Mechanisms of electrode fold-over in cochlear implant surgery when using a flexible and slim perimodiolar electrode array

Objectives: This study evaluates the design of a thin perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode array (CI532) and assesses insertion-related rotation and fold-over.

Methods: The study consisted on a cochlear model and temporal bone insertion studies. Twenty insertions were studied, under four different surgical insertion conditions in vitro, the intracochlear disposition of the electrode array and presence of tip fold over were recorded. Also, eight fresh human temporal bones were studied after insertion in two conditions: correct alignment of the electrode array during the insertion and misaligned. These surgical situations were investigated within this study using a video recording of the dynamics of insertion techniques and X-ray, including fluoroscopy, Cone Beam CT, and digital imaging analysis.

Results: For electrodes inserted with a correct surgical technique, the placement was perfect, within the scala tympani. The wrapping factor was 0.53, and the perimodiolar distance was below 0.3?mm, with a mean insertion depth of 405°.

Conclusions: A perimodiolar position can be achieved with the new CI532 electrode array. The new electrode also seems to be reliable for atraumatic intracochlear placement in scala tympani (ST).     

Intracochle?re Elektrodenlage

Introduction

Due to the increasing number of cochlear implantations (CI), postoperative radiological verification of the electrode position, e.g., with respect to quality control, plays a central role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracochlear position of deep inserted electrodes by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Materials and methods

CBCT data sets (Accu-I-tomo, Morita, Kyoto, Japan) of 22?patients (28?ears operated between 2008 and 2011) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent a CI (round window approach) with deep insertion of the electrode (Flex soft or standard electrode from MedEl?). CBCT data were analyzed for intracochlear position of the electrode (scala vestibuli, scala tympani, malposition between the scalae) and the certainty of this evaluation.

Results

All ears could be evaluated with the status certain or relatively certain in the basal turn of the cochlea. Thereby, the electrode array was inserted into the scala tympani in 93% (n?=?26). Primary insertion into the scala vestibuli and the scala media was observed in 3.5% of the ears, respectively. In the apical part of the cochlea, only 32% (n?=?9 ears) could be evaluated with relative certainty. The remaining 68% of cases could not be evaluated. Of the 32% interpretable cases in the apical part of the cochlea, 25% (n?=?7) were inserted into the scala tympani, 3.5% (n?=?1) into the scala vestibuli, and 3.5% (n?=?1) were malpositioned between the scalae.

Conclusion

The exact evaluation of the intracochlear position of the electrode by CBCT is only possible in the basal turn of the cochlea. In deep insertion, determination of the position in the medial and apical parts of the cochlea by CBCT is still not possible. Furthermore, the round window approach allows reliable implantation into the scala tympani.     

Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?

CONCLUSIONS: Except for basal cochlear traumatization, all specimens implanted into scala tympani showed atraumatic insertion properties and good perimodiolar electrode positioning. Cochleostomy preparation and placement can have a significant impact on levels of basal cochlear trauma. OBJECTIVE: In the past, perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes increased the risk for intracochlear traumatization when compared to free-fitting arrays. Recently, however, clinical evidence for atraumatic perimodiolar implantations with preservation of residual hearing has been described. The aim of this paper was to histologically evaluate a perimodiolar cochlear implant array for its insertion properties in cadaver human temporal bones. Surgical and electrode factors, as well as preparation artifacts influencing intracochlear trauma, were considered in the evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen human temporal bones were harvested up to 24 hours post mortem and implanted immediately with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant electrode array. Implantations were either performed using a regular caudal approach cochleostomy or through the round window membrane. After implantation, all bones underwent special histological processing, which allowed sectioning of undecalcified bone. Insertion properties were evaluated according to a grading system. RESULTS: Fourteen specimens were implanted into scala tympani and only two exhibited basal trauma attributable to electrode insertion characteristics. Two bones were implanted into scala vestibuli after causing trauma in the region of the cochleostomy. Insertion depths ranged from 180 degrees to 400 degrees. All bones showed good perimodiolar electrode positioning. Basal trauma due to surgical issues and histological artifacts was present in 10 of 16 bones.     

