Clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention (the PRIDE study).

This study describes the dose-exploration phase of the PRIDE trial, an investigation of the clinical pharmacology of higher dose eptifibatide in patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Outcomes of treatment with the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were dependent upon proper dosing selection. In this multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical study, 127 patients were randomized 1:1:2:2 into 1 of the following treatment groups: placebo; eptifibatide as a 135 microg/kg bolus followed by a 0.75 microg/kg/min infusion; eptifibatide as a 180 microg/kg bolus with a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion; or eptifibatide as a 250 microg/kg bolus with a 3.0 microg/kg/min infusion. Light transmission aggregometry was used to determine platelet aggregation in response to 20 microM adenosine diphosphate, and platelet receptor occupancy was also determined. Eptifibatide exhibited linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied. Inhibition of platelet aggregation was greater in samples collected in sodium citrate compared with those collected in D-phenylalanyl-L-prolyl-L-arginine chloromethyl ketone. The 180/2.0 dosing regimen achieved 90% inhibition of platelet aggregation immediately (5 minutes) and at steady state (8 to 24 hours). At 1 hour, mean inhibition of platelet aggregation was 80%. Eptifibatide exhibited dose-dependent pharmacodynamics that were dependent upon choice of anticoagulant. A 180 microg/kg bolus followed by a 2.0 microg/kg/min infusion at steady state achieved >80% inhibition of platelet aggregation. With the single-bolus regimen, however, there was an early loss of the inhibition of platelet aggregation before steady state was reached. Additional dose-exploration studies may further optimize eptifibatide dosing.     

Antiplatelet effects of abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We sought to investigate whether abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide achieve comparable antiplatelet effects with coronary stenting. BACKGROUND: The glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonists abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide differ in chemical structure, binding site and pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing coronary stenting were randomly assigned to abciximab (bolus 0.25 mg/kg body weight, infusion 10 microg per min for 12 h), tirofiban (bolus 10 microg/kg, infusion 0.15 microg/kg per min for 72 h) or eptifibatide (bolus 180 microg/kg, infusion 2 microg/kg per min for 72 h). We took serial blood samples to analyze platelet function by using flow cytometry, turbidimetric aggregometry and the rapid platelet-function assay (RPFA). RESULTS: As assessed by RPFA, platelet aggregation after 2 h of infusion was reduced to 5.9 +/- 7.8% (mean +/- SD) of baseline by abciximab, to 5.0 +/- 5.4% by tirofiban and to 7.8 +/- 7.1% by eptifibatide (p = 0.42). Turbidimetric aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate stimulation yielded similar results, whereas percent inhibition of platelet aggregation after thrombin receptor stimulation was 45.8 +/- 16.8% with abciximab, 51.3 +/- 17.6% with tirofiban and 52.9 +/- 14.8% with eptifibatide (p = 0.37). Tirofiban and eptifibatide maintained their level of platelet inhibition during infusion. Flow cytometry revealed that the reduction in the monocyte-platelet interaction by abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide was not significantly different (20.0 +/- 21.9%, 23.8 +/- 18.2% and 21.0 +/- 19.8%, respectively; p = 0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Abciximab, tirofiban and eptifibatide, at currently recommended doses, achieved similar levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation and a similar reduction in the platelet-monocyte interaction.     

Variability in extent of platelet function inhibition after administration of optimal dose of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers in patients undergoing a high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention

The Ultegra Rapid Platelet Function Assay was used to measure the inhibition of platelet aggregation at baseline and 10 minutes and 8 hours after starting therapy in 114 patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention with the planned use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor. The abciximab-treated patients received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.125 microg/kg/min infusion for 12 hours; the eptifibatide-treated patients received 2 boluses of 180 microg/kg administered 10 minutes apart, followed by a 2 microg/kg/min infusion for 24 hours; the tirofiban-treated patients received a 25 microg/kg bolus, followed by a 0.15 microg/kg/min infusion for 18 hours. Ten minutes after starting therapy, the mean level of platelet inhibition was 86 +/- 9% for abciximab, 92 +/- 6% for eptifibatide, and 95 +/- 5% for tirofiban (p <0.001); > or =95% platelet inhibition was achieved in 29% of the patients treated with abciximab, 44% of those receiving eptifibatide, and 68% of the those receiving tirofiban (p = 0.02). In conclusion, at the evaluated doses, tirofiban seemed to be the most effective drug in achieving "optimal" platelet inhibition very early after percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Pharmacodynamic profile of short-term readministration of abciximab in healthy subjects

