Induction and concurrent paclitaxel/carboplatin every 3 weeks with thoracic radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an interim report

The paclitaxel/carboplatin combination has demonstrated promising activity in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); therefore, we mounted an exploratory study of these agents with thoracic radiation (TRT) in locally advanced NSCLC. Eligibility stipulated a Karnofsky performance status >or= 70%, weight loss or= 2 esophagitis has corresponded to length (> 16 cm) of esophagus in the radiation treatment field (Fisher's exact test, P = 0.006). The partial response rate to induction therapy was 40% and to the combined modality therapy was 60%. The median survival for all 49 patients is 15.3 months, with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 7.8 months. In the subset of 22 patients treated on the phase I portion of the study, the median survival and DFS were 18.5 months and 13.5 months, respectively. Induction therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with the same agents is an active and well-tolerated treatment approach in locally advanced NSCLC. To date, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 plus carboplatin AUC 5 administered at 3-week intervals for 2 cycles is safe in combination with TRT.     

A phase II study of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy for locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (a Vanderbilt Cancer Center Affiliate Network Study)

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective phase II study to determine the response rate, toxicity, and survival rate of concurrent weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT) followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin for locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin regimen was designed to optimize the radiosensitizing properties of paclitaxel during the concurrent phase of treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-three patients with unresectable stage IIIA and IIIB NSCLC from the Vanderbilt Cancer Center and Affiliate Network (VCCAN) institutions were entered onto the study from June 1996 until May 1997. Weekly intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2)/l-hour) and weekly carboplatin (AUC 2) plus concurrent hyperfractionated chest RT (1.2 Gy/BID/69.6 Gy) were delivered for 6 weeks followed by 2 cycles of paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC 6). RESULTS: Forty-two patients were evaluable for response and toxicities. Three patients achieved a complete response (7.2%) and 30 patients achieved a partial response (71.4%), for an overall response rate of 78.6% [95% C.I. (66.2%-91.0%)]. The 1- and 2-year overall and progression-free survival rates of all 43 patients were 61.6% and 35% respectively, with a median survival time of 14.3 months. The median follow-up time was 14 months. Esophagitis was the principal toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis occurred in 11 patients (26%). There was an incidence of 7% grade 3 and 9.5% grade 4 pulmonary toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin, plus concurrent hyperfractionated RT is a well-tolerated outpatient regimen. The response rate from this regimen is encouraging and appears to be at least equivalent to the more toxic chemoradiation trials. These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin/HFX RT in a phase III study.     

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and concurrent radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

We conducted a phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with inoperable NSCLC were enrolled onto a multicenter phase II trial of concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Patients received six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 45 mg/m(2) over 1 h; carboplatin at (area under the curve) AUC 2; and radiation therapy of 60 Gy. Radiation was administered to the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes (40 Gy over 4 weeks) followed by a boost to the primary tumor (20 Gy in 2 weeks). After the initial phase of concurrent chemoradiation, patients received an additional four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h and carboplatin at AUC 6 every 3 weeks. The overall objective response rate of 30 assessable patients was 76.7%. At the median follow-up time of 13.1 months, the median survival time was 14.5 months (95% CI, 10.59-18.48). The median progression-free survival was 10.5 months (95% CI, 7.72-13.28). The major toxicity was hematologic. The incidence of grade 3 esophagitis was 10%. In conclusion, this chemoradiation regimen is well tolerated and shows significant clinical results for locally advanced NSCLC. Locoregional failure rate remains an important issue with this newer chemotherapeutic regimen. A novel chemotherapy and radiation therapy is clearly needed.     

