Patient-controlled drug administration during local anesthesia: A comparison of midazolam, propofol, and alfentanil

Study Objective: To evaluate the perioperative effects of alfentanil, midazolam, and propofol when administered using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device during local anesthesia.

Design: Randomized, single-blind comparative study.

Setting: Outpatient surgery center at a university teaching hospital.

Patients: Ninety outpatients undergoing minor elective surgical procedures with local anesthetic infiltration were assigned to one of three treatment groups.

Interventions: After premedication with midazolam 1 mg intravenously (IV) and fentanyl 50 μg IV, patients were allowed to self-administer 2 ml bolus doses of either alfentanil 250 μg/ml, midazolam 0.4 mg/ml, or propofol 10 mg/ml at minimal intervals of 3 minutes to supplement a basal infusion rate of 5 ml/hr.

Measurements and Main Results: The total intraoperative dosages of alfentanil, midazolam, and propofol were 2.7 ± 1.1 mg, 4.7 ± 2.7 mg, and 114 ± 42 mg, respectively, for procedures lasting 48 ± 28 minutes to 51 ± 19 minutes (means ± SD). Propofol produced more pain on injection (39% vs. 4% and 6% in the alfentanil and midazolam groups, respectively). Episodes of arterial oxygen saturation less than 90% were more frequent with alfentanil (28%) than with midazolam (3%) or propofol (13%). Using the visual analog scale, patients reported comparable levels of discomfort, anxiety, and sedation during the operation in all three treatment groups. Postoperative picture recall was significantly decreased with midazolam versus alfentanil and propofol. Finally, postoperative nausea was reported more frequently in the alfentanil group (29%) than in the midazolam (10%) or propofol (18%) groups, contributing to a significant prolongation of the discharge time in the alfentanil-treated patients.

Conclusions: When self-administered as adjuvants during local anesthesia using a PCA delivery system, alfentanil, midazolam, and propofol were equally acceptable to patients. However, propofol and midazolam were associated with fewer perioperative complications than was alfentanil.     

Anaesthetic induction with alfentanil: comparison with thiopental, midazolam, and etomidate

The speed, side effects and cardiovascular changes associated with anaesthetic induction and endotracheal intubation following alfentanil (20 micrograms/kg/min, IV), thiopental (84 micrograms/kg/min, IV), etomidate (5 micrograms/kg/min, IV) and midazolam (20 micrograms/kg/min, IV) prior to halothane-nitrous oxide general anaesthesia were evaluated and compared in 80 patients undergoing elective general surgical operations. Anaesthetic induction was fastest with etomidate and thiopental (approximately one minute) and slowest with midazolam (about two minutes). Systolic arterial blood pressure (SBP) was decreased at the moment of unconsciousness with thiopental but unchanged with the other compounds. Heart rate (HR) was increased at unconsciousness with midazolam and thiopental but unchanged with etomidate and alfentanil. After intubation HR was increased in all groups except those induced with alfentanil. Arrhythmias were infrequent (5 per cent or less in all groups). Rigidity during induction only occurred with alfentanil (55 per cent) and pain on injection only with etomidate (35 per cent) and alfentanil (5 per cent). Postoperative vomiting was infrequent in all groups (15 per cent) except etomidate (55 per cent). No patient remembered any aspect of laryngoscopy or the operation and all rapidly regained consciousness at the end of operation. The results of this study demonstrate that with the exception of rigidity (which is easily overcome with succinylcholine) and a slightly slower onset of action, alfentanil compares favourably as an induction agent with thiopental and is better than midazolam and etomidate. Alfentanil is superior to all three other induction agents with respect to cardiovascular stability during induction and intubation.     

Subarachnoid bupivacaine blockade decreases midazolam and thiopental hypnotic requirements

Study Objective: To test the hypothesis that subarachnoid bupivacaine blockade decreases hypnotic requirements for thiopental sodium and midazolam.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: Teaching hospital.

Patients: 53 nonpremedicated ASA physical status I and II adult male patients scheduled for elective lower abdominal, pelvic, or lower limb surgery.

