A concurrent ultra‐fractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide treatment: A promising therapy for newly diagnosed,inoperable glioblastoma

We report on a phase II clinical trial to determine the effect of a concurrent ultra‐fractionated radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment in inoperable glioblastoma patients. A phase II study opened; patients over 18 years of age who were able to give informed consent and had histologically proven, newly diagnosed inoperable diagnosed and supratentorial glioblastoma were eligible. Three doses of 0.75 Gy spaced apart by at least 4 hr were delivered daily, 5 days a week for six consecutive weeks for a total of 67.5 Gy. Chemotherapy was administered during the same period, which consisted of temozolomide given at a dose of 75 mg/m² for 7 days a week. After a 4‐week break, chemotherapy was resumed for up to six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide treatment, given every 28 days, according to the standard 5‐day regimen. Tolerance and toxicity were the primary endpoints; survival and progression‐free survival were the secondary endpoints. In total, 40 patients were enrolled in this study, 29 men and 11 women. The median age was 58 years, and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80. The concomitant ultra‐fractionated radiotherapy and temozolomide treatment was well tolerated. Complete responses were seen in four patients, and partial responses were reported in seven patients. The median survival from the initial diagnosis was 16 months. Several long‐term survivors were noted. Concurrent ultra‐fractionated radiation therapy and temozolomide treatment are well accepted by the patients. The results showed encouraging survival rates for these unfavorable patients.     

Pulsed radiation therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BackgroundPulsed radiation therapy (PRT) has shown effective tumor control and superior normal-tissue sparing ability compared with standard radiotherapy (SRT) in preclinical models and retrospective clinical series. This is the first prospective trial to investigate PRT in the treatment of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).MethodsThis is a single-arm, prospective study. Patients with newly diagnosed GBM underwent surgery, followed by 60 Gy of PRT with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). Each day, a 2-Gy fraction was divided into ten 0.2-Gy pulses, separated by 3-minute intervals. Patients received maintenance TMZ. Neurocognitive function (NCF) and quality of life (QoL) were monitored for 2 years using the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test‒Revised and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 QoL questionnaire. Change in NCF was evaluated based on a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold of 0.5 standard deviation.ResultsTwenty patients were enrolled with a median follow-up of 21 months. Median age was 60 years. Forty percent underwent subtotal resection, and 60% underwent gross total resection. One patient had an isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutated tumor. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 10.7 and 20.9 months, respectively. In a post-hoc comparison, median OS for the prospective cohort was longer, compared with a matched cohort receiving SRT (20.9 vs 14 mo, P = 0.042). There was no decline in QoL, and changes in NCF scores did not meet the threshold of an MCID.ConclusionsTreatment of newly diagnosed GBM with PRT is feasible and produces promising effectiveness while maintaining neurocognitive function and QoL. Validation of our results in a larger prospective trial warrants consideration.     

High-dose-rate stereotactic brachytherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiformes

Purpose: To evaluate high-dose-rate (HDR) stereotactic brachytherapy (STBT) for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Materials and methods: Between August 1994 and December 1998, 28 patients with newly diagnosed GBM underwent surgery, external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and HDR STBT. STBT eligibility criteria included unifocal lesions, residual tumor <6cm in maximum diameter, supratentorial lesions, tumors not crossing the midline, tumors without subependymal spread and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) >60. STBT was delivered over five consecutive days with two fractions per day for a total median dose of 30Gy. Twenty-eight STBT eligible GBM patients treated with surgery and EBRT only over the same period were matched controls. Results: Median survival times for the STBT group and controls were 19.5 versus 12.5 months; one and two year survival rates were 89% versus 42% and 61% versus 28%, respectively (p=0.12). Using multivariate analysis, age, KPS and HDR STBT were significant factors predicting survival. By RPA class, 2-year survival rates for STBT and controls were: III – 78% versus 50%; IV – 40% versus 0%; V – 21% versus 15%, respectively. Corresponding median survival times in months were: 41.6 versus 21.2 (p = 0.39); 16.7 versus 12.1 (p = 0.36); 18.7 versus 10.6 (p = 0.02). No major complications were found in the STBT arm. Conclusions: Because of small patient numbers, median survival time increases were only statistically significant in the RPA Class V patients, but a strong survival time trend emerged favoring patients undergoing HDR STBT. Further prospective study is warranted to fully assess the merits of this technique for GBM management.     