Induction carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and dose-escalating conformal thoracic radiation therapy in unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a modified Phase I trial

BACKGROUND: A modified Phase I trial was conducted evaluating the incorporation of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) into a strategy of sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in Stage III, unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). In addition, dose escalation of thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) from 60 to 74 gray (Gy) was performed. Endpoints included response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC were included. Patients received 2 cycles of induction carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2)/3 hours) every 21 days. On Day 43, concurrent TCRT and weekly (x6) carboplatin (AUC 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/3 hours) was initiated. The TCRT dose was escalated from 60 to 74 Gy in 4 cohorts. RESULTS: The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 52%. Three patients (10%) experienced disease progression during the induction phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was seen during the escalation of the TCRT dose from 60 to 74 Gy. The major toxicity was esophagitis, with 18% of patients developing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 esophagitis. The overall response rate was 70% (1 complete response and 18 partial responses). Survival rates at 1 and 2 years were 69% and 45%, with a median survival of 21 months. The 1-year progression free survival probability was 41% (95% confidence interval, 23-59%). CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of 3DCRT with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible, and dose escalation of TCRT to 74 Gy is possible with acceptable toxicity. Overall response and survival rates are encouraging. Accrual is continuing in a Phase II fashion at 74 Gy with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel.     

A randomized phase II trial comparing every 3-weeks carboplatin/paclitaxel with every 3-weeks carboplatin and weekly paclitaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The optimal schedule of taxane administration has been an area of active interest in several recent clinical trials. METHODS: To address a pure schedule question, we randomized 161 patients with advanced stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to either paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 every 3 weeks x 4 cycles or 75 mg/m2/week x 12 (cumulative dose on each arm = 900 mg/m2). Both arms received concurrent carboplatin AUC 6 every 3 weeks x 4 cycles. RESULTS: The two arms were well-balanced in terms of known prognostic factors. The overall response rate and survival outcomes were similar on the two arms. There was significantly more grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and grade 2-4 anemia on the weekly arm but less severe myalgias/arthralgias and alopecia. No difference in the rates of peripheral neuropathy was observed; however, patients on the every 3 weeks arm reported significantly more taxane therapy-related side-effects on the functional assessment of cancer therapy taxane subscale. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial exploring schedule-related issues with carboplatin/paclitaxel confirms the versatility of this regimen.     

Pilot study of organ preservation multimodality therapy for locally advanced resectable oropharyngeal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to determine the early efficacy and toxicity of a new multimodality organ-preservation regimen for locally advanced, resectable oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patients with T3-4N0-3M0 or T2N2-3M0 oropharyngeal SCC were eligible for this Phase II study. Patients needed the physiologic reserve for surgery and technically resectable tumors. Induction carboplatin (area under the curve = 6) and paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) x 2 cycles (q21 days) were given. Objective responders received definitive radiotherapy (XRT), 70 Gy/7 weeks with concurrent weekly paclitaxel. Initially, the dose of paclitaxel was 50 mg/m2/week; because of mucosal toxicity it was reduced to 30 mg/m2/week. Patients with N2-3 disease received post-XRT neck dissection and 2 more cycles of "adjuvant" chemotherapy. In the first 22 patients, the neutropenic fever rate was 27%. Although there has been no grade IV-V toxicity from induction therapy, grade II-III toxicity resulted in an unacceptable delay in starting XRT in 14% of patients. The response rate to induction chemotherapy was 91%. Grade III mucositis occurred in all patients during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. One patient died of pneumonia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy after receiving 26 Gy and 3 doses of paclitaxel 50 mg/m2. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred in 15 patients treated with concurrent paclitaxel 30 mg/m2/week. Actuarial overall survival at 18 months is 82%; local-regional control is 86%. To date, distant metastases have not developed in any patients. This regimen has intense but acceptable acute toxicity. The maximum tolerated dosage of weekly paclitaxel during standard continuous-course XRT is confirmed to be 30 mg/m2/week. The treatment efficacy of this regimen (response rate and short-term local-regional and distant control) is encouraging. Accrual continues to obtain long-term toxicity, efficacy, and quality-of-life data.     

Multicenter, randomized trial for stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer using weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin followed by maintenance weekly paclitaxel or observation.