Math1基因内耳导入径路的探索研究

目的研究腺病毒携带Math1-EGFP基因经完整圆窗膜途径及鼓阶打孔途径导入耳蜗后对听功能和转导效率的影响,为内耳基因治疗提供实验基础和理论依据。方法健康成年白色红目豚鼠40只,雌雄不限,体重250—300g。随机分成四组,完整圆窗膜组12只,鼓阶打孔组12只,各组分别设对照8只。实验组（24只）导入重组腺病毒携带的Math1基因及增强型绿色荧光蛋白基因（enhanced green fluorescent protein,EGFP）,对照组（16只）导入人工外淋巴液,所有动物均以左耳作为导入耳。术前及术后分别行听性脑干反应（ABR）检查。分别于术后5天、14天取双侧耳蜗标本做基底膜铺片观察基因表达情况。结果完整圆窗膜组导入耳ABR阈值,术后5天各频率与术前比较无显著性差异（P〉0．05）;鼓阶打孔组导入耳ABR阈值,术后5天在2kHz、4kHz与术前比较无差异（P〉0．05）,8kHz较术前增高（P〈0．05）,16kHz、20kHz较术前明显增高（P〈0．01）,术后14天在16kHz、20kHz较术后5天时明显好转（P〈0．01）,但较术前仍有增高（P〈0．05）。转导成功率鼓阶打孔组为91．6％,优于完整圆窗膜组的50％。两种转导途径对目的基因在耳蜗内的表达部位和表达时间没有显著影响。结论完整圆窗膜途径及鼓阶打孔途径在转导成功率及听功能保护方面各有优劣。完整圆窗膜途径因其对耳蜗的损伤极小,在临床应用方面具有更好的发展前景。     

Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the intracochlear position and the extent of trauma to cochlear structures using a new prototype electrode carrier (Flex EAS). Special emphasis was placed on the practicality for combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system. STUDY DESIGN: Human temporal bones were evaluated histologically after insertion of the electrodes, and insertion forces were measured in an acrylic model of the scala tympani. METHODS: 1) Insertion forces with the regular C40+ array and the new electrode prototype were measured in an acrylic model of the scala tympani. 2) Ten human temporal bones were implanted using the same surgical procedure as in vivo. All bones underwent fixation methylmethacrylate embedding to allow cutting of the undecalcified bone with the electrode in situ. In addition, radiography of the implanted devices was performed and correlated to histologic results. Electrode positions and trauma to cochlear structures were then evaluated histologically. RESULTS: All insertions of the new electrode array were performed in the scala tympani of the cochlea. All insertions were atraumatic and covered one cochlear turn. The only effect on cochlear structures that could be observed was a slight lifting of the basilar membrane in the middle turn limited to the tip of the electrode. In three bones, basal trauma, which resulted from the cochleostomy itself, could be observed as well. All neural structures remained intact. CONCLUSIONS: The new electrode prototype provides very good mechanical properties for safe and atraumatic implantation. All criteria for the use in hearing-preservation cochlear implantation for electric and acoustic stimulation were fulfilled. Surgical measures to prevent basal trauma appear to be very important.     

Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: clinical experience using 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To use the improved resolution available with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in vivo to localize the cochlear implant electrode array within the basal turn. STUDY DESIGN: Sixty-four-slice MDCT examinations of the temporal bones were retrospectively reviewed in 17 patients. Twenty-three implants were evaluated. SETTING: Tertiary referral facility. PATIENTS: All patients with previous cochlear implantation evaluated at our center between January 2004 and March 2006 were offered a computed tomographic examination as part of the study. In addition, preoperative computed tomographic examinations in patients being evaluated for a second bilateral device were included. INTERVENTION: Sixty-four-slice MDCT examination of the temporal bones. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Localization of the electrode array within the basal turn from multiplanar reconstructions of the cochlea. RESULTS: Twenty-three implants were imaged in 17 patients. We were able to localize the electrode array within the scala tympani within the basal turn in 10 implants. In 3 implants, the electrode array was localized to the scala vestibuli. Migration of the electrode array from scala tympani to scala vestibuli was observed in three implants. Of the 7 implants in which localization of the electrode array was indeterminate, all had disease entities that obscured the definition of the normal cochlear anatomy. CONCLUSIONS: Sixty-four-slice MDCT with multiplanar reconstructions of the postoperative cochlea after cochlear implantation allows for accurate localization of the electrode array within the basal turn where normal cochlear anatomy is not obscured by the underlying disease process. Correlating the position of the electrode in the basal turn with surgical technique and implant design could be helpful in improving outcomes.     

Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the intracochlear electrode position in using rotational tomography in adult cochlear implant patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eighteen adult patients being implanted either with a Nucleus straight electrode array or a Contour electrode with a total of 22 implanted ears. Preoperative computed tomography had been without evidence for obliteration, ossification, or malformation of the cochlea. INTERVENTION: Rotational tomography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The intracochlear electrode position was evaluated with regard to scala tympani, scala vestibuli, and a dislocation from one scala to the other. The intraoperative procedure was compared with the electrode position by analyzing the operating reports. RESULTS: Preliminary results indicate, respectively, that there is a higher incidence of intracochlear trauma in using the Contour electrode array than expected with a more frequent dislocation of electrode arrays from scala tympani to scala vestibuli and that there is a higher rate of scala vestibuli insertions. CONCLUSIONS: The impact of these findings may influence further developments of electrode arrays as well as surgical techniques for implantation.     

Evaluation of the HiFocus electrode array with positioner in human temporal bones

The aim of the study presented was to assess the insertion mode and possible intracochlear trauma after implantation of the HiFocus electrode with positioner in human temporal bones. The study was performed in five freshly frozen temporal bones. The position of electrodes was evaluated using conventional X-ray analysis, rotational tomography and histomorphological analysis. Insertion of the HiFocus electrode with positioner resulted in considerable trauma to fine cochlear structures including fracture of the osseous spiral lamina, dislocation of the electrode array from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli and fracture of the modiolus close to the cochleostomy. The implication of the results regarding clinical outcome will be discussed.     

Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the variance in cochlear implant electrode insertion depth in degrees around the modiolus (angular insertion depth) in free-fitting and perimodiolar electrode arrays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight fresh human temporal bones were implanted with free-fitting cochlear implant electrodes, and 18 bones were implanted using perimodiolar electrode arrays. Specimens were embedded, and 2-dimensional radiographs were obtained to assess angular insertion depths. Histologic serial sections of undecalcified bones were then evaluated to analyze intracochlear electrode positions. Finally, linear surgical insertion depths (in millimeters) were correlated with angular insertion depth (degrees around the modiolus). RESULTS: A moderate variance of angular insertion depth was documented for both free-fitting and perimodiolar electrode arrays. Full insertions into the scala tympani ranged from 540 to 630 degrees with free-fitting arrays and from 270 to 375 degrees with perimodiolar electrodes. In free-fitting devices, a linear relationship between linear (in millimeters) and angular (degrees) insertion depths was observed. Insertions into scala vestibuli were observed in 9 of 28 and 5 of 18 of the specimens for free-fitting and perimodiolar electrodes, respectively. Additionally, scala vestibuli insertions showed greater angular insertion depths when compared with scala tympani implantations. CONCLUSION: Variances in angular insertion depths seem to be moderate and similar in free-fitting and perimodiolar electrode arrays. Scala vestibuli insertions showed greater angular insertion depths than comparable insertions into the scala tympani. In perimodiolar electrodes, angular insertion depths equal or greater than 390 degrees suggested scala vestibuli placement.     