Phase II and pharmacogenomics study of enzastaurin plus temozolomide during and following radiation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme and gliosarcoma

This open-label, single-arm, phase II study combined enzastaurin with temozolomide plus radiation therapy (RT) to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and gliosarcoma. Adults with newly diagnosed disease and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 60 were enrolled. Treatment was started within 5 weeks after surgical diagnosis. RT consisted of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. Temozolomide was given at 75 mg/m(2) daily during RT and then adjuvantly at 200 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days, followed by a 23-day break. Enzastaurin was given once daily during RT and in the adjuvant period at 250 mg/day. Cycles were 28 days. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and correlations between efficacy and molecular markers analyzed from tumor tissue samples were also evaluated. A prospectively planned analysis compared OS and PFS of the current trial with outcomes from 3 historical phase II trials that combined novel agents with temozolomide plus RT in patients with GBM or gliosarcoma. Sixty-six patients were enrolled. The treatment regimen was well tolerated. OS (median, 74 weeks) and PFS (median, 36 weeks) results from the current trial were comparable to those from a prior phase II study using erlotinib and were significantly better than those from 2 other previous studies that used thalidomide or cis-retinoic acid, all in combination with temozolomide plus RT. A positive correlation between O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation and OS was observed. Adjusting for age and KPS, no other biomarker was associated with survival outcome. Correlation of relevant biomarkers with OS may be useful in future trials.     

Temozolomide in combination with BCNU before and after radiotherapy in patients with inoperable newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of carmustine (BCNU) in combination with temozolomide as first-line chemotherapy before and after radiotherapy (RT) in patients with inoperable, newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients were treated with BCNU (150 mg/m2) on day 1 and temozolomide (110 mg/m2/day) on days 1 through 5 of each 42-day cycle for up to four cycles prior to conventional RT (2 Gy fractions to a total of 60 Gy). After RT, BCNU + temozolomide was administered for four additional cycles or until progression. The primary end point was response rate; secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS); overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: Sixty per cent of patients completed four cycles of neo-adjuvant BCNU + temozolomide. Objective response rate (intention-to-treat) was 42.5% (95% confidence interval 27% to 58%), including two (5%) complete and 15 (37.5%) partial responses. In the eligible population (n=37) the objective response rate was 46%. Nine (24%) patients had stable disease and 14 (35%) had progressive disease. Median PFS and OS were 7.4 and 12.7 months, respectively. Age was the only significant prognostic factor and tumor location (lobar versus multifocal versus corpus callosum) showed a trend. Grade 3-4 toxicities included thrombocytopenia (n=11) and neutropenia (n=7) for both pre- and post-RT chemotherapy. Four patients required platelet transfusions. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of BCNU plus temozolomide as neo-adjuvant therapy in inoperable GBM exhibited promising activity with a good safety profile and warrants further evaluation.     

Potential new gene therapy option with sitimagene ceradenovec for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is associated with a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%, making GBM one of the most aggressive neoplastic malignancies. However significant strides have been made over the past few years with respect to understanding the pathophysiology as well as treatment modalities. The use of local therapies, particularly gene therapy, has been evaluated, but have yet to make a major clinical impact on treatment of GBM. In a study published by Westphal and colleagues in The Lancet Oncology, the use of sitimagene ceradenovec, a first generation replication-deficient adenovirus containing a prodrug converting enzyme, herpes-simplex virus thymidine kinase, followed by intravenous ganciclovir administration and standard therapy was evaluated compared with standard therapy alone. Patients who received sitimagene ceradenovec had improved time to death or re-intervention, but did not show improvement in overall survival. Patients receiving sitimagene ceradenovec experienced more adverse effects related to treatment, including seizures and hyponatremia. While further studies need to be conducted to determine clinical significance, gene therapy appears to be a viable approach for patients who may be resistant to chemotherapy.     

