Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of ranitidine film tablets in healthy male subjects

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of ranitidine (CAS 66357-35-5) from two different ranitidine hydrochloride (CAS 66357-59-3) film tablets (Ranitab 150 mg film tablets as test preparation and 150 mg film tablets of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 9 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 24 h post-dose, and ranitidine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 461.8 ng/ml (test) and 450.6 ng/ ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC (0-infinity) of 2,488.6 ng . h/ml (test) and 2,528.8 ng . h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 2.83 h (test) and 3.04 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 2.78 h (test) and 2.89 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 91.93 %-106.98 % (AUC (0-infinity) and 92.34%-118.85% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90 % confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 %-125 %.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of a generic amlodipine tablet formulation in healthy male volunteers

Two different tablets containing amlodipine besylate (CAS 111470-99-6) (Vazkor 10 mg tablet as test preparation and 10 mg tablet of the originator product as reference preparation) were investigated in 18 healthy male volunteers in order to compare the bioavailability and prove the bioequivalence between both treatments after oral single dose administration. The study was performed according to an open-label, randomized, two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 21 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 144 h post-dose, and amlodipine plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of 6,183.7 pg/ml (test) and 5,366.7 pg/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 267,231.0 pg x h/ml (test) and 266,061.7 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median tmax was 5.6 h (test) and 6.1 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t 1/2) were 46.46 h (test) and 45.34 h (reference). Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA); 90% confidence intervals were between 93.20%-107.16% (AUC(0-infinity) and 103.36%-123.13% (Cmax). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of Tetrazepam

Two different oral tetrazepam (CAS 10379-14-3) formulations (Tetrazepam-ratiopharm film-coated tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation marketed in France) were investigated in 20 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 50 mg oral dose was given according to a randomised two-way crossover design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of tetrazepam plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 96 h following drug administration. A washout period of 14 days separated both treatment periods. Tetrazepam plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method. Values of 3873.08 ngh/ml (test preparation) and 3930.69 ngh/ml (reference preparation) for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate an nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) of 482.08 ng/ml and 465.14 ng/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 1.39 hours for both preparations. Cmax and AUC0-infinity-values were tested parametrically by an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80%-125% for AUC0-infinity and 70%-143% for Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between the test and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two cefixime formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new cefixime ((6R,7R)-7-[(Z)-2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-2-(carboxymethoxyimino) acetamido]-8-oxo-3-vinyl-5-thia-1-azabicyclo-[4,2,0]-oct-2-ene-2-carboxylic acid, CAS 79350-37-1) tablet preparation (Loprax) was compared with that of a reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers. The trial was designed as an open, randomized, single-blind, two-sequence, two-period crossover study. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 400 mg cefixime tablet as a test or reference formulation on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a one-week washout period. The plasma concentrations of the drug were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-24h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. The mean AUC0-infinity of cefixime was 45008.7 +/- 10989.9 and 45221.3 +/- 2155.7 n x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of cefixime was on average 4746.9 +/- 1284 ng/ml for the test and 4726.3 +/- 1206.9 ng/ml for the reference product. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for test and reference tablets. The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis for the mean test/reference ratios of Cmax, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-24h of cefixime were in the bioequivalence range (94%-112%). Therefore, the two formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Bioequivalence study of two losartan formulations administered orally in healthy male volunteers

The bioavailability of a new losartan preparation (2-butyl-4-chloro-1-[p-(o-1H-tetrazol-5-ylphenyl)benzyl]imidazole-5-methanol monopotassium salt, CAS 114798-26-4) was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 24 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 32. The open, randomized, single-blind two-sequence, two-period crossover study design was performed. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 100 mg losartan as a test or reference formulation. The plasma concentrations of losartan and its active metabolite were analyzed by a rapid and sensitive HPLC method with UV detection. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC0-36h, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, t1/2, and Ke. Values of AUC0-infinity demonstrate nearly identical bioavailability of losartan from the examined formulations. The AUC0-infinity of losartan was 2019.92+/-1002.90 and 2028.58+/-837.45 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The AUC0-infinity of the metabolite was 10851.52+/-4438.66 and 11041.18 +/-5015.81 ng x h/ml for test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of losartan was 745.94+/-419.75 ng/ml for the test and 745.74+/-329.99 ng/ml for the reference product and the Cmax of the metabolite was 1805.77+/-765.39 and 1606.22 +/-977.22 ng/ml for the test and reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for Cmax and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve for both losartan and its active metabolite. 90 % confidence limits calculated for Cmax and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) of losartan and its metabolite were included in the bioequivalence range (0.8-1.25 for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for losartan and its main active metabolite.     

