Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine using a basal‐bolus regimen in a randomized,controlled clinical study in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

This treat‐to‐target study compared the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir (IDet) and insulin glargine (IGla) in a basal‐bolus (insulin aspart) regimen in type 2 diabetes.

Methods

385 patients were randomized 2 : 1 (IDet : IGla). Non‐inferiority of IDet to IGla was determined by HbA_1c 95% CI upper limit <0.4.

Results

IDet and IGla showed similar efficacy in HbA_1c reduction at 26 weeks, as the non‐inferiority criterion was met at 26 weeks (LS mean [Det–Gla]: 0.207; 95% CI: 0.0149,0.3995). It appeared that IGla in some cases did better than IDet in terms of HbA_1c, but the difference (0.207%) was not clinically meaningful. Based on the CONSORT guideline, non‐inferiority analysis using the LOCF approach was inconclusive regarding possible inferiority of delta 0.4 (LS mean of [Det–Gla]: 0.307; 95% CI: 0.1023, 0.5109). HbA_1c decreased significantly from baseline in IDet (?1.1% [26 weeks], ?0.9% [LOCF], p < 0.001) and in IGla (?1.3% [26 weeks, LOCF], p < 0.001). Final HbA_1c were 7.1% (26 weeks) and 7.3% (LOCF) in IDet, and 6.9% (26 weeks) and 7.0% (LOCF) in IGla. Final FPG were 130 mg/dL (26 weeks) and 135 mg/dL (LOCF) in IDet, and 134 mg/dL (26 weeks) and 137 mg/dL (LOCF) in IGla. There was significantly less weight gain in IDet‐treated patients (1.2 ± 3.96 kg versus 2.7 ± 3.94 kg, p = 0.001). Hypoglycemia risk was comparable between groups. The majority of IDet‐treated patients (87.4%) remained on a once‐daily basal insulin regimen throughout the study.

Conclusions

IDet and IGla were both effective and safe treatments for glycemic control in a basal‐bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes. Clinically significant reductions in HbA_1c were achieved in both groups, but with significantly less weight gain in the IDet group at comparable basal insulin dosage. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

     

Replacement of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin with the long‐acting insulin analogue,detemir, improves glycemic control without weight gain in basal–bolus insulin therapy in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes

Aims/Introduction: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of replacing neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) with the long‐acting insulin analogue, detemir, in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We carried out a retrospective study to compare the effects of replacing NPH with detemir in basal–bolus insulin therapy in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes. A total of 19 patients were enrolled in the study, and changes in hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c), insulin dose, bodyweight, fasting blood glucose levels (FBG), within‐patient variability in FBG and prevalence in hypoglycemia were monitored for 12 weeks before replacement and during three periods after replacement; 1–12 weeks (period 1), 13–24 weeks (period 2) and 25–36 weeks (period 3). Results: HbA_1c values improved significantly in periods 2 and 3. Despite the total insulin dose remaining unchanged throughout the study, the basal insulin dose increased from 0.24 to 0.27 IU/kg/day in period 2 and 0.28 IU/kg/day in period 3. Bodyweight decreased from 61.8 to 60.8 kg in period 1, whereas FBG improved throughout the study. Within‐patient variability in FBG was lower with detemir treatment than with NPH, despite the number of hypoglycemic episodes increasing significantly after replacement. Conclusions: These findings show that the weight loss observed in patients was independent of the reduction in calorie intake resulting from less frequent hypoglycemic attacks. In Japanese patients with diabetes who received NPH, replacing NPH with detemir led to improvements in glycemic control without any weight gain. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00066.x, 2010)     

Current status of insulin degludec in type 1 and type 2 diabetes based on randomized and observational trials

Insulin degludec is a new ultra-long-action basal insulin. Using treat-to-target protocols, controlled trials have shown comparable HbA_1c reductions with insulin degludec and comparators in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Most studies identify, however, better control of fasting plasma glucose with insulin degludec vs. either insulin glargine U100 or detemir, and all have consistently demonstrated clinically relevant decreases in (nocturnal) hypoglycaemic episodes. These characteristics have provided added therapeutic value for insulin degludec in clinical practice. Thus, the aim of this review is to discuss, within the context of randomized and observational studies, the clinical effects of insulin degludec use in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.     

