Discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate, INDO) is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) agonist that has affinity for 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors. It possesses anxiolytic and antihypertensive actions mediated by 5-HT(1A) receptors and anorectic activity mediated by 5-HT(2C/1B) receptors. This study examined whether INDO may exert discriminative control using a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm, and whether differential participation of 5-HT receptor subtypes may be involved in its cue. Male Wistar rats trained to drink their daily water in a 30-min period were trained to discriminate INDO from saline. One group received the intraperitoneal administration of INDO (10.0 mg/kg) before saccharin-LiCl pairings; on alternate days, rats received saline before the saccharin-saline pairings (Group D(+)S(-)). The other group had the contingencies reversed (i.e., the administration of INDO preceded saccharin-saline pairings: Group D(-)S(+)). In two-bottle generalization tests (one bottle containing saccharin, the other plain water), the preference for saccharin was evaluated after different doses of INDO, [3H]-8-hydroxy-2-(di-N-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (5-HT(1A)), buspirone (5-HT(1A)), RU24969 (5-HT(1A/1B)), TFMPP (5-HT(1B/2C)), MK212 (5-HT(2C)), alpha-Me-5-HT (5-HT(2C/2A)), 2-Me-5-HT (5-HT(3)) and cisapride (5-HT(4)). The results showed that INDO, RU24969, TFMPP, alpha-Me-5-HT and MK 212 produced a dose-dependent generalization; 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone produced only partial generalization, while 2-Me-5-HT and cisapride did not produce generalization. The results indicate that INDO administration may exert discriminative control over saccharin preference mediated mainly by 5-HT(1B/2C) receptors, but with an important contribution of 5-HT(1A) receptors.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: lack of interaction with taurine

Recent microdialysis studies showed that ethanol administration increases the release of taurine in various rat brain regions, and it was suggested that this increase in extracellular concentrations of taurine might mediate some of the neurochemical effects of ethanol. Previous drug discrimination studies showed that positive modulators of the GABA(A) receptor consistently substituted for ethanol discriminative stimulus effects. Since taurine is also believed to modulate GABA(A) receptor activity, this study addressed the hypothesis that taurine mediates the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol due to GABA(A) activation. Male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate water from either 1 or 2 g/kg ethanol. In a first experiment, various taurine doses (0-500 mg/kg) were tested to investigate whether taurine substitutes for ethanol. In a second experiment, rats were pretreated with either 500 mg/kg taurine or an equivalent volume of saline before testing for ethanol discrimination with various ethanol doses (0-2.0 g/kg). The results showed that taurine does not substitute for ethanol at any tested doses. In addition, taurine pretreatments failed to modify the dose-response curve for ethanol discrimination. These results demonstrate that taurine is not directly involved in mediating the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. It is therefore very unlikely that the brain release of taurine observed after ethanol administration is implicated in the major pharmacological effects of ethanol, i.e. positive modulation of GABA(A) receptor, that mediate its discriminative stimulus effects.     

Nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat: effects of ethanol

It has been shown that small doses of ethanol antagonise the discriminative stimulus properties of nicotine in the rat. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether ethanol could antagonise the aversive stimulus effects of nicotine. Wistar rats were trained to associate nicotine injections with a novel tasting fluid (0.1% saccharin) in the conditioned taste aversion procedure. Nicotine (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) was injected 5 min after the end of a 20-min exposure to the saccharin solution. Ethanol (0.25-0.5 g/kg, i.p.) was administered 5 or 50 min before nicotine. In general, ethanol did not inhibit nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. Contrary to the findings in drug discrimination studies, a slight but significant enhancement of nicotine-induced taste aversion conditioning was observed after ethanol pre-treatment. Blood ethanol levels were measured in a separate group of rats. Maximal blood ethanol levels after i.p. administration of 0.25 or 0.5 g/kg ethanol exceeded 20 and 80 mg%, respectively. Concluding, the present results may indicate that ethanol does not attenuate nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion in the rat.     