Interventions: Intravenous injections of midazolam or thiopental were administered with or without subarachnoid bupivacaine blockade (12.5 mg) at the L₃–L₄ level. Thiopental or midazolam hypnotic requirements were determined using loss of ability to open eyes in response to verbal command as an endpoint. The thiopental requirements were determined by titration; the midazolam requirements were determined from dose-response curves obtained with bolus injections of predetermined doses of the drug.

Measurements and Main Results: Subarachnoid bupivacaine blockade decreased the hypnotic dose of thiopental from 3.40 ± 0.68 mg/kg (mean ± SD) with a dose range of 2.3 to 4.5 mg/kg (intramuscular saline) to 2.17 ± 0.48 mg/kg with a dose range of 1.3 to 2.8 mg/kg (p < 0.005 for the difference). The ED₅₀ value of midazolam decreased with the bupivacaine blockade, from 0.23 mg/kg (95% confidence limits: 0.08 to 0.38 mg/kg) to 0.06 mg/kg (0.01 to 0.14 mg/kg), with p < 0.0001 for the difference.

Conclusion: Subarachoid bupivacaine blockade decreases hypnotic requirements for both thiopental and midazolam. The results suggest that the reduction in hypnotic requirements is due to the decrease in afferent input induced by spinal anesthesia.     

Remifentanil with thiopental for tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants

Tracheal intubation may be accomplished with remifentanil and a non-opioid IV anesthetic without a muscle relaxant. In this study, we evaluated in double-blinded, prospective, randomized manner the dose requirements for remifentanil with thiopental without muscle relaxant administration to obtain clinically acceptable intubation conditions and cardiovascular responses. After premedication with midazolam 0.03 mg/kg IV, 105 patients were randomized equally to one of three study groups, each receiving the following: remifentanil 2 micro g/kg (Group I), 3 micro g/kg (Group II), and 4 micro g/kg (Group III). Remifentanil was administered over 30 s, and anesthesia was induced with thiopental 5 mg/kg. Tracheal intubation conditions were assessed by the anesthesiologist performing the intubation as: (a) excellent, (b) satisfactory, (c) fair, and (d) unsatisfactory. There were no statistically significant differences among groups regarding to demographic data. Blood pressure and heart rate did not increase in any group after accomplishing intubation. There was a significant improvement in intubation conditions between Groups I and II, I and III, and II and III (P < 0.001). We conclude that remifentanil 4 micro g/kg administered before thiopental 5 mg/kg provided excellent or satisfactory intubation conditions in 94% of patients and prevented cardiovascular responses to intubation. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated in a double-blinded manner the dose requirements for remifentanil with thiopental without muscle relaxants for obtaining acceptable intubation condition. Our results show that remifentanil 4 micro g/kg administered before thiopental provided excellent or satisfactory intubation condition in 94% of patients.     

Comparison of the efficacy of esmolol and alfentanil to attenuate the hemodynamic responses to emergence and extubation

Study Objective: To define the ability of esmolol and alfentanil to control the hemodynamic changes associated with extubation and emergence.

Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Setting: General surgery operating rooms at a university hospital.

Patients: Forty-two ASA physical status I and II patients without history of cardiac or pulmonary disease undergoing surgery not involving the cranium or thorax.

Interventions: Patients were given either a bolus dose of normal saline followed by an infusion of normal saline, a bolus dose of alfentanil 5 μg/kg followed by an infusion of normal saline, or a bolus dose of esmolol 500 μg/kg followed by an infusion of esmolol 300 μg/kg/min.

Measurements and Main Results: Emergence and extubation resulted in significant increases in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in the placebo group. Alfentanil controlled the responses to emergence but prolonged the time to extubation (p < 0.05). Esmolol significantly controlled the responses to emergence and extubation (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Emergence and extubation after inhalation general anesthesia result in significant increases in BP and HR in healthy patients. An esmolol bolus dose and subsequent infusion significantly attenuated these responses. A small bolus dose of alfentanil minimized the responses to emergence but prolonged the time to extubation and was no longer protective at that point.     

