Alternating Wenckebach periodicity: A common electrophysiologic response.

Alternating Wenckebach periods are defined as episodes of 2:1 atrioventricular (A-V) block in which conducted P-R intervals progressively prolong, terminating in two or three blocked P waves. In this study, His bundle recordings were obtained in 13 patients with pacing-induced alternating Wenckebach periods. Three patterns were noted: Pattern 1 (one patient with a narrow QRS complex) was characterized by 2:1 block distal to the H deflection (block in the His bundle) and Wenckebach periods proximal to the H deflection, terminating with two blocked P waves. Pattern 2 (four patients) was characterized by alternating Wenckebach periods proximal to the His bundle, terminating with three blocked P waves. Pattern 3 (eight patients) was characterized by alternating Wenckebach periods proximal to the His bundle, terminating with two blocked P waves. Alternating Wenckebach periods are best explained by postulating two levels of block. When alternating Wenckebach periods are terminated by three blocked P waves (pattern 2), the condition may be explained by postulating 2:1 block (proximal level) and type I block (distal level). When alternating Wenckebach periods are terminated by two blocked P waves (patterns 1 and 3), the condition may be explained by postulating type I block (proximal level) and 2:1 block (distal level). Pattern 1 reflects block at two levels, the A-V node and His bundle. Patterns 2 and 3 most likely reflect horizontal dissociation within the A-V node.     

Alternative mechanisms of apparent supernormal atrioventricular conduction

Alternative mechanisms were found to explain several different electrocardiographic examples of apparent supernormal atrioventricular (A-V) conduction in man using programmed premature atrial and ventricular stimulation and His bundle recordings. Sudden shortening of the P-R interval during A-V nodal Wenckebach phenomenon was due to manifest or concealed reentry within the A-V node. Gap phenomena in which late atrial premature depolarizations blocked while earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted were shown to result from delay of earlier atrial premature depolarizations in the A-V node (type I gap) or in the His-Purkinje system (type II gap). Mechanisms analogous to the latter were found in cases of apparent supernormality of intraventricular conduction: Late atrial premature depolarizations resulted in aberration whereas earlier atrial premature depolarizations conducted normally because of delay within the A-V node or His-Purkinje system. Unexpected normalization of a bundle branch block pattern also resulted from Wenckebach phenomenon in the bundle branches. Atypical Wenckebach phenomenon with the first beat of the period demonstrated that aberration was due to phase 4 depolarization. Preexcitation of the ventricle before the delivery of a previously blocked atrial premature depolarization allowed conduction through the area of block (A-V node) because of earlier depolarization of the latter with earlier recovery. In the His-Purkinje system, 2:1 A-V block was converted to 1:1 conduction when a premature ventricular depolarization shortened the refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system.     

Recent Insights into Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia– An Integrated Approach to Diagnosis and Therapy

Summary: Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia may result from re-entrance in the AV node, the norma/ A-V pathway with an accessory AV connection, in the sino-atrial node, in the atria, or else reflect ectopic impulse formation in a spontaneously automatic supraventricular focus. Electrocardiographic criteria which are helpful in differentiating these mechanisms involve an analysis of cycle length, changes in cycle length with intermittent bundle branch block, P wave morphology and the relationship of P wave to QRS complex, P-R interval, the presence of A-V block during tachycardia and the influence of autonomic tone on the tachycardia. Electrophysiologic studies further elucidate mechanism by demonstrating the mode of induction and termination of the tachycardia, the characteristics of antegrade and retrograde A-V conduction curves and refractory periods, atrial activation sequence of echo beats and the influence of premature beats introduced during tachycardia. These features are summarised in Table 1. Therapy can be accurately planned according to the results of experimental administration of antiarrhythmic agents and of pacing sequences upon induction and termination of tachycardia in the catheterisation laboratory.     

His bundle electrocardiography in digitalis-induced "atrioventricular junctional" Wenckebach periods with irregular H-H intervals.

His bundle electrograms were recorded during catheter insertion for prophylactic demand pacing in two patients with accelerated or nonaccelerated "atrioventricular (A-V) junctional" rhythms associated with A-V junctional Wenckebach periods. This appears to be the first published report of so-called A-V junctional Wenckebach periods in which the characteristic irregularities of the H-H intervals were recorded. Patient 1 had an additional area of "complete" anterograde A-V nodal (A-H) block. In Patient 2 the rate of impulse formation was consistent with nonparoxysmal A-V junctional tachycardia. The His bundle recordings were obtained in patients with digitalis toxicity and should be interpreted in the context. The integration of clinical and intracardiac findings with extrapolations from microelectrode and pharmacolic studies and with deductions from the clinical electrocardiograms suggests that the conduction disturbances probably occurred within the A-V node itself (in its AN region). This hypothesis implies that automaticity also originated in the A-V node because the site of impulse formation must have been proximal to the site of the Wenckebach periods. However, conclusive proof of of these postulates will require further studies with refined techniques.     