Bioequivalence study of sultamicillin suspensions

Sultamicillin (CAS 76497-13-7) is a prodrug combination of ampicillin (CAS 69-53-4) and sulbactam (CAS 68373-14-8), with the antibiotic ampicillin and the beta-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam chemically linked as double ester. The present study was performed to investigate the relative bioavailability and to assess the bioequivalence of two different sultamicillin suspensions (Devasid 250 mg/5 ml as test preparation and 375 mg/7.5 ml of the originator product as reference preparation). Twenty-four healthy male volunteers received equal doses of the sultamicillin preparations according to an open, randomised, single-dose, two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 8 h post-dose, and ampicillin and sulbactam plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 11,267.4 ng/ml (ampicillin, test), 10,864.4 ng/ml (ampicillin, reference), 6,360.6 ng/ml (sulbactam, test and 6,410.7 ng/ml (sulbactam, reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) of 17,512.9 ng x h/ml (ampicillin, test), 18,388.0 ng x h/ml (ampicillin, reference), 10,971.7 ng ng x h/ml (sulbactam, test) and 11,181.2 ng x h/ml (sulbactam, reference) were calculated. The median t(max) was 0.69 h (ampicillin, test), 0.85 h (ampicillin, reference), 0.72 h (sulbactam, Devasid) and 0.83 h (sulbactam, reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of 1.04 h (ampicillin, test), 1.03 h (ampicillin, reference), 1.26 h (sulbactam, Devasid) and 1.00 h (sulbactam, reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of ampicillin and sulbactam were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 84.58%-117.80% (AUC(0-infinity), ampicillin), 92.37%-119.93% (C(max), ampicillin), 85.81%-120.50% (AUC(0-infinity), sulbactam) and 88.41%-117.57% (C(max), sulbactam). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of methylprednisolone

Two different oral methylprednisolone (CAS 83-43-2) formulations (Methylprednisolon-ratiopharm 8 mg tables as test preparation (T) and tablets of a reference preparation (R)) were investigated in 16 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 8 mg oral dose was given according to a randomised two-way crossover design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of methylprednisolone plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 16 h following drug administration. A washout period of 3 days separated both treatment periods. Methylprednisolone plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method. Values of 342.53 ng.h/ml (test preparation) and 336.61 ng.h/ml (reference preparation) for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate an nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) of 66.58 ng/ml and 70.51 ng/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 2.2 h for both preparations. Cmax and AUC0-infinity-values were tested parametrically by the two one-sided t-test procedure. Bioequivalence was concluded if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80-125% for AUC0-infinity and 70-143% for Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between Methylprednisolone ratiopharm and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of doxepin

Two different oral doxepin (CAS 1668-195) formulations (Doxepin-ratiopharm 25 mg film-coated tablets as test preparation and 25 mg dragées of the reference preparation) were investigated in 30 healthy male and female volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between these preparations. A single 75 mg oral dose (3 units of test or reference preparation) was given according to a randomised two-way cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentration of doxepin and its metabolite N-desmethyldoxepin were collected at pre-defined time points up to 168 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of three weeks separated both treatment periods. Doxepin and N-desmethyldoxepin plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated LC-MS/MS method. Values of 193,463 pgh/ml (test preparation) and 197,988 pg h/ml (reference preparation) for doxepin as well as values of 313,298 pg h/ml (test preparation) and 306,663 pgh/ml (reference preparation) for N-desmethyldoxepin for the parameter AUC0-infinity demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) for doxepin/N-desmethyldoxepin of 15,960.06/6,883.69 pg/ml and 18,614.73/6,846.62 pg/ml were achieved for test and reference preparation. Time to reach doxepin maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was 1.98 h for both preparations and for N-desmethyldoxepin tmax was 4.52 h (test preparation) and 4.15 h (reference preparation). Cmax and AUC0-infinity values were tested for statistically significant differences by means of the Two One-Sided T-Tests procedure following ln-transformation of data. Bioequivalence was assumed if the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios were in the range of 80%-125% for ln-transformed AUC0-infinity and 70%-143% for ln-transformed Cmax. Based on the results obtained in this study, bioequivalence between the test and the reference preparation was demonstrated.     

