Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for middle or lower esophageal carcinoma

Thoracoscopic mobilization of esophagus and laparoscopic mobilization of stomach with cervical anastomosis is employed widely in minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal carcinoma. However, it is associated with high incidence of complications, including recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and anastomotic leak. This paper summarizes the key techniques in total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis for MIE in 62 patients of middle or lower esophageal cancer between March 2012 and August 2013. Total laparoscopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy with intrathoracic anastomosis was performed to treat the middle or lower esophageal cancer. Laparoscopic and thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy was performed using a circular stapler (Johnson and Johnson) intrathoracically to staple esophagogastric anastomosis and reconstruct the digestive tract. In addition, we performed tension-relieving anastomotic suture and embedded with pedicled omental flap. Compared with the trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil) approach, the technique reported here is safe, feasible and user-friendly. Total thoracoscopic intrathoracic anastomosis can be performed with a circular stapler (Johnson and Johnson).     

A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer

SUMMARY. Cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are commonly used for reconstruction after esophagectomy because of the lower mortality rate associated with an anastomotic leak compared to intrathoracic anastomoses. However, cervical esophagogastric anastomoses have been criticized for their higher leak rates, stricture formation and greater need for later dilatations when compared with intrathoracic anastomoses. Multiple studies have looked at varying techniques to improve the outcome of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. This study was performed to determine whether a partially stapled (posterior stapled wall and anterior hand‐sewn wall) anastomosis reliably reduced leaks and the need for later dilatation. From January 2001 to March 2006, 168 patients who underwent cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following esophagectomy (transhiatal or three‐hole) for cancer were identified. Beginning in September 2003, the partially stapled technique was introduced and used in 79 patients. Clinical outcomes were compared to patients in whom hand‐sewn technique was used (n = 89). Outcomes related to anastomotic leak, other hospital complications, length of stay, postoperative dilatations and survival were compared using Student's t‐tests and chi‐square tests (P < 0.05), as well as multiple regression analyses. An anastomotic leak occurred in 10 (12.7%) patients who received a partially stapled anastomosis. A hand‐sewn anastomosis was complicated by an anastomotic leak in 24 patients (27.0%). This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.021). This lowered incidence of leak was associated with an earlier initiation of oral feeds (median 7 vs. 9.5 days, P < 0.001) and a reduction in hospital stay (median 10 vs. 15 days, P < 0.001). Furthermore, dysphagia associated with stricture requiring postoperative dilatations was markedly diminished in the stapled anastomosis [23 (31.3%) vs. 49 (55.1%), P = 0.001]. The partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative anastomotic leaks and the need for postoperative dilatation to treat strictures compared to the hand‐sewn anastomosis.     

Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Gastric transposition with esophagogastric anastomosis is a common method of reconstruction after esophagectomy for cancer. The anastomosis can be fashioned using a handsewn or stapled technique. The choice of anastomotic technique is often debated but there is little evidence to support the use of one method over the other. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the effect of esophagogastric anastomotic method (handsewn or circular stapled) on patient outcomes. Medline and manual searches were done (completed independently and in duplicate) to identify all published RCTs that addressed the issue of handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer. The selection process was inclusive; no trials were excluded. Trial validity assessment was done and a trial quality score was assigned. Major outcomes for quantitative data synthesis included operative mortality, anastomotic leaks, anastomotic strictures, cardiac morbidity, and pulmonary morbidity. A random-effects model was used and relative risk was the principal measure of effect. Systematic qualitative review was used for other outcomes such as duration of operation and time to complete the anastomosis. Data on cancer survival were not available in the RCTs. Five RCTs were selected with quality scores ranging from 2 to 3 (5-point Jadad scale). Selection and validity agreement was strong. Relative risk (95% confidence interval, CI; P-value), expressed as handsewn vs. stapled (treatment vs. control), was 0.45 (0.20, 1.00; P=0.05) for operative mortality, 0.79 (0.44, 1.42; P=0.43) for anastomotic leaks, 0.60 (0.27, 1.33; P=0.21) for anastomotic strictures, 0.99 (0.55, 1.77; P=0.97) for cardiac morbidity, and 0.93 (0.63, 1.37; P=0.72) for pulmonary morbidity. Data synthesized from existing RCTs show that handsewn and circular stapled esophagogastric anastomotic techniques give similar results for anastomotic outcomes, such as leaks and strictures. The stapled anastomotic method appears to increase operative mortality (P=0.05). Although it is difficult to explain this finding, it should not be dismissed. Several hypotheses are discussed.     