Response assessment during chemoradiation using a hypercellular/hyperperfused imaging phenotype predicts survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BackgroundAdversely prognostic hypercellular and hyperperfused regions of glioblastoma (GBM) predict progression-free survival, and are a novel target for dose-intensified chemoradiation (chemoRT) recently implemented in a phase II clinical trial. As a secondary aim, we hypothesized that dose-intensified chemoRT would induce greater mid-treatment response of hypercellular/hyperperfused tumor regions vs standard chemoradiation, and that early response would improve overall survival (OS).MethodsForty-nine patients with newly diagnosed GBM underwent prospective, multiparametric high b value diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and perfusion dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) pre-RT and 3-4 weeks into RT. The hypercellular tumor volume (TV_HCV, mean contralateral normal brain + 2SD) and hyperperfused tumor volume (TV_CBV, contralateral normal frontal gray matter + 1SD) were generated using automated thresholding. Twenty-six patients were enrolled on a dose-escalation trial targeting TV_HCV/TV_CBV with 75 Gy in 30 fractions, and 23 non-trial patients comprised the control group. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. The effect of TV_HCV/TV_CBV and Gd-enhanced tumor volume on OS was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional-hazard regression.ResultsMost patients had gross total (47%) or subtotal resection (37%), 25% were MGMT-methylated. Patients treated on the dose-escalation trial had significantly greater reduction in TV_HCV/TV_CBV (41% reduction, IQR 17%-75%) vs non-trial patients (6% reduction, IQR 6%-22%, P = .002). An increase in TV_HCV/TV_CBV during chemoRT was associated with worse OS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.2, 95%CI 1.0-1.4, P = .02), while pre-treatment tumor volumes (P > .5) and changes in Gd-enhanced volume (P = .9) were not.ConclusionsMultiparametric MRI permits identification of therapeutic resistance during chemoRT and supports adaptive strategies in future trials.     

The timing of cranial radiation in elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

There are few and conflicting studies on the optimal timing of initial cranial radiation in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) but none of them have addressed this issue in the elderly population. We used the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database to investigate whether the time interval from surgery to initiation of radiation is a significant prognostic factor for survival in subjects aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed GBM. Cox modeling was used to assess the effect of waiting time on overall survival. We identified a total of 1,375 patients, 296 with biopsies and 1,079 with resections. The median time to the initiation of radiotherapy was 15 days post operation (interquartile range 12–21). In the univariate Cox analysis of those who had debulking surgeries, a waiting time of >22 days showed a significant inverse relationship with survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97, p = 0.02), but after adjustment for confounders, it was not a statistically significant factor in the final Cox model (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.97–1.01, p = 0.14). Therefore, waiting time was not a significant prognostic factor for subjects with biopsies in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. Although effort should be made to initiate radiotherapy as soon as possible after surgical resection/biopsy, a brief delay similar to that experienced by our cohort does not have a significant impact on survival.     

Ototoxicity of cisplatin plus standard radiation therapy vs. accelerated radiation therapy in glioblastoma patients

Summary Purpose: To assess the effect of cisplatin (CDDP) plus concurrent radiation therapy on hearing loss. Methods: 451 patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) were randomly assigned after surgery to: Arm A: Carmustine (BCNU) + standard radiation therapy (SRT); Arm B: BCNU + accelerated radiation therapy (ART: 160 cGy twice daily for 15 days); Arm C: CDDP + BCNU + SRT; or Arm D: CDDP + BCNU + ART. Patients on arms C and D received audiograms at baseline, and prior to the start of RT, and prior to cycles 3 and 6. Otologic toxicities were recorded at each visit. Results: 56% of patients had hearing loss at baseline. 13% and 50% of patients experienced worsening ototoxicity after 1 year of treatment in arms A and B vs. C and D, respectively, with 13% of those on arms C and D experiencing significant ototoxicity (≥ grade 3) at 6 months. Increasing age was associated with an increased risk of ototoxicity. Conclusions: Increased exposure to CDDP increases the risk of ototoxicity over time. Older patients are more susceptible to hearing loss with CDDP. The low proportion of patients with clinically significant ototoxicity suggests that baseline screening is unnecessary in GBM patients.     