地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素联合短效胰岛素治疗2型糖尿病的疗效观察

目的探讨地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素联合短效胰岛素对2型糖尿病患者的疗效。方法90例2型糖尿病患者分别应用地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素联合短效胰岛素治疗,比较3组治疗前后空腹血糖、餐后2h血糖、胰岛素用量及低血糖发生率。结果3组血糖均下降,但地特胰岛素组降糖效果更明显,且低血糖发生率低。结论与甘精胰岛素、中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素相比,地特胰岛素治疗新诊断的2型糖尿病疗效更好,低血糖发生率较低。     

Comparison of insulin degludec with insulin detemir in type 1 diabetes: a 1‐year treat‐to‐target trial

The long‐term safety and tolerability of insulin degludec (IDeg) was compared with that of insulin detemir (IDet), as basal treatment in participants with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In the present multinational, 26‐week core + 26‐week extension, controlled, open‐label, parallel‐group trial, adults with T1DM were randomized to IDeg or IDet as basal insulin treatment combined with meal‐time bolus insulin aspart. IDeg was administered once daily, whilst IDet was administered once or twice daily depending on patients' glycaemic control. After 1 year, IDeg provided a 33% lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with IDet: estimated rate ratio (IDeg : IDet) 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51; 0.88]; p < 0.05. IDeg improved glycated haemoglobin after 1 year of treatment, similarly to IDet, but IDeg also provided a significantly greater reduction in fasting plasma glucose compared with IDet: estimated difference (IDeg ? IDet) ?1.11 (95% CI ?1.83; ?0.40) mmol/l; p < 0.05. The present study confirmed the long‐term safety and tolerability profile of IDeg in patients with T1DM. IDeg provided a lower risk of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia than IDet.     

Comparison of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in subjects with Type 1 diabetes using intensive insulin therapy.

AIMS: To compare glycaemic control and risk of hypoglycaemia of twice-daily insulin detemir with once-daily insulin glargine in subjects with Type 1 diabetes. METHODS: In this 26-week, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial, 320 subjects with Type 1 diabetes received either insulin detemir twice daily or insulin glargine once daily. each in combination with premeal insulin aspart. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, HbA(1c) had decreased from 8.8 to 8.2% in the insulin detemir group and from 8.7 to 8.2% in the insulin glargine group. Home-measured fasting plasma glucose (PG) was lower with insulin glargine than with insulin detemir (7.0 vs. 7.7 mmol/l, P < 0.001). The overall shape of the home-measured nine-point PG profiles was comparable between treatments (P = 0.125). Overall, there was no significant difference in within-subject variation in PG (P = 0.437). Within-subject variation in predinner PG was lower with insulin detemir than with insulin glargine (P < 0.05). The overall risk of hypoglycaemia was similar with no differences in confirmed hypoglycaemia. However, the risk of severe and nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 72% and 32%, respectively, lower with insulin detemir than with insulin glargine (P < 0.05). Body weight gain was not significantly different comparing insulin detemir and insulin glargine (0.52 kg vs. 0.96 kg, P = 0.193). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with twice-daily insulin detemir or once-daily insulin glargine, each in combination with insulin aspart, resulted in similar glycaemic control. The overall risk of hypoglycaemia was comparable, whereas the risks of both severe and nocturnal hypoglycaemia were significantly lower with insulin detemir.     