Surgical implications of perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode design: avoiding intracochlear damage and scala vestibuli insertion

Abstract

Objective To review the mechanisms and nature of intracochlear damage associated with cochlear implant electrode array insertion, in particular, the various perimodiolar electrode designs. Make recommendations regarding surgical techniques for the Nucleus Contour electrode to ensure correct position and minimal insertion trauma.

Background The potential advantages of increased modiolar proximity of intracochlear multichannel electrode arrays are a reduction in stimulation thresholds, an increase in dynamic range and more localized neural excitation. This may improve speech perception and reduce power consumption. These advantages may be negated if increased intracochlear damage results from the method used to position the electrodes close to the modiolus.

Method A review of the University of Melbourne Department of Otolaryngology experience with temporal bone safety studies using the Nucleus standard straight electrode array and a variety of perimodiolar electrode array designs; comparison with temporal bone insertion studies from other centres and postmortem histopathology studies reported in the literature. Review of our initial clinical experience using the Nucleus Contour electrode array.

Results The nature of intracochlear damage resulting from electrode insertion trauma ranges from minor, localized, spiral ligament tear to diffuse organ of Corti disruption and osseous spiral lamina fracture. The type of damage depends on the mechanical characteristics of the electrode array, the stiffness, curvature and size of the electrode in relation to the scala, and the surgical technique. The narrow, flexible, straight arrays are the least traumatic. Pre-curved or stiffer arrays are associated with an incidence of basilar membrane perforation. The cochleostomy must be correctly sited in relation to the round window to ensure scala tympani insertion. A cochleostomy anterior to the round window rather than inferior may lead to scala media or scala vestibuli insertion.

Conclusion Proximity of electrodes to the modiolus can be achieved without intracochlear damage provided the electrode array is a free fit within the scala, of appropriate size and shape, and accurate scala tympani insertion is performed.     

Scalar localization of the electrode array after cochlear implantation: a cadaveric validation study comparing 64-slice multidetector computed tomography with microcomputed tomography.

HYPOTHESIS: Improved resolution available with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) could potentially be used clinically to localize the cochlear implant (CI) electrode array within the basal turn. BACKGROUND: In CI surgery, the electrode array should be inserted into and remain within the scala tympani to avoid injury to Reissner's membrane and the scala media. Correlating the position of the electrode in the basal turn with surgical technique and implant design could be helpful in improving outcomes. METHODS: After a standard left mastoid exposure of the round window niche through the facial recess performed on a cadaver head, an electrode array from a Nucleus Softip Contour CI was fully inserted through a cochleostomy. The head was then scanned axially on a 64-slice MDCT with 0.4-mm slice thickness and reconstructed into the oblique axial, oblique coronal, and oblique sagittal planes of the cochlea. The temporal bone was then harvested and imaged on a microcomputed tomographic scanner using 20-microm slice thickness. Identical reconstructions were made and compared with the 64-slice images to confirm exact location of the electrode array. RESULTS: The 64-slice MDCT accurately localized the electrode array to the scala tympani. This was best demonstrated in the oblique sagittal plane, identifying the electrode array in the posterior inferior portion of the basal turn, posterior to the spiral lamina. CONCLUSION: This ex vivo validation study suggests that 64-slice MDCT has the potential to allow accurate localization of the CI electrode array within the basal turn of the cochlea.     

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy with short duration intratympanic steroid therapy for sudden hearing loss

