Pulmonary function changes in long-term survivors of chronic myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a Taiwan experience

Pulmonary function in 42 patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) was tested before and after HLA-matched (39 related, 3 unrelated) allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) between 1985 and 1999. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) including ventilatory capacity, lung volumes, and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) were performed before and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after BMT, and every 12 months thereafter. Possible pre- and post-BMT risk factors were evaluated for their influence on pulmonary function. Patients were divided into two groups according to their survival duration for more than 12 months or not. Pretransplant PFTs were essentially normal except for mild reduction in DLCO values in the short-term survival group. Overall pulmonary function changes revealed persistent and significant decrease of forced vital capacity (FVC) and DLCO values after BMT. The DLCO values reached abnormal levels (< 80%) and showed a trend of incomplete recovery. Decrease of forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and vital capacity were also noted but the FEV1/FVC ratio remained within normal limits after BMT. Transient fall of total lung capacity after BMT was noted. However, its values did not reach abnormal levels such as to cause restrictive ventilatory impairment. Possible risk factors including gender, smoking, bronchiolitis obliterans, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) were found to have significant influences on posttransplant pulmonary function changes by multiple regression analysis. Most patients except those who developed bronchiolitis obliterans were clinically asymptomatic. Development of bronchiolitis obliterans was the most important factor to cause both clinical symptoms and impaired pulmonary function. In summary, pulmonary function changes before and after HLA-matched allogeneic BMT in long-term survivors of CML only showed modest dysfunction. The primary negative presentation with the development of oxygenation defect had no clinical significance in most patients. The influences on the impairment of pulmonary function were multifactorial.     

Liver transplantation]

In western countries, liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been performed with the use of grafts from brain dead donors, while in Japan this has begun being performed using partial liver grafts from living donors. This report describes our current results after liver transplantation for HCC and domino liver transplantation, which was introduced to resolve the organ shortage.     

Liver transplantation in malignant disease

Liver transplantation for malignant disease has gained increasing attention as part of transplant oncology. Following the implementation of the Milan criteria, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was the first generally accepted indication for transplantation in patients with cancer. Subsequently, more liberal criteria for HCC have been developed, and research on this topic is still ongoing. The evident success of liver transplantation for HCC has led to the attempt to extend its indication to other malignancies. Regarding perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, more and more evidence supports the use of liver transplantation, especially after neoadjuvant therapy. In addition, some data also show a benefit for selected patients with very early stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma is a very rare but nonetheless established indication for liver transplantation in primary liver cancer. In contrast, patients with hepatic angiosarcoma are currently not considered to be optimal candidates. In secondary liver tumors, neuroendocrine cancer liver metastases are an accepted but comparability rare indication for liver transplantation. Recently, some evidence has been published supporting the use of liver transplantation even for colorectal liver metastases. This review summarizes the current evidence for liver transplantation for primary and secondary liver cancer.     

Liver transplantation for malignancy

Liver transplantation for hepatic malignancies has emerged from an exotic and desperate approach to a well-documented and proven treatment modality for these unfortunate patients. However, early unsatisfactory results emphasized that only a highly selected patient population would benefit from transplantation. Currently, <10% of all liver transplants performed are for hepatocellular cancer (HCC). There is no controversy that hepatoblastoma is an excellent indication in pediatric patients with unresectable tumors. Similarly, liver transplantation for HCC in the adult population yields good results for patients whose tumor masses do not exceed the Milan criteria. It remains to be determined whether patients with more extensive tumors can be reliably selected to benefit from the procedure. Adjunctive procedures like radiofrequency ablation, chemoembolization, or cryotherapy might be indicated to limit tumor progression for patients on waiting lists. Epitheloid hemangioendothelioma is also an appropriate indication for liver transplantation, unlike angiosarcoma. Metastatic liver disease is not an indication for liver transplantation, with the exception of cases in which the primary is a neuroendocrine tumor, for which liver transplantation can result in long-term survival and even cure in a number of patients. And finally, while gallbladder cancers are never an indication for liver transplantation, rare cases of cholangiocellular cancer might qualify if aggressive combination therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by OLT, are carried through. Survival in these selected patients can approach that for patients with cholestatic liver disease.     

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: an update

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide and the most common primary hepatic malignancy. It arises on a background of hepatic cirrhosis in approximately 95% of the cases in the United States. A wide variety of treatment modalities have been applied in the treatment of HCC. Liver transplantation has emerged as the preferred treatment for patients with small HCC. Transplantation for patients whose tumors do not exceed the Milan criteria yields results equivalent to those of transplantation for non-HCC indications. Controversy now exists regarding the use of living donors, expansion of selection criteria, and role of adjuvant therapy.     

