125 Cases of duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation: a single‐centre experience of an alternative enteric drainage

Several exocrine drainage procedures have been successfully developed to perform pancreas transplantation (PT). Retroperitoneal graft placement allows exocrine drainage via direct duodenoduodenostomy (DD). This technique provides easy access for endoscopic surveillance and biopsy. A total of 241 PT procedures were performed in our centre between 2002 and 2012. DD was performed in 125 patients, and duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in 116 patients. We retrospectively compared our experience with these two types of enteric drainage, focusing on graft and patient survivals, as well as postoperative complications. With a mean follow‐up of 59 months, both groups demonstrated comparable patient and graft survivals. 14 (11%) of 125 cases in the DD group and 21 (18%) of 116 cases in the DJ group had pancreatic graft loss (P = 0.142). Graft thrombosis [5 (4%) vs. 18 (16%) P = 0.002], anastomotic insufficiency [2 (1.6%) vs. 8 (7%) P = 0.052] and relaparotomy [52 (41%) vs. 56 (48%) P = 0.29] occurred more frequently in the DJ group, whereas gastrointestinal bleeding [14 (11%) vs. 4 (3%) P = 0.026] occurred more often in the DD group. DD is a feasible and safe technique in PT, with no increase in enteric complications. It is equivalent to other established techniques and extends the feasibility of anastomotic sites, especially in recipients who have undergone a second transplantation.     

Pancreas Transplantation With Enteroanastomosis to Native Duodenum Poses Technical Challenges—But Offers Improved Endoscopic Access for Scheduled Biopsies and Therapeutic Interventions

To facilitate endoscopic access for rejection surveillance and stenting of the pancreas, we have abandoned the duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in favor of duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). From September 2012 to September 2013 we performed 40 PTx with DD; 20 solitary‐PTx (S‐PTx) and 20 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). We compared the outcomes with results from 40 PTx‐DJ (10 S‐PTx and 30 SPK) from the preceding era. The DD‐enteroanastomoses were performed successfully. Endoscopic pancreas biopsies (endoscopic ultrasound examination [EUS]) yielded representative material in half of the cases. One exocrine fistula was treated by endoscopic stenting. PTxs‐DD were associated with a higher rate of thrombosis compared to PTx‐DJ (23% vs. 5%) and reoperations (48% vs. 30%), as well as inferior graft survival (80% vs. 88%). Time on waiting list, HLA A + B mismatches and reoperations were associated with graft loss. Only recipient age remained an independent predictor of patient death in multivariate analysis. PTx‐DD showed a higher rate of thrombosis and inferior results, but facilitated a protocol biopsy program by EUS that was feasible and safe. Given that technical difficulties can be solved, the improved endoscopic access might confer long‐term benefits, yet this remains to be proven.     

Effect of donor pancreas extraction time on pancreas transplantation—a Swiss tertiary center experience

We aimed to assess the effect of donor pancreas extraction time (ET) on postoperative complications and graft function after pancreas transplantation (PT). We analyzed all consecutive donor pancreas procurements for the simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and the associated PT in a Swiss transplant center over a 20-year period. Pancreas ET was defined as the time from cold flush to static storage of the pancreas on ice. The primary endpoint was the effect of extraction time on surgical complications. Secondary endpoints comprised the effect of ET on graft function (insulin-free survival) and graft pancreatitis. Of 115 procured pancreas grafts the median donor pancreas ET was 65 min (IQR: 48–78 min). In multivariable analysis, ET did not negatively affect major complications (OR 1.41 [95% CI: .59–3.36]; p = .438) and insulin-free survival (HR 1.42 [95% CI: .55–3.63]; p = .459). The median CIT was 522 (441–608) min. CIT was associated with major complications (OR 2.51 [95% CI: 1.11–5.68]; p = .027), but without impact on insulin-free survival (HR 1.94 [95% CI: .84–4.48]; p = .119). Patients with and without graft pancreatitis had no statistically significant differences in ET and CIT (p = .164 and p = .47, respectively). In multivariable analysis, Amylase levels > 270 U/L on postoperative day 1 were significantly associated with major complications (OR 3.61 [95% CI: 1.06–12.32]; p = .040). Our results suggest that although no effect of ET on complications and graft function after PT was found, shorter CIT and less graft pancreatitis can have a positive impact on surgical complications. Results could possibly be influenced by the exceptional quality of the pancreas donors, with short travel distances and preservation times in Switzerland.     