Atrial tachycardia without P waves masquerading as an A-V junctional tachycardia.

Two patients who presented by scalar ECG with an A-V junctional tachycardia were demonstrated during an electrophysiologic evaluation to have an atrial tachycardia without P waves in the surface ECG. Case 1 had an atrial tachycardia that conducted through the A-V node with a Wenckebach block. Atrial activity was recorded only from the proximal portion of the coronary sinus and from right atrial areas near the tricuspid valve. Case 2 had an atrial tachycardia that abruptly began and terminated following carotid sinus massage. Atrial activity was recorded only in the coronary sinusos, and pacing at that site resulted in atrial capture, with Wenckebach conduction to the ventricles. These observations demonstrate that an atrial tachycardia without P waves can simulate A-V junctional tachycardia with or without Weckebach block. Such findings may have a bearing on some important electrophysiologic concepts such as the origin of A-V junctional rhythms and the need for atrial participation in A-V nodal re-entry.     

Atrial response during ventricular fibrillation

Electrical activity of the bundle of His and atria were recorded during sinus rhythm and electrically induced ventricular fibrillation in 23 dogs. Multiple bipolar atrial electrograms obtained from several sites within the right and left atria permitted the determination of the frequency, regularity, and sequence of atrial activation (i.e., sinus or retrograde) during ventricular fibrillation. Prior to the induction of ventricular fibrillation, the capacity to retrogradely conduct across the A-V node was tested in each animal by pacing the right ventricle at various cycle lengths. Fourteen animals demonstrated consistent 1:1 retrograde conduction at various paced cycle lengths (Group A); in four animals (Group B) retrograde conduction was intermittent and in three animals (Group C) no retrograde conduction was observed at any paced cycle length. Ventriculo-atrial conduction was also absent in two animals (Group D) with antegrade A-V block within the His-Purkinje system.The most common conduction pattern noted at the onset of ventricular fibrillation was that of rapid, irregular, retrograde activation of both the bundle of His and atria. However, the frequency of retrograde activation of the atria was less than that of the bundle of His indicating that the A-V node was a site of retrograde concealment of impulses. This conduction pattern was noted in all animals of Groups A and B. In all animals of Groups C and D, the atria continued to be activated in a sinus sequence during ventricular fibrillation. In Group C animals, the A-V node was the site of both antegrade and retrograde concealment. In the two animals with A-V block (Group D), the site of retrograde concealment was distal to the site of block.In six studies, retrograde A-V nodal Wenckebach cycles with and without re-entry were observed for varying periods of time.Less often, the irregular atrial responses during ventricular fibrillation were accounted for by short periods of sinus capture interspersed with periods of retrograde capture.During ventricular fibrillation, retrograde conduction across the A-V node could be abolished by vagal stimulation.The results of this study indicate that retrograde concealed conduction within the A-V node is the major determinant of an irregular atrial response during ventricular fibrillation just as antegrade concealed conduction is the major determinant of an irregular ventricular response during atrial fibrillation.     

Influence of pacemaker-induced tachycardia with A-V block on left ventricular blood velocity in man.

Phasic instantaneous left ventricular blood velocity was measured by radiotelemetry in 28 subjects with a Doppler ultrasonic flowmeter catheter during atrial pacing and induced A-V block Type I Wenckebach A-V block with conduction ratios of 9:8 or lower generally produced a stepwise reduction of peak left ventricular blood velocity in relation to shortened R-R intervals. Longer Wenckebach periods resulted in little or no blood velocity alteration during 1:1 A-V conduction. Those beats following a blocked atrial depolarization were associated with augmented blood velocities. In three subjects, bigeminal periods of 3:2 A-V block resulted in larger left ventricular blood velocities when compared with 2:1 A-V block, despite identical R-R intervals following the blocked P wave. This latter phenomenon was attributed to diastolic augmentation of left ventricular contraction following the second and hemodynamically ineffective beat during 3:2 A-V block. Three patients manifested true blood velocity alternation during second-degree A-V block and changing R-R intervals. The variations in peak left ventricular blood velocity observed during atrial pacing and A-V block are related to changing inotropic state and cycle length dependent alterations of left ventricular diastolic filling.     

