Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in gemcitabine refractory advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II study

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) are active as first-line therapy against advanced pancreatic cancer. This study aims to evaluate the activity and tolerability of this combination in patients refractory to standard gemcitabine (GEM). A total of 33 patients (median age of 57) were included with locally advanced and metastatic evaluable diseases, who had progressed during or following GEM therapy. The GEMOX regimen consisted of 1000 mg m(-2) of GEM at a 100-min infusion on day 1, followed on day 2 by 100 mg m(-2) of oxaliplatin at a 2-h infusion; a cycle that was given every 2 weeks. All patients received at least one cycle of GEMOX (median 5; range 1-29). Response by 31 evaluable patients was as follows: PR: 7/31(22.6%), s.d. > or = 8 weeks: 11/31(35.5%), s.d. < 8 weeks: 1/31(3.2%), PD: 12/31(38.7%). Median duration of response and TTP were 4.5 and 4.2 months, respectively. Median survival was 6 months (range 0.5-21). Clinical benefit response was observed in 17/31 patients (54.8%). Grade III/IV non-neurologic toxicities occurred in 12/33 patients (36.3%), and grade I, II, and III neuropathy in 17(51%), 3(9%), and 4(12%) patients, respectively. GEMOX is a well-tolerated, active regimen that may provide a benefit to patients with advanced pancreatic cancer after progression following standard gemcitabine treatment.     

吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗复发性晚期头颈部癌的临床研究

 目的 评价吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗复发性晚期头颈部肿瘤的疗效及毒副作用。方法 对复治的晚期头颈部肿瘤患者，给予GEM 1000mg／m²静滴，第1、8d，每周期CDDP 60mg／m²，静滴（分5次第1-5d），21d为1周期，2周期后评定疗效，平均3．52个周期。结果 27例可评价疗效，完全缓解1例，部分缓解7例，总有效率29．63％，中位缓解期4．4个月，中位生存期9个月。毒副作用主要为剂量限制性毒性，表现为骨髓抑制。结论 吉西他滨加顺铂可作为复发性晚期头颈部肿瘤的挽救性化疗方案。     

Gemcitabine alone or with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective, randomized phase III study of the Gruppo Oncologia dell'Italia Meridionale

BACKGROUND: A prospective, randomized Phase III trial was performed to determine whether, compared with gemcitabine (GEM) alone, the addition of cisplatin (CDDP) to GEM was able to improve the time to disease progression and the clinical benefit rate in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The objective response rate, overall survival rate, and toxicity patterns of patients in the two treatment arms were evaluated as secondary end points. METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced and/or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were randomized to receive GEM (Arm A) or a combination of GEM and CDDP (Arm B). In Arm A, a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) GEM per week was administered for 7 consecutive weeks, and, after a 2-week rest, treatment was resumed on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for 2 cycles. In Arm B, CDDP was given at a dose of 25 mg/m(2) per week 1 hour before GEM at the same dose that was used in Arm A. On Day 22, only GEM was administered. Patients were restaged after the first 7 weeks of therapy and then again after the other 2 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients entered the trial: Fifty-four patients were randomized to Arm A, and 53 patients were randomized to Arm B. The median time to disease progression was 8 weeks in Arm A and 20 weeks in Arm B; this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.048). In Arm A, one complete response and four partial responses were recorded on the basis of an intent-to-treat analysis, with an overall response rate of 9.2% (95% confidence interval [95%CI], 3-20%). In Arm B, there were no complete responses, whereas 14 partial responses were achieved, with an overall response rate of 26.4% (95%CI, 15-40%). This difference in the overall response rates was statistically significant (P = 0.02). The tumor growth control rate (i.e., total number of patients who achieved complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease) was 42.6% (95%CI, 29-57%) in Arm A and 56.6% (95%CI, 42-70%) in Arm B. A clinical benefit was observed in 21 of 43 patients (49%) in Arm A and in 20 of 38 patients (52.6%) in Arm B without any significant difference. The median overall survival was 20 weeks for patients in Arm A and 30 weeks for patients in Arm B (P = 0.43). Toxicity was mild in both treatment arms, with no significant differences between the two groups except for the statistically higher incidence of Grade 1-2 asthenia in Arm B (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of CDDP to GEM significantly improved the median time to disease progression and the overall response rate compared with GEM alone. The clinical benefit rate was similar in both arms, whereas the median overall survival rate was more favorable for Arm B, although the difference did not attain statistical significance. The authors conclude that the combination of CDDP and GEM currently may be considered as an optimal treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.     