Preemptive treatment of early donor‐specific antibodies with IgA‐ and IgM‐enriched intravenous human immunoglobulins in lung transplantation

This retrospective study presents our 4‐year experience of preemptive treatment of early anti‐HLA donor specific antibodies with IgA‐ and IgM‐enriched immunoglobulins. We compared outcomes between patients with antibodies and treatment (case patients) and patients without antibodies (control patients). Records of patients transplanted at our institution between March 2013 and November 2017 were reviewed. The treatment protocol included one single 2 g/kg immunoglobulin infusion followed by successive 0.5 g/kg infusions for a maximum of 6 months, usually combined with a single dose of anti‐CD20 antibody and, in case of clinical rejection or positive crossmatch, with plasmapheresis or immunoabsorption. Among the 598 transplanted patients, 128 (21%) patients formed the case group and 452 (76%) the control group. In 116 (91%) patients who completed treatment, 106 (91%) showed no antibodies at treatment end. Fourteen (13%) patients showed antibody recurrence thereafter. In case versus control patients and at 4‐year follow‐up, respectively, graft survival (%) was 79 versus 81 (P = .59), freedom (%) from biopsy‐confirmed rejection 57 versus 53 (P = .34), and from chronic lung allograft dysfunction 82 versus 78 (P = .83). After lung transplantation, patients with early donor‐specific antibodies and treated with IgA‐ and IgM‐enriched immunoglobulins had 4‐year graft survival similar to patients without antibodies and showed high antibody clearance.     

Outcomes after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation from donation after circulatory death donors: A UK registry analysis

There are concerns that simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have a higher risk of graft failure than those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. A UK registry analysis of SPK transplants between 2005 and 2018 was performed. Pancreas survivals of those receiving organs from DCD or DBD donors were compared. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and to identify factors associated with pancreas graft loss. A total of 2228 SPK transplants were implanted; 403 (18.1%) were from DCD donors. DCD donors were generally younger, slimmer, less likely to have stroke as a cause of death, with lower terminal creatinines and shorter pancreas cold ischemic times than DBD donors. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (1.6–8.1) years. On univariable analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival between the two donor types (79.5% versus 80.4%; p = .86). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year pancreas graft loss between transplants from DCD (n = 343) and DBD (n = 1492) donors (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.76–1.23; p = .12). The findings from this study support the increased use of SPK transplants from DCD donors.     

The influence of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in pancreas transplantation in England: Registry data analysis

Socioeconomic deprivation is associated with poorer outcomes in chronic diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes following pancreas transplantation among patients transplanted in England. We included all 1270 pancreas recipients transplanted between 2004 and 2012. We used the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (EIMD) score to assess the influence of socioeconomic deprivation on patient and pancreas graft survival. Higher scores mean higher deprivation status. Median EIMD score was 18.8, 17.7, and 18.1 in patients who received simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK), pancreas after kidney (PAK), and pancreas transplant alone (PTA), respectively (P = .56). Pancreas graft (censored for death) survival was dependent on the donor age (P = .08), cold ischemic time (CIT; P = .0001), the type of pancreas graft (SPK vs. PAK or PTA, P = .0001), and EIMD score (P = .02). The 5‐year pancreas graft survival of the most deprived patient quartile was 62% compared to 75% among the least deprived (P = .013), and it was especially evident in the SPK group. EIMD score also correlated with patient survival (P = .05). When looking at the impact of individual domains of deprivation, we determined that “Environment” (P = .037) and “Health and Disability” (P = .035) domains had significant impact on pancreas graft survival. Socioeconomic deprivation, as expressed by the EIMD is an independent factor for pancreas graft and patient survival.     

