Nurse and midwifery prescribing in Ireland: A scope‐of‐practice development for worldwide consideration

For 10 years, select Irish nurses and midwives who pass a rigorous 6 month theory and practical program can prescribe medications and other medicinal products. Given the need for timely, accessible, and affordable health‐care services in all countries, this nursing/midwifery education and practice development is worthy of examination. Irish nurse/midwife prescribing occurred following long‐term deliberative nursing profession advocacy, nursing education planning, nursing administration and practice planning, interdisciplinary health‐care team support and complementary efforts, and government action. A review of documents, research, and other articles was undertaken to examine this development process and report evaluative information for consideration by other countries seeking to improve their health‐care systems. Nurse/midwife prescribing was accomplished successfully in Ireland, with the steps taken there to initiate and establish nurse/midwife prescribing of value internationally.     

Utilization of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a cross‐sectional baseline analysis in general practice

What is known and objective: Antithrombotics for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) are reportedly underutilised. Since the burden of care lies within general practice, attention must be paid to identifying and addressing practice gaps in this setting. The objective of this study was to determine the contemporary utilisation of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF within Australian general practice (GP). Methods: Data pertaining to AF patients’ (aged ≥65 years) were collected from GP surgeries in New South Wales, Australia, using purpose‐designed data collection forms; extracted data comprised patients’ medical histories, current pharmacotherapy, and relevant characteristics. Results and Discussion: Data pertaining to 393 patients (mean age 78·0 ± 7·0 years) were reviewed. Overall, most (98·5%) patients received antithrombotic therapy. Among the 387 patients using antithrombotics, most (94·1%) received mono‐therapy. “Warfarin ± antiplatelet” was most frequently used (81·7%); 77·5% used “warfarin” as a monotherapy, followed by “dabigatran ± clopidogrel” (11·6%), “aspirin” (5·9%) and “clopidogrel” alone (0·8%). High stroke risk and low bleeding risk were associated with increased use of “warfarin ± antiplatelet” therapy. Older patients (≥80 years) were more likely to receive ‘nil therapy’ (P = 0·04), and less likely to receive dual and triple antithrombotic therapy. Conclusion: We found an encouraging improvement compared to previous studies in the utilisation of antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in AF within general practice. Warfarin is now utilised as the mainstay therapy, followed by aspirin, although the novel oral anticoagulants are entering the spectrum of therapies used. Consideration needs to be given to the potential impact of the newer agents and their scope of use.     

Perception of nurse prescribing among nurses and psychiatrists in a developing country: A cross‐sectional survey

Nurse prescribing has the potential to improve patients’ access to, and experiences of, treatment. The aim of the present study was to examine nurse and psychiatrist attitudes about this extended role in a developing country. We conducted a cross‐sectional survey using a previously‐used, 65‐item, seven subscale measure of attitudes to nurse prescribing in mental health. We achieved a 79% response rate. The majority of participants had trained in developing countries where nurse prescribing has yet to be implemented. Across five subscales (general beliefs, impact, uses, training, and supervision), both groups reported positive attitudes about nurse prescribing. Both groups scored the training subscale particularly highly. Compared with psychiatrists, nurses were more confident about the range of clinical settings where nurse prescribing could be applied (e.g. acute inpatient and substance use). Although both groups had less favourable attitudes on the two subscales relating to clinical and legal responsibility, compared to nurses, psychiatrists were more undesirable. Although, overall, clinician attitudes do not seem to represent a barrier towards the potential implementation of nurse prescribing in the study setting, clarity about clinical and legal responsibility needs to be addressed.     

Chronic dialysis‐associated anaemia in end‐stage renal disease: analysis of management in two French centres

Background: Treatment of anaemia in renal‐insufficient patients relies on the use of an erythropoiesis‐stimulating agent (ESA). This study aimed to compare the impact of two different strategies of ESA prescribing on variation in haemoglobin (Hb) concentration in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Methods: Patients with ESRD, on haemodialysis, and who had received ESA for >3 months were recruited. Different parameters were analysed: demographics, Hb level the last day of the year before dialysis, the most recent weekly ESA dose, risk factors for resistance and cost. Each institution continued its local practice for achieving the desired Hb level: increasing the ESA dose to overcome resistance in one centre and defining an upper ESA‐dose limit in the other. Results: A total of 185 patients were recruited. No significant differences in the biological parameters were found between the two populations. In both centres, Hb levels were comparable and mean levels exceeded 11 g/dL, despite the higher ESA doses given in one centre to achieve this target. This finding also held true for the subgroups with greater than or equal to two resistance factors. These two strategies led to large between‐centre differences in treatment costs. Conclusion: The ESA‐use strategy difference probably indicates that erythropoietin‐resistance was not overcome with increased dosing. The Hb concentrations remained stable even when ESA doses were increased. On current evidence, the cheaper ESA‐dose limitation strategy is preferable but randomized controlled studies, including comparisons of alternative ESA formulations are necessary.