Combination of low-dose cisplatin and gemcitabine for treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of the combination of low-dose cisplatin (CDDP) and gemcitabine (GEM) in elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II trial included 46 patients aged 70 years or older with previously untreated advanced NSCLC. All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. Treatment consisted of CDDP 50 mg/m(2) on day 1 plus GEM 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. Patients received a minimum of three courses unless progressive disease was detected. RESULTS: A total of 190 GEM-CDDP courses were administered (median 4.1 courses per patient). The chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated. No patients developed grade 4 toxicity. Grade 3 toxicities were as follows: neutropenia in six patients (13%), and anemia, thrombopenia and nausea/vomiting in one (2%) each. Two patients (4%) had mild nephrotoxicity. Of the 46 patients, 16 had a partial response (35%, 95% confidence interval, CI, 28-52%), 17 (37%) remained stable and 13 (28%) had disease progression. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status improved in 17 patients (37%), whereas 25 (54%, 95% CI 44-74%) showed a clinical benefit. Median time to progression was 20 weeks. Overall median survival was 44 weeks, with a 1-year actuarial survival rate of 35%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of low-dose CDDP and GEM for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is an effective and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic approach.     

吉西他滨为基础的化疗方案治疗进展期胰腺癌的临床研究

背景与目的:进展期胰腺癌预后差.吉西他滨可以改善胰腺癌患者的生存质量,但吉西他滨联合方案疗效是否优于单药,还存在争议,国内更缺乏相关的临床研究.本研究目的是比较吉西他滨为基础的联合化疗方案与吉西他滨单药治疗进展期胰腺癌的疗效.方法:回顾性分析2000～2005年收治的40例经临床或病理确诊的进展期胰腺癌临床资料,其中吉西他滨单药组15例,吉西他滨剂量为1 000 mg/m2,每周1次,连用7周,休息2周,之后每周1次,连用3周,4周重复;吉西他滨联合治疗组25例,联合化疗方案包括吉西他滨1 000 mg/m2,每周1次,连用2周,分别联合:(1)氟尿嘧啶425～600 mg/m2,静脉滴注或持续静脉泵入,d1-5,3周重复;(2)顺铂60～75 mg/m2,分第1、2天,3周重复;(3)奥沙利铂85～130 mg/m2,d1,3周重复;(4)卡培他滨l000 mg/m2,2次/天,d1-14,3周重复.采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析患者的生存期,并比较两组间的临床受益反应、中位疾病进展时间、中位生存时间和不良反应.结果:吉西他滨联合组与单药组患者的临床受益反应均得到改善(56.0% vs.46.7%),但疾病控制率、中位生存时间、临床受益反应在两组之间差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),不良反应的发生率也相似(P＞0.05).对Ⅲ～Ⅳ期患者进行分层分析,发现吉西他滨联合组疾病控制率高于单药组(75.0% vs.45.5%),但无统计学意义(P=0.13).结论:吉西他滨联合方案与单药治疗进展期胰腺癌相比,疗效、临床受益反应、中位生存时间两组相似.     

Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) increases the efficacy of cisplatinum plus gemcitabine combination in advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: In this non-randomized study we aimed to assess the efficacy of the addition of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatinum (CDDP) combination chemotherapy on survival by prevention of thromboembolic complications in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1999 and February 2004, 69 consecutive patients with APC were treated with GEM (800 mg/m2, day 1, day 8) plus CDDP (35 mg/m2, day 1, day 8) every 21 days +/-LMWH (nadroparine calcium, 2,850 IU/day until disease progression). Ten out of 35 patients in LMWH group and 10 out of 34 patients in chemotherapy alone group had primary inoperable locally advanced disease and the rest of the patients had metastatic disease. RESULTS: Total response rate was 58.8% (11.7% CR) for the patients treated with LMWH and 12.1% for those treated without LMWH (P = 0.0001). LMWH group had a better median time to progression (TTP) and survival when compared to control group (7.3 vs. 4.0 months, P = 0.0001; 13.0 vs. 5.5 months, P = 0.0001). The toxicity was similar and acceptable in both groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of LMWH to GEM plus CDDP combination significantly improved the response and survival in patients with APC and the current schedule deserves to be tested in phase III trials.     