Objective The purpose of the study was to establish a rebolus regimen for abciximab that restores pharmacologic glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor blockade within a short time frame (up to 48 hours) after completion of an initial treatment. Methods and Results The study was a single-center, nonrandomized, open-label dose escalation trial in healthy volunteers (n = 30). Each subject received a 0.25 mg/kg bolus and a 0.125 μg/kg per minute infusion of abciximab, followed by incremental bolus doses of the agent at 15-minute intervals up to 48 hours (10 per group) after completion of the infusion, (maximal cumulative rebolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg). Pharmacodynamic measurements (GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade, turbidimetric and whole blood platelet aggregation with use of a rapid platelet function assay [RPFA]) were obtained at periodic intervals during and after administration of the abciximab bolus and infusion. At the time of the first rebolus, pharmacodynamic measurements were attained immediately before administration of each rebolus and 15 minutes after the last rebolus dose. In subjects who received reboluses 12 hours after infusion, a cumulative dose of 0.05 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of GP IIb/IIIa receptors and >80% inhibition of turbidimetric (5 and 20 μmol/L adenosine diphosphate) and RPFA aggregation in 10 of 10 subjects. At 24 hours after treatment, a cumulative abciximab bolus dose of 0.1 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of all 4 pharmacodynamic measurements in 10 of 10 subjects. At 48 hours after treatment, a cumulative bolus dose of 0.15 mg/kg restored >80% blockade of all 4 pharmacodynamic measurements in 10 of 10 subjects. Conclusions A fraction of the bolus of abciximab restored pharmacologic (>80%) GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade when readministered at various postinfusion time points. These observations suggest that in the setting where acute readministration of abciximab is required less than a full bolus dose of the agent is warranted. (Am Heart J 2002;143:87-94.)     

Long-term mortality benefit with abciximab in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to test: 1) if platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa) blockade with abciximab bolus plus 12-h infusion reduces mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); 2) if prevention of early myocardial infarction (MI) after PCI is a mechanism for reducing mortality; and 3) for risk factors for mortality after PCI.

BACKGROUND

Studies of PCI suggest that MI after intervention is predictive of mortality. Abciximab, a platelet GP IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, has consistently reduced the incidence of MI among PCI patients in several trials. The presumed mechanism is prevention of platelet thrombus associated with vessel wall injury and downstream embolization into the microcirculation.

METHODS

In eight trials, 5,154 patients were randomized to a regimen comprising conventional therapy plus a bolus of abciximab within 1 h before PCI followed by a 12-h infusion; 4,136 controls were randomized to conventional therapy alone. Patient follow-up from six months to three years was available. Survival differences are examined using proportional hazards regression and survival curves.

RESULTS

A hazard ratio of 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.89; P = 0.003) suggests a mortality benefit with abciximab. The absolute reduction in mortality was estimated to be 0.5% through 30 days, 0.7% through six months, 0.9% through one year and 1.8% through three years. Early MI explained 18% of the observed mortality benefit at one year. Multivariate regression suggests that patients with advanced cardiovascular disease may derive the greatest mortality benefit from abciximab.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from 9,290 randomized PCI patients shows a mortality benefit provided by abciximab bolus plus 12-h infusion.     

Therapeutic heparin concentrations augment platelet reactivity: implications for the pharmacologic assessment of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist abciximab