Conclusions. Except for basal cochlear traumatization, all specimens implanted into scala tympani showed atraumatic insertion properties and good perimodiolar electrode positioning. Cochleostomy preparation and placement can have a significant impact on levels of basal cochlear trauma. Objective. In the past, perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes increased the risk for intracochlear traumatization when compared to free-fitting arrays. Recently, however, clinical evidence for atraumatic perimodiolar implantations with preservation of residual hearing has been described. The aim of this paper was to histologically evaluate a perimodiolar cochlear implant array for its insertion properties in cadaver human temporal bones. Surgical and electrode factors, as well as preparation artifacts influencing intracochlear trauma, were considered in the evaluation. Materials and methods. Sixteen human temporal bones were harvested up to 24 hours post mortem and implanted immediately with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant electrode array. Implantations were either performed using a regular caudal approach cochleostomy or through the round window membrane. After implantation, all bones underwent special histological processing, which allowed sectioning of undecalcified bone. Insertion properties were evaluated according to a grading system. Results. Fourteen specimens were implanted into scala tympani and only two exhibited basal trauma attributable to electrode insertion characteristics. Two bones were implanted into scala vestibuli after causing trauma in the region of the cochleostomy. Insertion depths ranged from 180° to 400°. All bones showed good perimodiolar electrode positioning. Basal trauma due to surgical issues and histological artifacts was present in 10 of 16 bones.     

Depth and quality of electrode insertion: a radiologic and pitch scaling assessment of two cochlear implant systems

OBJECTIVE: To compare the depth of electrode insertion in two types of cochlear implants, and to assess the ability of the implantees in each group to place-pitch during random electrical stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective clinical study. SETTING: This study was performed at an implant program within a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Five consecutive patients with the Clarion (Advanced Bionics, Symlar, CA, U.S.A.) device and 5 with the Nucleus-22 (Cochlear Corporation, Sydney, Australia) implants were enrolled. All 10 implantees had fully active and functioning electrodes. INTERVENTIONS: The depth of insertion was determined using plain anteroposterior skull film and high resolution computed tomography (CT). The quality of electrode insertion was assessed by pitch scaling; electrodes were randomly stimulated to generate subjective pitch responses. OUTCOME MEASURES: The depth of electrode insertion was measured radiographically as degrees of angular rotation within the cochlea. For pitch scaling, the averaged responses to electrical stimulation was plotted against the "place" of the electrodes along the array. Pitch range, plateauing, and reversal of pitches were also noted. Insertion depth was correlated with the result of pitch scaling and open-set speech discrimination at 3 months. RESULTS: The mean insertion depth was 406 degrees for the Clarion device and 254 degrees for the Nucleus device. CT was used to confirm the intracochlear placement of the electrodes and their relationships to the cochleostomy site. It did not confer more information than the plain films unless kinking had occurred. Pitch perception was consistent with the tonotopic organization of the cochlea. The Nucleus-22 recipients displayed a broader range of pitches with less plateaus and reversals than the Clarion implants. The depth of insertion did not compare well with the outcome of pitch scaling or with open-set speech discrimination scores in either group of implantees. CONCLUSION: The preformed spiral array of the Clarion device allowed deeper electrode insertion compared to the Nucleus-22 device. However, depth of insertion did not translate into better pitch placement.     

A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: electrophysiologic effects

HYPOTHESIS: It was postulated that an electrode array that achieved a close modiolar proximity would result in reduced threshold levels and amplitude slopes, as measured with electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). BACKGROUND: Quality and quantity of auditory information transmitted by a cochlear implant to patients with sensorineural hearing loss depend on spatial and temporal resolution achieved by the electrical intracochlear stimulation. METHODS: To improve spatial resolution, a new electrode system was developed by Advanced Bionics Corp., with the intention of obtaining greater modiolar proximity. The implant version specified for animal experiments consists of a straight electrode array of seven embedded platinum discs and a so-called Silastic-positioner. The Silastic positioner is shaped to follow the dimensions of the scala tympani with a concave (triangular) inner side, which fits the form of the electrode array. The aim of the study was to evaluate the influence of a modiolus-hugging electrode position in contrast to a conventional electrode position on EABR in short-term animal experiments. Short-term electrophysiologic studies were performed on six adult cats. After local intracochlear application of neomycin solution (50 mg/mL), electrodes were inserted into the scala tympani. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response threshold levels and EABR amplitude slopes were systematically investigated with and without the positioner. RESULTS: Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response measurements revealed a distinct apicobasal threshold shift, with increasing thresholds toward the basal end of the electrode. After insertion of the positioner, this shift diminished or was inverted and EABR thresholds and amplitude slopes were reduced significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Threshold and amplitude slope data emphasize the functional benefit of the positioner system, especially for the stimulation of electrodes in the more basal channels.     

