Quality of life after high-dose-rate brachytherapy monotherapy for prostate cancer

Purpose

There is little information in the literature on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) changes due to high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy monotherapy for prostate cancer.

Materials and Methods

We conducted a prospective study of HRQOL changes due to HDR brachytherapy monotherapy for low risk or favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. Sixty-four of 84 (76%) patients who were treated between February 2011 and April 2013 completed 50 questions comprising the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) before treatment and 6 and/or 12 months after treatment.

Results

Six months after treatment, there was a significant decrease (p<0.05) in EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual scores, including urinary overall, urinary function, urinary bother, urinary irritative, bowel overall, bowel bother, sexual overall, and sexual bother scores. By one year after treatment, EPIC urinary, bowel, and sexual scores had increased and only the bowel overall and bowel bother scores remained significantly below baseline values.

Conclusions

HDR brachytherapy monotherapy is well-tolerated in patients with low and favorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. EPIC urinary and sexual domain scores returned to close to baseline 12 months after HDR brachytherapy.     

Disease-specific quality of life among patients with localized prostate cancer: an Australian perspective

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in sexual, urinary and bowel function, and bother, in patients with prostate cancer after treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiation (EBRT), compared to a convenience sample of men with no diagnosis of prostate cancer, as little is known about the disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of men in Australia after treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective cross-sectional survey of 95 controls, 82 men with localized prostate cancer treated with RP and 39 with EBRT at > or = 2 years before data were collected. Disease-specific HRQoL was assessed using the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated measure that includes six subscales addressing sexual, urinary and bowel symptoms, and level of bother associated with the symptoms. Univariate analyses were conducted to ascertain differences in disease-specific HRQoL among the three groups. To minimize the influence of other factors, age and comorbid medical conditions were included as covariates. RESULTS: Men treated with RP had more sexual and urinary symptoms (both P < 0.001) than those treated with EBRT, and more sexual bother (P < 0.001). Men treated with EBRT reported significantly worse bowel function (P = 0.02) and more bother (P < 0.001) with these symptoms than those who had RP. CONCLUSIONS: Except for bowel dysfunction and the bother associated with these symptoms, disease-specific HRQoL was generally worse after RP than EBRT.     

Prospective assessment of time-dependent changes in quality of life of Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

The objective of this study was to characterize changes in the quality of life (QOL) of Japanese patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). This study included 298 consecutive localized prostate cancer (PC) patients undergoing RARP. The health-related QOL and disease-specific QOL were assessed using The Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short Form (SF-8) and The Extended Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), respectively, before and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after RARP. At 1 month after RARP, four (physical function, role limitations because of physical health problems, social function and role limitations because of emotional problems) of the eight scores in SF-8 were significantly impaired compared with those of baseline scores. However, all eight scores on all postoperative assessments, except for at 1 month after RARP, showed no significant differences from baseline scores. Although there were no significant differences in the bowel function, bowel bother, sexual bother, hormonal function or hormonal bother between baseline and postoperative assessments of EPIC at all time points, the urinary function, urinary incontinence and sexual function scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after RARP were significantly inferior to those of baseline scores, and urinary bother and urinary irritation/obstruction scores at 1 month after RARP were significantly impaired compared with those of baseline scores. These findings suggest that the health-related QOL of Japanese PC patients undergoing RARP may not be markedly deteriorated following RARP; however, as for the disease-specific QOL, urinary and sexual functions, particularly those early after RARP, appeared to be significantly impaired.     

Distress and social dysfunction following prostate cancer treatment: a longitudinal cross-cultural comparison of Japanese and American men

We assessed the impact of bother with urinary and bowel dysfunction on social activities among men in Japan and the United States following primary therapy for localized prostate cancer. In paired longitudinal outcomes studies, we measured general and disease-specific health-related quality of life in 400 Japanese and 427 American men who underwent radical prostatectomy or brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. Outcomes included the social function domain of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, all of which are scored 0-100. Participants completed the questionnaires before and 1, 12 and 24 months after treatment. Among men who reported any urinary bother, Japanese men had slightly better urinary function than American men (84 vs 77, P<0.01). Before brachytherapy, urinary bother was weakly correlated with social function in both the countries; after brachytherapy, urinary bother was strongly correlated with social function in American but not Japanese men. After brachytherapy, bowel dysfunction had a stronger correlation with social function in American than Japanese men (P<0.05). The bother associated with urinary and bowel dysfunction after surgery or brachytherapy for prostate cancer has a greater impact on social function in American men than in Japanese men.     

