First treatment for brain metastases by stereotactic radiosurgery]

Local control of brain metastases is better with first treatment by stereotactic radiosurgery than with radiosurgery for recurrence. We reported a retrospective analysis of the influence of clinical and technical factors on local control and survival after radiosurgery realised in first intention. From January 1994 to December 1997, 26 patients presenting with 43 metastases underwent radiosurgery. The median age was 61 years and the median Karnofsky index 70. Primary sites included: lung (12 patients), kidney (7 patients), breast (2 patients), colon (1 patient), melanoma (2 patients), osteosarcoma (1 patient), it was unknown for one patient. Seven patients had extracranial metastases. Twenty-one sessions of radiosurgery have been realized for one metastase, and 9 for two, three or four lesions. The median diameter was 21 mm and the median volume 1.8 cm3. The median peripheral dose to the lesion was 14 Gy, and the median dose at the isocenter 20 Gy. Forty-two metastases were evaluable for response analysis. The overall local control rate was 90.5% and the 1-year, 2- and 3-year actuarial rates were 85% and 75%. In univariate analysis, theorical radioresistance was significantly associated with better local control (100% versus 77%, p < 0.05). All patients were evaluable for survival. The median survival rate was 15 months. Four patients had a symptomatic oedema (RTOG grade II). Two lesions have required a surgical excision. In conclusion, low dose radiosurgery (14 Gy delivered at the periphery of metastasis) can be proposed in first intention for brain metastases, in particularly for theorical radioresistant lesions.     

Initial clinical experience with frameless stereotactic radiosurgery: analysis of accuracy and feasibility.

PURPOSE: To report on preliminary clinical experience with a novel image-guided frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients ranging in age from 14 to 81 received radiosurgery using a commercially available frameless stereotactic radiosurgery system. Pathologic diagnoses included metastases (12), recurrent primary intracranial sarcoma (1), recurrent central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (1), and medulloblastoma with supratentorial seeding (1). Treatment accuracy was assessed from image localization of the stereotactic reference array and reproducibility of biteplate reseating. We chose 0.3 mm vector translation error and 0.3 degree rotation about each axis as the maximum tolerated misalignment before treating each arc. RESULTS: The biteplates were found on average to reseat with a reproducibility of 0.24 mm. The mean registration error from CT localization was found to be 0.5 mm, which predicts that the average error at isocenter was 0.82 mm. No patient treatment was delivered beyond the maximum tolerated misalignment. The radiosurgery treatment was delivered in approximately 25 min per patient. CONCLUSION: Our initial clinical experience with stereotactic radiotherapy using the infrared camera guidance system was promising, demonstrating clinical feasibility and accuracy comparable to many frame-based systems.     

Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes after a single stereotactic radiosurgery procedure for the care of patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred five patients with primary malignancies, including non-small-cell lung carcinoma (42%), breast carcinoma (23%), melanoma (17%), renal cell carcinoma (6%), colon cancer (3%), and others (10%) underwent gamma knife radiosurgery for 4 or more intracranial metastases at one time. The median number of brain metastases was 5 (range, 4-18) with a median total treatment volume of 6.8 cc (range, 0.6-51.0 cc). Radiosurgery was used as sole management (17% of patients), or in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (46%) or after failure of whole brain radiotherapy (38%). The median marginal radiosurgery dose was 16 Gy (range, 12-20 Gy). The mean follow-up was 8 months. RESULTS: The median overall survival after radiosurgery for all patients was 8 months. The 1-year local control rate was 71%, and the median time to progressive/new brain metastases was 9 months. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) classification system, the median overall survivals for RPA classes I, II, and III were 18, 9, and 3 months, respectively (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis revealed total treatment volume, age, RPA classification, and marginal dose as significant prognostic factors. The number of metastases was not statistically significant (p = 0.333). CONCLUSION: Radiosurgery seems to provide survival benefit for patients with 4 or more intracranial metastases. Because total treatment volume was the most significant predictor of survival, the total volume of brain metastases, rather than the number of metastases, should be considered in identifying appropriate radiosurgery candidates.     

