Predictive factors of acute rejection after early cyclosporine withdrawal in renal transplant recipients who receive mycophenolate mofetil: results from a prospective, randomized trial

The aim of this randomized, open-labeled trial was to compare the incidence of acute rejection after an early (3 mo posttransplantation) withdrawal of cyclosporine (CsA) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in renal transplantation. Among 218 eligible recipients, 108 nonsensitized, rejection-free patients who were under a triple drug regimen (CsA-MMF-prednisone) and had received a first kidney from a deceased donor were enrolled. At 3 mo after graft, they were gradually withdrawn from CsA (MMF group, n = 54) or MMF (CsA group, n = 54). A graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of CsA and mycophenolic acid were systematically performed before the randomization. At 1 yr, graft and patient survival rates were 100% in each group. Renal function was improved in the MMF group compared with the CsA group (Cockcroft calculated clearance 64.7 +/- 18.7 versus 56.5 +/- 18.0 ml/min; P = 0.023). However, the probability of acute rejection was higher in the MMF group (18.5 versus 5.6%; P = 0.045). The 10 patients who developed acute rejection after CsA withdrawal had a significantly higher incidence of borderline changes on the randomization biopsy than the 44 rejection-free patients (five of 10 versus eight of 44; P = 0.034), and they displayed a lower area under the curve of mycophenolic acid (43 +/- 9 versus 58 +/- 22 mg/h per L; P = 0.045). Multivariate analysis confirmed that borderline changes and area under the curve of mycophenolic acid were significant risk factors of acute rejection after CsA discontinuation. It is concluded that a systematic graft biopsy and a pharmacokinetic study of mycophenolic acid are needed to reduce the risk for acute rejection after CsA withdrawal.     

Impact of immunosuppression on the incidence of early subclinical renal allograft rejection: implications for protocol biopsy policy

In order to determine the impact of immunosuppression (IS) on the incidence of early subclinical rejection (SCR), we studied two groups of patients receiving different immunosuppressive regimens. Patients received cyclosporin (CsA), azathioprine and prednisolone (group 1; n  = 304) or IS according to immunological risk (group 2; n  = 150). The highest-risk patients received basiliximab induction, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone; medium-risk patients CsA, MMF and prednisolone; low-risk CsA, azathioprine and prednisolone. Protocol biopsies were performed in all patients, irrespective of graft function, on days 7 and 28 post-transplantation. Only patients with good stable function at the time of biopsy were included for assessment of SCR. Group 2 patients showed significant reductions in total rejection frequency (32.6% vs. 57.2%, P  = <0.0001) and SCR frequency in day 7 protocol biopsies (2% vs. 13%, P  = <0.05). In group 2 patients, all SCRs, but not borderline changes, were treated. Untreated borderline changes did not have an adverse impact on graft function at 1 year post-transplantation. New immunosuppressive regimens may reduce subclinical in addition to clinical rejection-frequency, suggesting that the relative benefit of early protocol biopsies in detecting SCR is also reduced.     

Frequency and severity of acute rejection in live- versus cadaveric-donor renal transplants

