Intravascular ultrasonic predictors of angiographic restenosis after long coronary stenting

The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) criteria for stent optimization have not been determined in stenting long lesions. We evaluated the predictors of angiographic restenosis and compared it with stent lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and stent length between short (stent length <20 mm) and long (> or =20 mm) coronary stenting. IVUS-guided coronary stenting was successfully performed in 285 consecutive patients with 304 native coronary lesions. Six-month follow-up angiogram was performed in 236 patients (82.8%) with 246 lesions (80.9%). Results were evaluated using conventional (clinical, angiographic, and IVUS) methods. The overall angiographic restenosis rate was 22.8% (56 of 246 lesions) (short stent 17.6% vs. long stent 32.2%, p = 0.009). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the independent predictors of angiographic restenosis were the IVUS stent lumen CSA (odds ratio 1.51, 95% confidence intervals 1.18 to 1.92, p = 0.001) and stent length (odds ratio 0.95, 95% confidence intervals 0.91 to 1.00, p = 0.039). The angiographic restenosis rate was 54.8% for stent lumen CSA of <5.0 mm2 (short stent 37.5% vs. long stent 73.3%, p = 0.049), 27.4% for CSA between 5.0 and 7.0 mm2 (short stent 24.1% vs. long stent 31.7%, p = 0.409), 10.5% for CSA between 7.0 and 9.0 mm2 (short stent 10.0% vs. long stent 12.5%, p = 0.772), and 11.4% for stent lumen CSA of > or =9.0 mm2 (short stent 10.4% vs. long stent 13.3%, p = 0.767) (p = 0.001). Compared with short coronary stenting, long coronary stenting is effective treatment modality to cover long lesions with comparable long-term clinical outcomes in cases of stent lumen CSA of > or =7.0 mm2. Regardless of the stent length, the most important factor determining angiographic restenosis was the IVUS stent lumen CSA in relatively large coronary artery lesions.     

Preventive mechanisms and effects of pemirolast potassium on restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: serial coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound studies

Pemirolast potassium, an antiallergic agent, has preventive effects against restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). This study investigated the mechanism of the preventive effects of pemirolast on restenosis using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Initial elective PTCA was performed in consecutive 106 patients from March 1996 through August 1997. Patients with type C lesions or graft stenosis were excluded from the study. A total of 97 patients with 110 lesions, 48 patients (56 lesions) in the pemirolast treated group and 49 patients (54 lesions) in the control group were analyzed. Restenosis was defined as a diameter stenosis of > or = 50% at follow-up study. Patients in the pemirolast group received 20 mg/day from the morning after angioplasty until the time of follow-up (mean 6 months). The lumen cross-sectional area, vessel area, plaque area, and % plaque area were measured by quantitative coronary ultrasound and compared after PTCA and at follow-up between the patients without restenosis in the pemirolast (28 lesions) and control (27 lesions) groups. There was no significant change in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups. Restenosis rate per lesion was significantly lower in the pemirolast group than in the control group (23.2% vs 44.4%, p < 0.05, respectively). After angioplasty and at follow-up study, there was no difference in lumen and vessel cross-sectional areas between the 2 groups. However, plaque and % plaque area in the pemirolast group were smaller than in the control group at follow-up study (8.9 +/- 2.3 vs 11.8 +/- 3.5 mm2, p < 0.005, 56.0 +/- 9.0% vs 64.0 +/- 10.4%, p < 0.005, respectively). These results suggest that suppression of neointimal hyperplasia is the preventive mechanism of pemirolast against restenosis after angioplasty. Pemirolast may be more effective against restenosis after coronary stenting.     

Stenting after directional coronary atherectomy compared with directional coronary atherectomy alone and stenting alone: a serial intravascular ultrasound study.

