Preoperative versus postoperative Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in gastric cancer patients: a randomized trial

OBJECTIVES: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is strongly recommended for gastric cancer patients who undergo subtotal gastrectomy. The efficacy of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication has not been adequately assessed in the gastric remnant. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of postoperative versus preoperative H. pylori eradication therapy. METHODS: A total of 138 distal gastric cancer patients with H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either preoperative (preop, N = 68) or postoperative (postop, N = 70) proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. The regimen consisted of rabeprazole 10 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and amoxicillin 1,000 mg, all twice daily for 7 days. Eradication was assessed by rapid urease test and histology 12 wk after surgery. RESULTS: By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, H. pylori eradication rates were 84.6% (95% CI 73.5-92.4) in the preop group and 83.1% (95% CI 71.7-91.2) in the postop group (P= 0.99). By per protocol (PP) analysis, the rates were 87.3% (95% CI 76.5-94.4) in the preop group and 86.9% (95% CI 75.8-94.2) in the postop group (P= 0.99). In the postop group, eradication rates did not differ with reconstruction method (Billroth I vs II, 80.4%[95% CI 66.1-90.6]vs 89.5%[95% CI 66.9-98.7] by ITT analysis (P= 0.49), and 85.7%[95% CI 71.5-94.6]vs 89.5% (95% CI 66.9-98.7) by PP analysis, P= 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In distal gastric cancer patients, the effect of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication was not different whether given postoperatively or preoperatively.     

Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the HYPER Study

BACKGROUND: Triple therapy is recommended for Helicobacter pylori eradication, yet consensus on the duration of treatment is lacking. AIM: To compare the efficacy and safety of 1- and 2-week regimens of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin in a large, multicentre, double-blind and randomised study. METHODS: A total of 909 H pylori-positive patients with duodenal ulcer, enrolled in 81 endoscopy units in Italy, were randomised to receive omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for either 1 week (OAC1W) or 2 weeks (OAC2W) or omeprazole and amoxicillin for 2 weeks. H pylori eradication was assessed by histological examination and carbon-13 urea breath test 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Both the intention-to-treat (ITT; n = 907) and per protocol (PP; n = 661) analyses showed no significant differences between the eradication rates of OAC1W (ITT 79.7%; PP 83.6%) and OAC2W (ITT 81.7%; PP 84.9%; ITT p = 0.53; PP p = 0.71). Both triple omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin regimens gave significantly higher eradication rates compared with omeprazole and amoxicillin treatment (ITT 44.6%; PP 42.8%; p<0.001). Poor compliance was reported in 18.6%, 17.3% and 15.1% (p = 0.51) of patients for OAC2W, OAC1W and omeprazole and amoxicillin, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 9.9% and 9.6% (p = 0.88) of patients for OAC2W and OAC1W, respectively, and in 5.9% for omeprazole and amoxicillin (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: 1-week and 2-week triple treatments for H pylori eradication are similar in terms of efficacy, safety and patient compliance.     

A randomized trial comparing seven-day ranitidine bismuth citrate and clarithromycin dual therapy to seven-day omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVE: To assess Helicobacter pylori eradication after one week dual ranitidine bismuth citrate-clarithromycin (RBC-C) or triple omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin (OCA) therapy. METHODS: In this multicentre Canadian trial, H pylori-positive patients with functional dyspepsia or inactive peptic ulcer disease were randomized to open-label treatment with RBC-C (ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg plus clarithromycin 500 mg) or OCA (omezaprole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1000 mg), given twice a day for seven days. Treatment allocation was randomly assigned. H pylori infection was confirmed by positive 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT). H pylori status was reassessed by UBT at least four and 12 weeks after treatment (negative: d13CO2 below 3.5 per mil). Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates were determined for all patients with confirmed H pylori infection. Per protocol (PP) rate was determined for all patients treated with at least two evaluable follow-up visits. RESULTS: Three hundred five patients were included in the ITT and 222 in the PP analysis. The ITT eradication rates were 66% for RBC-C and 78% for OCA. The PP success rates were 84% for RBC-C and 96% for OCA. The difference for both ITT 12% (95% CI 2 to 22) and PP 12% (95% CI 4 to 19) were statistically significant, P=0.030 and P=0.007, respectively. Treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The eradication rate for the seven-day dual RBC-C regimen was lower than that for OCA.     

Efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential and hybrid therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of moxifloxacin-based sequential therapy(MBST) versus hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From August 2014 to January 2015, 284 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized to receive a 14-d course of MBST(MBST group, n = 140) or hybrid(Hybrid group, n = 144) therapy. The MBST group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 7 d, followed by 20 mg rabeprazole and 500 mg metronidazole twice daily, and 400 mg moxifloxacin once daily for 7 d. The Hybrid group received 20 mg rabeprazole and 1 g amoxicillin twice daily for 14 d. In addition, the Hybrid group received 500 mg metronidazole and 500 mg clarithromycin twice daily for the final 7 d. Successful eradication of H. pylori infection was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of treatment. Patient compliance was defined as "good" if drug intake was at least 85%. H. pylori eradication rates, patient compliance with treatment, and adverse event rates were evaluated.RESULTS: The eradication rates in the intention-totreat(ITT) analysis were 91.4%(128/140; 95%CI: 90.2%-92.9%) in the MBST group and 79.2%(114/144; 95%CI: 77.3%-80.7%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.013). The eradication rates in the perprotocol(PP) analysis were 94.1%(128/136; 95%CI: 92.9%-95.6%) in the MBST group and 82.6%(114/138; 95%CI: 80.6%-84.1%) in the Hybrid group(P = 0.003). The H. pylori eradication rate in the MBST group was significantly higher than that of the Hybrid group for both the ITT(P = 0.013) and the PP analyses(P = 0.003). Both groups exhibited full compliance with treatment(MBST/Hybrid group: 100%/100%). The rate of adverse events was 11.8%(16/136) and 19.6%(27/138) in the MBST and Hybrid group, respectively(P = 0.019). The majority of adverse events were mild-to-moderate in intensity; none were severe enough to cause discontinuation of treatment in either group.CONCLUSION: MBST was more effective and led to fewer adverse events than hybrid therapy as a first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.     

Hybrid vs sequential therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Taiwan: a prospective randomized trial

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of sequential vs hybrid therapy in patients with Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: From March 2013 to May 2014,one hundred and seventy-five H. pylori infected patients who had not been treated for H. pylori before wererandomized to receive either sequential therapy(rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g twice daily for 5 d,followed by rabeprazole 20 mg,clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 5 d) or hybrid therapy(rabeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for 7 d,followed by rabeprazole 20 mg,amoxicillin 1 g,clarithromycin 500 mg and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 7 d). H. pylori status was confirmed by positive results of both rapid urease test and histology examination or a positive result of culture. Eradication efficacy was assessed by follow-up endoscopy with rapid urease test and histological examination 8 wk after the end of anti-H. pylori therapy,or 13C-urea breath test at least 4 wk after completion of treatment. The primary outcome was H. pylori eradication by intension-to-treat(ITT) and per-protocol(PP) analyses.RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients(83 patients in the sequential group and 84 patients in the hybrid group) completed the study. The compliance rates were 97.6% and 97.7% for the two groups,respectively. The eradication rate was 78.2% for the sequential group and 92% for the hybrid group by ITT analysis(P = 0.01). The eradication rate was 81.9% for the sequential group and 96.4% for the hybrid group by PP analysis(P = 0.01). Univariate analysis for the clinical and bacterial factors did not identify any risk factors associated with treatment failure. Severe adverse events were observed in 2.3% of patients in the sequential group and 2.4% of those in the hybrid group.CONCLUSION: Due to a grade A( 95%) success rate for H. pylori eradication by PP analysis,similar compliance and adverse events,hybrid therapy seems to be an appropriate eradication regimen in Taiwan.     