A prospective phase II randomized trial of proton radiotherapy vs intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BackgroundTo determine if proton radiotherapy (PT), compared to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), delayed time to cognitive failure in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).MethodsEligible patients were randomized unblinded to PT vs IMRT. The primary endpoint was time to cognitive failure. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), intracranial progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).ResultsA total of 90 patients were enrolled and 67 were evaluable with median follow-up of 48.7 months (range 7.1-66.7). There was no significant difference in time to cognitive failure between treatment arms (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.45-1.75; P = .74). PT was associated with a lower rate of fatigue (24% vs 58%, P = .05), but otherwise, there were no significant differences in PROs at 6 months. There was no difference in PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.44-1.23; P = .24) or OS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.49-1.50; P = .60). However, PT significantly reduced the radiation dose for nearly all structures analyzed. The average number of grade 2 or higher toxicities was significantly higher in patients who received IMRT (mean 1.15, range 0-6) compared to PT (mean 0.35, range 0-3; P = .02).ConclusionsIn this signal-seeking phase II trial, PT was not associated with a delay in time to cognitive failure but did reduce toxicity and patient-reported fatigue. Larger randomized trials are needed to determine the potential of PT such as dose escalation for GBM and cognitive preservation in patients with lower-grade gliomas with a longer survival time.     

Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma

Reliable data on large cohorts of patients with glioblastoma are needed because such studies differ importantly from trials that have a strong bias toward the recruitment of younger patients with a higher performance status. We analyzed the outcome of 676 patients with histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma who were treated consecutively at a single institution over a 7-year period (1997-2003) with follow-up to April 30, 2006. Survival probabilities were 57% at 1 year, 16% at 2 years, and 7% at 3 years. Progression-free survival was 15% at 1 year. Prolongation of survival was significantly associated with surgery in patients with a good performance status, whatever the patient's age, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.55 (p < 0.001) or a 45% relative decrease in the risk of death. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy improved survival, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.61 (p = 0.001) and 0.89 (p = 0.04), respectively, regardless of age, performance status, or residual tumor volume. Recurrence occurred in 99% of patients throughout the follow-up. Reoperation was performed in one-fourth of these patients but was not effective, whether performed within 9 months (hazard ratio, 0.86; p = 0.256) or after 9 months (hazard ratio, 0.98; p = 0.860) of initial surgery, whereas second-line chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) or with temozolomide improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.77; p = 0.008). Surgery followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy should be considered in all patients with glioblastoma, and these treatments should not be withheld because of increasing age alone. The benefit of second surgery at recurrence is uncertain, and new trials are needed to assess its effectiveness. Chemotherapy with PCV or temozolomide seems to be a reasonable option at tumor recurrence.     

Early measures of cognitive function predict survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Cognitive dysfunction is a common manifestation of primary brain tumors. We evaluated the association between early cognitive dysfunction and prognosis in a cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Ninety-one patients who completed neuropsychological assessment after tumor resection but before further treatment were identified in the MD Anderson Neuropsychology database. The relationship between performance on cognitive testing and survival was evaluated using not only Cox proportional hazards models that included clinical factors such as age and KPS but also the Kaplan-Meier method. Median survival time from surgery was 20.7 months. Rates of impairment on cognitive testing ranged from 7.1% for Similarities, to 60.0% for Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised Total Recall. As continuous variables, the Clinical Trial Battery Composite, Trail Making Test Part B, and Controlled Oral Word Association test were associated with survival. Impairment on the Trail Making Test Part B, Controlled Oral Word Association, Similarities, and Digit Span were associated with mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the survival impact of these tests on the group as a whole and in select patient subgroups defined by classification by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA). Cognitive impairment as measured by specific neuropsychological tests is independently associated with poor prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, and this effect remains significant even within patient subgroups defined by RTOG RPA class. Executive function and attention are the cognitive domains most closely associated with prognosis in this analysis.     