Differential effects on conditioned taste aversion learning with peripherally and centrally administered acetaldehyde

Acetaldehyde, the primary metabolite of ethanol, produces a variety of aversive symptoms when present in the body in high concentrations. Laboratory rats were able to learn to associate a novel tasting saccharin solution with the toxic effects of an intraperitoneal injection of acetaldehyde. However, when the acetaldehyde was administered intracerebroventricularly, there was no manifestation of a conditioned avoidance of the saccharin taste. It is suggested that the aversive effects of acetaldehyde are mediated by peripheral toxicosis rather than by the pharmacological actions of acetaldehyde in the brain.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone in Long-Evans rats: assessment with the conditioned taste aversion baseline of drug discrimination learning

Rationale  The characterization of the discriminative stimulus properties of naloxone has focused primarily on its actions at the mu opioid receptor, although naloxone also displays an affinity for delta and kappa receptor subtypes. Objectives  The present study extends this characterization of the naloxone cue by investigating if relatively specific antagonists for the mu (naltrexone: 0.10–0.56 mg/kg), delta (naltrindole: 1–18 mg/kg), and kappa (MR2266: 1.8–10 mg/kg) opioid receptor subtypes will substitute for naloxone in animals trained to discriminate naloxone from its vehicle. The temporal nature of the naloxone cue was examined by varying pretreatment time points (15, 30, 45, 60 min). Finally, various doses of naltrexone methobromide (1–18 mg/kg) were assessed to determine peripheral mediation of the cue. Materials and methods  Female Long–Evans rats (N = 30) received an injection of naloxone (1 mg/kg; i.p.) 15 min prior to a pairing of saccharin (20-min access) and the emetic LiCl (1.8 mEq; i.p.; n = 16, group NL) or vehicle (n = 14, group NW); on other days, they were injected with saline prior to saccharin alone. Substitution tests with compounds with various receptor affinities and selective CNS and PNS actions were then assessed. Results  Only naloxone and naltrexone produced dose-dependent decreases in saccharin consumption. Naloxone administered at 15 and 30 min before saccharin produced decreases in consumption similar to that displayed on training days. Naltrexone methobromide substituted only at the highest dose tested (18 mg/kg). Conclusions  Naloxone’s stimulus effects appear to be mediated centrally via activity at the mu opioid receptor. This work was funded by a grant from the Mellon Foundation to Anthony L. Riley and by the intramural research programs of the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.     

Role of acetaldehyde in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion in rats

Rationale. In spite of many recent studies on the effects of acetaldehyde, it is still unclear whether acetaldehyde mediates the reinforcing and/or aversive effects of ethanol. Objectives. The present study reexamined the role of acetaldehyde in ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA). A first experiment compared ethanol- and acetaldehyde-induced CTA. In a second experiment, cyanamide, an aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor, was administered before conditioning with either ethanol or acetaldehyde to investigate the effects of acetaldehyde accumulation. Methods. A classic CTA protocol was used to associate the taste of a saccharin solution with either ethanol or acetaldehyde injections. In experiment 1, saccharin consumption was followed by injections of either ethanol (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0 g/kg) or acetaldehyde (0, 100, 170 or 300 mg/kg). In experiment 2, the rats were pretreated with either saline or cyanamide (25 mg/kg) before conditioning with either ethanol or acetaldehyde. Results. Both ethanol and acetaldehyde induced significant CTA. However, ethanol produced a very strong CTA relative to acetaldehyde that induced only a weak CTA even at toxic doses. Cyanamide pretreatments significantly potentiated ethanol- but not acetaldehyde-induced CTA. Conclusions. The present results indicate that ethanol-induced CTA does not result from brain acetaldehyde effects. In contrast, it is suggested that the reinforcing effects of brain acetaldehyde might actually reduce ethanol-induced CTA. Our results also suggest that the inhibition of brain catalase activity may contribute to the potentiating effects of cyanamide on ethanol-induced CTA. Electronic Publication     

Antagonism of the 5-HT1A receptor stimulus in a conditioned taste aversion procedure.