Propofol and alfentanil for sedation during placement of retrobulbar block for cataract surgery

Study Objective: To determine if the addition of alfentanil to propofol is more effective than propofol alone to provide adequate conditions for placement of a retrobulbar block prior to cataract surgery.Design: Randomized, double-blinded study.Setting: Outpatients at a university hospital.Patients: 40 adult ASA physical status I, II, and III outpatients scheduled for elective cataract surgery.Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of four drug combinations prior to the placement of a retrobulbar block: Group 1, propofol alone; Group 2, alfentanil 5 μg/kg plus propofol; Group 3, alfentanil 10 μg/kg plus propofol; Group 4, alfentanil 15 μg/kg plus propofol. All patients were preoxygenated by face mask for two minutes prior to drug administration. The quality of conditions for block placement were determined by: (1) assessing the amount of movement by the patients while the block needle was in place, (2) cooperativeness of the patients during the operation, (3) hemodynamic side effects, (4) incidence and severity of respiratory depression, (5) incidence of nausea and vomiting, (6) recall of placement of the block, and (7) time to discharge from the hospital.Measurements and Main Results: The addition of alfentanil to propofol for sedation prior to placement of the retrobulbar block resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in movement by the patients. However, the highest dose of alfentanil (15 μg/kg) resulted in the greatest frequency (40% of the patients in this group) of respiratory depression (SpO₂ < 90%). All patients were cooperative during the operation and responsive to verbal command within 5 minutes of placement of the block. In addition, all of the patients denied being nauseated, having vomited, or recalling block placement in the recovery room or the next day.Conclusions: The combination of alfentanil and propofol may be used to sedate patients in order to limit movement and provide a cooperative, alert patient with stable hemodynamics and limited respiratory depression during placement of retrobulbar block prior to ophthalmic surgery. However, excessive dosage of these drugs may result in hazardous respiratory depression in this patient population.     

The effects of preanesthetic oral clonidine on total requirement of propofol for general anesthesia

Study Objective: To investigate the effects of preanesthetic oral clonidine on total propofol requirement for uniform minor surgery (breast conservative surgery: breast cancer removal with axillary lymph node dissection), and to compare the action of clonidine with that of preanesthetic oral diazepam, a commonly used benzodiazepine.

Design: Randomized double-blinded study.

Setting: Operating room ASA physical status I and II room and recovery room of the cancer center.

Patients: 80 breast cancer patients scheduled for surgery.

Interventions: Patients were randomized to one of four treatment groups (placebo, clonidine 75 μg, or 150 μg of clonidine, or 10 mg of diazepam were orally administered 60 min before induction of anesthesia); n = 20 per group. After evaluating the sedation and anxiety levels of patients using a visual analog scale, anesthesia was induced with propofol (1.5 mg/kg), and maintained with oxygen (O₂): nitrous oxide (N₂O) (30:70) with a continuous infusion of propofol. The propofol infusion was started at 10 mg/kg/h for 10 minutes, then decreased to 8 mg/kg/h, and 6 mg/kg/h thereafter, and the rate of infusion was adjusted to obtain adequate anesthesia (maintaining hemodynamic parameters within 20% of that prior to premedication). Fentanyl 0.2 mg (each 0.1 mg was given for intubation and axillary lymph node dissection, respectively) was administered.

Measurements and Main Results: Preanesthetic oral clonidine (150 μg) and diazepam (10 mg) induced anxiolysis without sedation. The total requirement (the mean infusion rates) of propofol in placebo, clonidine 75 μg, clonidine 150 μg, and 10 mg of diazepam groups were 841 ± 70 (9.0 ± 0.3), 720 ± 63 (7.1 ± 0.4), 491 ± 39 (5.6 ± 0.2), and 829 ± 77 mg (7.9 ± 0.4 mg/kg/h), respectively. The cost of propofol in these groups was $51.0 ± 3.8, $45.5 ± 3.2, $33.5 ± 2.3, and $50.5 ± 4.4, respectively.

