Correlation of tumour BRAF mutations and MLH1 methylation with germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation status: a literature review assessing utility of tumour features for MMR variant classification

Colorectal cancer (CRC) that demonstrates microsatellite instability (MSI) is caused by either germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations, or 'sporadic' somatic tumour MLH1 promoter methylation. MLH1 promoter methylation is reportedly correlated with tumour BRAF V600E mutation status. No systematic review has been undertaken to assess the value of BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation tumour markers as negative predictors of germline MMR mutation status. A literature review of CRC cohorts tested for MMR mutations, and tumour BRAF V600E mutation and/or MLH1 promoter methylation was conducted using PubMed. Studies were assessed for tumour features, stratified by tumour MMR status based on immunohistochemistry or MSI where possible. Pooled frequencies and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. BRAF V600E results for 4562 tumours from 35 studies, and MLH1 promoter methylation results for 2975 tumours from 43 studies, were assessed. In 550 MMR mutation carriers, the BRAF V600E mutation frequency was 1.40% (95% CI 0.06% to 3%). In MMR mutation-negative cases, the BRAF V600E mutation frequency was 5.00% (95% CI 4% to 7%) in 1623 microsatellite stable (MSS) cases and 63.50% (95% CI 47% to 79%) in 332 cases demonstrating MLH1 methylation or MLH1 expression loss. MLH1 promoter methylation of the 'A region' was reported more frequently than the 'C region' in MSS CRCs (17% vs 0.06%, p<0.0001) and in MLH1 mutation carriers (42% vs 6%, p<0.0001), but not in MMR mutation-negative MSI-H CRCs (40% vs 47%, p=0.12). Methylation of the 'C region' was a predictor of MMR mutation-negative status in MSI-H CRC cases (47% vs 6% in MLH1 mutation carriers, p<0.0001). This review demonstrates that tumour BRAF V600E mutation, and MLH1 promoter 'C region' methylation specifically, are strong predictors of negative MMR mutation status. It is important to incorporate these features in multifactorial models aimed at predicting MMR mutation status.     

BRAF V600E mutation detection by immunohistochemistry in colorectal carcinoma

The serine/threonine‐protein kinase B‐raf (BRAF) is an oncogene mutated in various neoplasms, including 5–15% of colorectal carcinomas. The T1799A point mutation, responsible for a large majority of these alterations, results in an amino acid substitution (V600E) causing the constitutive activation of a protein kinase cascade. BRAF V600E in MLH1 deficient tumors implicates somatic tumor‐only methylation of the MLH1 promoter region instead of a germline MLH1 mutation. BRAF V600E also predicts poor prognosis in microsatellite stable colorectal cancers and may be a marker of resistance to anti‐EGFR therapy in metastatic disease. Currently, only molecular methods are available for assessing BRAF mutational status. An immunohistochemical approach is evaluated here. Colon cancers from 2008 to 2012 tested by pyrosequencing for BRAF V600E mutation were selected. A total of 31 tumors with (n = 14) and without (n = 17) the BRAF V600E mutation were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using a commercially available antibody specific to the V600E‐mutated protein. All 14 colorectal carcinomas with the BRAF V600E mutation demonstrated cytoplasmic positivity in tumor cells with the anti‐BRAF antibody. In a minority of cases, staining intensity for the mutated tumor samples was weak (n = 2) or heterogeneous (n = 4); however, the majority of cases showed diffuse, strong cytoplasmic positivity (8 of 14 cases). None of the 17 BRAF wild‐type colorectal cancers showed immunoreactivity to the antibody. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the immunohistochemical BRAF V600E assay was 100%. Detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in colorectal cancer by immunohistochemistry is a viable alternative to molecular methods. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in the analytical algorithm of Lynch syndrome: a cost-effectiveness study