Electrocardiographic manifestations and clinical significance of atrioventricular nodal alternating Wenckbach periods

Atrioventricular nodal alternating Wenckebach periods were defined as episodes of 2:1 atrioventricular block in which there was a gradual increase in transmission intervals of conducted beats ending in two or three consecutively blocked atrial impulses. This is one of the mechanisms whereby 2:1 atrioventricular block progresses into 3:1 or 4:1 atrioventricular block. Alternating Wenckebach periods appear during rapid atrial pac,ng (even in the absence of depressed atrioventricular nodal function), provided that the atria can be captured at a rate fast enough to allow for the occurrence of this phenomenon. Treatment of atrial flutter with digoxin and quinidine produces alternating Wenckebach's periods, with associated electrocardiographic changes specific for the type of drug given. In patients with "atrial tachycardia with atrioventricular block" due to digitalis intoxication or with primary disease of the conducting system or with acute myocardial infarction, there are coexisting severe arrhythmias and clinical symptoms requiring almost immediate pharmacologic or electrical therapy. We conclude that atrioventricular nodal alternating Wenckebach's periods are common and frequentyly transient and that they occur in a variety of clinical conditions, most of which are benign; however, contrary to what is commonly accepted, some episodes appear in clinical settings requiring prompt pharmacologic or electrical treatment.     

Coexisting intra- and subnodal block: an unusual abnormality of atrioventricular conduction

The presence of A-V block occurring at two levels of the conducting system was demonstrated in an asymptomatic patient by means of the His bundle recordings. During sinus rhythm, first degree A-V block with complete left bundle branch block was noted, suggesting the presence of bilateral bundle branch block. His bundle recordings demonstrated the coexistence of intranodal (Wenckebach periods, Mobitz Type I) and subnodal (Mobitz Type II) block. The evidence of block below the proximal His bundle offered confirmatory evidence of bilateral bundle branch block. In spite of the abnormal antegrade conduction, there was 1:1 V-A conduction during right ventricular pacing at 110 per minute. With more rapid (130 per minute) ventricular pacing, retrograde Wenckebach periods were observed, suggesting that there was, in addition, possible impairment in retrograde conduction. This report serves to demonstrate (1) the limitations of the body surface ECG in the assessment of A-V conduction and (2) that His bundle electrograms make it possible to detect the presence of coincidental lesions at two levels of the A-V conducting system.     

Wenckebach periods associated with high grade second degree (2 : 1 and 3 : 1) A-V block.

An electrocardiogram (ECG) of bilateral bundle branch block (BBBB) which may be attributable to a mixture of 2 : 1 and 3 : 1 atrioventricular (A-V) block is described. The irregularity of QRS complexes with left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern during 2 : 1 A-V block may be ascribable to "Wenckebach periods", which might be due either to A-V nodal or His bundle or bundle branch delay. However, it was impossible to distinguish between them precisely because appropriate His bundle studies were not performed during the active arrhythmic phase. Although the exact mechanism involved were not established with certainty, different rates of recovery in conduction in the bundle branches in association with a marked prolongation of the refractoriness would seem to be the unique feature of this complex arrhythmia. An ECG tracing of BBBB indicating high grade second degree (2 : 1 and 3 : 1) A-V block, in which "spontaneous" occurrence of "Wenckebach periods" with 2 consecutive blocked P waves can be observed during 2 : 1 A-V block, has never been reported previously as far as can be ascertained from published records.     

Alternating right and left bundle branch block aberration during atrial tachycardia

In a patient with atrial tachycardia with a rate of 200 per minute, the A-V conduction ratio was at times 2:1, but often it was 4:3 or 3:2 with progressive P-R interval prolongation (Wenckebach mechanism, an expression of presumable A-V nodal block). In each episode of 4:3 conduction, the first QRS complex was narrow, and the 2 ensuing beats were wide due to aberrant conduction. Aberration did not occur with a constant configuration, but in consecutive episodes of 4:3 conduction ratio there was a regular alternation of left bundle branch block and right bundle branch block. The pattern was explained by concealed retrograde conduction into the anterogradely blocked bundle branch. This caused 2 distinct effects: (1) shifting “to the right” of the refractory period of the affected bundle branch, resulting in maintenance of aberration with the same configuration, if consecutive atrial impulses were conducted to the ventricles, and (2) shortening of the effective cycle of the affected bundle branch, resulting in aberration due to block of the controlateral bundle branch, whenever a pause occasioned by a nonconducted atrial impulse was followed by restoration of 1:1 conduction for 2 or more consecutive beats.     

