R EVIEW AND S ELF -A SSESSMENT TO A CCOMPANY EMERGENCY MEDICINE

Cardiac arrest in children outside the hospital is associated with high mortality rates. Recent investigations have suggested that the use of advanced life support (ALS) measures by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel may decrease survival. These studies have used the pediatric Utstein style of defining ALS and basic life support (BLS) measures. The pediatric Utstein style defines BLS as “an attempt to restore effective ventilation and circulation” using noninvasive means to open the airway but specifically excludes the use of bag-valve-mask devices. Advanced life support is defined as the “addition of invasive maneuvers to restore effective ventilation and circulation.” The authors of the study described below believe that using this definition would categorize some patients into an ALS group who would otherwise be categorized as having received BLS (i.E., “bag-valve-mask only”). Objective: To compare survival rates among children receiving BLS or ALS following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using amended definitions of prehospital life support measures. Specifically, the definition of BLS was expanded to include the use of bag-valve-mask devices only. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review in an urban, pediatric emergency department. Patients included all children presenting to the emergency department between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1999, following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The main outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Two hundred ten children were identified. Twenty-one patients were excluded from further analysis because of absent or incomplete medical records. One hundred eighty-nine patients were studied. Five children (2.6%) survived to discharge from the hospital. Of 189 children, 39 (20.6%) were provided BLS measures by prehospital personnel; 150 (79.4%) received ALS. There was no significant difference between groups in survival to hospital discharge. Patients who survived to hospital discharge were more likely to be in sinus rhythm upon arrival in the emergency department (p < 0.001) and to have received fewer doses of standard-dose epinephrine in the emergency department (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of ALS by prehospital personnel for children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve survival to discharge from the hospital when compared with the use of BLS.     

Prehospital care and outcome of pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Cardiac arrest in children outside the hospital is associated with high mortality rates. Recent investigations have suggested that the use of advanced life support (ALS) measures by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel may decrease survival. These studies have used the pediatric Utstein style of defining ALS and basic life support (BLS) measures. The pediatric Utstein style defines BLS as “an attempt to restore effective ventilation and circulation” using noninvasive means to open the airway but specifically excludes the use of bag-valve-mask devices. Advanced life support is defined as the “addition of invasive maneuvers to restore effective ventilation and circulation.” The authors of the study described below believe that using this definition would categorize some patients into an ALS group who would otherwise be categorized as having received BLS (i.E., “bag-valve-mask only”). Objective: To compare survival rates among children receiving BLS or ALS following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using amended definitions of prehospital life support measures. Specifically, the definition of BLS was expanded to include the use of bag-valve-mask devices only. Methods: This was a retrospective chart review in an urban, pediatric emergency department. Patients included all children presenting to the emergency department between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1999, following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The main outcome measure was survival to hospital discharge. Results: Two hundred ten children were identified. Twenty-one patients were excluded from further analysis because of absent or incomplete medical records. One hundred eighty-nine patients were studied. Five children (2.6%) survived to discharge from the hospital. Of 189 children, 39 (20.6%) were provided BLS measures by prehospital personnel; 150 (79.4%) received ALS. There was no significant difference between groups in survival to hospital discharge. Patients who survived to hospital discharge were more likely to be in sinus rhythm upon arrival in the emergency department (p < 0.001) and to have received fewer doses of standard-dose epinephrine in the emergency department (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of ALS by prehospital personnel for children with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest did not improve survival to discharge from the hospital when compared with the use of BLS. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE 2002;6:283-290     

Can the full range of paramedic skills improve survival from out of hospital cardiac arrests?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of full implementation of advanced skills by ambulance personnel on the outcome from out of hospital cardiac arrest. SETTING: Patients with cardiac arrest treated at the accident and emergency department of the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. METHODS: All cardiorespiratory arrests occurring in the community were studied over a one year period. For patients arresting before the arrival of an ambulance crew, outcome of 92 patients treated by emergency medical technicians equipped with defibrillators was compared with that of 155 treated by paramedic crews. The proportions of patients whose arrest was witnessed by lay persons and those that had bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) were similar in both groups. RESULTS: There was no difference in the presenting rhythm between the two groups. Eight of the 92 patients (8.7%) treated by technicians survived to discharge compared with eight of 155 (5.2%) treated by paramedics (NS). Of those in ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia, eight of 43 (18.6%) in the technician group and seven of 80 (8.8%) in the paramedic group survived to hospital discharge (NS). For patients arresting in the presence of an ambulance crew, four of 13 patients treated by technicians compared with seven of 15 by paramedics survived to hospital discharge. Only two patients surviving to hospital discharge received drug treatment before the return of spontaneous circulation. CONCLUSIONS: No improvement in survival was demonstrated with more advanced prehospital care.     

