Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus conventional injection therapy in newly diagnosed diabetic children: two-year follow-up of a randomized, prospective trial

The effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), begun at diagnosis, on blood glucose control and endogenous insulin production was studied in a group of consecutively referred newly diagnosed diabetic children. In a random order, 15 children started CSII (age 9.5 +/- 4.2 (+/- SD) years) and 15 conventional injection therapy (age 7.0 +/- 3.6 years). For 2 years HbA1 and urinary C-peptide were measured monthly, C-peptide responses to glucagon 6-monthly, and insulin antibodies every 3 months. None of the patients requested change of therapy during the study period, but at 28 months 1 adolescent girl changed to injection therapy from CSII. Severe hypoglycaemia was observed once in each group, but ketoacidosis only once, in the injection therapy group. From 2 months after diagnosis onwards the CSII group had significantly lower HbA1 levels. Urinary and plasma C-peptide levels did not differ between the two groups and similar insulin doses were used throughout the study. At the end of the 2 years of therapy, the CSII group had significantly lower insulin antibody levels. The observations suggest that CSII is well accepted in newly diagnosed children and improves metabolic control, but does not prolong endogenous insulin production.     

An observational study comparing continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and insulin glargine in children with type 1 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: The advantages of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or insulin glargine have been demonstrated both in adult and paediatric diabetic patients; however, as no data comparing these two approaches during childhood are available, we have examined the efficacy of these two intensive approaches. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated data from 36 diabetic children, who had changed their previous insulin regimen [with isophane insulin (NPH) at bedtime] because of HbA1c levels >8.0%. Twenty patients underwent CSII, while the other 16 (significantly younger for age) started insulin glargine at bedtime. RESULTS: At 6 and 12 months, CSII-treated patients showed a significant reduction in HbA1c values from 8.5 +/- 1.8 to 7.4 +/- 1.1% and to 7.6 +/- 1.2%, respectively. The insulin requirement significantly decreased from 0.93 +/- 0.2 IU/kg to 0.73 +/- 0.2 IU/kg of body weight and to 0.74 +/- 0.15 IU/kg of body weight, respectively, while no significant differences were observed for BMI SDS, fructosamine and severe hypoglycaemic events. The patients treated with glargine showed a small decline in HbA1c values from 8.9 +/- 1.7 to 8.3 +/- 0.9% (not significant) in the first 6 months of treatment and to 8.2 +/- 0.9% after 12 months. CONCLUSION: The basal insulin supplementation can be supplied effectively in children with type 1 diabetes by either CSII or insulin glargine. As previously reported for adults, it is confirmed that CSII is the best current intensive approach aimed to the improvement of glycaemic control.     

Treatment with intravenous insulin followed by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion improves glycaemic control in severely resistant Type 2 diabetic patients.

AIMS: Despite high-dose s.c. insulin therapy, some Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients remain in poor metabolic control. We investigated whether a period of euglycaemia using i.v. insulin, followed by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), would ameliorate the deleterious effects of hyperglycaemia on insulin sensitivity and result in sustained, improved metabolic control. METHODS: In a prospective observational study, eight Type 2 DM patients with severe insulin resistance (insulin dose 1.92 +/- 0.66 U/kg per day (mean +/-sd)), in poor metabolic control (HbA(1c) 12.0 +/- 1.7%), were treated with i.v. insulin for 31 +/- 10 days aimed at euglycaemia, followed by CSII therapy for 12 months, using insulin lispro. Before and after 28 +/- 6 days of i.v. insulin treatment, insulin sensitivity was measured by a hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp. RESULTS: Euglycaemia was reached after 12 +/- 6 days of i.v. insulin treatment. Subsequently, the i.v. insulin dose required to maintain euglycaemia decreased from 1.7 +/- 0.9 to 1.1 +/- 0.6 U/kg per day (P < 0.005). Whole body glucose uptake increased from 12.7 +/- 5.7 to 22.4 +/- 8.8 micromol/kg per min (P < 0.0005). HbA(1c) decreased to 8.9 +/- 1.2% after 28 +/- 6 days, to 7.1 +/- 0.6% after 6 months and to 8.3 +/- 1.4% after 12 months (P < 0.001 vs. pretreatment, for all). Lipid profile improved and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 levels decreased significantly. Mean body weight did not change. CONCLUSIONS: In Type 2 diabetic patients, who are poorly controlled despite high-dose s.c. insulin treatment, a period of 2 weeks of euglycaemia achieved by i.v. insulin reverses hyperglycaemia-induced insulin resistance and substantially improves metabolic control. Subsequent CSII treatment, using insulin analogues, appears to maintain improved metabolic control for at least 1 year. This approach is promising but needs further evaluation.     

