areas.     

Rural‐Urban Differences in Health Services Utilization in the US‐Mexico Border Region

Purpose: Evaluate the association between driving distance to the US‐Mexico border and rural‐urban differences in the use of health services in Mexico by US border residents from Texas. Methods: Data for this study come from the Cross‐Border Utilization of Health Care Survey, a population‐based telephone survey conducted in the Texas border region in spring 2008. Driving distances to the border were estimated from the nearest border crossing station using Google Maps. Outcome measures included medication purchases, physician visits, dentist visits, and inpatient care in Mexico during the 12 months prior to the survey. A series of adjusted logit models were estimated after controlling for relevant confounding factors. Findings: The average driving distance to the nearest border crossing station among rural respondents was 4 times that of urban respondents (42.0 miles vs 10.3 miles [P < .001]). Rural respondents were more likely to be dissatisfied than urban respondents with the health care provided on the US side of the border, yet they were less likely to use health services in Mexico. Driving distance to the border largely explained the observed rural‐urban differences in medication purchases from Mexico. In the case of inpatient care, however, rural respondents reported a higher utilization rate than urban respondents and this rural‐urban difference became more pronounced after adjusting for the effect of driving distance to the border. Conclusions: Dissatisfaction with US health care services in rural communities in the US‐Mexico border region seems to be compounded by the lack of access to health care services in Mexico due to travel distance constraints.     

Distance, Use of Resources, and Mortality Among Rural Missouri Residents With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Abstract: Prompt access to medical services is considered critical in managing acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Several socioeconomic and geographic factors affect access to such care in rural areas. This study measured the effect of geographic distance from care on utilization of cardiovascular technology and death after AMI. The records of 1,658 rural Missouri residents age 65 or older with a discharge diagnosis of AMI in 1991 were obtained from Medicare data. The rate of use of cardiovascular technology and rate of post-AMI mortality for rural Missouri residents who live far from emergency departments and cardiac referral centers (CRC) were compared with those who live nearest such services. Those living 60 miles or more from a CRC were less likely to have cardiac catheterization (odds ratio [OR]=0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.40 to 0.75) or angioplasty (OR=0.68; 95% CI=0.47 to 0.98), compared with those living fewer than 30 miles from a CRC. There were no differences in 30-day, 90-day, or one-year mortality rates. After adjusting for distance to a CRC, those living 20 miles or more from emergency services were more likely to have coronary artery bypass grafting (OR=1.92; 95% CI=1.18 to 3.15) than those living fewer than 10 miles from such services, but there was no difference in mortality. Distance from services strongly predicts utilization of cardiovascular resources, but it does not predict mortality among rural Missouri Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized with AMI.     

An Analysis of Medicare''s Incentive Payment Program for Physicians in Health Professional Shortage Areas

CONTEXT: Medicare's Incentive Payment (MIP) program provides a 10% bonus payment to providers who treat Medicare patients in rural and urban areas where there is a shortage of generalist physicians. PURPOSE: To examine the experience of Alaska, Idaho, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Washington with the MIP program. We determined the program's utilization and which types of physicians received payments. METHODS: Retrospective cohort design, utilizing complete 1998 Medicare Part B data. Physician specialty was determined through American Medical Association data. Rural status was determined by linking the physician business ZIP code to its Rural-Urban Commuting Area code (RUCA). FINDINGS: There were 2,220,275 patients and 39,749 providers in the cohort, including 9,769 (24.6%) generalists, 21,331 (53.7%) specialists, and 8,649 (21.8%) nonphysician providers. Over $4 million in bonus payments (median payment = $173) were made to providers in HPSAs. Specialists and urban providers received 58% and 14% of the bonus reimbursements, respectively. Two million dollars in payments were not distributed because the providers did not claim them. Over $2.8 million in bonus claims were distributed to providers who likely did not work in approved HPSA sites. CONCLUSIONS: The MIP bonus payments given to providers are small. Many providers who should have claimed the bonus did not, and many providers who likely did not qualify for the bonus claimed and received it. Consideration should be given to focusing and enlarging the bonus payments to specific providers, rather than rewarding all providers equally. Policy makers should also consider a system that prospectively determines provider eligibility.     

Health services access and use among older adults in North Carolina: urban vs rural residents.