Outcomes from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Metropolitan Taipei: Does an advanced life support service make a difference?

BACKGROUND: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is of major medical and public health significance. It also serves as a good indicator in assessing the performance of local emergency medical services system (EMS). There have been arguments for and against the benefits of advanced life support (ALS) over basic life support with defibrillator (BLS-D) for treating OHCA. AIMS OF THE STUDY: The study was conducted to characterise the outcomes of cardiac arrest victims in an Asian metropolitan city; to evaluate the impacts of ALS versus BLS-D services; and to explore the possible patient and arrest factors that may be associated with the observed differences in the outcomes between the two pre-hospital care models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Taipei is an Asian metropolitan city with an area of 272 km(2) and a population of 2.65 million. The fire-based BLS-D EMS system was in the process of phasing in ALS capability. While there were 40 BLS-D teams in the 12 city districts, two ALS teams were set up in the central part of the city. In this prospective study, all adult non-traumatic OHCA from September 2003 to August 2004 were included. Patient, arrest, care, and outcome variables for OHCA victims were collected from prehospital run sheets, automatic defibrillators, and emergency department and hospital records. RESULTS: Among 1423 OHCA included in the analysis, 1037 (73%) received BLS-D service, and 386 (27%) received ALS services. The initial shockable rhythms and early bystander CPR were strongly associated with better survival for victims of cardiac arrests. Compared to BLS-D, ALS patients had similar age, sex, witness status, the rate of bystander CPR, and response timeliness but more patients in asystole (84% versus 72%, p=0.005). Patients treated by ALS were more likely to result in significantly higher rates of return of spontaneous circulation (29% versus 21%; OR=1.51 (95% CI 1.15-2.00); p=0.002) and survival to emergency department/intensive care unit admission (23% versus 15%; OR=1.66 (95% CI 1.22-2.24); p=0.001), but there was no difference in the rate of survival to hospital discharge (7% versus 5%; OR=1.39 (95% CI 0.84-2.23); p=0.17). The outcome difference from ALS services was more pronounced among patients in asystole and without bystander CPR. CONCLUSIONS: In this metropolitan EMS in Asia, the implementation of ALS services improved the intermediate, but not the final outcomes. Communities with larger populations and lower incidence of initial shockable rhythms than the OPALS study should also prioritise their resources in setting up and optimising systems of basic life support and early defibrillations. Further studies are warranted to configure the optimal care model for combating cardiac arrest.     

Derivation and evaluation of a termination of resuscitation clinical prediction rule for advanced life support providers

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to derive a new termination of resuscitation (TOR) clinical prediction rule for advanced life support paramedics (ALS) and to measure both its pronouncement rate and diagnostic test characteristics. Secondary aims included measuring the test characteristics of a previously derived and published basic life support termination of resuscitation (BLS TOR) clinical prediction rule [Morrison LJ, Visentin LM, Kiss A, et al. Validation of a rule for termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2006;355(5):478-87] on the same cohort of patients for comparison purposes. METHODS: Secondary data analysis of adult cardiac arrests treated by ALS in rural and urban EMS systems participating in the OPALS study (data extracted from Phase III). A previous study for a basic life support termination of resuscitation (BLS TOR) clinical prediction rule proposed Termination of Resuscitation if the patient had no return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before transport; no shock administered; EMS personnel did not witness the arrest [Morrison LJ, Visentin LM, Kiss A, et al. Validation of a rule for termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 2006;355(5):478-87]. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between these variables, additional Utstein variables, and the primary outcome of survival to hospital discharge. Diagnostic test characteristics were measured for both the ALS TOR and BLS TOR models on this derivation cohort. RESULTS: Four thousand six hundred and seventy-three cardiac arrest patients were included; 3098 (66%) were male, mean (S.D.) age 69 (15); 239 (5.1%; 95% CI 4.5-5.8) survived to hospital discharge; 3841 patients had no ROSC (82%) and of these only three survived (0.08%; 95% CI 0.02, 0.23). The final ALS TOR model associated with survival, included: ROSC (OR 260.9; 95% CI 96.3, 706.7), bystander witnessed (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.3, 3.1), bystander CPR (OR 2.8; 95% CI 1.9, 4.1), EMS witnessed (OR 12.3; 95% CI 7.1, 21.3) and shock prior to transport (OR 6.4; 95% CI 4.1, 10.1). A new ALS TOR clinical prediction rule based on these variables was 100% sensitive (95% CI 99.9-100) for survival and had 100% negative predictive value (95% CI 99.9-100) for death. Under the ALS TOR clinical prediction rule, 30% of patients would be pronounced in the field. The BLS TOR clinical prediction rule, was 100% sensitive (95% CI 99.9, 100), had 100% negative predictive value (95% CI 99.9-100) and the field pronouncement rate was 48%. CONCLUSION: Cardiac arrest patients may be considered for prehospital ALS TOR when there is no ROSC prior to transport, no shock delivered, no bystander CPR and the arrest was not witnessed by bystanders or EMS. A single EMS termination clinical prediction rule for all levels of providers would be optimal for EMS systems to implement. Prospective evaluation of the ALS TOR clinical prediction rule in the hands of ALS providers will be required before implementation.     