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effect of heparin on the platelet reactivity and the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ex vivo studies were performed on patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 26) who were at moderate to high risk of ischemic complications. Patients received a 12,000-U bolus of heparin followed by a 0.25-mg/kg bolus of abciximab. Before abciximab treatment, platelet aggregation responses to a variety of stimuli were assessed immediately before and 10 minutes after the heparin bolus. Heparin increased platelet aggregation to 2 and 5 micromol/L adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and 5 microg/mL collagen by 36%, 25%, and 46%, respectively (P < or =.001), but did not influence platelet reactivity to thrombin receptor-activating peptide or 20 micromol/L ADP and had no appreciable effect on platelet surface glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa receptor numbers. To assess the impact of heparin on the pharmacodynamic profile of abciximab, GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and platelet aggregation inhibition estimates obtained after abciximab administration were calculated relative to the basal levels observed both before and after the heparin bolus. At 2 and 24 hours after the abciximab bolus, GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade measurements normalized to either the preheparin or postheparin baseline determinations were equivalent. For all ADP concentrations tested, the 2-hour post-abciximab bolus platelet aggregation inhibition estimates based on the preheparin and postheparin baseline values were comparable. However, for 2 and 5 micromol/L ADP, the 24-hour post-abciximab platelet aggregation inhibition measurements based on preheparin baseline values were significantly lower than postheparin baseline determinations (both P < or =.003). In vitro studies revealed that therapeutic heparin doses induced a concentration-dependent reduction in the extent of platelet inhibition produced by amounts of abciximab that elicit partial inhibition of platelet aggregation. However, at abciximab concentrations that achieved platelet aggregation blockade of >80%, the levels of inhibition of platelet aggregation in the presence and absence of heparin were equivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The cumulative ex vivo and in vitro data indicate that for certain stimuli, heparin alters the platelet inhibitory profile of abciximab at concentrations of the agent that yield partial suppression of platelet function.     

Pharmacodynamics,safety, and clinical effects of a novel glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist framon during high risk coronary angioplasty

Preparation framon [F(ab')2 fragments of the anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa monoclonal antibody (FRaMon)] blocks fibrinogen binding to GP IIb/IIIa and platelet aggregation. Dynamics of platelet aggregation inhibition, safety, and clinical effects of framon were studied in high-risk coronary angioplasty. Twenty seven patients underwent angioplasty with framon, 29 - with abciximab and 28 - with no GP IIb/IIIa antagonists. Framon at 0.2 mg/kg (n=16) and 0.25 mg/kg (n=11) bolus administration inhibited platelet aggregation induced by 20 mcM ADP by more than 90%, 80%, 60% and 30% in comparison with the predrug level 1, 12, 24 and 72 h after injection, respectively. Almost the same dynamics of aggregation inhibition was observed upon abciximab administration at 0.25 mg/kg bolus + 0.125 mcg/kg/min infusion for 12 h. No signs of individual intolerance and side effects including allergic reactions and bleedings were detected in patients treated with framon. Slight decrease of platelet count (15-20%) was observed on the first day after framon administration. Antibodies against framon were detected in 1 out of 22 tested patients. Free (nonbound to platelets) framon was completely removed from the circulation 12 h after injection. The number of endpoints (death, myocardial infarction and indications for repeat revascularization) within 1 year after angioplasty was approximately the same in the groups with framon and abciximab - 7 of 25 (28%) and 7 of 28 (25%), respectively, and more than 1.5 fold higher in the group without GP IIb/IIIa blockers - 12 of 27 (44,4%).     

Achieved platelet aggregation inhibition after different antiplatelet regimens during percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the extent of platelet aggregation inhibition in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), treated with different antiplatelet agents and dosages. BACKGROUND: The extent of platelet aggregation inhibition is an independent predictor of major cardiac events after elective PCI. In STEMI patients undergoing PCI, routine dose of antiplatelet agents may be associated with less effective platelet aggregation inhibition. METHODS: Patients were treated with clopidogrel before angiography and randomized to abciximab, tirofiban, high-dose tirofiban, or no glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitor; GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor bolus, followed by maintenance infusion, was administered after angiography, but before PCI. Platelet aggregation inhibition was assessed before angiography, immediately after PCI, and 1 and 6 h afterwards. RESULTS: The total study population consisted of 112 patients. Platelet aggregation inhibition was variable for individuals and suboptimal for all agents, particularly in the periprocedural period. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. Angiographic parameters after PCI were not different between the groups. No relationship was found between the level of platelet aggregation and parameters of PCI success (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction frame count and myocardial blush grade), after combining the data from all four groups studied. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet aggregation inhibition in STEMI patients undergoing PCI, treated with antiplatelet agents, is variable and suboptimal for all agents and dosages studied. Only with high-dose tirofiban, mean periprocedural platelet aggregation inhibition exceeded 80%. However, no relationship of platelet aggregation inhibition and angiographic outcome was found in this patient cohort.     

