Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen and anti-HCV antibodies improves the early detection of HCV infection

To evaluate whether a new enzyme immunoassay developed for the simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (Ag) and anti-HCV antibodies (anti-HCV Ab) (Monolisa HCV Ag/Ab ULTRA; Bio-Rad) could improve the early detection of HCV infection, we compared its sensitivity to that of anti-HCV, HCV core Ag, and HCV RNA assays. The populations studied included 12 blood donor samples positive for HCV RNA and HCV core Ag but negative for anti-HCV antibodies and 23 hemodialysis patients who developed anti-HCV Ab (seroconversion) during the follow-up. From these 23 individuals, 83 samples sequentially collected prior to seroconversion and 108 samples collected after seroconversion were tested. Six of 12 blood donations were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab assay. In the hemodialysis cohort, the 24 HCV RNA-negative samples were negative by the HCV Ag/Ab assay and 23 of the 59 HCV RNA-positive samples (39%) were positive. The HCV Ag/Ab assay detected HCV infection on average 21.6 days before the most sensitive antibody assay. The HCV Ag/Ab assay did not detect HCV infection as early as the HCV RNA assay (mean delay, 30.3 days) or HCV Ag assay (mean delays, 27.9, and 16.3 days by the HCV core Ag quantification assay and the HCV Ag blood screening assay, respectively). This new assay provides a notable improvement for the early detection of HCV infection during the so-called window period compared with anti-HCV Ab assays and could be a useful alternative to HCV RNA detection or HCV core Ag assays for diagnosis or blood screening when nucleic acid technologies or HCV core Ag detection are not implemented.     

Is Hepatitis C Virus Core Antigen an Adequate Marker for Community Screening?

A new hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (HCV Ag) assay was thought to have a good correlation with HCV RNA. The aim was to elucidate the usefulness of this HCV Ag assay in community screening. In a township where HCV is endemic, 405 residents aged 58 years or older responded to a follow-up community screening. All subjects were tested for anti-HCV (AxSYM, version 3.0; Abbott Diagnostics) and HCV Ag (Architect HCV Ag test; Abbott Diagnostics). For subjects with anti-HCV signal-to-cutoff ratios (S/CO) > 10 and/or HCV Ag > 3 fmol/liter, HCV RNA data (Taqman HCV RNA; Roche Diagnostics) were further checked. A total of 115 (28.4%) subjects had their serum HCV RNA levels measured, and 93 were HCV RNA positive. The other 290 subjects were supposed to be HCV RNA negative. HCV Ag was significantly correlated with HCV RNA according to the following equation: (log HCV RNA) = 2.08 + 1.03 (log HCV Ag) (R(2) = 0.94; P < 0.001). As determined using a combination of the values for anti-HCV (S/CO > 40) and HCV Ag (>3 fmol/liter) as a cutoff to predict viremia, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.8%, 100%, 99.3%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. In conclusion, for a community study, HCV Ag showed good correlation with HCV RNA. In addition, anti-HCV or HCV Ag can predict HCV viremia well, while a combination of anti-HCV (>40 S/CO) and HCV Ag (>3 fmol/liter) can provide the best result validity.     

Simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibodies in Saudi drug users using a novel assay

Drug users and particularly, injecting drug users, are at increased risk for infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV). The aims of the study were to simultaneously detect HCV core antigen and specific antibodies in sera from Saudi drug users using the new HCV combination assay and to compare this data with HCV core antigen, anti-HCV antibodies and HCV RNA data from the same patients. A total of 297 patients who are followed up or admitted to a drug rehabilitation hospital over a period of 3 years were included in this study. Samples were analyzed using the new HCV Ag/Ab combination assay (Meurex), HCV core Ag assay, HCV antibodies and with the HCV RNA assay. Out of the 297 samples from Saudi drug users, 111 samples (37.4%) have detectable HCV core Ag, 112 samples (37.7%) have detectable HCV antibodies, 118 have detectable HCV RNA, and 116 samples were positive by the HCV Ag/Ab combination assay (39.1%). Out of the 116 samples, HCV core Ag was detected in 110 samples (94.8%), HCV antibodies were detected in 111 (95.7%) samples and HCV RNA was detected in 114 samples (98.3%). In the control group (n = 305), only 2 (0.66%) blood donor were positive by HCV antibodies assay, HCV RNA assay as well as HCV Ag/Ab combination assay. The new HCV Ag/Ab combination assay may well improve the overall quality of diagnosis of HCV infection especially in high risk population such as drug users that necessitates rigorous testing.     

Prevalence of anti-HCV and HCV viremia in hemodialysis patients in Taiwan.