Bystander vs EMS First–responder CPR: Initial Rhythm and Outcome in Witnessed Nonmonitored Out–of–hospital Cardiac Arrest

Objectives: To assess whether outcome and first–monitored rhythm for patients who sustain a witnessed, nonmonitored, out–of–hospital cardiac arrest are associated with on–scene CPR provider group.
Methods: A retrospective, cohort analysis was conducted in a suburban, heterogeneous EMS system. Patients studied were ± 19 years of age, had had an arrest of presumed cardiac origin between July 1989 and January 1993, had gone into cardiac arrest prior to ALS arrival, and had received CPR on collapse. First–monitored rhythms and survival rates were compared for two patient groups who on collapse either: 1) had received CPR by nonprofessional bystanders (BCPR) or 2) had received CPR by on–scene EMS system first responders (FRCPR).
Results: Of 217 cardiac arrest victims, 153 (71%) had received BCPR and 64 (29%) had received FRCPR. The BCPR patients were slightly younger (62. 4 vs 68. 4 years, p = 0. 01) and had slightly shorter ALS response intervals (6. 4 vs 7. 7 minutes, p = 0. 02). There was no difference in BLS response time intervals or automatic external defibrillator (AED) use rates. The percentage of patients with a first–monitored rhythm of pulseless ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) and the percentage of patients grouped by CPR provider who survived to hospital admission or to hospital discharge were:
Controlling for age, the odds ratio for VT/VF with BCPR was 5. 45 (95% CI 2. 8, 10. 3).
Conclusion: Patients who receive BCPR more often have a first–monitored rhythm of VT/VF than do FRCPR patients, despite both CPR–provider groups' initiating CPR essentially immediately after patient collapse. Hence, BCPR and FRCPR groups have different first–monitored arrest rhythms, which may affect survival rate. These patient populations should not be considered to be homogeneous groups in CPR research.     

Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 108 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a controversial issue in emergency medicine practice. This study was conducted to determine whether administration of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-traumatic aetiology improves CPR outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective chart review of 401 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who were resuscitated by the emergency medical services (EMS) during a 6 year period was performed. A total of 108 patients received rt-PA during CPR and were compared to 216 controls, closely matched according to baseline characteristics, arrival status and ECG findings. Administration of rt-PA was optional. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) occurred in 76 patients under rt-PA treatment (70.4 vs. 51.0% in controls; P=0.001). Fifty-two patients from the lysis group survived the first 24 h (48.1 vs. 32.9% in controls; P=0.003), while 27 (25.9%) survived to discharge. Autopsy reports revealed major bleeding complications in six patients receiving rt-PA treatment. Fulminant intracranial haemorrhage was observed in one patient who received rt-PA and in two cases from the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolytic therapy may improve frequency of return of spontaneous circulation substantially and increase primary survival in patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest. Serious bleeding complications are not frequently observed under rt-PA treatment.     