Design and methodology of the ESPRIT trial: evaluating a novel dosing regimen of eptifibatide in percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials of the glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors have shown that these potent antiplatelet agents are effective in reducing the ischemic complications of percutaneous coronary interventions. However, even though stents are now implanted in >75% of percutaneous interventional procedures, only one study, a trial of the monoclonal antibody abciximab, has formally evaluated adjunctive GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eptifibatide, a nonimmunogenic and rapidly reversible inhibitor of the platelet receptor integrin IIb/IIIa, has also undergone evaluation as an adjunct to coronary intervention. In clinical trials performed heretofore, however, it has appeared to have less relative clinical efficacy than the monoclonal antibody abciximab. Since the early seminal trials, it has been recognized that the doses of eptifibatide previously used achieved only 30% to 50% of maximal platelet GP IIb/IIIa integrin inhibition. This is considerably less than the 80% level of receptor inhibition that has been proposed to prevent coronary thrombus formation in animal models and that has been achieved in clinical trials with abciximab. CONCLUSIONS: The Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial was designed to test the safety and efficacy of a high-dose, "180/2.0/180" double-bolus regimen of eptifibatide (a 180-microg/kg bolus followed 10 minutes later by a second 180-microg/kg bolus of eptifibatide combined with a 2.0-microg/kg per minute infusion) as an adjunct to nonacute percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation. In this report, we review the rationale, design, and methods of this clinical investigation.     

Platelet inhibition with tirofiban early during percutaneous coronary intervention: dosing revisited.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of the intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Differences in the degree of platelet inhibition achieved with these agents may account for the disparity in clinical efficacy noted in recently completed clinical trials. The purpose of this study was to evaluate ex vivo platelet inhibition with tirofiban in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and who were referred for percutaneous coronary interventions. Twenty-five patients were studied. Ten patients received tirofiban 10 microg/kg bolus and 0.15 microg/kg infusion for 16 hr. Platelet inhibition was determined at 5, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 120 min after tirofiban, by light transmission aggregometry (LTA), rapid platelet function assay (RPFA), and platelet works (PW). The average platelet inhibition using RPFA with PPACK, was 87% at 5 min, then decreased to a nadir of 72% at 30 min and recovered back to > 80% at 60 min and onward. Similar trends were noted with RPFA-citrate, PW, and LTA. Ca-chelating anticoagulants (EDTA and citrate) overestimated platelet inhibition at all time points. Dose adjustment was done by increasing the bolus (15 microg/kg) in five patients, increasing the maintenance dose (0.2 microg/kg/min) in five patients, and increasing both the bolus and the maintenance dose in another five patients. Platelet inhibition tested by all the above methods was consistently over 90% when both the bolus and maintenance doses were increased. No increased incidence of major bleeding was noted at this adjusted dose. The current dosing of tirofiban may be inadequate to achieve appropriate platelet inhibition during PCI in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome and receiving tirofiban immediately before the procedure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Dose adjustment may be needed to maximize platelet inhibition early during PCI.     

A comparative study of light transmission aggregometry and automated bedside platelet function assays in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and receiving abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban.

Platelet inhibition is central to the efficacy of glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa antagonist therapy, but is not routinely measured during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data directly comparing the antiplatelet effects of these agents are also limited. Therefore, we compared ex vivo platelet function by standard light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and two automated bedside platelet function assays in 36 patients undergoing PCI with GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors. At baseline and 10 min following clinically recommended bolus and infusion of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg, 0.125 microg/kg/min), eptifibatide (180 microg/kg, 2 microg/kg/min), or tirofiban (10 microg/kg, 0.1 microg/kg/min), we measured 20 microM ADP- and 1.9 mg/mL collagen-induced platelet aggregation using LTA. Platelet function was also assessed using the bedside Accumetrics Ultegra-Rapid Platelet Function Assay (RPFA) and the Xylum Clot Signature Analyzer (CSA). The degree of platelet inhibition, as assessed by LTA, varied significantly between the clinically recommended doses of these GP IIb-IIIa antagonists. RPFA measurements agreed closely with LTA for abciximab, but tended to overestimate the degree of platelet inhibition for small molecules. CSA demonstrated profoundly inhibited shear-induced platelet function, but lacked sensitivity to discriminate between agents. These findings may have implications for the results of trials comparing the efficacy of these agents in patients undergoing PCI.     