Bioavailability investigation of two different oral formulations of citalopram, a so-called 'second generation' antidepressant drug

Citalopram (CAS 59729-33-8) belongs to the so-called 'second generation' antidepressant drugs and is used for the treatment of patients with major depression or other depressive disorders. In the present study, two different oral citalopram formulations (Citalopram-ratiopharm film-coated tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation distributed in Germany) were investigated in 20 healthy volunteers in order to prove bioequivalence between both preparations. A single 40 mg oral dose was administered according to an open, randomised, two-period cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of citalopram plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 168 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of 21 days separated both treatment periods. Citalopram plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method with fluorescence detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), of 34.77 ng/ml (test) and 34.42 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0-infinity) of 1,719.69 ng*h/ml (test) and 1,725.71 ng*h/ml (reference) were determined. The results showed nearly identical rate and extent of drug absorption. Also further pharmacokinetic parameters were well comparable with each other. Thus, tmax showed values of 3.29 h (test) and 3.77 h (reference). The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) was 42.50 h (test) und 44.46 h (reference). Both primary target parameters Cmax and AUC0-infinity were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and Cmax the 90 % confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80 %-125 %.     

Comparative pharmacokinetics of two tablet formulations of amoxicillin: bioequivalence assessment

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of amoxicillin (CAS 26787-78-0) from two different amoxicillin tablets (Demoksil 1 g tablet as test preparation and 1 g tablet of the originator product as reference preparation). The study was conducted according to an open-label, randomised two-period cross-over design with a wash-out phase of 4-7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 10 h post-dose, and amoxicillin plasma concentrations were determined with a validated LC-MS/ MS method. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 13,296.4 ng/ml (test) and 12,797.7 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 39,556.7 ng x h/ml (test) and 38,599.1 ng x h/ml (reference) were calculated. The median t(max) was 1.62 h (test) and 1.54 h (reference). Plasma elimination half-lives (t(1/2)) of 1.64 h (test) and 1.65 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters, AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 96.76%-108.46% (AUC(0-infinity)) and 97.80%-111.98% (C(max)). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters, AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Bioequivalence study of finasteride. Determination in human plasma by high-pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

Two different finasteride (CAS 98319-26-7) tablet formulations were evaluated for their relative bioavailability (Flaxin tablets 5 mg, as the test formulation vs reference formulation, tablets 5 mg) in 23 healthy male volunteers who received a single 5 mg oral dose of each preparation. The study was open, randomized with a two-period crossover design and a 7-day washout period. Plasma samples were obtained over a 48-h interval. The finasteride concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS). The analytical method developed has a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.50 ng/ml in plasma. For the quality control the measured concentration was 2.05 +/- 0.14 ng/ml (mean +/- SD, n = 30) with a precision of 6.9% and an accuracy of 2.55% at a concentration of the starting solution of 2.00 ng/ml, while with 20.00 ng/ml starting solution the measured concentrations were 20 +/- 0.80 ng/ml (n = 30) with a precision of 3.81% and an accuracy of 0.09%. From the plasma finasteride concentration vs time curves the following pharmacokinetics parameters were obtained: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, Cmax/AUC0-48, Ke, elimination half-life and tmax. Geometric mean test/reference formulations individual percent ratio was 95.71 for AUC0-48 h and 88.70% for Cmax. The 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean of the individual ratio test/reference formulations was 95.70-120.20% for AUC0-48 h, 94.60-121.30 for AUC0-infinity and 88.70-108% for Cmax. Since for both Cmax or AUC the 90% Cl values are within the interval proposed by the Food and Drug Administration, the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation for both the rate and extent of absorption after single dose administration.     

Bioavailability study of drotaverine from capsule and tablet preparations in healthy volunteers

