Antimicrobial activity of doripenem (S-4661): a global surveillance report (2003)

The spectrum of activity and potency of doripenem, a broad-spectrum parenteral carbapenem currently in clinical development, was evaluated using 16 008 clinical bacterial isolates collected as part of an international surveillance project during 2003. Using reference broth microdilution methods, doripenem was found to be highly active against oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (2705 and 297 isolates, respectively; MIC90s 0.06 mg/L), with a potency greater than that of other carbapenem antibiotics. Against enterococci (1474 isolates), with the exception of Enterococcus faecium, doripenem displayed modest activity (MIC50 4). Doripenem was among the most potent agents tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae, viridans group streptococci and beta-haemolytic streptococci (885, 140 and 397 isolates; MIC(90)s 0.5, 0.5 and 0.03 mg/L, respectively). For Enterobacteriaceae (> 6200 isolates), doripenem was four- to 32-fold more active than imipenem against wild-type isolates (MIC90s 0.03-0.5 mg/L). MIC90s for confirmed extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (121 and 155 isolates; 0.06 and 0.12 mg/L, respectively) were two-fold higher than for wild-type isolates. Doripenem was also active against Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp. and Serratia spp. (MIC90s 0.06-0.25 mg/L), including ceftazidime-resistant isolates. Doripenem and meropenem were the most active agents among all beta-lactams against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (829 isolates; MIC50/90s 0.5/8 and 0.5/16 mg/L, respectively), whereas doripenem and imipenem were the most active agents against Acinetobacter spp. (155 isolates; MIC50/90s 0.5/4 and 相似文献   

In vitro antimicrobial activity of "last-resort" antibiotics against unusual nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli clinical isolates

In this prospective multicentric study, we assessed the in vitro antimicrobial activity of carbapenems (imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem), tigecycline, and colistin against 166 unusual nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (NF-GNB) clinical isolates collected from nine French hospitals during a 6-month period (from December 1, 2008, to May 31, 2009). All NF-GNB isolates were included, except those phenotypically identified as Pseudomonas aeruginosa or Acinetobacter baumannii. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antimicrobial agents were determined by using the E-test technique. The following microorganisms were identified: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n=72), Pseudomonas spp. (n=30), Achromobacter xylosoxidans (n=25), Acinetobacter spp. (n=18), Burkholderia cepacia complex (n=9), Alcaligenes faecalis (n=7), and Delftia spp. (n=5). All isolates of Acinetobacter spp., A. faecalis, and Delftia spp. were susceptible to the three carbapenems. Imipenem exhibited the lowest MICs against Pseudomonas spp., and meropenem, as compared with imipenem and doripenem, displayed an interesting antimicrobial activity against A. xylosoxidans and B. cepacia complex isolates. Conversely, no carbapenem exhibited any activity against S. maltophilia. Except for S. maltophilia isolates, tigecycline and colistin exhibited higher MICs than carbapenems, but covered most of the microorganisms tested in this study. To our knowledge, no prior study has compared antimicrobial activity of these five antibiotics, often considered as "last-resort" treatment options for resistant Gram-negative infections, against unusual NF-GNB clinical isolates. Further studies should be carried out to assess the potential clinical use of these antibiotics for the treatment of infections due to these microorganisms.     

In vitro activities of tigecycline, ertapenem, isepamicin, and other antimicrobial agents against clinically isolated organisms in Taiwan