The conditioned taste aversion procedure in mice was used to test for blockade of the drug stimulus of the 5-HT1A receptor agonists (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin HBr (8-OH-DPAT), 1-(4-trifluoromethyl-2-pyridinyl)-4- [4-[2-oxo-1-pyrrolidinyl]butyl]piperazine (E)-2-butenedioate (Org 13011) and the 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine. The conditioned taste aversion induced by 8-OH-DPAT (0.22 mg/kg) and Org 13011 (0.5 mg/kg) was readily blocked by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY-100635) (0.1 mg/kg). The conditioned taste aversion induced by fluoxetine could not be antagonized by WAY-100635 nor by the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist mianserin. It is concluded that the conditioned taste aversion induced by 8-OH-DPAT or Org 13011 is mediated via 5-HT1A receptors. The results suggest that the conditioned taste aversion induced by fluoxetine is not exclusively mediated by 5-HT1A receptors nor exclusively by 5-HT2 receptors. The results also indicate that the conditioned taste aversion paradigm can be used to test for antagonism of stimulus properties of compounds.     

Stimulus properties of fluvoxamine in a conditioned taste aversion procedure

A conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure in mice was used to investigate the stimulus effects of the serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluvoxamine and fluoxetine. Fluvoxamine elicited a reliable CTA (ED₅₀ = 24 mg/kg, SC) and a number of drugs were tested as pre-exposure drugs. Pre-exposure to the serotonin (5-HT)_1A receptor agonists flesinoxan and ±-8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT) prevented the CTA induced by fluvoxamine (50 mg/kg, SC). Pre-exposure with the 5-HT_2C receptor agonist MK 212 [6-chloro-2(1-piperazinyl)pyrazine] partially prevented the fluvoxamine-induced CTA, pre-exposure with the 5-HT_2A/2C receptor agonist DOI [1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl] did not prevent the CTA induced by fluvoxamine. Flesinoxan pre-exposure also prevented the taste aversion induced by fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, SC) completely. This contrasts previous results obtained with fluoxetine, where was found that its stimulus is primarily mediated by 5-HT_2C, and to a lesser degree by 5-HT_1A receptors. Therefore, we compared the two SSRIs directly. Pre-exposure to fluvoxamine prevented the fluoxetine-induced CTA, whereas pre-exposure to fluoxetine only partially prevented the fluvoxamine-induced CTA. We conclude that 5-HT_1A receptors are involved in the stimulus properties of both fluvoxamine and fluoxetine, that 5-HT_2C receptors are involved in fluvoxamine and especially fluoxetine, and , based primarily on the cross-comparison tests, that the two SSRIs have somewhat different stimulus properties. Received: 3 March 1998 / Final version: 26 May 1998     

Stimulus properties of venlafaxine in a conditioned taste aversion procedure

Conditioned stimulus properties of venlafaxine are still unknown. In the present study, the discriminative stimulus properties of venlafaxine by using a conditioned taste aversion procedure were investigated. Swiss Webster mice were allowed to reach water from 2 pipettes for 20 min (09:00-11:30 h), plus 30 min (15:30-16:00 h), daily. During the 4 days, the test drugs [fluoxetine, escitalopram, tianeptine, reboxetine, and Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)] were injected to mice at least 1 h after they had first water session. On day 5, they consumed glucose solution (5% w/v) and immediately injected with conditioning drug (venlafaxine 32 mg/kg). On day 8, mice were allowed to make a choice between water and glucose solution. The amount of glucose consumption as a percentage of total fluid intakes was calculated for each animal. Significant reduction in glucose choice was defined as conditioned taste aversion. Venlafaxine (32 mg/kg) induced a robust conditioned taste aversion in mice. Pre-exposure to tianeptine (2.5-10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), escitalopram (32 mg/kg), and reboxetine (5 mg/kg) substituted for venlafaxine by preventing the conditioned taste aversion induced by venlafaxine. L-NAME did not substitute for venlafaxine. Substitution of venlafaxine by fluoxetine, tianeptine, escitalopram, and reboxetine provides further evidence that both 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptake inhibition may play an important role in the stimulus effect of venlafaxine.     