PURPOSE: To explore the efficacy and safety of three regimens of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin as initial therapy and the feasibility of subsequent maintenance therapy versus observation in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred one patients were randomly assigned to one of the following arms: arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] = 6) on day 1; arm 2, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks; or arm 3, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 cycle 1 and 100 mg/m2 cycle 2 and carboplatin (AUC = 2) weekly for 6 of 8 weeks. Patients who responded (n = 130) at week 16 were randomly assigned to either weekly paclitaxel therapy (70 mg/m2, 3 of 4 weeks; n = 65) or observation (n = 65). RESULTS: For the 390 assessable patients, the objective response rates observed with initial therapy were 32% for arm 1, 24% for arm 2, and 18% for arm 3. The median time to progression and median survival times were 30 and 49 weeks for arm 1, 21 and 31 weeks for arm 2, and 27 and 40 weeks for arm 3, respectively. The 1-year survival rates were 47% for arm 1, 31% for arm 2, and 41% for arm 3. CONCLUSION: Arm 1, paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks with carboplatin (AUC = 6) administered on day 1, demonstrates the most favorable therapeutic index in patients with advanced NSCLC.     

Randomized double-blind trial of combined modality treatment with or without amifostine in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: Greater toxicities have been recognized to be a consequence of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was designed to determine if the use of amifostine could reduce treatment-related toxicities associated with the use of paclitaxel plus carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC were treated with two cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and carboplatin (area under the time-concentration curve = 6), followed by thoracic radiotherapy (64 Gy) with concurrent weekly paclitaxel 60 mg/m2. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 740 mg/m2 of amifostine (arm A) or placebo (arm B) before each dose of paclitaxel and carboplatin. Treatment-related toxicities were evaluated at each visit and nerve conduction tests were performed before and after treatment for the objective assessment of neurotoxicity. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between arms A and B in grade 3 to 4 neutropenia. In all 72 neurophysiological parameters measured, there was no significant difference between the two treatment arms, although there was a trend toward fewer patients showing deterioration in arm A for six of the parameters. Grade 2 to 3 esophagitis occurred in 43% of patients in arm A and in 70% of patients in arm B. The difference of -27% (95% confidence limit = -50%, 0.4%) was not statistically significant. Response rates and survival were also not significantly different between the two arms. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with amifostine showed a trend toward reducing the severity of esophagitis associated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but it did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant protective effect on hematologic or neurologic toxicities induced by paclitaxel and carboplatin.     

Randomized trial of amifostine in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and hyperfractionated radiation: radiation therapy oncology group trial 98-01.

PURPOSE: To test the ability of the cytoprotectant, amifostine, to reduce chemoradiotherapy-induced esophagitis and evaluate its influence on quality of life (QOL) and swallowing symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 243 patients with stage II to IIIA/B non-small-cell lung cancer received induction paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) days 1 and 22 and carboplatin area under the curve (AUC) days 1 and 22, followed by concurrent weekly paclitaxel (50 mg/m(2) IV) and carboplatin (AUC 2), and hyperfractionated radiation therapy (69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy bid). Patients were randomly assigned at registration to amifostine (AM) 500 mg IV four times per week or no AM during chemoradiotherapy. Beyond standard toxicity end points, physician dysphagia logs (PDLs), daily patient swallowing diaries, and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30/LC-13) were also collected. Swallowing AUC analyses were calculated from patient diaries and PDLs. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to receive AM, and 122, to receive no AM (one patient was ineligible); 72% received AM per protocol or with a minor deviation. AM was associated with higher rates of acute nausea (P = .03), vomiting (P = .007), cardiovascular toxicity (P = .0001), and infection or febrile neutropenia (P = .03). The rate of >/= grade 3 esophagitis was 30% with AM versus 34% without AM (P = .9). Patient diaries demonstrated lower swallowing dysfunction AUC with amifostine (z test P = .025). QOL was not significantly different between the two arms, except for pain, which showed more clinically meaningful improvement and less deterioration at 6 weeks follow-up (v pretreatment) in the AM arm (P = .003). The median survival rates for both arms were comparable (AM, 17.3 v no AM, 17.9 months; P = .87). CONCLUSION: AM did not significantly reduce esophagitis >/= grade 3 in patients receiving hyperfractionated radiation and chemotherapy. However, patient self-assessments suggested a possible advantage to AM that is being explored with modified dosing route strategies.     