Transient enlargement of contrast uptake on MRI after linear accelerator (linac) stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases

Purpose/Objective: With the increasing number of patients successfully treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases, decision making after therapy based on follow-up imaging findings becomes more and more important. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive means for follow-up studies. The objective of this study was to investigate the treatment outcome of our radiosurgery program and to describe the response of brain metastases to contrast-enhanced MRI after linear accelerator (linac) stereotactic radiosurgery and identify factors to distinguish among local control and local failure.

Methods and Materials: Using serial MRI, we followed the course of 87 brain metastases in 48 consecutive patients treated between September 1996 and November 1997 with linac-based radiosurgery with 15-MV photons. Treatment planning was performed on an MR data cube. For spherical metastases, radiosurgery was delivered using a 9 noncoplanar arc technique with circular-shaped collimators. For irregularly shaped targets, radiosurgery was delivered using a manually driven multi-leaf collimator with a leaf width of 1.5 mm projected to the isocenter. Median radiosurgery dose was 20 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodose. Together with whole brain radiotherapy (20 × 2 Gy, 5/w), a median radiosurgical dose of 15 Gy was delivered. Median follow-up was 8 (range 2–36) months. Factors influencing local control and survival rates were analyzed with respect to MRI response, and Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated.

Results: Actuarial local tumor control was 91% at one and two years. Patient survival at one and two years was 30% and 18%. Median survival was 9 months. During follow-up in 70 (81%) of the 87 treated metastases, the contrast-enhancing volumes on T1W images were stable or disappeared partly or completely. A transient enlargement of contrast-enhancing volumes was observed in 11 (12%) of the 87 lesions treated, while a progressive enlargement due to local treatment failure was observed in 6 (7%) of the 87 treated metastases. Younger age, early contrast onset after radiosurgery, and previous chemotherapy were associated with this transient enlargement of contrast-enhancing lesion volume.

Conclusions: Linac-based radiosurgery is an effective, noninvasive, and safe treatment option for patients with brain metastases. A marked enlargement of the contrast-enhancing volume on T₁-weighted MR images after radiosurgery is a sensitive predictor for, but not equivalent with, local failure. In as many as two-thirds of the cases with contrast enlargement in MRI follow-up, the contrast enlargement is transient with no need for further treatment. While some MRI findings are more likely if transient enlargement is present, a clear decision cannot be made based on MRI, and ultimately the clinical status dictates further action.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as an alternative to radiosurgery for the treatment of patients with brain metastases

PURPOSE: Modeling studies have demonstrated a potential biologic advantage of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for malignant brain tumors as compared to radiosurgery (SRS), even when only a few fractions are utilized. We prospectively evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, efficacy and cost of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) in the treatment of selected radiosurgery-eligible patients with brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a limited number of brain metastases not involving the brainstem or optic chiasm underwent linac-based HSRT delivered in 3 fractions using a relocatable stereotactic frame. Depth-helmet and reference point measurements were recorded to address treatment accuracy. All patients underwent whole brain radiotherapy to a dose of 30 Gy. Toxicity, response, and survival duration were recorded for each patient. Prognostic factors were assessed by Cox regression analysis. Cost comparisons with a cohort of SRS treated patients were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with 57 brain metastases were treated with HSRT. Twenty-three and 9 patients underwent HSRT for upfront and salvage treatment, respectively. The median dose delivered was 27 Gy, given in 3 fractions of 9 Gy. From 3328 depth-helmet measurements, the absolute median setup deviation in AP, lateral, and vertical orientations was approximately 1.0 mm. No significant acute toxicity was seen. Late toxicities included seizures in four patients, and radionecrosis in two patients. The median survival duration from treatment was 12 months. KPS (p = 0.039) and RTOG-RPA class (p = 0.039) were identified as significant prognostic factors for survival. HSRT was $4119 less costly than SRS. CONCLUSION: HSRT, as delivered in this study, is more comfortable for patients and less costly than SRS in the treatment of selected patients with brain metastases. Proper dose selection and radiobiologic/toxicity trade-offs with SRS await further study.     

Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy: commissioning and verification of dose distributions

Purpose: Conformal stereotactic radiosurgery and radiotherapy using a linear accelerator and a micromultileaf collimator (mMLC) offer the possibility of irradiating irregularly shaped target volumes. Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy, i.e., stereotactic radiation therapy combining a moving gantry with a dynamic mMLC, enable the radiation even of lesions with concave structures.

Methods and Materials: The dynamic arc method requires additional tools for quality assurance (QA) and three-dimensional verification at a high spatial resolution. A QA program was developed. Dose distributions of planning target volumes with concavities were investigated in polymer gel phantoms. The radiation-induced change of the relaxation rate R₂ was measured by magnetic resonance imaging. The distributions were compared with image processing tools.

Results: Using the therapy-planning software BrainSCAN 4.0 (and 4.1β) in combination with the mMLC m3, deviations between the planned and measured 90% isodoses of about 2 mm were registered in the isocenter plane. Three-dimensional verification was feasible in the range of accuracy achieved in planning and dose measurement.

Conclusions: Dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy offer excellent conformation even for complicated planning target volumes with concavities. The dose distribution calculated with the treatment-planning software used can be accomplished with the available equipment. Patients can be treated by dynamic arc radiosurgery and radiotherapy.     

Ultrasound-guided extracranial radiosurgery: technique and application

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective treatment modality for many intracranial lesions, but target mobility limits its utility for extracranial applications. We have developed a new technique for extracranial radiosurgery based on optically guided three-dimensional ultrasound (3DUS). The 3DUS system provides the ability to image the target volume and critical structures in real time and determine any misregistration of the target volume with the linear accelerator. In this paper, we describe the system and its initial clinical application in the treatment of localized metastatic disease. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The extracranial stereotactic system consists of an ultrasound unit that is optically tracked and registered with the linear accelerator coordinate system. After an initial patient positioning based on computed tomographic (CT) simulation, stereotactic ultrasound images are acquired and correlated with the CT-based treatment plan to determine any soft-tissue shifts between the time of the planning CT and the actual treatment. Optical tracking is used to correct any patient offsets that are revealed by the real-time imaging. RESULTS: Preclinical testing revealed that the ultrasound-based stereotactic navigation system is accurate to within 1.5 mm in comparison with an absolute coordinate phantom. Between March 2001 and March 2002, the system was used to deliver extracranial radiosurgery to 17 metastatic lesions in 16 patients. Treatments were delivered in 1 or 2 fractions, with an average fractional dose of 16 Gy (range 12.5-24 Gy) delivered to the 80% isodose surface. Before each fraction, the target misalignment from isocenter was determined using the 3DUS system and the misalignments averaged over all patients were anteroposterior = 4.8 mm, lateral = 3.6 mm, axial = 2.1 mm, and average total 3D displacement = 7.4 mm (range = 0-21.0 mm). After correcting patient misalignment, each plan was delivered as planned using 6-11 noncoplanar fields. No acute complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: A system for high-precision radiosurgical treatment of metastatic tumors has been developed, tested, and applied clinically. Optical tracking of the ultrasound probe provides real-time tracking of the patient anatomy and allows computation of the target displacement before treatment delivery. The patient treatments reported here suggest the feasibility and safety of the technique.     

Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy for primary and metastatic liver tumors using the novalis image-guided system: preliminary results regarding efficacy and toxicity

www.tcrt.org The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary and metastatic liver tumors using the Novalis image-guided radiotherapy system. After preliminarily treating liver tumors using the Novalis system from July 2006, we started a protocol-based study in February 2008. Eighteen patients (6 with primary hepatocellular carcinoma and 12 with metastatic liver tumor) were treated with 55 or 50 Gy, depending upon their planned dose distribution and liver function, delivered in 10 fractions over 2 weeks. Four non-coplanar and three coplanar static beams were used. Patient age ranged from 54 to 84 years (median: 72 years). The Child-Pugh classification was Grade A in 17 patients and Grade B in 1. Tumor diameter ranged from 12 to 35 mm (median: 23 mm). Toxicities were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events version 4.0, and radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) was defined by Lawrence's criterion. The median follow-up period was 14.5 months. For all patients, the 1-year overall survival and local control rates were 94% and 86%, respectively. A Grade 1 liver enzyme change was observed in 5 patients, but no RILD or chronic liver dysfunction was observed. SBRT using the Novalis image-guided system is safe and effective for treating primary and metastatic liver tumors. Further investigation of SBRT for liver tumors is warranted. In view of the acceptable toxicity observed with this protocol, we have moved to a new protocol to shorten the overall treatment time and escalate the dose.     