BACKGROUND: Live donors are an increasingly important source of kidneys for transplantation in Australia. The aim of this study was to compare the rate and severity of rejection between patients receiving kidney transplants from live versus cadaveric donors. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of all patients receiving live-donor (n=109) and cadaveric-donor (n=389) renal transplants at our institution between April 1, 1994, and March 31, 2000. Follow-up was completed on all patients until graft loss, death, or May 31, 2001. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the live-donor and cadaveric groups were similar, except for recipient age (mean+/-SD, 36.3+/-15.6 vs. 44.5+/-14.4 years, respectively; P<0.001); donor age (46.1+/-11.3 vs. 36.1+/-16.4 years, P<0.001); pretransplant dialysis duration (1.36+/-2.1 vs. 3.4+/-4.4 years, P<0.001); and the proportions of patients receiving first allografts (95% vs. 88%, respectively; P<0.05), antibody induction (8% vs. 20%, P<0.01), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (60% vs. 37%, P<0.001). Acute rejection was observed in 48 (44%) live-donor and 108 (28%) cadaveric transplants (P=0.001). Cadaveric donor type was independently predictive of less acute rejection both on logistic regression (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30-0.73; P=0.001) and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.34-0.69; P<0.001). Patients receiving cadaveric-donor transplants were also significantly less likely to receive antibody therapy for rejection (univariate, 18% vs. 9%; P=0.006; multivariate AOR, 0.45; 95% CI, -0.25-0.82; P<0.01), independent of recipient age, gender, race, transplant number, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, sensitization, induction therapy, delayed graft function, MMF use, tacrolimus or cyclosporine A use, sirolimus-everolimus use, year of transplant, donor age, or dialysis duration. However, donor type did not independently influence graft survival, immunologic graft survival, or patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: Live-donor kidney transplant recipients had a higher rate and severity of rejection and a shorter rejection-free period than cadaveric renal transplant recipients. Further consideration of the reasons for this difference and the use of alternative immunosuppressive strategies for live-donor transplants are recommended.     

Clear benefit of mycophenolate mofetil-based triple therapy in reducing the incidence of acute rejection after living donor renal transplantations.

BACKGROUND: According to a pooled analysis of three randomized clinical studies concerning the prevention of acute rejection in cadaveric renal transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) proved superior to azathioprine or placebo in conjunction with cyclosporine (CsA) and steroids. MMF-treated patients showed reduced incidence and severity of acute rejection, similar graft survival, and better graft function over 12 months. However, the multicenter trials did not include the Asian recipients of living donor kidneys. METHODS: To assess the efficacy of MMF as the third component of a triple therapy in addition to CsA-Neoral and steroids in living donor renal transplantation recipients in Asians, a total of 100 recipients were randomized to receive CsA-Neoral and steroids (control group, n=50), or MMF-based triple therapy (1.0 g of MMF twice daily from postoperative day 2, MMF group, n=50). The dosing plan for Neoral and steroids was essentially same between groups. During 12 months of follow-up, we compared the incidence of acute rejection, adverse events such as infections, and 12-month actual graft and patient survival. RESULTS: The graft and patient survival at 1 year was excellent in both groups: 96/98% in the control group and 98/100% in the MMF group, respectively. MMF significantly reduced the proportion of patients with at least one episode of acute rejection (34% in the control group vs. 14% in the MMF group), cumulative incidence of acute rejection episodes (46% vs. 16%), and requirement of antilymphocyte antibody (21.7% vs. 12.5%). In the MMF group, viral infection such as herpes zoster or chicken pox was more prevalent than in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Like cadaveric renal transplantation, this open clinical trial showed MMF to be effective in reducing the incidence and severity of acute rejection if used in conjunction with Neoral and steroids after living donor renal transplantation in Asian ethnicity.     

The impact of mycophenolate mofetil dosing patterns on clinical outcome after renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has proven to be a very effective drug for the prevention of acute rejection following renal transplantation when dosed as prescribed at 2 or 3 g/d. However, circumstances arise in clinical transplantation where the dose must be lowered, either to avoid drug toxicity or because of concurrent infection. The impact on the incidence of acute rejection and graft survival when the MMF dose must be lowered has not previously been investigated. METHODS: In this study, a cohort of 721 kidney transplant recipients who received immunosuppression using MMF in conjunction with cyclosporine and prednisone and OKT3 (n = 425) or Simulect (n = 296) induction were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were compared and contrasted between patients with and without MMF dose changes within the first year post-transplantation. RESULTS: The majority of patients (70.3%, n = 507) had at least one dose change within the first post-transplant year. Compared with the 214 patients who did not have a dose change, these patients had a much higher incidence of acute rejection within the first post-transplant year (23.3% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). This resulted in a significantly decreased 3-yr death-censored graft survival (76.3% vs. 88.3%, p = 0.003). The incidence of acute rejection for patients who had a dose change was highest if the dose change occurred within the first post-transplant month (34.4%). The incidence of acute rejection for the dose change patients was influenced by recipient ethnicity (African-American vs. Caucasian) and the type of induction agent used (OKT3 vs. Simulect). CONCLUSION: Altering the dose of MMF within the first post-transplant year correlated with a significantly worse clinical outcome in this cohort of renal transplant recipients. These data suggest that avoidance of MMF dose changes within the first year after renal transplantation would result in improved graft survival.     