A randomized phase III trial of combined paclitaxel, carboplatin, and radiation therapy followed by weekly paclitaxel or observation for patients with locally advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundThis study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of additional maintenance chemotherapy after standard induction chemotherapy/radiation therapy (XRT) in stage III non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary objective was to increase 1-year survival.Patients and MethodsEligible patients (N = 220) had confirmed stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1. Patients received induction chemotherapy (paclitaxel 200 mg/m² + carboplatin AUC = 6/3 weeks) for 2 cycles, followed by paclitaxel 45 mg/m² + carboplatin AUC = 2 weekly ×7 and concurrent daily XRT (cumulative dose = 66.6 Gy in 37 fractions) and then observation or maintenance. Before randomization, 101 patients (46%) discontinued treatment due to progressive disease (n = 34), toxicity (n = 33), patient request (n = 13), death (n = 7), or other (n = 14). The remaining 119 patients were randomly assigned to either “observation” or “maintenance” (6 cycles of paclitaxel 70 mg/m²/wk [3 weeks on/1 week off]); a median of 5 of 6 planned cycles was delivered in the maintenance arm.ResultsFor the observation group vs. the maintenance group, the estimated 1- and 4-year survival rates were 77% vs. 66% and 38% vs. 17% (median, 26.9 months vs. 16.1 months, respectively [P = .07]); the estimated 1- and 4-year performance-free survival (PFS) were 46% vs. 24% and 25% vs. 13% (median, 10.2 months vs. 8.2 months, respectively [P = .04]). Common toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue.ConclusionMedian survival in both groups surpassed the standard, most notably the 26.9-month survival in the observation group. Maintenance chemotherapy, when added to a regimen of both induction and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, did not improve clinical outcomes, with endpoints favoring the standard arm.     

Dose-escalating conformal thoracic radiation therapy with induction and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in unresectable stage IIIA/B nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a modified phase I/II trial

BACKGROUND: A modified Phase I/II trial was conducted evaluating the incorporation of three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy into a strategy of sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel in Stage III unresectable nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The dose of thoracic conformal radiation therapy (TCRT) from 60 to 74 gray (Gy) was increased. Endpoints included response rate, toxicity, and survival. METHODS: Sixty-two patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC were included. Patients received 2 cycles of induction carboplatin (area under the concentration curve [AUC], 6) and paclitaxel (225 mg/m(2) over 3 hours) every 21 days. On Day 43, concurrent TCRT and weekly (x 6) carboplatin (AUC, 2) and paclitaxel (45 mg/m(2)/3 hours) were initiated. The TCRT dose was escalated from 60 to 74 Gy in 4 cohorts (60, 66, 70, and 74 Gy). RESULTS: The response rate to induction carboplatin/paclitaxel was 40%. Eight patients (13%) progressed on the induction phase. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed during the escalation of the TCRT dose from 60 to 74 Gy. The major toxicity was esophagitis, however, only 8% developed Grade 3/4 esophagitis using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The overall response rate was 52%. Survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 71%, 52%, 40%, and 36%, respectively, with a median survival of 26 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year progression free survival probabilities were 47%, 35%, and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporation of TCRT with sequential and concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel is feasible, and dose escalation of TCRT to 74 Gy is possible with acceptable toxicity. Overall response and survival rates are encouraging. Both locoregional and distant failure remain problematic in this population of patients.     

Induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy in stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of induction chemotherapy with paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by concurrent radiotherapy with weekly paclitaxel in stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB NSCLC received two 3-week cycles of paclitaxel 200mg/m(2) combined with carboplatin (target area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) of 6 mg/ml) followed by weekly paclitaxel 50mg/m(2) concurrently with radiotherapy consisted of 2 Gy daily, 5 days per week (60 Gy total dose in 6 weeks). The median follow-up period was 5 years. RESULTS: Between March 1999 and January 2002, 21 patients were enrolled and analyzed. Ninety percent of patients completed the planned treatment schedule. The overall response rate was 76% (24% complete response and 52% partial response). The median overall survival time was 15 months and the 1-year, 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 57, 33 and 24%, respectively. The disease progression rate at 1 year was 43% and the median progression-free survival was 8 months. During the chemoradiation period, grade 3-4 oesophagitis and pneumonitis were observed in 24 and 14% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel with concurrent radiotherapy was found to be active and tolerable in selected stage IIIB NSCLC patients. Further studies are needed to improve the safety profile and outcome in this setting.     