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy using a single capsule of bismuth biskalcitrate,metronidazole, and tetracycline given with omeprazole versus omeprazole,amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients: a prospective,randomized, multicenter,North American trial

OBJECTIVES: This multicenter, randomized, active-controlled trial assessed efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple therapy with omeprazole, bismuth biskalcitrate, metronidazole, and tetracycline (OBMT) using a single-triple capsule of BMT compared with triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (OAC) in treatment of patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and duodenal ulcers. METHODS: Patients with active duodenal ulcer or diagnosed within the past 5 yr and with infection documented by (13)C-urea breath test plus histology or culture were randomly assigned to 10-day course of OBMT using a single-triple capsule containing bismuth biskalcitrate 140 mg, metronidazole 125 mg, and tetracycline 125 mg given as three capsules q.i.d. with omeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., or a 10-day course of OAC, omeprazole 20 mg plus amoxicillin 1 g plus clarithromycin 500 mg, all b.i.d. Eradication was confirmed by two negative urea breath tests at >1 month and >2 months after therapy. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight patients received OBMT and 137 OAC. Modified intent-to-treat eradication rates were 87.7% for OBMT and 83.2% for OAC (95% CI = -3.9%-12.8%; p = 0.29). OBMT eradicated 91.7% metronidazole-sensitive and 80.4% metronidazole-resistant strains (p = 0.06). OAC eradicated 92.1% clarithromycin sensitive and 21.4% clarithromycin-resistant strains (p < 0.001). Adverse events occurred in 58.5% of OBMT patients and 59.0% of OAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: OBMT regimen using the single-triple capsule is as efficacious and well-tolerated as the widely used OAC regimen for H. pylori eradication. This OBMT therapy largely overcomes H. pylori metronidazole resistance, present in 40% of patients in this study.     

Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomised, multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapies is decreasing. Recently, lactoferrin administration has been shown to significantly increase the cure rate of 7-day rabeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole triple therapy. We assessed whether lactoferrin also increases the eradication rate of 7-day esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin triple therapy as first-line treatment. METHODS: Overall, 133 consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomised to receive either a standard 7-day triple therapy with esomeprazole 20mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (68 patients) or a quadruple therapy comprising of the same regimen plus lactoferrin 200mg b.i.d. (65 patients). H. pylori at entry was assessed by endoscopy, while bacterial eradication was checked by (13)C urea breath test 4-6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication following standard triple therapy was achieved in 53/68 (77.9%; 95% CI = 68-88) and in 53/66 (80.3%; 95% CI = 71-89) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 50/65 (76.9%; 95% CI = 67-87) and 50/64 (78.1%; 95% CI = 68-88) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapeutic regimens, both at ITT (p = 0.9) and PP analyses (p = 0.9). Side effects were complained by seven (10.3%) patients and six (9.2%) patients following the triple and quadruple regimens, respectively (p = 0.9), with only one patient in the quadruple group interrupting the treatment due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin did not significantly increase the H. pylori cure rate of standard 7-day clarithromycin-amoxycillin based triple therapy in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients.     

Comparison of 1- and 2-week pantoprazole-based triple therapies in clarithromycin-sensitive and resistant cases

BACKGROUND: The objectives of this prospective study were: (i) to compare the efficacy of 1-week with 2-week pantoprazole-based triple therapy and (ii) to evaluate the impact of clarithromycin resistance on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates. METHODS: Eighty dyspeptic patients were randomly allocated to two groups. The first group (PAC-1, n=40) received pantoprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, and clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day for one week, and the second group (PAC-2, n=40) received the same regimen for two weeks. Endoscopy was repeated one month after the end of the treatment. RESULTS: DNA extraction for clarithromycin resistance could not be performed in seven cases. Five cases were lost to follow-up. Clarithromycin resistance was found to be 44.1% (15/34) in the PAC-1 group and 58.8% (20/34) in the PAC-2 group (p>0.05). Eradication was achieved in 16 (PP: 47.1%, ITT: 44.4%) and 25 (PP:73.5%, ITT: 67.6%) patients in the PAC-1 and PAC-2 groups, respectively (p>0.05). H. pylori was eradicated in 4 of 15 (PP: 26.7%, ITT: 26.7%) clarithromycin-resistant patients in the PAC-1 group and in 12 of 20 (PP: 60%, ITT: 60%) clarithromycin-resistant patients in the PAC-2 group (p>0.05). Among the clarithromycin-sensitive ones, eradication was achieved in 12 of 19 (PP: 63.2%, ITT: 57.1%) patients in the PAC-1 group and in 13 of 14 (PP: 92.8%, ITT: 76.5%) patients in the PAC-2 group (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Although the 2-week regimen of pantoprazole-based triple therapy was effective for H. pylori eradication in clarithromycin-sensitive cases, highly effective H. pylori eradication protocols are needed for clarithromycin-resistant ones.     