两种不同复苏方法对院前心搏骤停患者初期复苏效果的随机对照研究

目的：比较主动加压减压心肺复苏(ACD—CPR)和标准心肺复苏(CPR)对于院前发生心搏骤停患者的初期复苏效果，探讨ACD—CPR对院前心搏骤停患者的疗效。方法：将在急诊重症监护室(EICU)发生心搏骤停的92例患者按照区组随机的方法分为ACD—CPR组和标准CPR组，比较两组在复苏开始后1、3、5、10、15和30min时的收缩压(SBP)、自主循环恢复率(ROSC)和入院率。结果：ACD—CPR组3、5、10和l5min时SBP均高于标准CPR组(P均＜0．05)。ACD—CPR组思者的ROSC(52．5％)高于标准CPR组(27．8％)，也具有显著的统计学差异(P＜0．05)。ACD—CPR组的收住院率(21．3％)也高于标准CPR组(15．3％)，但无统计学意义。结论：ACD—CPR在改善院前发生的非创伤性心搏骤停患者初期复苏效果方面，优于标准CPR。     

An outcome study of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using the Utstein template--a Japanese experience

Publication of the Utstein style template has made it possible to evaluate and compare national, regional, and hospital based Emergency Medical Services. This research was a national investigation to present outcome data for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in Japan. 3029 OHCA patients who were transported to 10 Emergency and Critical Care Medical Center from November 1997 to April 1999 were recorded according to the Utstein style and the outcome evaluated by logistic regression analysis. Among 3029 OHCA patients, 109 were found dead. The remaining 2920 patients who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by emergency medical technicians (EMT) were included in this study. Among these patients, 1294 were considered of primary cardiac origin patients by the EMT and 722 of these patients suffered a witnessed cardiac arrest. Bystander CPR were performed in 28.4% of these witnessed patients and the discharge rate was 3.5% overall and 11.4% in witnessed VF/VT. Outcome analysis showed that a discharge rate in witnessed primary cardiac arrest was 30% in prehospital resuscitation which was 7.5 times higher than in-hospital emergency room resuscitation groups (4.0%). The longer the interval between an emergency telephone call and defibrillation, the lower the 1 month survival rate, which reached almost 0% at 30 min. Follow up evaluation after discharge revealed that the survival rate rapidly decreased from 24 h to 3 months, then became a plateau in primary cardiac patients was rapidly decreased from 24 h to 1 month, then became a near plateau in non-cardiac origin group. To improve the resuscitation rate in the prehospital phase, a prehospital medical control system should be developed with expansion of on scene techniques by Japanese paramedics such as tracheal intubation, administration of emergency drugs and early defibrillation with standing orders. Education and motivation of first responders will be needed and every effort should be concentrated on improving bystander CPR rate.     

Prompt Advanced Life Support Improves Survival from Ventricular Fibrillation

Objective. To determine whether the interval between the arrival of basic life support (BLS) providers and the arrival of advanced life support (ALS) providers is associated with patient outcome after cardiac arrest. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all witnessed, out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrests between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 2007. Eligible patients (n = 1,781) received full resuscitation efforts from both BLS and ALS providers. Results. The BLS-to-ALS arrival interval was a significant predictor of survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93–0.99); the likelihood of survival decreased by 4% for every minute that ALS arrival was delayed following BLS arrival. Other significant predictors of survival were whether the arrest occurred in public (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.19–1.85), whether a bystander administered cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07–1.68), and the interval between the 9-1-1 call and BLS arrival (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73–0.83). Conclusions. We found that a shorter BLS-to-ALS arrival interval increased the likelihood of survival to hospital discharge after a witnessed, out-of-hospital VF cardiac arrest. We conclude that ALS interventions may provide additional benefits over BLS interventions alone when utilized in a well-established, two-tiered emergency medical services (EMS) system already optimized for rapid defibrillation. The highest priorities in any EMS system should still be early CPR and early defibrillation, but timely ALS services can supplement these crucial interventions.     