Induction chemotherapy with carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by surgery or standard radiotherapy and concurrent daily low-dose cisplatin for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Five-year survival in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is less than 10%. In the present phase II study, 43 patients with locally advanced stage IIIA or selected IIIB NSCLC were given four courses of carboplatin AUC = 6 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion), every 3 weeks. Responsive patients, when possible, underwent surgery followed by standard radiotherapy (50 Gy) or radiotherapy (60 Gy), with concurrent cisplatin as intravenous continuous infusion of 4 mg/m2/d. Sixteen of the 42 evaluable patients achieved partial response (38%) and 3 complete response (CR) (7%) for an overall response rate of 45% (95% CI 30.1-60.2). R0 resectability rate was 29%, with 21% of pathologic CRs. Three more CRs were achieved with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in responsive but unresected patients. Grade III/IV hematologic toxicity was 9%, while one perioperative death occurred. The median duration of response was 14 months (range: 3-44+); median survival was 15 months (range: 9-47+). One-year and 2-year survival rates were 51% and 22%, respectively. The median survival in the responsive resected patients was 26 months, with 2-year survival of 57%. Carboplatin/paclitaxel represents an effective and well-tolerated induction therapy, suggesting its possible role in combination with radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced NSCLC in alternative to cisplatin-based regimens.     

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel for locally advanced head and neck cancer: toxicities and efficacy

Background.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and alternative chemotherapy regimens strive to maintain efficacy while minimizing toxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) treatment. Our experience with concurrent IMRT and taxane-based chemotherapy is presented.

Methods.

A retrospective review of 150 consecutive patients with LAHNC treated with IMRT and concurrent taxane-based chemotherapy with curative intent was performed. The IMRT fractionation regimen consisted of 69.3 Gy to gross disease (2.1 Gy/fraction) and 56.1 Gy to prophylactic nodal sites (1.7 Gy/fraction). Weekly paclitaxel (30 mg/m²) and carboplatin (area under the concentration–time curve [AUC], 1) were given concurrently to all patients, and 69% received weekly induction with paclitaxel (60 mg/m²) and carboplatin (AUC, 2).

Results.

Over 90% of patients received the prescribed radiation dose. Ninety-six percent completed five or more cycles of concurrent chemotherapy, with similar tolerability for induction chemotherapy. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube was required in 80 patients, with 10 maintaining PEG use >18 months. Acute grade 4 mucositis and dermatitis developed in 2.0% and 4.0% of patients, respectively. No patient experienced nadir sepsis, grade ≥3 late xerostomia, or significant nephropathy or gastrointestinal toxicity. Median follow-up was 30 months. The 3-year locoregional control rate was 83.2% with disease-free survival and overall survival rates of 78.8% and 76.5%, respectively.

Conclusion.

Rates of acute and late toxicities were low, with excellent radiation dose delivery and impressive tumor control at 3 years, suggesting that concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with IMRT is a reasonable therapeutic option for the curative treatment of LAHNC.     

Twice-weekly paclitaxel and weekly carboplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel consolidation for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a California Cancer Consortium phase II trial.