Outcomes of kidney retransplantation in recipients with prior posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders: An analysis of the 2000–2019 UNOS/OPTN database

This study utilized the UNOS database to assess clinical outcomes after kidney retransplantation in patients with a history of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD). Among second kidney transplant patients from 2000 to 2019, 254 had history of PTLD in their first kidney transplant, whereas 28,113 did not. After a second kidney transplant, PTLD occurred in 2.8% and 0.8% of patients with and without history of PTLD, respectively (p = .001). Over a median follow-up time of 4.5 years after a second kidney transplant, 5-year death-censored graft failure was 9.5% vs. 12.6% (p = .21), all-cause mortality was 8.3% vs. 11.8% (p = .51), and 1-year acute rejection was 11.0% vs. 9.3% (p = .36) in the PTLD vs. non-PTLD groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in death-censored graft failure, mortality, and acute rejection between PTLD and non-PTLD groups in adjusted analysis and after propensity score matching. We conclude that graft survival, patient survival, and acute rejection after kidney retransplantation are comparable between patients with and without history of PTLD, but PTLD occurrence after kidney retransplantation remains higher in patients with history of PTLD.     

A donor risk index for graft loss in pediatric living donor kidney transplantation

Pediatric kidney transplant candidates often have multiple potential living donors (LDs); no evidence‐based tool exists to compare potential LDs, or to decide between marginal LDs and deceased donor (DD) kidney transplantation (KT). We developed a pediatric living kidney donor profile index (P‐LKDPI) on the same scale as the DD KDPI by using Cox regression to model the risk of all‐cause graft loss as a function of living donor characteristics and DD KDPI. HLA‐B mismatch (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] per mismatch = _1.041.27_1.55), HLA‐DR mismatch (aHR per mismatch = _1.021.23_1.49), ABO incompatibility (aHR = _1.203.26_8.81), donor systolic blood pressure (aHR per 10 mm Hg = _1.011.07_1.18), and donor estimated GFR (eGFR; aHR per 10 mL/min/1.73 m² = _0.880.94_0.99) were associated with graft loss after LDKT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) P‐LKDPI was ?25 (?56 to 12). 68% of donors had P‐LKDPI <0 (less risk than any DD kidney) and 25% of donors had P‐LKDPI >14 (more risk than median DD kidney among pediatric KT recipients during the study period). Strata of LDKT recipients of kidneys with higher P‐LKDPI had a higher cumulative incidence of graft loss (39% at 10 years for P‐LDKPI ≥20, 28% for 20> P‐LKDPI ≥?20, 23% for ?20 > P‐LKDPI ≥?60, 19% for P‐LKDPI <?60 [log rank P < .001]). The P‐LKDPI can aid in organ selection for pediatric KT recipients by allowing comparison of potential LD and DD kidneys.     

Early technical pancreas failure in Simultaneous Pancreas–Kidney Recipients does not impact renal allograft outcomes

Early pancreas loss in simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplants has been associated with longer perioperative recovery and reduced kidney allograft function. We assessed the impact of early pancreas allograft failure on transplant outcomes in a contemporary cohort of SPK patients (n = 218). Early pancreas allograft loss occurred in 12.8% (n = 28) of recipients. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common (21.4% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.03) in the early pancreas loss group, but there were no differences in hospital length of stay (median 6.5 vs. 7.0, p = 0.22), surgical wound complications (p = 0.12), or rejection episodes occurring in the first year (p = 0.87). Despite differences in DGF, both groups had excellent renal function at 1 year post‐transplant (eGFR 64.1 ± 20.8 vs. 65.8 ± 22.9, p = 0.75). There were no differences in patient (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.18–1.87, p = 0.26) or kidney allograft survival (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.23–3.06, p = 0.77). One‐ and 2‐year protocol kidney biopsies were comparable between the groups and showed minimal chronic changes; the early pancreas loss group showed more cv changes at 2 years (p = 0.04). Current data demonstrate good outcomes and excellent kidney allograft function following early pancreas loss.     

Comparing outcomes of third and fourth kidney transplantation in older and younger patients

