Early Carotid Endarterectomy after a Nondisabling Stroke: A Prospective Study

On the recommendation of several studies, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) should be delayed for at least 6 weeks in patients suffering an acute nondisabling stroke. Our objective was to determine if these patients could be safely operated on earlier, thus decreasing the risk of a recurrent stroke prior to surgery. This prospective study, carried out from January 1990 to December 1997, included 72 consecutive patients having a nondisabling hemispheric stroke with severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis (NASCET 70-99%). All patients underwent CEA within 15 days of stroke onset. Patients were considered to have a nondisabling hemispheric stroke if (1) symptoms of hemispheric ischemia persisted longer than 24 hr and (2) the resulting deficit caused no major impairment in their everyday activities. All patients were examined by a neurologist prior to carotid angiography and contrast CT scan. Hemorrhage seen on the initial CT scan eliminated the patient from the study. If the CT scan with contrast injection was negative, patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging. CEA was performed under general anesthesia with intraluminal shunting. All patients had a postoperative duplex scan and yearly follow-up by a neurologist and a surgeon, with a duplex scan of the carotid arteries. Mean follow-up was 53 months. Our study shows that CEA can be performed relatively safely within 15 days following an acute nondisabling stroke. The arbitrary 6-week delay for CEA may unnecessarily expose patients with high-grade stenosis to a recurrent stroke, which could be prevented by earlier surgery.     

Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic,but “Haemodynamically Insignificant” Carotid Stenosis

ObjectiveCarotid endarterectomy (CEA) guidelines in symptomatic carotid stenosis are based on NASCET and ECST criteria with 70% or greater carotid stenosis as estimated from a catheter angiogram the major indication. This has several problems: (1) lack of reliable correlation between non-invasive imaging and catheter angiography, which has been largely superseded by non-invasive imaging in investigating carotid stenosis; (2) errors inherent in estimating the degree of stenosis from catheter angiography; (3) disregard for the fact that stroke risk also depends on plaque stability, and number of ischaemic events.MethodsA retrospective review of ischaemic events, imaging results, operative findings, surgical complications and stroke-free follow-up in 31 patients presenting over a 23 year period with TIA/stroke (symptoms lasting > 24 h and/or imaging evidence of infarction) who had 70% or less carotid stenosis (on non-invasive imaging), but nonetheless underwent CEA.ResultsNineteen patients had small strokes, 7 had TIAs and 5 had ocular events; 28 patients had features of unstable plaque on imaging; 19 patients experienced multiple events before CEA. All had haemorrhagic, ruptured plaque at CEA. One patient suffered an intra-operative stroke, only 1 patient suffered a further stroke/TIA (mean follow-up 4.2 years).ConclusionTo predict the likelihood of major stroke in symptomatic carotid stenosis and the benefit of CEA, plaque stability and the number of ischaemic events might be as important as an estimate of the degree of stenosis.     

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: Early results and late outcome

Purpose: This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the octogenarian population at the Cleveland Clinic. Methods: From 1989 to 1995, 182 CEAs were performed among 167 octogenarians (98 men, 69 women) with a mean age of 83 years (median, 83 years; range, 80 to 93 years). One hundred procedures (55%) were performed for severe asymptomatic stenosis, whereas 48 (26%) were performed for hemispheric transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or amaurosis fugax, 24 (13%) for prior stroke, and 10 (5%) for vertebrobasilar symptoms. Thirteen CEAs (7%) were combined with myocardial revascularization, and another five (3%) represented carotid reoperations. Nine arteriotomies (5%) were closed primarily, whereas the remaining 173 (95%) were repaired using either vein patch angioplasty (141, 77%) or synthetic patches (32, 18%). Two patients were lost to follow-up, but late information was available for 165 patients (180 operations) at a mean interval of 2.7 years (median, 2.4 years; maximum, 7.4 years). Results: Considering all 182 procedures, there were five early (<30 days) postoperative neurologic events (2.7%), including three strokes (1.6%) and two TIAs (1.1%). An additional 15 neurologic events occurred during the late follow-up period, consisting of 11 strokes (6.1%) and four TIAs (2.2%). The Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year rate of freedom from stroke was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 93%). There was one early postoperative death (0.6%) of cardiac complications 9 days after CEA. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 45% (95% CI, 33% to 57%), and the 5-year stroke-free survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 30% to 53%). Multivariable analysis yielded age at operation (p = 0.001), abnormal creatinine level (p = 0.025), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.019) as variables that significantly influenced the survival rate. The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.009) and, surprisingly, a lesser degree of contralateral internal carotid stenosis (p = 0.003) were found to be significantly associated with stroke after CEA. Causes of late death were cardiovascular in 16 patients (30%), unknown in 13 (24%), carcinoma in six (11%), stroke in six (11%), and miscellaneous in 13 (24%). Conclusions: We conclude that CEA may be safely performed in selected octogenarians with carotid stenosis, and that the majority of these patients live the rest of their lives free from stroke. Therefore, age alone should not exclude otherwise-qualified candidates from consideration for CEA. (J Vasc Surg 1998;27:860-71.)     