PURPOSE: Recent studies have suggested the superiority of concurrent chemoradiotherapy and the efficacy of paclitaxel/carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In view of those results, we sought to examine the safety and efficacy of administration of radiosensitizing paclitaxel twice weekly and carboplatin weekly with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy (XRT) followed by consolidation paclitaxel and carboplatin for stage III NSCLC in a multi-institutional phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Induction chemoradiotherapy consisted of paclitaxel 30 mg/m2 delivered intravenously (IV) for 1 hour twice weekly for 6 weeks, carboplatin at a dose based on an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 1.5 mg/mL x min, given IV once weekly for 6 weeks, and concomitant XRT of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy daily for a total of 61 Gy. Patients who achieved a complete response, partial response, or stable disease received two 21-day cycles of consolidation chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 IV for 3 hours and carboplatin at a dose based on an AUC of 6 mg/mL x min. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were eligible. Their median age was 62 years (range, 39 to 73 years), 59% were female, 41% were male, 94% had a performance status of 0 or 1, 38% had stage IIIA NSCLC, and 62% had stage IIIB NSCLC. Common grade III and IV toxicities during the induction chemoradiation phase included esophagitis (38%) and neutropenia (12%). The most common adverse reaction during consolidation chemotherapy was grade III neutropenia in five patients (15%). The overall response rate was 71%, which was achieved in the induction phase. The median follow-up was 20 months, the median survival was 17 months, and 2-year actuarial survival rate was 40% (95% confidence interval, 20% to 65%). CONCLUSION: This regimen is tolerable and results are promising. We recommend further evaluation of this regimen in a phase III trial.     

紫杉醇卡铂周方案同步化疗联合三维适形放射治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

目的观察紫杉醇卡铂周方案同步化疗联合三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)治疗局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的毒性反应及疗效。方法采用前瞻性非随机对照方法,将52例局部晚期NSCLC患者分为同步组(21例):采用紫杉醇和卡铂周方案化疗联合同步3D-CRT;序贯组(31例):采用紫杉醇和卡铂序贯化疗联合3D-CRT。同步组紫杉醇40 mg/m2,静脉滴注1h;卡铂AUC 1.5。序贯组在放疗前行2周期的紫杉醇和卡铂辅助化疗,紫杉醇150 mg/m2,第1天、第21天;卡铂AUC 5,第1天、第21天。3D-CRT 1.8～2.0 Gy/d,总剂量60～66 Gy/6～8周。结果52例患者全部完成治疗。有12例患者在治疗过程中由于白细胞减少而导致治疗时间延长1周以上,其中同步组5例,序贯组7例。同步组中,肺原发灶完全缓解(CR)为9.5%(2/21),部分缓解(PR)为71.4%(15/21),无变化和进展(NC PD)为19.0%(4/21),有效率(CR PR)为81.0%。序贯组中,肺原发灶CR为6.5%(2/31),PR为67.7%(21/31),NC PD为25.8%(8/31),CR PR为74.2%。同步组和序贯组患者的Ⅱ～Ⅲ级急性放射性食管炎、Ⅱ～Ⅲ级急性放射性肺炎和Ⅱ～Ⅲ级白细胞减少发生率分别为61.9%(13/21)和41.9%(13/31)、23.8%(5/21)和22.6%(7/31)及42.9%(9/21)和19.4%(6/31)。同步组有1例患者出现Ⅳ级白细胞减少。52例患者的中位生存时间为17.5个月(同步组19.0个月,序贯组15.8个月),1、2年总生存率分别为72.0%和37.0%,1、2年局部控制率分别为75.0%和75.0%。结论同步放化疗是一种安全有效的治疗方法,绝大多数患者能耐受治疗。同步组与序贯组相比,有提高有效率和延长生存率的趋势,但差异并无统计学意义。     

紫杉醇加顺铂同步放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌的临床研究

目的:探讨紫杉醇加顺铂(TP)同步放化疗治疗局部晚期食管癌的疗效及毒副反应。方法:48例局部晚期食管癌患者,随机分成两组,每组24例,A组为单纯放疗组,B组为每周紫杉醇加顺铂同步放化疗组。两组均采用6MV或者18MVX射线放射治疗,食管癌原发灶剂量60～68Gy,区域淋巴结剂量50～60Gy。B组放疗同时给予紫杉醇40mg/m2 DDP20mg/m2,均于d1、d8、d15、d22、d29、d36静滴。结果:单纯放疗组和紫杉醇加顺铂组的有效率(CR PR)分别为75%和88%,差异有显著性意义(P<0.05)。两组的1、3、5年局部无进展生存率分别为60.7%、21.0%和9.5%,71.2%、49.3%和19.2%,两组局部无进展生存率差异有显著性意义(P=0.034);两组的1、3、5年生存率分别为66.7%、25.0%和12.5%,79.2%、58.3%和29.2%,总生存率差异有显著性意义(P=0.041)。同步放化疗组的Ⅲ、Ⅳ级毒副反应高于单纯放疗组。结论:同步放化疗可提高局部晚期食管癌的无进展生存率和总生存率,但毒副反应有增加的趋势。     