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.     

吉西他滨单药或与顺铂联合治疗胰腺癌的临床疗效评价

目的 评价吉西他滨单药以及与顺铂联合治疗局部晚期或转移性胰腺炎的疗效。临床受益反应,生存时间和毒性反应。方法 42例患者随机分为吉西他滨单药组（A组20例）和吉西他滨 顺铂联合组（B组22例）,A组;吉西他滨1000mg/m^2,每周1次,连用7周,休息1周;随后相同剂量每周1次,连用3周,休息1周,B组;吉西他滨1000mg/m^2,每周1次,连用3周,顺铂60mg/m^2,第15天给药,休息1周,每4周重复,边境用药3个周期。结果 42例患者中,可评价客观疗效者34例（A组16例,B组18例,可评价临床受益反应（CBR）者36例（A组16例,B组20例）,可进行毒性反应评估者40例（A组19例,B组21例）,A组：PR1例（6.3%)。MR4例（25.0%),SD7例（43.8%)。PD4例（25.0%)。B组;PR2例（11.0%)。MR3例（16.7%),SD8例（44.4%),PD5例（27.8%)。PR MR SD率A组为75.0%。B组为72.2%。CBR有效率A组为87.5%(14/16),B组为70.0%(14/20)。两组3个月生存率均为100%,6个月生存率分别为81.3%和61.6%。12个月生存率分别为31.3%和11.1%。B组Ⅲ、Ⅳ度血液学毒性反应发生率略高于A组,两组相比,差异无显著性。结论 吉西他滨单药以及与顺铂联合一线治疗局部晚期或转移性胰腺癌有一定的客观疗效。可明显改善患者的生活质量。延长了生存时间,患者耐受良好。     

Gemcitabine plus epirubicin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II multicenter trial

The aim of this phase II multicenter trial was to evaluate the activity of a novel combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and epirubicin (EPI) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Clinical benefit and response rate were the main efficacy end-points. From December 1997 to October 1999, 30 consecutive patients with measurable advanced pancreatic cancer were enrolled. Gemcitabine was administered intravenously in 30 min at a dose of 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 followed by i.v. injection of epirubicin 25 mg/m(2); treatment was repeated every 28 days. With regard to clinical benefit response, 8/21 patients (38%) experienced significant palliation of tumor-related symptoms; the median symptom control time was 25 weeks. No complete responses were recorded while 6 patients achieved a partial remission, for an overall response rate of 20%; 10 patients (30%) had a stable disease and 14 (46%) had progressive disease. The median time to progression was 14 weeks. Median survival was 26 weeks, with 6 patients (20%) having long-term survival at 46 weeks. In general, chemotherapy was well tolerated; 9 patients (30%) suffered from WHO grade 3-4 haematological toxicity and 5 patients (16.6%) suffered from grade 3 non-haematological toxicity. In conclusion, the GEM plus EPI regimen represent a feasible approach for improvement of clinical benefit in advanced pancreatic cancer patients, but confirmatory investigations are required.     

吉西他滨联合替吉奥胶囊治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效观察

目的探讨吉西他滨联合替吉奥胶囊化疗方案与吉西他滨单药治疗进展期胰腺癌的疗效。方法对2008年1月至2011年1月收治的52例晚期胰腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,其中28例采用吉西他滨联合替吉奥胶囊方案治疗(A组);24例采用吉西他滨单药治疗(B组)。采用Kaplan-Meier法分析患者的生存时间,并比较两组患者的客观缓解率、临床受益反应(CBR)、中位疾病进展时间、中位生存时间和不良反应。结果 A组有效率明显高于B组(32.1%vs.20.8%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.039)。A组疾病控制率(DCR)高于B组(67.9%vs.45.8%),但差异无统计学意义(P=0.230)。A组患者CBR缓解率高于B组(72.1%vs.46.9%),差异无统计学意义(P=0.41)。A组的中位生存时间为10.2个月(95%CI:8.0～11.8个月),高于B组的8.03个月(95%CI:3.8～10.9个月),差异有统计学意义(P=0.045);A、B两组的中位疾病进展时间分别为3.6个月和3.0个月(P=0.721)。A组的6个月生存率(72.7%)略高于B组(66.8%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组不良反应的发生率也相似(P>0.05)。结论吉西他滨联合替吉奥胶囊治疗方案与单药治疗晚期胰腺癌相比,在客观疗效、中位生存时间表现出一定优势,疾病控制率及临床受益反应也有所提高,且不良反应可耐受,是晚期胰腺癌的有效治疗方案。     