The bioavailability of drotaverine (CAS 14009-24-6) was investigated after oral administration of a drotaverine capsule preparation (20 mg Droxa mite) and compared to that of a reference tablet preparation. The preparations were investigated in 23 healthy volunteers, aged between 20 and 27 years, according to a randomised two-way, cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for determination of drotaverine plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 30 h following drug administration. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Drotaverine plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method (UV detector, imipramine HCl salt as an internal standard). The limit of detection was 6 ng/ml. Values of 1593.92 +/- 949.70 ng x h/l (95% confidence interval (CI): 1183.20-2004.60) for the test and 1705.48 +/- 737.78 ng x h/l (95% CI: 1386.40-2024.50) for the reference preparation AUC(0-infinity) demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum concentrations--Cmax of 121.89 +/- 37.03 ng/ml (95% CI: 104.05-139.80) and 121.85 +/- 37.97 ng/ml (95% CI: 107.09-135.74) and time to reach maximum plasma concentration--Tmax of 1.29 +/- 0.42 h (95% CI: 1.11-1.48) and 1.14 +/- 0.34 h (95% CI: 0.99-1.29) achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. The relative bioavailability (AUC(0-infinity) ratio test/reference) and Cmax ratio test/reference were 103.15% (90% CI: 81.68-124.60) and 103.74% (90% CI: 94.10-113.38), respectively. AUC was calculated using two different methods. There were no significant differences between the obtained values. Since the 90% CI for both, AUC and Cmax ratios were within the 80-125% interval proposed by the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products (CPMP) and the Food and Drug Administration, it is concluded that the new drotaverine capsule formulation is therapeutically equivalent to the conventional formulation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalence study of meloxicam tablets in healthy male subjects

Meloxicam (CAS 71125-38-7), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), is used for the treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatic arthritis. In the present study, two different oral meloxicam formulations (Melcam 15 mg tablets as test preparation and tablets of a reference preparation) were investigated in 24 healthy male subjects in order to prove bioequivalence between both preparations. A single 15 mg oral dose was administered according to an open, randomised, two-period cross-over design in the fasted state. Blood samples for the determination of meloxicam plasma concentrations were collected at pre-defined time points up to 96 h following drug administration. A wash-out period of 7-8 days separated both treatment periods. Meloxicam plasma concentrations were determined by means of a validated HPLC method with UV-detection. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 1,146.9 ng/ml (test) and 1,064.8 ng/ml (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity) of 34,499.0 ng x h/ml (test) and 33,784.3 ng x h/ml (reference) were determined. The results showed nearly identical rate and extent of drug absorption. Also further pharmacokinetic parameters were well comparable. Thus, t(max) showed values of 5.00 h for both test and reference. The plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) was 18.29 h (test) und 18.94 h (reference). Both primary target parameters C(max). and AUC(0-infinity, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the 90% confidence intervals were between 99.46%-105.24% (AUC0-infinity)) and 103.37%-112.46% (C(max)). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated since for both parameters AUC and C(max) the 90% confidence intervals of the T/R ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of two digoxin formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability/bioequivalence of two formulations of digoxin (CAS 20830-75-5) were assessed in this paper. The study was conducted in 20 healthy Chinese male volunteers according to an open, randomized, single-blind, 2-way crossover study design with a wash-out phase of 14 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 72 h post-dose and digoxin plasma concentrations were determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LCMS/MS) method. Based on the plasma concentration-time data of each individual during two periods, pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity and t1/2, were calculated by applying noncompartmental analysis. Pharmacokinetic data for test and reference formulations were analyzed statistically to evaluate bioequivalence of the two formulations. After oral administration, the values of Cmax Tmax, t1/2, AUC0-tau, AUC0-infinity for test and reference formulations were 2.61 +/- 0.98 and 2.68 +/- 1.09 ng/ mL, 1.0 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 h, 27.94 +/- 3.14 and 27.56 +/- 3.86 h, 28.57 +/- 4.99 and 28.77 +/- 6.53 ng x h/mL, 33.44 +/- 4.85 and 33.63 +/- 7.57 ng x h/mL, respectively. Both primary target parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau, were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Relative bioavailabilities were 102.5 +/- 19.2% for AUC0-infinity, 102.0 +/- 19.3% for AUC0-tau. Bioequivalence between test and reference formulations was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC0-infinity and AUC0-tau. The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%, which means that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of digoxin.     

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of clindamycin hydrochloride formulations after single-dose administration in healthy Chinese male volunteers

