Evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography compared with conventional digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVE: To compare retrospectively high-resolution contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with centric k-space filling and digital subtraction angiography in the assessment of degree of carotid artery stenosis. METHODS: Two neuroradiologists independently evaluated 14 carotid arteries (in 7 patients), and the degree of carotid stenosis determined was compared to calculate interobserver reliability. Thirty-six carotid arteries (in 18 patients) were then assessed with both contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography. The degree of stenosis was determined by consensus, and the findings of the 2 modalities were compared. RESULTS: Close interobserver agreement was found with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.98 (95% confidence interval 0.95-0.99). Sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 91% were found for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography detection of surgically significant carotid stenosis compared with digital subtraction angiography. The Spearman rank correlation test also found a significant correlation (R(s) = 0.90, p < 0.001) in the comparison of the classifications of degree of carotid artery stenosis. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography shows excellent correlation with digital subtraction angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery disease and has the potential to replace it in the assessment of degree of carotid artery stenosis.     

Technical requirements, biophysical considerations and protocol optimization with magnetic resonance angiography using blood-pool agents

In order to maximize the potential benefits of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, careful attention must be paid to the choice of hardware, data acquisition and processing, and to the choice of contrast agent. Typically, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography uses parallel-imaging techniques, which shorten the acquisition time, enhance spatial resolution and reduce artefacts. The timing of data acquisition is crucial for maximal enhancement of the arteries: for optimal arterial depiction, the centre of k-space should be acquired at the time of peak concentration of contrast agent in the arterial bed being investigated, and a number of k-space acquisition techniques are available to achieve this. SENSE or GRAPPA techniques can be used to facilitate parallel-imaging reconstruction of either the image data or k-space data, respectively. Gadolinium contrast agents shorten the proton relaxation times (most importantly T1) of blood, thereby increasing the signal-to-noise ratio and enhancing differentiation between blood vessels and other tissues. The blood-pool (intravascular) contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) is reversibly protein-bound in human plasma. This results in a marked increase in relaxivity, and hence a strong T1 shortening effect compared with other gadolinium-based contrast agents. Furthermore, the blood retention time of gadofosveset trisodium is substantially prolonged compared with conventional contrast agents. As a result, gadofosveset trisodium permits both first-pass and steady-state imaging.     

Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography with blood-pool agents

Although often asymptomatic, peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is associated with significant morbidity in a large proportion of patients. Atherosclerosis is the underlying pathology in many instances, involving the whole arterial tree. Whole-body magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) permits rapid, non-invasive and accurate evaluation of the entire vascular system and can be used for both diagnostic purposes and monitoring of vascular involvement in diseases such as diabetes, Marfan's syndrome and Takayasu arteritis. MRA has been used successfully in the identification of high-grade stenosis in PAD, abnormalities of the ileocaval veins and carotid plaque imaging. Carotid disease is significantly correlated with severe coronary artery disease and renal artery atherosclerosis. Symptomatic lesions in one vascular bed are often related to additional asymptomatic atherosclerotic lesions in other vascular regions. MRA may be advantageous over computed tomographic angiography because it can be performed with contrast media virtually devoid of serious toxicity and without utilization of ionizing radiation. Display of the entire arterial vasculature can be achieved in <90 s, with excellent sensitivity and specificity. Recent technological advances, such as parallel imaging and the implementation of dedicated matrix coils, have further increased image quality, and in combination with the blood-pool contrast agents, such as gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany), extended imaging time, higher spatial resolution and larger anatomical coverage can be achieved.     

Carotid plaque formation and its evaluation with angiography,ultrasound, and MR angiography

The accurate assessment of carotid artery disease is an important challenge for magnetic resonance (MR) angiography. Studies indicate that the detection and grading of stenosis and the evaluation of plaque morphology are all important steps in the clinical assessment of atherosclerosis. The prevalence of significant carotid artery stenosis in the elderly population and even in patients with symptoms of carotid artery disease is low; clinical risk seems to correlate more closely with plaque morphology and surface characterization than with the degree of stenosis. This highlights the importance of MR angiography and ultrasound, which can help characterize plaque morphology in addition to showing the degree of stenosis. The authors review the present understanding of plaque formation, comparisons of plaque imaging with conventional angiography, ultrasound, and MR angiography, and recent progress in MR angiography techniques. Several studies, including the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial, are discussed regarding the current objectives of carotid artery imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of plaque detection and morphologic evaluation continue to improve.     