Performing third or fourth kidney transplantation (3KT and 4KT) in older patients is rare due to surgical and immunologic challenges. We aimed to analyze and compare the outcomes of younger (18–64 years) and older (≥65 years) recipients of 3KT and 4KT. Between 1990 and 2016, we identified 5816 recipients of 3KTs (153 were older) and 886 recipients of 4KTs (18 were older). The incidences of delayed graft function (24.3% vs. 24.8%, p = .89), primary non-function (3.2% vs. 1.3%, p = .21), 1-year acute rejection (18.6% vs. 14.8%, p = .24), and 5-year death censored graft failure (DCGF) (24.8% vs. 17.9%, p = .06) were not different between younger and older recipients of 3KT. However, 5-year mortality was higher in older recipients (14.0% vs. 33.8%, p < .001) which remained significant after adjustment (aHR = 3.21, 95% CI: 2.59–3.99). Similar patterns were noted in the 4KT cohort. When compared with waitlisted patients, 3KT and 4KT are associated with a lower risk of mortality; aHR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.33–0.41 and aHR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.24–0.41, respectively. This survival benefit did not differ by recipient age (younger vs. older, p for interaction = 3KT: .49 and 4KT: .58). In the largest cohort described to date, we report that there is a survival benefit of 3KT and 4KT even among older patients. Although a highly selected cohort, our results support improving access to 3KT and 4KT.     

Pre- and post-transplant monitoring of granzyme B enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay in pediatric liver recipients

This study aims to investigate potential role of granzyme B enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (GrB ELISPOT) for immunological monitoring in pediatric liver transplantation.Patients and methodsPeripheral blood mononuclear cells from 28 pediatric recipients were serially tested for GrB-producing donor-reactive cells at day 0 pre-transplantation (baseline) and days 7, 14, and 28 post-transplantation.ResultsAt baseline, no difference of GrB value was found in acute rejection (14/28) compared to normal graft function patients (day 0: 4(3.9) spots versus 5(2.9) spots, respectively: p = 0.65). At day 7 post-transplantation, acute rejection patients showed frequencies of GrB ELISPOT higher than those with normal graft function, but the differences observed were not statistically significant (day 7: 15(4.9) spots versus 10(4.0) spots, respectively: p = 0.55). GrB increased significantly at day 7 from baseline in the rejection group (15(4.9) spots versus 4(3.9), respectively p = 0.04), whereas corresponding changes were not significant in the group without rejection (10(4.0) versus 5(2.9), respectively: p = 0.15). Conclusion: GrB ELISPOT pre-transplantation could not predict the occurrence of early post-transplant acute rejection; similarly frequencies at days 7, 14 and 28 could not be correlated with acute rejection in pediatric liver recipients. However, a kinetic study of GrB ELISPOT could be helpful to predict or confirm early rejection in the small group of liver allograft recipients analyzed in this study.     

Pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies are detrimental to kidney allograft only when persistent after transplantation

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) increase the risk of allograft rejection and graft failure. They may be present before transplant or develop de novo after transplantation. Here, we studied the evolution of preformed DSA and their impact on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Using the Luminex Single Antigen assay, we analyzed the sera on the day of transplantation of 239 patients who received a kidney transplant. Thirty‐seven patients (15.5%) had pre‐existing DSA detected the day of transplantation. After 5 years, the pre‐existing DSA disappeared in 22 patients whereas they persisted in 12. Variables associated with DSA persistence were age <50 years (P = 0.009), a history of previous transplantation (P = 0.039), the presence of class II DSA (P = 0.009), an MFI of preformed DSA >3500 (P < 0.001), and the presence of two or more DSA (P < 0.001). DSA persistence was associated with a higher risk of graft loss and antibody‐mediated rejection. Previously undetected preformed DSA are deleterious to graft survival only when they persist after transplantation.     

Sirolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in primary combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Results of a long‐term prospective randomized study

The study was intended to compare pancreas graft survival rates in two groups of pancreas and kidney transplant recipients prospectively randomized to treatment either with sirolimus or MMF. From 2002 to 2013, 238 type 1 diabetic recipients with end‐stage kidney disease were randomized 1:1 to sirolimus or MMF treatment. Noncensored pancreas survival at 5 years was 76.4 and 71.6% for sirolimus and MMF groups, respectively (P > .05). Death‐censored pancreas survival was better in the sirolimus group (P = .037). After removal of early graft losses pancreas survival did not differ between groups (MMF 83.1% vs sirolimus 91.6%, P = .11). Nonsignificantly more grafts were lost due to rejection in the MMF group (10 vs 5; P = .19). Cumulative patient 5‐year survival was 96% in the MMF group and 91% in the sirolimus group (P > .05). Five‐year cumulative noncensored kidney graft survival rates did not statistically differ (85.6% in the sirolimus group and 88.8% in MMF group). Recipients treated with MMF had significantly more episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding (7 vs 0, P = .007). More recipients in the sirolimus group required corrective surgery due to incisional hernias (21 vs 12, P = .019). ClinicalTrials No.: NCT 03582878.     