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability of clindamycin (CAS 18323-44-9) from three clindamycin hydrochloride (CAS 21 462-39-5) capsules (clindamycin 75 mg capsule as test 1 preparation, 150 mg capsule as test 2 preparation and a commercially available original 150 mg capsule of the drug as reference preparation) in 24 Chinese healthy male volunteers, aged between 22 and 28. The study was conducted according to a randomized, double-blind, 3-period, 3-treatment, 3-sequence, single-dose, crossover design with a wash-out phase of 7 days. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic profiling were taken up to 14 h post-dose, and clindamycin plasma concentrations were determined with a validated liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (LC-ESI-MS) method. Maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)) of 3.06 +/- 1.10 microg/mL (test 1), 3.10 +/- 1.59 microg/mL (test 2) and 3.06 +/- 1.15 microg/mL (reference) were achieved. Areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC(0-infinity)) of 10.73 +/- 4.29 microg x h/mL (test 1), 10.54 +/- 4.10 microg x h/ mL (test 2) and 11.29 +/- 4.98 microg x h/mL (reference), AUC(0-t) of 10.32 +/- 4.09 microg x h/ mL, 10.26 +/- 3.96 microg x h/mL, 10.94 +/- 4.86 g x h/mL were calculated. The median T(max) was 0.80 +/- 0.52 h, 0.77 +/- 0.37 h, 1.01 +/- 0.6 h for test 1, test 2 and reference formulation, respectively. Plasma elimination half-lives (t1/2) of 2.72 +/- 0.58 h (test 1), 2.39 +/- 0.37 h (test 2) and 2.63 +/- 0.66 h (reference) were determined. Both primary target parameters, AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(0-t) were tested parametrically by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and relative bioavailabilities were 98.0 +/- 16.2% (test 1) and 97.2 +/- 20.3% (test 2) for AUC(0-infinity), 97.5 +/- 16.3% (test 1) and 97.8 +/- 20.2% (test 2) for AUC(0-t). Bioequivalence between test and reference preparation was demonstrated for both parameters, AUC(0-infinity) and AUC(0-t). The 90% confidence intervals of the T/R-ratios of logarithmically transformed data were in the generally accepted range of 80%-125%. That means that the two test formulations are bioequivalent to the reference formulation for clindamycin.     

Pharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of two terbinafine hydrochloride formulations after single-dose administration in Chinese healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new terbinafine (CAS 91161-71-6) preparation was compared with a commercially available original preparation (reference) of the drug in 19 Chinese healthy male volunteers. The study was performed in an open, randomized, single blind two-sequence, two-period crossover design. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 250 mg terbinafine as a test or reference formulation with a 7-day washout period between the two preparations. The plasma concentrations of terbinafine were analyzed by a sensitive liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC(0-t) AUC(0-infinity), C(max), t1/2, and T(max). The values of AUC(0-t) demonstrated nearly identical bioavailability of terbinafine from the examined formulations. The AUC(0.48) of terbinafine was 5982.85 +/- 2449.17 and 6761.63 +/- 3140.33 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of terbinafine was 1656.25 +/- 623.18 ng/ml for the test and 1552.07 +/- 660.35 ng/ml for the reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve for terbinafine. The 90% confidence limits calculated for C(max) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of terbinafine were within the bioequivalence range (80%-125% for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of terbinafine.     

Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic study of two trimetazidine modified release formulations in healthy Bangladeshi male volunteers

Trimetazidine (CAS 5011-34-7) is an effective and well-tolerated antianginal drug that possesses protective properties against ischemia-induced heart injury. The relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic characteristics of two modified release formulations of 35 mg trimetazidine, one as the test product (Metacard MR) and one as the reference product, were compared in healthy Bangladeshi male volunteers. The randomized, two-way crossover study was conducted in 24 healthy male volunteers after administration of a single 35 mg dose of each modified release formulation after 12-h overnight fasting, with a washout period of two weeks. Blood samples were collected at various time intervals following oral administration and analyzed for trimetazidine concentrations using a validated HPLC method. The pharmacokinetic parameters were determined by a non-compartmental method. After administering a single dose of 35 mg of each trimetazidine formulation, the obtained mean (SD) values for the test and reference products were 104.78 (29.3) and 98.57 (28.7) ng/ml for Cmax; 4.00 (1.1) and 3.54 (1.32) h for t(max); 423.81 (173.9) and 410.01 (195.87) ng x h/ml for AUC0-12; and 472.51 (195.2) and 462.78 (225.13) ng x h/ml for AUC0-infinity respectively. The mean t1/2 was found 3.69 (1.1) h and 3.45 (0.72) h for test and reference products respectively. From paired t-test, no significant differences were observed (p > 0.05) for any pharmacokinetic parameters. The 90% confidence intervals of the test/reference mean ratios of the In-transformed AUC0-12, AUC0-infinity, and Cmax mean values were 106.19% (97.16%-116.06%), 104.74% (95.04%-115.42%) and 106.30% (95.23%-118.66%), respectively. The two formulations demonstrated similar bioavailability with respect to both the rate and extent of trimetazidine absorption.     