Aggressive cutaneous malignancies following cardiothoracic transplantation: the Australian experience

BACKGROUND: The development of malignancies in recipients of a cardiothoracic transplant (CTT)--that is, heart, lung, or heart and lung recipients-is of concern. Cutaneous and lymphoproliferative malignancies comprise the two major groups of malignancies encountered. A small subgroup of patients will develop potentially life-threatening aggressive cutaneous malignancies (ACM); these are poorly defined and documented in the literature. The authors report the results for 619 CTT recipients from a single institution. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1995, 619 recipients received a CTT. With a minimum follow-up of 2 years, 66 patients (10.7%) were diagnosed with a major malignancy, and 27 of these 66 patients developed ACM. ACM were defined as having one or more of the following characteristics: local invasion and/or regional metastases at diagnosis, poor differentiation, and locoregional and/or systemic relapse following therapy. All malignant melanomas were considered ACM. Data on malignancy occurrence were documented in the clinical notes of the heart and lung transplant unit. A retrospective analysis was undertaken from these notes. RESULTS: Tumor histology was predominantly poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (55%) (SCC) and malignant melanoma (30%) (MM). No patient developed Kaposi sarcoma (KS). The median time from transplant to diagnosis of ACM was 52 months (range, 8-127 months). Thirteen of 27 patients have died; 10 of them died of metastatic disease. The mean time to death was 20 months (range, 8-54 months). Of 14 patients alive, 5 have disease. All but one of the 19 patients diagnosed with nonmelanoma ACM received radiotherapy, either as part of initial treatment or on relapse. Eight patients have subsequently suffered an infield relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The development of ACM in CTT recipients resulted in substantial morbidity and mortality. Poor results were obtained with standard surgery and radiotherapy. Treatment modalities for and the underlying pathobiology of ACM in organ transplant recipients require detailed research if improved outcomes are to be achieved.     

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Liver transplantation has emerged as an optimal treatment for stage I and II hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with underlying cirrhosis as it provides a treatment for the underlying liver disease as well as a reduced incidence of recurrent cancer. The current system of organ allocation in the United States allows an opportunity for liver transplantation for patients with tumor burden within the Milan criteria (a single tumor 2-5 cm or up to 3 lesions with none >3 cm). Outcomes of patients receiving transplants within these criteria approach outcomes for patients receiving transplants for all indications (85.9%, 74.8%, and 64.1% actuarial survival at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively, for those with HCC receiving transplants compared with 82%, 73%, and 67% for the entire cohort). Transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, and other pretransplant treatment modalities aimed to slowing tumor growth for patients on a transplant waiting list are commonly used, although the impact on pretransplant disease progression or posttransplant survival remains uncertain. There is continued controversy over expanding patient selection criteria, in particular for those who have undergone downstaging of tumors. In addition, the role of certain immunosuppressive agents such as sirolimus in the reducing HCC recurrence posttransplant remains unclear.     

LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATIC CANCER

ＬＩＶＥＲＴＲＡＮＳＰＬＡＮＴＡＴＩＯＮＦＯＲＨＥＰＡＴＩＣＣＡＮＣＥＲＸｉａＳｕｉｓｈｅｎｇ夏穗生（ＩｎｓｔｉｔｕｔｅｏｆＯｒｇａｎＴｒａｎｓｐｌａｎｔａｔｉｏｎ，ＴｏｎｇｊｉＭｅｄｉｃａｌＵｎｉｖｅｒｓｉｔｙ，Ｗｕｈａｎ４３００３０）Ａｂｓｔｒａ...     

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer death, particularly in Asia where the major etiology, chronic hepatitis B virus infection, is endemic. The tumor frequently develops in a background of cirrhosis, and liver transplantation offers a chance to cure both the tumor and the underlying cirrhosis. The Milan criteria based on tumor size and number as an estimate of tumor burden are conventionally the gold standard in determining eligibility for transplantation, and the outcome is excellent. The shortage of organs from deceased donors has curtailed the adoption of extended criteria and led to the problems of long waiting times and dropouts. Several measures have been taken to tackle these issues, including prioritization of patients with HCC, use of pretransplant adjuvant treatment to prevent tumor progression, and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). With a high incidence of HCC and a low organ donation rate, Asia has developed a distinctive pattern of indication and strategy in the application of liver transplantation. Over the last decade, the number of liver transplants in Asia has increased rapidly, by 10-fold, largely as a result of the development of LDLT. The proportion of patients who undergo liver transplantation for HCC is increasing and HCC comprises one third of the indication for liver transplantation in Asia. LDLT is the dominant strategy, accounting for 96% of the liver transplants for HCC. Many transplant programs accept patients beyond the Milan criteria, and the reported 3-year survival rate is about 60%. With the promotion of organ donation, better quantification of the benefit of LDLT for extended indications, and identification of predictors for survival, the practice of liver transplantation for HCC in Asia will continue to evolve.     