Early carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients is associated with poorer perioperative outcomes

OBJECTIVE: The optimal timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after ipsilateral hemispheric stroke is controversial. Although early studies suggested that an interval of about 6 weeks after a completed stroke was preferred, more recent data have suggested that delaying CEA for this period of time is not necessary. With these issues in mind, we reviewed our experience to examine perioperative outcome with respect to the timing of CEA in previously symptomatic patients. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of all CEAs performed at our institution from 1992 to 2003 showed that 2537 CEA were performed, of which 1,158 (45.6%) were in symptomatic patients. Patients who were operated on emergently 18 months), and these were excluded from further analysis. Of the remaining 1,046 cases, 62.7% had TIAs and 37.3% had completed strokes as their indication for surgery. Among the entire cohort, patients who underwent early CEA were significantly more likely to experience a perioperative stroke than patients who underwent delayed CEA (5.1% vs 1.6%, P = .002). Patients with TIAs alone were more likely to be operated on early rather than in a delayed fashion (64.3% vs 46.7%, P < .0001), likely reflecting institutional bias in selecting delayed CEA for stroke patients. However, even when examined as two separate groups, both TIA patients (n = 656) and CVA patients (n = 390) were significantly more likely to experience a perioperative stroke when operated upon early rather than in a delayed fashion (TIA patients, 3.3% vs 0.9%, P = .05; CVA patients, 9.4% vs 2.4%, P = .003). There were no significant differences in demographics or other meaningful variables between patients who underwent early CEA and those who underwent delayed CEA. CONCLUSIONS: In a large institutional experience, patients who underwent CEA 相似文献   

Carotid endarterectomy before and after publication of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: In 1991, the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) demonstrated that carotid endarterectomy (CEA), in addition to best medical therapy, significantly reduces ipsilateral stroke in patients with high-grade (70 per cent or more) carotid artery stenosis compared with best medical therapy alone. In 1995, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study demonstrated that CEA was of benefit in asymptomatic patients with stenosis greater than 60 per cent. The aim of this paper was to examine how the practice and outcome of CEA have changed since publication of these data. METHODS: A prospectively gathered computerized database comprising 634 consecutive CEAs was studied. Two time intervals were analysed: 1975-1991 inclusive (17 years) and 1 January 1992 to 1 May 1998 (6 years 4 months). RESULTS: Since 1991, there has been a fourfold increase in the number of CEAs performed annually for symptomatic disease. CEA is now performed almost exclusively for high-grade (more than 70 per cent) stenosis. There has been a significant reduction in the total peri-operative neurological event rate (12.5 versus 5.9 per cent, P < 0.05), and the 30-day combined major stroke (Rankin grade 3-5) and mortality rate has fallen to 2.0 per cent. The number of patients who have CEA for asymptomatic disease remains small with 16 of 30 being randomized within the Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial. CONCLUSION: Publication of ECST and NASCET data has been associated with a major increase in the number of CEAs performed for symptomatic disease in this unit. Despite a greater proportion of high-risk patients, the results have improved progressively.     

Cerebral tomographic findings in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: short-term and long-term implications