Protocol biopsies in kidney transplant recipients: histologic findings as prognostic markers for graft function and outcome

The aim of the present study was to identify subclinical and borderline rejections as well as histological markers of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) among protocol biopsies performed at 1 and 6 months after living related kidney transplantation to assess their possible implications for graft function. Twenty paired allograft biopsies performed at 1 and 6 months were reviewed according to the Banff scoring scheme. The mean ages of donors and recipients were 59.6 +/- 13.8 and 34.4 +/- 8.7 years, respectively. Among all biopsies only 10% (4/40) showed no histopathological lesions. At the first month borderline rejection was shown in 35% and subclinical rejection in 10% of patients. At 6 months the proportion of findings was even higher, namely, 40% and 30%, respectively. When divided according to donor age, donors above 55 years showed a mean CAN score of 2.33 +/- 1.56 which increased to 5.0 +/- 2.26 on the 6 month biopsy (214.3%). Unexpectedly, the proportion of these changes in the younger donor group also increased by 173.3%, which might have been explained by the greater number of borderline and subclinical rejections in the younger donor group at the 1 month biopsy. In conclusion, 1 month biopsy may be valuable to determine borderline and subclinical rejection and to prognosticate the outcome of renal allograft function. Our findings suggest a greater susceptibility of histological deterioration among the older donor population. However, the presence of an untreated rejection in the younger donor pool leads to a rapid impairment of the graft function accelerating the process of chronic allograft nephropathy.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND: This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.     

Impact of mycophenolate mofetil on recurrent rejection in kidney transplant patients

PURPOSE: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as a valuable adjunctive agent in renal transplantation. However, due to intolerable adverse effects associated with MMF use in our transplant population, we have used MMF selectively in patients at high risk for recurrent graft rejection, since these patients are known to be at risk for poor long-term graft outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of MMF in preventing the recurrence of acute rejection following an initial rejection episode in kidney transplant patients in the first year following transplantation. METHODS: Forty-four kidney transplant recipients were given MMF prospectively following treatment of their initial rejection episode to prevent recurrent rejection. MMF 1-2 g/d was given. Doses were adjusted based on tolerance; MMF therapy was to be continued for at least 6 months. The control group consisted of 124 consecutive kidney transplant recipients who had received standard anti-rejection therapy without the addition of MMF. Maintenance immunosuppression consisted predominantly of cyclosporine, prednisone+/-azathioprine. Anti-rejection therapy for both groups consisted of either corticosteroids (methylprednisolone 500 mg i.v. for 3 d or oral prednisone 2 mg/kg/d with rapid taper over 3 wk), OKT3 5 mg/d for 10 d or ATG 15 mg/kg/d for 10 d. All rejection episodes were confirmed by biopsy. RESULTS: The majority of rejection episodes were characterized histologically as mild or moderate. Most patients (76%) received corticosteroids for treatment of their first rejection episode. There was a 68% reduction in the incidence of recurrent rejection episodes within the first year of transplant in patients receiving MMF; only 14% of recipients receiving MMF developed recurrent rejection compared to 44% of patients in the control group (p<0.05). Approximately 50% of patients developed MMF-associated adverse effects (leukopenia, GI toxicity). Only 52% of patients remained on MMF at 6 months. One-yr graft survival was 86% in the MMF group and 89% in the control group (p>0.05). One-year patient survival was 93 and 100%, respectively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of MMF to maintenance therapy for patients experiencing acute renal allograft rejection may prevent recurrent rejection episodes in the subsequent follow-up year.     