OBJECTIVES. This study compared health service use and satisfaction with health care among older adults living in urban vs rural counties in North Carolina. METHODS. A stratified random sample of 4162 residents of one urban and four rural counties of North Carolina was surveyed to determine urban/rural variation in inpatient and outpatient health service use, continuity of care and satisfaction with care, and barriers (transportation, cost) to care. RESULTS. Inpatient and outpatient service use did not vary by residence in controlled analyses. Continuity of care was more frequent in rural counties. Transportation was not perceived as a barrier to health care more frequently in rural than in urban counties, but cost was a greater barrier to care among rural elderly people. CONCLUSIONS. In this sample, older persons living in rural counties within reasonable driving distance of urban counties with major medical centers used health services as frequently and were as satisfied with their health care as persons in urban counties. Cost of care, however, was a significant and persistent barrier among rural elderly people, despite Medicare coverage.     

Patterns of travel for rural individuals hospitalized in New York State: relationships between distance, destination, and case mix.

The travel patterns of individuals living in rural areas of New York State who were discharged from short-term general hospitals in New York State in 1983 are examined. Counties are used as the geographical unit, and rural individuals who cross geographic boundaries to obtain inpatient hospital care are compared with those who receive such care in their own geographic area. Hospital serving the rural population of New York are classified into three types: urban, consisting of all hospitals located in MSAs; rural referral centers; and other rural hospitals. Next, the rural patients who are admitted to each of these three types of hospitals are characterized in terms of distance traveled, case mix, length of stay, and age. Individuals who travel beyond the counties adjacent to their county of residence had a higher case mix index but were less likely to be more than 75 years old. Distance traveled and the expected cost of care were strongly positively related for patients admitted to urban and rural referral center hospitals, but were only weakly related for other rural hospitals. Finally, comparisons of rural patients in these three types of hospitals were performed adjusting for DRG mix, a comparison which is relevant to hospital reimbursements under the Medicare Prospective Payment System. Using several measures of illness severity, rural patients in urban hospitals and rural referral center hospitals were more severely ill than rural patients in other rural hospitals after adjusting for DRG mix. We conclude that somewhat higher payments to urban hospitals and rural referral center hospitals in New York are justified based on the more severely ill patients which they treat     

Is travel distance a barrier to veterans' use of VA hospitals for medical surgical care?

Lengthy travel distances may explain why relatively few veterans in the United States use VA hospitals for inpatient medical/surgical care. We used two approaches to distinguish the effect of distance on VA use from other factors such as access to alternatives and veterans' characteristics. The first approach describes how disparities in travel distance to the VA are related to other characteristics of geographic areas. The second approach involved a multivariate analysis of VA use in postal zip code areas (ZCAs). We used several sources of data to estimate the number of veterans who had priority access to the VA so that use rates could be estimated. Access to hospitals was characterized by estimated travel distance to inpatient providers that typically serve each ZCA. The results demonstrate that travel distance to the VA is variable, with veterans in rural areas traveling much farther for VA care than veterans in areas of high population density. However, Medicare recipients also travel farther in areas of low population density. In some areas veterans must travel lengthy distances for VA care because VA hospitals which were built over the past few decades are not located close to areas in which veterans reside in the 1990s. The disparities in travel distance suggest inequitable access to the VA. Use of the VA decreases with increases in travel distance only up to about 15 miles, after which use is relatively insensitive to further increases in distance. The multivariate analyses indicate that those over 65 are less sensitive to distance than younger veterans, even though those over 65 are Medicare eligible and therefore have inexpensive access to alternatives. The results suggest that proximity to a VA hospital is only one of many factors determining VA use. Further research is indicated to develop an appropriate response to the needs of the small but apparently dedicated group of VA users who are traveling very long distances to obtain VA care.     

Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Outpatient Health Care Utilization by Older Rural and Urban New England Veterans

CONTEXT: Older veterans often use both the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and Medicare to obtain health care services. PURPOSE: The authors sought to compare outpatient medical service utilization of Medicare-enrolled rural veterans with their urban counterparts in New England. METHODS: The authors combined VHA and Medicare databases and identified veterans who were age 65 and older and enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service plans, and they obtained records of all their VHA services in New England between 1997 and 1999. The authors used ZIP codes to designate rural or urban residence and categorized outpatient utilization into primary care, individual mental health care, non-mental health specialty care, or emergency room care. FINDINGS: Compared with their urban counterparts, veterans living in rural settings used significantly fewer VHA and Medicare-funded primary care, specialist care, and mental health care visits in all 3 years examined (P<.001 for all). Compared with urban veterans, veterans living in rural settings used fewer VHA emergency department services in 1998 and 1999 but more Medicare-funded emergency department visits in 1997. The authors found some evidence of substitution of Medicare for VHA emergency visits in rural veterans, but no other evidence of like-service substitution. Rural veterans were more reliant on Medicare for primary care and on VHA services for specialty and mental health care. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that rural access to federally funded health care is restricted relative to urban access. Older veterans may choose different systems of care for different health care services. With poor access to primary care, rural veterans may substitute emergency room visits for routine care.     