Purpose: Preoperative cerebral imaging has been considered not to be cost-effective in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Yet, silent brain infarction (SBI) has been associated with the embolization potential of a severe carotid stenosis. Thus the presence of SBI may represent an additional indication for CEA in asymptomatic patients. We examined the predictive value of preoperatively detected silent cerebral lesions on early and late outcomes in patients undergoing CEA for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Methods: Preoperative cerebral tomographic (CT) scans performed on 301 asymptomatic patients undergoing 346 CEAs from 1986 to 1995 were reviewed by a single neuroradiologist blinded to patients' records. Mean follow-up was 67.3 months (range, 24-130 months). The degree of internal carotid lumen reduction was measured bilaterally in all patients (602 carotid arteries); carotid stenosis of 60% or more was found in 399 carotid arteries. Results: Of the 103 (34%) CT scans positive for cerebral lesions, 58% were lacunar. No significant association was observed between the side of the cerebral lesion on CT scan and the severity of the corresponding carotid stenosis; 38 silent lesions were detected in the 203 hemispheres ipsilateral to carotid stenoses that were less than 60% versus 95 SBIs in the 399 hemispheres ipsilateral to carotid stenoses that were 60% or more (19% vs 24%; P = .2). There were no significant differences in the perioperative stroke/death rate in patients with or without cerebral CT lesions (2% vs 1%; odds ratio, 1.94; P = .6). Mortality rate during follow-up was 22% in patients with preoperative SBI and 15% in patients without SBI (P = .1). However, actuarial survival at 10 years was shorter (P = .02) in patients with SBI. Late stroke occurred in 11% of patients with preoperative SBI and in 3% of patients without preoperative SBI (P = .006). Cox regression analysis showed that both preoperative lacunar and nonlacunar infarctions were independent predictors of late stroke (hazard ratio, 3.6; P = .04; and hazard ratio, 7.1; P = .001; respectively). Conclusion: In our experience, preoperative SBI did not occur more frequently in the hemisphere ipsilateral to asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Although our study lacks a medically treated control group, our data show that SBI is predictive of poor neurologic outcome in asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA. We conclude that CT before CEA, selectively applied, provides information on long-term neurologic prognosis and that a less aggressive attitude towards CEA in asymptomatic patients with SBI may be justified. (J Vasc Surg 1999;29:995-1005.)     

Carotid endarterectomy in patients less than 50 years old

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in a young population with premature atherosclerosis with the results of an older control group, examining perioperative morbidity and mortality data, recurrent stenosis and symptoms, late stroke, and survival data.Methods: We retrospectively studied 26 patients less than 50 years old (mean, 43.2 ± 3.8 years) and 30 patients greater than 55 years old (mean, 69.1 ± 7.4 years) who underwent CEA during the same time period. Data were obtained regarding demographics, atherosclerotic risk factors, indication for CEA, perioperative complications, recurrent stenosis and symptoms, late stroke, and survival.Results: Smoking was more prevalent among young patients who underwent CEA (92% vs 70%; p = 0.036). Young patients were also more likely to be symptomatic at presentation (92% vs 57%; p = 0.003). The perioperative mortality rate (0% vs 0%) and neurologic morbidity rate (0% vs 3%; p = 1.000) were low for the study patients. During a mean follow-up of 67 ± 42.7 months, there was no significant difference in survival rate (5-year survival rate, 93% vs 81%; p = 0.373), rate of late ipsilateral (4% vs 3%) and contralateral (4% vs 3%) stroke, restenosis and occlusion (26.9% vs 14.3%), recurrent symptoms (22% vs 17%), reoperation (11.5% vs 5.7%), or contralateral disease (17% vs 23%) development that required surgery for the study or the control cohorts.Conclusions: Our data show that there is a high incidence of smoking and symptomatic presentation among young patients in whom carotid occlusive disease develops. CEA may be performed in young patients with low perioperative morbidity and mortality rates. Recurrent disease, late stroke, and survival rates are not significantly different than for older patients. Follow-up with serial duplex ultrasound and reoperation for symptomatic and high-grade asymptomatic restenosis may decrease the risk of late stroke.     

Durability of surgery for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND: The role of carotid surgery for the management of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is challenged by carotid artery stenting (CAS). We reviewed redo CEA in a consecutive series of patients to determine the safety, durability, and long-term benefit associated with repeat surgical treatment for restenosis. METHODS: A consecutive series of 73 redo procedures in 72 patients (57% men) with a mean age 66 years (range, 49-81 years) was analyzed. The mean interval between prior CEA and redo CEA was 53 months (range, 8-192 months). Operative indications included symptomatic restenosis in 28 patients (38%). A patch angioplasty was performed in 62 patients (85%). The main outcome measures included perioperative and late stroke and death, and the development of secondary restenosis. RESULTS: There were no perioperative deaths or strokes. During a mean follow-up of 52 months (range, 12-144 months), the Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival was 85% at 5 years. At 5 years, the cumulative rate of freedom from all strokes was 98%, and the freedom from ipsilateral stroke was 100%. After secondary procedures, re-recurrent stenosis > or =50% occurred in 10 patients (13.7%). The cumulative freedom from re-restenosis (> or =50%) was 85% at 5 years. Five patients (7%) received tertiary carotid reconstructions. CONCLUSION: Repeat CEA for recurrent stenosis can be performed safely with excellent long-term protection from stroke. These data provide a standard against which the results of CAS can be compared.     

