Sentinel node biopsy in early vulvar cancer

Lymph node pathologic status is the most important prognostic factor in vulvar cancer; however, complete inguinofemoral node dissection is associated with significant morbidity. Lymphoscintigraphy associated with gamma-probe guided surgery reliably detects sentinel nodes in melanoma and breast cancer patients. This study evaluates the feasibility of the surgical identification of sentinel groin nodes using lymphoscintigraphy and a gamma-detecting probe in patients with early vulvar cancer. Technetium-99m-labelled colloid human albumin was administered perilesionally in 37 patients with invasive epidermoid vulvar cancer (T1-T2) and lymphoscintigraphy performed the day before surgery. An intraoperative gamma-detecting probe was used to identify sentinel nodes during surgery. A complete inguinofemoral node dissection was then performed. Sentinel nodes were submitted separately to pathologic evaluation. A total of 55 groins were dissected in 37 patients. Localization of the SN was successful in all cases. Eight cases had positive nodes: in all the sentinel node was positive; the sentinel node was the only positive node in five cases. Twenty-nine patients showed negative sentinel nodes: all of them were negative for lymph node metastases. Lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel-node biopsy under gamma-detecting probe guidance proved to be an easy and reliable method for the detection of sentinel node in early vulvar cancer. This technique may represent a true advance in the direction of less aggressive treatments in patients with vulvar cancer.     

Sentinel lymph node procedure is highly accurate in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva and to investigate whether step sectioning and immunohistochemistry of sentinel lymph nodes increase the sensitivity for detection of metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1996 and July 1999, 59 patients with primary vulvar cancer were entered onto a two-center prospective study. All patients underwent sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with technetium-99m-labeled nanocolloid and intraoperative blue dye). Radical excision of the primary tumor with uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy was performed subsequently. Sentinel lymph nodes and lymphadenectomy specimens were sent for histopathologic examination separately. Sentinel lymph nodes, negative at the time of routine pathologic examination, were re-examined with step sectioning and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: In 59 patients, 107 inguinofemoral lymphadenectomies were performed (11 unilateral and 48 bilateral). All sentinel lymph nodes, as observed on preoperative lymphoscintigram, were identified successfully intraoperatively. Routine histopathologic examination showed lymph node metastases in 27 groins, all of which were detected by the sentinel lymph node procedure. The negative predictive value for a negative sentinel lymph node was 100% (97.5% confidence interval [CI], 95% to 100%). Step sectioning and immunohistochemistry showed four additional metastases in 102 sentinel lymph nodes (4%; 95% CI, 1% to 9%) that were negative at the time of routine histopathologic examination. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique is highly accurate in predicting the inguinofemoral lymph node status in patients with early-stage vulvar cancer. Future trials should focus on the safe clinical implementation of the sentinel lymph node procedure in these patients. Step sectioning and immunohistochemistry slightly increase the sensitivity of detecting metastases in sentinel lymph nodes and should be included in these trials.     

Lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe tracing in detecting breast cancer lymph node involvement: can they replace axillary lymph node dissection?

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node status is the most important pathological determinant of prognosis in early breast cancer. However, axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) performed for pathological assessment is not without costs and morbidity. Recently, radioisotope-guided sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has been proposed as a promising technique for staging breast cancer patients. AIM OF THE STUDY: In this study we report our experience (76 patients) in radioguided sentinel node (SN) biopsy in breast cancer. The study was divided into two phases: the first represents our learning curve, necessary to establish our guidelines for its use in clinical practice, while the second phase was aimed at assessing the feasibility of SN localization using preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma probe (GP) detection. METHODS: All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy (LS) up to two hours after tracer delivery (99mTc-micro-nanocolloid, four i.d. injections of 200 microCi/200 miccroL around the primary lesion) 24 hours before surgery and GP tracing during surgery. Subsequently ALND was performed for pathological assessment. RESULTS: SNs were identified in 73/76 patients using LS and in 72/76 using GP. In one case the SN was detected by GP alone while in two cases GP was not able to locate the SN although it had been identified by means of LS. Thirty-three of these 73 patients had axillary node involvement. In 31/33 cases the SN was the only positive node. No positive nodes were found in the remaining 40 ALNDs where SNs were identified. Thus, according to our experience 40/73 ALNDs could have been avoided. SNB seems to be a very interesting technique but further experience in lymph node radioisotope tracing is needed.     