One-year survival after prehospital cardiac arrest: The Utstein style applied to a rural-suburban system

To evaluate the recently published Utstein algorithm (Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:861), the authors conducted a retrospective review of all advanced life support (ALS) trip sheets and hospital records of patients with prehospital cardiac arrests between January 1988 and December 1989. Telephone follow-up was used to determine 1-year survival rates. Of 713 arrests in the 24-month study period, 601 were of presumed cardiac etiology. Approximately 599 of these charts were available for analysis. One hundred ninety-three (32.2%) of these had return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 36 (6.0%) survived to hospital discharge, and 24 were alive at 1-year follow-up (4.0% of total or 67% of survivors to discharge). The Utstein style was found to be a useful algorithmic format for reporting prehospital cardiac arrest data in a manner that should allow direct comparison between emergency medical service (EMS) systems. Existing prehospital record-keeping practices (trip sheets) are easily adapted to this style of data collection, although certain data for the template (eg, resuscitations not attempted and alive at 1-year) are more difficult to ascertain. Additionally, the authors report their own experience during a 2-year period, including data that suggest that the majority of patients with cardiac arrest who survive to hospital discharge are still alive at 1 year.     

Comparison of prehospital conventional and simultaneous compression-ventilation cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Nine hundred ninety-four patients were enrolled in a field trial in which ambulance crews were randomly assigned to use simultaneous compression-ventilation (SC-V) CPR or conventional CPR procedures in the prehospital setting. Survival to hospital admission and to discharge was superior in the conventional CPR group vs. the experimental group (p less than .01). In a subset of adult cases whose causes of arrest were nontraumatic, survivor rates still favored the conventional CPR group: 33.5% of 337 vs. 22.5% of 365 (p less than .001). In limited cases where cardiac arrest was due to other heart disease, was vascular in origin or secondary to other natural diseases or from hypertensive cardiovascular disease, or when ECG on arrival was an agonal rhythm, survival was better (but not statistically significantly) in the experimental group. There were no statistically significant differences in the Glasgow coma scores between surviving patients in either group at 24 h post-hospital admission or discharge. It is concluded that survival in the SC-V CPR group was lower, likely reflecting a deleterious effect of the experimental technique of resuscitation. Also noted was that 14% of the control patients and 6% of the experimental patients survived with manual CPR alone.     

院前心脏停搏与院内心脏停搏复苏存活率的比较

目的：分析我院急诊中心心脏停搏患者心肺复苏（CPR）存活率及其影响因素,并比较院前发生心脏停搏与院内发生心脏停搏复苏存活率。方法：对我院急诊中心78例心搏骤停（cardiacarrest,CA）患者的资料进行回顾性分析,比较院前发生心搏骤停组和院内发生心搏骤停组的CPR开始时间（从心脏停搏至CPR开始时间）、气管插管时间、CPR持续时间、开始除颤时间、除颤次数、肾上腺素用量及存活率。结果：院前组复苏存活率2．86％,院内组复苏存活率11．62％。两组CPR开始时间、气管插管时间、存活率比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0．01）,CPR持续时间、除颤次数及肾上腺素用量比较差异无统计学意义。结论：院前心脏停搏较院内心脏停搏复苏存活率低,与“生命链”未彻底落实及急救水平低有关。普及全民急救知识,加强完善急救医疗体系建设,早期除颤及早期亚低温治疗,是提高CPR成功率及复苏存活率的重要措施。     

A pilot randomised trial of thrombolysis in cardiac arrest (The TICA trial)

INTRODUCTION: The outcome after out of hospital cardiac arrest is dismal. Thrombolysis during CPR has been advocated. Our hypothesis was that early administration of bolus thrombolysis could lead to improved survival from out of hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: A prospective, randomised, double blind placebo controlled trial. All victims of out of hospital cardiac arrest brought to the Emergency Department (ED) by the emergency medical system were eligible for inclusion. All patients received standard advanced cardiac life support, except that the first drug the patient received was either tenecteplase 50 mg or placebo. The primary end point was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). RESULTS: Of 35 patients enrolled, 19 received tenecteplase and 16 placebo. The tenecteplase group was younger (63 vs 72 years P = 0.04) and had significantly more ventricular fibrillation as the initial rhythm (63% versus 19%, 44% difference, 95% CI 15-73%). There was no difference in rhythm on arrival at the ED. ROSC occurred in 8 (42%) patients receiving tenecteplase and one (6%) placebo (36% difference, 95% CI 11-61%). Two tenecteplase and one placebo patient survived to leave ED, and one in each group survived to hospital discharge. Autopsy results were available on eight patients, five of whom had a thrombotic cause of death. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, we found the use of early bolus tenecteplase for OHCA to be feasible, and that it appears to increase the rate of ROSC. Larger studies are required to determine if this translates into a survival benefit. Appropriate patient selection for OHCA studies remains problematic.     