Hepatitis C viral infection in 125 hemodialysis patients from Taiwan was studied using a second-generation anti-HCV immunoassay (EIA II) (Abbott HCV 2.0 EIA) and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the HCV RNA in the serum. A total of 59 patients (47.2%) were positive by EIA II. In comparison, the conventional C100-3 anti-HCV assay was positive in 40 (32.0%). HCV RNA was found in 47 patients (37.6%). Patients with elevated serum transaminase level had a higher positive rate of anti-HCV and HCV RNA. The dialysis time was longer for those patients positive for anti-HCV than for those who were negative. A total of 57 of the 59 EIA II-positive cases had a history of blood transfusion. The HBsAg status did not influence the anti-HCV positivity. Among the 59 EIA II-positive patients, 66.1% were also positive for HCV RNA, and of the 47 HCV RNA-positive cases 83.0% were positive for EIA II. It is concluded that the high prevalence of specific HCV infection and HCV viremia was present in these patients. Prevention of cross-contamination during dialysis and blood screening before transfusion are important for the control of HCV infection in these patients.     

丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原检测用于献血者筛查价值的探讨

目的应用酶联免疫吸附技术筛查献血员中丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原（HCV—cAg）和抗体（HCV—Ab），了解丙型肝炎病毒核心抗原筛查献血员应用价值。方法对我站2004年8-12月间的3972份献血者血清标本进行抗-HCV初、复检和HCV—cAg ELISA检测，将ELISA法阳性的25份血清标本，再做RT-PCR检测证实。结果3972份血清标本检测中，有10份仅初检抗-HCV阳性样本，经HCVRNA检测阳性有l份，12份仅复检抗-HCV阳性样本，经HCVRNA检测阳性有1份，HCV—cAg检测阳性有3份，经HCVRNA检测阳性有2份。结论HCV—cAg ELISA检测技术的敏感性与HCVRNA技术类似，但成本明显降低，可与HCV抗体联合检测应用献血员筛查。     

Comparative evaluation of the total hepatitis C virus core antigen,branched-DNA,and amplicor monitor assays in determining viremia for patients with chronic hepatitis C during interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy

An assay prototype designed to detect and quantify total hepatitis C virus [HCV] core antigen (HCV core Ag) protein in serum and plasma in the presence or absence of anti-HCV antibodies has been recently developed by Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics. The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of the Total HCV core Ag assay in comparison with two quantitative assays for HCV RNA: Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA v2.0) or Versant HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA v3.0) assays and the Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor version 2.0 (HCM v2.0) test. We have studied samples of a well-characterized panel and samples from patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon alone or with ribavirin. We have also compared the kinetics of HCV core Ag and HCV RNA in the follow-up of treated patients. The HCV core Ag assay exhibited linear behavior across samples from different genotypes. The coefficients of variation for intra- and interassay performance were 5.11 and 9.95%, respectively. The specificity of the assay tested in blood donors was 99.5%. Samples from HCV-infected patients showed that the correlation between the HCV core Ag and the two HCV RNA quantitative assays (bDNA and HCM v2.0) was 0.8 and 0.7, respectively. This correlation was maintained across different genotypes of HCV (r(2) = 0.64 to 0.94). Baseline HCV core Ag values were significantly lower in sustained responders to interferon (IFN) than in other groups of patients (5.31 log(10) [10(4) pg/ml] versus 5.99 log(10) [10(4) pg/ml]; P < 0.001). In patients treated with IFN or combination therapy, we found an association between a decrease of more than 2 log IU/ml in viral load, undetectable HCV core Ag, and sustained response. Among sustained responders to IFN alone or combination therapy and among relapsers after IFN alone, 84 out of 101 (83.2%) had undetectable HCV core Ag, and 76 out of 96 (79.2%) had a viral load decrease of >/=2 log IU/ml, after 1 month of treatment. In conclusion, the Total HCV core Ag assay is a new useful test for the detection of HCV viremia and the monitoring of patients treated with IFN alone or in combination with ribavirin.     

Low prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection among dentists in Taiwan

To evaluate whether hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an occupational hazard in the dental environment, serum samples collected in 1990–1991 from 461 dentists were tested for the antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) with first- and second-generation HCV enzyme-linked immunoassays (EIAs). Five of the 363 (1.38%) serum samples were reactive by the first-generation (C100–3) HCV EIA. Of the same 363 samples and the other 98 samples, 3 (0.65%) were reactive by the second-generation EIA. Those samples positive by the first- and/or second-generation HCV EIA were analyzed further by cDNA/polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect the presence of HCV RNA. Only 1 of the 5 first-generation EIA reactive samples were PCR positive. These results are comparable to the anti-HCV prevalence of healthy blood donors (0.95% by C100–3 assay) and pregnant women (0.63% by recombinant immunoblot assay). We conclude that the prevalence of HCV infection among dentists in Taiwan is low, and there is no increased risk of HCV infection through the practice of dentistry, at least in our area. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Development of low cost peptide-based anti-hepatitis C virus screening and confirmatory assays: comparison with commercially available tests.

