A Retrospective Comparison of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy with Burch Colposuspension versus Sacrospinous Fixation with Transvaginal Needle Suspension for the Management of Vaginal Vault Prolapse and Coexisting Stress Incontinence

The objective of this study was to compare the surgical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy and Burch colposuspension with sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal needle suspension in the management of vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence. One hundred and seventeen women with vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence were surgically managed over a 7-year period. The first 61 consecutive women who underwent sacrospinous fixation and transvaginal needle suspension comprised the vaginal group, and the following 56 consecutive women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy and Burch colposuspension comprised the abdominal group. Office records were reviewed to assess the presence of recurrent prolapse and urinary incontinence during postoperative follow-up. Objective follow-up was available for 101 women. Mean duration of follow-up was 24.0 ± 15 months for the vaginal group, and 23.1 ± 12.6 months for the abdominal group. The incidence of recurrent prolapse to or beyond the hymen (33% vs. 19%, P = 0.0505) and lower urinary tract symptoms (26% vs. 13%, P = 0.0506) were significantly higher in the vaginal group than in the abdominal group. Our data suggest that the combined abdominal approach has a lower incidence of recurrent prolapse and lower urinary tract symptoms than the combined vaginal approach in managing vaginal vault prolapse and coexisting stress incontinence.     

Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse with abdominal sacral colpopexy using prolene mesh

BACKGROUND: We report our experience of abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) with a prolene mesh in women with total vaginal vault prolapse. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1994 to 1997, 15 patients (average age 57 years), underwent ASC. All the patients suffered from a serious vaginal vault prolapse. Eight of them also had a uterine prolapse. Seven patients had already been operated on for hysterectomy (5 vaginal, 2 abdominal), and 4 of them had already undergone an operation for urinary incontinence (3 Raz, 1 Burch). In 6 cases ASC was associated with a colposuspension in accordance with Burch. Average follow-up was 20 months. RESULTS: All the patients carried a bladder catheter for 4 to 12 days (mean 5). The 11 patients who were sexually active began having normal sexual intercourse again. Neither relapses of the treated prolapses nor infection or rejections of the prostheses occurred. In 1 patient frequent micturition unresponsive to anticholinergics persisted. Four patients presented with hypogastric "sense of heaviness," with no clinical evidence of any pathology. CONCLUSION: ASC with a prolene net is confirmed as the most valid technique, with no complications, in the treatment of total vaginal vault prolapse, above all when there is also the need for other operations via the abdomen at the same time (colposuspension, culdoplasty, and so forth), or when the vagina is too short to fix the sacrospinal ligament transvaginally.     

Longterm followup of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse abdominal repair: a report of 85 cases

BACKGROUND: There are many surgical procedures to treat posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. Abdominal sacral colpopexy is one of these procedures. The aim of this study was to review the cases of 85 consecutive patients treated by this technique since 1978 by the same surgical team using the same procedure. Our surgical procedure will be explained. STUDY DESIGN: Eighty-five patients were treated in our department between 1978 and 1998 for posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse. The mean age was 55.42 years. The mean weight was 63.37 kg. Their parity ranged from 0 to 5 (mean, 2.54). The interval of time between hysterectomy and vaginal vault prolapse repair ranged from 1 to 37 years (mean, 17.92 years). The main indication for hysterectomy was uterine leiomyomas. Of these patients, 67.05% had stress urinary incontinence, and mean urethral closure pressure was 48.7 cm H2O. All patients had abdominal sacral colpopexy associated with a Burch procedure and a posterior perineal repair. RESULTS: Seventeen patients had postoperative fever. Twenty-two had urinary tract infections. Two patients had to undergo blood transfusion. Three patients had postoperative urinary retention. The median longterm followup was 10.5 years; 27.05% of patients had relapsing stress urinary incontinence. Two patients had a relapse of the vaginal vault prolapse. CONCLUSIONS: The abdominal sacral colpopexy is a safe operation with low morbidity and long-standing good results. It can be recommended for sexually active women. Nevertheless, the Burch procedure performed with this operation failed to prevent recurrence of urinary incontinence.     

Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: a short version Cochrane review

BACKGROUND: Pelvic organ prolapse may occur in up to 50% of parous women. A variety of urinary, bowel and sexual symptoms may be associated with prolapse. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of the many different surgeries in the management of pelvic organ prolapse. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Incontinence Group Specialised Trials Register (searched 3 May 2006) and reference lists of relevant articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials that included surgical operations for pelvic organ prolapse. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trials were assessed and data extracted independently by two reviewers. Six investigators were contacted for additional information with five responding. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty two randomised controlled trials were identified evaluating 2368 women.Abdominal sacral colpopexy was better than vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy in terms of a lower rate of recurrent vault prolapse (RR 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.77) and less dyspareunia (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86), but the trend towards a lower re-operation rate for prolapse following abdominal sacrocolpopexy was not statistically significant (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.11). However, the vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy was quicker and cheaper to perform and women had an earlier return to activities of daily living. The data were too few to evaluate other clinical outcomes and adverse events. The three trials contributing to this comparison were clinically heterogeneous. For the anterior vaginal wall prolapse, standard anterior repair was associated with more recurrent cystoceles than when supplemented by polyglactin mesh inlay (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.90) or porcine dermis mesh inlay (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.20 to 6.14), but data on morbidity, other clinical outcomes and for other mesh or graft materials were too few for reliable comparisons. For posterior vaginal wall prolapse, the vaginal approach was associated with a lower rate of recurrent rectocele and/or enterocele than the transanal approach (RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.64), although there was a higher blood loss and postoperative narcotic use. However, data on the effect of surgery on bowel symptoms and the use of polyglactin mesh inlay or porcine small intestine graft inlay on the risk of recurrent rectocele were insufficient for meta-analysis.Meta-analysis on the impact of pelvic organ prolapse surgery on continence issues was limited and inconclusive, although about 10% of women developed new urinary symptoms after surgery. Although the addition of tension-free vaginal tape to endopelvic fascia plication (RR 5.5, 95% CI 1.36 to 22.32) and Burch colposuspension to abdominal sacrocolpopexy (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.24) were followed by a lower risk of women developing new postoperative stress incontinence, but other outcomes, particularly economic, remain to be evaluated. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is associated with a lower rate of recurrent vault prolapse and dyspareunia than the vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy. These benefits must be balanced against a longer operating time, longer time to return to activities of daily living and increased cost of the abdominal approach. The use of mesh or graft inlays at the time of anterior vaginal wall repair may reduce the risk of recurrent cystocele. Posterior vaginal wall repair may be better than transanal repair in the management of rectoceles in terms of recurrence of prolapse. The addition of a continence procedure to a prolapse repair operation may reduce the incidence of postoperative urinary incontinence but this benefit needs to be balanced against possible differences in costs and adverse effects. Adequately powered randomised controlled clinical trials are urgently needed.     

Abdominal Sacral Colpopexy with Prolene Mesh

The objective was to evaluate abdominal colposacropexy using Prolene mesh to correct total vaginal vault prolapse or total procidentia. Between 1994 and 1997 we performed colposacropexy on 15 patients for simple vaginal vault prolapse (in 7 cases after hysterectomy) and for total uterine prolapse in 8 cases. In these cases a simple abdominal hysterectomy was performed. We simultaneously performed colposacropexy with colposuspension according to the Burch technique for urinary stress incontinence in 6 cases. The colposacropexy technique consisted of isolating the vaginal apex and creating a retroperitoneal tunnel from the vagina to the sacral promontory. Between the vaginal cul de sac and the sacrum, a mesh of Prolene is inserted and fixed with non-absorbable sutures. The Foley catheter was removed after 4–12 days (average 5). Average follow-up was 15 months. No intraoperative complications occurred, and all patients who were sexually active have resumed normal sexual activity; no infections or rejections of the prostheses have been verified. We believe that it is very important to restore the normal anatomic support of the vaginal vault after prolapse. This strong support is assured by fixing the vaginal apex to the periosteum of the sacrum using Prolene mesh. Colposacropexy with Prolene mesh is a safe and effective technique for the surgical therapy of vaginal vault prolapse.     