BACKGROUND: Directional coronary atherectomy prior to stent implantation (DCA-stent) is expected to be an effective approach to reduce restenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether DCA-stent has advantages over DCA alone or stenting alone using serial intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Serial (pre-, post- and follow-up) IVUS was performed in 187 native coronary lesions treated with each of the 3 strategies. External elastic membrane cross-sectional area (CSA), lumen CSA and plaque CSA were measured. Baseline characteristics were similar. Postprocedural lumen CSA was largest after DCA-stent (11.2+/-2.7 mm2) and DCA (10.8+/-2.5 mm2) than stenting alone (9.0+/-2.9 mm2) (p<0.0005). Follow-up lumen loss was similar. As a result, follow-up lumen CSA was largest after DCA-stent (DCA-stent: 9.1+/-3.4 mm2, DCA: 7.8+/-4.2 mm2, stent: 6.3+/-2.6 mm2, p<0.0005). There was a trend toward a lower rate of restenosis with DCA-stent (DCA-stent, 12.5%; DCA, 18.3%; stent, 18.8%; p=0.57). CONCLUSIONS: DCA-stent is superior to both DCA alone and stent alone in terms of the ability to gain a larger lumen as assessed by IVUS.     

Impact of preinterventional arterial remodeling on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia and in-stent restenosis after coronary stent implantation.

BACKGROUND: Patterns of arterial remodeling during the course of plaque development have been shown to play an important role in both the progression of de novo atherosclerosis and in the restenotic process following coronary intervention. The aim of the present prospective study was to evaluate the effect of pre-interventional arterial remodeling on in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) and in-stent restenosis (ISR) after stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre-interventional arterial remodeling was assessed in 85 native coronary lesions by using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). The remodeling index (RI) was 1.09+/-0.20 in the positive remodeling (PR)/intermediate remodeling (IR) group and 0.84+/-0.12 in the negative remodeling (NR) group. The plaque plus media cross sectional area (P&M CSA) at pre-intervention and NIH CSA at follow-up in the minimal lumen CSA were significantly larger in the PR/IR group (9.2+/-2.9 mm2 vs 6.2+/-1.8 mm2, 3.3+/-1.2 mm2 vs 1.5+/-0.9 mm2; p = 0.001, p = 0.001, respectively). On 3-dimensional analysis of IVUS images at follow-up, the lumen volume was significantly smaller in the PR/IR group than that in the NR group (62+/-15 mm3 vs 75 +/-20 mm3; p = 0.001), and neointima hyperplasia volume was significantly larger in the PR/IR group than that in the NR group (46+/-15 mm3 vs 26+/-10 mm3; p = 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between pre-interventional RI and follow-up NIH CSA (r = 0.25, p = 0.022). The incidence of ISR and repeat intervention was significantly higher in the PR/IR group (30.8% vs 18.2%, 28.8% vs 15.2%; p = 0.032, 0.035, respectively). CONCLUSION: Measuring pre-interventional arterial remodeling patterns by IVUS may be helpful to stratify lesions at high-risk of ISR.     

A porcine coronary stent model of increased neointima formation in the left anterior descending coronary artery

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials suggest an increased frequency of restenosis after coronary intervention in left anterior descending (LAD) compared to the left circumflex or right coronary arteries. Experimental studies correlate stent-induced arterial injury and the extent of neointima formation. This study investigates whether the coronary artery affects the relationship between arterial injury and neointima hyperplasia in the porcine stent model. METHODS: Non-lipemic farm pigs underwent stent placement in the LAD (n = 26) and the right coronary artery (RCA; n = 30). Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed before and after stent placement, and at follow-up; quantitative histomorphometry and injury score were analyzed at 30-day follow-up. RESULTS: Initial procedure balloon/artery ratios (LAD 1.17 +/- 0.11 vs RCA 1.17 +/- 0.09, P = NS), and minimal stent lumen diameters (MLD; LAD 2.91 +/- 0.31 vs RCA: 2.93 +/- 0.28 mm, P = NS) were similar suggesting no difference in deployment technique. At follow-up there was more restenosis in the LAD (diameter stenosis: 55.0 +/- 26.4% vs 37.3 +/- 18.1%, and MLD: 1.24 +/- 0.78 mm vs. 1.71 +/- 0.57 mm, P < 0.05 for both comparisons). No differences were seen for injury score (1.09 +/- 0.51 vs 1.01 +/- 0.57; LAD vs RCA) or stent area (6.13 +/- 0.99 vs 6.55 +/- 1.42 mm2). Histomorphometry demonstrated smaller lumen area (2.15 +/- 0.94 vs 2.96 +/- 1.29 mm2) and thicker neointima (0.63 +/- 0.25 vs 0.51 +/- 0.17 mm; all P < 0.05) in the LAD. Multiple linear regression analysis identified the LAD as an independent predictive factor for increased neointima formation. CONCLUSIONS: These observations establish an animal model that is consistent with clinical experience showing that restenosis after stenting is more common in the LAD. The findings may be useful for understanding and developing systemic and local antirestenotic strategies.     