Health-related quality of life after radical retropubic prostatectomy and permanent prostate brachytherapy: a 3-year follow-up study

Objectives: To examine quality of life (QOL) for 3 years after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) or permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) and to determine differences between the two procedures. Methods: In all 107 patients who underwent RRP and 91 who received PPB between October 2005 and July 2007 were included in this study. QOL surveys were performed using the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), the Medical Outcome Study 8‐items short form health survey and the expanded prostate cancer index composite at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after treatment. Results: At 3 years, all parameters for general QOL and almost all for disease‐specific QOL were similar to those at 12 months. Urinary continence after RRP slightly improved from 12 months to 3 years, but it was still significantly worse than that after PPB. Scores for urinary irritation or obstruction and for bowel function and bother at 3 years were similar between the two groups. Sexual function and bother did not change between 12 months and 3 years in either group. Sexual function at 3 years after RRP was worse than that after PPB. Recovery from urinary incontinence and sexual function after RRP with nerve sparing were similar to those after PPB. Urinary incontinence at 3 years correlated with the treatment method and patients' age, whereas urinary irritation/obstruction and urinary bother correlated with the pre‐treatment IPSS. Conclusion: QOL assessment represents an important issue in prostate cancer management. Our findings are likely to be of aid in the development of a treatment plan for prostate cancer patients.     

Bother problems in prostate cancer patients after curative treatment

BackgroundMost previous studies of prostate cancer (CaP) patients have focused on functional side effects. In the decision about treatment, the patients' subjective experience of function (bother) should also be considered. In this prospective study of CaP patients, we used both categorical and dimensional methods to examine changes of sexual, urinary, and bowel bother after robot-assisted prostatectomy (RALP), after high dose radiotherapy alone (RAD), or with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (RAD + ADT). We also studied the associations between psychosocial factors and post-treatment bother and the correlations between bother and function at the follow-up time points.MethodsA total of 462 patients (n = 150 RALP, n = 104 RAD, and n = 208 RAD + ADT) completed questionnaires at all time points (baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment). Our outcome measures were the proportion of patients who regained their baseline bother core (PBS-100) and the mean group scores on sexual, urinary, and bowel bother based on the UCLA-PCI questionnaire. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) identified the time points at which various variables were significantly associated with bother at 2 years. The time points at which the proportions of bothered patients became stable were defined.ResultsThe different treatment modalities provided distinctive patterns over time regarding urinary, sexual, and bowel bothers. RALP gave sexual and urinary bother, RAD + ADT patients reported bowel and sexual bother, while RAD patient suffered mainly from bowel bother. According to GEE, the bother scores at 3 or 6 months were significantly associated with the bother scores at 24 months for all groups. PBS-100 and stability of the recovered bother domains was reached at 3 to 6 months. Strong correlations were observed between function and bother for the urinary and bowel domains but not for the sexual domain. The associations between psychosocial factors and bother were weak.ConclusionsTwo years after treatment, RALP patients mainly reported sexual and urinary bother, while irradiated patients were bothered by bowel dysfunction. Sexual, urinary, and bowel bother reached stable proportions at 3 to 6 months post-treatment. Based on GEE, bother at 6 months was in general significantly associated with bother at 24 months.     