Perimodiolar electrodes in cochlear implant surgery

Perimodiolar-positioned cochlear implant electrodes have been developed in order to bring the electrode contacts as close as possible to the spiral ganglion cells, which are the target of electrostimulation. This results in lower electrical thresholds, higher dynamic ranges and less channel interaction when compared with normal implant electrodes which are usually located peripherally within the scala tympani. In this study we evaluated 4 different types of perimodiolar electrode: the Clarion Preformed electrode, the Clarion Preformed electrode with positioner, the Nucleus Contour electrode and the Med-El Perimodiolar Combi 40 electrode. These devices require different approaches to achieve a perimodiolar electrode position. The electrodes were inserted in fresh human temporal bones. After processing these bones with the electrodes in situ by employing a sawing, grinding and polishing technique, the inner ear structures as well as the electrode positions could be evaluated in detail. All electrode types studied had a more or less perimodiolar position; however, each type produced a certain amount of trauma to cochlear structures which is discussed in relation to mechanical properties. Further human temporal bone studies with improved perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes are necessary in order to find an optimized type of electrode.     

Evaluating cochlear implant trauma to the scala vestibuli

Objectives: Placement of cochlear implant electrodes into the scala vestibuli may be intentional, e.g. in case of blocked scala tympani or unintentional as a result of trauma to the basilar membrane or erroneous location of the cochieostomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the morphological consequences and cochlear trauma after implantation of different cochlear implant electrode arrays in the scala vestibuli. Design: Human temporal bone study with histological and radiological evaluation. Setting: Twelve human cadaver temporal bones were implanted with different cochlear implant electrodes. Implanted bones were processed using a special method to section undecalcified bone. Main outcome measures: Cochlear trauma and intracochlear positions. Results: All implanted electrodes were implanted into the scala vestibuli using a special approach that allows direct scala vestibuli insertions. Fractures of the osseous spiral lamina were evaluated in some bones in the basal cochlear regions. In most electrodes, delicate structures of the organ of Corti were left intact, however, Reissner's membrane was destroyed in all specimens and the electrode lay upon the tectorial membrane. In some bones the organ of Corti was destroyed. Conclusions: Scala vestibuli insertions did not cause severe trauma to osseous or neural structures, thus preserving the basis for electrostimulation of the cochlea. However, destruction of Reissner's membrane and impact on the Organ of Corti can be assumed to destroy residual hearing.     

Evaluation of the insertion-trauma of the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode-array in a human temporal bone model

BACKGROUND: The development of intracochlear electrode arrays is aiming at a placement close to the modiolus with an insertion as atraumatic as possible. A new perimodiolar electrode model the Nucleus Contour Advance was to be evaluated regarding the possible intracochlear trauma. METHODS: The implantation of the Contour Advance electrode was performed in 11 frozen native temporal bones. Beneath a regular insertion in 5 temporal bones in 6 cases the insertion was carried out using the "advance-off-stylett" technique with a fixed stylett. The temporal bones were embedded in metacrylate based resin for histomorphological evaluation. The evaluation was performed regarding to the intracochlear placement close to the modiolus and the damage to intracochlear fine structures (basilar membrane, osseus spiral lamina). RESULTS: In 2 out of 11 cases we found a perforation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli independent of the insertion-technique. A severe intracochlear trauma was observed in one case with fracture of osseus spiral lamina using the AOS-technique. A close position to the modiolus could be achieved by insertion the scala tympani without perforation of the basilar membrane. CONCLUSIONS: The Nucleus Contour Advance electrode array showed minimal trauma in human temporal bones by using a standard insertion technique. By using the freehand AOS-technique a severe cochlear trauma is possible. Therefore further development in electrode design and the use of an insertion-tool is recommended.     