Preexposure effects of nicotine and acetaldehyde on conditioned taste aversion induced by both drugs

Previous assessments have demonstrated an interaction between ethanol and nicotine in the conditioned taste-aversion (CTA) paradigm. The present study assessed whether acetaldehyde, the primary reinforcing metabolite of ethanol, would interact with nicotine as well. In six experiments, water-deprived male Wistar rats were preexposed to either acetaldehyde (0.2 or 0.3 g/kg, IP) or nicotine (0.8, 1.2, or 2 mg/kg, SC) for 3 consecutive days and then subsequently conditioned, 24 h later, with either nicotine (0.8, 1.2, or 2 mg/kg, SC) or acetaldehyde (0.2 or 0.3 g/kg, IP), respectively. There were 4 conditioning days and 4 drug-free test days, each spaced 72 h apart. On test days, animals were offered a free choice between water and saccharin. The results of the following set of experiments demonstrated a dose-related interaction between nicotine and acetaldehyde, where lower doses of each drug failed to attenuate CTA induced by one another, but a higher nicotine dose (2 mg/kg) attenuated the formation of a CTA induced by acetaldehyde (0.3 g/kg). It was argued that the primary metabolite of ethanol may play a role in the interaction between nicotine and ethanol previously observed.     

Discriminated conditioned taste aversion for studying multi-element stimulus control

The effects of morphine pre-treatment interval on the stimulus control exerted by a multi-element stimulus consisting of morphine (5.6mg/kg), saccharin (0.2%, w/v), and a ball-bearing drinking nozzle in a discriminated taste aversion procedure were examined. In this discriminated aversion procedure, rats received injections of LiCI following presentation of this multielement stimulus, and injections of saline following the saline, water, and non-ball-bearing nozzle composite stimulus. These paired rats were compared to unpaired rats that received saline injections rather than LiCI injections following presentation of the multi-element stimulus. Morphine pre-treatment times of 5, 10, and 20min were examined in groups of 12 paired and 6 unpaired rats. The discrimination was rapidly learned under all three pre-treatment intervals. In subsequent testing with each individual stimulus element and combinations of two stimulus elements, stimulus control was clearly exerted by both morphine and saccharin. Paired rats drank less saccharin than unpaired rats, and less saccharin than water. Similarly, paired rats drank less fluid following morphine administration than following saline administration, and less fluid than unpaired rats following morphine administration. Control by the nozzle type was also apparent in significant interactions between the nozzle and morphine or saccharin and pairing with LiCI. In general, pre-treatment time did not influence the stimulus control that developed. However, at the two shorter pre-treatment times there was some indication that a conditioned taste aversion to morphine was developing in the unpaired rats. These experiments indicate that such discriminated taste aversion procedures may be viable methods for studying the contextual control of how drugs function as discriminative stimuli, and that longer drug pre-treatment times may be desirable in such procedures.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of self-administered ethanol

The conditions under which a drug is administered often alter the behavioral effects of that drug. The present study examined the effect of changes in response dependence on the discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol. Six Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate 1000 mg/kg, interperitoneal (i.p.) ethanol from saline. A dose-effect curve was then obtained using i.p. doses of 100, 320, 560, 1000, 1320 and 1560 mg/kg ethanol. Ethanol doses of 1000 mg/kg and greater produced more than 80% ethanol-lever selection. The rats were then trained to orally self-administer 10% weight/volume ethanol and tested to determine if self-administered oral ethanol would substitute for experimenter administered i.p. ethanol. A mean self-administered ethanol intake of 1114 mg/kg (+/-156 mg/kg) produced 83% ethanol-lever responding. Restricted access to 560 mg/kg of self-administered ethanol resulted in 33% i.p. ethanol-lever responding. Doses of 100 and 320 mg/kg ethanol did not substitute for i.p. ethanol. These data show that orally self-administered ethanol can produce discriminative stimulus effects that are similar to i.p. experimenter-administered ethanol and that orally self-administered ethanol produces centrally-mediated discriminative stimulus effects.     