Coronary intervention in the diabetic patient: improved outcome following stent implantation compared with balloon angioplasty

BACKGROUND: Diabetic patients undergoing coronary interventional procedures are at increased risk of restenosis and adverse clinical events. The relative impact of stents compared with balloon angioplasty on the outcome of percutaneous intervention in diabetics remains controversial. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine whether stent placement was superior to balloon angioplasty in reducing restenosis of diabetic patients undergoing coronary intervention. METHODS: The STRESS Trial was a prospective randomized comparison of stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of new native coronary lesions. Of 594 randomized patients. 92 (16%) were diabetic. In this substudy analysis of the STRESS Trial, the outcomes after stenting and balloon angioplasty in diabetic patients were compared. The primary endpoint was restenosis as determined by angiography at 6 months. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were assessed. RESULTS: Procedural success was achieved in 82% of diabetic patients assigned to angioplasty and in 100% assigned to stenting (p < 0.01). Compared with angioplasty, stenting resulted in a larger postprocedural lumen diameter (2.34 +/- 0.44 vs. 1.87 +/- 0.52 mm, p < 0.001) and greater acute luminal gain (1.61 +/- 0.47 vs. 1.06 +/- 0.46 mm, p < 0.001). At 6 months, stenting conferred a larger lumen (1.69 +/- 0.57 vs. 1.38 +/- 0.60 mm, p = 0.03) and greater net luminal gain (0.97 +/- 0.55 vs. 0.52 +/- 0.52 mm, p < 0.001). Restenosis occurred in 60% of the angioplasty group and in 24% of the stent group (p < 0.01). This was accompanied by a lower need for repeat target vessel revascularization after stenting (31 vs. 13%, p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with balloon angioplasty, stent placement in diabetic patients with focal de novo lesions resulted in superior procedural results, reduced restenosis, and improved clinical outcome with fewer repeat revascularization procedures.     

Intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with provisional spot stenting for treatment of long coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the approach of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with spot stenting (SS) for the treatment of long coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Treating long coronary lesions with balloon angioplasty results in suboptimal short- and long-term outcomes. Full lesion coverage with traditional stenting (TS) has been associated with a high restenosis rate. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a consecutive series of 130 long lesions (>15 mm) in 101 patients treated with IVUS-guided PTCA and SS. The results were compared with those of TS in a matched group of patients. Coronary angioplasty was performed with a balloon to vessel ratio of 1:1, according to the IVUS media-to-media diameter of the vessel at the lesion site, to achieve prespecified IVUS criteria: lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) > or =5.5 mm(2) or > or =50% of the vessel CSA at the lesion site. The stents were implanted only in the vessel segment where the criteria were not met. RESULTS: In the SS group, stents were implanted in 67 of 130 lesions, and the mean stent length was shorter than that of lesions in the matched TS group (10.4 +/- 13 mm vs. 32.4 +/- 13 mm, p < 0.005). The 30-day major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was similar (5%) for both groups. Angiographic restenosis was 25% with IVUS-guided SS, as compared with 39% in the TS group (p < 0.05). Follow-up MACE and target lesion revascularization rates were lower in the SS group than in the TS group (22% vs. 38% [p < 0.05] and 19% vs. 34% [p < 0.05], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound-guided SS for the treatment of long coronary lesions is associated with good acute outcome. Angiographic restenosis and follow-up MACE rates were significantly lower than those with TS.     

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.     