The analytical algorithm of Lynch syndrome (LS) is increasingly complex. BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation have been proposed as a screening tool for the identification of LS. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical usefulness and cost-effectiveness of both somatic alterations to improve the yield of the diagnostic algorithm of LS. A total of 122 colorectal tumors from individuals with family history of colorectal cancer that showed microsatellite instability and/or loss of mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were studied. MMR germline mutations were detected in 57 cases (40 MLH1, 15 MSH2 and 2 MSH6). BRAF V600E mutation was assessed by single-nucleotide primer extension. MLH1 promoter hypermethylation was assessed by methylation-specific multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in a subset of 71 cases with loss of MLH1 protein. A decision model was developed to estimate the incremental costs of alternative case-finding methods for detecting MLH1 mutation carriers. One-way sensitivity analysis was performed to assess robustness of estimations. Sensitivity of the absence of BRAF mutations for depiction of LS patients was 96% (23/24) and specificity was 28% (13/47). Specificity of MLH1 promoter hypermethylation for depiction of sporadic tumors was 66% (31/47) and sensitivity of 96% (23/24). The cost per additional mutation detected when using hypermethylation analysis was lower when compared with BRAF study and germinal MLH1 mutation study. Somatic hypermethylation of MLH1 is an accurate and cost-effective pre-screening method in the selection of patients that are candidates for MLH1 germline analysis when LS is suspected and MLH1 protein expression is absent.     

Molecular assessment of colorectal cancer through Lynch syndrome screening

Since 2017, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended molecular testing of all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) to identify those with suspected Lynch syndrome who should be referred to clinical genetics for germline testing. The pathway involves firstly determining the mismatch repair (MMR) expression status by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or performing microsatellite instability testing. This may be followed by BRAF V600E mutation testing and then MLH1 promoter hypermethylation analysis depending on the result. This approach identifies patients that are most likely to have underlying germline mutations in the MMR genes as opposed to somatic causes of deficient MMR. Here we demonstrate a case with loss of MLH1 protein expression and discuss the subsequent testing strategy according to NICE guidance.     

How and when to search for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer in 2008?

Hereditary non polyposis colorectal cancer or Lynch syndrome is due to germline mutation of one the DNA mismatch repair genes. This mutation is associated with an unstable phenotype in tumor DNA characterized by new microsatellite alleles that are absent in matching normal DNA. Besides the Bethesda reference panel, a new panel of 5 mononucleotide microsatellites (BAT25, BAT26, NR21, NR24, NR27) has been proposed, which is more sensitive and faster to use in a multiplex PCR assay. In tumor cells, immunohistochemistry detects the loss of expression of either MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2 protein, corresponding to the mutated gene. Immunohistochemistry guides germline analysis, except for MLH1 extinction which may correspond to either MLH1 germline mutation or methylation of MLH1 promoter resulting in inactivation. The latter is mostly due to aging and is often associated to the V600E BRAF gene mutation in tumor DNA. Combination of these 3 somatic analyses should reduce indications of germline mutation analysis in Lynch syndrome.     

Histologic features distinguish microsatellite-high from microsatellite-low and microsatellite-stable colorectal carcinomas, but do not differentiate germline mutations from methylation of the MLH1 promoter

The detection of microsatellite-unstable (microsatellite instability [MSI]) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) has prognostic value and can help screen for Lynch syndrome. We determined which histologic features are associated with MSI status and presence of germline mutation and/or methylation of MLH1 promoter. Patients diagnosed with CRC were offered participation in the Columbus-area hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome study regardless of age or family history. Tumors were evaluated for MSI using a modified Bethesda panel of microsatellite markers. Methylation status of the MLH1 promoter was evaluated by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction and bisulfite PCR followed by restriction digestion of tumor DNA. All patients with microsatellite-unstable tumors underwent mutation analysis of the MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes by full sequencing of genomic DNA and by multiplex ligation probe assay of MLH1 and MSH2. Histologic end points were tumor type, grade, percentage of mucin, border, and lymphoid host response. Of the 482 CRCs, 87 were MSI with 69 MSI high (MSI-H), 18 MSI low (MSI-L), and 395 microsatellite stable (MSS). Of 87 MSI tumors, 12 had germline mutations and 34 had methylation of the MLH1 promoter. Younger age, but not histologic features, was significantly associated with a germline mutation. Percentage of mucin, histologic type, grade, and lymphoid host response differed significantly between MSI-H when compared with MSI-L or MSS. No difference was found between MSI-L versus MSS. Histologic features are associated with MSI-H CRC and are helpful to differentiate MSI-H from MSI-L and MSS. These features are not useful to distinguish MSI-L from MSS carcinomas, and those with a deleterious germline hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome mutation from those with methylation of the MLH1 promoter region.     

BRAF screening as a low-cost effective strategy for simplifying HNPCC genetic testing

Background: According to the international criteria for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) diagnostics, cancer patients with a family history or early onset of colorectal tumours showing high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) should receive genetic counselling and be offered testing for germline mutations in DNA repair genes, mainly MLH1 and MSH2. Recently, an oncogenic V600E hotspot mutation within BRAF, a kinase encoding gene from the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway, has been found to be associated with sporadic MSI-H colon cancer, but its association with HNPCC remains to be further clarified.     