Anxiety,depression and urological cancer outcomes: A systematic review

PurposeThe interplay between physical and mental aspects of a cancer diagnosis are well recognised. However, little consensus exists on the impact of depression and anxiety on urological cancer outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between these conditions and functional or oncological outcomes in urological malignancy.Materials and MethodsA systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health databases up to June 2020. Studies evaluating the relationship of anxiety and depression disorders or symptoms on functional and mortality outcomes were included. Outcome measures included validated urinary, sexual, body image questionnaire scores and all-cause or disease-specific mortality.ResultsOf 3,966 studies screened, 25 studies with a total of 175,047 urological cancer patients were included. Significant anxiety and depressive symptoms and disorders were found to impact functional outcomes in several cancer types. A consistent negative association existed for sexual function in prostate, testicular and penile cancer patients. Additionally, poorer urinary function scores were seen in prostate cancer, with increased body image issues in testicular and prostate cancer. Importantly, both overall and disease-specific mortality outcomes were poorer in bladder and prostate cancer patients.ConclusionsCo-existing depression and anxiety appears to be negatively associated with functional and mortality outcomes in urological cancers. This appears especially evident in male cancers, including prostate and testicular cancer. Although not proving causation, these findings highlight the importance of considering mental wellbeing during follow-up for early recognition and treatment. However, current evidence remains heterogenous, with further studies required exploring patients at risk.     

Patient reported outcomes and health related quality of life in localized prostate cancer: A review of current evidence

BackgroundOncological outcomes after localized prostate cancer (CaP) treatment are excellent and generally considered equivalent across treatment modalities. Thus, short, and long-term patient health related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important factor in treatment discussions. The purpose of this review was to assess the impact of treatment modality for localized CaP on HRQoL as reflected by recent published trials.MethodsWe conducted a literature review using the PubMed database for studies published between January 2010 and January 2021. We included randomized control trials and observational cohort studies examining HRQoL in patients with localized CaP treated with active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy.ResultsFour randomized control trials and 15 prospective cohort studies were reviewed. Current evidence suggests that surgery has the largest short and long-term negative effect on sexual function and incontinence but advantages with regards to bowel function and irritative-obstructive urinary symptoms. Radiation therapy mainly impacts urinary irritative symptoms and bowel bother. Short-term HRQoL outcomes for active surveillance are most favorable, however, during long-term follow up, there is no significant difference in comparison to radiation. Long-term global quality of life impact regarding anxiety, mental, emotional well-being, and fatigue seem to be equivalent between treatment modalities.ConclusionsThe choice of primary treatment modality for localized CaP results in a unique impact profile on cancer specific HRQoL in both the short and long-term periods. Understanding the different adverse events profiles can provide a basis for informing patients and clinicians regarding the impact of disease and treatments on quality of life and allow for a better patient centered discussion.     

Prospective longitudinal comparative study of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing invasive treatments for localized prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Health-related quality of life (QoL) concerns are important for patients selecting treatment options for clinically localized prostate cancer and are critical in evaluating outcomes. We report pretreatment and post-treatment general and disease-specific QoL for the following invasive interventions: open radical prostatectomy (ORP), laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP), and palladium-103 ((103)Pd) brachytherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective longitudinal survey of 452 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer treated at a single medical center between 2001 and 2003. An Institutional Review Board-approved questionnaire comprised of validated QoL instruments was sent to patients scheduled to undergo ORP (N = 186), LRP (N = 116), or brachytherapy (N = 150). The same questionnaire was sent out 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after therapy. Comparisons were made between the groups to determine if the choice of therapy resulted in differences in QoL. RESULTS: General QoL scores were minimally affected by the choices; however, the disease-specific domains of bowel, urinary, and sexual function were adversely affected by all modalities. The ORP and LRP groups were similar among disease-specific domains and received lower post-treatment urinary and sexual scores than the (103)Pd patients. At 12 months, 38% of ORP and 46% of LRP patients had returned to baseline urinary function compared with 75% of (103)Pd patients. At 12 months, 63% of (103)Pd patients had returned to baseline sexual function compared with 19% of both the LRP and ORP patients. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive treatments for localized prostate cancer have little impact on general QoL but significantly affect disease-specific domains. Both ORP and LRP have a greater initial negative impact on urinary and sexual function than (103)Pd. The differences among the treatments with regard to QoL provide information to patients faced with choosing a treatment.     