Is carotid endarterectomy cost-effective in symptomatic patients with moderate (50% to 69%) stenosis?

OBJECTIVE: Recently published data from the North American Carotid Endarterectomy Trial revealed a benefit for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in symptomatic patients with moderate (50% to 69%) carotid stenosis. This benefit was significant but small (absolute stroke risk reduction at 5 years, 6.5%; 22.2% vs 15.7%), and thus, the authors of this study were tentative in the recommendation of operation for these patients. To better elucidate whether CEA in symptomatic patients with moderate carotid stenosis is a proper allocation of societal resources, we examined the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. METHODS: A decision-analytic Markov process model was constructed to determine the cost-effectiveness of CEA versus medical treatment for a hypothetical cohort of 66-year-old patients with moderate carotid stenosis. This model allowed the comparison of not only the immediate hospitalization but also the lifetime costs and benefits of these two strategies. Our measure of outcome was the cost-effectiveness ratio (CER), defined as the incremental lifetime cost per quality-adjusted life year saved. We assumed an operative stroke and death rate of 6.6% and a declining risk of ipsilateral stroke after the ischemic event with medical treatment (first year, 9.3%; second year, 4%; subsequent years, 3%). The hospitalization cost of CEA ($6,420) and the annual costs of major stroke ($26,880), minor stroke ($798), and aspirin therapy ($63) were estimated from a hospital cost accounting system and the literature. RESULTS: CEA for moderate carotid stenosis increased the survival rate by 0.13 quality-adjusted life years as compared with medical treatment at an additional lifetime cost of $580. Thus, CEA was cost-effective with a CER of $4,462. Society is usually willing to pay for interventions with CERs of less than $60,000 (eg, CERs for coronary artery bypass grafting at $9,100 and for dialysis at $53,000). CEA was not cost-effective if the perioperative risk was greater than 11.3%, if the ipsilateral stroke rate associated with medical treatment at 1 year was reduced to 4.3%, if the age of the patient exceeded 83 years, or if the cost of CEA exceeded $13,200. CONCLUSION: CEA in patients with symptomatic moderate carotid stenosis of 50% to 69% is cost-effective. Perioperative risk of stroke or death, medical and surgical stroke risk, cost of CEA, and age are important determinants of the cost-effectiveness of this intervention.     

Long-term results of 442 consecutive, standardized carotid endarterectomy procedures in standard-risk and high-risk patients

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine the results of a specific technique in the performance of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and to compare results using this technique between standard-risk and high-risk patients eligible for Stenting and Angioplasty with Protection in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy (SAPPHIRE) and between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. METHODS: A total of 391 patients underwent 442 consecutive CEA procedures under general anesthesia with the intent to shunt, patch, and perform intraoperative completion duplex ultrasound imaging. Indications included 272 asymptomatic patients (61.5%) with carotid stenoses > or =60% and 170 symptomatic patients (38.5%) with carotid stenosis > or =50%. Data were analyzed to determine the early (< or =30 days) and long-term morbidity and mortality overall in standard-risk and high-risk procedures and in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. The primary end points were the occurrence of all strokes or death or myocardial infarction (MI) in the first 30 postoperative days (100% follow-up) and the occurrence by life-table analysis of ipsilateral stroke or death or MI (SDMI) out to 93 months (mean, 31.4 months). RESULTS: A total of 441 (99.7%) procedures included shunting, 440 (99.5%) included patching, and 442 (100%) had completion duplex ultrasound imaging. Of these, 235 procedures were standard risk and 207 procedures were high risk. At the 30-day follow-up, there were two ipsilateral central neurologic deficits (1 major stroke, 1 minor stroke), no death, and one MI (0.45% for all strokes or death; 0.68% for all strokes or death or MI). After 30 days of follow-up, an additional 16 strokes (9 ipsilateral, 7 contralateral), eight MIs, and 38 deaths had occurred. No statistically significant difference was found between standard-risk and high-risk groups or between asymptomatic and symptomatic groups for stroke, death, MI, stroke or death, or stroke or death or MI at 30 days or during long-term follow-up at any interval up to 93 months. CONCLUSION: CEA performed with intent to treat using general anesthesia, shunting, patching, and completion duplex scanning results in extremely low 30-day and long-term morbidity and mortality in asymptomatic, symptomatic, standard-risk and high-risk patients. These results are substantially superior to those reported in carotid stenting trials for both carotid stenting and CEA and do not support the contention that there is a high-risk group for CEA.     