The feasibility of a regional cardiac arrest receiving system

BACKGROUND: Patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) are generally transported to the closest ED, presumably to expedite a hospital level of care and improve the chances of return for spontaneous circulation (ROSC) or provide post-resuscitative care for patients with prehospital ROSC. As hospital-based therapies for survivors of OOHCA are identified, such as hypothermia and emergency primary coronary interventions (PCI), certain hospitals may be designated as cardiac arrest receiving facilities. The safety of bypassing non-designated facilities with such a regional system is not known. OBJECTIVES: To explore the potential ED contribution in OOHCA victims without prehospital ROSC and document the relationship between transport time and outcome in patients with prehospital ROSC. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study conducted in a large, urban EMS system over an 18-month period. Data were collected using the Utstein template for OOHCA. The incidence of prehospital ROSC was calculated for patients who were declared dead on scene, transported but died in the ED, died in the hospital, and survived to hospital discharge. The relationship between transport time and survival was also explored for patients with prehospital ROSC. RESULTS: A total of 1141 cardiac arrest patients were enrolled over the 18-month period. A strong association between prehospital ROSC and final disposition was observed (chi-square test for trend p<0.001). Only two patients who survived to hospital discharge did not have prehospital ROSC. Mean transport times were not significantly different for patients with prehospital ROSC who were declared dead in the ED (8.3min), died following hospital admission (7.8min), and survived to hospital discharge (8.5min). Outcomes in patients with prehospital ROSC who had shorter (7min or less) versus longer transport times were similar, and receiver-operator curve analysis indicated no predictive ability of transport time with regard to survival to hospital admission (area under the curve=0.52). CONCLUSIONS: In this primarily urban EMS system, the vast majority of survivors from OOHCA are resuscitated in the field. A relationship between transport time and survival to hospital admission or discharge was not observed. This supports the feasibility of developing a regional cardiac arrest system with designated receiving facilities.     

Improved Survival from Cardiac Arrest in the Community

We now know that the elements required to achieve the highest survival rates from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest include: witnessed arrest, rapid telephone notification of the emergency medical service, early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, rapid arrival within minutes of emergency personnel equipped with a defibrillator, and early advanced airway management and intravenous pharmacology. In the United States, and in several other countries innovative approaches have been tried to bring all these elements together in one system. These approaches include community-wide CPR training programs, telephone-assisted CPR instruction delivered at the time of a cardiac arrest, early defibrillation performed by family members of high risk patients, early defibrillation performed by minimally trained community responders, and early defibrillation performed by minimally trained ambulance personnel. Controlled, prospective studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and practicality of all of these approaches. New studies are in progress with the prehospital use of early transcutaneous cardiac pacing and these show promise. This article reviews the evidence that supports these multi-layered and innovative approaches to the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.     

心脏骤停患者心肺复苏抢救中的影响因素分析

目的 探讨心脏骤停患者心肺复苏抢救中的影响因素。方法 回顾性收集2015年9月-2018年9月急救中心收治的304例成年心脏骤停患者的临床数据,包括患者基本人口学信息、现场心肺复苏(cardio-pulmonary resuscitaion,CPR)情况[包括是否有目击者、目击者是否实施CPR、胸部按压分数(chest compression fraction,CCF)、到达急救中心时间等],患者24 h的存活率,采用单因素分析和Logistic回归分析研究心脏骤停患者CPR后24 h存活率的影响因素。结果 单因素分析发现,目击者是否进行CPR及接受不同CCF的患者,其24 h存活率比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05);Logistic回归分析显示,CCF≤80%为24 h存活率的危险因素(P＜0.05),目击者进行CPR为24 h存活率的保护因素(P＜0.05)。结论 对心脏骤停患者,目击者尽早实施CPR及增加有效持续胸部按压时间,能够提高心脏骤停患者心肺复苏后的24 h存活率。     

The three-phase model of cardiac arrest as applied to ventricular fibrillation in a large, urban emergency medical services system