Albert-Lembert versus hybrid-layered suture in hand sewn end-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal squamous cell carcinoma resection

Background

Hand sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis (CEGA) is regarded as preferred technique by surgeons after esophagectomy. However, considering the anastomotic leakage and stricture, the optimal technique for performing this anastomosis is still under debate.

Methods

Between November 2010 and September 2012, 230 patients who underwent esophagectomy with hand sewn end-to-end (ETE) CEGA for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were analyzed retrospectively, including 111 patients underwent Albert-Lembert suture anastomosis and 119 patients underwent hybrid-layered suture anastomosis. Anastomosis construction time was recorded during operation. Anastomotic leakage was recorded through upper gastrointestinal water-soluble contrast examination. Anastomotic stricture was recorded during follow up.

Results

The hybrid-layered suture was faster than Albert-Lembert suture (29.40±1.24 min vs. 33.83±1.41 min, P=0.02). The overall anastomotic leak rate was 7.82%, the leak rate in hybrid-layered suture group was significantly lower than that in Albert-Lembert suture group (3.36% vs. 12.61%, P=0.01). The overall anastomotic stricture rate was 9.13%, the stricture rate in hybrid-layered suture group was significantly lower than that in Albert-Lembert suture group (5.04% vs. 13.51%, P=0.04).

Conclusions

Hand sewn ETE CEGA with hybrid-layered suture is associated with lower anastomotic leakage and stricture rate compared to hand sewn ETE CEGA with Albert-Lembert suture.     

器械吻合在胸中下段食管癌手术中应用231例

目的:总结胸中下段食管癌切除术后胸内食管胃端侧器械吻合的经验和体会.方法:使用国产WH-Y型胃肠吻合器对231例胸中下段食管癌患者进行胸内器械吻合.231例患者术前均经上消化道钡餐造影及纤维胃镜病理检查明确诊断为食管鳞癌.其中胸中段食管癌51例,下段食管癌180例.病变长度0.512cm.本文回顾性分析2005-01/2009-12食管癌患者231例的临床资料.结果:本组231例中,吻合口瘘3例,发生率1.30%(3/231),其中死亡1例,为术后4d出现吻合口瘘.余2例为术后10d出现吻合口瘘,均经通畅引流、营养支持等内科保守治疗治愈.术后4w发生吻合口狭窄2.16%(3/231),均予以胃镜下球囊扩张后治愈.本组手术平均耗时160min,出血平均为500mL,术后平均住院15d.术后随访207例,1、3、5年生存率为53.1%、27.5%、18.4%.结论:应用器械吻合行胸内食管胃端侧吻合术效果可靠,操作方便.     

Side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic esophagogastric anastomosis reduces the incidence of leaks and stenosis

SUMMARY.   Trans-hiatal esophagectomy with a hand-sewn anastomosis was for 2 decades the preferred approach in our institution for patients with esophageal cancer. In our experience, this anastomotic technique was associated with a 12% leak rate and a 48% rate of stricture requiring dilatation. We sought to determine if a side-to-side intra-thoracic anastomosis was associated with a lower rate of anastomotic stricture and leak. Thirty-three consecutive patients with distal esophageal cancer or Barrett's esophagus with high grade dysplasia underwent a trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled intra-thoracic anastomosis. The overall morbidity was 27%, with no anastomotic stricture or leaks. One patient died (3%). The median time to the resumption of an oral diet was 7 days (range 5–28), and the median length of stay in hospital was 9 days (range 6–45). Trans-thoracic esophagectomy with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis is safe and it is associated with a very low rate of anastomotic complications. We consider this to be the procedure of choice for patients with distal esophageal cancers.     