Radiosurgery for re-irradiation of brain metastasis: results in 54 patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate in terms of probabilities of local-regional control and survival, as well as of treatment-related toxicity, results of radiosurgery for brain metastasis arising in previously irradiated territory. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1994 and March 2000, 54 consecutive patients presenting with 97 metastases relapsing after whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were treated with stereotactic radiotherapy. Median interval between the end of WBRT and radiosurgery was 9 months (range 2-70). Median age was 53 years (24-80), and median Karnofski performance status (KPS) 70 (60-100). Forty-seven patients had one radiosurgery, five had two and two had three. Median metastasis diameter and volume were 21 mm (6-59) and 1.2 cc (0.1-95.2), respectively. A Leksell stereotactic head frame (Leksell Model G, Elektra, Instrument, Tucker, GA) was applied under local anesthesia. Irradiation was delivered by a gantry mounted linear accelerator (linacs) (Saturne, General Electric). Median minimal dose delivered to the gross disease was 16.2 Gy (11.8-23), and median maximal dose 21.2 Gy (14- 42). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9 months (1-57). Five metastases recurred. One- and 2-year metastasis local control rates were 91.3 and 84% and 1- and 2-year brain control rates were 65 and 57%, respectively. Six patients died of brain metastasis evolution, and three of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. One- and 2-year overall survival rates were 31 and 28%, respectively. According to univariate analysis, KPS, RPA class, SIR score and interval between WBRT and radiosurgery were prognostic factors of overall survival and brain free-disease survival. According to multivariate analysis, RPA was an independent factor of overall survival and brain free-disease survival, and the interval between WBRT and radiosurgery longer than 14 months was associated with longer brain free-disease survival. Side effects were minimal, with only two cases of headaches and two of grade 2 alopecia. CONCLUSION: Salvage radiosurgery of metastasis recurring after whole brain irradiation is an effective and accurate treatment which could be proposed to patients with a KPS>70 and a primary tumour controlled or indolent. We recommend that a dose not exceeding 14 Gy should be delivered to an isodose representing 70% of the maximal dose since local control observed rate was similar to that previously published in literature with upper dose and side effects were minimal.     

Analysis of tumor control and toxicity in patients who have survived at least one year after radiosurgery for brain metastases

PURPOSE: To better evaluate tumor control and toxicity from radiosurgery for brain metastases, we analyzed these outcomes in patients who had survived at least 1 year after radiosurgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the results of gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for 208 brain metastases in 137 patients who were followed for a median of 18 months (range 12-122) after radiosurgery. The median patient age was 53 years (range 3-83). Ninety-nine patients had solitary metastases. Thirty-eight had multiple tumors. Sixty-nine patients underwent initial SRS with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), 39 had initial SRS alone, and 27 patients had failed prior WBRT. The median treatment volume was 1.9 cm(3) (range 0.05-21.2). The median marginal tumor dose was 16 Gy (range 12-25). The most common histologic types included non-small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma, which comprised 37.0%, 22.6%, 13.0%, and 9.13% of the lesions, respectively. Forty-five tumors were associated with extensive edema. RESULTS: At 1 and 5 years, the local tumor control rate was 89.6% +/- 2.1% and 62.8% +/- 6.9%, distal intracranial relapse occurred in 23% +/- 3.6% and 67.1% +/- 8.7%, and postradiosurgical sequelae developed in 2.8% +/- 1.2% and 11.4% +/- 3.5% of patients, respectively. Multivariate analysis found that local control decreased with tumor volume (p = 0.0002), SRS without WBRT (p = 0.008), and extensive edema (p = 0.024); distal intracranial recurrence correlated with younger patient age (p = 0.0018); and postradiosurgical sequelae increased with increasing tumor volume (p = 0.0085). CONCLUSION: Long-term control of brain metastases and complication rates in this selective series of patients surviving >or=1 year after radiosurgery were similar to previously reported actuarial estimates. Large metastases and metastases associated with extensive edema can be difficult to control by radiosurgery, particularly without WBRT.     