Carotid artery angioplasty and use of stents in high-risk patients with contralateral occlusions.

OBJECT: The risks associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are increased in the presence of contralateral carotid artery (CA) occlusion. The 30-day stroke and death rate for patients in the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) who had contralateral CA occlusion was 14.3%. The authors analyze their experience with angioplasty and/or stent placement in patients with contralateral CA occlusion to determine the safety and efficacy of endoluminal revascularization in this subgroup. METHODS: Twenty-six procedures were evaluated in 23 patients with high-grade CA stenosis and contralateral CA occlusion. The first 15 procedures were evaluated retrospectively, and the next 11 prospectively. All patients had severe medical comorbidities and were considered too high risk for CEA, even without considering the contralateral occlusion. Clinical follow-up review was performed an average of 18 months later (median 15 months). CONCLUSIONS: The average ipsilateral CA stenosis according to NASCET criteria was 78% preprocedure and 5% postprocedure. There were no changes in neurological or functional outcome immediately postoperatively in any patient. The 30-day postoperative stroke and death rates were zero. However, there was one symptomatic femoral hematoma that resolved without surgery. At follow up, there were three patients who had suffered stroke or death. One patient died secondary to respiratory arrest at 2 months; one died secondary to prostate carcinoma at 12 months; and one patient experienced a minor stroke contralateral to the treated artery at 41 months. Despite the substantial preoperative risk factors in patients in this series, the 30-day stroke and death rate for angioplasty and/or stent placement appears to be lower than that of CEA in patients with contralateral occlusions.     

Combined carotid and coronary revascularization: the preferred approach to the severe vasculopath.

The timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and coronary revascularization (CABG) for concomitant disease is controversial. Results of combined CEA/CABG in 127 patients (age range, 46 to 82 years; mean age, 65 years; 61% male) from 1978 to 1991 were reviewed. Ninety-five patients (75%) were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, 48 (38%) had left main coronary artery disease, and 32 (28%) had depressed ejection fraction ( < 0.50). Forty (32%) had asymptomatic bruits, 61 (48%) transient ischemic attacks, and 26 (20%) prior strokes. Seventy-five (59%) had bilateral carotid stenosis, including 20 (16%) with contralateral occlusions. Perioperative mortality was 7 of 127 (5.5%), and all deaths were cardiac related. Myocardial infarctions occurred in 6 of 127 patients (4.7%) and were nonfatal in 3 (2.3%). Permanent strokes occurred in 7 of 127 (5.5%) and were ipsilateral in 5 (3.9%). Perioperative stroke did not occur in the asymptomatic group, but the risk was higher in those with prior stroke (19%) or with contralateral carotid occlusion (15%). The stroke risk for our patients with carotid disease having CABG without CEA is not known, but the literature reports rates as high as 14%. For our patients without known concomitant disease, the risk of permanent stroke was 1.0% (31/3012) for isolated CABG and 1.5% (7/482) for isolated CEA. The late results after CEA/CABG revealed a 5-year survival of 70% +/- 5%, which correlated with ejection fraction ( > or = 0.50, 81% +/- 5%; < 0.50, 45% +/- 11%; p < 0.003). Freedom from late permanent ipsilateral stroke was 97% +/- 2% at 8 years. Freedom from stroke at 5 years was lower among patients with a previous stroke (71% +/- 10%) compared with transiently symptomatic (90% +/- 4%) and asymptomatic (96% +/- 4%) patients (p < 0.03). Combined CEA/CABG is a useful option in this high-risk group of patients with extensive atherosclerosis; avoids a subsequent hospitalization, anesthetic, and delay period; and provides long-term protection from ipsilateral stroke.     

CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST) contrasts the relative efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid angioplasty-stent (CAS) in preventing primary outcomes of stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during a 30-day periprocedural period, or ipsilateral stroke over the follow-up period extending up to 4 years. Stroke events will be verified by an Adjudication Committee masked to the assigned treatment. The primary eligibility criterion is a significant (> or =50%) stenosis of the carotid artery in patients with transient ischemic attack or ipsilateral nondisabling stroke within the prior 180 days. Men and women will be eligible for the trial, but patients with medical conditions likely to limit their participation during the follow-up or to interfere with outcome evaluation will be excluded. After a credentialing and training phase, 2,500 patients will be randomized to the treatments. Statistical analysis of the primary outcome will employ standard survival techniques and will result in 90% power to detect annual differences between groups of 1.2% or higher in event rates of the primary outcomes.     

Preoperative risk factors for carotid endarterectomy: defining the patient at high risk

PURPOSE: The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for prevention of stroke has been demonstrated in randomized trials; however, the optimal approach in patients excluded from these trials or who have other significant comorbid conditions remains controversial, particularly with the advent of percutaneous interventions. We examined the influence of putative risk factors on outcome of CEA in a single-center experience. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 1370 consecutive CEA performed from 1990 to 1999 was undertaken. Preoperative risk factors examined included age older than 80 years, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure (serum creatinine concentration > 2.0 mg/dL), contralateral carotid artery occlusion, recurrent ipsilateral carotid artery stenosis, ipsilateral hemispheric symptoms within 6 weeks, and recent coronary bypass grafting (CABG). The Fisher exact test was used to identify baseline variables associated with perioperative (30 days) risk for stroke or death. Multivariate analysis with Poisson regression was used to study the effect of all univariate criteria in combination. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, there were 32 adverse events (2.3%), including 11 deaths (0.8%), 6 disabling strokes (0.4%), and 10 nondisabling strokes (0.7%). There was no significant difference in incidence of perioperative stroke or death between patients with one or more risk factors (n = 689) and those with no risk factors (low risk, n = 681). Thirty-day mortality was significantly greater in patients with two or more risk factors compared with patients with no risk factors (2.8% vs 0.3%; P =.04), but no significant difference was noted in perioperative stroke rate (2.3% vs 1.0%). Univariate analysis demonstrated that contralateral carotid occlusion (n = 75) was the only significant predictor of adverse outcome (5 events, 6.7%) among the variables tested; this was confirmed with multivariate analysis (relative risk, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-12.3; P =.01). Five-year survival for patients with two or more risk factors was notably diminished compared with that for patients with no risk factors (38.7% +/- 5.9% vs 75.0% +/- 2.6%; P <.001). Contralateral occlusion was also associated with reduced 5-year survival (38 +/- 11% vs 67 +/- 2%; P <.004). CONCLUSION: CEA can be safely performed in patients deemed at high risk, including those aged 80 years or older and others with significant comorbid conditions, with combined stroke and mortality rates comparable to those found in randomized trials, ie, the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Contralateral occlusion may be a predictor for moderately increased perioperative risk and for reduced long-term survival. Caution may be warranted in asymptomatic patients with multiple risk factors, in whom presumed long-term benefit of CEA may be compromised by markedly reduced 5-year survival.     

Contemporary outcomes for carotid endarterectomy at a large community-based academic health center

The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) demonstrated the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA), but these studies were published 15 and 11 years ago, respectively. We hypothesized that present clinical results of CEA have improved compared with those reported by NASCET/ACAS. Every patient having CEA from January 1999 through December 2003 was reviewed as part of a continuous quality-assurance program. Patient demographics and risk factors were recorded; high-risk patients were identified using inclusion criteria for high-risk carotid stent trials. Primary end points recorded were all neurologic events, deaths, and myocardial infarctions (MIs). Outcomes were reported individually or as combined neurologic events and deaths (traditional NASCET/ACAS methodology) and, similar to recent carotid stent trials, individually, combined, and as a composite that included MI. A total of 1,927 CEAs were performed, 1,140 in men (59%) and 787 in women (41%). The average age was 72 +/- 9 years; 21% of patients were age 80 or older. Symptomatic patients accounted for 717 procedures (37%). Perioperative neurologic event, death, and MI occurred in 1.0%, 0.5%, and 1.3% of patients, respectively. The combined neurologic event and death rate was 1.3% (symptomatic = 1.8%, asymptomatic = 1.1%). High-risk patients comprised 54% of the cohort; the neurologic event and death rate for this group was 1.6%. The composite end point including MI was 3.4%. Severe coronary artery disease and prior ipsilateral CEA significantly correlated with a higher incidence of primary end point complications. In contemporary practice, the perioperative neurologic event rate is significantly less than reported in NASCET/ACAS. Perioperative death and MI rates were similar to those seen in NASCET/ACAS. Neurologic events and death rates were not different between high- and low-risk groups. These data may serve as a guide for the modern vascular specialist weighing open and endovascular options for treatment of carotid artery occlusive disease in both high- and low-risk patients.     