Improved beta-cell function after intensive insulin treatment in severe non-insulin-dependent diabetes

In Type II, non-insulin-dependent diabetes, insulin secretion is often reduced to the point where oral hypoglycaemic agents fail to control the plasma glucose level. We studied 12 patients (age 41-66 years; 4 lean, 8 obese) with Type II diabetes mellitus for 1-25 years who were uncontrolled despite maximal dose glibenclamide and metformin. After withdrawal of medication, blood glucose control was determined by measuring glucose before and 2 h after each meal for 48 h, and beta-cell function by insulin or C-peptide response to glucagon and to iv glucose. Following these tests, intensive insulin treatment (CSII) was initiated, and near-euglycaemia (mean of 7 daily glucose determinations less than 7.7 mmol/l) was maintained for 16.6 +/- 1.5 days, at which time the tests were repeated. Mean daily insulin requirement was 61 +/- 9 IU (0.81 +/- 0.09 IU/kg). Glucose control was improved after cessation of CSII (mean glucose 12.7 +/- 0.6 mmol/l after vs 20 +/- 1.5 mmol/l before, P less than 0.005). Maximum incremental C-peptide response improved both to glucagon (214 +/- 32 after vs 134 +/- 48 pmol/l before, P = 0.05) and to glucose iv bolus injection (284 +/- 53 vs 113 +/- 32 pmol/l, P less than 0.05). Peak insulin response, measured after iv glucose infusion, also tended to be higher in the post-CSII test (42 +/- 18 vs 22 +/- 5.6 mU/l). Basal and stimulated proinsulin concentrations were high relative to C-peptide levels during the pre-treatment period, but returned to normal after CSII.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A randomized trial of nicotinamide and vitamin E in children with recent onset type 1 diabetes (IMDIAB IX)

OBJECTIVE: Various adjuvant therapies have been introduced along with intensive insulin therapy in patients with recent onset type 1 diabetes. Nicotinamide (NA), administered at diagnosis of the disease, can have beneficial effects on the clinical remission rate, improve metabolic control and preserve or slightly increase beta-cell function, probably by reducing toxicity due to free oxygen radicals. Vitamin E, a known antioxidant, inhibits lipid peroxidation; this can lead to protection of islet beta cells from the combined effects of interleukin 1, tumor necrosis factor and gamma interferon. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether the addition of vitamin E to NA could improve metabolic control and the residual beta-cell function, as measured by C-peptide secretion, in children and adolescents with recent onset type 1 diabetes; patients were followed-up for 2 years after diagnosis. PATIENTS AND STUDY DESIGN: Recent onset type 1 diabetes patients (n=64, mean age 8.8 years) were recruited by participating centres of the IMDIAB group. Thirty-two patients were randomized to NA (25 mg/kg body weight) plus vitamin E (15 mg/kg body weight); 32 patients acted as controls and received NA only at the same dose as above. Intensive insulin therapy was applied to both treatment groups. RESULTS: There were three drop outs during the 2-year follow-up period. Overall, patients assigned to the NA+vitamin E group or the NA group did not significantly differ in terms of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, insulin requirement or baseline C-peptide secretion. Patients diagnosed at an age of less than 9 years showed significantly reduced C-peptide levels compared with those aged over 9 years at diagnosis and at the 2-year follow-up but there were no differences between the NA and NA+vitamin E treated groups. However at 6 months, patients over 9 years of age treated with NA+vitamin E showed significantly higher C-peptide compared with the NA group (P<0.003). In both age groups and in the different treatment groups, C-peptide levels found at diagnosis were preserved 2 years later. CONCLUSIONS: The use of NA alone, or in combination with vitamin E, along with intensive insulin therapy is able to preserve baseline C-peptide secretion for up to 2 years after diagnosis. This finding is of particular interest for pre-pubertal children with type 1 diabetes and has never been reported before.     