Conclusions: Preanesthetic oral clonidine (150 μg) but not diazepam (10 mg) reduced the total requirement of propofol while stabilizing hemodynamic parameters. In addition, 150 μg of oral clonidine attenuates the hemodynamic responses associated with tracheal intubation.     

Pharmacodynamic effects of three doses of ORG 9426 used for endotracheal intubation in humans

Study Objective: To determine the pharmacodynamic characteristics of three incremental doses of ORG 9426 used for endotracheal intubation in patients.

Design: Double-blind, randomized administration of one of three doses of intravenous ORG 9426.

Setting: Inpatients requiring surgery at Georgetown University Medical Center.

Patients: Thirty-six patients, ages 18 to 65, ASA physical status I, II, and III, scheduled for general surgery.

Interventions: After Georgetown University Institutional Review Board approval and patient consent, patients were premeditated with midazolam or droperidol. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium and fentanyl. Anesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. The ulnar nerve was stimulated supramaximally with a 2 Hz train-of four (TOF) every 20 seconds. Thumb contractions were measured with a force transducer. When TOF and anesthesia were stable, 2, 2.5, or 3 times the ED₉₅ of ORG 9426 (570 μg/kg 710 μg/kg or 850 μg/kg) was administered randomly. Tracheal intubation was attempted at maximal depression of the first TOF response (T₁).

Measurements and Main Results: The following parameters were measured: time interval from the injection of ORG 9426 to 90% depression of T₁ (T₁ 90% block), maximal T₁ depression (onset time), intubating conditions, clinical duration (time for return of T₁ to 25% of control), heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and any adverse clinical experience. ORG 9426 provided adequate intubating conditions in all patients but two, independent of the dose used. Its onset time was rapid, but increasing the dose did not shorten the onset. T₁ 90% block was achieved rapidly (75 ± 25 seconds to 78 ± 18 seconds, means ± SD). The clinical duration of ORG 9426 was relatively short and lengthened with increasing doses (from 36 ± 18 minutes at 570 μg/kg to 42 ±10 minutes at 850 μg/kg. Spontaneous twitch recovery from 10% to 25% was similar in all dosage groups (5 ± 1 minutes to 6 ± 4 minutes). No clinically significant changes in HR and BP and no adverse clinical experiences were noted in any group.

Conclusion: These findings warrant further clinical evaluation of ORG 9426 for induction and maintenance of muscle relaxation in humans.     

Time to peak effect of neostigmine at antagonism of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block

Study Objective: (1) To determine the time to peak effect of neostigmine (time to peak antagonism) during atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block; and (2) to determine the effect on time to peak effect of neostigmine during atracurium-induced neuromuscular block, when the dose of neostigmine is increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.

Design: Prospective, randomized clinical study.

Setting: Gynecologic operating room suite at a university hospital.

Patients: 45 ASA I and II women admitted for gynecologic laparotomy.

Interventions: Anesthesia was performed with thiopental sodium, fentanyl, halothane, nitrous oxide, and atracurium or vecuronium. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and mechanomyography were used to monitor neuromuscular transmission. Neostigmine was administered while a constant degree of neuromuscular block was maintained at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11% of the control twitch height, using a continuous infusion of atracurium or vecuronium. The patients were randomized to three groups, with 15 patients in each group. Group 1 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; group 2 received vecuronium block antagonized with neostigmine 35 μg/kg; and group 3 received atracurium block antagonized with neostigmine 70 μg/kg.