Paroxysmal tachycardia with atrioventricular dissociation in a patient with a variant of pre-excitation syndrome

We report a patient with a variant of the pre-excitation syndrome who has paroxysmal tachycardia with a pattern of left bundle branch block and ventriculo-atrial dissociation. The tachycardia is precipitated by exercise, reproduced by atrial pacing and terminated with lidocaine. Between attacks the electrocardiogram revealed prominent R waves in right precordial leads and the vectorcardiogram displayed anterior displacement of the mean QRS vector, but neither was diagnostic of pre-excitation. The resting P-R interval (140 msec) and A-H interval (60 msec) were within normal limits, but the H-V interval (30 msec) was at or slightly below normal limits. Increasing heart rate from 80 to 150/min with atrial pacing increased A-H from 70 to 160 msec, but did not change the H-V interval. With pacing at 160/min, A-H lengthened progressively from 160 to 190 msec, but A-V remained constant at the critical limit of 190 msec. Accordingly, the H-V interval decreased until the His spike disappeared into the QRS or did not occur because of A-V block. At this point, the QRS complex changed to that seen during spontaneous tachycardia. Pacing was stopped, but tachycardia continued at 160/min and ventriculoatrial dissociation appeared. Lidocaine promptly restored sinus rhythm. We speculate that the patient has anomalous conduction between the lower segment of the A-V node and the ventricular septum (Mahaim fibers) and a reciprocating tachycardia which results from antegrade conduction down the anomalous pathway and retrograde conduction up the His-Purkinje system and lower A-V node. Ventriculo-atrial Wenckebach during the tachycardia excludes participation of atria and upper part of the A-V node in the re-entrant tachycardia. This variant of pre-excitation syndrome could easily be mistaken for “true ventricular tachycardia” and serious heart disease.     

Termination of circus movement tachycardia utilizing an accessory atrioventricular pathway by retrograde concealed penetration of the atrioventricular node through the bundle branch system: A mechanism of tachycardia termination in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

A 30 year old woman with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome underwent electrophysiologic study for investigation of circus movement tachycardia utilizing the accessory pathway for retrograde conduction. The accessory pathway was located on the right side. Episodes of circus movement tachycardia with left and right bundle branch block were induced. Some episodes of circus movement tachycardia with left bundle branch block terminated spontaneously. Two episodes of spontaneous termination at the level of the atrioventricular (A-V) node were preceded by prolongation of the H-V interval causing delay in atrial activation. This delayed atrial cycle was then followed paradoxically by spontaneous termination of the tachycardia in the A-V node. A similar phenomenon could be demonstrated reproducibly with single echo beats induced by coronary sinus extrastimuli. It appears that retrograde concealed penetration of the A-V node through the bundle branch system during anterograde left bundle branch block is the most likely mechanism for this phenomenon.     

Concealed intraventricular conduction in the His bundle electrogram.

Multiple areas of concealed intraventricular conduction are deduced on the basis of aftereffects observed in His bundle recordings. Electrocardiograms and His bundle recordings are presented from two patients with unstable bilateral bundle branch block, the instability of which depended on the interval at which ventricular depolarization was initiated by sinus or paced impulses. This circumstance allows postulation of 1) concealed transseptal retrograde penetration of the left bundle branch system; 2) concealed transseptal retrograde penetration of the right bundle branch system; 3) alternate beat Wenckebach phenomenon with two areas of block in the bundle branch system with concealed penetration of the proximal area; 4) concealed re-entry in the right bundle branch system during an H-V Wenckebach cycle with resetting of the sequence of 2:1 H-V block and return of the re-entry wave to the A-V node causing subsequent A-H block; 5) proximal 2:1 block and distal Wenckebach block producing only two consecutively blocked beats; and 6) infrahisian Wenckebach block with changes both in A-V conduction and QRS contour.     

Wenckebach periods with repetitive block: evaluation with His bundle recording

Two patients are reported in whom repetitive block of two consecutive P waves occurred during Wenckebach beating induced by atrial pacing. His bundle recordings revealed block proximal to H in the first case, suggesting inhomogeneous conduction in the A-V node. In the second case, long cycle lengths were produced in the His-Purkinje system due to A-V nodal Wenckebach periods. The long cycles prolonged refractory periods in the His Purkinje system so that subsequent beats (short cycles) were blocked distal to H.The repetitive block of consecutive multiple atrial impulses could result in unexpected degrees of ventricular asystole during usually benign Type I second-degree A-V block.     