Bypassing of Local Hospitals by Rural Medicare Beneficiaries

Several previous studies of hospital utilization by nonelderly rural residents suggest that local rural hospitals have been increasingly bypassed, often for care in urban hospitals. This resulted in lost volume for rural hospitals, detracting from their financial viability. It is not clear to what extent elderly rural residents also bypass local hospitals and whether this reflects regionalization of treatment for some conditions or avoidance of local hospitals assumed to provide inadequate care. This study examines hospital use by aged rural Delaware Medicare beneficiaries living in a ZIP code area that has a local hospital during Fiscal Year (FY) 1987 (N = 670). Most of these Medicare beneficiaries were hospitalized locally. Those beneficiaries who bypassed local rural hospitals usually did so because cardiovascular surgical procedures were required and were often only performed in large urban teaching hospitals. Beneficiaries using nonlocal hospitals were similar to users of local hospitals with respect to age and sex and traveled an average of nearly 42 miles for treatment. "Bypassing" here appears to be due primarily to regional specialization of care rather than abandonment of local rural hospitals by rural residents.     

Entrance and Exit of Obstetrics Providers in Rural Alabama

In Alabama between 1985 and 1989, a total of 94 physicians outside of the four largest cities in the state dropped the obstetrics portion of their practices or left practice in their communities altogether. During the same period 82 physicians entered obstetrics practice in this area. The study presented here used survey and archival data to compare practice characteristics of generalists and specialists in rural and town counties who made different decisions about providing obstetrics care. More generalists left and more specialists entered practice both in town and in rural counties. Rural counties lost more obstetrics providers because more generalists provided the obstetrics care in these areas. Across both specialty and county categories, physicians in group practice who accepted Medicaid and had local access to larger numbers of patients were more likely to remain or begin new obstetric practices. During this period, some obstetrics specialists moved into rural communities that had previously supported only generalist physicians. These findings suggest that the options for organizing successful obstetrics practices have narrowed, putting solo and generalist physicians who operate small-scale obstetrics practices at a disadvantage. These physicians also face competition from obstetrics specialists who are beginning to enter practice in the rural areas of the state. Designing policies that effectively improve geographic access to care requires a realistic understanding of the practice constraints faced by obstetrics providers. For example, as centralized specialist group practices serve residents from surrounding rural areas, programs that facilitate linkages, such as satellite clinics and use of mid-level practitioners, can be promoted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prenatal care utilization in rural areas and urban areas of Haiti.

OBJECTIVES: This study is based on the 2000 Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) conducted in Haiti. Using the DHS information on women aged 15 to 49 who had given birth during the three years preceding the survey interview, this study was intended to: (1) examine the determinants of the likelihood of the women using prenatal care in the rural areas and in the urban areas of the country and (2) for the women who made at least one prenatal care visit, examine the determinants of the number of prenatal visits in the rural areas and the urban areas. METHODS: The multivariate analysis used logistic models to identify which factors explained the decision to seek prenatal care, and negative binomial models were used to determine how many prenatal visits were conducted by the subgroup of women who did make prenatal care visits. RESULTS: Estimated at the mean values of the control variables, the expected probability of using prenatal care services in rural Haiti was 77.16%, compared to 85.83% in urban Haiti. Among users of prenatal care services, mothers in rural areas made an expected number of 3.78 prenatal care visits, compared to 5.06 visits for the women in urban areas. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial percentage of pregnant women have access to prenatal care services in Haiti, but mothers in rural areas who decided to seek care still fell slightly below the four visits recommended by the World Health Organization. The education levels of both mothers and their partners is a dominant predictor of prenatal care use. Longer travel times and greater distances to health centers in rural areas constituted barriers to repeated visits. Policymakers and health care providers need to take these findings into consideration as they decide on the delivery and management of health care services in Haiti.     