细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性对埃索美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的影响

目的 前瞻性对比埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)的疗效,及细胞色素P450(CYP)2C19基因多态性对根除Hp疗效的影响.方法 240例Hp阳性消化性溃疡患者,随机分为EAC组(埃索美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素)和OAC组(奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素),每组120例,疗程7 d.继后埃索美拉唑或奥美拉唑巩固治疗3周.胃镜观察2周溃疡愈合情况,结束治疗4周后进行13C尿素呼气试验.利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)及限制片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析技术,测定所有患者的CYP2C19基因型,分为强代谢型(Ems)和弱代谢型(PMs),强代谢型包括纯合子(homEM)和杂合子(hetEM).结果 240例患者中225例完成疗效观察.Hp根除率按意向处理分析(ITT),EAC组为88.3%,OAC组为79.2%(P>0.05);按方案分析(PP)EAC组为91.4%,OAC组为87.2 oA(P>0.05).ITT分析显示,在CYP2C19 homEM基因型中,EAC和OAC组Hp根除率分别为91.9%和71.8%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.037).PP分析显示,在homEM基因型中,EAC组和OAC组Hp根除率分别为97.1%和77.8%,两组间差异也有统计学意义(P=0.028).ITT分析显示,EAC组和OAC组2周溃疡愈合率分别为79.2%和69.2%(P>0.05);PP分析显示分别为81.9%和76.1%(P>0.05).EAC组和OAC组不良反应均较少(分别为3.3%和7.5%,P>0.05).结论 EAC方案Hp根除率较高,尤其在CYP2C19 homEM基因型患者,埃索美拉唑优于奥美拉唑.     

细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性对埃索美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的影响

目的 前瞻性对比埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌(Hp)的疗效,及细胞色素P450(CYP)2C19基因多态性对根除Hp疗效的影响.方法 240例Hp阳性消化性溃疡患者,随机分为EAC组(埃索美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素)和OAC组(奥美拉唑、阿莫西林和克拉霉素),每组120例,疗程7 d.继后埃索美拉唑或奥美拉唑巩固治疗3周.胃镜观察2周溃疡愈合情况,结束治疗4周后进行13C尿素呼气试验.利用聚合酶链反应(PCR)及限制片段长度多态性(RFLP)分析技术,测定所有患者的CYP2C19基因型,分为强代谢型(Ems)和弱代谢型(PMs),强代谢型包括纯合子(homEM)和杂合子(hetEM).结果 240例患者中225例完成疗效观察.Hp根除率按意向处理分析(ITT),EAC组为88.3%,OAC组为79.2%(P>0.05);按方案分析(PP)EAC组为91.4%,OAC组为87.2 oA(P>0.05).ITT分析显示,在CYP2C19 homEM基因型中,EAC和OAC组Hp根除率分别为91.9%和71.8%,两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.037).PP分析显示,在homEM基因型中,EAC组和OAC组Hp根除率分别为97.1%和77.8%,两组间差异也有统计学意义(P=0.028).ITT分析显示,EAC组和OAC组2周溃疡愈合率分别为79.2%和69.2%(P>0.05);PP分析显示分别为81.9%和76.1%(P>0.05).EAC组和OAC组不良反应均较少(分别为3.3%和7.5%,P>0.05).结论 EAC方案Hp根除率较高,尤其在CYP2C19 homEM基因型患者,埃索美拉唑优于奥美拉唑.     