Karotisendarteriektomie und Karotisstenting Pilotstudie eines prospektiven, randomisierten und kontrollierten Vergleichs

INTRODUCTION: A prospective, randomized and controlled trial is conducted to compare carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting in high grade symptomatic carotid artery stenoses. METHODS: According to the study design symptomatic patients with a angiographically high-grade (> or = 70%) internal carotid artery stenosis are included. Pre- and postinterventional diagnostics during the hospitalization period includes neurological assessment, duplex sonography of the cervical and cerebral arteries and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Follow-up examinations are scheduled after 1, 6 and 12 months and consist of a neurological assessment and duplex sonography. After 12 months selective angiography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain will be performed additionally. During a period of 9 months up to now 23/137 patients treated for a carotid artery stenosis were included in the study, 11 patients underwent surgery and 12 patients carotid stenting. RESULTS: Carotid stenting and endarterectomy was primarily successful without residual stenosis > 30% in each patient without the occurrence of stroke or death. In 18 follow-up examinations (neurological assessment including duplex sonography) of 13 patients (13 follow-up examinations after 30 days, 5 after 6 months) no relevant restenosis and no stroke occurred. CONCLUSION: As of yet, carotid stenting was a safe procedure. Due to the small number of patients a definitive conclusion can not be drawn.     

First-pass whole-body magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using the blood-pool contrast medium gadofosveset trisodium: comparison to gadopentetate dimeglumine

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate gadofosveset trisodium for first-pass magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the setting of whole-body MRA (WB-MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were examined using either 10 mL gadofosveset trisodium (n = 20) or 30 mL gadopentetate dimeglumine (n = 20), followed by arterial-phase imaging of 4 consecutive anatomic regions. Signal intensity was measured in 2 vessels per region. Relative contrast values (RC) were calculated. Arterial contrast, venous overlay, and image quality were rated by 2 radiologists. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to test for significance. RESULTS: Compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadofosveset trisodium enhanced imaging revealed higher RC values in 2 vessel regions, with the differences being significant in 3 of 4 vessel segments. Gadofosveset trisodium revealed lower RC values in 2 regions with significant differences in 2 segments. Qualitative evaluation revealed higher ratings for gadofosveset trisodium regarding all 3 criteria with significant differences in 2 regions. CONCLUSIONS: Gadofosveset trisodium serves well for first-pass imaging in WB-MRA.     

High-spatial-resolution multistation MR angiography with parallel imaging and blood pool contrast agent: initial experience

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of reader detection of 75% or greater stenosis at high-spatial-resolution multistation magnetic resonance (MR) angiography performed with matrix coils and a blood pool contrast agent. Ten healthy volunteers and 10 patients were examined. All participants provided informed consent to participate in this institutional review board-approved study. For contrast agent-enhanced multistation MR angiography, an albumin-binding gadolinium chelate, gadofosveset trisodium, was used. Imaging was performed during the first-pass and steady-state phases of the contrast agent. Vessel conspicuity on the first-pass MR angiograms obtained in both volunteers and patients was rated as excellent for 93% of vessels. At steady-state imaging, vessel conspicuity was rated as excellent or good for 89% of vessels. Gadofosveset trisodium-enhanced MR angiography yielded sensitivities of 100% and 97% and specificities of 96% and 97% for detection of significant disease in the carotid and lower extremity arteries, respectively.     