Gemcitabine concurrent with continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced biliary cancers: a review of the Princess Margaret Hospital experience.

BACKGROUND: Unresectable biliary tract cancer has a very poor prognosis. A combination of weekly gemcitabine plus continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (GEM/CVI 5-FU) was evaluated as therapy for this cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The charts of 27 patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma treated with GEM/CVI 5-FU at the Princess Margaret Hospital were evaluated for response, survival and toxicity. The treatment consisted of a 30-min infusion of gemcitabine at 900 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle plus 5-FU given via a peripherally inserted central line at 200 mg/m(2)/day continuously for 21 days, every 28 days. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in nine patients (33%; 95% confidence interval 17% to 54%). An additional eight patients (30%) achieved stable disease for a median of 4 months (range 2.3-11). Median time to progression and overall survival were 3.7 and 5.3 months, respectively. Direct chemotherapy-related toxicity was mild, with only 11% grade > or =3 myelosuppression. Central venous catheter complications were common (26%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that GEM/CVI 5-FU is active and well tolerated in advanced and metastatic biliary tract cancers.     

A combination of a fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine associated to a bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

Background:Laboratory evidences suggest the possibility that aninfusion rate of 10 mg/m²/min may be more effective than thestandard 30-min infusion of Gemcitabine (GEM). Patients and methods:Thirty-four patients with histologicallyverified locally unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma receivedGEM at the dose of 1,500 mg/m² with an infusion rate of 10mg/m²/min, associated to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at the dose of 600mg/m². Both drugs were administered weekly for two consecutiveweeks out of every three weeks. Results:One complete and five partial responses have beenobserved for an overall response rate of 17% (95% CI:3%–27%). The time to progression was 3.7 months with amedian survival of 5.7 months. A clinical benefit was obtained in 5 of 29patients (17%). Grade 3–4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia(35%) and thrombocytopenia (10%). Conclusion:It is unlikely that a fixed dose rate infusion of GEM,at least with this dose, can improve palliation in comparison with thestandard 30-min infusion schedule in advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Phase II study of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine has been reported to be a potent radiosensitiser in human pancreatic cell lines. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of radiotherapy combined with gemcitabine for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In all, 42 patients with pancreatic cancer that was unresectable but confined to the pancreatic region were treated with external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions over 5.5 weeks) and weekly gemcitabine (250 mg m(-2), 30-min infusion). Maintenance gemcitabine (1000 mg m(-2) weekly x 3 every 4 weeks) was initiated 1 month after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy and continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Of the 42 patients, 38 (90%) completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy. The major toxicity was leucopenia and anorexia. There was one death attributed to duodenal bleeding and sepsis. The median survival time was 9.5 months and the 1-year survival rate was 28%. The median progression-free survival time was 4.4 months. In 35 patients with documented disease progression at the time of analysis, 34 (97%) showed distant metastasis as the cause of the initial disease progression. The chemoradiotherapy used in this study has a moderate activity against locally advanced pancreatic cancer and an acceptable toxicity profile. Future investigations for treatment with more systemic effects are warranted.     