Geographic proximity to immunization providers and vaccine series completion among children ages 0–24 months

ObjectivesIn the U.S., vaccination coverage is lower in rural versus urban areas. Spatial accessibility to immunization services has been a suspected risk factor for undervaccination in rural children. Our objective was to identify whether geographic factors, including driving distance to immunization providers, were associated with completion of recommended childhood vaccinations.MethodsWe analyzed records from Montana’s immunization information system for children born 2015–2017. Using geolocated address data, we calculated distance in road miles from children’s residences to the nearest immunization provider. A multivariable log-linked binomial mixed model was used to identify factors associated with completion of the combined 7-vaccine series by age 24 months.ResultsAmong 26,085 children, 16,503 (63.3%) completed the combined 7-vaccine series by age 24 months. Distance to the nearest immunization provider ranged from 0 to 81.0 miles (median = 1.7; IQR = 3.2), with the majority (92.1%) of children living within 10 miles of a provider. Long distances (>10 miles) to providers had modest associations with not completing the combined 7-vaccine series (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.96–0.99). After adjustment for other factors, children living in rural areas (measured by rural-urban commuting area) were significantly less likely to have completed the combined 7-vaccine series than children in metropolitan areas (aPR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.85–0.92).ConclusionsLong travel distances do not appear to be a major barrier to childhood vaccination in Montana. Other challenges, including limited resources for clinic-based strategies to promote timely vaccination and parental vaccine hesitancy, may have greater influence on rural childhood vaccination.     

Chiropractic Use by Urban and Rural Residents With Insurance Coverage

ABSTRACT:  Purpose: To describe the use of chiropractic care by urban and rural residents in Washington state with musculoskeletal diagnoses, all of whom have insurance coverage for this care. The analyses investigate whether restricting the analyses to insured individuals attenuates previously reported differences in the prevalence of chiropractic use between urban and rural residents as well as whether differences in provider availability or patient cost-sharing explain the difference in utilization. Methods: Claims data from 237,500 claimants in 2 large insurance companies in Washington state for calendar year 2002 were analyzed, using adjusted clinical group risk adjustment for differences in disease burden and rural urban commuting area codes for rurality definition. Findings: The proportion of claimants using chiropractors was higher in rural than urban residents (44% vs 32%, P < .001). Lack of conventional providers in rural areas did not completely explain this difference, nor did differences in patient cost-sharing or demographics. Among those who used chiropractors, those in urban areas had more chiropractic visits than users of chiropractic in rural areas. Conclusions: Among insured adults, use of chiropractic care was higher in rural than in urban areas. Reasons suggested for this difference in previous reports were not borne out in this data set.     

Dental visits in older Western Australians: a comparison of urban, rural and remote residents

OBJECTIVE: It has been reported that the aged in rural areas may not access regular dental care. The aim of this study was to describe dental visits for those 60 years of age and older living in urban, rural and remote locations in Western Australia and to determine factors associated with such visits. The main outcome was having had a dental visit in the previous 12 months. DESIGN: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted. SETTING: Urban, rural and remote locations in Western Australia. SUBJECTS: A total of 2100 participants, 60 years of age and older. RESULTS: The present study demonstrated that people in rural and remote areas of Western Australia had a longer time since their last dental visit than people in urban areas. Within each sex, age, country of birth, income, occupation and education group, the highest proportion of people having attended a dentist in the previous 12 months was in urban areas and the lowest was in remote areas. Controlling for sex, age, education and oral health status, compared to urban residents, rural residents were 14% less likely to have seen a dentist and remote residents were 27% less likely. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that for the aged sector of the Western Australian population, geographical location is a major factor in the frequency of use of dental services and the reasons for dental visits. This raises concerns that improvement of oral health by prevention and early detection of tooth and gum problems is less likely to occur in rural and remote areas than in urban areas.     

Distance and health care utilization among the rural elderly

This paper explores the relationship between distance and the utilization of health care by a group of elderly residents in rural Vermont. By drawing on recent work on the geography of health we frame the decision to visit a primary care physician in the context of the experience of place. The paper devises a test of this broader reading of the role of distance for utilization, and operationalizes this test using a custom designed survey. Using a randomized mail survey of elderly residents of Vermont's North East Kingdom we explore how grocery shopping, travel to work, home location relative to local services, access to private transportation, and living arrangements are associated with the number of doctor visits made to primary health care providers. Although the results confirm the idea that increased distance from provider does reduce utilization, they strongly suggest that distance to provider is a surrogate for location in a richer web of relations between residents and their local communities. We conclude by calling for further research that establishes links between place and the use of health facilities.     