Esomeprazole versus omeprazole for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: results of a randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole has higher oral bioavailability and increased antimicrobial activity against Helicobacter pylori than omeprazole. GOALS: To compare 7 days esomeprazole with 7 days of omeprazole based triple therapies for the eradication of H. pylori, and to assess whether the administration of higher dose of esomeprazole leads to improved eradication rates. STUDY: One hundred and fifty-six dyspeptic patients with H. pylori received either: (1) 1-week treatment including esomeprazole 40 mg once daily, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, both twice daily (EAC1 group, n = 52); (2) 1-week treatment of omeprazole 20 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all administered twice daily (OAC group, n = 52); or (3) 1-week treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg, all given twice daily (EAC2 group, n = 52). RESULTS: H. pylori was eradicated in 37 of 52 patients in the OAC group (Intension to treat [ITT] 71%), and in 42 patients in the EAC1 group (ITT 81%). High eradication rate was achieved by the EAC2 regimen (ITT; 96%), but more patients reported unwanted effects. CONCLUSION: Seven days of esomeprazole based triple therapy is a satisfactory eradication regimen for H. pylori infection. Higher doses of esomeprazole have excellent eradication rates, but they may lead to increased side effects.     

含铋剂和克拉霉素的四联根除方案在幽门螺杆菌一线治疗中的作用

背景：近年经典三联方案对幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori）感染的根除疗效明显下降,建立新型、安全和高效的一线标准治疗方案是临床工作的当务之急。目的：评估含铋剂和克拉霉素的四联方案作为H.pylori一线治疗方案的疗效和安全性。方法：120例胃镜诊断为非溃疡性消化不良的H.pylori感染患者随机分为3组：7 d三联组（奥美拉唑20 mgbid＋阿莫西林1000 mg bid＋克拉霉素500 mg bid,疗程7 d）、7 d四联组（7 d三联方案＋枸橼酸铋钾220 mg bid,疗程7 d）和2周四联组（方案同7 d四联组,疗程2周）。治疗结束后至少4周行13C-尿素呼气试验以评估根除疗效。H.pylori分离菌株行克拉霉素、甲硝唑和阿莫西林药敏试验。结果：115例患者按方案完成治疗。7 d三联组、7 d四联组和2周四联组按意向治疗（ITT）分析H.pylori根除率分别为70.0%、75.0%和90.0%,按方案（PP）分析分别为73.7%、76.9%和94.7%。2周四联组ITT和PP根除率均显著高于7 d三联组（P〈0.05）,PP根除率显著高于7 d四联组（P=0.026）,而7 d三联组ITT和PP根除率与7 d四联组相比均无明显差异。H.pylori对克拉霉素、甲硝唑和阿莫西林的耐药率分别为24.2%、48.3%和0%,7 d三联组、7 d四联组和2周四联组对克拉霉素耐药菌株的根除率逐渐升高（37.5%、55.6%、80.0%）,但差异无统计学意义。除2周四联组中1例患者因皮肤过敏而未完成治疗外,其余患者的不良反应相似且轻微,耐受性良好。结论：含铋剂和克拉霉素的2周四联方案可明显提高H.pylori根除疗效,且安全性较高,可作为H.pylori一线治疗的标准方案。     

Is a 7-day Helicobater pylori treatment enough for eradication and inactivation of gastric inflammatory activity？

AIM： To compare the efficacy of a 7-d vs 10-d triple therapy regarding H pylori eradication, endoscopic findings and histological gastric inflammatory inactivation in the Ecuadorian population.
METHODS： 136 patients with dyspepsia and H pylori infection were randomized in 2 groups （68 per group）： group 1, 7-d therapy; group 2, 10-d therapy. Both groups received the same medication and daily dosage： omeprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and amoxicillin 1 g bid. Endoscopy was performed for histological assessment and H pylori infection status before and 8 wk after treatment.
RESULTS： H pylori was eradicated in 68% of group 1 vs 83.8% of group 2 for the intention-to-treat analysis （ITT） （P = 0.03; OR = 2.48; 95% CI, 1.1-5.8）, and 68% in group 1 vs 88% in group 2 for the per-protocol analysis （PP） （P = 0.008; OR = 3.66; 95% CI, 1.4-10）. Endoscopic gastric mucosa normalization was observed in 56.9% in group 1 vs 61.2% in group 2 for ITT, with similar results for the PP, the difference being statistically not significant. The rate of inflammatory inactivation was 69% in group 1 vs 88.7% in group 2 for ITT （P = 0.007; OR = 3.00; 95% CI, 1.2-7.5）, and 69% in group 1 vs96% in group 2 for PP （P = 0.0002; OR = 7.25; 95% CI, 2-26）.
CONCLUSION： In this Ecuadorian population, the 10-d therapy was more effective than the 7-d therapy for H pylori eradication as well as for gastric mucosa inflammatory inactivation.     