Time course, magnitude, and consistency of platelet inhibition by abciximab, tirofiban, or eptifibatide in patients with unstable angina pectoris undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Adjunctive platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces platelet-mediated adverse ischemic outcomes. Although abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban have received U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval for use, these agents differ in their pharmacodynamic profiles. Each of these agents has been compared in randomized trials with placebo for patients undergoing PCI, but no randomized comparative studies of these agents have been performed. We compared ex vivo platelet function by both standard light transmission aggregometry and rapid platelet function assay during and after administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban in approved dose regimens on a randomized basis at the time of PCI in patients with unstable angina pectoris. A reduced intensity of platelet inhibition by light transmission aggregometry was observed for tirofiban compared with either eptifibatide or abciximab. In addition, the 30-minute bolus strategy used for tirofiban was associated with delayed onset of maximal platelet inhibition relative to the initiation of bolus infusion. Whether the trends in platelet function observed in this study will be translated into differences in clinical outcomes awaits definition by larger scale randomized clinical trials comparing these platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.     

Determination of platelet aggregation inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention with the platelet function analyzer PFA-100

Background A simple device to rapidly evaluate platelet function may aid in optimizing glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively studied platelet function in 250 patients receiving abciximab or eptifibatide during PCI. Methods and Results The platelet function analyzer PFA-100 (Dade-Behring, Deerfield, Ill) measures platelet function by determining the time to occlusion of an aperture in a biochemically active membrane as whole blood flows under high shear conditions. Platelet aggregation causes aperture occlusion, and results are reported as a closure time (CT). All patients received either abciximab or eptifibatide, along with aspirin and heparin; patients undergoing stent implantation received aspirin and a thienopyridine postprocedure. The CT was measured at baseline and 10 minutes, 4 hours, 12 hours (abciximab-only), and 24 hours after the bolus. Profound inhibition was exhibited in most patients shortly after the platelet inhibitor bolus and during the course of therapy. We observed recovery of platelet function 12 hours after discontinuation of abciximab, with a high degree of interpatient variability, and ongoing profound platelet inhibition 4 to 6 hours after the discontinuation of eptifibatide. Among patients treated with abciximab, patients who were obese recovered from platelet inhibition sooner than patients who were not obese, whereas patients who were elderly had delayed recovery compared with patients who were not elderly. Failure to achieve maximal platelet inhibition (nonclosure) at 10 minutes indicated a possible association with adverse clinical events at the 6-month follow-up examination (60% vs 20%). Conclusions PFA-100 is a rapid simple assay used as a means of assessing inhibition of platelet aggregation during PCI performed with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Failure to achieve nonclosure early after the initiation of abciximab therapy warrants further investigation because there may be an association with adverse cardiac events at 6-month follow-up. (Am Heart J 2002;144:151-8.)     

Point-of-care testing shows clinically relevant variation in the degree of inhibition of platelets by standard-dose abciximab therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Administration of GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has proven clinical benefit, but is administered at a dose allowing for the patients' weight but not other variables. This study of 75 patients evaluated platelet inhibition achieved by standard-dose abciximab therapy during PCI as measured by two point-of-care (POC) instruments, Plateletworks (PW) and whole blood aggregation (WB). Results were related to the decrease of platelet activation produced as well as patients' return of angina within 30 days. Flow cytometric measurement showed abciximab suppressed platelet-monocyte aggregates (P < 0.001) and activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (P < 0.001) but not P-selectin. Greater POC-measured inhibition corresponded to less postabciximab expression of platelet-monocyte aggregates (P < 0.01). Patients above the lowest quartile of POC inhibition with PW demonstrated a relative risk of experiencing return of angina within 30 days of 0.48 (0.23-0.99). In conclusion, POC measurements reflect platelet activation suppression, higher PW measurements being associated with a decreased risk of return of angina.     