Mycophenolic acid concentrations are associated with cardiac allograft rejection.

BACKGROUND: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy decreases the incidence of allograft rejection following solid-organ transplantation. Current dosing strategies of MMF are not routinely adjusted based on mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), MPA trough, or free MPA (fMPA) AUC values. METHODS: To determine the clinical significance of MPA concentrations following orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), we measured pre-dose MPA trough, MPA free fraction, an estimated MPA AUC using an abbreviated sampling schedule, and fMPA AUC in 38 consecutive patients. We measured MPA concentrations using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method and graded endomyocardial biopsies based on the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grading system. RESULTS: The MPA values for the study group were as follows: MPA trough of 1.2 +/- 0.6 microg/ml; MPA free fraction of 1.9 +/- 0.4%; MPA AUC of 44.5 +/- 16. 1 microg/hour/ml; and fMPA AUC of 0.83 +/- 0.30 microg/hour/ml. We compared patients with Grade 0 (n = 22), Grade 1 (n = 13), or Grade 2/3 (n = 3). The MPA AUC values were lower in patients with Grade 2/3 than in patients with Grade 0 (26.1 +/- 6.6 vs 42.8 +/- 14.0 microg/hour/ml, p < 0.08) or Grade 1 rejection (26.1 +/- 6.6 vs 51.7 +/- 17.5 microg/hour/ml, p < 0.05). The fMPA AUC values were lower in patients with Grade 2/3 than with patients with Grade 0 (0.49 +/- 0.11 vs 0.81 +/- 0.25 microg/hour/ml, p < 0.05) or Grade 1 (0.49 +/- 0.25 vs 0.95 +/- 0.34 microg/hour/ml, p < 0.05) rejection. We noted a trend in MPA trough concentrations between patients with Grade 2/3 vs 0 (0.65 +/- 0.15 vs 1.20 +/- 0.58 microg/ml, p = 0.15) and Grade 1 (0.65 +/- 0.15 vs 1.24 +/- 0.72 microg/ml, p = 0.14) rejection. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results suggest that lower MPA AUC and fMPA AUC values are associated with cardiac allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients. Individualizing MMF dosing based on MPA determinations may minimize the risk of rejection following OHT.     

Randomized trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation: 5‐year follow‐up

The aim of this study was to compare the long‐term safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens consisting of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF after steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. One hundred and thirty‐one patients were randomized to receive either CsA (n = 63) or TAC (n = 68). Of these, 117 patients satisfied the criteria for steroid withdrawal (no biopsy‐proven rejection episode and serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl 6 months after transplantation). Fifty‐five recipients were of the CsA group, and 62 were of the TAC group. The 5‐year graft survival rate did not differ between groups (90.5% vs. 93.3% respectively; P = 0.55). The cumulative incidence of acute rejection 5 years after transplantation was 16.4% and 8.1% for the CsA and TAC groups respectively (P = 0.15). Post‐transplantation diabetes mellitus was more frequent in the TAC group than in the CsA group (P = 0.05), but the incidence of other side‐effects did not differ between groups. In conclusion, CsA‐ and TAC‐based regimens in conjunction with MMF have similar patient‐ and graft survival rates in low‐risk patients who underwent steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation.     

Hypogammaglobulinemia following cardiac transplantation: a link between rejection and infection.