Localization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer by combined lymphoscintigraphy, blue dye and intraoperative gamma probe

Axillary lymph node status represents the most important prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. A severe limitation of this technique is the relatively high rate of false negative sentinel lymph nodes (>5%). We studied 284 patients suffering from breast cancer; 264 had T1 tumors (16 T1a, 37 T1b and 211 T1c), while 20 had T2 tumors. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy 18-h before surgery. At surgery, 0.5 mL of patent blue violet was injected subdermally, and the sentinel lymph node (SN) was searched by gamma probe and by the dye method. The surgically isolated SN was processed for intraoperative and delayed examinations. The SN was successfully identified by the combined radioisotopic procedure and patent blue dye technique in 278/284 cases (97.9%). Analysis of the predictive value of the SN in relation to the status of the axillary lymph nodes was limited to 191 patients undergoing standard axillary dissection irrespective of the SN status. Overall, 63/191 (33%) identified SNs were metastatic, the SN alone being involved in 37/63 (58.7%) patients; a positive axillary status with negative SN was found in 10/73 (13.7%) patients with metastatic involvement. In T1a-T1b patients the SN turned out to be metastatic in 9/53 patients (17.0%). In 7/9 patients the SN was the only site of metastasis, while in 2/9 patients other axillary lymph nodes were found to be metastatic in addition to the SN. None of the 44 patients in whom the SN proved to be non-metastatic showed any metastatic involvement of other axillary lymph nodes. Our results demonstrate a good predictive value of SN biopsy in patients with breast cancer; the predictive value was excellent in those subjects with nodules smaller than 1 cm.     

Sentinel node localization in primary melanoma: learning curve and results

Ninety primary melanoma patients were studied to investigate the importance of adopting the simultaneous use of patent blue dye (PBD) and lymphoscintigraphy plus gamma detection probe to locate the sentinel node (SN). In total 135 SNs in 105 basins were visualized preoperatively under a gamma camera after lymphoscintigraphy. When a SN was identified intraoperatively, its radioactivity level and colour were verified and documented. Two of the SNs seen on lymphoscintigraphy were not found. Using PBD 78.52% of the SNs were identified; 95.5% were identified using the gamma detection probe. Using both methods together 98.5% of the SNs were detected. Twenty-two patients (24.4%) had pathologically positive SNs. The surgical learning curve was assessed for the two techniques. The learning curve associated with the methodology was important in finding the SN when using PBD associated with lymphoscintigraphy, but not when the gamma detection probe was used; we found a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of stained SNs found using PBD in the initial 14 SNs biopsied compared with the subsequent 121 nodes. This is important as not all institutions have access to a gamma probe. The time required to identify each SN was documented and analysed. The duration of the procedure was significantly shorter for stained SNs than for non-stained SNs, which support the use of both PBD and the gamma probe. In conclusion, SN biopsy should be performed by surgeons and nuclear medicine doctors in co-operation, both methods being adopted simultaneously to reduce the percentage of procedure failures.     

核素淋巴显像识别前哨淋巴结在乳腺癌治疗中的应用

目的评价核素淋巴显像和γ探针定位在乳腺癌中确定前哨淋巴结(SLN)的应用价值,验证前哨淋巴结活检替代腋窝淋巴结清除术用于乳腺癌治疗的安全性与价值。方法选择1999年6月至2009年11月本院住院的女性乳腺癌患者206例(体检时腋窝均未扪及肿块),应用99Tcm-DX37～74 MBq或99Tcm-SC74 MBq经皮下注射,行核素淋巴显像后,术中注射专利兰1 ml和(或)术中用γ探针定位并行前哨淋巴结活检,与术中冰冻病理检查结果对照。若术中冰冻发现有前哨淋巴结转移,则行腋窝淋巴结清除术,若前哨淋巴结阴性,则不做腋窝淋巴结清除,术后定期随访。结果 206例乳腺癌术中成功活检SLN204例,成功率为99.0%(204/206)。本组有64例仅行SLN切除,术后病理检查证实64例SLN均阴性,故未行腋窝淋巴结清除,其中仅1例于术后1年时出现腋窝淋巴结转移,其余63例患者在随访期间均未发现腋窝淋巴结转移,也未出现同侧上肢水肿、感觉及活动异常;另140例行腋窝淋巴结清除,其中6例经病理证实SLN阳性但腋窝淋巴结为阴性,134例经病理证实SLN阳性35例,阴性99例,腋窝淋巴结阳性37例,阴性97例。核素淋巴显像和γ探针定位法的灵敏度为94.6%(35/37例),准确率为98.5%(138/140),假阴性为5.4%(2/37)。结论核素淋巴显像和γ探针定位应用于乳腺癌是切实可行和可能的,对预测腋窝淋巴结转移有很大的临床实用价值。如技术方法规范,早期乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检则能取代常规的腋窝淋巴结清除术,乳腺癌手术上肢并发症的发生率可大大降低。     

Gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients.

AIM: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the pre-operative detection of sentinel node (SN) metastasis in breast cancer patients. METHODS: Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was performed in patients with stage I or II breast cancer with clinically negative nodes using dye and radio-isotope. Axillas of 60 patients in whom a hot spot was detected by gamma probe were examined by ultrasonography. Pre-operative diagnosis of SN metastasis by gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided FNAB was compared with the histological results of SN. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity and overall accuracy of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of SN metastasis were 50.0%, 92.1% and 76.7%, respectively. SNs were visualized by ultrasonography in 29 of 60 patients. Of 14 patients with positive results by ultrasonography, four had positive and two had negative cytology. The combination of ultrasonography and ultrasonographically-guided FNAB for visualized nodes had a sensitivity of 78.5%, specificity of 93.3% and overall accuracy of 86.2%. Blind FNAB in the hot spot was not useful in the detection of SN metastasis in patients whose SNs failed to be detected by ultrasonography. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma probe and ultrasonographically-guided FNAB is a potentially useful method for pre-operative detection of SN metastasis. In patients with positive SNs, SNB is not indicated and complete axillary lymph-node dissection can be performed as a primary procedure. Copyright Harcourt Publishers Limited.     

Lymphatic mapping with intralesional tracer administration in breast carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the study were to determine how often a sentinel lymph node is visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in breast carcinoma patients, how often the sentinel lymph node is identified during surgery, and the sensitivity of these procedures to identify the presence of axillary lymph node metastasis. METHODS: A total of 136 patients were enrolled in 2 hospitals. Preoperative dynamic and static lymphoscintigraphy were performed; in addition, both a vital dye and a gamma detection probe were used intraoperatively. The tracers were injected into the primary lesion. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was followed by completion axillary lymph node dissection. The sentinel lymph nodes and other axillary lymph nodes were examined routinely and by immunohistochemical staining. RESULTS: A sentinel lymph node was visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in 118 patients (87%). During the operation a sentinel lymph node was localized in 126 patients (93%). A total of 224 sentinel lymph nodes were harvested (average of 1.7 and range of 1-4 sentinel lymph nodes per patient). Of all the sentinel lymph nodes, 37 were blue (17%), 68 were radioactive (30%), and 119 were both blue and radioactive (53%). The sentinel lymph nodes contained metastatic disease in 56 patients (44%). Three sentinel lymph node biopsies were false-negative (sensitivity 95%). CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy after intralesional tracer administration and intraoperative use of both a gamma detection probe and a vital dye is a reliable technique for staging the axilla of breast carcinoma patients.     

Sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and accuracy of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedure in vulvar cancer. METHODS: From April 2004 to September 2006, all patients with vulvar cancer, clinical stages I and II, underwent SLN detection, followed by a complete inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy. Demographic, surgical, and pathologic data on all patients were prospectively entered in a database. RESULTS: Forty-two patients underwent the SLN procedure. One patient was excluded from further analysis due to metastases to the vulva. The detection rate for at least 1 SLN per patient was 95%, with bilateral SLNs detected in 46% of patients. There was a trend toward improved ability to detect bilateral SLNs and proximity of the cancer to the midline (r = 0.996; P = .057). No contralateral SLNs were identified in patients with lateral vulvar lesions (>1 cm from the midline). For 'close-to-midline' (< or =1 cm from the midline) lesions, SLNs were detected in 93% of ipsilateral groins and bilateral SLNs were found in 46% of patients, whereas lesions abutting the midline had unilateral and bilateral SLN detected in 100% and 93%, respectively. Sixteen of 41 patients (39%) and 18 of 68 groins (26%) revealed metastatic disease in the lymph nodes; all were correctly identified by the SLN procedure. There were no false-negative SLN results. CONCLUSIONS: SLN dissection is feasible and safe to perform in vulvar cancer. The ability to identify bilateral sentinel inguinal lymph nodes appears to be related to the proximity of the vulvar cancer to the midline.     