Ultra-deep sequencing confirms immunohistochemistry as a highly sensitive and specific method for detecting BRAF V600E mutations in colorectal carcinoma

The activating BRAF ^V600 mutation is a well-established negative prognostic biomarker in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC). A recently developed monoclonal mouse antibody (clone VE1) has been shown to detect reliably BRAF ^V600E mutated protein by immunohistochemistry (IHC). In this study, we aimed to compare the detection of BRAF ^V600E mutations by IHC, Sanger sequencing (SaS), and ultra-deep sequencing (UDS) in CRC. VE1-IHC was established in a cohort of 68 KRAS wild-type CRCs. The VE1-IHC was only positive in the three patients with a known BRAF ^V600E mutation as assessed by SaS and UDS. The test cohort consisted of 265 non-selected, consecutive CRC samples. Thirty-nine out of 265 cases (14.7 %) were positive by VE1-IHC. SaS of 20 randomly selected IHC negative tumors showed BRAF wild-type (20/20). Twenty-four IHC-positive cases were confirmed by SaS (24/39; 61.5 %) and 15 IHC-positive cases (15/39; 38.5 %) showed a BRAF wild-type by SaS. UDS detected a BRAF ^V600E mutation in 13 of these 15 discordant cases. In one tumor, the mutation frequency was below our threshold for UDS positivity, while in another case, UDS could not be performed due to low DNA amount. Statistical analysis showed sensitivities of 100 % and 63 % and specificities of 95 and 100 % for VE1-IHC and SaS, respectively, compared to combined results of SaS and UDS. Our data suggests that there is high concordance between UDS and IHC using the anti-BRAF^V600E (VE1) antibody. Thus, VE1 immunohistochemistry is a highly sensitive and specific method in detecting BRAF ^V600E mutations in colorectal carcinoma.     

The MLH1 -93 G>A promoter polymorphism and genetic and epigenetic alterations in colon cancer

The MLH1 -93 G>A promoter polymorphism has been reported to be associated with an increased risk of microsatellite unstable colorectal cancer. Other than microsatellite instability, however, the genetic and most epigenetic changes of tumors associated with this polymorphism have not been studied. We evaluated associations between the -93 G>A polymorphism and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP), BRAF V600E mutations, and MLH1 methylation in tumors from a sample of 1,211 individuals with colon cancer and 1,968 controls from Utah, Northern California, and Minnesota. The -93 G>A polymorphism was determined by the five prime nuclease assay. CIMP was determined previously by methylation-specific PCR of CpG islands in MLH1, methylated in tumors (MINT)1, MINT2, MINT31, and CDKN2A (p16). The BRAF V600E mutation was determined by sequencing exon 15. The MLH1 -93 G>A promoter polymorphism was associated with CIMP (odds ratio (OR) 3.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85, 6.42), MLH1 methylation (OR 4.16, 95%CI 2.20, 7.86), BRAF mutations (OR 4.26, 95%CI 1.83, 9.91), and older age at diagnosis (OR 3.65, 95%CI 2.08, 6.39) in microsatellite unstable tumors. These associations were not observed in stable tumors. Increased age at diagnosis and tumor characteristics of microsatellite unstable tumors associated with MLH1 -93 G>A suggests the polymorphism is acting at a relatively late stage of colorectal carcinogenesis to drive CIMP+ tumors down the microsatellite instability pathway.     

Novel MLH1 duplication identified in Colombian families with Lynch syndrome

PurposeLynch syndrome accounts for 2–4% of all colorectal cancer, and is mainly caused by germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes. Our aim was to characterize the genetic mutation responsible for Lynch syndrome in an extensive Colombian family and to study its prevalence in Antioquia.MethodsA Lynch syndrome family fulfilling Amsterdam criteria II was studied by immunohistochemistry and by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Results were confirmed by additional independent MLPA, Southern blotting, and sequencing.ResultsIndex case tumor immunohistochemistry results were MLH1−, MSH2+, MSH6+, and PMS2−. MLPA analysis detected a duplication of exons 12 and 13 of MLH1. This mutation was confirmed and characterized precisely to span 4219 base pairs. Duplication screening in this family led to the identification of six additional carriers and 13 noncarriers. We also screened 123 early-onset independent colorectal cancer cases from the same area and identified an additional unrelated carrier.ConclusionA novel duplication of exons 12 and 13 of the MLH1 gene was detected in two independent Lynch syndrome families from Colombia. A putative founder effect and prescreening Lynch syndrome Antioquia families for this specific mutation before thorough mismatch repair mutational screening could be suggested. Genet Med 2011:13(2):155–160.     