Side-to-Side Stapled Anastomosis Strongly Reduces Anastomotic Leak Rates in Crohn’s Disease Surgery

PURPOSE Anastomotic configuration may influence anastomotic leak rates. The aim of this study was to determine whether a side-to-side stapled ileocolonic anastomosis produces lower anastomotic leak rates than those with a handsewn end-to-end ileocolonic anastomosis after ileocecal or ileocolonic resection for Crohns disease.METHODS A series of 122 consecutive patients underwent elective ileocecal or ileocolonic resection with ileocolonic anastomosis for Crohns disease from January 1998 to June 2003: 71 had handsewn end-to-end anastomosis and 51 had side-to-side stapled anastomosis. The choice between the two anastomoses was left to the surgeons preference. A retrospective analysis was performed to assess if there was any difference in anastomotic leak rates.RESULTS The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, preoperative presence of abscess or fistula, history of smoking, and albumin levels. More patients were taking steroids in the handsewn group than in the stapled group. In the handsewn group there were 10 anastomotic leaks (14.1 percent) and in the stapled group there was 1 anastomotic leak (2.0 percent) (risk difference, +12.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7–22.2; P = 0.02). Anastomotic configuration was the sole variable that influenced anastomotic leak rates at univariate analysis. Mortality was 1.4 percent in the handsewn group and 0 percent in the stapled group. Complications other than anastomotic leak developed in 11 patients in the handsewn group and in 6 patients in the stapled group. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 12.3 days in the handsewn group and 9.7 days in the stapled group (P = 0.03). Excluding those patients who had an anastomotic leak, the difference was still present (handsewn group, 10.1 days; stapled group, 9.1 days; P = 0.04).CONCLUSION Although confirmation from randomized, controlled trials is required, side-to-side stapled anastomosis seems to substantially decrease anastomotic leak rates in surgical patients with Crohns disease, compared with handsewn end-to-end anastomosis. Postoperative hospital stay decreased in the stapled anastomosis group, and this was not entirely a result of decreased anastomotic leak rates.Published online: XX February 2005.     

Partial esophagogastrostomy with esophagogastric anastomosis below the aortic arch in cardiac carcinoma: characteristics and treatment of postoperative anastomotic leakage

Background

Anastomotic leakage is a severe and common complication for surgeries of cardiac cancer. Here we explore the clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment strategies of anastomotic leakage in cardiac carcinoma patients after esophagogastric anastomosis.

Methods

From January 2009 to December 2013, 1,196 patients with cardiac carcinoma underwent esophagectomy and esophagogastric anastomosis in Cancer Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Of them, 25 patients developed symptomatic anastomotic leakage. Their clinical data were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

Among these 25 patients with anastomotic leakage, three died after active treatment and fifteen healed with thoracic drainage time 18-115 days. The left seven patients who did not heal until discharge developed chronic infection sinus of anastomotic leakage. Without infection symptoms, they were discharged 30-100 days after surgery with nasoenteral tube and thoracic drainage.

Conclusions

Anastomotic leakage in cardiac carcinoma patients after esophagogastric anastomosis can be classified into five subtypes: occult type, left thoracic type, right thoracic type, mediastinal type, and mixd type. Subtyping of anastomotic leakage is useful and convenient for diagnosis and treatment.     

Angleplasty in gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy

Anastomotic leakage after radical esophagectomy is mostly caused by the hypoxia and high tension at the esophagogastric anastomotic site. Here, we introduce a new surgical technique, 'Angleplasty,' to enable the tensionless anastomosis at a highly oxygenic site of gastric conduit. In short, the seromuscular layer is cut for a perpendicular direction against a lesser curvature at a gastric angle and the gastric wall is carefully divided between the muscular and submucosal layers for longitudinal direction for 4–5 cm in length. Then, the wound is closed with seromuscular sutures for longitudinal direction. With this maneuver, the lesser curvature of the gastric roll is significantly elongated and the anastomosis site of the gastric conduit can be moved more distal on the greater curvature of the stomach where it is expected to receive more oxygen supply. This technique takes only several minutes, but provides highly favorable conditions for esophagogastric anastomosis and thus is clinically useful to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.     