Application of blood-pool agents in visualization of peripheral vessels

Effective arterial imaging is essential in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) in whom a revascularization procedure is planned. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has traditionally been regarded as the gold standard for imaging in peripheral arterial disease, but this technique is subject to certain limitations, such as the risks of adverse reactions associated with arterial catheterization and iodinated contrast agents. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is now recommended as an effective and useful imaging technique in peripheral arterial disease, since it offers high enhanced contrast between blood and stationary tissue and fast acquisition times. However, extracellular gadolinium contrast agents rapidly diffuse into the interstitial spaces, and thus are suitable only for first-pass imaging. This limitation can be overcome by the use of blood-pool (intravascular) contrast agents, such as gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany), which are retained within the blood vessels and hence facilitate both first-pass and steady-state imaging with high spatial resolution. Blood-pool agents, therefore, offer improved imaging, particularly of distal vessels, compared with extracellular contrast agents. Examples of first-pass and steady-state imaging with gadofosveset are presented.     

Carotid stenosis in the real world--can Doppler ultrasound replace angiography in a district general hospital setting?

Large trials have confirmed the benefit of carotid endarterectomy in the prevention of stroke in patients with transient ischaemic attacks and > or =70% stenosis of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery. Invasive confirmatory angiography carries some risk, but these patients can be identified by Doppler ultrasound. Non-invasive confirmatory testing with spiral computed tomographic angiography or magnetic resonance angiography is not easily available in many hospitals. In this study, criteria have been developed for use in this unit to identify significant carotid artery stenosis and enable selection for surgery after Doppler ultrasound alone, with known degrees of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Carotid arteriography is reserved for a minority of cases.     

Selection of patients for carotid thromboendarterectomy: the role of magnetic resonance angiography

It has been shown in clinical trials that patients with high grade symptomatic carotid stenosis benefit from carotid thromboendarterectomy. Because of the invasiveness and the costs of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, the current standard of reference for the grading of carotid stenosis, magnetic resonance angiography, has become a technique of utmost interest for evaluation of the carotid arteries. The time-of-flight and the newly developed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography techniques are discussed. At present, we recommend computer enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for screening procedures and for the post-operative follow-up. For pre-operative evaluation we still recommend intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.     

Non-invasive assessment of neck-vessel pathology

Clinical trials (NASCET, ECTS) have shown that carotid endarterectomy is protective against stroke in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. To decrease costs and risks, new diagnostic tools have been developed, such as duplex ultrasound (DUS), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), and more recently computed tomography angiography (CTA). CTA and MRA provide excellent 3D angiography images of the extracranial vessels, using a volume-rendering technique. Digitally subtracted MRA (DSA-MRA) obtained with high-speed acquisitions during gadolinium injection has also recently become available. These techniques are changing the role of non-invasive assessment of carotid stenosis. Although it is probably too early to assess a definite diagnostic algorithm, the use of DSA as a pre-surgical tool for defining carotid stenosis is rapidly decreasing. Received: 9 February 1998; Accepted: 13 February 1998     

短暂性脑缺血发作时磁共振血管成像病变特点

 目的 探讨短暂性脑缺血发作（transient ischemic attacks,TIA）时磁共振血管成像病变特点。方法 选取我院收治的60例TIA患者,行磁共振血管成像检查颅内动脉、颈部动脉,分析患者颅颈部供血动脉病变特点、狭窄情况。结果 磁共振检查发现脑供血动脉狭窄患者53例(88.33%),未见异常者7例（11.67%）。其中,颈内动脉系统发现病变者40例(75.47%),椎基底动脉系统发现病变者13例（24.53%）。不同动脉系统的病变在颅内外的分布无统计学差异（χ²=4.94,P=0.08470）。53例发生狭窄病例中,共有病变动脉92支,其中轻度狭窄20支,中度32支,重度38支,2支闭塞;按发生支数依次排序为颈内动脉、大脑中动脉、椎动脉、颈总动脉、基底动脉、大脑前动脉起始段、大脑后动脉。结论 磁共振技术诊断TIA客观,综合患者临床情况对于制定治疗方案具有重要的临床意义。     

Correlation of cine MR velocity measurements in the internal carotid artery with collateral flow in the circle of willis: Preliminary study