An immunohistochemical and genetic study of BRAFV600E mutation in Japanese patients with ameloblastoma

Ameloblastoma is an odontogenic tumor of the jaw. It most frequently occurs in the mandible, and less often in the maxilla. Mandibular ameloblastoma harbors a BRAF mutation that causes a valine (V) to glutamic acid (E) substitution at codon 600 (BRAF^V600E). We examined specimens from 32 Japanese patients to detect the prevalence of the BRAF^V600E mutation, and to evaluate the relationship between immunohistochemical (IHC) expression and genetic results, of BRAF^V600E+ ameloblastoma. Among the 32 cases, 22 (69%) were IHC positive for BRAF^V600E protein, and 10 (31%) were IHC negative; and polymerase chain reaction showed 16 of 21 tested cases (76%) carried the BRAF^V600E mutation. Our findings indicate that that samples that stain IHC positive for BRAF^V600E protein are more likely to carry the BRAF^V600E mutation. These results support assessments for BRAF mutations, and the use of BRAF inhibitors as targeted therapy for ameloblastoma in Japanese patients.     

Coexisting somatic promoter hypermethylation and pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation in Lynch syndrome

Somatic epimutations in the MLH1 promoter mimic the phenotype of Lynch syndrome. To date, no somatic hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter in the carrier of a pathogenic MLH1 germline mutation has been identified, prompting the recommendation that a germline mutation in MLH1 should only be sought in the absence of tumour tissue methylation. We aimed to determine whether methylation of the MLH1 promoter may coexist in carriers of a pathogenic germline mutation in MLH1. We examined the methylation status of the MLH1 promoter in 123 tumour tissue samples, demonstrating high microsatellite instability and loss of expression of a mismatch repair protein (60 cases with MLH1 germline mutation, 25 cases without mutation, 38 cases with MSH2 mutations), using combined bisulphite restriction analysis (COBRA) and SNaPshot analysis. Methylation of the MLH1 promoter was found in two patients with pathogenic germline mutations, one a carrier of a MLH1 mutation and the other a carrier of a MSH2 mutation. Our results demonstrate that methylation of the MLH1 promoter region does not exclude the presence of a germline mutation in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene. Hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter may be present in most cases of sporadic colorectal cancers, but this does not exclude a diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.     

Redundant DNA methylation in colorectal cancers of Lynch-syndrome patients

Lynch syndrome is an inherited disease resulting predominantly in colorectal cancer (CRC). The crucial cause is DNA mismatch repair (MMR) malfunction that is associated mostly with MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations. A significant hallmark of repair defects is a high level of instability in microsatellites (MSI-H). In many sporadic unstable CRCs, the MLH1 gene is inactivated by promoter hypermethylation in addition to extensive promoter methylation in many tumor-suppressor genes known as CpG island methylation phenotype (CIMP). To investigate the possible role of epigenetic alterations in causing MMR deficiency and thereby Lynch syndrome, we evaluated the MLH1 specific and global hypermethylation in hereditary CRCs. Of 22 Lynch-syndrome-related CRCs, 18 (81.8%) demonstrated various levels of DNA methylation; of these, 14 (63.6%) and 4 (18.2%) were methylated in distal and both distal and proximal regions of the MLH1 promoter, respectively. However, only 7/18 (38.9%) of results were confirmed by bisulfite sequencing. Similar methylation patterns in tumors and frequently in matched normal DNA were found in twelve and four patients with MLH1 and MSH2 alterations documented by the absence of protein or presence of germline mutation, respectively. Moreover, the same results were observed in five stable CRCs. None of 22 Lynch-syndrome-related tumors presented CIMP in contrast to 3/10 (30%) stable carcinomas. The rather randomly distributed weak methylation patterns in hereditary CRCs indicate that epigenetic events are redundant in Lynch-syndrome etiology, in contrast to the widespread DNA methylation in sporadic unstable CRCs. These methylation-profile differences can lead to more effective molecular diagnosis of Lynch syndrome.     