Comparative bioavailability study of doxycycline hyclate (equivalent to 100 mg doxycycline) capsules (doxycin vs vibramycin) for bioequivalence evaluation in healthy adult volunteers

This investigation was carried out to evaluate the bioavailability of a new capsule formulation of doxycycline (100 mg), doxycin, relative to the reference product, vibramycin (100 mg) capsules. The bioavailability was carried out in 24 healthy male volunteers who received a single dose (100 mg) of the test (A) and the reference (B) products after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours on 2 treatment days. The treatment periods were separated by a 2-week washout period. A randomized, balanced 2-way cross-over design was used. After dosing, serial blood samples were collected for a period of 48 hours. Plasma concentrations of doxycycline were analyzed by a sensitive and validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay. The pharmacokinetic parameters for doxycycline were determined using standard noncompartmental methods. The parameters AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, K(el), t(1/2) and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were analyzed statistically using log-transformed data. The time to maximum concentration (tmax) was analyzed using raw data. The parametric 90% confidence intervals of the mean values of the pharmacokinetic parameters: AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were within the range 80-125% which is acceptable for bioequivalence (using log-transformed data). The calculated 90% confidence intervals based on the ANOVA analysis of the mean test/reference ratios of AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) were 95.98-109.56%, 92.21 to 107.66%, 93.90-112.56%, and 96.0 to 106.91% respectively. The test formulation was found bioequivalent to the reference formulation with regard to AUC(0-t), AUC(0-infinity), Cmax and Cmax/AUC(0-infinity) by the Schuirmann's two 1-sided t-tests. Therefore, the 2 formulations were considered to be bioequivalent.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two preparations of letrozole in healthy subjects

The bioavailability of a new letrozole (CAS 112809-51-5) preparation was compared with the reference preparation of the drug in 25 healthy volunteers, aged between 18 and 33. A single dose of 2.5 mg was given orally in the fasted state, using a randomized two-way, cross-over protocol. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Blood samples were obtained at regular time intervals, until 312 h after drug administration. After solid phase extraction (SPE) letrozole plasma levels were measured by high pressure liquid chromatography that was validated before the start of the study (UV detector, fluoroletrozole as an internal standard). The limit of quantification was 1.4 nmol/ml. The following pharmacokinetics parameters were calculated from letrozole plasma concentrations: AUC(0-infinity), AUC(0-t), Cmax, tmax, F(rel), MRT, t(1/2), k(el). The confidence intervals for the statistical calculations of AUC(0-infinity), Cmax, tmax were 95 % and AUC(0-t), MRT, t(1/2), k(el) were tested by means of the unpaired t-tests procedure and after logarithmic transformation for overall significant differences using analysis of variance--three-way ANOVA. The AUC(0-infinity) ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 99.52 %, and 94.05-107.31%, respectively. The Cmax ratio test/reference and the 90 % confidence interval were 89.18 %, and 84.48-98.60%, respectively. AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios (90 % CI) were within the 80-125 % interval required for bioequivalence as stipulated in the current international regulations of the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products and the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is concluded that the new letrozole preparation is therapeutically equivalent to the reference preparation for both the extent and the rate of absorption after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.     

Comparative bioavailability study of two ibuprofen preparations after oral administration in healthy volunteers

The bioavailability of a new ibuprofen (2-(p-isobutylphenyl)propionic acid, CAS 15687-27-1) preparation was compared with a reference preparation of the drug in 23 healthy male volunteers, aged between 19 and 27. A single dose of 400 mg was given orally in the fasted state, using a randomized two-way crossover study. A washout period of two weeks separated both treatment periods. Ibuprofen plasma levels were determined by means of a validated HPLC method (UV detector). Values of 154.48 +/- 53.27 microg x h/ml (95 % confidence interval CI: 133.50-177.03) for the test, and 140.86 +/- 44.82 microg x h/ml (95% CI: 122.53-159.16) for the reference preparation AUC(0-infinity) demonstrate a nearly identical extent of drug absorption. Maximum plasma concentrations Cmax of 39.53 +/- 7.11 microg/ml (95 % CI: 35.97-41.78) and 37.71 +/- 8.67 microg/ml (95% CI: 33.37-40.46) achieved for the test and reference preparations did not differ significantly. AUC(0-infinity) and Cmax ratios (90% CI) were within the 80-125% interval required for bioequivalence as stipulated in the current international regulations of the European Agency for the Evalution of Medicinal Products and the Food and Drug Administration. Therefore it is concluded that the new ibuprofen preparation is therapeutically equivalent to the reference preparation for both, the extent and the rate of absorption, after single dose administration in healthy volunteers.