This study evaluated the in vitro activities of tigecycline, ertapenem, isepamicin, and other comparators against 861 bacterial isolates recovered from patients treated in three major teaching hospitals in 2003. MICs to antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method. High rates of oxacillin resistance (58%) in Staphylococcus aureus (60 isolates), and vancomycin resistance (21%) and quinupristin-dalfopristin non-susceptibility (39%) in Enterococcus faecium (34 isolates) were found. Carbapenems had excellent in vitro activities (>or=98% susceptibility) against the 419 isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, with the MIC(50) and MIC(90) of imipenem, meropenem, and ertapenem being 0.25 and 4 mg/L, 0.03 and 0.12 mg/L, and 0.03 and 0.5 mg/L, respectively. For, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (74 isolates) and Burkholderia cepacia (21 isolates), meropenem (MIC(90), 0.25, 2, and 4 mg/L, respectively) had better in vitro activities than imipenem (MIC(90), 8, 4, and 32 mg/L, respectively) and ertapenem (MIC(90), 0.5, >32, and 32 mg/L, respectively). Isepamicin had a similar activity with amikacin against all Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, B. cepacia, and Acinetobacter baumannii, except for C. freundii isolates in which isepamicin had an eight-fold activity better than amikacin. Tigecycline had excellent in vitro activities against all isolates tested (MIC(90), 相似文献   

Doripenem vs meropenem against Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter

Recently, doripenem has been approved for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP), including ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The E-test was performed to determine the MICs of doripenem and meropenem in 203 endotracheal aspirate isolates that consisted of 140 Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-Acinetobacter baumannii complexes and 63 Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Doripenem showed minimum concentration necessary for inhibition of 50% (MIC 50 ) of P. aeruginosa isolates at 0.38 mg/L which is several times (84.2 times) lower than the corresponding MIC 50 value of >32 mg/L for meropenem. The MIC 50 and MIC 90 were similar for both the drugs against A. baumannii. Thus, P. aeruginosa was consistently more susceptible than the A. baumannii.     

Activity of doripenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

The in vitro activity of doripenem was evaluated against a recent collection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates (201 ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae [153 Escherichia coli and 48 Klebsiella pneumoniae] and 201 P. aeruginosa). Comparator agents included amikacin, tobramycin, ciprofloxacin, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime piperacillin-tazobactam, imipenem, and meropenem. Both doripenem and meropenem inhibited 100% of the ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae at ≤0.5 μg/mL. For these isolates, the MIC₉₀ of doripenem (0.12 μg/mL) was 4-fold lower than that of imipenem (0.5 μg/mL). Against P. aeruginosa, the MIC₉₀ of doripenem and meropenem was 2 μg/mL, 4-fold lower than that of imipenem (8 μg/mL). At an MIC of ≤2 μg/mL, doripenem, meropenem, and imipenem inhibited 90.5%, 89.6%, and 82.1% of P. aeruginosa isolates, respectively. Doripenem maintained activity against imipenem-nonsusceptible isolates of P. aeruginosa; at an MIC of ≤4 μg/mL, it inhibited 15 of the 25 isolates with MICs for imipenem of >4 μg/mL. Doripenem is active against ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolates. Its activity is similar to that of meropenem and slightly better than that of imipenem. The results of this study suggest that doripenem could be an alternative therapeutic agent for infections caused by these organisms.     

P594 Intracellular killing of drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by different antibiotics

Objectives:  The aim of this study was to assess the carbapenem susceptibility of four nosocomial pathogens and to evaluate the reliability of the susceptibility results determined by E-test and disc diffusion (DD) methods.
Methods:  Escherichia coli ( n  = 73), Klebsiella pneumoniae ( n  = 60), Pseudomonas aeruginosa ( n  = 70) and Acinetobacter spp. ( n  = 70) isolated from nosocomial infections in 2002–2003 were included in the study. Thirty-five per cent of the strains were isolated from intensive care units. After determining antimicrobial susceptibility against imipenem and meropenem by DD (10  μ g; Oxoid, UK) and Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) methods, the results were categorised as susceptible (S), intermediate (I) and resistant (R) according to the NCCLS criteria. For statistical analyses, the intermediate group was included in the resistant category because of the low numbers of bacteria in the former group.
Results:  None of E. coli or K. pneumoniae strains were resistant to carbapenems, whereas, resistance reached up to 59.0% in Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa isolates. By either method, the pattern of the susceptibility of the four bacteria was not statistically significantly different for imipenem vs. meropenem. Total agreement of DD and E-test methods for susceptibility to imipenem was 95.7%, and 90.0% in Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa , respectively; and susceptibility to meropenem was 90.0% for both bacteria. However, the difference of the results obtained by either method was statistically significant for Acinetobacter spp.
Conclusion:  Study results suggest a high resistance rate for Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa strains against carbapenem antibiotics in our hospital. Further studies are needed to clarify whether E-test should be used to confirm meropenem resistance of Acinetobacter spp. determined by DD method.     