Value of combined subcutaneous infusion of insulin and metformin in 10 insulin-dependent obese diabetics

Combined continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and metformin (M) was tested in 10 overweighted insulin requiring diabetic patients (body mass index 27.9 +/- 4.9 kg/m2). They were still poorly controlled (HbA1 9.6 +/- 0.8%) despite large doses of lente insulin (Novo) (51.7 +/- 19.6 IU/24 h) injected once daily. With CSII after two weeks on placebo (P) they were enrolled in a randomized double blind cross-over trial with two successive one month periods of M (2550 mg/day) or P. At the end of the two-weeks period CSII--initial P, the daily regular insulin requirement decreased significantly (40.1 +/- 18.1). During M and P body weight and HbA1 were unchanged (respectively 28.6 +/- 6.0 vs 29.0 +/- 59 kg/m2 and 7.7 +/- 1.1 vs 7.7 +/- 0.8%). With M daily insulin requirements decreased significantly (32.0 +/- 16.8 vs 38.4 +/- 18.2 IU, p less than 0.05). During test-meals, M compared to placebo also reduced peripheral free insulin concentrations (-24.9 +/- 26.0%) while plasma glucose and C peptide remained comparable. In the conditions of this study, combined CSII and M reduced the insulin resistance observed in overweighted insulin requiring diabetic patients.     

Long-term benefits of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in children with Type 1 diabetes: a 4-year follow-up.

AIM: To determine the safety and effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in attaining long-term glycaemic control in paediatric patients with Type 1 diabetes and to compare the results with those previously recorded in the same patients taking multiple daily injections (MDI) (four injections a day). METHODS: Forty-two patients (mean age 12.2 +/- 3.4 years; range 4.5-17 years; 24 males; mean duration of Type 1 diabetes 5.1 +/- 3.0 years) were studied. The following parameters were assessed in the year before starting CSII treatment (during MDI treatment) and during the 4 years of insulin pump treatment: annual mean HbA1c, insulin requirements (U/kg per day), annual mean of body mass index (BMI) z scores, and adverse events (severe hypoglycaemia and diabetic ketoacidosis/patient per year). Two patients discontinued pump therapy (after 1-year and 2-year follow-up, respectively) because of non-compliance with CSII therapy. RESULTS: Compared with the annual mean HbA1c observed prior to CSII therapy (8.9 +/- 1.0%), the mean HbA1c levels were lower during the first (8.2 +/- 0.9%; P = 0.00), second (8.6 +/- 1.0%; P = 0.05), third (8.4 +/- 0.9%; P = 0.01) and fourth (8.2 +/- 1%; P = 0.00) year of CSII therapy. The insulin requirements (U/kg per day) decreased during CSII treatment compared with MDI treatment. Compared with the annual mean of BMI z scores prior to CSII therapy, BMI z scores were significantly lower during the third and fourth years of CSII therapy. Through the first, second, third and fourth years of follow-up the number of episodes of severe hypoglycaemia (20.0, 20.0, 20.0 and 0 episodes/1000 patient-years, respectively) and diabetic ketoacidosis (0.05, 0.00, 0.03 and 0.00 episodes/patient per year, respectively), events were similar to that in the year preceding CSII therapy (20.0 and 0.03, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this population of selected patients in our clinic, CSII appears to be a safe and effective therapeutic alternative to MDI treatment. This therapy may ensure a stable improvement in long-term glycaemic control in paediatric patients, with no increase in diabetic ketoacidosis and severe hypoglycaemic events and, on the other hand, with a trend of reduction in BMI z scores.     

Optimization of basal insulin delivery in Type 1 diabetes: a retrospective study on the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and insulin glargine.

AIMS: To compare the effects on glycaemic control after using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or insulin glargine. METHODS: Data were obtained from 17 diabetes outpatient clinics in Sweden, employing the same diabetes data management system. Type 1 diabetic patients using multiple dose injections were included prior to starting on either CSII (n = 563) or glargine (n = 513). The median duration of therapy was 25 months for CSII and 6 months for glargine. The comparison between the treatment modalities was carried out by multiple regression analysis and logistic regression analysis in an attempt at reducing the influence of confounding factors. RESULTS: The mean HbA1c decrease was 0.59 +/- 1.19% for CSII and 0.20 +/- 1.07% for glargine (P < 0.001, when assessed by logistic regression). An additional 0.1% lower HbA1c would be expected if glargine had been optimized with basal insulin 40-60% of the daily dose. The more pronounced effect of CSII was achieved with a lower daily dosage of insulin. In a multiple regression analysis with a change of HbA1c as the dependent variable, the following variables were significant: choice of treatment (P < 0.001), HbA1c prior to treatment (P < 0.001) and BMI prior to treatment (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Both regimes improved metabolic control, but CSII resulted in significantly higher reduction in HbA1c than after insulin glargine treatment, particularly in those individuals who had higher levels of HbA1c at baseline.     