Low-dose trimetrexate glucuronate and protracted 5-fluorouracil infusion in previously untreated patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens have not been shown to prolong survival or provide clinical benefit in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The purpose of this study was to determine the tolerability of protracted venous infusion (PVI) of 5-FU, modulated by a low dose of the synthetic antifolate trimetrexate, in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-three chemotherapy-na?ve patients were evaluated. Patients were enrolled in four consecutive cohorts in which the weekly dose of trimetrexate was escalated in 10 mg/m2 increments, from 20 to 50 mg/m2. PVI 5-FU was administered at a fixed dose of 225 mg/m2/day. Treatment was administered for 6 successive weeks, every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were assessable. The maximum tolerated dose of trimetrexate was 40 mg/m2. The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicity was diarrhea. There were no treatment-related deaths. Preliminary analysis of activity revealed a response rate of 9%, with 41% of the patients having stable disease for a median duration of 3.8 months. The median survival for the entire group was 6.9 months (range 1-29 months). A clinical benefit response was experienced by 27.2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose trimetrexate can be safely administered in combination with PVI 5-FU. This treatment is well tolerated and is associated with palliative activity in advanced pancreatic cancer.     

Postoperative adjuvant gemcitabine and concurrent radiation after curative resection of pancreatic head carcinoma: a phase II study

PURPOSE: The addition of radiation to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of pancreatic cancer has not yet shown any definite benefit. Gemcitabine (GEM) has potential activity in advanced pancreatic cancer and is a powerful radiosensitizer. We evaluated the feasibility of postoperative administration of GEM alone, followed by concurrent GEM and irradiation (RT) after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: GEM 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 every 21 days for three courses was given within 8 weeks after surgery and was followed by GEM 300 mg/m(2) weekly +40 Gy in a split course. Twenty-two patients (median age 59 years, range 39-74, Performance Status 0-1) with Stage II and III curatively resected pancreatic head adenocarcinoma were included. RESULTS: For GEM alone, all patients received the three planned courses, with dose reductions in 7 (32%) of 22 patients. All patients, except two, completed full chemoradiation; one received only 20 Gy because of both World Health Organization Grade 4 vomiting and thrombopenia and the other stopped RT after 32 Gy because of early disease progression. No reduction in GEM during RT was necessary; no toxic death was noted; and World Health Organization Grade 3-4 hematologic and nonhematologic toxicities occurred in 8 (36%) and 7 (nausea, vomiting) (32%) of 22 patients respectively. No late toxicity developed. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 11 patients were alive, and 2 patients had died of causes unrelated to their disease or toxicity, The median disease-free survival and overall survival was 6 and 15 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This adjuvant regimen was well tolerated and can be easily administered after curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. Its intensification with continuous RT is currently being investigated.     

A novel biweekly pancreatic cancer treatment schedule with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a common disease considered to be poorly responsive to antiblastic treatment. Recent clinical and preclinical results suggest that a combined treatment of gemcitabine (GEM), 5-flurouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) offers a clinical benefit in patients with advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma. The aim of this phase II clinical trial was to evaluate the antitumour activity and toxicity of a novel biweekly schedule of this combination in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. A total of 42 patients received a 30 min infusion of FA (100 mg m(-2)) and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2)) (FUFA) on days 1-3, and GEM 1000 mg m(-2) on day 1 every 15 days. We observed 13 objective responses (two complete, 11 partial) and 23 stable diseases. The median time to progression was 9.75 months (95% Confidence Interval (CI), 6.88-12.62) and the median overall survival was 13.10 months (95% CI 9.64-16.56). There were seven cases of each grade III gastroenteric and haematological toxicity. The GEM plus FUFA combination appears to be well tolerated and very active in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.     

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil,a randomized controlled study

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM)-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were studied. Eighteen patients were randomized to receive GEM CCRT (600 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks) and 16 patients to receive bolus 5-FU CCRT (500 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 6 weeks). All patients were to receive 3D-CRT 50.4-61.2 Gy at 1.8-Gy/d fractions and GEM (1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks repeated every 4 weeks) after RT. RESULTS: The median survival and median time to progression were 14.5 months and 7.1 months for the GEM CCRT group and 6.7 months and 2.7 months for the 5-FU CCRT group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.019, respectively). The quality-adjusted life month survival time was 11.2 +/- 0.5 months for GEM CCRT and 6.0 +/- 0.3 months for 5-FU CCRT patients (p <0.001). The response rate was 50% (four complete responses and five partial responses) for GEM CCRT and 13% (two partial responses) for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.005). Pain control was 39% for GEM CCRT and 6% for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.043). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (34% vs. 19%), thrombocytopenia (0% vs. 7%), nausea (33% vs. 31%), vomiting (17% vs. 19%), hospitalization days per month of survival (7.4 +/- 1.7 days vs. 8.0 +/- 1.3 days), and full dose of RT received (78% vs. 75%) were not significantly different between the GEM CCRT and 5-FU CCRT patients. CONCLUSION: GEM CCRT appears more effective than 5-FU CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and has comparable tolerability.     