Abciximab, ticlopidine, and concomitant abciximab-ticlopidine therapy: ex vivo platelet aggregation inhibition profiles in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

BACKGROUND: We examined the ex vivo platelet aggregation profiles of patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and received either abciximab, ticlopidine, or both agents. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The trial was a prospective, nonrandomized, single-center, open-label study of 42 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who received the following regimens: group 1, abciximab (0.25 mg/kg bolus and 12-hour, 0.125 microg/kg per minute infusion); group 2, ticlopidine (250 mg twice daily for 14 consecutive days, initiated 12 to 18 hours before intervention); group 3, abciximab plus ticlopidine initiated 12 to 18 hours before procedure; and group 4, abciximab plus ticlopidine initiated 72 to 96 hours before procedure. Platelet aggregation measurements to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and a thrombin receptor activating peptide (TRAP, 8 micromol/L) were obtained before ticlopidine treatment, after initiation of ticlopidine, and immediately before abciximab treatment and intervention, then at several time periods after onset of abciximab treatment. Platelet surface abciximab levels were monitored by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Neither ticlopidine regimen resulted in appreciable platelet inhibition before intervention and before administration of abciximab. In the ticlopidine-only arm, suppression of platelet aggregation to the weakest stimuli (5 micromol/L ADP; 23% +/- 7.5%) was detected within 24 hours after intervention, with maximal inhibition to both 5 and 20 micromol/L ADP observed 7 days after intervention (48% +/- 7.9% and 18% +/- 8.7%, respectively). In contrast, ticlopidine marginally suppressed TRAP-mediated platelet activation at times when maximal effects on ADP-mediated platelet aggregation were evident. Neither ticlopidine regimen appreciably enhanced platelet inhibition during or shortly after cessation of abciximab treatment. For all 3 abciximab treatment arms, profound inhibition of ADP-induced (>80%) and TRAP-induced (>65%) platelet aggregation was observed 2 hours after treatment. In the abciximab-only arm, platelet aggregation responses gradually recovered, with the rate of response directly proportional to the strength of stimuli. However, in the ticlopidine plus abciximab arms, recovery of platelet aggregation at later times (7 and 14 days) reached a plateau and reflected the extent of inhibition observed in ticlopidine-treated patients. No difference in the clearance of surface-bound abciximab from circulating platelets was observed between the abciximab and abciximab plus ticlopidine arms. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant abciximab plus ticlopidine treatment yields a platelet inhibition profile that is a composite of the effects of the 2 agents. In the early stages of treatment, inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation was mediated primarily by abciximab; effects were more moderate and were predominately mediated by ticlopidine.     

Use of ICHOR-platelet works to assess platelet function in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

Platelet glycoprotein GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors have been recently approved for use in treating patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing PCI. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using a new device, the ICHOR platelet works, to detect platelet inhibition in patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab or tirofiban. The study was conducted at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Thirty patients undergoing PCI and treated with abciximab (n = 10) or tirofiban (n = 20) are included. Blood samples were obtained before, at 30 min, at 4 hr, and at 12 hr after starting the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and 2 hr after discontinuation. Baseline studies revealed > 95% platelet aggregability in all patients after exposure to ADP (20 microM). After starting tirofiban, 82%, 83%, and 82% of platelets were inhibited at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr. Platelet inhibition decreased to 43% 2 hr after discontinuation of tirofiban. Similarly, ICHOR platelet works detected 91%, 92%, and 85% platelet inhibition at 30 min, 4 hr, and 12 hr after starting abciximab, respectively. Platelet inhibition decreased to 73% 2 hr after discontinuation. The ICHOR platelet works is a promising, simple, and rapid bedside method that may have clinical utility in assessing platelet inhibition in patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;53:346-351.     

Optimal duration of eptifibatide infusion in percutaneous coronary intervention (an ESPRIT substudy)

Although randomized trials have clearly demonstrated the clinical efficacy with regimens of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists that result in >80% inhibition of baseline platelet aggregation in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), there are no data available concerning the optimal duration of infusion of these agents. In an era when the length of hospitalization has a major impact on health care costs, the determination of the optimal duration of the infusion of these drugs after PCI is of great relevance. The investigators therefore sought to determine the optimal length of the infusion of eptifibatide after PCI by analyzing the outcomes of patients enrolled in the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor With Integrilin Therapy trial who were randomized to treatment with eptifibatide.     