Treatment of anastomotic leaks with metallic stent after esophagectomies

The diagnosis and the treatment of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy are the keys to reduce the morbidity and mortality after this surgery. The stent plays an important role in the treatment of the leakage and in the prevention of reoperation. We have analyzed the database of the section of the esophagogastric surgery of Donostia University Hospital from June 2003 to May 2012. It is a retrospective study of 113 patients with esophagectomy resulting from tumor, and 24 (21.13%) of these patients developed anastomotic leak. Of these 24 patients, 13 (54.16%) have been treated with a metallic stent and 11 (45.84%) without a stent. The average age of the patients was 55.69 and 62.45 years, respectively. All patients treated with and without a stent have been males. Eight (61.5%) stents were placed in the neck and five (38.5%) in the chest. However, among the 11 fistulas treated without a stent, 9 patients had cervical anastomosis (81.81%) and 2 patients (18.18%) had anastomosis in the chest. Twelve patients (92.30%) with a stent preserve digestive continuity, and 10 patients (90.90%) were treated without a stent. One patient died in the stent group and one in the nonstent group. The treatment with metallic stent of the anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is an option that can prevent reoperation in these patients, but it does not decrease the average of the hospital stay. The stent may be more useful in thoracic anastomotic leaks.     

Use of efficient purse-string stapling technique for esophagogastric anastomosis in minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly accepted in the treatment of locoregional or advanced esophageal cancer. Laparoscopic-thoracoscopic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy has been proved to be effective in treating middle and distal esophageal cancer, however, intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is technically complex. When using circular stapler for making intrathoracic anastomosis in MIE, both transoral and transthoracic methods are frequently used for delivering the anvil into the esophageal stump. Herein, we report a new method to construct a thoracoscopic esophagogastric anastomosis by using a circular stapler: efficient purse-string stapling technique (EST). This technique is easy to handle and especially good to be used in patients with distal esophageal cancer or expanded esophageal cavity.KEYWORDS : Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE), Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, esophageal cancer, esophagogastric anastomosis, efficient purse-string stapling technique (EST)     

Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to critically evaluate acute and long-term complications of hand-sewn and semimechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following resection of primary esophageal adenocarcinoma. Between February 1991 and 2001, 91 consecutive patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy (transthoracic, n=49; transhiatal, n=42), transposing a gastric tube based on the right gastroepiploic artery. All esophagogastric anastomoses were performed in the left neck using a hand-sewn technique (n=53) and, from September 1997, a side-to-side semimechanical technique (n=38). Outcomes evaluated were anastomotic leak rates, length of stay, and development of strictures. Postoperative mortality was 4.4% (all cardiopulmonary causes). Fifty-eight patients (63.7%) had an uncomplicated postoperative course, with a median postoperative length of stay of 10 days (vs. 20 days with associated morbidity; P 相似文献   

Esophageal anastomosis following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of hand-sewn and stapling technique

BACKGROUND/AIMS: During the past 4 years, we have experienced a marked reduction in the incidence of esophageal anastomotic leakage and/or stricture coinciding with the use of a mechanical circular stapler for gastric cancer patients. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed medical records of gastric cancer patients who underwent a total or proximal gastrectomy, and compared the leakage or stricture of stapled anastomosis with the hand-sewn anastomosis technique. A total of 390 esophageal anastomosis were performed between January 1978 and August 1997. Two types of mechanical circular staplers were used (EEA and CDH). RESULTS: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (3.3%) of 390 cases; three (4.5%) of 66 cases with hand-sewn anastomosis, and 10 (3.1%) of 324 cases with stapled anastomosis (EEA: 4.5%, CDH: 0%). The anastomotic leakage rate was significantly lower in the CDH stapler group than in the EEA stapler group. Anastomotic stricture occurred in one (1.5%) of 66 cases of hand-sewn anastomosis, and 16 (4.9%) of 324 cases of stapled anastomosis (EEA: 5.9%, CDH: 2.9%). There were no significant differences in the stricture rate between the hand-sewn group and the stapler group. CONCLUSIONS: Stapling anastomosis using a CDH stapler led to a reduction in the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Surgeons must, however, continue to be aware of anastomotic stricture.     

Effects of low-dose preoperative irradiation on low anterior anastomosis in dogs

Twenty mongrel dogs underwent preoperative radiation therapy to the colon and rectum using the Nominal Standard Dose Equation to simulate treatment with 2000 rads. Each dog then underwent anterior resection of the rectosigmoid, and reconstruction was randomized into two groups consisting of either handsewn or EEA-stapled anastomoses. Anastomoses were examined digitally and radiographically on the day of surgery and on the seventh postoperative day. There were three radiographic leaks among the ten dogs having the handsewn anastomoses and one radiographic leak among the ten dogs having the EEA-stapled anastomoses. There was one clinically significant leak which occurred in a dog having an EEA-stapled anastomosis and was associated with peritonitis and death. The overall leak rate was 30 per cent among dogs having handsewn anastomoses and 20 per cent among dogs with stapled anastomoses. The data suggest that an anterior resection in low colorectal anastomosis can be done safely after low-dose radiation using either handsewn or stapling techniques.     