Perimodiolar Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Surgery

Perimodiolar-positioned cochlear implant electrodes have been developed in order to bring the electrode contacts as close as possible to the spiral ganglion cells, which are the target of electrostimulation. This results in lower electrical thresholds, higher dynamic ranges and less channel interaction when compared with normal implant electrodes which are usually located peripherally within the scala tympani. In this study we evaluated 4 different types of perimodiolar electrode: the Clarion Preformed electrode, the Clarion Preformed electrode with positioner, the Nucleus Contour electrode and the Med-El Perimodiolar Combi 40 electrode. These devices require different approaches to achieve a perimodiolar electrode position. The electrodes were inserted in fresh human temporal bones. After processing these bones with the electrodes in situ by employing a sawing, grinding and polishing technique, the inner ear structures as well as the electrode positions could be evaluated in detail. All electrode types studied had a more or less perimodiolar position; however, each type produced a certain amount of trauma to cochlear structures which is discussed in relation to mechanical properties. Further human temporal bone studies with improved perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes are necessary in order to find an optimized type of electrode.     

Cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array using the 2-deoxyglucose technique.

The 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) technique was used to study the cochleotopic selectivity of a multichannel scala tympani electrode array in four cats with another acting as an unstimulated control. Each animal was unilaterally deafened and a multichannel electrode array inserted 6 mm into the scala tympani. Thresholds to electrical stimulation were determined by recording electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). Each animal was injected with 2-DG, and electrically stimulated using bipolar electrodes located either distal or proximal to the round window. The contralateral ear was stimulated with acoustic tone pips at frequencies that matched the electrode place. Stimulation of both distal and proximal bipolar electrodes at 3 x EABR threshold, evoked localized 2-DG labelling in both ipsilateral cochlear nucleus (CN) and the contralateral inferior colliculus (IC), which was very similar in orientation and breadth to labelling evoked by the contralateral tone pips. The cochleotopic position of labelling to proximal stimulation was located in the 24-26 kHz region of each structure, whereas the distal labelling was located around 12 kHz. Distal stimulation at 10 x EABR threshold produced very broad 2-DG labelling in IC centered around the 12 kHz place. The present 2-DG results clearly illustrate cochleotopic selectivity using multichannel bipolar scala tympani electrodes. The extent of this selectivity is dependent on electrical stimulus levels. The 2-DG technique has great potential in evaluating the efficacy of new electrode array designs.     

Assessing the Electrode-Neuron Interface with the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential,Electrode Position,and Behavioral Thresholds

Variability in speech perception scores among cochlear implant listeners may largely reflect the variable efficacy of implant electrodes to convey stimulus information to the auditory nerve. In the present study, three metrics were applied to assess the quality of the electrode-neuron interface of individual cochlear implant channels: the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP), the estimation of electrode position using computerized tomography (CT), and behavioral thresholds using focused stimulation. The primary motivation of this approach is to evaluate the ECAP as a site-specific measure of the electrode-neuron interface in the context of two peripheral factors that likely contribute to degraded perception: large electrode-to-modiolus distance and reduced neural density. Ten unilaterally implanted adults with Advanced Bionics HiRes90k devices participated. ECAPs were elicited with monopolar stimulation within a forward-masking paradigm to construct channel interaction functions (CIF), behavioral thresholds were obtained with quadrupolar (sQP) stimulation, and data from imaging provided estimates of electrode-to-modiolus distance and scalar location (scala tympani (ST), intermediate, or scala vestibuli (SV)) for each electrode. The width of the ECAP CIF was positively correlated with electrode-to-modiolus distance; both of these measures were also influenced by scalar position. The ECAP peak amplitude was negatively correlated with behavioral thresholds. Moreover, subjects with low behavioral thresholds and large ECAP amplitudes, averaged across electrodes, tended to have higher speech perception scores. These results suggest a potential clinical role for the ECAP in the objective assessment of individual cochlear implant channels, with the potential to improve speech perception outcomes.