A phase II study of concurrent temozolomide and cis-retinoic acid with radiation for adult patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma

PURPOSE: This Phase II study was designed to determine the median survival time of adults with supratentorial glioblastoma treated with a combination of temozolomide (TMZ) and 13-cis-retinoic acid (cRA) given daily with conventional radiation therapy (XRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: This was a single arm, open-labeled, Phase II study. Patients were treated with XRT in conjunction with cRA and TMZ. Both drugs were administered starting on Day 1 of XRT, and chemotherapy cycles continued after the completion of XRT to a maximum of 1 year. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study. Time to progression was known for 55 patients and 6 were censored. The estimated 6-month progression-free survival was 38% and the estimated 1-year progression-free survival was 15%. Median time to progression was estimated as 21 weeks. The estimated 1-year survival was 57%. The median survival was 57 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: The combined therapy was relatively well tolerated, but there was no survival advantage compared with historical studies using XRT either with adjuvant nitrosourea chemotherapy, with TMZ alone, or with the combination of TMZ and thalidomide. Based on this study, cRA does not seem to add a significant synergistic effect to TMZ and XRT.     

Decreasing radiation therapy utilization in adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme: A population-based analysis

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of this study was to assess what factors influence radiation therapy (RT) utilization in patients with glioblastoma and to ascertain how patterns of care have changed over time.

METHODS:

A total of 9103 patients with supratentorial glioblastoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 1973 to 2006 were analyzed. Demographic information was obtained, including age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, and marital status. Treatment characteristics included receipt of RT and surgical resection.

RESULTS:

In total, 76.8% of patients received RT, whereas 78% received resection. Patients of male sex, who were currently married, who were <65 years old, and who underwent resection were more likely to receive RT. The average annual percentage change in RT utilization in the years 1990‐2006 was ?0.41% (95% confidence interval [CI], ?0.23 to ?0.58), whereas for resection it was 0.26% (95% CI, 0.03 to 0.50). This equates to a 6.5% decrease in RT utilization and a 4.2% increase in resection during this time period. Patients treated with RT had a 2‐year overall survival of 11.4%, compared with 5.2% in those not treated with RT (P < .00001). Multivariate analysis showed that younger age (continuous; odds ratio [OR], 0.97; P < .0001), marital status (OR, 1.62; P < .0001), surgical resection (OR, 1.72; P < .0001), and year of diagnosis 1998‐2006 compared with 1990‐1997 (OR, 0.82; P < .0001) were associated with RT utilization, whereas sex, lesion size, and race were not.

CONCLUSIONS:

SEER data show a decreasing utilization of RT in patients with glioblastoma from 1990 to 2006. Patients who were older, who were unmarried, and who underwent biopsy only were less likely to receive RT. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Human interferon beta,nimustine hydrochloride,and radiation therapy in the treatment of newly diagnosed malignant astrocytomas

Summary Previous investigators have reported encouraging results for malignant gliomas treated using a combination of human interferon beta (IFN-) with nimustine hydrochloride (ACNU) and radiation therapy (termed IAR therapy). This study was undertaken to examine further the efficacy of the IAR regimen followed by maintenance therapy with IFN- and ACNU in patients with newly diagnosed malignant astrocytomas. Fifty-eight patients were enrolled onto the trial. IFN- (2 × 10⁶ IU/m²/day × 5 days/week for 8 consecutive weeks) and ACNU (80 mg/m² on days 1 and 36) were administered intravenously concomitant with radiation therapy followed by IFN- (every 2 weeks) and ACNU (every 6 weeks). Of 33 patients assessable for a response, 11 responded (33%), with 4 complete responses. The estimated median overall survival (OS) was 16 months, with values of 58 and 13 months for anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma (GB) patients, respectively. The overall progression free survival (PFS) was 11 months, with values of 31 and 7 months for AA and GB patients, respectively. The IAR therapy was safe and well tolerated. Based on a statistical analysis of the factors that affected the PFS and OS, histologic grade, postoperative Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), and extent of surgery were identified as independent predictors. The postoperative KPS stood out as the most powerful prognostic factor, which was also the best predictor for the response to IAR therapy. Our findings suggest a possible benefit for IAR therapy followed by maintenance therapy mainly in AA. In addition, they emphasize the importance of a preserved KPS after cytoreductive surgery, which could produce a potential benefit for adjuvant therapy and could ultimately lead to a prolonged survival.     