Improvement of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes after long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

BACKGROUND: The effects of long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on cardiovascular risk factors such as hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, and proinflammatory cytokine levels have not been assessed so far in type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We analysed the levels of HbA(1c), serum lipids, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha), and interleukin 6 (IL-6) at 0, 2, and 30 weeks after CSII in 15 patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 53.3+/-10.1 years; disease duration, 9.4+/-5.3 years) without previous history of major cardiovascular events. RESULTS: At week 30, CSII significantly lowered HbA(1c) by 5.0+/-0.9% compared to baseline (7.9+/-1.9%, p<0.001) and improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc; 1.09+/-0.16 at baseline vs 1.25+/-0.15 mmol/L at week 30; p<0.05) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc)/HDLc ratios (2.8+/-1.4 at baseline vs 2.2+/-0.9 at week 30; p<0.05). CSII also decreased the proportion of patients with dyslipidaemia at week 30. At baseline, TNF-alpha and IL-6 levels were up-regulated (2.65+/-4.04 and 2.82+/-1.81 pg/mL, respectively) compared to the normal control (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively); however, cytokine levels decreased significantly at week 30 (1.44+/-2.25 and 1.99+/-1.05 pg/mL, respectively; p=NS vs control). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term CSII alone decreased cardiovascular risk factors in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, suggesting that the synchronization of sufficient insulin peaks with meal ingestion and continuous pulsatile infusion of basal insulin corrects metabolic derangements.     

Comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple insulin injections using the NovoPen

Twenty-one patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) participated in a 20-week randomized cross-over comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) with intensified conventional treatment (ICT) using the NovoPen. The Medix or the Auto-Syringe pumps were used for CSII and, during ICT with NovoPen, conventional plastic syringes were used for injections of intermediate-acting insulin at bedtime. At entry HbA1c, was 8.7 +/- 0.4% (mean +/- SE) in CSII patients and 8.8 +/- 0.5% in the ICF group. HbA1c declined significantly in both groups (ICT 7.6 +/- 0.2%; CSII 7.6 +/- 0.2%) though there was no significant difference between the responses. Overall mean blood glucose was slightly but significantly lower during CSII than during ICT (CSII: 7.6 +/- 0.2 mmol/l; ICT: 8.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, p less than 0.05). The number of hypoglycaemic episodes did not differ significantly between patients treated with NovoPen and CSII. At the end of the study, a questionnaire revealed that all but one patient preferred ICT with NovoPen to conventional therapy. Given the choice for future treatment, 6 patients chose CSII, 12 patients preferred ICT with NovoPen and 1 was unsure.     

Biphasic insulin aspart compared to biphasic human insulin reduces postprandial hyperlipidemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Premixed insulin analogues reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes in comparison to premixed regular insulin. Insulin also plays an important role in the regulation of postprandial lipid metabolism. It is known that increased levels of postprandial insulin reduce postprandial hyperlipemia but, on the other hand, no information exists with regard to the possible effect of insulin analogues in comparison to human insulin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 12 subjects (3 men; age 59 +/- 5 years; BMI 30.5 +/- 5.9 kg/m2, duration of diabetes 9 +/- 1 years, HbA1c 8.33 +/- 1.1 %) already on therapy with premixed insulin were treated either with biphasic human insulin (BHI30) or with biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) (1.3 IU fast acting insulin/12 g KH) in the setting of a standardized test meal. Serum levels of glucose, insulin, C-peptide and triglycerides as well as retinylpalmitate in plasma and chylomicron remnants were determined before and up to 8 hours after the meal. RESULTS: As was to be expected, therapy with BIAsp30 reduced the maximum increase of postprandial glucose from 7.10 +/- 2.00 mmol/l to 5.27 +/- 1.83 mmo/l (p = 0.007) compared to BHI30 insulin. In the same way, the maximum increase of triglycerides (from 2.33 +/- 1.03 to 1.65 +/- 0.69 mmol/l, p = 0.014) was reduced. The AUC 0 - 8 for triglycerides was not significantly influenced (34.20 +/- 19.86 vs. 31.46 +/- 16.21 mmol x 8 h/l) but the incremental area over baseline (AOB 0 - 8) was significantly reduced from 8.02 +/- 4.35 to 6.12 +/- 3.94 mmol x 8 h/l (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to conventional human premixed insulin the prandial therapy with biphasic insulin aspart results not only in an improvement of glucose tolerance but also in a significant reduction of postprandial hyperlipemia.     