Apical prolapse

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim was to review the safety and efficacy of pelvic organ prolapse surgery for vaginal apical prolapse.

Methods

Every 4 years and as part of the Fifth International Collaboration on Incontinence we reviewed the English-language scientific literature after searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, published up to January 2012. Publications were classified as level 1 evidence (randomised controlled trials (RCT) or systematic reviews), level 2 (poor quality RCT, prospective cohort studies), level 3 (case series or retrospective studies) and level 4 case reports. The highest level of evidence was utilised by the committee to make evidence-based recommendations based upon the Oxford grading system. Grade A recommendation usually depends on consistent level 1 evidence. Grade B recommendation usually depends on consistent level 2 and or 3 studies, or “majority evidence” from RCTs. Grade C recommendation usually depends on level 4 studies or “majority evidence? from level 2/3 studies or Delphi processed expert opinion. Grade D “no recommendation possible” would be used where the evidence is inadequate or conflicting and when expert opinion is delivered without a formal analytical process, such as by Delphi.

Results

Abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) has a higher success rate than sacrospinous colpopexy with less SUI and postoperative dyspareunia for vault prolapse. ASC had greater morbidity including operating time, inpatient stay, slower return to activities of daily living and higher cost (grade A). ASC has the lowest inpatient costs compared with laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) and robotic sacral colpopexy (RSC). LSC has lower inpatient costs than RSC (grade B).In single RCTs the RSC had longer operating time than both ASC and LSC (grade B). In small trials objective outcomes appear similar although postoperative pain was greater in RSC. LSC is as effective as ASC with reduced blood loss and admission time (grade C). The data relating to operating time are conflicting. ASC performed with polypropylene mesh has superior outcomes to fascia lata (level I), porcine dermis and small intestine submucosa (level 3; grade B). In a single RCT, LSC had a superior objective and subjective success rate and lower reoperation rate compared with polypropylene transvaginal mesh for vault prolapse (grade B).Level 3 evidence suggests that vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension, McCall culdoplasty, iliococcygeus fixation and colpocleisis are relatively safe and effective interventions (grade C).

Conclusion

Sacral colpopexy is an effective procedure for vault prolapse and further data are required on the route of performance and efficacy of this surgery for uterine prolapse. Polypropylene mesh is the preferred graft at ASC. Vaginal procedures for vault prolapse are well described and are suitable alternatives for those not suitable for sacral colpopexy.     

Sacral colpopexy using mersilene mesh in the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse

We report the efficacy and safety of abdominal sacral colpopexy using Mersilene mesh to treat vaginal vault prolapse. A total of 61 patients underwent sacral colpopexy to treat vaginal vault prolapse of whom 58 were available for evaluation. The procedure utilizes an abdominal approach to expose the vaginal vault and the anterior surface of the first and second sacral vertebrae. A Mersilene mesh is fastened to the anterior and posterior vaginal walls then anchored to the sacrum without tension. Hysterectomy and posterior colporrhaphy were performed as indicated. Concomitant anti-incontinence surgery was performed in 52 patients: 41 underwent Burch colposuspension, and 11 had pubovaginal sling placement. To assess long-term subjective and clinical efficacy, patients completed a questionnaire and underwent pelvic examination at least 1 year following surgery. The resolution of symptoms, objective restoration of normal pelvic support, and urinary continence defined surgical success. Median patient age at operation was 62 years. Previous operations included 29 hysterectomy procedures, five failed sacrospinous fixation, and 12 failed anti-incontinence procedures. The total complication rate was 15%. With a median follow-up of 26 months, complete correction of vaginal prolapse was found in 91% of patients. Vaginal symptoms were relieved in 90% of patients and 88% of patients had resolution of their urinary incontinence. Ninety percent of patients were satisfied with the surgery and would recommend it to others. Sacral colpopexy using Mersilene mesh relieves vaginal vault symptoms, restores vaginal function, and provides durable pelvic support.     