Role of routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is rapidly emerging as the preferred technique for nodal staging in breast cancer. When radioactive colloid is used, a preoperative lymphoscintiscan is obtained to ease sentinel lymph node (SN) identification. This study evaluates whether preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds diagnostic accuracy to offset the additional time and cost required. 823 breast cancer patients underwent SNB based on lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe detection, and blue dye mapping using 99 mTc-nanocolloid and Patent Blue V injected peritumourally. The SNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed around 3 h after the radioisotope injection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy revealed SNs in 593 (72%) of the 823 patients imaged. SN visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy was less successful in large tumours and tumours involving the upper outer quadrant of the breast (P=0.046, P<0.001, respectively). Lymphoscintigraphy showed internal mammary sentinel nodes in 9% (62/707) patients. The SN was identified intraoperatively in 98% (581) patients who had SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, with a false-negative rate of 7%. In patients who did not have SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, the SN was identified at operation in 90% (204) patients, with a false-negative rate of 7%. The SN identification rate was significantly higher in patients with SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (P<0.001). SN identification rate intraoperatively using the gamma probe was significantly higher in the SN visualised group compared with the SN non-visualised group (95% vs. 68%; chi square (1 degrees of freedom (df)) P<0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in the false-negative rate and the operative time between the two groups. A mean of 2.3 (standard deviation (SD) 1.3) SNs per patient were removed in patients with SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy compared with 1.8 (SD 1.2) in patients with no SN visualised on lymphoscintigraphy (P<0.001). Although SN visualisation on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy significantly improved the intraoperative SN localisation rate, SN was successfully identified in 90% of patients with no SN visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy. Given the time and cost required to perform routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, these data suggest that it may not be necessary in all cases. It may be valuable for surgeons in the learning phase to shorten the learning curve and in patients who have increased risk of intraoperative failed localisation (obese or old patients). A negative preoperative lymphoscintiscan predicts the inability to localise with the hand-held gamma probe. Therefore, if the SN is not visualised on lymphoscintigraphy then the addition of intraoperative blue dye is recommended to increase the likelihood of SN identification.     

In vivo identification of sentinel lymph nodes for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer for abbreviation of mediastinal lymph node dissection

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that an identification of sentinel lymph node (SN) with a techenetium-99m (99mTc) tin colloid by ex vivo counting, i.e. the radio-activity of dissected lymph nodes, was a reliable method of establishing the first site of nodal metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer [J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 124(2002)486]. However, for SN navigation surgery, SN should be identified before lymph node dissection (in vivo) but not after that (ex vivo). In order to reduce mediastinal lymph node dissection for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by SN navigation surgery, the SN identifications for hilar lymph nodes by ex vivo counting, and for mediastinal lymph nodes by in vivo, were evaluated. METHODS: Intra-operative SN identification using 99mTc tin colloid was conducted on 104 patients with clinical stage I NSCLC who had had major lung resections with mediastinal lymph node dissections. The hilar SNs were identified by ex vivo counting (after lung resection) and the mediastinal SNs were identified by in vivo counting (before lymph node dissection). To evaluate the accuracy of mediastinal SN identification by in vivo counting, it was compared with the data by ex vivo counting. RESULTS: SNs were identified in 84 patients (81%). SNs were identified at the hilum by ex vivo counting in 78 patients (93%) and at the mediastinum by in vivo counting in 40 patients (48%). While 15 patients had lymph node metastases, i.e. N1 in six and N2 in nine, the SNs could be found to have metastases during operation in 13 of the 15 patients (87%). The in vivo counting of the mediastinum missed out the mediastinal SNs identified by ex vivo counting in four of the 84 patients (5%). CONCLUSION: If the hilar SNs identified by ex vivo counting and the mediastinal SNs identified by in vivo counting had no metastases, then mediastinal lymph node dissection could be abbreviated for patients with clinical stage I NSCLC.     