Serial intravascular ultrasound comparison of the extent and distribution of intimal hyperplasia six months after stent implantation for de novo versus in-stent restenosis lesions

The aim of this study was to compare intimal hyperplasia (IH) growth at 6 months in patients with de novo lesions treated with stents versus IH regrowth in patients with treated in-stent restenosis. Intravascular ultrasound was performed after intervention and at the 6-month follow-up visit as part of a standardized protocol across several clinical trials. At 6 months, the lumen was larger in the de novo group (mean lumen cross-sectional area [CSA] 6.31 +/- 2.2 vs 4.48 +/- 1.9 mm(2), p = 0.0001; minimum lumen CSA 4.2 +/- 1.8 vs 2.59 +/- 1.5 mm(2), p = 0.0001). However, the total increase in the mean IH CSA volume was the similar in the de novo and ISR groups (2.89 +/- 1.6 vs 2.64 +/- 1.94 mm(2), respectively; p = 0.11). We found that IH regrowth in restented in-stent restenosis lesions was similar to that in de novo stent implantation and that the final lumen CSA was an important component of in-stent restenosis recurrence.     

Comparison of the self-expanding Radius stent and the balloon-expandable Multilink stent for elective treatment of coronary stenoses: a serial analysis by intravascular ultrasound.

We compared the outcome of the self-expanding Radius stent and the balloon-expandable Multilink stent serially by angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Successful stent deployment was achieved in 66 lesions of 56 stable angina patients (34 lesions with Radius stents and 32 lesions with Multilink stents). At follow-up, there were no significant differences in minimal lumen diameter or percent diameter stenosis between the groups, nor in restenosis rates, although the Radius stent group rate was slightly lower (23.5% vs. 31.3%). In the Radius stent group, stent cross-sectional area (CSA) increased gradually after implantation until the 6-month follow-up (8.37 +/- 1.83 to 10.16 +/- 2.59 mm(2); n = 15), giving a larger CSA (P = 0.03) than the Multilink stent group, which decreased (9.00 +/- 2.05 to 8.27 +/- 2.15 mm(2); n = 17). The lumen CSA was also slightly larger (6.82 +/- 3.06 vs. 5.84 +/- 1.85 mm(2); P = 0.29) in the Radius stent group. These findings indicated that the Radius stent enlarged progressively after implantation, which might be useful for prevention of restenosis.     

Relation of final lumen dimensions in saphenous vein grafts after stent implantation to outcome

Larger final lumen dimensions after percutaneous coronary interventions in native coronary arteries lead to lower restenosis rates. We sought to determine the impact of stent expansion, as assessed by intravascular ultrasound, on clinical results of stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts (SVGs). We identified 226 consecutive patients who underwent intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting of 234 de novo SVG lesions. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the final stent cross-sectional area (CSA): group I (stent CSA <100% of the reference lumen CSA, n = 176 patients, 182 lesions) and group II (stent CSA >/=100% of the reference lumen CSA, n = 50 patients, 52 lesions). Baseline patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups with the exception of smaller lesions in group II. More aggressive stent expansion (group II) was associated with (1) increased rates of in-hospital non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (29% vs 17%, p = 0.05), (2) any myocardial infarction (26% vs 8%, p = 0.003) at 1-year follow-up, and (3) no improvement in target vessel revascularization at 1 year (31% vs 26%, p = 0.3). Aggressive stent expansion in SVG lesions resulted in higher myocardial infarction rates and, unlike native arteries, no improvement in target vessel revascularization rate at 1 year. A less aggressive stent implantation strategy in SVGs than in native coronary lesions appears prudent.     

Elevated preprocedural high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels are associated with neointimal hyperplasia and restenosis development after successful coronary artery stenting.

BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate that an elevated serum level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) predicts the risk of recurrent coronary events, and that statin therapy decreases the risk of coronary events. This study assessed the relationship between the pre-procedural hs-CRP level and in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) after stenting and the effects of statins on the relationship between restenosis after stenting and the serum hs-CRP levels of patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 100 patients who underwent stent implantation for angiographically significant stenosis. Patients were divided into a normal C-reactive protein (CRP) group (<0.5 mg/dl, n=59) and elevated CRP group (>or=0.5 mg/dl, n=41). All patients underwent angiographic and intravascular ultrasound follow-up at 6 months. The baseline CRP level was 0.29+/-0.08 mg/dl in the normal CRP group and 2.90+/-2.31 mg/dl in the elevated CRP group. The NIH cross-sectional area (CSA) in the minimal lumen CSA at follow-up was significantly larger in the elevated CRP group compared with the normal CRP group (1.9+/-1.3 mm2 vs 3.0+/-1.5 mm2, p=0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between pre-interventional CRP level and NIH area (r=0.52, p<0.001). In patients with normal CRP, an association between statin therapy and restenosis was not observed. However, when the analysis was confined to patients with elevated CRP, statin therapy significantly reduced the restenosis rate (20% vs 37.5%, p=0.031). In the normal CRP group, the intra-stent neointimal area at 6 months was not different between the non-statin and statin groups (2.2+/-1.4 mm2 vs 1.8+/-1.1 mm2). However, in the elevated CRP group, statin therapy significantly decreased the neointimal area at 6-month follow-up (3.6+/-1.7 mm2 vs 2.4+/-1.3 mm2, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Measuring the pre-interventional hs-CRP level may help predict the development of restenosis after stenting and statin therapy will significantly reduce the restenosis rate in patients with an elevated hs-CRP.     

Effect of amlodipine on vascular responses after coronary stenting compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of restenosis after coronary stenting is clinically important. We compared amlodipine and quinapril to determine which is more effective in preventing restenosis after stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Immediately after successful coronary stenting of 101 lesions in 63 consecutive patients, the patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 32 patients with 48 lesions were administered amlodipine 5 mg/day (group A), and 31 patients with 53 lesions were administered quinapril 10 mg/day (group Q). Lesions were assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) before and immediately after stenting and in the follow-up phase. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) could only be performed on 20 lesions in group A and 16 lesions in group Q throughout the follow-up period. We analyzed each lesion at 5 sites. In the follow-up phase, the minimal lumen diameter in group A was significantly larger than that in group Q (1.88 +/- 0.64 mm vs 1.52 +/- 0.53 mm, p<0.01). In the follow-up phase, the neointimal area (stent area-lumen area) in group A was significantly smaller than that in group Q (1.9 +/- 0.5 mm2 vs 2.7 +/- 0.8 mm2 at the middle portion of stent, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: These QCA and IVUS findings suggest that amlodipine has beneficial effects in inhibiting neointimal hyperplasia in stented lesions compared with quinapril.     

Randomized comparison of coronary stenting with optimal balloon angioplasty for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries.

AIMS: Angioplasty of lesions in small coronary arteries remains a significant problem because of the increased risk of restenosis. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of elective coronary stent placement and optimal balloon angioplasty in small vessel disease. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients with lesions in small coronary arteries (de novo, non-ostial lesion and reference diameter <3 mm) were randomly assigned to either balloon angioplasty or elective stent placement (7-cell NIR stent). The primary end-point was restenosis at 6 months follow-up. Optimal balloon angioplasty was defined as diameter stenosis less than or = 30% and the absence of major dissection after the angioplasty, and crossover to stenting was allowed. RESULTS: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the two groups. Procedure was successful in all patients, and in-hospital events did not occur in any patient. However, 12 patients in the angioplasty group were stented because of suboptimal results or major dissection. Postprocedural lumen diameter was significantly larger in the stent group than in the angioplasty group (2.44 +/- 0.36 mm vs 2.14 +/- 0.36, P<0.05, respectively), but late loss was greater in the stent group (1.12 +/- 0.67 mm vs 0.63 +/- 0.48, P<0.01, respectively). The angiographic restenosis rate was 30.9% in the angioplasty group, and 35.7% in the stent group (P = ns). Clinical follow-up was available in all patients (15.9 +/- 5.7 months) and clinical events during the follow-up were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that optimal balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting may be a reasonable approach for treatment of lesions in small coronary arteries.     