三维适形放疗联合诱导化疗和紫杉醇同期化疗不能手术Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌的疗效分析

目的 观察诱导化疗和三维适形放疗(3DCRT)联合每周紫杉醇治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效及毒性.方法 56例不能手术的Ⅲ期NSCLC患者予紫杉醇(175 mg/m2第1天)加卡铂(AUC=5～6第1天)诱导化疗2～4个疗程,化疗后3～4周内开始3DCRT,剂量在满足V20≤31%,脊髓≤50 Gy的条件下给予尽可能高(平均60.75 Gy),联合每周紫杉醇40 mg/m2同期化疗.结果 同期放化疗期间,3例因3+4级放射性肺炎,1例因3级心脏毒性终止治疗,2例因身体虚弱分别中断治疗7、12 d,其余均按计划完成治疗.白细胞下降发生率为58.9%(1例为3级,余为1、2级),3级淋巴细胞下降发生率达75.O%.主要急性毒性为放射性食管炎和放射性肺炎,≥2级发生率分别为38%和25%.放射性食管炎3级3例,放射性肺炎3级2例,4级1例.2、3、4级晚期食管损伤各1例,肺纤维化2级9例.肺原发灶总有效率为69.7%.1年生存率分别为72.3%,1年局部无进展生存率为62.7%.局部复发率为32.1%,远处转移率为39.3%,远处转移与局部复发仍是死亡的主要原因.结论 诱导化疗后3DCRT结合每周紫杉醇治疗局部晚期NSCLC耐受性较好,近期疗效好,远期疗效有待继续观察.     

Randomized phase III trial comparing cisplatin-etoposide to carboplatin-paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the regimen of carboplatin plus paclitaxel (investigational arm) versus the reference regimen of cisplatin plus etoposide for the treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 369 patients were enrolled, 179 on arm A (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and etoposide 100 mg/m2) and 190 on arm B (carboplatin AUC=6 mg/ml min and paclitaxel 225 mg/m2), with cycles repeated every 3 weeks. The arms were well balanced with respect to age, performance status, weight loss, stage of disease and disease measurability. However, significantly more women were randomized to arm A than to arm B (P=0.039). RESULTS: The objective response rate (ORR) was 15% on arm A compared with 23% on arm B (P=0.061). Median survival time, time to progression and 1-year survival rates for arms A and B were 274 days and 233 days (P=0.086), 111 days and 121 days (P=0.877), and 37% and 32%, respectively. The most prevalent toxicities were neutropenia and leukopenia and they occurred at a higher rate in arm A than in arm B. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant survival advantage for carboplatin-paclitaxel compared with cisplatin-etoposide. However, there was an overall benefit in quality of life with the carboplatin-paclitaxel regimen.     

Gemcitabine,paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. The initial dose level was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks. Concurrent radiation to 50.4 Gy was delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. The radiation fields included the primary tumor, plus the regional peripancreatic, celiac, and porta hepatis lymph nodes. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and anorexia occurred in 3 of 3 patients at the second dose level of gemcitabine, 150 mg/m(2)/week. An intermediate dose level of gemcitabine, 110 mg/m(2)/week, was added, but gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary pneumonitis were encountered. The MTD therefore was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and concurrent radiation. Two of 11 patients treated at the MTD had Grade 3/4 toxicity. Four of 10 assessable patients treated at the MTD responded (40%), including one pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dosage of gemcitabine is 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and conventional 50.4 Gy radiation fields. A Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study is under way.