Screening and confirmatory low cost reagent tests have been developed for detection of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV). Assays are based on the use of specific synthetic peptides from several structural and non-structural viral proteins. The efficacy of the screening anti-HCV EIA-Spep assay was compared with both Abbott EIA 2.0 (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) and Ortho EIA 2.0 (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Raritan, NJ) anti-HCV detection kits and the confirmatory EIA-Cpep assay was compared with the Abbott Matrix anti-HCV confirmation test. In the EIA-Spep, a pool of 3 peptides was added to each well of a microtiter plate. In EIA-Cpep, each well was separately coated with 1 of 4 peptides and 1 recombinant protein. A total of 867 blood donor samples from Costa Rica tested simultaneously with the 3 screening assays yielded the same specificity and negative predictive values of > or =99.9% and 100%, respectively. A comparative study on voluntary blood donor samples from Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador using the 2 anti-HCV confirmatory assays revealed different patterns that are 46% positive, 24% indeterminate, and 30% negative with the EIA-Cpep assay vs. 31% positive, 48% indeterminate, and 21% negative with the Matrix assay. A study of 71 patient samples from Costa Rica showed a higher correlation between initially reactive samples when analyzed by the Abbott and Ortho kits, than when the assay results were compared between the Abbott and EIA-Spep kits; the latter detected 7 and 15 non-reactive samples, respectively. These results could reflect the use of a similar antigen source for the 2 commercial assays. The presence of HCV RNA in a group of 29 samples analyzed was related to the simultaneous reactivity in all 3 screening assays. None of the discordant samples had detectable levels of HCV RNA. Economic difficulties for health care services in the developing countries of Central America have prevented implementation of routine anti-HCV blood donor screening tests. This is likely to be the primary reason for uncontrolled dissemination of HCV, and the lack of identification of potential high risk groups. Alternative low cost reagents developed locally as described in this article could be a useful tool in the control of HCV spread throughout the developing world.     

Impact of screening donor blood for alanine aminotransferase and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen on the risk of hepatitis C virus transmission

The transfusion-related risk of transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) was evaluated in France for the periods before and after exclusion of donor blood units with the surrogate markers elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc). A total of 1,412 blood recipients undergoing surgery were followed up prospectively in the period from 1986 to 1989. The stored serum samples were tested for antibodies to HCV by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and the result in reactive sera confirmed by a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). The risk of HCV transmission was estimated by the maximum likelihood method for a subpopulation of 892 recipients divided into three groups. Of 55 (3.9 %) EIA positive patients, 56.4 % were found to be positive prior to transfusion. HCV seroconversion (positive RIBA) occurred in 22 patients (1.6 %). The risk of HCV transmission per 1,000 transfused blood units decreased significantly from 4.11 in Group 1 (receiving non-screened blood) to 3.43 in Group II (receiving ALT screened blood) and to 1.40 in Group III (receiving ALT and anti-HBc screened blood). These results demonstrate that screening of donors for surrogate markers had reduced the risk of HCV transmission before the introduction of a systematic anti-HCV screening policy in France in March 1990.     

Comparison of serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA and core antigen levels in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and HCV and treated with interferon plus ribavirin

Trak-C (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics) is an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based method capable of quantifying hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen (CA) in serum and could be an alternative to molecular detection and quantification of HCV RNA. We have evaluated the Trak-C assay in comparison with an HCV RNA quantitative assay (Versant HCV v3.0; Bayer Diagnostics) in the follow-up of 348 treated, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected patients included in the ANRS HC02 RIBAVIC trial. ANRS HC02 RIBAVIC is a therapeutic, multicenter, randomized protocol comparing the efficacy of alpha interferon 2b (IFN-alpha2b) (3 million units three times a week)-ribavirin (800 mg/day) to that of pegylated IFN-alpha2b (1.5 mug/kg of body weight/week)-ribavirin (800 mg/day) during 48 weeks of treatment of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients na?ve to HCV treatment. Patients were assessed for virological analysis at day 0 and weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72. Correlation of HCV RNA and HCV CA at the initiation of treatment was excellent (r = 0.92). HCV RNA and CA kinetics were similar during follow-up of HCV treatment from day 0 to week 72 whatever the group of response and genotype. The positive and negative predictive values of response to the treatment at week 4 were 59 and 94%, respectively, for HCV RNA load reduction of >2 log and 54 and 94%, respectively, for HCV CA below the threshold value (4.18 log(10) pg/ml . 10(4)). Trak-C, a new assay able to quantify CA in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, correlates well with quantitative HCV RNA assays and is cheaper and easier to perform than molecular technology. HCV CA could be a valuable alternative test for therapeutic follow-up of coinfected patients treated with IFN plus ribavirin in developing countries.     