Coronary stenting or balloon angioplasty for chronic total coronary occlusions: the Taiwan experience (a single-center report)

The authors conducted this study to compare the restenosis and reocclusion rates of primary balloon angioplasty alone versus angioplasty followed by stenting in Taiwanese patients with chronic total occlusions. They also evaluated whether stenting reduced the incidence of restenosis and improved left ventricular function in these patients. From October 1998 to April 2000, a total of 294 patients with chronic total occlusion (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction grade 0 flow) underwent recanalization using balloon angioplasty alone or followed by stent implantation. Of these, only 129 patients were included after procedural failure and patients lost to follow-up; 62 patients were placed in the stent group, while 67 patients were assigned to the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group. Coronary angiography was performed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up or earlier if angina or objective evidence of ischemia involving the target vessel or other vessels was present. Procedural success was 60%. Minimal lumen diameter increased significantly after stenting: 2.97 +/-0.41 vs 2.24 +/-0.41 (p < 0.001); 60% of patients in the stent group were free of restenosis, whereas only 33% in the PTCA group were free of restenosis at follow-up. Only 1 patient in the stent group had reocclusion, as opposed to 17 (25%) patients in the PTCA group (p < 0.001). The follow-up minimal lumen diameter (MLD) at 6 months was significantly larger in the stent group: 1.80 +/-0.85 mm vs 1.08 +/-0.82 mm (p < 0.001). Left ventricular function improved in the stent group, but not in the PTCA group (58.44 +/-16.58% to 63.60 +/-14.59% [p < 0.001] vs 54.13 +/-15.66% to 54.31 +/-15.60% [p = 0.885]). More patients had angina in the PTCA group than in the stented group 43 vs 29 (p = 0.053). The postprocedural MLD and reference vessel diameter (RVD) were the strong predictors of restenosis and follow-up MLD (p < 0.001). Stenting of chronically occluded arteries significantly reduced the incidence of reocclusion and restenosis, at the same time improving left ventricular function in these patients. This should be the procedure of choice after successful angioplasty of chronically occluded vessels.     

Effect of statin therapy on restenosis after coronary stent implantation

The effect of statins on the development of restenosis and clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation was assessed in a retrospective analysis of 525 consecutive patients. Baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics did not differ between 258 patients with and 267 patients without statin therapy. Statin therapy was associated with a significantly (p<0.04) improved survival free of myocardial infarction and a significant reduction in repeat target vessel revascularization procedures (27.9% vs. 36.7%, p<0.05) during 6-month follow-up. Minimal lumen diameter was significantly larger (1.98+/-0.88 vs. 1.78+/-0.88 mm, p = 0.01), late lumen loss was significantly less (0.64+/-0.8 vs. 0.8+/-0.8 mm, p = 0.032), and net gain significantly increased (1.2+/-0.88 vs. 0.98+/- 0.92 mm, p = 0. 009) in patients receiving statin therapy. Dichotomous angiographic restenosis (> or =50%) rates were significantly lower, with 25.4% in the statin group compared with 38% in the no-statin group (p<0.005). Multivariate analysis identified statin therapy (p = 0.005), minimal lumen diameter immediately after stenting (p = 0.02), and stent length (p = 0.02) as independent predictors for subsequent restenosis development. Thus, statin therapy is associated with reduced recurrence rates and improved clinical outcome after coronary stent implantation.     

Angiographic results of the first human experience with everolimus-eluting stents for the treatment of coronary lesions (the FUTURE I trial)

The purpose of this study was to report the angiographic findings of the first human evaluation of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES) for the treatment of noncomplex coronary lesions. Forty-two patients with de novo coronary lesions (2.75 to 4.00 mm vessels; lesion length, <18 mm) were prospectively randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the EES (n = 27) or a metallic stent (n = 15). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar among both groups. At 6-month follow-up, EES had a lower in-stent late lumen loss (0.10 +/- 0.22 vs 0.85 +/- 0.32 mm, p <0.0001) and in-segment diameter stenoses (20.7 +/- 12.3% vs 37.0 +/- 15.8%, p = 0.002). There was no in-stent restenosis with EES; however, 1 focal distal edge restenosis was present. There was 1 in-stent and 1 in-segment (proximal edge) restenosis in the metallic stent group. There was no stent thrombosis or aneurysm formation at follow-up in either group.     