Subclass analysis of donor HLA‐specific IgG in antibody‐incompatible renal transplantation reveals a significant association of IgG4 with rejection and graft failure

Donor HLA‐specific antibodies (DSAs) can cause rejection and graft loss after renal transplantation, but their levels measured by the current assays are not fully predictive of outcomes. We investigated whether IgG subclasses of DSA were associated with early rejection and graft failure. DSA levels were determined pretreatment, at the day of peak pan‐IgG level and at 30 days post‐transplantation in eighty HLA antibody‐incompatible kidney transplant recipients using a modified microbead assay. Pretreatment IgG₄ levels were predictive of acute antibody‐mediated rejection (P = 0.003) in the first 30 days post‐transplant. Pre‐treatment presence of IgG₄ DSA (P = 0.008) and day 30 IgG₃ DSA (P = 0.03) was associated with poor graft survival. Multivariate regression analysis showed that in addition to pan‐IgG levels, total IgG₄ levels were an independent risk factor for early rejection when measured pretreatment, and the presence of pretreatment IgG₄ DSA was also an independent risk factor for graft failure. Pretreatment IgG₄ DSA levels correlated independently with higher risk of early rejection episodes and medium‐term death‐censored graft survival. Thus, pretreatment IgG₄ DSA may be used as a biomarker to predict and risk stratify cases with higher levels of pan‐IgG DSA in HLA antibody‐incompatible transplantation. Further investigations are needed to confirm our results.     

Graft and patient outcomes of zero‐human leucocyte‐antigen‐mismatched deceased and live donor kidney transplant recipients

Greater compatibility of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles between kidney donors and recipients may lead to improved graft outcomes. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute rejection and graft failure in zero‐HLA‐mismatched recipients of living‐related (LD) and deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we compared the risk of any acute rejection and biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) and graft failure in recipients of zero‐HLA‐mismatched kidneys between LD and DD using logistic and Cox regression models. Of the 931 zero‐HLA‐mismatched recipients transplanted between 1990 and 2012, 19 (2.0%) received kidneys from monozygotic/dizygotic twins (twin), 500 (53.7%) from nontwin LD and 412 (44.3%) from DD. Twin kidney transplant recipients did not experience rejection. Compared to DD transplant recipients, the risk of any acute rejection (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95%CI 0.34–0.79, P = 0.002) and overall graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95%CI 0.41–0.73, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in LD recipients independent of initial immunosuppression, but not for BPAR (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95%CI 0.16–1.64, P = 0.263). Zero‐HLA‐mismatched DD kidney transplant recipients have a significantly higher risk of any acute rejection episodes and graft loss compared to zero‐HLA‐mismatched LD kidney transplant recipients. A cautious and careful approach in reducing immunosuppression appears to be warranted in this group of transplant recipients.     

Meta-analysis and meta-regression of outcomes for adult living donor liver transplantation versus deceased donor liver transplantation

Prior single center or registry studies have shown that living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) decreases waitlist mortality and offers superior patient survival over deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT). The aim of this study was to compare outcomes for adult LDLT and DDLT via systematic review. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine patient survival and graft survival, MELD, waiting time, technical complications, and postoperative infections. Out of 8600 abstracts, 19 international studies comparing adult LDLT and DDLT published between 1/2005 and 12/2017 were included. U.S. outcomes were analyzed using registry data. Overall, 4571 LDLT and 66,826 DDLT patients were examined. LDLT was associated with lower mortality at 1, 3, and 5 years posttransplant (5-year HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.81–0.93], p < .0001), similar graft survival, lower MELD at transplant (p < .04), shorter waiting time (p < .0001), and lower risk of rejection (p = .02), with a higher risk of biliary complications (OR 2.14, p < .0001). No differences were observed in rates of hepatic artery thrombosis. In meta-regression analysis, MELD difference was significantly associated with posttransplant survival (R² 0.56, p = .02). In conclusion, LDLT is associated with improved patient survival, less waiting time, and lower MELD at LT, despite posing a higher risk of biliary complications that did not affect survival posttransplant.     