Strategies for reliable diagnosis of hepatitis C infection: the need for a serological confirmatory assay.

The aim of the study was to examine whether the diagnosis of Hepatitis C (HCV) infection can be obtained reliably without using an immunoblot-based confirmation assay. 1,708 EIA-reactive serum samples were examined retrospectively for (i) optical density value in the screening assay, (ii) reactivity in an immunoblot assay, and (iii) result by RT PCR. In 1,394 (81.0%) samples positive results were obtained by both the HCV EIA and the confirmation assay. OD-values > or = 2.2 were observed in 1026 of these samples, but covered the range from 0.4 to 2.1 in the other 368 samples. The combination of HCV EIA reactivity and indeterminate immunoblot assay was observed in 134 (7.8%) serum samples. HCV RNA was detected in 58 cases by PCR. The OD-values of these 58 samples ranged from 0.4 to >2.2. Especially reactivity against the core recombinant protein was indicative of PCR positivity. The reactivity by the HCV EIA could not be confirmed by immunoblot assay or PCR in 180 (10.5%) sera. These false reactive sera showed OD values by EIA from 0.3 to 2.1. It is concluded that no threshold values can be defined which would allow differentiation between positive, indeterminate, and false reactive result by HCV EIA without producing an unacceptably high number of false negative diagnoses. Not using immunoblot-based confirmation would result in many additional PCR examinations. Therefore, confirmation of reactive HCV EIA results by a serological confirmatory assay must remain an essential part of the diagnostic procedure.     

Evolving strategy for HCV testing in an Italian tertiary care hospital

BackgroundDiagnostic tests for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection should be adapted according to the clinical status of the patient.ObjectivesWe exploited the application of different HCV diagnostic algorithms in a tertiary care hospital practice.Study designThe laboratory clinical reports to the medical orders for HCV testing during three years were clustered by different combinations of assays for anti-HCV antibodies (HCV Ab) (screening and confirmatory), HCV nucleic acid (HCV-RNA), HCV core antigen (HCV Ag). The latter was the first-line assay in acute HCV infections requiring a rapid assessment of the infectious state.ResultsThe majority (91.9%) of the 2726 subjects whose samples were analyzed were inpatients. Most of the patients/subjects were tested for clinical suspicion of viral hepatitis (49.2%), or occupational accident to health care professionals (20.0%). On 66% of samples HCV Ag test alone was performed and resulted positive in 116 cases (6%), while it was detected in 50.3% of anti-HCV positive samples. The agreement between HCV Ag and HCV-RNA was very high (k = 0.97); HCV Ag positivity rates increased according to the signal of the HCV Ab screening test.ConclusionsThe use of different testing strategies according to the patients’ history and clinical status allowed a significant reduction of the number of tests performed and the time needed to provide a diagnostic response useful for patients’ management without compromising the overall diagnostic accuracy for HCV infection.     

Comparison of HCV core antigen and anti-HCV with HCV RNA results

Background

The measurement of anti-HCV antibodies using immunological methods and the confirmation of viral nuclear acid based on molecular methods is important in diagnosis and follow-up of the HCV infection.

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to analyse HCV core Antigen positivity among anti-HCV antibody positive sera to determine the significance of testing of HCV core Ag for the laboratory diagnosis of HCV infection, by considering the correlation between serum HCV core Ag and HCV RNA levels.

Methods

115 patients suspected of having hepatitis C and who were positive for anti-HCV antibody were investigated using chemiluminescent and molecular methods. Anti-HCV antibody, HCV core Ag and HCV RNA levels were detected by the Vitros ECiQ immunodiagnostic system, Architect i2000 system and RT-PCR, respectively.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and accuracy rate of HCV core Antigen assay were detected as 86.5%(83/96), 100%(19/19), 100%(83/83), 59.4%(19/32), 88.7%(102/115) respectively.

Conclusion

HCV core Ag assay could be used for diagnosis of HCV infection as it is easy to perform, cost-effective, has high specificity and positive predictive value. However, it should be kept in mind that it may have lack of sensitivity and negative predictive value.