Caffeine, nicotine and mecamylamine share stimulus properties in the preexposure conditioned taste aversion procedure

RATIONALE: The present study examined whether nicotine and caffeine, two of the most widely used psychoactive drugs, share stimulus properties in the preexposure conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether nicotine would attenuate the formation of a caffeine-induced CTA and further assess whether pretreatment with mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, would reverse nicotine's attenuating effect of a caffeine-induced CTA. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were preexposed with one of three doses of nicotine (0.6, 1.2 and 2.0 mg/kg, s.c.) for three consecutive days, then 24 h following the final preexposure injection were conditioned with caffeine (20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg, i.p.) in a standard two-bottle test. There were four conditioning trials and four drug-free test days. In a follow-up study, rats were pretreated with mecamylamine (2 mg/kg, i.p.) prior to preexposure injections with nicotine (0.6 mg/kg, i.p.), then subsequently conditioned with caffeine (20 mg/kg, i.p.) as described above. RESULTS: The lowest nicotine dose (0.6 mg/kg) attenuated the caffeine induced CTAs (20 mg/kg and 30 mg/kg) but the higher nicotine doses showed no such attenuating effect. In addition, mecamylamine reversed the nicotine-induced attenuation of the caffeine-induced CTA and also directly attenuated it. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that caffeine, nicotine and mecamylamine share overlapping stimulus properties and that the nature of this relationship may involve action at the nicotinic-cholinergic receptor.     

Assessment of the stimulus properties of anxiolytic drugs by means of the conditioned taste aversion procedure.

The conditioned taste aversion (CTA) procedure has recently been described as a more rapid alternative to two-lever operant procedures in drug discrimination research. We trained different groups of rats to discriminate the benzodiazepine chlordiazepoxide (CDP, 20 mg/kg) or the 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) (0.4 mg/kg) from saline by means of the CTA procedure. The results were in agreement with findings from two-lever operant drug discrimination procedures. However, discrimination training took 40 sessions in the case of CDP and 72 sessions for 8-OH-DPAT, which is comparable to results obtained with two-lever operant procedures. Dose-response curves were determined and generalization tests were performed for different benzodiazepine and nonbenzodiazepine anxiolytics. Baseline behavior deteriorated in the course of generalization and substitution testing, thus preventing further generalization testing. Our experience is that the use of the CTA procedure in drug discrimination research does not have sufficient advantages over traditionally used procedures to replace the latter.     

5-Hydroxytryptophan-induced conditioned taste aversion to ethanol in the rat

This experiment was conducted to determine the efficacy of 5-HTP in producing conditioned taste aversions (CTAs) to ethanol in rats restricted to a one-hour daily access to fluid. Administration of 100 mg/kg of DL-5-HTP immediately following novel exposure to ethanol resulted in an aversion of such magnitude that some rats refused to consume the ethanol solution. Since ethanol was the only fluid available to these rats, they eventually died, presumably of dehydration. By comparison, LiCl administration also produced a CTA to ethanol, but no such persistent rejection was observed. Both 5-HTP and LiCl also produced CTAs when saccharin and tartaric acid solutions were used as novel fluids, but these aversions were short-lived and all rats resumed drinking. The causative factor(s) in the persistent ethanol rejection until death observed in rats treated with 5-HTP remain undetermined but the results have indicated that simple CS-UCS associative learning mechanisms are probably not a primary causative factor.     

Effects of prenatal ethanol exposure and postnatal handling on conditioned taste aversion

Studies have shown that animals prenatally exposed to ethanol (E) exhibit deficits in conditioned taste aversion as well as displaying hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) hyperresponsiveness during exposure to stressors. In contrast, postnatal handling has been shown to attenuate both emotional and HPA reactivity under certain conditions. The present study tested the hypothesis that handling could attenuate adverse effects of prenatal ethanol exposure on consummatory behavior and HPA activity in a conditioned taste aversion task. We found that both prenatal ethanol exposure and handling independently increased saccharin consumption over 5 days of pretoxicosis exposure, suggesting that neophobia decreased at a faster rate in these animals. When conditioned aversion was assessed in handled animals under nondeprived conditions, E animals showed increased consumption compared to controls. Furthermore, across prenatal groups, lower corticosterone (CORT) levels were found in handled compared to nonhandled animals during reexposure under food-deprived conditions, emphasizing the importance of assessing both behavior and HPA function when examining an animal's response to a task and indicating that handling may not be effective at attenuating some deficits in E animals.     

Antagonism of drug discrimination learning within the conditioned taste aversion procedure.