Radical prostatectomy versus high-dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: effects on health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of different treatments on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of men with localized prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1997 and August 2002, 182 men diagnosed with prostate cancer (T1c to T3bN0M0) had radical prostatectomy (RP, 89) or (192)iridium high-dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT, 93) with external beam radiotherapy, and were followed for > or = 6 months. A postal survey was sent in which HRQoL was assessed using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) QoL questionnaire, and disease-specific QoL using the University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI). RESULTS: Questionnaire responses were obtained from 151 of 182 patients; there was no significant difference in SF-36 scale scores between men treated with RP or HDR-BT. In the UCLA-PCI, the HDR-BT group had better urinary function (P < 0.001) and sexual function scores (P= 0.043). Men treated with RP had better bowel bother scores (P = 0.027). In patients with > or = 2 years of follow-up, urinary function (P < 0.001) and sexual bother (P = 0.029) were better for men treated with HDR-BT than for men treated with RP. Men treated with HDR-BT had significantly better urinary function (P = 0.009) and sexual bother (P = 0.013) even than 30 men treated with unilateral nerve-sparing RP. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of HRQoL, RP and HDR-BT did not differ, but HDR-BT resulted in better urinary and sexual function than RP. When planning treatment, QoL concerns, including mental health issues associated with prostate cancer, need to be addressed with the patients, as do the potential side-effects.     

Treatment outcomes and morbidity following definitive brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation for the treatment of localized prostate cancer: 20-Year experience at Mount Sinai Medical Center

ObjectivesTo present our treatment algorithm and 20-year experience in treating prostate cancer with brachytherapy since 1990, with focus on cancer-control outcomes and treatment-related morbidity.Methods and materialsWe selected patients treated for localized prostate cancer with brachytherapy, combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy, and adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy as prescribed by our Mount Sinai risk stratification and treatment algorithm. Outcomes were analyzed with respect to biochemical failure, distant metastases, prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. Morbidity was assessed with respect to urinary, sexual, and rectal outcomes.ResultsIn total, 2,495 patients met inclusion criteria. The 12-year actuarial freedom from biochemical failure was 83% (low risk: 90%, intermediate risk: 84%, and high risk: 64%); freedom from distant metastasis was 95%; prostate cancer-specific survival was 95%; and overall survival was 70%. On multivariate analysis, significant associations were found between cancer control and risk group, total biologically effective dose, and androgen deprivation therapy. With regard to morbidity, potency was preserved in 61%, and urinary symptoms improved in 35%. The 12-year actuarial freedom from urinary retention events was 90% and from severe rectal bleed was 93%.ConclusionsBrachytherapy, as administered via the Mount Sinai algorithm, remains an efficacious and benign treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer of all risk groups.     

Quality of life after radical prostatectomy in elderly men

Objectives:   To evaluate the impact of radical prostatectomy (RP) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in elderly men with prostate cancer.
Methods:   Between January 2002 and December 2006, a total of 205 elderly men (≥70 years) undergoing RP participated in our longitudinal outcome study. Patients completed general (Short Form 36) and disease-specific (University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index) HRQOL questionnaires. A t-test was used to compare each HRQOL score after RP with the baseline scores and Cox proportional hazard models to characterize the recovery trends.
Results:   Patients undergoing RP showed physical problems, which diminished over time. Several emotional domains significantly improved during the follow-up period. By 2 years postoperatively, 57% and 81% of subjects had fully returned to baseline urinary function and bother, respectively. Mean recovery time to baseline urinary function and bother was 8.3 months and 4.7 months, respectively. When incontinence was defined as 'no pad', 82% of patients reported continence. Whereas only 25% of patients returned to the baseline sexual function level, 83% had reached baseline sexual bother. Among those returning to their own baseline scores, the mean recovery time was 10.9 months for sexual function and 5.3 months for sexual bother.
Conclusions:   Selected elderly patients can achieve satisfactory functional outcomes after RP. These outcomes should be considered when decisions about treatment are made.     