Does the Universal Health Insurance Program Affect Urban‐Rural Differences in Health Service Utilization Among the Elderly? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study in Taiwan

Purpose: To assess the impact of the introduction of Taiwan's National Health Insurance (NHI) on urban‐rural inequality in health service utilization among the elderly. Methods: A longitudinal data set of 1,504 individuals aged 65 and older was constructed from the Survey of Health and Living Status of the Elderly. A difference‐in‐differences model was employed and estimated by the random‐effect probit method. Finding: The introduction of universal NHI in Taiwan heterogeneously affected outpatient and inpatient health service utilization among the elderly in urban and rural areas. The introduction of NHI reduced the disparity of outpatient (inpatient) utilization between the previously uninsured and insured older urban residents by 12.9 (22.0) percentage points. However, there was no significant reduction in the utilization disparity between the previously uninsured and insured elderly among rural residents. Conclusions: Our study on Taiwan's experience should provide a valuable lesson to countries that are in an initial stage of proposing a universal health insurance system. Although NHI is designed to ensure the equitable right to access health care, it may result in differential impacts on health service utilization among the elderly across areas. The rural elderly tend to confront more challenges in accessing health care associated with spatial distance, transportation, social isolation, poverty, and a lack of health care providers, especially medical specialists.     

TYRANNY OF DISTANCE? THE HEALTH OF MID-AGE WOMEN LIVING IN FIVE GEOGRAPHICAL AREAS OF AUSTRALIA

Over 14 000 women aged 45–50 are participating in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health, which is designed to track the health of Australian women for 20 years, and to understand lifestyle and healthcare factors that influence women's health. The study deliberately overrepresents women from rural and remote areas. This analysis of baseline data from the study compares the responses of women living in urban areas (capital city, other metropolitan), large rural centres, small rural centres, other rural areas and remote areas (remote centres, other remote areas) of Australia. The data show that while women in this age group who live in rural and remote areas have similar levels of self-rated health, they have significantly fewer visits to general practitioners and specialists ( P < 0.001) and more visits to alternative healthcare providers than women living in urban areas. Rural and remote area women were also more likely to undergo gynaecological surgery than women living in urban areas ( P < 0.001). Other results suggest that being overweight is more common among women from rural and remote areas, and that these women also report lower levels of stress than women from urban areas ( P < 0.001). Further follow up will allow any divergence in health and healthcare equity to be explored as these women get older.     

Rural-Urban Differences in Health Risks, Resource Use and Expenditures Within Three State Medicaid Programs: Implications for Medicaid Managed Care

This study uses Medicaid claims data for income-eligible enrollees in California, Georgia and Mississippi to compare expenditures, resource usage and health risks between residents of rural and urban areas of the states. Resource use is measured using the Resource Based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) system for professional services, hospital days and outpatient facility visits; it also is valued at private insurance reimbursement rates for the states. Health risks are measured using the diagnosis-based Adjusted Clinical Group system. Resource use is compared on a risk-adjusted basis with the use of urban Medicaid enrollees as the benchmark. We find that actual expenditures for rural care users are lower than for urban care users. However, because the proportion of Medicaid enrollees who use care is higher in rural than in urban areas in all three states, expenditures per rural enrollee are not consistently lower. Case mix is more resource intensive for rural compared to urban residents in all three states. Although resource usage is not systematically lower overall for rural enrollees, on a risk-adjusted basis they tend to use less hospital resources than urban enrollees. Capitation rates based on historical per enrollee expenditures would not appear to under-reimburse managed care organizations for the care of rural as opposed to urban residents in the study states.     

Illness severity and propensity to travel along the urban-rural continuum

In this paper, we examine whether the relationship between severity of illness and the propensity to travel greater distance relative to the norm (defined by peers in one's county of residence) is uniform across the urban-rural continuum of geography or over time. We focus on the elderly in New York State who have been admitted to hospital for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs), admissions which are presumed to be representative of usual travel patterns. The two periods of time examined span the implementation of the Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997, which established the Medicare Rural Hospital Flexibility Program, a major national initiative to strengthen rural health care with the development of rural Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs). As the number of NY rural hospitals certified as CAH increased with the expanded funding from the BBA, one might expect to see increased distance traveled by more severely ill rural elderly, as their CAHs referred them to their affiliated support hospitals. The logistic regression estimates support this expectation, highlighting an asymmetrical relationship between relative distance and severity across patients in rural and urban areas. Despite a general decline in average propensity to travel further than the norm across the landscape, severity had a larger impact on travel propensity in rural areas, which increased over time.