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A systematic review on clinical and technical issues

Background and purpose: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) could represent a new tool to improve the therapeutic ratio in the treatment of glioblastoma. This systematic review investigates the evidence behind the application of IMRT to glioblastoma, assessing the potential benefits from both the clinical and dosimetrical perspective. Materials and methods: Two independent researchers systematically identified all relevant articles available on PubMed and MEDLINE databases until December 2009. Results: Ultimately, seventeen studies were included in the analysis, for a total of 204 treated patients and 148 patient datasets used in planning studies. Most dosimetrical studies provided statistical analysis. Clinical series did not include any randomized controlled study, ultimately hindering a meta-analysis. From the dosimetrical point of view, conformal radiotherapy and IMRT provide similar results in terms of target coverage, while IMRT is better in terms of dose conformity, in reducing the maximum dose to the organs at risk and in healthy brain sparing. In clinical reports, a wide variability was recorded concerning dose per fraction, total dose, and chemotherapy administration. A comprehensive qualitative comparison with literature on similar non-IMRT clinical series showed that in most IMRT series excellent compliance and low rates of toxicity were recorded. Hypofractionated regimens in association with chemotherapy showed results that are even superior to the standard treatment. Conclusions: According to the available data, the dosimetrical advantages of IMRT translate into the clinical capability of delivering higher dose levels in a shorter time. This approach in glioblastoma patients with good prognosis suggests the possibility of improving outcomes without an increase in toxicity.     

Enzastaurin before and concomitant with radiation therapy,followed by enzastaurin maintenance therapy,in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without MGMT promoter hypermethylation

Background

This study''s primary objective was evaluation of the progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS-6) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without O⁶-methylguanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter hypermethylation postsurgically treated with enzastaurin before and concomitantly with radiation therapy, followed by enzastaurin maintenance therapy. PFS-6 of at least 55% was set to be relevant compared with the data of the EORTC 26981/22981 NCIC CE.3 trial.

Methods

Adult patients with a life expectancy of at least 12 weeks who were newly diagnosed with a histologically proven supratentorial glioblastoma without MGMT promoter hypermethylation were eligible. Patients were treated with enzastaurin prior to, concomitantly with, and after standard partial brain radiotherapy. Here we report on a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II study of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma without MGMT promoter hypermethylation treated with enzastaurin and radiation therapy within 4 study periods.

Results

PFS-6 was 53.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.8–65.6). The median overall survival was 15.0 months (95% CI: 11.9–17.9) for all patients, 3.9 months (95% CI: 0.8–9.0) for patients with biopsy, 15.4 months (95% CI: 10.1–17.9) for patients with partial resection, and 18.9 months (95% CI: 13.9–28.5) for patients with complete resection. The safety profile in this study was as expected from previous trials, and the therapy was well tolerated.

Conclusions

PFS-6 missed the primary planned outcome of 55%. The secondary exploratory analysis according to resection status of the different subgroups of patients with biopsies, partial resection, and complete resection demonstrates the strong prognostic influence of resection on overall survival.     

Enzastaurin plus temozolomide with radiation therapy in glioblastoma multiforme: A phase I study

We conducted a phase I study to determine the safety and recommended phase II dose of enzastaurin (oral inhibitor of the protein kinase C-beta [PKCβ] and the PI3K/AKT pathways) when given in combination with radiation therapy (RT) plus temozolomide to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme or gliosarcoma. Patients with Karnofsky performance status ≥60 and no enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs received RT (60 Gy) over 6 weeks, concurrently with temozolomide (75 mg/m² daily) followed by adjuvant temozolomide (200 mg/m²) for 5 days/28-d cycle. Enzastaurin was given once daily during RT and adjuvantly with temozolomide; the starting dose of 250 mg/d was escalated to 500 mg/d if ≤1/6 patients had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during RT and the first adjuvant cycle. Patients continued treatment for 12 adjuvant cycles unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Twelve patients enrolled. There was no DLT in the first 6 patients treated with 250 mg enzastaurin. At 500 mg, 2 of 6 patients experienced a DLT (1 Grade 4 and 1 Grade 3 thrombocytopenia). The patient with Grade 3 DLT recovered to Grade <1 within 28 days and adjuvant temozolomide and enzastaurin was reinitiated with dose reductions. The other patient recovered to Grade <1 toxicity after 28 days and did not restart treatment. Enzastaurin 250 mg/d given concomitantly with RT and temozolomide and adjuvantly with temozolomide was well tolerated and is the recommended phase II dose. The proceeding phase II trial has finished accrual and results will be reported in 2009.