BACKGROUND: Hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) has been reported after solid organ transplantation and is noted to confer an increased risk of opportunistic infections. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we sought to assess the relationship between severe HGG to infection and acute cellular rejection following heart transplantation. METHODS: Between February 1997 and January 1999, we retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome of 111 consecutive heart transplant recipients who had immunoglobulin G (IgG) level monitoring at 3 and 6 months post-transplant and when clinically indicated. RESULTS: Eighty-one percent of patients were males, mean age 54 +/- 13 years, and the mean follow-up period was 13.8 +/- 5.7 months. Patients had normal IgG levels prior to transplant (mean 1137 +/- 353 mg/dl). Ten percent (11 of 111) of patients developed severe HGG (IgG < 350 mg/dl) post-transplant. The average time to the lowest IgG level was 196 +/- 125 days. Patients with severe HGG were at increased risk of opportunistic infections compared to patients with IgG > 350 mg/dl (55% [6 of 11] vs. 5% [5 of 100], odds ratio = 22.8, p < 0.001). Compared to patients with no rejection, patients who experienced three or more episodes of rejection had lower mean IgG (580 +/- 309 vs. 751 +/- 325, p = 0.05), and increased incidence of severe HGG (33% [7 of 21] vs. 2.8% [1 of 35], p = 0.001). The incidence of rejection episodes per patient at 1 year was higher in patients with severe HGG compared to patients with IgG >350 (2.82 +/- 1.66 vs. 1.36 +/- 1.45 episodes/patient, p = 0.02). The use of parenteral steroid pulse therapy was associated with an increased risk of severe HGG (odds ratio = 15.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe HGG after cardiac transplantation may develop as a consequence of intensification of immunosuppressive therapy for rejection and hence, confers an increased risk of opportunistic infections. IgG level may be a useful marker for identifying patients at high risk.     

Long-term impact of subclinical inflammation diagnosed by protocol biopsy one year after renal transplantation

The long-term impact of subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) on renal graft function remains poorly understood. Furthermore, the interpretation of borderline lesions is difficult and their incidence is variable. The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of subclinical inflammation (SCI) in protocol biopsies performed 1-year after renal transplantation. SCI was defined as the presence of borderline lesions or SCAR according to the Banff 2005 classification. The patients included were a subpopulation of the CONCEPT study in which patients were randomized 3 months after transplantation to receive either sirolimus (SRL) or cyclosporine A (CsA) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil. At 1 year, we observed SCI in 37 of the 121 patients observed with an evaluable biopsy. The incidence was more frequent in the SRL group (SRL 45.2% vs. CsA 15.3%). At 30 months , SCI was associated with a significantly lower level of estimated glomerular filtration rate (mean MDRD 50.8 [±13.3] vs. 57.7 [±16.3] mL/min/1.73 m(2) , p = 0.035). In conclusion, SCI at 1-year posttransplantation is associated with worsening renal function and is more frequent in SRL-treated patients. Therefore, evaluation of SCI may be a valuable tool to allow the optimization of immunosuppressive regimens.     

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.     

"Old-for-old" cadaveric renal transplantation: surgical findings, perioperative complications and outcome

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical findings and outcome of locally allocated, blood-group-compatible but HLA-unmatched cadaveric kidneys in first renal transplantation of donor/recipient pairs aged 65 years and above (Eurotransplant Senior Program=ESP). METHODS: 26 patients of the study group (donor age 70.4 +/- 3.6/recipient age 67.7 +/- 2.8) were compared to 30 controls aged 60 and above (mean recipient age 62.6 +/- 2.3/mean donor age 43.8 +/- 15.3). For controls kidney allocation included HLA matching. RESULTS: Cold ischemic time (ESP vs. controls 501 vs. 883 min; p<0.05) and mean number of HLA mismatches (4.2 +/- 1.36 vs. 1.6 +/- 1.62; p<0.05) differed significantly. Delayed graft function was lower in the study group (12% vs. 43%; p<0.05), rejection episodes in the ESP group were numerous but did not differ significantly from the controls (46% vs. 30%; p=0.21). More intraoperative complications and a higher incidence of donor organ arteriosclerosis (p<0.05) were seen in the ESP group. Three-year graft survival uncensored and censored for death with functioning graft did not differ, even though mean creatinine and creatinine clearance differed significantly beginning at month three. Three-year patient survival (55% vs. 81%) differed in favour of the control group, even though the difference was not significant due to small number of patients. CONCLUSION: "Old-for-old" kidney transplantation with local allocation yields graft survival rates comparable to HLA-matched young grafts and is a good approach to extend the donor and recipient pool. Careful patient selection is advised.     