Immunohistochemical analysis using a BRAF V600E mutation specific antibody is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of hairy cell leukemia

Hairy cell leukemia (HCL) is usually diagnosed by morphology and flow cytometry studies. However, it is challenging sometimes to distinguish HCL from its mimics. Recently, the BRAF V600E mutation has been described as a disease-defining molecular marker for HCL which is present in nearly all cases of HCL but virtually absent in mimics of HCL. In this study, we investigated the possibility of using immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E mutant protein to differentiate HCL from its mimics. A total of twenty-eight FFPE tissue specimens were studied, including HCL (n=12), HCL variant (HCL-v, n=3), splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL, n=6), and other marginal zone lymphomas (MZL, n=7). Immunohistochemical studies were performed using a mouse monoclonal antibody (clone VE1, Spring Bioscience, CA) specific for BRAF V600E mutation. Molecularly confirmed BRAF V600E mutation positive and negative cases were used as the positive and negative controls respectively. All 12 cases of HCL showed cytoplasmic BRAF V600E protein expression in leukemia cells by immunohistochemical study regardless of tumor burden, whereas all cases of HCL mimics including HCL-v, SMZL, and MZL were negative for BRAF V600E protein. Using this BRAF V600E mutation specific antibody, this immunohistochemical study has 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity for the diagnosis of HCL in our cohort. In conclusion, immunohistochemical detection of the BRAF V600E mutant protein is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of HCL. Compared to PCR or sequencing-based methodologies, immunohistochemistry is a relatively rapid and inexpensive alternative for the differential diagnosis between HCL and its mimics.     

Germline mutation in BRAF codon 600 is compatible with human development: de novo p.V600G mutation identified in a patient with CFC syndrome

Champion KJ, Bunag C, Estep AL, Jones JR, Bolt CH, Rogers RC, Rauen KA, Everman DB. Germline mutation in BRAF codon 600 is compatible with human development: de novo p.V600G mutation identified in a patient with CFC syndrome. BRAF, the protein product of BRAF, is a serine/threonine protein kinase and one of the direct downstream effectors of Ras. Somatic mutations in BRAF occur in numerous human cancers, whereas germline BRAF mutations cause cardio‐facio‐cutaneous (CFC) syndrome. One recurrent somatic mutation, p.V600E, is frequently found in several tumor types, such as melanoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, colon cancer, and ovarian cancer. However, a germline mutation affecting codon 600 has never been described. Here, we present a patient with CFC syndrome and a de novo germline mutation involving codon 600 of BRAF, thus providing the first evidence that a pathogenic germline mutation involving this critical codon is not only compatible with development but can also cause the CFC phenotype. In vitro functional analysis shows that this mutation, which replaces a valine with a glycine at codon 600 (p.V600G), leads to increased ERK and ELK phosphorylation compared to wild‐type BRAF but is less strongly activating than the cancer‐associated p.V600E mutation.     

Densely methylated MLH1 promoter correlates with decreased mRNA expression in sporadic colorectal cancers

It has been reported that MLH1 is silenced by promoter methylation, and that this phenomenon is associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) in sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). To clarify the significance of MLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic CRC, we examined the correlation between methylation status over the entire promoter region and mRNA expression in cases showing high-frequency MSI (MSI-H). MLH1 promoter methylation was analyzed using the bisulfite modification sequencing in 48 MSI-H cases. We also screened for somatic mutation, loss of heterozygosity, and immunohistochemical staining of MLH1. The results showed that methylation patterns could be subdivided into three types: methylation of more than 80% of the CpG sites analyzed (type 1 methylation), methylation of less than 20% (type 2 methylation), and methylation mainly in the region 500 to 921 bases upstream from the translation start site (type 3 methylation). Of the three types, only type 1 methylation correlated with decreased mRNA expression. The frequency of type 1 methylation was significantly higher in cases involving the proximal colon (66.7%, 18/27) compared to that of the distal colon and rectum (23.8%, 5/21, P = 0.004). Immunohistochemical staining of MSI-H cases showed that decreased MLH1 was found in 77.1% (37/48). Of the cases with decreased MLH1, type 1 methylation was present in 59.5% (22/37). Overall, our data suggested that the type 1 methylation pattern may affect MLH1 mRNA expression, such that the majority of MSI-H cases in sporadic CRC, especially proximal colon cancer, exhibited type 1 methylation.     