Pretreatment antimicrobial susceptibility testing is cost saving in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The major obstacle to 100% effective eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection is represented by antimicrobial-resistant H. pylori strains. This randomized study was designed to evaluate whether regimens based on pretreatment susceptibility testing were more effective and cost saving compared with standard nonsusceptibility testing-based therapy in the eradication of H. pylori infection. METHODS: We studied 150 consecutive H. pylori-infected dyspeptic subjects. Patients were randomly assigned to omeprazole 20 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily for 7 days or to omeprazole 20 mg twice daily and 2 antimicrobials chosen based on susceptibility testing. H. pylori status was reevaluated 12 weeks after the end of treatment by the (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Susceptibility testing-based regimens led to the following results. (1) Eradication rates were 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 91.2%-99.5%) (71 of 73) and 94.6% (95% CI, 87.6%-98.3%) (71 of 75) in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat analysis, respectively. These were significantly higher (P < 0.005) than eradication rates obtained without susceptibility testing, that is, 79.4% (95% CI, 69.1%-87.6%) (58 of 73) and 77.3% (95% CI, 66.9%-85.7%) (58 of 75) in the per-protocol and intention-to-treat analyses, respectively. (2) There were savings of approximately $5 U.S. per patient compared with standard triple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment antimicrobial susceptibility testing is more effective and cost saving and, in health systems that confirm cost advantage, microbial susceptibility testing should be routinely used for eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Efficacy of 14-d vs 7-d moxifloxacin-based triple regimens for second-line Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of the 14-d moxifloxacinbased triple therapy for the second-line eradication of Helicobacter pylori(H. pylori) infection.METHODS: Between 2011 and 2013, we conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of 160 patients who had experienced failure of their first-line proton pump inhibitor-based eradication therapy and subsequently received the moxifloxacin-based triple therapy as a second-line eradication treatment regimen. The patients who were treated with the moxifloxacinbased triple therapy(oral 20 mg rabeprazole b.i.d., 1000 mg amoxicillin b.i.d., and 400 mg moxifloxacin q.d.) for 7 d were assigned to the RAM-7 group(n = 79) while those who took them for 14 days were assigned to RAM-14 group(n = 81). The eradication rates for both groups were determined by intentionto-treat(ITT) and per-protocol(PP) analyses. ITT analysis compared the treatment groups as originally allocated while the PP analysis including only those patients who had completed the treatment as originally allocated. Successful eradication therapy for H. pylori infection was defined as the documentation of a negative 13C-urea breath test 4 wk after the end of the eradication treatment.RESULTS: The overall ITT eradication rate was 76.2%(122/160). The final ITT eradication rates were 70.8%(56/79; 95%CI: 63.3%-77.1%) in the RAM-7 group and 81.4%(66/81; 95%CI: 74.6%-88.3%) in the RAM-14 group(P = 0.034). The overall PP eradication rate was 84.1%(122/145), and the final PP eradication rates were 77.7%(56/72; 95%CI: 70.2%-85.3%) in the RAM-7 group and 90.4%(66/73; 95%CI: 82.8%-98.1%) in the RAM-14 group(P = 0.017). The H. pylori-eradication rates in the RAM-14 group were significantly higher compared with that of the RAM-7 group according to both the ITT(P = 0.034) and the PP analyses(P = 0.017). Both groups exhibited good treatment compliance(RAM-7/RAM-14 group: 100%/100%). The adverse event rates were19.4%(14/72)and 20.5%(15/73)in the RAM-7 and RAM-14 groups,respectively(P=0.441).Adverse events occurred in 14 of the 72 patients(19.4)in the RAM-7 group and in 15 of the 73 patients(20.5)in the RAM-14 group.No statistically significant differences(P=0.441)were observed.CONCLUSION:The 14-d moxifloxacin-based triple therapy is a significantly more effective secondline eradication treatment as compared to the 7-d alternative for H.pylori infection in South Korea.     