The velocity-phase relationship intrinsic to phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiography permits the quantitative and qualitative assessment of blood flow. The ability to measure velocity and vessel cross-sectional area allows noninvasive assessment of volume flow rate (VFR) in the internal carotid artery (ICA). Phase-contrast techniques also demonstrate flow direction. Using two-dimensional cine phase-contrast angiography, the authors evaluated VFR in the ICA and collateral flow about the circle of Willis in 15 patients with ischemic neurologic symptoms. The VFR in each carotid artery was correlated with the degree of stenosis and presence or absence of abnormal circle of Willis collateral flow. There was a correlation between a decrease in VFR and abnormal circle of Willis collateral flow. In addition, a correlation between severe stenosis and a decrease in VFR was found. In patients with ischemic neurologic symptoms without severe stenosis (<70% diameter stenosis), no decrease in VFR was seen. It is hoped that flow quantification and directional flow imaging with phase-contrast angiography will help further characterize carotid artery occlusive disease by enabling assessment of VFR changes associated with ischemic neurologic symptoms. This study also supports the hypothesis that two mechanisms-hemodynamic and embolic-play a role in ischemic neurologic symptoms.     

Is carotid duplex scanning sufficient as the sole investigation prior to carotid endarterectomy?

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the accepted treatment for certain patients who have had, or who are at risk of having, a stroke if they have a significant narrowing of the internal carotid artery. Rapid and accurate classification of the degree of stenosis is important as the benefit of surgery is highly dependent on this. The aim of this study was to assess whether the addition of angiography to duplex scanning resulted in a change in patient management in a unit where duplex scanning was used as the sole imaging investigation prior to CEA. The study population consisted of 64 patients with significant internal carotid artery stenosis on duplex scanning who were suitable for, and wished to be considered for, CEA. All patients underwent an angiogram. In this study 9 (14%) patients did not proceed to surgery on the basis of angiography and in a further 11 (17%) patients insufficient views of the distal vessel were obtained on duplex scanning. Three of these patients had extensive disease which excluded surgery. One patient experienced a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) at the time of angiography. In conclusion, this audit has highlighted the limitations in performing duplex scanning alone, and the costs that this can incur on the patient who may undergo an unnecessary operation. We cannot recommend duplex scanning as the sole investigation prior to CEA. There is need to evaluate the role of additional non-invasive carotid imaging such as magnetic resonance angiography or CT angiography in the assessment of these patients.     

MRA of the foot with a blood pool agent

Foot complications associated with diabetes are the most common cause of non-traumatic lower-extremity amputations in the industrialised countries. Revascularisation techniques require precise preoperative imaging. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) has the potential to detect significantly more patent pedal vessel segments than selective digital substractive angiography (DSA) in an examination with two blinded readers. MRI and MRA are the imaging methods of choice for differentiated assessment of the diabetic foot and its complications, and they are robust techniques for delineating the pedal macrocirculation. Therefore, they should play a central role in the management of patients with a diabetic foot syndrome.     

Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography with digital subtraction angiography

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography and extracranial color-coded duplex sonography are noninvasive, preoperative imaging modalities for evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Innovative techniques and improvements in image quality require frequent reassessment of accuracy, reliability, and diagnostic value compared with those of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography compared with DSA for detection of high-grade carotid artery stenoses. METHODS: Four readers, blinded to clinical symptoms and the outcome of other studies, independently evaluated stenoses on contrast-enhanced MR angiograms in 71 vessels of 39 symptomatic patients. Duplex sonography was also performed in all vessels. The severity of stenosis was defined according to North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial criteria (0-29%, 30-69%, 70-99%, 100%). Results of both modalities were compared with the corresponding DSA findings. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced MR angiography had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.9% and 79.1%, respectively, for the identification of carotid artery stenoses of 70% or greater. Sensitivity and specificity of duplex sonography were 92.9% and 81.9%, respectively. Combining data from both tests revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 81.4%, respectively, for concordant results (80% of vessels). CONCLUSION: Concordant results of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography increase the diagnostic sensitivity to 100%. The reliability of MR angiography is comparable to that of DSA. The combination of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex sonography might be preferable over DSA for preoperative evaluation in most patients, thus reducing the risk of perioperative morbidity and improving the overall outcome.     