Lower tacrolimus exposure and time in therapeutic range increase the risk of de novo donor‐specific antibodies in the first year of kidney transplantation

De novo donor‐specific antibodies (dnDSAs) have been associated with reduced graft survival. Tacrolimus (TAC)–based regimens are the most common among immunosuppressive approaches used in in clinical practice today, yet an optimal therapeutic dose to prevent dnDSAs has not been established. We evaluated mean TAC C₀ (tacrolimus trough concentration) and TAC time in therapeutic range for the risk of dnDSAs in a cohort of 538 patients in the first year after kidney transplantation. A mean TAC C₀ < 8 ng/mL was associated with dnDSAs by 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32–4.79, P = .005) and by 12 months (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.30–4.15, P = .004), and there was a graded increase in risk with lower mean TAC C₀. TAC time in the therapeutic range of <60% was associated with dnDSAs (OR 2.05, 95% CI 1.28‐3.30, P = .003) and acute rejection (hazard ratio [HR] 4.18, 95% CI 2.31–7.58, P < .001) by 12 months and death‐censored graft loss by 5 years (HR 3.12, 95% CI 1.53–6.37, P = .002). TAC minimization may come at a cost of higher rates of dnDSAs, and TAC time in therapeutic range may be a valuable strategy to stratify patients at increased risk of adverse outcomes.     

Duodenoduodenostomy in pancreas transplantation

Enteric drainage (ED) using duodenojejunostomy (DJ) is an established technique in pancreatic transplantation. Duodenoduodenostomy (DD), an alternative ED technique, may provide unique advantages over DJ. We compared our experience with these two types of ED through a retrospective review of all pancreas transplants performed at our institution from November 2007 to November 2009. The allograft duodenum was anastomosed to the recipient jejunum or duodenum. Duodenal drainage was performed by a stapled or hand-sewn technique. Patient demographics, operative times, major post-operative complications, and graft survival data were analyzed. Of 57 pancreas transplants, DJ was performed in 36 patients, stapled DD in 14 patients, and hand-sewn DD in seven patients. Two DD grafts (9.5%) thrombosed compared with no DJ grafts (p = NS). Enteric leak and small-bowel obstruction occurred in 3 of 36 DJ patients and in two DD patients (p = NS). Gastrointestinal bleeding occurred more frequently in stapled DD compared with DJ (4 vs. 0, p < 0.015). In conclusion, DD is technically feasible with no increase in operative time or enteric complications. GI bleeding rates appear to be higher following DD (stapled) technique. Potential complications of DD should be balanced against the benefits conferred by this technique.     

Outcomes analysis of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in transplant patients

Background and aim  Postoperative wound complications are minimized after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) while maintaining low recurrence rates and acceptable morbidity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of LVHR in patients after organ transplantation in comparison to a large cohort of nontransplantation patients after LVHR. Methods  A retrospective, institutional review board (IRB)-approved review was performed on 347 patients who underwent LVHR between July 2000 and December 2007. Results  LVHR was successfully completed in 38/38 transplantation patients (n = 21 liver, n = 5 cardiac, n = 8 kidney, n = 1 lung/kidney, n = 2 kidney/pancreas, n = 1 double lung) without conversion and in 301/309 (97.4%) nontransplant patients. Previous hernia repairs were attempted in 5/38 (13.2%) of the transplant patients and 108/309 (35.0%) of nontransplantation patients. Mean defect size was 256 cm² (p < 0.00001) and mesh size 780 cm² (p < 0.00001) in the transplantation patients, and 140 cm² and 426 cm² in nontransplantation patients, respectively. Mean operating time was similar between the two groups (216.9 min versus 184.0 min). Perioperative complication rate was similar between groups (34.2% versus 34.3%, p = 1.0). There were three (1.0%) mesh infections and two (0.6%) mortalities in the nontransplantation patients and one mesh infection and no mortalities in the transplantation group. At mean follow-up of 20.0 (range 1.1–41) months in the transplantation group and 5.0 (range 1–38) months in the nontransplantation group, the hernia recurrence rate was 7.9% and 2.9%, respectively (p = 0.1330). Conclusion  Perioperative complication and hernia recurrence rates in transplant patients after LVHR are comparable to nontransplant patients, although the transplantation patients had significantly larger hernias. LVHR should be considered to manage ventral incisional hernias post transplantation.