Comparative clinical outcomes of insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL after switching from other basal insulins in real‐world patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes

Aims/IntroductionTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla300) 6 months after switching from other basal insulins by assessing the changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), and insulin doses in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a real‐world clinical setting.Materials and MethodsA total of 307 patients with type 1 diabetes and 294 patients with type 2 diabetes with HbA1c >7.0% were studied. Adjusted mean changes in HbA1c, BMI, and insulin doses were compared between IDeg (IDeg group) and Gla300 (Gla300 group) switchers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to examine whether the IDeg or Gla300 group was associated with HbA1c or insulin dose reduction and BMI gain.ResultsHbA1c was significantly decreased in both the IDeg and Gla300 groups. Adjusted mean changes in HbA1c (approximately −0.3% and −0.5% in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes patients, respectively) and BMI were similar between both groups. The mean change in insulin dose was slightly larger for dose reduction in the IDeg group than in the Gla300 group. Multivariable logistic regression models showed that the IDeg group was significantly associated with insulin dose reduction after adjusting for basal insulin type, insulin dose, and number of basal insulin injections at baseline and other confounding factors.ConclusionsThe current study suggested that IDeg and Gla300 have similar effects in reducing HbA1c and gaining BMI after switching from other basal insulins in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. IDeg selection was associated with insulin dose reduction.     

Once-daily insulin detemir is comparable to once-daily insulin glargine in providing glycaemic control over 24 h in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study

Once-daily dosing with insulin detemir and insulin glargine were compared in a double-blind, randomised, crossover study in type 2 diabetes subjects previously treated with other antihyperglycaemic medications. Blood glucose was measured through continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Insulin dose was adjusted daily during the titration phase to achieve target blood glucose values of (70-120 mg/dL) during the basal period, defined as 2400–0600 hours. The last meal of the day started at 1800 h and basal insulin was injected at 2000 h. The CGM data for a 24-h period on the second consecutive day after achieving target blood glucose levels were compared between treatments. Twenty-nine subjects completed the study. Over a 24-h measurement period, once-daily dosing with insulin detemir provided glycaemic control very similar to that of once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes after both had been titrated to the same glucose target. Insulin detemir- and insulin glargine-treated subjects had similar mean 24-h glucose values (133 ± 21 mg/dL compared with 126±20 mg/dL respectively, p = 0.385) and similar glucose values during the basal period (105 ± 23 mg/dL compared with 98 ± 19 mg/dL, respectively p = 0.204).Target basal glycaemic control was achieved in all subjects in a mean of 3.8 days for detemir and 3.5 days for glargine (p = 0.360). The mean dose of detemir was similar to that of glargine (26.3 and 26.6 units/day, respectively, p = 0.837). In this study, once-daily dosing of insulin detemir provided 24-h glycaemic control similar to that of insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

Insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in insulin‐naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: A 26‐week,randomized, controlled,Pan‐Asian,treat‐to‐target trial

Introduction

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is an ultra‐long‐acting basal insulin with a consistent action profile of >42 h. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of IDeg with insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin‐naïve Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.

Materials and Methods

In this multinational, 26‐week, open‐label, treat‐to‐target trial, 435 participants (202 females, 233 males; mean age 58.6 years; mean body mass index 25 kg/m²; mean glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c] 8.5%) were randomized (2:1) to IDeg or IGlar, each administered once daily with ≥1 oral antidiabetic drug(s) (OAD).

Results

After 26 weeks, HbA_1c had decreased by 1.24 and 1.35% in the IDeg and IGlar groups, respectively (treatment difference [IDeg – IGlar] 0.11%, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.03 to 0.24), confirming non‐inferiority. Rates of overall confirmed hypoglycemia were similar for IDeg and IGlar during the full trial period (3.0 vs 3.7 episodes/patient‐year of exposure [PYE]; rate ratio [RR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.11, P = 0.20), but significantly lower (by 37%) for IDeg during the maintenance period (from week 16 onward; RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.94, P = 0.02). No significant difference in the rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia was found between IDeg and IGlar in the full trial period (0.8 vs 1.2 episodes/PYE; RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.04, P = 0.07) or maintenance period (RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.00, P = 0.05). Adverse event rates were similar between treatments.

Conclusions

Initiating insulin therapy with IDeg in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled with OADs, provides similar improvements in long‐term glycemic control to IGlar, but at a significantly lower rate of overall confirmed hypoglycemia once stable glycemic control and insulin dosing are achieved. This trial was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (no. NCT01059799).     