Direct and imcomplete concealed Wenckebach phenomena in the left bundle-branch system.

A case is reported showing a tachycardia dependent Wenckebach phenomenon in both the A-V node and the left bundle branch system. Pacing from the His bundle region induced manifest (direct) and imcompletely concealed (indirect) types of Wenckebach phenomenon within the left bundle branch system.     

Negative retrograde P wave in D1, sign of left postero-lateral Kent bundle]

A negative P wave in D1 with a mean atrial vector which is horizontal or descending in the frontal plane, occurring during paroxysmal tachycardial due to reciprocal rhythm or after ventricular stimulation suggests atrial depolarisation which starts in the left auricle at some distance from the A-V node and near the pulmonary veins. In the absence of an external anterograde ventricular pre-excitation, such P waves may indicate the presence of a hidden bundle of Kent posterolaterally on the left, allowing retrograde conduction during the tachycardia by a reciprocal rhythm.     

Re-entry due to manifest and concealed. His bundle ectopic systoles. Report of a case.

Concealed (C) His bundle ectopic systoles (H') have been shown in man to give rise to first and second degree atrioventricular (A-V) block and to simulate nonconducted atrial premature beats (P'). This report outlines a hitherto undescribed electrophysiologic consequence of H' in a 69-year-old man with arteriosclerotic heart disease and a Wenckebach type second degree A-V block in the His-Purkinje system. During a His bundle study, H' were shown to conduct either to the atria and ventricles with varying relationships to P' and QRS, or to conduct only to the atria, simulating nonconducted P' or atrial fusion beats. Both types of H' could initiate a re-entrant arrhythmia during retrograde conduction. Of particular interest are late coupled H' that failed to conduct to the ventricles and also failed to activate the atria because of prior capture by the sinus impulse (CH'). These CH' could also initiate re-entry by conducting retrogradely to engage the subatrial re-entry circuit. Evidence is presented to suggest re-entry occurs by way of a retrograde concealed accessory pathway and antegrade conduction in the atrioventricular node.     

Exposure of concealed right bundle branch block in Wolff-Parkinson-White type B by pacing from the vicinity of the A-V node.

In two infants with Wolff-Parkinson-White type B, right bundle branch block was concealed during sinus rhythm and pacing from close to the atrial entrance of the right-sided accessory pathway. However, pacing from the vicinity of the A-V node, the A-V node itself, and the His bundle exposed the right bundle branch block by producing exclusive ventricular activation through the normal, A-V nodal His-Purkinje pathway. In addition, pacing from close to the A-V node also resulted in fusion beats characterized by absence of delta waves with (pseudo) normal QRS complexes and short H-V intervals. False patterns of tachycardia-dependent and bradycardia-dependent block in the accessory pathway also occurred. These dynamic phenomena were attributed to the (peri-A-V nodal) pacing-related, relatively early arrival of excitation at the ventricles through the normal pathways coexisting with delayed arrival of excitation via the accessory pathway. The latter in turn was due to the longer intra-atrial conduction time from paced (peri-A-V nodal) site to atrial entrance of the accessory pathway.     

Rate related block in the canine His-Purkinje system after ligation of the anterior septal artery--observation by His bundle electrocardiography.

In order to investigate the pathophysiology of tachycardia and bradycardia dependent block in the His-Purkinje system, anterior septal artery was ligated and the effects of vagal stimulation and atrial pacing were serially checked in 26 dogs. Tachycardia dependent intra-His bundle block or H-V blocks developed in all cases following ligation of the anterior septal artery and bradycardia dependent block ensued in 3 cases. The latter appeared only in the form of split His bundle or lengthening of the H-V intervals. Spontaneous second or third degree AV block appeared thereafter. Bundle branch block appeared in 19 cases after ligation of the artery. Rate dependent bundle branch block was observed before the development of stable bundle branch block. Frequently, a very long pause was necessary to produce bradycardia dependent block. On the other hand, bradycardia dependent H-V blocks by vagal stimulation were not necessarily dependent upon cardiac cycle length alone. Tachycardia dependent paroxysmal A-V blocks were induced in 7 cases by atrial pacing, soon before or after the onset of spontaneous second degree A-V block. In addition, this block was induced in the very early phase after ligation of the artery in one case. This repetitive intra-His bundle block or H-V block was induced not only by progressive increase in pacing rate but also by gradual decrease in pacing rate after a Wenckebach type of second degree A-H block.