The efficacy of bismuth containing quadruple therapy as a first-line treatment option for Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have tended to decrease recently, mostly due to increasing antibiotic-resistance. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy of bismuth-based quadruple regimen with proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimen for eradication of H. pylori. METHODS: Consecutive H. pylori-positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized into one of two regimens: (i) bismuth subsalicylate 300 mg q.i.d., lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. and metronidazole 500 mg t.i.d. (BLTM group) for 14 days; (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg b.i.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d and clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. (LAC) for 14 days. Gastroscopy and (14)C-Urea breath test (UBT) were performed before enrollment, and UBT only was repeated for 6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients were randomized into groups and 212 of them completed the protocols. The 'intention-to-treat' (ITT) and 'per protocol' (PP) H. pylori eradication rates were 70% (95%CI 61-78) and 82.3% (95%CI 74-89) in the BLTM group, and 57.5% (95%CI 48-66) and 62.7% (95%CI 53-71) in the LAC group. The BLTM treatment achieved a significantly better eradication rate compared with LAC treatment in PP analysis (82.3% vs. 62.7%, P = 0.002). Mild to severe side-effects, which were more frequent in the BLTM group, were reported in 18.2% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The bismuth-based quadruple regimen achieved a better eradication rate compared with proton pump inhibitor-based triple regimens as a first-line eradication option for H. pylori in our population.     

序贯疗法与标准四联疗法对幽门螺杆菌根除失败后补救治疗的疗效分析

近年经典三联疗法的幽门螺杆菌（11．pylori）根除疗效明显降低,选择有效补救疗法对Hpylori根除失败者有重要意义。目的：比较序贯疗法与标准四联疗法对且pylori根除失败者的疗效。方法：将98例Hpylori根除失败者随机分为序贯疗法组（前5d予奥美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1000mgbid,后5d予奥美拉唑20mg＋左氧氟沙星200mg＋克拉霉素500mgbid）和标准四联疗法组（予奥美拉唑20mg＋胶体次枸橼酸铋钾220mg＋阿莫西林1000mg＋克拉霉素500mgbid,疗程7d）。停药4周后复查”C一尿素呼气试验,评估Hpylori根除疗效。结果：共95例患者完成方案,序贯疗法组11Tr和PP分析的Hpylori根除率均显著高于标准四联疗法组（ITF：89．8％对71,4％,PP：91．7％对74。5％,P〈0．05）,序贯疗法组临床症状改善的总有效率亦显著高于标准四联疗法组（95．8％对80．9％,P〈0．05）,两组不良反应发生率无明显差异（P〉0．05）。结论：对Hpylori根除治疗失败的患者,序贯疗法和标准四联疗法均可作为有效的补救治疗方案,但10d序贯疗法的疗效优于7d标准四联疗法。     

十二指肠溃疡患者根除幽门螺杆菌后抑酸维持治疗的疗效研究

背景：对感染幽门螺杆菌（H.pylori）的消化性溃疡患者成功根除且H.ylori后,是否应继续行抑酸治疗,目前尚存在争议。目的：探讨合并H.pylori感染的十二指肠溃疡（DU）患者根除H.pylori后抑酸维持治疗的疗效。方法：112例合并H.pylori感染的DU患者随机分为A组和B组,A组给予10d四联疗法：兰索拉唑30mg＋阿莫西林1g＋克拉霉素0．5gbid＋枸橼酸铋钾110mg qid,疗程10d。B组：在A组方案的基础上,疗程结束后再予兰索拉唑30mg,1次／d,维持4周。治疗结束4周后复查胃镜,评估H.pylori根除疗效、溃疡愈合率和腹痛缓解率。结果：109例患者完成方案。A、B两组按意向治疗（ITT）和按方案（PP）分析的H.pylori根除率（ITT：85．7％对87．5％;PP：88．9％对89．1％）和溃疡愈合率（ITT：87．5％对94．6％;PP：90．7％对96．4％）以及腹痛缓解率（95．6％对95．7％）相比差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：以10d四联疗法根除H.pylori后,可使多数DU患者的溃疡愈合,无需进一步行维持抑酸治疗。     