Stereotactic body frame based fractionated radiosurgery on consecutive days for primary or metastatic tumors in the lung

To evaluate the feasibility and treatment outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) using a stereotactic body frame (Precision Therapy™), we prospectively reviewed 34 tumors of the 28 patients with primary or metastatic intrathoracic lung tumors. Eligible patients included were nine with primary lung cancer and 19 with metastatic tumors from the lung, liver, and many other organs. A single dose of 10 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV) was delivered to a total dose of 30–40 Gy with three to four fractions. Four to eight coplanar or non-coplanar static fields were generated to adequately cover the planning target volume (PTV) as well as to exclude the critical structures as much as possible. More than 90% of the PTV was delivered the prescribed dose in the majority of cases (average; 96%, range; 74–100%). The mean PTV was 41.4 cm³ ranging from 4.4 to 230 cm³. Set-up error was within 5 mm in all directions (X, Y, Z axis). The response was evaluated by using a chest CT and/or ¹⁸FDG-PET scans after SRS treatment, 11 patients (39%) showed complete response, 12 (43%) partial response (decrease of more than 50% of the tumor volume), and four patients showed minimally decreased tumor volume or stable disease, but one patient showed progression disease. With a median follow-up period of 18 months, a local disease progression free interval was ranging from 7 to 35 months. Although all patients developed grade one radiation pneumonitis within 3 months, none had symptomatic or serious late complications after completing SRS treatment. Given these observations, it is concluded that the stereotactic body frame based SRS is a safe and effective treatment modality for the local management of primary or metastatic lung tumors. However, the optimum total dose and fractionation schedule used should be determined after the longer follow-up of these results.     

The CyberKnife®

Stereotactic radiosurgery has emerged as an accepted treatment for many types of intracranial tumors. Based on the understanding of the limitations of prior radiosurgical systems, image-guided robotic radiosurgery was developed to overcome many of these restrictions. The CyberKnife® is a commercially available frameless image-guided radiosurgical system that provides state-of-the-art radiosurgery for intracranial tumors, and has also revolutionized the use of radiosurgery to treat tumors in other parts of the body. This review focuses on the current use of the CyberKnife® to treat cranial and spinal tumors. Brain metastases have long been treated with other radiosurgical systems, but the CyberKnife® allows patients with brain metastases to be treated multiple times as successive tumors are discovered, without the repetitive placement of a stereotactic head frame. Benign tumors such as acoustic neuromas, pituitary tumors, and meningiomas are also easily treated with the CyberKnife®, with radiographic tumor-control rates of >90% for pituitary tumors and 95% for acoustic neuromas and meningiomas. A subset of meningiomas and pituitary tumors surround the optic nerves and are considered to be perioptic tumors. Historically, these tumors have not been treatable with radiosurgery because of the risk of visual loss. The frameless nature of the CyberKnife® allows the radiosurgery treatment to be delivered in separate stages (typically 24 hours apart); this has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of visual loss, and thus allows effective radiosurgery treatment to be delivered. Staged radiosurgery treatment has also been used at our institution to treat acoustic neuromas, with the understanding that several stages of radiation delivery may be associated with a higher level of hearing preservation than a single-staged radiosurgery treatment. Malignant gliomas and nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumors have historically been treated with conventional radiotherapy techniques. However, we have learnt that supplementing these radiotherapy treatments with a CyberKnife® stereotactic boost after radiotherapy can improve response rates to treatment. Spinal radiosurgery is a novel development; prior frame-based radiosurgery devices did not allow treatment of lesions outside the brain and neck. We have observed high rates of tumor control when treating benign spinal tumors with the CyberKnife®, and have noted excellent pain relief and tumor-control rates in patients with spinal metastases. Future CyberKnife® stereotactic applications will focus on the continual expansion of this technology to treat tumors outside the CNS, including cancers of the lung, pancreas, liver, and prostate.     