In vitro activities of doripenem and other carbapenems against clinically important bacteria isolated in intensive care units: nationwide data from the SMART Programme

This nationwide surveillance of clinically important bacteria from the intensive care units (ICUs) of major teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan investigated the susceptibilities to doripenem and other comparator carbapenems from September through November 2005. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined for 1,311 clinical isolates using the broth microdilution method according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2005 guidelines. Doripenem showed similar (within four-fold difference of MICs) in vitro activity to meropenem for Enterobacteriaceae and probably comparable activity to meropenem against important nosocomial non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (NFGNBs), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii and Burkholderia cepacia. Among the four carbapenems analysed, doripenem and meropenem exhibited better in vitro activity than imipenem or ertapenem against extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli isolates. However, the meropenem MIC₉₀ against ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates was 2 µg/ml. Besides, doripenem with the MIC₉₀ of 0.5 µg/ml to Streptococcus pneumoniae possibly suggested its potential therapeutic effect regarding community-acquired pneumonia. Because of the heavy resistance burden in Taiwan, closely monitoring the evolutionary trend of carbapenem susceptibilities against clinically important pathogens is crucial in the future.     

Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter spp.: increasingly problematic nosocomial pathogens

Pathogenic bacteria have increasingly been resisting to antimicrobial therapy. Recently, resistance problem has been relatively much worsened in Gram-negative bacilli. Acinetobacter spp. are typical nosocomial pathogens causing infections and high mortality, almost exclusively in compromised hospital patients. Acinetobacter spp. are intrinsically less susceptible to antibiotics than Enterobacteriaceae, and have propensity to acquire resistance. A surveillance study in Korea in 2009 showed that resistance rates of Acinetobacter spp. were very high: to fluoroquinolone 67%, to amikacin 48%, to ceftazidime 66% and to imipenem 51%. Carbapenem resistance was mostly due to OXA type carbapenemase production in A. baumannii isolates, whereas it was due to metallo-β-lactamase production in non-baumannii Acinetobacter isolates. Colistin-resistant isolates were rare but started to be isolated in Korea. Currently, the infection caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii is among the most difficult ones to treat. Analysis at tertiary care hospital in 2010 showed that among the 1,085 isolates of Acinetobacter spp., 14.9% and 41.8% were resistant to seven, and to all eight antimicrobial agents tested, respectively. It is known to be difficult to prevent Acinetobacter spp. infection in hospitalized patients, because the organisms are ubiquitous in hospital environment. Efforts to control resistant bacteria in Korea by hospitals, relevant scientific societies and government agencies have only partially been successful. We need concerted multidisciplinary efforts to preserve the efficacy of currently available antimicrobial agents, by following the principles of antimicrobial stewardship.     

Antimicrobial activity of the new carbapenem biapenem compared to imipenem,meropenem and other broad-spectrum beta-lactam drugs