Liver transplantation for unresectable malignancies: Beyond hepatocellular carcinoma

Indications for liver transplantation have expanded over the past few decades owing to improved outcomes and better understanding of underlying pathologies. In particular, there has been a growing interest in the field of transplant oncology in recent years that has led to considerable developments which have pushed the boundaries of malignant indications for liver transplantation beyond hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this article, we review and summarise the published evidence for liver transplantation in non-HCC primary and metastatic liver malignancies and highlight ongoing clinical trials that address unresolved questions therein. We also examine the current technical, immunological and oncological challenges that face liver transplantation in this growing field and explore potential approaches to overcome these barriers.     

肝移植治疗原发性肝癌88例临床分析

目的 探讨肝移植治疗原发性肝癌的临床意义。方法 回顾性分析88例原发性肝癌行原位肝移植患者的临床资料。按照国际抗癌联盟（UICC）制定的肝癌pTNM分期标准,随访比较不同分期患者12个月的肿瘤复发和生存情况。结果 术后12个月时,Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期复发率分别为0、4．8％、40．0％和71．3％（P〈0．01）;Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ期生存率分别为100％、95．2％、71．5％和41．7％（P〈0．01）。结论 Ⅰ、Ⅱ期原发性肝癌适合行肝移植治疗,而Ⅳ期肝癌不是肝移植手术适应证。     

Liver transplantation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

The rise of infection with hepatitis C virus worldwide and the lack of effective treatment for this infection has led to a rise in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Moreover, it is now accepted that the cirrhotic liver, regardless of etiology, is a nidus for tumor formation. A landmark study of 60 patients by Mazzaferro et al, published in 1996, forever changed the way in which surgeons approach this disease. The Milan criteria (one lesion <5 cm or three lesions < 3 cm each) were adopted by the United Network for Organ Sharing in 2002 as the criteria by which patients would be given exception points for liver transplantation for HCC. Resection for HCC in the cirrhotic patient has poor outcomes, and many patients' livers cannot be resected due to underlying portal hypertension and thrombocytopenia. Results of transplantation are excellent, with an 80% 5-year survival. Finally, it has been demonstrated that the use of sirolimus for immunosuppression management in these patients may improve long-term disease-free survival; however, no consensus has been reached across the transplant community.     

Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: the Japanese experience

Treatment strategies against hepatocellular carcinoma have progressed remarkably over the past decade. In Asia, evidence-based guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma have evolved, including the option of liver transplantation. Due to severe organ shortage, however, living donor liver transplantation has become mainstream in Japan. Unlike deceased donor transplantation, living donor transplantation is not limited by the restrictions imposed by the nationwide allocation system. The decision for transplantation often depends on institutional or case-by-case considerations, balancing the will of the donor, the operative risk, and the overall survival benefit for the recipient. Cumulative data from the national multicenter registry analysis as well as individual center experience suggest that expansion of the Milan criteria is warranted.     

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by orthotopic liver transplantation in cholangiocarcinomas: the emory experience

Background

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a bile duct tumor with a grim prognosis. The median survival after radiotherapy of unresectable disease is 9-12 months. The following is a review of our experience with neoadjuvant (NEO) chemoradiation followed by orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for CCA.

Methods

Ten patients with CCAs were selected as candidates for NEO-OLT between 2008-2011. Patients with unresectable CCA above the cystic duct without intra or extrahepatic metastases were eligible. Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients were included due to their poor resection response. Patients initially received external-beam radiation [via conventional fields or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)] plus capecitabine (XEL) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), followed by either Iridium¹⁹² (Ir¹⁹²) brachytherapy high dose rate (HDR) or external boost. 5-FU or XEL was administered until OLT. Patients underwent periodic surveillance computed tomography (CT)/MRIs after OLT. Primary endpoints included actuarial rates (AR)/crude rates (CR) of overall survival (OS), and local control (LC) at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Results