Treatment of brainstem metastases with gamma-knife radiosurgery

The aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of gamma-knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for treating brainstem metastases. The cases of 44 patients who underwent SRS as treatment for 46 brainstem metastases were retrospectively evaluated. The median age was 57 years (range 42–82 years) and the median Karnofsky performance score (KPS) was 80 (range 60–90). The primary tumor was lung carcinoma in 28 cases, breast carcinoma in 7 cases, colon carcinoma in 3 cases, renal cell carcinoma in 3 cases, malignant melanoma in 1 case, and unknown origin in 2 cases. Of the 46 metastases, 30 were in the pons, 14 were in the mesencephalon, and 2 were in the medulla oblongata. The median volume of the 46 metastases was 0.6 cc (range 0.34–7.3 cc). The median marginal dose of radiation was 16 Gy (range 10–20 Gy). Twenty-three patients (52 %) received whole brain radiotherapy prior to SRS, and 6 (14 %) received this therapy after SRS. In the remaining 15 cases (34 %), SRS was applied as the only treatment. Recursive partitioning analysis, graded prognostic assessment, and basic score for brain metastases were used to predict survival time. Local control was achieved for all but two of the 46 metastases (96 %). The overall survival time after SRS was 8 months. Female gender, KPS >70, mesencephalon tumor location, and response to treatment were associated with longer survival. Basic score for brain metastases class I and recursive partitioning analysis classification were associated with better prognosis. Peri-tumoral changes were detected radiologically at 2 (4 %) of the metastatic lesion sites but neither of these patients exhibited symptoms. Gamma-knife radiosurgery is effective for treating brainstem metastases without a higher risk for radiation necrosis.     

Linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases

Purpose: Melanoma is one of the most common malignancies to metastasize to the brain. Many patients with this disease will succumb to central nervous system (CNS) disease, highlighting the importance of effective local treatment of brain metastases for both palliation and survival of the disease. Our objective was to evaluate the outcomes associated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 54 patients with a total of 103 tumors treated with SRS. Twenty patients had prior surgical resection and nine patients underwent prior whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). 71% of patients had active extracranial disease at the time of SRS. Median number of tumors treated with SRS was 1(range: 1-6) with median radiosurgery tumor volume 2.1 cm 3 (range: 0.05-59.7 cm 3 ). The median dose delivered to the 80% isodose line was 24 Gy in a single fraction. Results: The median follow-up from SRS was five months (range:1-30 months). Sixty-five percent of patients had a follow-up MRI available for review. Actuarial local control at six months and 12 months was 87 and 68%, respectively. Eighty-one percent of patients developed new distant brain metastases at a median time of two months. The six-month and 12-month actuarial overall survival rates were 50 and 25%, respectively. The only significant predictor of overall survival was surgical resection prior to SRS. Post-SRS bleeding occurred in 18% of patients and at a median interval of 1.5 months. There was only one episode of radiation necrosis with no other treatment-related toxicity. Conclusion: SRS for brain metastases from melanoma is safe and achieves acceptable local control.     

RPA classification has prognostic significance for surgically resected single brain metastasis

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate prognostic factors that correlate with overall survival among patients with a surgically resected single brain metastasis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An Institutional Review Board-approved database of the Cleveland Clinic Brain Tumor Institute was queried for patients with a single brain metastasis treated by surgical resection between February 1984 and January 2004. The primary endpoint was overall survival from the date of surgery by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 271 patients were included. Statistically significant variables for improved survival on multivariate analysis included age <65 years, lack of extracranial metastases, control of primary tumor, histology (non-small-cell lung carcinoma), and use of stereotactic radiosurgery. The median survival for all patients was 10.2 months. Survival of patients in recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class 1 was better (21.4 months) than those in RPA class 2 (9.0 months, p < 0.001), RPA class 3 (8.9 months, p = 0.15), or the combined group of RPA classes 2 and 3 (9.0 months, p < 0.001). Patients had a median survival of 10.6 months after documented gross total resection and 8.7 months after subtotal resection, which approached statistical significance (p = 0.07). Those who were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery had a median survival of 17.1 months, which was greater than patients who were not treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (8.9 months, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports the prognostic significance of the RPA classification in patients with a single brain metastasis who undergo surgical resection and adjuvant therapy. RPA class 1 patients have a very favorable prognosis with a median survival of 21.4 months.     