Natural history of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery occlusion contralateral to carotid endarterectomy: a prospective study

The natural history of carotid occlusion (CO) has generally been analyzed in the presence of a contralateral patent but diseased internal carotid artery (ICA). Few previous studies have focused on the fate of CO contralateral to the side of a prior carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The aim of this study was to analyze the mortality rate and the incidence of cerebrovascular events in the hemisphere ipsilateral to CO (HICO) in patients who had undergone contralateral CEA. The 30-day and long-term outcomes of 153 consecutive patients who had CEA for severe symptomatic and asymptomatic ICA lesions contralateral to a symptomatic or asymptomatic CO over a 15-year period were considered. The endpoints of the study were mortality and neurological events in the HICO. Overall, the 30-day mortality and stroke rates were 0.6% (1/153) and 1.9% (3/153), respectively; the only death was stroke-related and the stroke was ipsilateral to the operated side. The other 2 strokes were ipsilateral to a symptomatic CO. The follow-up was completed for all patients (mean, 7.7 years; range, 1-172 months). Overall, there were 4 late strokes (2.6%), one of them lacunar in a patient with a symptomatic CO, whereas the other 3 were atheroembolic and ipsilateral to the operated ICA. The risk of late stroke in the HICO at 5 and 12 years was 2%. Overall, there were 19 late deaths, none of them stroke-related. CO, with or without symptoms, contralateral to CEA could be considered a locally benign condition in the long term.     

Influence of NASCET/ACAS trial eligibility on outcome after carotid endarterectomy.

PURPOSE: Proponents of carotid angioplasty and stenting suggest that "high risk" patients, defined as patients excluded from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) and Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS), may have a significantly higher risk of stroke with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). However, this selected patient cohort has been poorly studied. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent CEA during a 2-year period at a tertiary referral institution was performed. Each patient was evaluated and categorized, according to the exclusion criteria, by NASCET and ACAS standards. Statistical analysis using chi(2) and Fisher exact tests was performed. RESULTS: There were 366 CEAs performed on 348 patients, including 32 (8.7%) for recurrent stenosis. A subgroup of 169 (46.2%) patients were trial ineligible. Focal ipsilateral symptoms were present in 148 (40.4%) of the patients. There were 9 (2.5%) strokes and 1 (0.3%) death, secondary to a major stroke, for an overall stroke and death rate of 2.5%. Trial-eligible patients had a stroke/death rate of 1.5% (3/197) while trial-ineligible patients had a 3.6% (6/169) stroke/death rate (P = .17). CONCLUSION: Patients who were considered high risk for CEA as defined by trial ineligibility were common, comprising approximately half of our patients. Although trial-ineligible patients had a nonsignificant trend toward higher neurologic morbidity when compared with the eligible group, the risks were still comparable with NASCET/ACAS results. CEA was a safe procedure even in this "high risk" group. As such, ineligibility for a randomized carotid intervention trial should not be employed as a "de novo" indication for carotid stenting.     

Carotid endarterectomy remains the gold standard

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as performed in a community medical center with the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (ACAS) and North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) standards and with representative published results regarding carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). METHODS: Between 1 January 1994 and 31 July 2000, 267 CEA procedures were performed on 236 patients at Madigan Army Medical Center (MAMC). Prospectively acquired patient demographics, operative indications, and surgical outcomes were reviewed using clinical records, carotid duplex evaluations, and follow-up examinations. The resultant data were compared with ACAS, NASCET, and published results of CAS. RESULTS: The perioperative stroke rate was 2.2% (6 of 267) overall, 0.7% (1 of 139) among asymptomatic patients, and 3.9% (5 of 128) among symptomatic patients. There were no perioperative deaths from any cause in the entire series. The respective ACAS and NASCET early stroke-death rates were 2.3% (19 of 825) and 5.8% (19 of 328). The largest published series of CAS reported stroke-death rates of 5.7% (299 of 5,210) overall, and 3.4% (46 of 1,361) and 5.8% (93 of 1,614) for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CEA remains the standard of care. It is a safe, effective, and durable procedure that can be performed in a facility such as MAMC with outcomes that compare favorably with ACAS and NASCET. Results of CEA at MAMC are superior to similar data regarding CAS. Widespread use of CAS should be deferred pending completion of on-going prospective trials versus CEA.     