Vaginal vault prolapse: Evaluation and repair

The prevalence of pelvic prolapse should continue to increase as our population ages. With the increased prevalence will come a greater need to evaluate and treat women with symptomatic prolapse. This review focuses on prolapse of the vaginal vault and discusses the evaluation and surgical therapies including vaginal, abdominal, and laparoscopic approaches.     

Abdominal sacral colpopexy with Mersilene mesh.

INTRODUCTION: This study focussed on abdominal sacral colpopexy with Mersilene mesh to correct total vaginal vault prolapse. Our aim was to describe and explain our operative modifications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1992 and 1999, we performed sacrocolpopexy on 25 patients for vaginal vault prolapse. We proposed a change by interposing a mesh between the vaginal vault and the sacral promontory shaped as an inverted 'V'. RESULTS: No intraoperative or postoperative complications were encountered; to date the outcome of all patients was satisfactory. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of the follow-up, this new surgical approach of abdominal sacral colpopexy can be considered as effective surgery for vaginal vault prolapse.     

Transvaginal strangulated small intestinal hernia after abdominal sacrocolpopexy: case report and literature review

Purpose

To report a case of transvaginal small intestinal hernia following abdominal sacrocolpopexy and review this clinical presentation in the current literature.

Methods

A review of our case and a literature review of vaginal evisceration were carried out.

Results

The patient underwent sacrocolpopexy and a Burch procedure. Six months later, a recurrent enterocele through a 1 cm defect in the vaginal vault was diagnosed. Several weeks later she presented with an incarcerated and strangulated loop of small intestine extending beyond the introitus. This required an urgent exploratory laparotomy, ileocecal resection, and vaginal vault closure. Postoperatively, she experienced gradual prolapse recurrence and is currently successfully managed with a pessary. Risk factors that include vaginal atrophy, chronic constipation, and previous pelvic surgery may have contributed to the evisceration, mesh erosion, and may have caused the breakdown in the vaginal vault mucosa ultimately responsible for the evisceration. In addition, placement of the sacrocolpopexy mesh without tension, and utilization of an interposition graft to reinforce the weakened vaginal vault tissue, are aspects of the surgical procedure that may influence outcomes. At the time of evisceration repair, the best approach to resuspend the vaginal vault, and prevent recurrent prolapse or evisceration, is currently unknown.

Conclusion

Vaginal evisceration is a potential complication of abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Early recognition and treatment of this complication is critical, and prolapse recurrence may occur even after surgical repair.     

Posthysterectomy Vault Prolapse

The incidence of vault prolapse is uncertain but appears to be increased five fold after vaginal hysterectomy. A precise scoring system has now been devised to overcome the diagnosis and classification of this condition. Conservative measures may be used to treat this condition in women unfit for surgery or those who require symptomatic relief while awaiting surgery. The surgical options lie between a vaginal sacrospinous fixation, or abdominal procedures such as sacrocolpopexy or vault suspension operations. The success rate for these operations is over 90%. Pre-operative urodynamic evaluation is mandatory since these patients frequently have concomitant stress urinary incontinence which may require correction at the same time. The choice of operation will undoubtedly depend upon the experience of the surgeon but greater awareness and alteration of technique at the time of the original hysterectomy may be the better solution to reducing the incidence of vault prolapse.     

Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: current status and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to highlight the latest developments and future perspectives of the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. RECENT FINDINGS: The review of the relevant literature was performed through a complex search strategy including both free text and medical subject heading (MeSH) protocols. The search was limited to records written in English, concerning humans, and published in 2004. In addition, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was browsed for records regarding surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The selected papers were ranked according to the grade of evidence provided. Eight hundred and fifteen records were selected from a Medline search. We reviewed the abstracts of the records and selected 61 papers concerning the topic of the review. There was only one meta-analysis and four randomized clinical trials. All the other chosen studies were retrospective. The quality of the evidence found was poor. The evidence supported the use of mesh in anterior vaginal wall prolapse surgery and the indications both for abdominal sacrocolpopexy in case of vaginal vault prolapse and posterior colporrhaphy in case of rectocele. However, the data regarding lower urinary tract, bowel, sexual functions, generic quality of life issues, and long-term outcome were insufficient. SUMMARY: Well designed, adequately powered, multicenter prospective randomized studies should be planned, including appropriate standardizations of methodology of pelvic organ prolapse staging (such as POP-Q system) and indications for treatment. Moreover, validated questionnaires should be used to assess the impact of surgery on functional and quality of life issues at adequate follow-up.     

Long-term follow-up after vaginal sacrospinous fixation: patient satisfaction,anatomical results and quality of life

The objective of this study is to evaluate long-term anatomical results, symptoms of descent, and quality of life after vaginal sacrospinous fixation (SSF) through postoperative follow up study from one institution. Ninety nine women (mean 66 years) underwent vaginal SSF for vault prolapse at our institution. We contacted all patients 2-15 years after surgery for examination (POP-Q, survey). Sixteen out of 55 (29%) patients, who completed follow-up, presented with cystocele, three patients with rectocele, and four patients had a recurrent vault prolapse. As for quality of life, 42/55 (76%) patients reported lower urinary tract symptoms, but only 9/55 (16%) felt a sensation of prolapse. Ten out of 24 patients, who were still sexually active, reported symptoms of sexual dysfunction. There was no correlation between length of follow-up and anatomical or functional results. Vaginal sacrospinous fixation resulted in excellent vault suspension but 29% of the patients developed cystocele formation. Only 16% of patients reported symptoms of descent.     

Anatomical correction of vaginal vault prolapse by uterosacral ligament fixation in women who also require a pubovaginal sling

PURPOSE: We describe the anatomical and functional outcome in patients who underwent vaginal vault fixation to the proximal uterosacral ligaments for the treatment of vault prolapse and who also required a concomitant pubovaginal sling for associated stress urinary incontinence as well as the repair of other sector defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 33 patients who underwent such repairs between November 1998 and December 2001. Endopelvic fascial defects were described using the pelvic organ prolapse quantitative system (POPQ). Outcome measures included anatomical and functional assessment of pelvic floor defects and urinary incontinence. RESULTS: Preoperatively all patients complained of a vaginal bulge and stress urinary incontinence, while 17 of the 33 had urge incontinence, and 24 and 9 had POPQ stage III or IV and stage II prolapse, respectively. Mean followup was 28 months (range 6 to 43). There was significant improvement in all POPQ measurements (p <0.05). Most notably vaginal cuff support improved by a mean of 7 cm. Stages IIAp (rectocele) and IIC (cuff) prolapse developed in 4 and 2 failed cases, respectively. Stress urinary incontinence was cured in all 33 patients and urge incontinence was cured in 14 of 17, while in 27 vaginal prolapse symptoms resolved and most had improved defecation dysfunction. No patients had urinary obstructive symptoms. There were no ureteral, bladder or rectal complications but 1 patient required blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Suspension of the vaginal cuff to the proximal uterosacral ligaments with site specific repair of other associated endopelvic fascial defects provides excellent anatomical and functional correction of vault prolapse. Furthermore, a concomitant pubovaginal sling is a compatible repair for associated stress urinary incontinence. It did not compromise vaginal repair and prolapse repair did not jeopardize the outcome of the sling.     