Normal urinary and sexual function in men without evidence of prostate cancer from Montreal, Canada

OBJECTIVE: To examine the rates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED), and of associated bother, in men with no evidence of prostate cancer who participated in a prostate cancer-screening event. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 366 men with no established diagnosis of prostate cancer completed a questionnaire addressing SUI, ED and associated bother. Socio-economic status and presence of comorbidities were also examined. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of the men was 54.8 (33-80) years; 90% of the men (271) had no SUI, and 76% (231) reported no urinary bother. Conversely, 62% (189) reported some degree of ED and 27% (82) some degree of sexual bother. Urinary bother (P < 0.001), erectile function (P < 0.001), and sexual bother (P < 0.02) were associated with age. Of all the men, 36% had one or more comorbidities. Men with one or more comorbidities had worse erectile function than those men with no comorbidity (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Few studies address normative values of SUI and ED rates in men with no established diagnosis of prostate cancer. We quantified the rate of SUI and it was practically negligible. Conversely, some degree of ED affected most of the present screened population. These data may be used as baseline references to evaluate the magnitude of functional and bother detriments after various prostate treatments.     

Treatment-related toxicity and symptom-related bother following postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Introduction:

Patients have reported late effects and symptom-related bother following postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Methods:

Patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy were surveyed at a median 56 months after radiotherapy using the Prostate Cancer Radiation Therapy instrument. A retrospective review was undertaken to obtain Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-Late Effects Normal Tissue (RTOG-LENT) toxicity scores at baseline and during follow-up.

Results:

Survey response was 64.5%. Median prostate bed radiation dose was 66 Gy given at a median 14 months after surgery. Adjuvant hormone therapy was given for 2 to 3 years to 40 patients; 22 received salvage therapy.PCRT impairment subscales were reported as mild for gastrointestinal dysfunction, moderate for genitourinary dysfunction and marked for sexual dysfunction. The use of one or more incontinence pads daily was reported by 25.6% and was similar to 23% use reported at baseline. Frequent or worse urinary frequency or hematuria was reported by 4.8%, and by 8.4% of respondents for bowel dysfunction. Moderate to severe disruption from bowel and bladder dysfunction was reported by up to 5.4% and 2.4% of respondents, respectively.Erectile function was described as poor to none in 88.3% of respondents, and dissatisfaction with sexual functioning was reported by 42.7%. Counselling or treatment was offered to 59% of those followed.

Conclusion:

Combined surgery and postoperative radiotherapy are associated with low and moderate rates of bowel and bladder dysfunction respectively, with low reported bother. High levels of sexual dysfunction and bother are seen following combined therapy. More effective pre- and post-treatment counselling are required, along with research into more effective prevention and treatment strategies.     

Impact of age on quality of life in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with high‐dose rate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy

Objectives

To evaluate age‐related quality of life changes in patients with localized prostate cancer treated by high‐dose rate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy.

Methods

A total of 172 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were categorized to age groups <75 years and ≥75 years. Changes in their quality of life were evaluated using the Japanese version of Medical Outcome Study 8‐Items Short Form Health Survey, Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite and International Index of Erectile Function‐5 at baseline, and followed up to 24 months after treatment.

Results

There were no significant differences in Medical Outcome Study 8‐Items Short Form Health Survey scores, and urinary and bowel scores of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for older men after treatment. International Index of Erectile Function‐5 summary scores were significantly decreased in both groups. Although sexual function and sexual bother scores were decreased in patients aged <75 years, these scores were maintained in patients aged ≥75 years.

Conclusions

Quality of life of prostate cancer patients undergoing high‐dose rate brachytherapy combined with external beam radiation therapy does not seem to be significantly affected by age.     