Radioisotopic lymphatic mapping of the sentinel node in melanoma: importance of immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND: Elective lymph node dissection (ELND) for patients with malignant melanoma is still controversial. A possible alternative could be biopsy of the first tumor draining lymph node, the sentinel node (SN), which can be identified by means of radionuclide techniques. AIM: Our study was undertaken to assess the accuracy of lymph node biopsy and to stress the importance of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the pathological assessment of the SN for improved staging of the primary tumor. METHODS: We performed lymphoscintigraphy (LS) in 183 melanoma patients (89 with melanoma of the legs, 11 of the arms and 83 of the trunk). Our protocol consisted of preoperative peritumoral i.d. injection of 99mTc-labeled microcolloid to define the regional lymphatic basin and identify the sentinel node by means of planar scintigraphy. In 147 of the 183 cases a gamma probe (GP) was used during surgery to trace the SN. Vital blue dye was used during surgery in all cases. The SNs were excised for pathological examination. The pathological status of the SN was defined by means of examination of frozen sections, hematoxylin-eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for S-100 and HMB-45 MAb. RESULTS: At least one separate focus of activity was identified by LS in 182 out of 183 patients; in all 147 cases where a GP was used, it was successful in tracing the SN. LS with cutaneous mapping of the SN successfully guided the surgical excision in 177 of the 183 cases; in the 7 remaining cases, i.e. 7 out of 83 cases with SNs in the axillary basin, GP was not used and no elective node dissection was performed. Metastases were found in 39 of these 177 cases. In all 39 cases the SNs were the only positive nodes in the basin. Of the 39 metastases 18 were identified by means of frozen section, 12 by means of hematoxylin-eosin, and 9 by means of immunohistochemistry. We therefore emphasize the importance of immunohistochemistry in the pathology of LS for improved staging of the primary tumor.     

Sentinel node and radioguided surgery in breast cancer of limited size. Preliminary experience at ASL 1, Massa e Carrara

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of sentinel node (SN) biopsy in breast cancer. Twenty-five female patients classified as T1N0 according to the TNM system of the UICC were evaluated with this procedure from April to October 1999. The day before surgery a subdermal injection of 99mTc-nanocoll within the tissue overlying the neoplastic lesion and subsequent lymphoscintigraphy were performed. In all patients the SN was detected with a radioguided probe during scintigraphy and surgery. Histological examination of the SN for detection of metastases was positive in four patients who subsequently underwent axillary dissection. In the remaining patients with normal SNs no axillary dissection was performed. The preliminary results confirm the validity of the sentinel node procedure.     

Detection of sentinel lymph nodes in gastric cancers based on immunohistochemical analysis of micrometastases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The sentinel lymph node (SN) theory has the potential to change the trend of surgery for gastric cancer that is based on wide resection of the stomach with dissection of regional lymph nodes. However, feasibility tests of SN mapping procedures in gastric cancers with analysis of micrometastasis are rare. This study aimed to estimate the clinical usefulness of SN mapping using a dual procedure with dye- and gamma probe-guided techniques for gastric cancers, based on immunohistochemical staining (IHC) analysis. METHODS: SN mapping procedures were performed on 41 patients with T1-T2 gastric cancer, and gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy followed. All SNs and non-SNs obtained from the patients were tested by IHC analysis using anti-cytokeratin antibodies. RESULTS: Using the dual mapping procedure, SNs were detected in all patients (100%). SN was positive in all patients with lymph node metastasis except in one with non-solid type poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with marked lymphatic permeation, thus achieving an accuracy rate of 98%. CONCLUSIONS: The method was accurate in predicting nodal status and could be an indicator for less invasive treatment in patients with gastric cancer.     

Management of vulvar cancers.