Gemcitabine versus combined chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine hydrochloride (GEM) is a first-line therapeutic agent for advanced pancreatic cancer, but there is no established second-line treatment after GEM failure. We assessed the clinical benefit of systemic combined chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP therapy) in 19 patients compared with GEM in 32 patients, respectively. Tumor response rates were 10.5% and 15.6% for FP therapy and GEM, respectively. The median survival time in the FP therapy and GEM was 137 days and 241 days, respectively. Although clinical benefit was similar in both types of therapy, median survival time was more favorable for GEM, especially for Stage IVb. Nausea and vomiting were the most commonly observed toxicity in the FP therapy group. Our data indicate that FP therapy is not considered to be a useful second-line agent in patients with GEM pretreated pancreatic cancer.     

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and vinorelbine combination therapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II randomized study of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: In a previous phase I study cisplatin (CDDP), gemcitabine (GEM), and vinorelbine (VNR) combination therapy was safe and very active in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was aimed at better defining the activity and toxicity of this regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred eleven chemotherapy-naive patients, age < or = 70 years, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and a performance status of 0 or 1 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) were randomized to two treatment arms. Patients on arm A received CDDP 50 mg/m2, GEM 1,000 mg/m2, and VNR 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of an every-3-weeks cycle (57 patients). Patients on arm B received CDDP 80 mg/m2, epirubicin 80 mg/m2, and vindesine 3 mg/m2, all delivered on day 1 every 4 weeks, plus lonidamine orally 150 mg three times daily (54 patients). In December 1996, randomization was stopped early, and an additional 30 patients were treated with the experimental regimen to obtain a more accurate estimation of its activity rate. RESULTS: Among 87 patients who received the CDDP-GEM-VNR combination, four complete responses (CRs) and 46 partial responses (PRs) were observed, for an overall response rate of 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 68%). Two CRs and 18 PRs were recorded among 54 patients on arm B, giving a 37% activity rate (95% CI , 24% to 51%). After a median follow-up duration of 19 months, the median progression-free and overall survival durations were 32 and 50 weeks in arm A, and 18 and 33 weeks in arm B, respectively. World Health Organization grade 3 to 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 46% and 14% of patients in arm A and in 22% and 11% of those in arm B, respectively. Severe nonhematologic toxicity was uncommon in both arms. CONCLUSION: The CDDP-GEM-VNR combination is a highly effective treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC and has a manageable toxicity. A phase III trial comparing this new combination with both CDDP-VNR and CDDP-GEM regimens is underway.     

A combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

In a randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine (GEM) was more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. GEM and 5-FU have different mechanisms of action and their combination, from a theoretical point of view, could result in a higher activity. To test activity and feasibility of such a combination, a multi-institutional phase II study was initiated in November 1996 by the Italian Group for the study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Primary objectives of this study were to determine the activity in terms of response rate and clinical benefit, while the secondary objective was toxicity. According to the optimal two-stage phase II design, 54 patients were enrolled. Schedule was: GEM 1000 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), and 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) bolus i.v. weekly for 3 weeks out of every 4. All the 54 patients were symptomatic (pain, weight loss, dyspepsia). A clinical benefit was obtained in 28 patients (51%) (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-64%). Two patients achieved a partial response and 34 a stable disease. Median survival for all the patients was 7 months. Side-effects were mild: no gastrointestinal or haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (WHO) were recorded. We observed only six episodes of grade 2 (WHO) leukopenia and seven episodes of thrombocytopenia. Although the non-randomized design of this study suggests caution in the interpretation of these data, in consideration of the low incidence of toxicity and the favourable results obtained in terms of clinical benefit, it may be worthwhile to test more active schedules of 5-FU (continuous infusion) in combination with gemcitabine.