Animals injected with morphine prior to the presentation of a saccharin-LiCl pairing and the morphine vehicle prior to saccharin alone rapidly acquired the drug discrimination, avoiding saccharin following the administration of morphine and consuming saccharin following its vehicle after only four conditioning trials. Once stimulus control was established, the opiate antagonist naloxone (1 mg/kg) was administered prior to morphine in a test of its ability to antagonize the morphine stimulus. Pretreatment times ranged from 10 to 180 min. Naloxone antagonized the stimulus properties of morphine for all subjects, although there were individual differences in the onset, duration (time course) and degree of antagonism. Together with the rapid acquisition typically reported in this design, the fact that antagonism was demonstrated in the present study suggests that the conditioned taste aversion procedure may be useful in the general assessment of drug discriminations.     

Enduring effects of morphine pellets revealed by conditioned taste aversion

Morphine pellets (75 mg) were implanted subcutaneously in albino rats. Three days later, following 24 h without water, these rats (Group MSN) were given access to a saccharin solution for 30 min, then injected with naloxone hydrochloride. The classical abstinence signs, including wet dog shakes and weight loss, were noted in these subjects, but not in controls given placebo pellets and/or saline injections. In addition, when given an opportunity to drink either saccharine solution or water 24 h later, Group MSN rats drank significantly less saccharin than any of the control groups. Similar drinking patterns were found even when naloxone injection was delayed as long as 3 weeks after pellet implantation, when none of the classical abstinence signs were seen and serum levels of morphine and its metabolites were 100 times lower according to radioimmunoassay. This simple and objective technique is thus more sensitive as a measure of prior morphine exposure than any of the commonly used indices. The continued utility of a dependent-nondependent dichotomy is also examined in light of these and other findings.     

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol in rats using a three-choice ethanol-midazolam-water discrimination

Three-choice discrimination procedures are used to characterize how similar the discriminative stimulus effects of two drugs are in relation to each other. This procedure has suggested similarities between ethanol and ligands that positively modulate the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptor complex. As an extension to these studies, male Long-Evans rats were trained to discriminate midazolam (3.0 mg/kg, i.p.) from ethanol (1.0 g/kg, i.g.) from water (2.3 ml, i.g.) in a three-lever, food reinforced task. Substitution tests were conducted following administration of GABAA-positive modulators, noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists, 5-HT1B agonists and isopropanol. Among the GABAA-positive modulators, diazepam was the only drug that completely substituted for midazolam; both pentobarbital and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone showed partial midazolam substitution. The NMDA antagonist dizocilpine substituted for ethanol, while phencyclidine showed no substitution for either ethanol or midazolam. The serotonin agonists tested also showed no substitution for either ethanol or midazolam. Isopropanol was the only other drug that completely substituted for ethanol. These data extend previous findings from an ethanol-pentobarbital-water discrimination and further define training conditions that result in a conditional basis for the ethanol discrimination where only those drugs with pharmacological heterogeneous effects similar to ethanol produce a full ethanol-like effect.     

Effects of plant ingestion in rats determined by the conditioned taste aversion procedure

The conditioned taste aversion procedure was used to compare the aversive effects produced by 40 plants (mostly common household varieties) to those of amphetamine, lithium chloride and ethyl alcohol. Test substances (plant homogenates or drug solutions) were given to rats by force-feeding 5 min after the subjects' first exposure to 0·1% saccharin solution, which was available for 15 min from a water bottle. The comparison of the consumption of saccharin solution, two days after test substance administration, to the initial saccharin consumption was taken as a measure of the aversive effects produced by the test substance, e.g. greater suppression of saccharin intake indicating greater aversive properties. Dose dependent suppression of saccharin intake was obtained with most of the substances tested at more than one concentration. Administration of Pokeberry seeds, Japanese Yew, Norfolk Island Pine and Oleander leaves suppressed saccharin intake more than ethyl alcohol. The rest of the plants tested produced less conditioned aversion than ethyl alcohol. Some plants which are frequently called poisonous (Poinsettia, Philodendron and Dieffenbachia) were not particuarly effective in producing conditioned taste aversion. Good correlation existed between suppression of saccharin intake produced by the three drugs tested and their approximate acute lethal doses in rats and humans, suggesting that the conditioned taste aversion procedure may indicate the approximate acute lethality of these substances. Good correlation was also found between the dry weight of the plants and the suppression of saccharin intake.