AIM: The radical surgical approach in the treatment of vulvar cancer patients has led to a favorable prognosis for the majority of the patients with early stage squamous cell cancer. However, the morbidity is impressive, leading to more individualized treatment. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the management of vulvar cancer. METHODS: We have reviewed the literature on the modifications in treatment of vulvar cancer with the emphasis on surgery and radiotherapy for primary disease. RESULTS: While surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for early stage squamous cell vulvar cancer (with wide local excision and uni- or bilateral inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy via separate incisions as standard treatment), until now there has been a limited role for primary radiotherapy although this may be an attractive alternative for the inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in the future. The sentinel lymph node procedure with the combined technique (preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with (99m)technetium-labeled nanocolloid and Patente Blue) is a promising staging technique for patients with vulvar cancer. The clinical implementation of the sentinel lymph node procedure and the role of additional histopathological techniques of the sentinel lymph nodes have to be investigated. In advanced vulvar cancer, chemoradiation followed by surgery should be regarded as the treatment of first choice for these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the rarity of vulvar cancer it is quite clear that further studies will have to be performed by international collaborative groups. The sentinel lymph node procedure and primary radiotherapy are promising methods to reduce morbidity of treatment, but their safety needs to be studied in clinical trials.     

Sentinel node study in early breast cancer

Since October 1997 60 patients with early breast cancer (T <3 cm) were studied. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy with two types of colloid: the first (17 pts) with a particle size <1,000 nm; the second (43 pts) with a particle size <80 nm. The standard procedure consists of injection, on the day before surgery, of 70 MBq of the smaller nanocolloid in 0.4 cc saline divided over four sites, around the lesion or subdermally around the surgical scar. We utilize a low-energy, high-resolution LFOV camera for scintigraphy and a probe specific for the sentinel node during surgery. In 56/60 patients (93.3%) lymphoscintigraphy showed the sentinel node (SN). In two cases the SN was not detected presumably because of lymphatic interruption by an old surgical scar; in the other two cases the sites of injection were too close to the SN, thus masking it. In five cases (9%) the SN was not visualized with the surgical probe but in two of these drainage to the internal mammary chain was observed. The apparently lower sensitivity of intraoperative localization was due to the extra-axillary lymphatic drainage or to the vicinity of the SN to the primary lesion. The SN proved to be metastatic in 12 cases. No false-negative SNs were found. In five cases (10%) the radiolabeled lymph node was the only node containing tumor cells (micrometastases): this result depends on the combined use of hematoxylin-eosin and rapid cytokeratin staining. The application of blue dye was useful for easier identification of the SN but did not allow detection of more SNs. Our preliminary results are extremely encouraging. Considering that at the early stages of breast cancer the likelihood of lymph node metastases is low (20% in our series) and no false negative were reported in this study, we conclude that with SN biopsy axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided, making surgery less aggressive but maintaining accuracy.     

High-resolution, hand-held camera for sentinel-node detection

BACKGROUND: The imaging probe (IP) is a high-resolution (HR), 1-in(2) field-of-view hand-held gamma camera. We used it to detect breast cancer sentinel node (SN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We divided 120 T1 breast cancer patients, who underwent Anger camera lymphoscintigraphy (ACL), in two subgroups of 60 patients who were age, body mass index, and cancer size matched: subgroup A (SA) and B (SB). SN was detected with a common gamma probe (GP) in SA, with IP plus GP in SB. RESULTS: Surgeons removed radioactive nodes without exceeding four nodes. Eighty-two (82) SNs were taken off in SA and 105 in SB (p<0.01). Of SA, 22 of 60 patients and 36 of 60 patients of SB showed more than 1 node, and 3 of them showed 3 nodes and 1 showed 4 nodes. Thirteen (13) patients resulted N(+) (21.6%) in SA. Ten (10) patients of SA showed an invasion on the hottest nodes and 3 on the second nodes. In the SB, 18 patients (25%) showed invasion. Sixteen (16) invasions were on hot, 4 on second, and 1 on the third node. Withdrawal time of SN was 11.25+/-4.7 minutes for SA and 7.4+/-2.8 minutes for SB (p<0.025). CONCLUSIONS: SN biopsy with IP is fast and discovers more SNs and more invasions than ACL.     

Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large series

BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection is an established component of the surgical treatment of breast cancer, and is an important procedure in cancer staging; however, it is associated with unpleasant side effects. We have investigated a radioactive tracer-guided procedure that facilitates identification, removal, and pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node (i.e., the lymph node first receiving lymphatic fluid from the area of the breast containing the tumor) to predict the status of the axilla and to assess the safety of foregoing axillary dissection if the sentinel lymph node shows no involvement. METHODS: We injected 5-10 MBq of 99mTc-labeled colloidal particles of human albumin peritumorally in 376 consecutive patients with breast cancer who were enrolled at the European Institute of Oncology during the period from March 1996 through March 1998. The sentinel lymph node in each case was visualized by lymphoscintigraphy, and its general location was marked on the overlying skin. During breast surgery, the sentinel lymph node was identified for removal by monitoring the acoustic signal from a hand-held gamma ray-detecting probe. Total axillary dissection was then carried out. The pathologic status of the sentinel lymph node was compared with that of the whole axilla. RESULTS: The sentinel lymph node was identified in 371 (98.7%) of the 376 patients and accurately predicted the state of the axilla in 359 (95.5%) of the patients, with 12 false-negative findings (6.7%; 95% confidence interval = 3.5%-11.4%) among a total of 180 patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node biopsy using a gamma ray-detecting probe allows staging of the axilla with high accuracy in patients with primary breast cancer. A randomized trial is necessary to determine whether axillary dissection may be avoided in those patients with an uninvolved sentinel lymph node.     

Validity of modified gastrectomy combined with sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer

Background The present study examined the clinical validity of modified gastrectomy for early gastric cancer, in terms of the results of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS), using infrared ray electronic endoscopy (IREE) plus indocyanine green (ICG) staining. Methods One-hundred and sixty-one patients with fT1N0 gastric cancer were enrolled in the study. ICG (0.5 ml, 5 mg/ml) was injected endoscopically into four quadrants of the submucosa surrounding the cancer. Twenty minutes after the injection, sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) stained with ICG were observed intraperitoneally around the serosa and surrounding fat tissue. IREE was used to illuminate regional lymph nodes from the serosal side. Results Group 2 lymph nodes were judged as SNs in 52 patients (32%). The most common locations of the SNs were stations No. 7 in each of the upper-, middle-, and lower-thirds of the stomach. In two patients, lymph node metastasis was positive. One of these patients, with cancer in the middle one-third of the stomach, had SNs in stations No. 3, 4sb, 4d, 7, and No. 11p, and had metastatic lymph nodes in No. 3 and No. 7 (all SNs). The other patient, with cancer in the lower one-third of the stomach, had SNs in No. 1, 3, 4d, and 6, and had a metastatic lymph node in No. 4d (SN). Skip metastasis was not observed in this study, and metastatic lymph nodes were judged to have been dissected by the D1+a procedure. Conclusion For T1N0 gastric cancer, modified gastrectomy (D1+a dissection) combined with SNNS is suitable; however, for those whose Group 2 lymph nodes are judged to be SNs, additional dissection of lymphatic basins detected by SNNS should be performed to confirm the absence of lymph node metastasis.     

Omitting axillary lymph node dissection in sentinel node negative breast cancer patients is safe: a long term follow-up analysis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the rate of axillary recurrences in sentinel node (SN) negative breast cancer patients without further axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1994 and November 1999, all SN negative breast cancer patients who did not underwent complete ALND were enrolled in this prospective study. SN biopsy was performed by using the triple technique which combines preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative use of blue dye, and a handheld gamma probe to visualize and localize the SN. SNs were examined by standard hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). During the first year after surgery all patients underwent clinical examination at 3 monthly intervals. This follow-up interval was prolonged to 6 month after the first year. RESULTS: From the 104 patients, 93 (89%) underwent breast-conserving therapy; all remaining patients were treated by modified radical mastectomy. In 91 cases a ductal carcinoma and in 13 cases a lobular carcinoma was diagnosed. One SN was removed in 80, two SNs in 18, and three SNs in 2 patients. Twenty patients received systemic therapy based on age and primary tumor characteristics. After a median follow-up of 57 month only one axillary recurrence was observed. During follow-up three patients developed distant metastases. One of these patient with metastases to the bone is alive with evidence of disease. The remaining two patients died 9 and 19 month after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our long term follow-up results indicate that survival is excellent (98%) and local axillary control is adequate (99%) after omitting ALND in a group of 104 SN negative breast cancer patients.