Prognostic factors for successful insulin therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To assess which factors influence or predict the efficacy of insulin therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes, who were poorly controlled despite maximal doses of oral glucose lowering agents. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with type 2 diabetes participated (mean age (+/- SD), 67 +/- 8 years; body mass index, 25.8 +/- 5.0 kg/m2; median time since diagnosis of diabetes, 8 years (range 1-36); 27 males and 48 females). They were transferred to insulin therapy, in which case either insulin alone, or a combination of insulin and glibenclamide was employed. The importance of baseline parameters (glycaemic control, beta-cell function, measures of insulin resistance) was assessed by comparing good and poor responders (defined as achieved HbA1c < 8.0 or > 9.0%) to insulin therapy, and by multiple logistic regression analysis of these baseline parameters and achieved metabolic control. RESULTS: During insulin therapy, HbA1c levels decreased from 10.9 +/- 1.3 to 8.2 +/- 1.1% (p < 0.001), and fasting blood glucose levels decreased from 14.0 +/- 2.3 to 8.2 +/- 2.1 mmol/l (p < 0.001). Thirty patients reached HbA1c levels < 8.0%, 21 of them even < 7.5%. The mean increase in body weight was 4.5 kg. HbA1c after 6 months was 7.0 +/- 0.6% in the good responders, and 9.8 +/- 0.6% in the poor responders (p < 0.001), despite a comparable insulin dose. Baseline metabolic control was similar in both groups. Also, glucagon-stimulated and calculated insulin secretion, as well as parameters of insulin resistance, such as fasting serum insulin levels, free fatty acids, and serum triglycerides, were not different between both groups, and certainly not higher in the poor responders. Also previous metformin use was not different. However, poor responders were more obese than good responders, and had significantly longer known duration of diabetes. Multiple logistic regression confirmed that only duration of diabetes and body mass index were independent predictors of response to insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes improvement of glycaemic control can be achieved at the expense of some weight gain. Measurement of residual insulin secretion prior to institution of insulin treatment does not discriminate between good and poor responders to this model of therapy. Especially in obese patients with longer duration of diabetes more attention is needed in order to achieve optimal glycaemic control. Combination of insulin with newer drugs, like thiazolidinediones, may perhaps achieve this.     

Long-term treatment combining continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with oral hypoglycaemic agents is effective in type 2 diabetes

AIM: To compare over 3 years the efficacy of two treatment regimens combining continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) in type 2 diabetic patients with HbA(1c) levels>8% despite OHA+/-insulin. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients were randomized to two groups. In both groups metformin was continued; CSII (velosulin) was used with minimal manipulation. Group A: the optimization of insulin doses was exerted on boluses to achieve postprandial glycaemia<9.99 mmol/l. Sulfonylurea, administered as a single dose at bedtime, was adjusted to attain fasting glycaemia<6.66 mmol/l. Group B: the optimization of insulin doses was exerted on night time basal rate to attain fasting glycaemia<6.66 mmol/l. Sulfonylurea, given before each meal, was adjusted to obtain postprandial glycaemia<9.99 mmol/l. RESULTS: During the 3 years follow-up, overall mean HbA(1c) values decreased similarly for both groups from baseline (9.45+/-0.83%) to 1, 2, 3 years (7.76+/-0.85%; 8.06+/-1.10%; 8.27+/-1.06% P<0.0001). The mean frequency of minor hypoglycaemia was 1.3+/-2.3 events per month per patient and 14 severe hypoglycaemic events occurred with no difference between the two groups. In both groups we observed a significant and similar weight gain and improvement in quality of life. CONCLUSION: Long-term combination therapy with OHA and CSII with only basic manipulation and optimization of insulin doses exerted on basal rate or on boluses is feasible, effective and well accepted in type 2 diabetes.     