Transvaginal sacrospinal colposcopy in treatment of uterovaginal and vaginal wall prolapse

Investigation has been performed upon 29 patients of average age of 62.7 years who have undergone sacrospinous colpopexy because of different degree of uterovaginal prolapse (26 patients) and vaginal vault prolapse (3 patients) after having abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. In patients with uterovaginal prolapse, 23 of them have vaginal hysterectomy with high ligation of the enterocele sac, anterior et posterior vaginal repair and sacrospinous colpopexy, while 3 patients had conservation of uterus following previous reparation of vaginal walls and cervicosacrocolpopexy. Only in one patient we had intraoperative lession of the bladder with no other intraoperative complications so far. Aveage time duration of the operation was 112 minutes. All patients were scheduled to be seen at 4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months after operation and then yearly therafter. The mean follow-up period was 16.8 months (6-27). We have achieved satisfactory results in 25 patients while 4 patients have bladder instability, 3 patients suffered from urinary infection, 2 have febrile morbidity and 2 bottock pain. Sacrospinous colpopexy can be performed together with vaginal hysterectomy and anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair in patients with marked uterovaginal prolapse because of its high success in avoiding possible vault prolapse and low intra and post-operative complication rates.     

Will hysterectomy at the time of sacrocolpopexy increase the rate of polypropylene mesh erosion?

Will total abdominal hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy lead to polypropylene (Prolene, Ethicon, Somerset, NJ) mesh erosions? Sixty-seven patients demonstrating a stage 2 or more International Continence Society cystocele, rectocele, and uterine prolapse underwent combined sacrocolpopexy and polypropylene mesh fixation and total abdominal hysterectomy. Surgical failure was noted as prolapse of any of the three pelvic compartments with a stage 2 or more recurrence. Sixty-four patients were available for examination, and none demonstrated mesh erosion or recurrent vault prolapse with a median follow-up of 27 months. Four patients experienced a recurrent stage 2 rectocele without any cystoceles or vault prolapse. Performing abdominal hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy with polypropylene extensions does not increase the occurrence of synthetic material erosions in the vaginal vault or the anterior or posterior vaginal walls.     

Laparoscopic techniques for the repair of vaginal vault prolapse: Determining if less is more

Repair of vaginal vault prolapse remains a surgical challenge. Abdominal, vaginal, and combined procedures have been described. The ideal operation remains elusive with regard to outcomes, morbidity, and economics. As an extension of the abdominal approach, laparoscopy continues to gain favor as an access method and as a surgical advancement. Recent studies highlight a number of laparoscopic techniques for restoration of apical support that demonstrate feasibility and encouraging results. Further study is necessary to determine if the minimally invasive nature of laparoscopy can duplicate or surpass standard abdominal and vaginal approaches to the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.     

The Current Status of Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Review

Context

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common problem in women that causes morbidity and a decreased quality of life. Sacrocolpopexy can treat women with vaginal vault prolapse (VVP), multicompartmental POP, and/or a history of failed prolapse procedures. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) is the gold standard for VVP and is superior to vaginal sacrocolpopexy, with fewer recurrent prolapses and less dyspareunia. Vaginal prolapse repairs, however, are often faster and offer patients a shorter recovery time. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) aims to bridge this gap and to provide the outcomes of ASC with decreased morbidity.

Objective

This review evaluates the recent literature on LSC as a therapy for POP.

Evidence acquisition

A PubMed search of the available English literature on LSC was performed. The reference lists of selected articles were reviewed, and additional on-topic articles were included. Some 50 articles were screened, 22 articles were selected, and the reported outcomes from 11 series are presented in this review.