A randomised, 52-week,treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine when administered as add-on to glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes

Aims/hypothesis This 52-week multinational, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared clinical outcomes following supplementation of oral glucose-lowering drugs with basal insulin analogues detemir and glargine in type 2 diabetic patients. Methods Insulin-naive adults (n = 582, HbA_1c 7.5–10.0%, BMI ≤ 40.0 kg/m²) were randomised 1:1 to receive insulin detemir or glargine once daily (evening) actively titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤ 6.0 mmol/l. An additional morning insulin detemir dose was permitted if pre-dinner plasma glucose (PG) was >7.0 mmol/l after achieving FPG < 7.0 mmol/l. Due to labelling restrictions, no second glargine dose was allowed. Results Baseline HbA_1c decreased from 8.6 to 7.2 and 7.1% (NS) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG improved from 10.8 to 7.1 and 7.0 mmol/l (NS), respectively. With detemir, 45% of participants completed the study on once daily dosing and 55% on twice daily dosing, with no difference in HbA_1c. Overall, 52% of participants achieved HbA_1c ≤ 7.0%: 33% (detemir) and 35% (glargine) without hypoglycaemia. Within-participant variability for self-monitored FPG and pre-dinner PG did not differ by insulin treatment, nor did the relative risk of overall or nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Modest reductions in weight gain were seen with detemir vs glargine in completers (3.0 vs 3.9 kg, p = 0.01) and in the intention-to-treat population (2.7 vs 3.5 kg, p = 0.03), primarily related to completers on once-daily detemir. Mean daily detemir dose was higher (0.78 U/kg [0.52 with once daily dosing, 1.00 U/kg with twice daily dosing]) than glargine (0.44 IU/kg). Injection site reactions were more frequent with detemir (4.5 vs 1.4%). Conclusions/interpretation Supplementation of oral agents with detemir or glargine achieves clinically important improvements in glycaemic control with low risk of hypoglycaemia. Non-inferiority was demonstrated for detemir using higher insulin doses (mainly patients on twice daily dosing); weight gain was somewhat reduced with once daily insulin detemir. ClinicalTrials.gov ID no.: NCT00283751. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorised users.     

Omitting breakfast and lunch after injection of different long-acting insulin preparations at bedtime: a prospective study in patients with type 2 diabetes

Aims/hypothesis  The aim of this prospective trial was to compare the effect of different long-acting insulin preparations injected at bedtime on glucose concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes omitting breakfast and lunch the next day. Methods  Twenty patients (ten women) with type 2 diabetes who were on an intensified insulin therapy participated. Mean (±SD) age was 63 ± 10 years, diabetes duration 18 ± 9 years, BMI 32.5 ± 5 kg/m², and HbA_1c 7.3 ± 0.7%. Patients received neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, insulin detemir or insulin glargine for at least 2 months; doses were adjusted to achieve morning blood glucose levels of <7 mmol/l. At the end of the respective treatment period, the long-acting insulin was injected at bedtime (at 22:45 hours) as usual but patients refrained from breakfast and lunch the next day; glucose was measured by a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). Results   Comparable glucose target ranges were reached at midnight (5.8 to 6.1 mmol/l) and at 07:00 hours (6.7 to 6.9 mmol/l) with all three insulin preparations, using mean doses of 29 ± 10 U (NPH insulin), 33 ± 13 U (insulin detemir), and 32 ± 12 U (insulin glargine). Glucose levels between midnight and 07:00 hours were not significantly different for the three insulin preparations. Symptomatic hypoglycaemia did not occur from 08:00 to 16:00 hours; glucose concentrations during this time were slightly lower with NPH insulin than with insulin detemir (p = 0.012) and insulin glargine (p = 0.049). Conclusions/interpretation  Following bedtime injection of NPH insulin or of the analogues insulin detemir or insulin glargine, fasting glucose <7 mmol/l was achieved in the morning, without subsequent hypoglycaemia when participants continued to fast during the day.