Variation in patient reported outcomes following radical prostatectomy: A bi-national registry-based study

Background and objectiveRadical prostatectomy (RP) is a common and widely used treatment for localized prostate cancer. Sequela following RP may include urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction, outcomes which are recorded within a bi-national Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry. The objective was to report population-wide urinary incontinence and sexual function outcomes recorded at 12 months following RP; and to quantify and explore factors associated with variation in outcome.Materials and methodsThe Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry of Australia and New Zealand (PCOR-ANZ) was used for this study. Participants were treated with radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2020. Domain summary scores for urinary incontinence and sexual function from the EPIC-26 instrument were the main outcomes, taken at 12 months following surgery (6–18 months). "Major" urinary and sexual function bother were also assessed. Variation in outcomes was investigated using linear and logistic multivariable regression models adjusted for covariates: age, socioeconomic status, PSA at diagnosis, surgical technique, surgical specimen grade group, margin status, and clinician surgical volume.Results and conclusionsThe analytic cohort included 13,083 men with the mean urinary incontinence domain score being 76/100 (SD = 25) with 9.2% reporting major bother. For sexual function, the mean score was 29/100 (SD = 26) with 46% reporting major bother. Of the examined variables, age at surgery and surgical volume category were most predictive of function, with disparities exceeding minimally important differences, though large variation was observed between urologists within volume categories. There is considerable variation in 12-month postprostatectomy functional outcomes. Variation is explained by both patient and clinician factors, though some confounders are unmeasured in this cohort.     

Bothersome urinary symptoms and disease-specific quality of life in patients with benign prostatic obstruction

OBJECTIVES: Firstly, to describe self-reported urinary symptoms and bothersomeness, including disease-specific quality of life (QOL), in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) before and 6 months after intervention. Secondly, to identify factors which predict disease-specific QOL. Thirdly, to develop and test the reliability of an instrument to evaluate incontinence, the Link?ping Incontinence Questionnaire (LIQ). Finally, to translate and test the reliability of Swedish versions of the International Prostate Symptom Score, including the bother question, the American Urological Association Symptom Problem Index (SPI) and the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Disease-specific QOL was studied in 572/720 consecutively treated patients using structured questionnaires. The reliability of the instruments was tested in 122 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) or BPO. RESULTS: The frequency and weak stream items of the SPI were among those that best explained the patients' disease-specific QOL both before and after intervention. Before and after intervention the prevalence of urinary incontinence, assessed using the LIQ instrument, was 46% and 16%, respectively. Symptoms and disease-specific QOL improved most in the surgery group, intermediately in the transurethral incision of the prostate/transurethral microwave thermotherapy group and least in the drug therapy group. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency and weak stream items of the SPI were the factors that best explained disease-specific QOL. The prevalence of incontinence before and after intervention was higher than that previously reported.     

Single center experience with third-generation cryosurgery for management of organ-confined prostate cancer: critical evaluation of short-term outcomes, complications, and patient quality of life