Platelet-monocyte aggregates predict troponin rise after percutaneous coronary intervention and are inhibited by Abciximab

BACKGROUND: Platelet-monocyte aggregates and other markers of platelet activation were investigated before and after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with abciximab therapy. The study sought to assess the relationship between the level of platelet-monocyte aggregation and increases in cardiac troponin I post coronary intervention. METHODS: Blood samples were collected from 40 patients before PCI and 10 min after abciximab administration. These were tested for platelet activation markers by flow cytometry. Cardiac troponin I levels were assayed at baseline and at 24 h post PCI. RESULTS: Compared to healthy controls, patients with coronary artery disease had elevated markers of platelet activation including platelet-monocyte aggregates, P-selectin and PAC-1 (a marker specific for activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa) prior to PCI. Increased levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates before PCI were associated with increased expression of P-selectin on the platelet surface. Abciximab therapy reduced platelet-monocyte aggregate levels but had no effect on P-selectin expression. The high levels of expression of activated glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (PAC-1) on platelets prior to PCI was reduced with abciximab therapy. Patients with higher levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates prior to PCI were more likely to develop an elevation of cardiac troponin I during the 24 h after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Increased levels of platelet-monocyte aggregates may predict patients at risk for troponin elevation following PCI and identify those most likely to benefit from abciximab.     

Abciximab Pharmacodynamics Are Unaffected by Antecedent Therapy with Other GPIIb/IIIa Antagonists in Non-Human Primates

Background: Tirofiban and eptifibatide are currently approved for the medical stabilization of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. In patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during infusion of these drugs, conversion to abciximab, which has long term proven clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness, following PCI may be desirable. The purpose of this study was to determine if the binding or pharmacodynamics of abciximab is affected by a prior infusion of either tirofiban or eptifibatide. Methods: In vitro binding experiments were performed to determine if prior exposure to tirofiban or eptifibatide altered the affinity and extent of binding of abciximab to GPIIb/IIIa. For in vivo experiments, cynomolgus monkeys were pretreated with a bolus and 18 hour infusion of saline, tirofiban, or eptifibatide. At the end of the initial treatment, a bolus and 12 hr infusion of abciximab was started without delay. Inhibition of platelet aggregation, GPIIb/IIIa receptor blockade and abciximab pharmacokinetics were measured during and after both infusions. Results: Equilibrium binding of abciximab in vitro was unaffected by tirofiban or eptifibatide. The extent and duration of abciximab inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation, receptor blockade, and abciximab pharmacokinetics in monkeys during and after the abciximab infusion were not affected by prior infusion of the animals with tirofiban or eptifibatide. Conclusions: In vitro and in vivo studies revealed that the molecular interaction of abciximab with the platelet GPIIb/IIIa receptor is not altered by immediate prior exposure of platelets to small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists. These preclinical studies suggest that the efficacy of abciximab should not be impaired if it is initiated following termination of therapy with small molecule GPIIb/IIIa antagonists.     

Bivalirudin with planned or provisional abciximab versus low-dose heparin and abciximab during percutaneous coronary revascularization: results of the Comparison of Abciximab Complications with Hirulog for Ischemic Events Trial (CACHET)

Background The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin has previously been associated with better efficacy and lower hemorrhage risk than heparin during balloon angioplasty. This agent has not yet been tested with stenting or in combination with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. Methods and Results In a pilot trial, 268 patients who underwent coronary intervention were randomized in 3 sequential phases to treatment with bivalirudin (with or without abciximab) or the control regimen of low-dose weight-adjusted heparin with abciximab. Patients in the bivalirudin arms received bivalirudin (1.0 mg/kg bolus, infusion of 2.5 mg/kg/h for 4 hours) plus abciximab in phase A, bivalirudin (0.5 mg/kg bolus, infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h for the procedure duration) plus provisional (“rescue”) abciximab in phase B, or bivalirudin (0.75 mg/kg bolus, infusion of 1.75 mg/kg/h for the procedure duration) plus provisional abciximab in phase C. Abciximab was necessitated on a provisional basis in 24% of the patients in the bivalirudin arms of phases B and C. A composite clinical endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or major bleeding by 7 days occurred in 3.3%, 5.9%, 0, and 10.6% of the patients in the bivalirudin phase A, bivalirudin phase B, bivalirudin phase C, and heparin plus planned abciximab arms, respectively (P = .018 for the pooled bivalirudin groups versus the heparin group). Conclusion Bivalirudin with planned or provisional abciximab may be at least as safe and effective as low-dose heparin plus abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention. (Am Heart J 2002;143:847-53.)