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, with consistently poor outcomes despite the rapid availability of prehospital personnel for defibrillation attempts in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF). Recent evidence suggests a period of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prior to defibrillation attempts may improve outcomes in patients with moderate time since collapse (4-10 min). OBJECTIVES: To determine cardiac arrest outcomes in our community and explore the relationship between time since collapse, performance of bystander CPR, and survival. METHODS: Non-traumatic cardiac arrest data were collected prospectively over an 18-month period. Patients were excluded for: age <18 years, a "Do Not Attempt Resuscitation" (DNAR) directive, determination of a non-cardiac etiology for arrest, and an initially recorded rhythm other than VF. Patients were stratified by time since collapse (<4, 4-10, > 10 min, and unknown) and compared with regard to survival and neurological outcome. In addition, patients with and without bystander CPR were compared with regard to survival. RESULTS:: A total of 1141 adult non-traumatic cardiac arrest victims were identified over the 18-month study period. This included 272 patients with VF as the initially recorded rhythm. Of these, 185 had a suspected cardiac etiology for the arrest; survival to hospital discharge was 15% in this group, with 82% of these having a good outcome or only moderate disability. Survival was highest among patients with time since collapse of less than 4 min and decreased with increasing time since collapse. There were no survivors among patients with time since collapse greater than 10 min. Among patients with time since collapse of 4 min or longer, survival was significantly higher with the performance of bystander CPR; there was no survival advantage to bystander CPR among patients with time since collapse less than 4 min. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of bystander CPR prior to defibrillation by EMS personnel is associated with improved survival among patients with time since collapse longer than 4 min but not less than 4 min. These data are consistent with the three-phase model of cardiac arrest.     

Survival of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with early initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Records on 1,297 people with witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, caused by heart disease and treated by both emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics, were examined to determine whether or not early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiated by bystanders independently improved survival. Bystanders initiated CPR for 579 patients (bystander CPR); for the remaining 718 patients, CPR was delayed until the arrival of EMTs (delayed CPR). Survival was significantly better (P less than 0.05) in the bystander-CPR group (32%) than in the delayed-CPR group (22%). Multivariate analysis revealed that the superior survival in the bystander-CPR group was due almost entirely to the much earlier initiation of CPR (1.9 minutes for the Bystander-CPR group and 5.7 minutes for the delayed-CPR group; P less than 0.001). There were significantly more people with ventricular fibrillation (VF) in the bystander-CPR group (80%) than in the delayed-CPR group (68%); and, for people in VF, the survival rate was significantly better if they had received bystander-CPR (37% versus 29%). The authors conclude that early initiation of CPR by bystanders significantly improves survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, and they suggest that it may do so by prolonging the duration of VF after collapse and by increasing cardiac susceptibility to defibrillation. The benefit of this early CPR, however, appears to exist within a rather narrow window of effectiveness. It must be started within 4-6 minutes from the time of collapse and must be followed within 10-12 minutes of the collapse by advanced life support in order to be effective.     

Cardiac arrest – cardiopulmonary resuscitation

ObjectiveTo investigate application of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) measures within the golden minutes in Europe.MethodsThe material was taken from the University Clinical Center of Kosovo – Emergency Centre in Pristina, during the two (2) year period (2010–2011). The collected date belong to the patients with cardiac arrest have been recorded in the patients' log book protocol at the emergency clinic.ResultsDuring the 2010 to 2011 in the emergency center of the CUCK in Pristina have been treated a total of 269 patients with cardiac arrest, of whom 159 or 59.1% have been treated in 2010, and 110 patients or 40.9% in 2011. Of the 269 patients treated in the emergency centre, 93 or 34.6% have exited lethally in the emergency centre, and 176 or 65.4% have been transferred to other clinics. In the total number of patients with cardiac arrest, males have dominated with 186 cases, or 69.1%. The average age of patients included in the survey was 56.7 year old SD ± 16.0 years. Of the 269 patients with cardiac arrest, defibrillation has been applied for 93 or 34.6% of patients. In the outpatient settings defibrillation has been applied for 3 or 3.2% of patients. Patients were defibrillated with application of one to four shocks. Of 27 cases with who have survived cardiac arrest, none of them have suffered cardiac arrest at home, 3 or 11.1% of them have suffered cardiac arrest on the street, and 24 or 88.9% of them have suffered cardiac arrest in the hospital. 5 out of 27 patients survived have ended with neurological impairment. Cardiac arrest cases were present during all days of the week, but frequently most reported cases have been on Monday with 32.0% of cases, and on Friday with 24.5% of cases.ConclusionsAll survivors from cardiac arrest have received appropriate medical assistance within 10 min from attack, which implies that if cardiac arrest occurs near an institution health care (with an opportunity to provide the emergent health care) the rate of survival is higher.