FTY720 versus MMF with Cyclosporine in de novo Renal Transplantation: A 1-Year, Randomized Controlled Trial in Europe and Australasia

FTY720 is a novel immunomodulator investigated in de novo renal transplantation and other therapeutic areas including multiple sclerosis. This 1-year multicenter, randomized, phase III study in 668 de novo renal transplant patients compared FTY720 2.5 mg plus full-dose cyclosporine (FDC) or FTY720 5.0 mg plus reduced-dose cyclosporine (RDC), with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus FDC. The primary efficacy endpoint was the composite incidence of first treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or premature study discontinuation at month 12. Primary efficacy with FTY720 2.5 mg and MMF (32.4% and 30.2%; p = NS), plus mortality and BPAR incidence, were comparable. Patients receiving FTY720 5.0 mg plus RDC were discontinued from treatment due to increased risk of acute rejection (primary endpoint incidence 47.3%). FTY720 was associated with lower creatinine clearance (month 12: 53.1, 56.0 vs. 65.1 mL/min; p < 0.001) and more macular edema cases (2.2% and 1.3% vs. 0%), whereas cytomegalovirus infections were higher with MMF (6.2% and 10.6% vs. 18.1% p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0139, respectively). FTY720 2.5 mg provided comparable rejection prophylaxis over 12 months versus MMF; however, FTY720 5.0 mg did not support a 50% reduction in cyclosporine exposure. The cause of macular edema cases and lower creatinine clearance with FTY720 in de novo transplantation needs further investigation.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Mycophenolate mofetil: ten years' experience of a renal transplant unit

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use in renal transplantation has allowed a significant decrease in early acute rejection rates. We retrospectively evaluated the incidence of acute rejection episodes, renal function at the first year posttransplant, patient and graft survivals, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection rate, influence of the degree of sensitization, and number of MHC antigen mismatches on graft survival in two groups of patients receiving either MMF or azathioprine. Group 1 included 149 patients receiving cyclosporine, MMF, and prednisolone; group 2 included 191 patients receiving cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone. The two groups did not differ in terms of age, sex, degree of sensitization (expressed as percentage of antibodies reactive to panel), MHC mismatch number, cold ischemia time, donor age, or anti-thymocyte globulin induction. In group 1 (MMF) there was a significant decrease in early acute rejection rate (19% vs 57%, P < .0001), longer graft survival at 10 years (92% vs 75%, P = .006), and higher rate of CMV infection (22% vs 12%, P = .004). Renal function at the first year posttransplant and patient survival during follow-up did not differ between the groups. The degree of sensitization influenced graft survival in group 2. The number of MHC mismatches did not influence graft survival in either group. With MMF, there was a significant reduction in early acute rejection rate, a significant increase in graft survival at 10-year follow-up, and diminished impact of the degree of sensitization on graft survival.     