Five males and five females were identified. Mean age was 58.3 years (range, 38-71 years). Mean composite radiation dose delivered was 59.0 Gy (range, 54-71.4 Gy). Forty percent of patients had an HDR boost. Fifty percent of patients received XEL during NEO. Two patients were excluded from the analysis as they did not go on to OLT due to metastases (n=1) and death due to GI bleed (n=1). Thirty-eight percent of the OLT patients had a pathological complete response (pCR) after NEO, while 25% required a Whipple due to positive margins. Median follow-up for the OLT group was 23 months (range, 6.5-37 months). Six, twelve, and twenty-four months LC AR was 100%. LC CR was 100% at longest interval (30 months). Six, twelve, and twenty-four months OS AR was 100%, 87.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. Mean OS AR was 30.2 months (95% CI: 22.8-37.7). OS CR was 75% at longest interval (37 months). Post OLT mortality resulted from (I) unknown causes (0.5 months), (II) allograft rejection (27.25 months). Other toxicities included: necrotic myelitis 12/10 months after NEO/OLT (n=1), post NEO biliary stricture requiring new stent (n=1); post Whipple bile leak repair (n=1), and post OLT fistula (n=1), cholangitis (n=1), and wound revision (n=2).

Conclusions

Our outcomes using NEO-OLT for CCA are promising and comparable to other series. These results further justify (I) use of NEO and (II) prioritization of available transplant livers for CCA management.     

ESHAP as salvage therapy for refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Taiwan experience

BACKGROUND: The ESHAP regimen, a combination of the chemotherapeutic drugs etoposide, methylprednisolone (solumedrol), high-dose cytarabine (ara-C) and cisplatin, has been shown to be active against refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in therapeutic trials. We were interested in determining whether this regimen would be effective and tolerable for Chinese patients. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with refractory/relapsed non-Hodgkins lymphoma (23 intermediate-grade and nine high-grade) were enrolled in this study. Etoposide was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/day as a 1 h intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 4, solumedrol 500 mg/day was given as a 15 min intravenous infusion from day 1 to day 5, ara-C 2 g/m2 was given as a 2 h intravenous infusion on day 5 and cisplatin was given at a dose of 25 mg/m2/day as a continuous infusion from day 1 to day 4. Clinical efficacy and toxicity were assessed on the basis of the WHO criteria. RESULTS: Ten patients (31.3%, 95% Cl 15.2-47.4%) attained complete remission (CR) and seven had partial remission (PR). The overall response rate was 53.1% (95% Cl 35.8-70.4%). In eight of the 10 CR patients, the remission lasted for more than 8 months. The remaining two patients had CR of 5 and 6 months. The median duration of CR was 12.2 months (range 5-22 months). Myelosuppression with subsequent infections was the major toxicity. Severe leukopenia (WBC < 1000/microliter) lasted for an average of 12 days and thrombocytopenia (< 25,000/microliter) 18 days. One patient (3.1%) died of neutropenia-associated sepsis within 4 weeks after treatment. Non-myeloid toxicities included alopecia in 66% (28% grade 2, 22% grade 3), stomatitis in 72% (25% grade 2, 28% grade 3, 13% grade 4), hepatotoxicity in 9% (3% grade 2), renal toxicity in 13% (6% grade 2, 3% grade 3) and infection in 56% (18% grade 2, 25% grade 3, 13% grade 4). The majority of the responders relapsed within 2 years after ESHAP treatment. Median survival for all patients was 8.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: ESHAP is an active and tolerable regimen in Chinese patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma, but the duration of remission is brief and without significant impact on survival.     

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma]

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primitive cancer of the liver. It mostly develops on cirrhotic livers. Orthotopic liver transplantation is the only treatment that definitively addresses both the metachronous occurrence risk of HCC and the underlying disease. Under Milan criteria, i.e. less than 3 nodules of 3 cm max in diameter, or 1 nodule of 5 cm maximum, OLT has been shown effective and provides with survival rates almost equal to those obtained with HCC free cirrhotic patients. In Rennes, 195 patients with early HCC on cirrhotic livers have been transplanted from January 1995 to June 2005. Global and disease free 8 years patient survival rates were 73 and 70%, respectively. These results were significantly altered when the recipient was female, the cirrhosis due to C virus and the patient of B blood group. Despite these excellent results, the principal limit to the application of transplantation for HCC remains the long period of time patients have to wait for a graft. During this period of time, growth of the tumour may drop the patient out of Milan criteria and subsequently from the waiting list. The role of chemoembolisation, liver resection and thermal ablation while the patient is waiting for a graft remains debatable.