Altered recognition of hypoglycaemic symptoms in type I diabetes during intensified control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

The effect of intensified metabolic control obtained with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) on the frequency and symptoms of hypoglycaemia was studied in type I diabetic patients. The reproducibility of the questionnaire used to evaluate the hypoglycaemic symptoms was verified in a control group receiving unchanged conventional insulin therapy for 2 months. Metabolic control was significantly improved during CSII (HbA1c 6.8 +/- 0.4% versus 8.7 +/- 0.7%, normal range up to 5.4%) in all patients while no change was seen in the control group. The results of frequent self glucose monitoring showed that the incidence of low glucose levels (below 3.5 mmol/l) increased about threefold in the CSII group. Awareness of hypoglycaemia was clearly changed during CSII with less pronounced adrenergic symptoms while no alterations were found in the group with unchanged metabolic control. These results emphasize the importance of regular self glucose monitoring during CSII and of informing the patients that their hypoglycaemic symptoms may change during intensified control.     

Quality of life and metabolic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 treated by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily insulin injections

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of life and metabolic control in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in comparison with patients on multiple daily insulin injections (MDII). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included 49 patients (13 males, 36 females), aged 41.4+/-11.3 years (mean+/-SD) on CSII for >1 year and 79 patients (43 males, 36 females), aged 43.1+/-14.8 years on MDII for >1 year, from three Dutch diabetic clinics. There were no statistically significant differences in duration of diabetes, social class, level of education, marital status, smoking or recent admissions to hospital. The questionnaires used were a Diabetes Quality of Life scale adapted from the DCCT, the Diabetes Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ), and the WHO Well-Being Questionnaire. HbA1c was measured with an HPLC method (reference range 4.3 to 6.1 %). RESULTS: Using two-sided t-tests no statiscally significant differences were found between the patients on CSII and MDII with respect to quality of life (version A (<30 years) 4.32+/-0.22 vs 4.20+/-0.30; version B (> or =30 years) 4.18+/-0.25 vs 4.29+/-0.28), well-being (48.59+/-9.23 vs 50.99 +/-8.70), satisfaction with treatment (5.10+/-0.69 vs 5.15+/-0.71) and HbA1c (8.14+/-1.51 vs 8.47+/-1.40). Frequency of daily blood glucose monitoring was slightly higher in CSII than in MDII patients (4.52+/-1.19 vs 3.60+/-1.47; p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The present data indicate that patients on CSII have similar QoL based on questionnaires when compared with patients on MDII. These data suggest that in patients with less optimal control on MDII, converting the treatment strategy to CSII is not associated with decreased quality of life.     

Age-related differences in metabolic response to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in pre-pubertal and pubertal children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus

The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical and metabolic data in a cohort of Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) children before and after 2 yr of continuous s.c. insulin infusion (CSII). Forty seven T1DM patients were subdivided into two groups: Group A (20 pre-pubertal children, mean age 7.43+/-3.19 yr); Group B (27 pubertal adolescents, mean age 14.47+/-1.91 yr). No statistically significant differences in body mass index (BMI) occurred in either groups after starting CSII or during follow-up. The frequency of mild-hypoglycemias significantly declined during pump therapy only in Group A (p<0.05). Both pre-pubertal and pubertal patients required a significant reduction in their total insulin requirement after 12 and 24 months of CSII. The total percentage of daily insulin doses delivered as basal rates was similar in both groups and was negatively associated (beta=-2.956, p=0.05) with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values. No significant correlation was found between the percentage of the basal insulin rate and the number of daily boluses. Differences in timing of the highest insulin requirement were observed between the two groups. Group A had a higher insulin basal rate late in the evening (20:00-24:00 h), while Group B had a higher insulin requirement early in the morning (03:00-07:00 h). The HbA1c levels significantly improved in Group A after 6-12 and 24 months of CSII. In Group B a reduction of HbA1c values was observed only after 6 months of pump therapy (p=0.05). CSII is an effective therapy for all ages but different metabolic requirements should also be taken into account.     

Improved metabolic control in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with insulin and tolazamide

The influence of sulfonylurea drugs in enhancing the effect of endogenous insulin is well documented. Furthermore, combination therapy with sulfonylurea and insulin is effective in the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus. Therefore, to assess the efficacy of this type of combination therapy in type I diabetes, we conducted a double-blind clinical trial with tolazamide and insulin in 15 subjects with type I diabetes. The diagnosis of type I diabetes was confirmed by previous episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis and undetectable C-peptide levels in serum samples from blood drawn from patients two hours after breakfast. During the study protocol, placebo or tolazamide was randomly added to insulin and the combination therapy was continued for three months. In the placebo group, levels of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) did not alter significantly at the end of the study period. However, in the tolazamide group, levels of FPG and HbA1c markedly improved after administration of tolazamide (FPG levels before therapy, 10.8 +/- 0.9 mmol/L [mean +/- SEM]; after therapy, 6.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/L; HbA1c levels before therapy, 10.9% +/- 0.6%; after therapy, 9.6% +/- 0.5%). Therefore, adjuvant therapy with tolazamide and insulin may be beneficial in achieving adequate metabolic control in type I diabetes mellitus.     