Evidence synthesis

Laparoscopic experience with POP has advanced tremendously, and LSC results from >1000 patients in 11 series support this. Conversion rates and operative times have decreased with increased experience. Mean operative time was 158 min (range: 96–286 min) with a 2.7% conversion rate (range: 0–11%) and a 1.6% early reoperation rate (range: 0–3.9%). With a mean follow-up of 24.6 mo (range: 11.4–66 mo), there was, on average, a 94.4% satisfaction rate, a 6.2% prolapse reoperation rate, and a 2.7% mesh erosion rate. Several centers have demonstrated that excellent outcomes with LSC are reproducible in terms of operative parameters, durable results, minimal complications, and high levels of patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

LSC upholds the outcomes of the gold standard ASC with minimal morbidity. Longer prospective and randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.     

Vaginalprolaps und Defäkationsobstruktion

Background

Stool outlet obstruction with incomplete or complete rectal prolapse combined with vaginal vault prolapse is a severe form of pelvic floor insufficiency. Combining laparoscopic resection rectopexy with a vaginal vault mesh colpo suspension is a possible way of correcting this defect.

Method

The safety of the combination was evaluated in 18 patients.

Results

The procedure was performed successfully with no complications in 16 of the 18 patients. One patient suffered intraoperative rectal injury and therefore received no polypropylene mesh, and one showed intraoperative bleeding requiring transfusion. No secondary surgery was required. Hospital stay lasted an average of 11.4 days (range 8–20) and the urinary catheters could be removed after an average of 4.3 days (range 2–10). No urinary disturbances were noted at the time of hospital release. Short-term mild fever appeared in 28% of cases (5/18). There were two urinary tract infections. No disturbance in healing and no anastomotic insufficiency were observed. The duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy averaged 3 days (range 0–8).

Conclusion

The combination of laparoscopic resection rectopexy with a vaginal vault mesh colpo suspension might be safe. The close contact between the mesh and anastomosis might induce no increase in insufficiency. Long-term outcome must still be evaluated.     

Economics of pelvic organ prolapse surgery

Introduction and hypothesis

The aim was to review the economic costs associated with pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Methods

Every 4 years and as part of the Fifth International Collaboration on Incontinence we reviewed the English-language scientific literature after searching PubMed, Medline, Cochrane library and Cochrane database of systematic reviews, published up to January 2012. Publications were classified as level 1 evidence (randomised controlled trials [RCT] or systematic reviews), level 2 (poor quality RCT, prospective cohort studies), level 3 (case series or retrospective studies) and level 4 (case reports). The highest level of evidence was utilised by the committee to make evidence based recommendations based upon the Oxford grading system. Grade A recommendation usually depends on consistent level 1 evidence. Grade B recommendation usually depends on consistent level 2 and/or 3 studies, or “majority evidence” from RCTs. Grade C recommendation usually depends on level 4 studies or “majority evidence” from level 2/3 studies or Delphi processed expert opinion. Grade D “no recommendation possible” would be used where the evidence is inadequate or conflicting and when expert opinion is delivered without a formal analytical process, such as by Delphi.

Results

The annual economic costs of pelvic organ prolapse surgeries are significant and over the next decades will grow at twice the rate of population growth because of our aging population. In a single institution study vaginal reconstructive surgery and pessary use were more cost-effective than expectant management, traditional abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC) or robot-assisted sacral colpopexy (RSC; grade C). Two studies have demonstrated that ASC incurs lower inpatient costs than LSC or RSC (grade C). Data from a single RCT demonstrated the LSC to incur lower inpatient costs than RSC specifically relating to shorter operating times in the LSC group (grade B). Data from a single RCT demonstrated LSC to be a more effective cost-minimising surgery than total vaginal mesh for vaginal vault prolapse (grade B). Data from a meta-analysis of anterior vaginal compartment prolapse operations demonstrated that commercial mesh kits for anterior repair are less cost-effective than non-kit mesh and anterior colporrhaphy (grade B).

Conclusions

There is a paucity of good economic data relating to pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Transvaginal mesh surgeries have not been proven to be cost-effective. It is recommended that all randomised controlled trials relating to prolapse surgery include a formal cost analysis.