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Technical refinements such as improved ultrasonographic localization and the routine use of urethral warmers and small-gauge needle delivery systems have renewed interest in cryosurgical treatment as a minimally invasive option for selected patients with localized prostate cancer. Only three reports of quality of life (QoL) in prostate cryoablation exist, and none report on patients treated with third-generation cryoablative technology. We critically examine our initial series of consecutive patients at a single institution undergoing primary third-generation cryosurgical treatment of localized prostate cancer with respect to treatment outcome, morbidity profile, and QoL parameters. To our knowledge, this is the first QoL report on third-generation cryoablation of the prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively review the records of 89 consecutive patients with median followup of 11 months (1-32) who have undergone third-generation cryosurgical ablation of the prostate as primary treatment for localized prostate cancer with intention to cure. Patients were risk stratified according to preprocedural parameters of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and Gleason score. PSA trends were recorded and treatment effectiveness was observed using different definitions of biochemical failure. Charts were reviewed for postprocedure complications. Quality of life was measured prospectively using the University of California, Los Angeles, Prostate Cancer Index as well as American Urological Association symptom scores. We compare a percent of baseline score (%BS) for various domains between our series of patients treated with primary cryoablation with a series of patients undergoing brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer. RESULTS: Treatment success was defined by achievement of a PSA nadir of < or =0.1 ng/mL and by biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) assessed with both a PSA threshold of < or =0.4 ng/dL over time and the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) definition of three consecutive rises in PSA. According to risk stratification, 86%, 81.5%, and 78% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, achieved a PSA nadir of < or =0.1 ng/mL. Overall, at 12 months follow-up, 94% of patients achieved BDFS using ASTRO criteria while 70% achieved BDFS using a PSA threshold of < or =0.4 ng/mL. With risk stratification, 74%, 70%, and 60% of low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively, achieved BDFS defined by PSA threshold of < or =0.4 ng/mL. Complications were rare. The response rate for Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) questionnaires was 71% for cryoablation patients and 51% for brachytherapy patients. At 12 months follow-up, patients undergoing cryoablation on average achieved urinary and bowel domain scores comparable to baseline, but sexual domains remained well below baseline. When compared with a brachytherapy series with better baseline sexual function (P = 0.04) and urinary function (P = 0.03), cryotherapy patients experienced more negative impact on sexual function steadily for up to 12 months (P = 0.02). Urinary function was similar between the groups until 18 months, at which time cryoablation patients fared better (P = 0.01); this was sustained up to 24 months (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment success with cryosurgery varies with definition; however, our results are comparable to other series with regard to short-term cancer control. Complication rates in this series of third-generation cryosurgical patients are low. QoL characteristics of third-generation cryoablation are similar to those described in second-generation cryoablation series. Compared with brachytherapy, cryotherapy results in less irritative and obstructive voiding symptoms in the early post-treatment period and may improve urinary function up to 24 months after treatment. In a small group of older patients with baseline erectile dysfunction undergoing cryoablation, sexual function returns to 20% of its baseline value with up to 12 months follow-up.     

Indications, results and techniques of permanent prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Introduction and objectiveProstate brachytherapy is a first-line therapeutic approach for localized prostate cancer in selected patients. We present our experience in brachytherapy and a thorough review of the literature.Materials and MethodsA review of the literature and evaluation of patient’s selection was done. Furthermore the implantation technique, oncological results according to the different risk groups and acute and chronic complications were also analyzed.ResultsThe biochemical relapse-free 10 year survival rate was 87-96% in low risk tumours and 63-86% in intermediate risk tumours. A total of 3-24% underwent urinary retention that required TURP in 0-8,7%. Other complications were urinary incontinence in 0-6,7%, proctitis in 0-15,5%, erectile dysfunction in 6,3-30%, rectal ulcer/fistula in 0-5,4%.ConclusionsProstate brachytherapy is a safe and effective treatment in low and intermediate risk patients with prostate cancer.     

The impact of cancer treatment on quality of life outcomes for patients with localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE: We evaluated the impact of localized prostate cancer treatment on general, cancer specific and symptom domains of quality of life for up to 5 years after diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 842 men from the Health Professionals Followup Study, diagnosed between 1993 and 1998, were included in cross-sectional analyses of quality of life associated with prostate cancer treatment. A subset of 146 men diagnosed after 1995 were followed prospectively. Quality of life was assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Status Survey, Cancer Rehabilitation Evaluation System Short Form and University of California Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index by mailed questionnaires. Primary treatment modality was taken from medical records and patient self-report. RESULTS: Significant treatment differences were observed in all quality of life measures, with the largest occurring in sexual, urinary and bowel symptoms. Bowel function was significantly worse in patients who received external radiation and brachytherapy compared with prostatectomy (p <0.05). Although they had better or equivalent urinary and sexual function (p <0.05), patients treated with external radiation, hormones or watchful waiting had lower generic quality of life scores in multiple domains compared with those who underwent prostatectomy. Patients who had brachytherapy had similar generic quality of life outcomes compared with prostatectomy in all domains. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that important differences in quality of life go beyond known physical symptoms associated with various prostate cancer treatment options, many of which involve making a trade-off. It is important for patients with prostate cancer and health care providers to consider these differences while making treatment decisions.