Measurements and Main Results: The degree of neuromuscular block at antagonism was similar in the three groups. Time to peak effect (mean ± SD) on TOF ratio was significantly longer in Group 1 (9.7 ± 3.0 minutes) versus Group 2 (6.6 ± 1.4 minutes; (p < 0.05). The time to peak effect on TOF ratio during atracurium-induced block was reduced from 9.7 ± 3.0 minutes to 6.3 ± 2.0 minutes when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg (p < 0.05). The peak effect on TOF ratio was significantly greater in Group 3 compared with Group 1 (p < 0.05), while it was similar in groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion: The time to peak effect of neostigmine 35 μg/kg is about 6 to 10 minutes when antagonizing a constant degree of atracurium- or vecuronium-induced neuromuscular block at a twitch height at a point between 4% and 11%. Even though the time to peak effect was longer with atracurium than with vecuronium, clinically significant differences between the antagonizing effect of atracurium versus vecuronium block were not demonstrated. The time to peak effect during atracurium-induced block decreased when the dose of neostigmine was increased from 35 μg/kg to 70 μg/kg.     

The effect of topical lignocaine on intubating conditions after propofol-alfentanil induction

Background: Recent studies have found satisfactory conditions for intubation of the trachea without using muscle relaxants using an intravenous technique combining propofol and alfentanil. In this study we evaluate intubating conditions with this method and either lignocaine applied topically in the larynx and trachea or placebo.
Methods: Sixty adult patients of ASA class I were premedicated with diazepam 15–20 mg and randomly allocated to one of two groups. For induction of anaesthesia both groups were given propofol 2.5 mg/kg and alfentanil 30 μg/kg. One group received 4 ml of lignocaine 40 mg/ml (≤3 mg/kg) topically into the larynx and trachea (group L), the other group an equal amount of isotonic saline (group S) in a double-blind design. Intubation conditions were assessed as excellent, good, moderately good, poor or impossible, scored on the basis of jaw relaxation, ease of insertion of the tube and coughing on intubation.
Results: The total score for group L was significantly better than the score for group S ( P <0.0001) with significant differences with respect to ease of intubation and coughing after intubation.
Conclusions: Induction of anaesthesia with propofol 2.5 mg/kg and alfentanil 30 μg/kg combined with 4 ml of lignocaine-spray 40 mg/ml into the larynx and trachea offered consistent and satisfactory intubation conditions. We thus recommend this method for tracheal intubation, where the use of muscle relaxants is not indicated.     

Fentanyl versus sufentanil basic anesthesia. Hypnotic effect, muscle rigidity and efficacy of competitive muscle relaxants

As induction agents for cardioanesthesia, sufentanil (S) and fentanyl (F) are usually employed in combination with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. We investigated potential interactions of these opioids with the relaxant component, paying special regard to the role of muscular rigidity and opioid-induced alterations of hemodynamics. Narcotic anesthesia was induced randomly in 45 coronary artery bypass patients with either F (20 micrograms/kg) or S (4 micrograms/kg). After 6 min, neuromuscular blockade was initiated within each group randomly with either vecuronium (V) or pancuronium (P) (0.01 mg/kg each). During opiate administration, the times for cessation of spontaneous respiration and loss of responsiveness to verbal and tactile stimuli were measured. The degree of opiate-induced muscular rigidity, simultaneous changes in arterial paCO2, cardiac indices (CI) prior to opioid and relaxant administration, onset and recovery from neuromuscular blockade (by electromyographic train-of-four registration), and motor response to laryngoscopy and intubation were recorded. The onset of spontaneous apnea (TK = time to breathing upon command only) and unresponsiveness (TM = time to controlled mask ventilation) was significantly faster with S than with F. Muscular rigidity was moderate in 25% of patients and severe in 35%-40%, during the administration of both narcotics. No significant differences between S and F were observed. During ventilation by face mask, patients with clinically apparent rigidity showed a statistically significant mean increase in paCO2.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Failure of two benzodiazepines to prevent suxamethonium-induced muscle pain

In a randomised double-blind trial carried out on fit, unpremedicated patients undergoing standard minor operations with early postoperative mobility, using a standard form of anaesthesia, pretreatment with diazepam 0.15 mg/kg or midazolam 0.1 mg/kg failed to reduce significantly the incidence of postoperative muscle pains following suxamethonium 1 mg/kg. By contrast, tubocurarine 0.05 mg/kg proved to be effective as a pretreatment. Neither benzodiazepine influenced the incidence or severity of fasciculations seen with suxamethonium or the duration of neuromuscular block. Tubocurarine virtually abolished visible fasciculation and, in the dose used, reduced the intensity and duration of the neuromuscular block. There were no clinically significant changes in serum potassium, creatinine phosphokinase or aldolase after suxamethonium, although 5 out of 47 showed an atypical rise in creatinine phosphokinase.     