The treatment of recurrent brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery

Between May 1986 and August 1989, we treated 18 patients with 21 recurrent or persistent brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery using a modified linear accelerator. To be eligible for radiosurgery, patients had to have a performance status of greater than or equal to 70% and have no evidence of (or stable) systemic disease. All but one patient had received prior radiotherapy, and were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery at the time of recurrence. Polar lesions were treated only if the patient had undergone and failed previous complete surgical resection (10 patients). Single doses of radiation (900 to 2,500 cGy) were delivered to limited volumes (less than 27 cm3) using a modified 6MV linear accelerator. The most common histology of the metastatic lesion was carcinoma of the lung (seven patients), followed by carcinoma of the breast (four patients), and melanoma (four patients). With median follow-up of 9 months (range, 1 to 39), all tumors have been controlled in the radiosurgery field. Two patients failed in the immediate margin of the treated volume and were subsequently treated with surgery and implantation of 125I to control the disease. Radiographic response was dramatic and rapid in the patients with adenocarcinoma, while slight reduction and stabilization occurred in those patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and sarcoma. The majority of patients improved neurologically following treatment, and were able to be withdrawn from corticosteroid therapy. Complications were limited and transient in nature and no cases of symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in any patient despite previous exposure to radiotherapy. Stereotactic radiosurgery is an effective and relatively safe treatment for recurrent solitary metastases and is an appealing technique for the initial management of deep-seated lesions as a boost to whole brain radiotherapy.     

Influence of gamma knife radiosurgery on the quality of life in patients with brain metastases

Quality of life (QOL) is an important issue in the treatment of patients with brain metastases. With median survival times often less than 4 months, less invasive treatment options that maximize QOL parameters are essential. In recent years, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been commonly used as a noninvasive alternative to surgical resection for such patients. This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate QOL in patients undergoing SRS for brain metastases. Between 1999 and 2000, 20 patients with metastatic disease to the brain were evaluated and treated in our Gamma Knife unit. All patients performed the Spitzer QOL survey (10-point scale) both before stereotactic radiosurgery and at each follow-up visit. Primary sites of disease included lung (n = 10), breast (n = 5), melanoma (n = 2), thyroid (n = 1), uterine (n = 1), and kidney (n = 1). Fifteen (75%) had prior whole brain radiotherapy (median dose: 35 Gy). The median age and Karnofsky Performance Status were 58 years and 80, respectively. The median Spitzer score before SRS was 9 (range: 7-10), and the median follow-up time of the patients in this series was 7 months. The median posttreatment Spitzer score at 1 and 3 months after SRS was 9 (range: 5-10) and 8 (range: 4-10), respectively. Crude intracranial tumor control in this cohort of patients was 90%. Extracranial tumor progression was noted in 8 patients (40%), and in these patients, Spitzer scores tended to decrease in value. In those patients who had no evidence of intracranial or extracranial tumor progression, Spitzer scores remained either unchanged or improved. Gamma knife SRS is an appropriate treatment modality for maintaining QOL parameters in patients with brain metastases. Tumor progression both intracranially and extracranially influences QOL parameters. Confirmation of this finding will require further investigation.     

The role of radiosurgery in the management of malignant brain tumors

Opinion statement Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides the means for creating lesions in deep-seated areas of the brain inaccessible to invasive surgery, using single high doses of focused ionizing radiation, administered using stereotactic guidance. It is a surgical technique designed to produce a specific radiobiological effect within a sharply defined target region in a single treatment session. Its technical application requires a stereotactic coordinate system, highly accurate patient repositioning (usually fixed), and multiple convergent beams of photon radiation. SRS appears to provide no benefit in the upfront treatment of newly diagnosed malignant gliomas but may be used to effectively palliate small well-demarcated volumes of recurrent disease. For selected patients with brain metastases treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), the addition of SRS improves median survival. In selected patients with brain metastases, it is also rational to withhold WBRT in favor of radiosurgery alone, with WBRT reserved for salvage without a decrease in median survival time.