Adjuvant probiotics improve the eradication effect of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM:To investigate whether the addition of probiotics can improve the eradication effect of triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori ) infection. METHODS:This open randomized trial recruited 234 H. pylori positive gastritis patients from seven local centers. The patients were randomized to one-week standard triple therapy (omeprazole 20 mg bid , clarithromycin 500 mg bid , and amoxicillin 1000 mg bid ; OCA group, n = 79); two weeks of pre-treatment with probiotics, containing 3 × 107 Lactobacillus acidophilus per day, prior to one week of triple therapy (POCA group, n = 78); or one week of triple therapy followed by two weeks of the same probiotics (OCAP group, n = 77). Successful eradication was defined as a negative C13 or C14 urease breath test four weeks after triple therapy. Patients were asked to report associated symptoms at baseline and during follow-up, and side effects related to therapy were recorded. Data were analyzed by both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) methods. RESULTS:PP analysis involved 228 patients, 78 in the OCA, 76 in the POCA and 74 in the OCAP group. Successful eradication was observed in 171 patients; by PP analysis, the eradication rates were significantly higher (P = 0.007 each) in the POCA (62/76; 81.6%, 95% CI 72.8%-90.4%) and OCAP (61/74; 82.4%, 95% CI 73.6%-91.2%) groups than in the OCA group (48/78; 61.5%, 95% CI 50.6%-72.4%). ITT analysis also showed that eradication rates were significantly higher in the POCA (62/78; 79.5%, 95% CI 70.4%-88.6%) and OCAP (61/77; 79.2%, 95% CI 70%-88.4%) groups than in the OCA group (48/79; 60.8%, 95% CI 49.9%-71.7%), (P = 0.014 and P = 0.015). The symptom relieving rates in the POCA, OCAP and OCA groups were 85.5%, 89.2% and 87.2%, respectively. Only one of the 228 patients experienced an adverse reaction. CONCLUSION:Administration of probiotics before or after standard triple therapy may improve H. pylori eradication rates.     

Omeprazole triple therapy versus omeprazole quadruple therapy for healing duodenal ulcer and eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection: a 24-month follow-up study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of omeprazole triple therapy versus omeprazole quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-centre, investigator-blind study. SETTINGS: Departments of Gastroenterology and Histopathology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece. METHODS: One hundred and forty-nine consecutive patients with active duodenal ulcer were randomized to receive omeprazole (20 mg b.d.), amoxicillin (1 g b.d.) and clarithromycin (0.5 g b.d.) (OAC, n = 78), or omeprazole (20 mg b.d.), colloidal bismuth subcitrate (120 mg q.i.d.), metronidazole (0.5 g t.i.d.) and tetracycline hydrochloride (0.5 g q.i.d.) (OBMT, n = 71) for 10 days. Patients' symptoms were scored, and compliance and treatment-related side effects were assessed. Endoscopy was performed before treatment and at 10-12 weeks and 12 months after treatment. H. pylori infection and its successful eradication were sought by histology, immunohistochemistry and campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) tests on multiple biopsies taken from the gastric antrum, corpus and fundus. Patients were re-evaluated clinically and underwent a C-urea breath test (UBT) at 21-24 months. Those with dyspepsia and/or recrudescence of H. pylori were re-endoscoped. RESULTS: Patient groups were comparable for age, sex, smoking, occasional use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and current or past bleeding episodes. Six and seven patients in the OAC and OBMT treatment groups, respectively, were lost to follow-up. Eight patients were non-compliant. Two ulcers in the OAC group and one in the OBMT group did not heal. By intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, ulcer healing rates were 86% (67/78) and 97% (67/69), respectively, for the OAC group, and 82% (58/71) and 98% (58/59), respectively, for the OBMT group. H. pylori eradication at 10-12 weeks after treatment was 78% (61/78) and 88% (61/69) for OAC, and 65% (46/71) and 78% (46/59) for OBMT, by ITT and PP analyses, respectively (P > 0.1). Side effects were more common with OBMT. Relapse rates of H. pylori were 3% and 2% for the first and second years, respectively. Four H. pylori-negative patients developed reflux symptoms, but only two developed erosive oesophagitis between 12 and 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: OAC and OBMT were equally effective in healing active duodenal ulcers and eradicating H. pylori, but OAC should be used as a first-line treatment because of its better tolerance.