Effects of prostaglandin E1 on the cardiovascular response to tracheal intubation

Study Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of prostaglandin E, in attenuating the hypertensive response to laryngoscopy and intubation.

Design: Controlled, comparative, and randomized study.

Setting: Induction of anesthesia for elective surgery at a university hospital.

Patients: Thirty normotensive patients (ASA physical status I) undergoing elective surgery divided into three groups. Each group consisted of ten patients.

Interventions: Anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium 5 mglkg intravenously, and tracheal intubation was facilitated with vecuronium 0.2 mglkg. Either 0.3 μglkg of prostaglandin E₁, 0.6 μg/kg of prostaglandin E₁, or saline (control) was injected 15 seconds before starting direct laryngoscopy (within 30 seconds), which was attempted 2 minutes after administration of thiopental sodium and vecuronium.

Measurements and Main Results: Patients receiving saline showed a significant increase in mean arterial pressure and rate-pressure product associated with tracheal intubation. These increases following tracheal intubation were significantly less in prostaglandin E₁-treated patients than in the control group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: A single rapid intravenous administration of prostaglandin E₁ is a practical pharmacologic and safe method to attenuate the hypertensive response to tracheal intubation. The use of 0.6 μglkg of prostaglandin E₁ as a supplement during induction is recommended for reducing the pressor response to intubation on the basis of rate-pressure product and mean arterial pressure , following intubation as an index.     

Ketanserin pretreatment reverses alfentanil-induced muscle rigidity

Systemic pretreatment with ketanserin, a relatively specific type-2 serotonin receptor antagonist, significantly attenuated the muscle rigidity produced in rats by the potent short-acting opiate agonist alfentanil. Following placement of subcutaneous electrodes in each animal's left gastrocnemius muscle, rigidity was assessed by analyzing root-mean-square electromyographic activity. Intraperitoneal ketanserin administration at doses of 0.63 and 2.5 mg/kg prevented the alfentanil-induced increase in electromyographic activity compared with animals pretreated with saline. Chlordiazepoxide at doses up to 10 mg/kg failed to significantly influence the rigidity produced by alfentanil. Despite the absence of rigidity, animals that received ketanserin (greater than 0.31 mg/kg i.p.) followed by alfentanil were motionless, flaccid, and less responsive to external stimuli than were animals receiving alfentanil alone. Rats that received ketanserin and alfentanil exhibited less rearing and exploratory behavior at the end of the 60-min recording period than did animals that received ketanserin alone. These results, in combination with previous work, suggest that muscle rigidity, a clinically relevant side-effect of parenteral narcotic administration, may be partly mediated via serotonergic pathways. Pretreatment with type-2 serotonin antagonists may be clinically useful in attenuating opiate-induced rigidity, although further studies will be necessary to assess the interaction of possibly enhanced CNS, cardiovascular, and respiratory depression.     

Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propofol

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In some situations, the use of muscle relaxants (neuromuscular blocking drugs) are undesirable or contraindicated. We compared intubating conditions without muscle relaxants in premedicated patients receiving either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind study, 80 healthy patients were assigned to one of four groups (n = 20). After intravenous atropine, alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2, 3 or 4 microg kg(-1) were injected over 90 s followed by propofol 2 mg kg(-1). Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol, laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation were attempted. Intubating conditions were assessed as excellent, good or poor on the basis of ease of lung ventilation, jaw relaxation, laryngoscopy, position of the vocal cords, and patient response to intubation and slow inflation of the endotracheal tube cuff. RESULTS: Seven patients who received remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1) and one patient who received remifentanil 3 microg kg(-1) could not be intubated at the first attempts. Excellent intubating conditions (jaw relaxed, vocal cords open and no movement in response to tracheal intubation and cuff inflation) were observed in those who received either alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) (45% of patients) or remifentanil in doses of 2 microg kg(-1) (20%), 3 microg kg(-1) (75%) or 4 microg kg(-1) (95%). Overall, intubating conditions were significantly better (P < 0.05), and the number of patients showing excellent conditions were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in patients who received remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) compared with those who received alfentanil 40 microg kg(-1) or remifentanil 2 microg kg(-1). No patient needed treatment for hypotension or bradycardia. CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil 4 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg kg(-1) administered in sequence intravenously provided good or excellent conditions for tracheal intubation in all patients without the use of muscle relaxants.     