A new three-layer-funnel-shaped esophagogastric anastomosis for surgical treatment of esophageal carcinoma

AIM: To reduce the incidence of postoperative anastomoticleak, stenosis, gastroesophageal reflux (GER) for patientswith esophageal carcinoma, and to evaluate the conventionalmethod of esophagectomy and esophagogastroplastymodified by a new three-layer-funnel-shaped (TLF)esophagogastric anastomotic suturing technique.METHODS: From January 1997 to October 1999, patientswith clinical stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ (Ⅱa and Ⅱb) esophagealcarcinoma, which met the enrollment criteria, were surgicallytreated by the new method (Group A) and by conventionaloperation (Group B). All the patients were followed at leastfor 6 months. Postoperative outcomes and complicationswere recorded and compared with the conventional methodin the same hospitals and with that reported previously byMcLarty etalin 1997 (Group C).RESULTS: 58 cases with stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ (Ⅱa and Ⅱb)esophageal carcinoma, including 38 males and 20 femalesaged from 34 to 78 (mean age: 57), were surgically treatedby the TLF anastomosis and 64 by conventional method inour hospitals from January 1997 to October 1999. The qualityof swallowing was improved significantly (Wilcoxon W＝2 142,P＝0.0 001) 2 to 3 months after the new operation in GroupA. Only one patient had a blind anastomatic fistula diagnosedby barium swallow test 2 months but healed up 3 weekslater. Postoperative complications occurred in 25 (43 %)patients, anastomotic stenosis in 8 (14 %), and GER in 13(22 %). The incidences of postoperative anastomotic leak,stenosis and GER were significantly decreased by the TLFanastomosis method compared with that of conventionalmethods (x2＝6.566, P ＝0.038; x2＝10.214, P＝ 0.006;x2＝21.265, P＝0.000).CONCLUSION: The new three-layer-funnel-shapedesophagogastric anastomosis (TLFEGA) hasmore advantagesto reduce postoperative complications of anastomotic leak,stricture and GER.     

Compression anastomosis clip for gastrointestinal anastomosis

AIM： To investigate the feasibility of compression anastomosis clip （CAC） for gastrointestinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction. METHODS： Sixty-six patients undergoing gastrointestinal anastomosis proximal to the ileocecal junction were randomized into two groups according to the anastomotic method, CAC or stapler. RESULTS： The postoperative recovery of patients in CAC and stapled anastomosis groups was similar. No postoperative complication related to the anastomotic method was found in either group. Both upper gastrointestinal contrast radiography at the early postoperative course and endoscopic examination after a 6-mo follow-up showed a better healing at the compression anastomosis. CONCLUSION： CAC can be used not only in colonic surgery but also in gastrointestinal anastomosis. Our result strongly suggests that CAC anastomosis is safe in various complication circumstances. However, it should be further confirmed with a larger patient sample.     

Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To compare the outcomes of hand-sewn (HS) and linearly stapled (LS) esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer.METHODS: Before beginning this study, a rigorous protocol was established according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration. Databases and references were searched for all randomized controlled trials and comparative clinical studies that compared LS with HS esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer. The primary outcomes compared were anastomotic leak and stricture. Subgroup analyses were performed according to site of anastomosis.RESULTS: Fifteen studies were used, comprising 3203 patients (n = 2027 LS and 1176 HS). Primary outcome analysis revealed a significant decrease in anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.41-0.65; P < 0.00001) associated with LS anastomosis. A significantly reduced rate of anastomotic stricture associated with LS was also found (RR = 0.56, 95%CI: 0.49-0.64; P < 0.00001). A subgroup analysis according to the site of anastomosis revealed a significantly reduced rate of anastomotic stricture (P < 0.00001). Although there was no significant difference in the decrease in thoracic anastomotic leakage, there was a significant decrease in cervical anastomotic leakage associated with LS (P < 0.00001).CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that the LS technique contributes to a reduced rate of leakage and stricture compared with the HS method.     