Redistribution of cerebropetal blood flow in patients with carotid artery stenosis measured non-invasively with fast cine phase contrast MR angiography

The purpose was to evaluate the blood flow redistribution in the neck vessels of patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Eighty-six patients with ICA stenosis underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) and fast 2D phase contrast (2D-PC) sequence to measure the mean blood flow (MBF) of ICA, basilar artery (BA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA). CEMRA revealed 53 severe stenoses, 45 moderate stenoses and 3 occluded vessels. Patients with a unilateral severe ICA stenosis had a significantly reduced MBF of the ICA compared to the control group; the MBF reduction of the severely stenosed ICA was less conspicuous if associated with a controlateral severe stenosis. The MBF of the BA increased significantly in the presence of the bilateral severe ICA stenosis and in the ICA occlusion. The MBF of the MCA was unchanged in the presence of various degrees of ICA stenosis. Measurement of MBF with fast PC MRA permits cerebropethal blood flow assessment and gives additional information in grading ICA stenosis. The reduced MBF of a severe ICA stenosis has to be considered with caution since it depends also on the status of the controlateral ICA and may be considered a confident parameter only in case of unilateral carotid stenosis.     

Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis

AIM: To compare the accuracy of ultrasound and two magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic techniques with catheter angiography in assessing atherosclerosis at the carotid bifurcation.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis were studied by Doppler ultrasound, time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography and conventional catheter angiography. The degree of stenosis found on ultrasound and MR angiography was compared with the results of catheter angiography. Four different assessment methods were conducted for the MR angiographic data. Kappa, sensitivity and specificity (with confidence intervals) values were calculated for the US and MR angiography results compared to catheter angiography.RESULTS: Catheter angiography showed 12 internal carotid artery occlusions (15%), 34 severe (44%), 12 moderate (15%) and 20 mild stenoses (26%), using NASCET criteria.Ultrasound showed 65% sensitivity and 95% specificity in detecting surgically amenable lesions, whilst the MR angiographic techniques had sensitivities varying from 82-100%, and specificities from 95-100%.A moderate kappa value was calculated for the US data, whilst all MR techniques were found to show very good agreement with catheter angiography.CONCLUSION: This data suggests that MR angiography is more accurate than Doppler ultrasound in defining surgical lesions and has comparable accuracy to catheter angiography. The use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography is useful in certain situations but is not essential in all cases.     

Magnetic resonance angiography with blood-pool contrast agents: future applications

Blood pool agents remain in the intravascular space for a longer time period. Therefore the optimal imaging window for vascular structures is widened to about 30 minutes. Gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany) is the first blood-pool contrast agent approved in Europe for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of vessels in the abdomen, pelvis and lower extremity in adults. Other possible applications of blood-pool agents are now being considered, such as assessment of venous thromboembolism, coronary artery disease or sinus venous thrombosis. Perfusion MR imaging holds promise for detecting lung perfusion defects with higher spatial resolution and reduced scan time compared with radionuclide scintigraphy. In coronary artery disease, blood-pool agents enable a substantial increase in the quality of coronary artery imaging. Quantitative myocardial perfusion and myocardial viability seem to be possible, although modifications in protocols and sequence design are necessary for optimal results. Other novel applications of blood-pool agents include monitoring of inflammatory changes in systemic lupus erythematosus and evaluation of tumour invasion into lymph nodes and more reliable assessment of cerebral venous and sinus thombosis.     

Carotid arteries: contrast-enhanced US angiography--preliminary clinical experience

B-mode ultrasonographic (US) angiography enhanced with a microbubble-based US contrast agent (FS069) was evaluated in human subjects with carotid artery disease. Results at contrast material-enhanced US angiography and duplex US were compared with those at conventional angiography. Both US angiography and duplex US accurately depicted stenoses of 70% or more compared with those depicted at conventional angiography. The percentage diameter stenosis of the internal carotid artery measured at US angiography strongly correlated with that measured at conventional angiography (r = 0.988). The percentage area stenosis measured at US angiography strongly correlated with ex vivo measurements of the resected carotid plaque at magnetic resonance imaging (r = 0.979). US angiography depicted unsuspected wall irregularities, ulceration, and dissection.