Further evidence for heritability of an epimutation in one of 12 cases with MLH1 promoter methylation in blood cells clinically displaying HNPCC

Germline mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, tumours with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and loss of MMR protein expression are the hallmarks of HNPCC (Lynch syndrome). While somatic MLH1 promoter hypermethylation is generally accepted in the tumorigenesis of sporadic tumours, abnormal MLH1 promoter methylation in normal body cells is controversially discussed as a mechanism predisposing patients to HNPCC. In all 94 patients suspected of HNPCC-syndrome with a mean age of onset of 45.5 years, MLH1-deficiency in their tumours but no germline mutation, underwent methylation-specific PCR-screening for MLH1 promoter methylation. In peripheral blood cells of 12 patients an MLH1 promoter methylation, in seven informative cases allele-specific, was found. Normal colonic tissue, buccal mucosa, and tumour tissue available from three patients also presented abnormal methylation in the MLH1 promoter. The heredity of aberrant methylation is questionable. Pro: MLH1 promoter methylation was found in a patient and his mother giving evidence for a familial predisposition for an epimutation in MLH1. Contra: a de novo set-up of methylation in one patient, a mosaic or incomplete methylation pattern in six patients, and no evidence for inheritance of MLH1 promoter methylation in the remaining families. Our findings provide strong evidence that MLH1 promoter methylation in normal body cells mimics HNPCC and constitutes a pathogenic pre-lesion in MLH1. The identification of hypermethylation as an epigenetic defect has important implications for surveillance recommendations, as these patients should be treated like Lynch syndrome patients, whereas the heritability of methylation is still under investigation.     

Comparison between two widely used laboratory methods in BRAF V600 mutation detection in a large cohort of clinical samples of cutaneous melanoma metastases to the lymph nodes

Aims: The study compares detection rates of oncogenic BRAF mutations in a homogenous group of 236 FFPE cutaneous melanoma lymph node metastases, collected in one cancer center. BRAF mutational status was verified by two independent in-house PCR/Sanger sequencing tests, and the Cobas® 4800 BRAF V600 Mutation Test. Results: The best of two sequencing approaches returned results for 230/236 samples. In 140 (60.9%), the mutation in codon 600 of BRAF was found. 91.4% of all mutated cases (128 samples) represented p.V600E. Both Sanger-based tests gave reproducible results although they differed significantly in the percentage of amplifiable samples: 230/236 to 109/143. Cobas generated results in all 236 cases, mutations changing codon V600 were detected in 144 of them (61.0%), including 5 not amplifiable and 5 negative in the standard sequencing. However, 6 cases positive in sequencing turned out to be negative in Cobas. Both tests provided us with the same BRAF V600 mutational status in 219 out of 230 cases with valid results (95.2%). Conclusions: The total BRAF V600 mutation detection rate didn’t differ significantly between the two methodological approaches (60.9% vs. 61.0%). Sequencing was a reproducible method of V600 mutation detection and more powerful to detect mutations other than p.V600E, while Cobas test proved to be less susceptible to the poor DNA quality or investigator’s bias. The study underlined an important role of pathologists in quality assurance of molecular diagnostics.     

Negative reactions of BRAF mutation‐specific immunohistochemistry to non‐V600E mutations of BRAF

BRAF mutations are rare driver mutations in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), accounting for 1%–2% of the driver mutations, and the mutation spectrum has a wide range in contrast to other tumors. While V600E is a dominant mutation in melanoma, more than half of the mutations in NSCLCs are non‐V600E. However, treatment with dabrafenib plus trametinib targets the BRAF V600E mutation exclusively. Therefore, distinguishing between V600E and non‐V600E mutations is crucial for biomarker testing in NSCLC in order to determine treatment of choice. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the BRAF V600E mutation‐specific antibody is clinically used in melanoma patients, but little is known about its application in NSCLC, particularly with regard to the assay performance for non‐V600E mutations. In the present study, we examined 117 tumors with BRAF mutations, including 30 with non‐V600E mutations, using BRAF mutation‐specific IHC. None of the tumors with non‐V600E mutations, including two compound mutations, showed a positive reaction. Furthermore, all V600E mutations were positive except for one case with combined BRAF V600E and K601_W604 deletion. Our findings confirmed that the BRAF V600E mutation‐specific IHC is specific without any cross‐reactions to non‐V600E mutations, suggesting that this assay can be a useful screening tool in clinical practice.