In search of predictive markers of remission from insulin dependence in type 1 diabetes: a preliminary report.

We studied 18 newly diagnosed diabetic patients (8 males and 10 females, aged 18-26 years, within 10-120 days from the onset of symptoms) who were submitted for 15 days to intensive insulin therapy performed via subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). We investigated some metabolic and immunological parameters in order to identify a possible marker to predict the selection of patients potentially more responsive to CSII treatment for the remission of type 1 diabetes. In accordance with the International Diabetes Immunology Group we considered clinical remission as being the withdrawal of insulin therapy for at least 3 months. In order to assess beta-cell function a fasting and post-prandial serum C-peptide, blood glucose and HbA1c were performed on all patients before, and 3 days after, the discontinuation of CSII. Islet cell antibodies were determined in all sera by indirect immunofluorescence. Analysis of T-lymphocyte subpopulations was carried out before starting the therapy. The following monoclonal antibodies were used: CD4, CD8, CD57, CD25, HLA-DR. The levels of C3 and C4 and serum IgG, IgA and IgM were also evaluated. After CSII, 11 of 18 patients showed remission. At the beginning of the study we observed no major difference in metabolic parameters between the two groups. Interestingly, the patients who exhibited remission presented a statistically higher percentage of positive cells for CD57, HLA-DR and CD25 surface antigens, significantly lower C4 levels and CD4/CD8 ratio and significantly higher IgG levels compared with patients who did not show any remission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Predictors of glycemic control on insulin pump therapy in children and adolescents with type I diabetes

OBJECTIVE: To determine variables predictive of glycemic control in a large population of pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). METHODS: Charts of patients on CSII for > or =1 year were reviewed. "Good" control was a priori defined as HbA1c < or =9% in patients under 12 years of age, and < or =8% in patients over 12 years. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were identified (57 girls and 36 boys). Their mean age at pump start was 11.6+/-3.1 years with duration of diabetes of 4.7+/-3.1 years. Average time on pump therapy was 2.4+/-0.8 years. HbA1C decreased from 8.7+/-0.9% prior to pump therapy to 8.3+/-0.6% while on CSII (p < 0.01). Despite analysis of a large number of possible predictors, only number of basal rates (4.4 versus 3.4) and younger age (10.0 years versus 13.1 years) correlated with good control. CONCLUSION: Only younger age and use of more basal rates were predictive of good diabetes control in children using CSII. Decisions regarding which pediatric patients are most appropriate for CSII must continue to be individualized.     

The addition of glipizide to insulin therapy in type-II diabetic patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas is useful only in the presence of a significant residual insulin secretion

The present study aimed at 1) investigating the effect of a combined insulin + glipizide treatment on the metabolic control (HbA1c levels) and insulin requirements (Biostator assessment) in ten non-obese Type-II diabetic patients with recent secondary failure to sulfonylureas; and 2) characterizing the relative contributions of changes in endogenous insulin secretion (C-peptide response) and insulin sensitivity (insulin-induced glucose disposal in clamped conditions) to this effect. The patients were treated in a randomized cross-over order with either insulin alone or insulin + glipizide (3 X 10 mg/day) during two periods averaging 6 weeks each. Mean HbA1c levels were similar in both experimental conditions (8.2 +/- 0.6 vs 7.9 +/- 0.6%, NS). In fact, during the combined therapy, HbA1c levels decreased in five subjects (from 8.6 +/- 0.7 to 7.1 +/- 0.5%; 'responder'), but not in the five others ('non-responders'); the 20-h Biostator insulin infusion was significantly decreased in the responders (29%; P less than 0.05), but not in the non-responders. Basal (0.271 +/- 0.086 vs 0.086 +/- 0.017 nmol/l; P less than 0.05) and post-glucagon (0.468 +/- 0.121 vs 0.180 +/- 0.060 nmol/l; P less than 0.05) C-peptide plasma levels were significantly higher in the responders than in the non-responders; in addition, glipizide significantly increased basal C-peptide concentrations in the responders only (+68%; P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)