Influence of patient-related variables on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy

Purpose: Variability in outcome after carotid endarterectomy is well recognized. This study examines the importance of patient-related factors in determining outcome.Methods: Four hundred and sixty consecutive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic severe (60% to 99%) internal carotid stenosis performed by one vascular surgeon have been studied prospectively. Patients were followed-up at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months and then yearly. Pre-, intra-, and perioperative details and follow-up information were entered on a database.Results: Multiple logistic regression identified a number of factors significantly associated with death and stroke. A history of crescendo transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) (p = 0.003, p = 0.0002) and being female ( p = 0.03, p = 0.0001) were associated with both perioperative death and stroke within 30 days of operation, respectively. Deaths between 1 and 36 months were associated with ischemic heart disease (p = 0.03) and diabetes ( p = 0.04), whereas stroke was associated with small internal carotid diameter ( p = 0.02). The importance of symptoms at presentation on outcome was further emphasized by life-table analysis. In 98% of patients with amaurosis fugax, only 67% of those with crescendo TIAs were alive at 18 months ( p < 0.01). The survival of patients with amaurosis was significantly better than those with TIAs ( p < 0.01), transient stroke ( p < 0.01), and progressive stroke ( p < 0.05). Similarly, postoperative stroke was significantly more common for patients with crescendo TIAs than those with amaurosis ( p < 0.01), established stroke ( p < 0.05), and TIA ( p < 0.05). Transient stroke was associated with a poor outcome, with only 66% of patients being alive at 36 months and 14% having suffered a stroke ( p < 0.05 compared with established stroke).Conclusion: Presenting symptoms significantly predict outcome after carotid endarterectomy. This should be considered both in patient selection and comparison of patient series. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:120-6.)     

Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: Late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial

Objective: The durability of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) may be affected by carotid restenosis. The data from randomized trials show that the highest incidence of restenosis after CEA occurs from 12 to 18 months after surgery. The optimal CEA technique to reduce perioperative complications and restenosis rates is still undefined. This study examines the long-term clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis in patients who undergo eversion CEA. Previously published perioperative results of this study did not show statistically significant differences in study endpoints between the eversion and standard techniques. Methods: From October 1994 to March 1997, 1353 patients with surgical indications for carotid stenosis were randomly assigned to undergo eversion (n = 678) or standard CEA (n = 675; primary closure, 419; patch, 256). Withdrawal from the assigned treatment occurred in 1.6% of the patients (in 13 assigned to eversion CEA, and in nine assigned to standard CEA). The clinical and duplex scan follow-up examination was 99% complete, and the mean follow-up interval was 33 months (range, 12 to 55 months). The primary outcomes were perioperative and late major stroke and death, carotid restenosis (stenosis ≥ 50% of the lumen diameter detected at duplex scanning), and carotid occlusion. The primary evaluation of study outcomes was conducted on the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis. Results: Restenosis was found at duplex scanning in 56 patients (19 in the eversion group, and 37 in the standard group). Within the standard group, the restenosis rates were 7.9% in the primary closure population and 1.5% in the patched population. Of the patients with restenosis, 36% underwent cerebral angiography that confirmed restenosis in all cases. The cumulative restenosis risk at 4 years was significantly lower in the group that underwent treatment with eversion CEA as compared with the standard group (3.6% vs 9.2%; P = .01), with an absolute risk reduction of 5.6% and a relative risk reduction of 62%. Eighteen patients would have had to undergo treatment with eversion CEA to prevent one restenosis during the 4-year period. The incidence rate of ipsilateral stroke was 3.3% in the eversion population and 2.2% in the standard group. There were no significant differences in the cumulative risks of ipsilateral stroke (3.9% for eversion, and 2.2% for standard; P = .2) and death (13.1% for eversion, and 12.7% for standard; P = .7)) in the two groups. Of the 18 variables that were examined for their influence on restenosis, eversion CEA (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.6; P = .0004) and patch CEA (hazard ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.07 to 0.6; P = .002) were negative independent predictors of restenosis with multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Conclusion: The EVEREST (EVERsion carotid Endarterectomy versus Standard Trial) showed that eversion CEA is safe, effective, and durable. No statistically significant differences were found in late outcome between the eversion and standard techniques at the available follow-up examination. (J Vasc Surg 2000;31:19-30.)