"Self-taming": an alternative to the prevention of succinylcholine-induced pain

Muscle pain associated with single-bolus administration of suxamethonium is reported to be one of the common complications of this technique. Since suxamethonium is the most commonly used relaxant in our department and priming with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants is also reported to be linked with complications, while the literature concerning this problem is very contradictory, we wondered if the so-called "self-taming" method represents an alternative to pretreatment with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants. One hundred thirty-two patients (69 male, 63 female) were randomly allocated to three groups. Anesthesia was induced with thiopentone 7 mg/kg body weight. Group 1 (n = 44) was pretreated with 2 mg pancuronium bromide 3 min prior to full relaxation with suxamethonium 1.5 mg/kg. Group 2 (n = 43) received no pretreatment. Group 3 (n = 45) received 4 mg suxamethonium i.v. after induction. One minute later the remaining dose of suxamethonium was applied ("self-taming"). Muscle fasciculation and postoperative myalgia were verified by means of a score. Neuromuscular transmission was recorded on a monitor after controlled train-of-four stimulus and time of onset of neuromuscular blockade was measured. With regard to muscle fasciculation, postoperative pain, and onset of neuromuscular blockade, "self-taming" with suxamethonium yielded results identical to pretreatment with pancuronium bromide. It may therefore be considered as an alternative to pretreatment with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants.     

Studies of midazolam, diazepam and thiopentone on respiratory and cardiovascular function during induction anesthesia

In this study, the effects of midazolam (M), diazepam (D) and thiopentone (T) on respiratory and cardiovascular systems were compared. The patients were randomly divided into 6 groups, besides minute ventilatory volume (MV), onset of induction and cardiovascular changes were also observed. Induction was performed by a bolus injection of one of the following: midazolam (0.3 mg/kg), diazepam (0.3 mg/kg) or thiopentone (5 mg/kg). Five minutes later, 5 micrograms/kg fentanyl and 1.5-2.0 mg/kg succinylcholine were administered. The results showed that: (1) Inhibitory effect on MV was not prominent and similar after use of midazolam and diazepam but was remarkable after thiopental; (2) As for the onset, midazolam was faster than diazepam but slower than thiopentone; (3) Hemodynamic changes of midazolam, diazepam and thiopentone were similar, however during intubation, cardiovascular response was the least in midazolam, diazepam the intermediate and thiopentone the most significant. We conclude that midazolam is a water-soluble, safe and effective inductive anesthetic with its short eliminated half-life period, and much lesser venous irritation, and it is certainly superior to both diazepam and thiopentone.     

Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: a technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil.

We have noted that tracheal intubation can be accomplished in many patients after induction of anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without the simultaneous use of muscle relaxants. This study was designed to evaluate airway and intubating conditions after administration of propofol and alfentanil in 75 ASA physical status I or II outpatients with Mallampati class I airways undergoing various surgical procedures. The patients were randomly assigned to one of five groups for induction of anesthesia. All patients received midazolam 1 mg IV before induction of anesthesia. Group I patients (n = 15) received d-tubocurarine 3 mg, thiamylal 4 mg/kg, and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg IV. Groups II-V patients (n = 15 each) received alfentanil 30, 40, 50, or 60 micrograms/kg followed by propofol 2 mg/kg IV. No muscle relaxants were given to patients in groups II-V. Airway management was performed by one of the authors who was blinded as to the dose of alfentanil administered. After loss of consciousness, patients' lungs were ventilated via face mask, and the ease of ventilation was recorded. Jaw mobility was also assessed. Ninety seconds after administration of the propofol or thiamylal, laryngoscopy was performed and exposure of the glottis and position of the vocal cords were noted. Intubation of the trachea was performed and patient response was noted. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were also recorded before induction of anesthesia, after induction, and then again after intubation of the trachea. The lungs of all patients were easily ventilated via mask, and the jaw was judged to be relaxed in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Physiology of alfentanil-induced rigidity