雷公藤多苷对移植肾长期存活率的影响

目的:探讨雷公藤多苷(TW)作为免疫抑制剂对肾移植患者长期存活率的疗效及副作用.方法:104例患者在肾移植术后采用TW 泼尼松(Pred) 环孢霉素(GsA) 硫唑嘌呤(AZa)免疫抑制剂治疗,48例患者在肾移植术后采用Pred GsA 骁悉(MMF)免疫抑制剂治疗,就以下方面对两组患者进行观察比较:(1)术后5年内发生排斥反应及临界改变情况;(2)外周血白细胞下降、肝功能异常的发生率;(3)严重感染情况;(4)出现尿蛋白情况;(5)术后5年内肾功能变化情况及移植肾5年存活率.结果:5年内AZa TW组急性排斥反应及临界改变的发生率较MMF组低,分别为11.5%、16.7%和4.8%、6.3%(P＞0.05);GPT高于正常的发生率分别为7.7%、16.6%(P＞0.05);外周血白细胞低于正常的发生率分别为0.96%、18.8%(P＜0.01);严重感染的发生率分别为1.9%、18.8%(P＜0.05),5年内出现蛋白尿的患者例数分别为17.3%、29.2%(P＞0.05),两组移植肾5年存活率相似,分别为89.6%、85.4%(P＞0.05).结论:在肾移植术后应用CsA Pred AZa TW免疫抑制方案是可行的,既可以使肾移植术后急性排斥反应减少,同时还能减少蛋白尿及慢性排斥反应的发生率下降,为国内提高移植肾长期存活率提供了一条新的途径.     

Comparison of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium with mycophenolate mofetil in living renal allograft transplantation

OBJECTIVE: Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (MPS) has been developed to decrease the GI side effects of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). We did a retrospective analysis of 112 patients to compare the safety and efficacy of enteric coated MPS vs MMF in living renal transplantation. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups. Group A who received MPS [Novartis, Basel, Switzerland] [1.08-1.44 g/d] included 53 patients of mean age 33.5 +/- 11.9 yrs, and M:F gender ratio 37:15 with a mean donor age of 43.2 +/- 9.9 years. Group B who received MMF [1.5-2.0 g/d] included 59 subjects of mean age 33.2 +/- 9.9 yrs and M:F gender ratio 57:6, with a mean donor age of 41.4 +/- 10.9 years. All patients received cyclosporine and prednisolone in addition to mycophenolate. Mean follow-up in the two groups was 11.6 +/- 7.0 and 12.6 +/- 8.5 months, respectively. RESULTS: There were 11 (20.7%) rejection episodes in Group A and 12 (20.3%) rejection episodes in Group B (P = NS). Incidence of CMV disease was 9.61% and 10.1%, and of other infections, 88.7% and 74.7% in Groups A and Group B, respectively [P = NS]. The incidence of GI (18.9% & 20.3%) and hematologic toxicities (9.4% & 5.1%) were similar in the groups. Patient and graft survivals in Group A were 91.9% & 86.6%, and in Group B was 91.3% & 91.3%, respectively [P = NS]. CONCLUSION: Mycophenolate sodium is an alternative immunosuppressant to mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients with a similar efficacy and safety profile.     

Impact of dose reductions on efficacy outcome in heart transplant patients receiving enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil at 12 months post-transplantation

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) dose reduction is associated with increased risk of rejection and graft loss in renal transplantation. This analysis investigated the impact of MPA dose changes with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo heart transplant recipients. In a 12-month, single-blind trial, 154 patients (EC-MPS, 78; MMF, 76) were randomized to either EC-MPS (1080 mg bid) or MMF (1500 mg bid) in combination with cyclosporine and steroids. The primary efficacy variable was the incidence of treatment failure, comprising a composite of biopsy-proven (BPAR) and treated acute rejection, graft loss or death. Significantly fewer patients receiving EC-MPS required > or =2 dose reductions than patients on MMF (26.9% vs. 42.1% of patients, p = 0.048). Accordingly, the average daily dose of EC-MPS as a percentage of the recommended dose was significantly higher than for MMF (88.4% vs. 79.0%, p = 0.016). Among patients requiring > or =1 dose reduction, the incidence of treated BPAR grade > or =3A was significantly lower with EC-MPS compared with MMF (23.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.032). These data suggest that EC-MPS-treated heart transplant patients are less likely to require multiple dose reductions than those on MMF which may be associated with a significantly lower risk of treated BPAR > or =3A.