Preventing and localizing esophagogastric anastomosis leakage by sleeve-wrapping of the pedicled omentum

AIM:To develop a technique of sleeve-wrapping thepedicled omentum around the esophagogastric anastomosis for preventing and localizing leakage.METHODS:This study includes data from 86 patientswho were diagnosed with esophageal cancer and underwent the technique of sleeve-wrapping the pedicledomentum around esophagogastric anastomosis afteresophagectomy between November 2011 and July 2013.The early complications that occurred during follow-upwere analyzed.RESULTS:Postoperative complications included pulmonary complications(13/86;15.1%)and abdominal orthoracic wound infection(3/86;3.5%).Complicationsthat occurred during follow-up included one case ofanastomosis leakage(limited by omentum;1.2%)andfive case of anastomosis stricture(5.8%).No deathsoccurred.All complications were resolved through traditional treatment.No additional surgery was needed.CONCLUSION:Sleeve-wrapping of the pedicled omentum around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy is safe and effective for preventing and localizing anastomosis leakage without increasing anastomosis stricture.     

Combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophagectomy and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomsis

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 112 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma and gastro-esophageal anastomosis in right thoracic cavity from October 2011 to June 2013. First, the gastric tube was created with the aid of linear stapling device by removing the stomach and dissecting lymph nodes under laparoscopy and making a 3-4 cm incision through the subxiphoid area in the upper abdomen. Second, the thoracic esophagus and lymph nodes were dissected during thoracoscopic procedure. Gastric tube was inserted into the chest cavity and placed in the posterior mediastinum. The thoracic gastro-esophageal anastomosis was stapled with a circular stapler. Combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophagectomy and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is technically feasible and safe, with minimized trauma, less operative blood loss and quick recovery.KEYWORDS : Laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, esophagectomy, esophagogastric anastomosis, esophageal carcinoma     

Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum

INTRODUCTION: Between 1985 and 1996, 190 patients underwent a low anterior rectal resection with coloanal anastomosis for adenocarcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. METHODS: This article reports on 31 (17 males) of these patients with a very low localization of the tumor (distal tumor margin 1.3±0.9 cm above the dentate line). If the function of the sphincter was acceptable and we could exclude tumor infiltration into the sphincter through endosonography, we relocated the resection plane distally into the intersphincteric region to attain an acceptable margin of safety. In all of these cases, it was impossible for us to perform the usual surgical procedure of a mechanical anastomosis by means of a circular stapler. After intersphincteric rectal resection, the anastomosis was handsewn, using interrupted sutures from the perineal approach, 2.5 to 3 cm above the anal verge, implementing Parks' retractor. A protective stoma was performed in all cases. All data were documented prospectively. RESULTS: Complications: Postoperative mortality was 0 percent. Postoperatively, none of the patients showed an indication for relaparotomy. The leakage rate was 48 percent. Only 16 percent later needed additional surgery for anastomotic strictures or for rectovaginal fistulas. Long-term observations showed that the anastomosis healed well in 27 patients (87.1 percent). Four patients (12.9 percent) decided to have a terminal colostomy performed (anastomotic stricture, 3 patients; anorectal incontinence, 1 patient). Follow-up: During the follow-up period of 6.8±3.7 years, six patients (19.4 percent) developed a tumor progression (9.7 percent local recurrences and 12.9 percent distant spread). The five-year survival rate was 79 percent (Dukes A, 100 percent (n=18); Dukes B, 67 percent (n=4); and Dukes C, 44 percent (n=9)). Continence: One-third of patients developed anorectal incontinence for liquid (29.6 percent) or solid stool (3.7 percent). Average stool frequency was 3.3 times per day. Resting pressure decreased significantly by 29 percent (preoperative, 105±37 cm H₂O and postoperative, 75±19 cm H₂O;P<0.05), whereas squeeze pressure did not change. CONCLUSION: In selected patients with tumors close to the dentate line, an intersphincteric resection of the rectum may help to avoid an abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with a terminal stoma, without any curtailemtn of oncologic standards. A protective stoma for three months is advantageous.