The authors investigated the hemodynamic, metabolic, electroencephalographic (EEG), and electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of narcotic-induced rigidity during induction of anesthesia with alfentanil (175 micrograms/kg) in 10 patients. Thiopental (4 mg/kg) was administered to a ten-patient control group. Rigidity was quantified in eight muscle groups (sternocleidomastoid, deltoid, biceps, forearm flexors, intercostal, rectus abdominus, vastus medialis/lateralis, and gastrocnemius). Marked rigidity was observed in all muscle groups in all patients receiving alfentanil and in none receiving thiopental. Central venous pressure increased with onset of rigidity, while mean arterial pressure and cardiac index remained unchanged. Manual ventilation was extremely difficult during alfentanil-induced rigidity. Arterial oxygen tension decreased more rapidly during rigidity than during the same time interval in the control group, while patients experiencing rigidity were more acidotic, as reflected by greater increases in base deficit. The EEG demonstrated an anesthetic state without seizure activity. The immediate increase in central venous pressure with the onset of rigidity, along with occasional simultaneous parallel variations in central venous pressure and the EMG, strongly suggest a mechanical mechanism for the change in central venous pressure. The metabolic changes during rigidity may be partly related to the absence of the normal cardiovascular reflexes that are reported to occur during voluntary isometric muscle contractions. A neurochemical mechanism of narcotic-induced rigidity is briefly reviewed.     

Influence of thiopental and propofol on postoperative cognitive recovery in the elderly patient undergoing general anesthesia

Study Objective: To assess mental and psychomotor recovery following induction of anesthesia with thiopental or propofol in elderly patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Design: Randomized, prospective, double-blind study.

Setting: Large referral hospital.

Patients: 40 elderly patients ASA physical status I-III (>65 years) undergoing abdomino-pelvic surgery with an estimated surgical time of at least 90 minutes.

Interventions: All patients received combined epidural-general anesthesia. After establishing a T₆ sensory blockade, patients were randomized to receive either thiopental or propofol for induction of general anesthesia. The induction drug was slowly titrated until loss of eyelash reflex was noted. Thereafter, all patients received desflurane (2% to 3% end-tidal) and 70% nitrous oxide (N₂O) in oxygen for maintenance of general anesthesia. To facilitate tracheal intubation, intravenous alfentanil 10 μg/kg and atracurium 0.4 mg/kg were administered. Perioperative analgesia was maintained with epidural bupivacaine.

Measurements and Main Results: A digit substitution test (DSST) and shape-sorter test, as well as patient-generated 100-mm visual analog score (VAS; 0 = minimal and 100 = maximal) for anxiety, sleepiness, and coordination, were performed during the preanesthetic interview, on postanesthesia care unit admission, and at 15, 45, 90, and 120 minutes thereafter. To induce loss of consciousness, either thiopental 2.5 ± 1.0 mg/kg or propofol 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/kg was administered. The mean anesthetic time was 109 ± 30 minutes and 114 ± 38 minutes for the thiopental and propofol groups, respectively. Emergence, extubation, and orientation times, as well as time to follow commands, were unaffected by patient randomization. Similarly, the DSST and shape-sorter tests, in addition to the patient-generated VAS for pain, anxiety, and coordination, were similar among groups. However, irrespective of treatment modality, return to baseline digit substitution and shape-sorter scores were significantly delayed (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: When compared to thiopental, propofol does not facilitate improved cognitive recovery in geriatric patients undergoing prolonged surgery.