Angiographic results of the first human experience with the Biolimus A9 drug-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions

This report describes angiographic findings of the first-in-human evaluation of the Biolimus A9 drug-eluting stent (Biolimus stent) in the treatment of noncomplex coronary lesions. In total, 120 patients with 122 de novo coronary lesions (2.75- to 4.00-mm vessels, < or = 24-mm lesion length) were prospectively randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive the Biolimus stent (n = 80, 82 lesions) or the control uncoated stent (n = 40). Baseline lesion and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 6-month follow-up, late lumen loss was significantly decreased with the Biolimus stent in the stent (0.26 +/- 0.43 vs 0.74 +/- 0.45 mm, p < 0.001) and in the segment (0.14 +/- 0.45 vs 0.40 +/- 0.41 mm, p = 0.004). In-stent restenosis was 3.9% in the Biolimus stent group versus 7.7% in the control group (p = 0.40). There was no exaggerated hyperplasia at the proximal and/or distal edge of the stent.     

Long-term outcome of simultaneous kissing stenting technique with sirolimus-eluting stent for large bifurcation coronary lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the outcomes of simultaneous kissing stenting with sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). BACKGROUND: Percutaneous intervention for bifurcation coronary lesions is still challenging. METHODS: This study was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 36 consecutive patients with large bifurcation coronary lesions who underwent simultaneous kissing stenting with SES. RESULTS: Lesion location was unprotected left main in 29 patients (81%) and anterior descending artery in 7 (19%). The patients received a combination of aspirin and clopidogrel for 6 months and cilostazol for 1 month. Mean proximal reference diameter was 4.05 +/- 0.68 mm. Compared with the side branch (SB), the main vessel (MV) involved longer lesions (25.8 +/- 17.0 mm vs. 10.2 +/- 10.8 mm, P < 0.001) and smaller preprocedural minimal lumen diameters (1.02 +/- 0.53 mm vs. 1.46 +/- 0.78 mm, P = 0.006) and was treated with larger stents (3.1 +/- 0.3 mm vs. 3.0 +/- 0.3 mm, P = 0.006). Angiographic success rate was 100%. Over the follow-up of 26.7 +/- 8.6 months, no deaths, myocardial infarctions or stent thromboses occurred. Target lesion revascularization was performed in five patients (14%). Overall angiographic restenosis occurred in 5/30 patients (17%), consisting of 4 (13%) at MV and 3 (10%) at SB. At follow-up angiography, a membranous diaphragm at the carina was identified in 14 patients (47%), but only one of whom was associated with angiographic restenosis. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous kissing stenting with SES appears a feasible stenting technique in large bifurcation coronary lesions. However, a new angiographic structure of carinal membrane developed in a half of patients at follow-up and its influence needs to be further investigated.     

Thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in type 2 diabetic patients: an intravascular ultrasound study

OBJECTIVES: Thiazolidinedione treatment reduces neointimal tissue proliferation after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. However, in-stent restenosis still persists in patients treated with thiazolidinedione. The effect of thiazolidinedione treatment on the pattern of in-stent restenosis remains unclear. This study investigated whether thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse neointimal hyperplasia in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation in diabetic patients. METHODS: Volumetric intravascular ultrasound was performed at 6 months after coronary stent implantation in 76 patients with restenotic lesions who received either conventional anti-diabetic treatment (control group, n = 56) or thiazolidinedione treatment (thiazolidinedione group, n = 20). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups in stent volume (99 +/- 32 vs 90 +/- 20 mm3, respectively, p = 0.26) or in minimal lumen area in the stent (1.4 +/- 0.6 vs 1.6 +/- 0.5 mm2, respectively, p = 0.11). However, there were significant reductions in neointimal volume (56 +/- 25 vs 36 +/- 11 mm3, respectively, p < 0.01)and neointimal index (56 +/- 11% vs 41 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.01) in the thiazolidinedione group. Coefficient of variation of neointimal tissue accumulation was greater in the thiazolidinedione group (45.5%) than in the control group (25.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Intravascular ultrasound study demonstrated that together with reduction of overall neointimal tissue proliferation, thiazolidinedione treatment caused greater point-to-point heterogeneity in the neointimal tissue accumulation in restenotic lesions after coronary stent implantation. This finding strongly suggests that thiazolidinedione treatment attenuates diffuse in-stent restenosis in diabetic patients.