The in vitro activity of biapenem was compared to that of imipenem, meropenem and other broad-spectrum beta-lactams. A total of 716 isolates from recent cases of clinical septicemia and an additional 137 stock strains possessing known beta-lactamases or other well-characterized resistance mechanisms were tested. The minimal concentrations inhibiting 90 % of strains (MIC90) ofEnterobacteriaceae species were for biapenem 0.03 to 1 mg/l and for imipenem 0.25 to 2 mg/l. No member of theEnterobacteriaceae was found to be resistant to biapenem. Biapenem and meropenem were the most active drugs againstPseudomonas aeruginosa, with an MIC90 of 1 mg/l. Biapenem was more active than ceftazidime against most gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria tested. Biapenem was as potent as imipenem against anaerobic bacteria (includingBacteroides fragilis), with an MIC90 of 0.25 mg/l. High MICs of biapenem were demonstrated forXanthomonas maltophilia, oxacillin-resistantStaphylococcus spp. andEnterococcus spp. These species have demonstrated resistance to other carbapenems and to most of the newer cephalosporins. The results of this study, coupled with previously documented favorable qualities of biapenem, endorse further investigation of this broad-spectrum antibacterial agent for clinical use.     

Comparative activity of meropenem (SM-7338) against major respiratory pathogens and amikacin-resistant nosocomial isolates

Meropenem, a new broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic, demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against major respiratory pathogens includingMoraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae andStreptococcus pneumoniae. Minimal inhibitory concentrations of meropenem forMoraxella catarrhalis andHaemophilus influenzae isolates were frequently less than those of imipenem. For nosocomial amikacin-resistant gram-negative bacilli, meropenem had eightfold lower MIC90 values compared to imipenem against strains ofSerratia marcescens, Enterobacter cloacae andEscherichia coli; it was 32-fold more active than imipenem againstProteus mirabilis isolates. Activity was similar to that of imipenem againstPseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Overall, meropenem showed excellent activity against common community-acquired pathogens as well as amikacin-resistant nosocomial pathogens.     

The activity of meropenem and comparators against Acinetobacter strains isolated from European hospitals, 1997–2000

In vitro susceptibilities to meropenem and comparators of Acinetobacter strains isolated from serious infections in 37 European hospital centers participating in the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program (1997–2000) were tested. There were 635 Acinetobacter strains collected: 490 A. baumannii ; 51 A. calcoaceticus var . lwoffii ; and 94 other Acinetobacter strains. Overall, meropenem and imipenem were the most effective agents tested. Resistance to the antimicrobials was: 14%, meropenem; 16%, imipenem; 39%, piperacillin–tazobactam; 41%, tobramycin; 45%, ceftazidime; and 53%, ciprofloxacin. Thus, the carbapenems have useful activity against Acinetobacter spp. and represent a viable choice for treating infections caused by these organisms.     

Global assessment of the antimicrobial activity of polymyxin B against 54 731 clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli: report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance programme (2001–2004)

In total, 54 731 Gram-negative bacilli isolated worldwide between 2001 and 2004 from diverse sites of infection were tested for susceptibility to polymyxin B by the broth reference microdilution method, with interpretation of results according to CLSI (formerly NCCLS) guidelines. Polymyxin B showed excellent potency and spectrum against 8705 Pseudomonas aeruginosa and 2621 Acinetobacter spp. isolates (MIC50, < or = 1 mg/L and MIC90, 2 mg/L for both pathogens). Polymyxin B resistance rates were slightly higher for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (2.7%) and Acinetobacter spp. (2.8%), or multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa (3.3%) and Acinetobacter spp. (3.2%), when compared with the entire group (1.3% for P. aeruginosa and 2.1% for Acinetobacter spp.). Among P. aeruginosa, polymyxin B resistance rates varied from 2.9% in the Asia-Pacific region to only 1.1% in Europe, Latin America and North America, while polymyxin B resistance rates ranged from 2.7% in Europe to 1.7% in North America and Latin America among Acinetobacter spp. Polymyxin B also demonstrated excellent activity (MIC90, < or = 1 mg/L; > 98% susceptible) against Citrobacter spp., Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp., but activity was more variable against Enterobacter spp. (MIC50, < or = 1 mg/L; 83.3% susceptible) and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (MIC50, < or = 1 mg/L; 72.4% susceptible), and was very limited (MIC50, > 8 mg/L) against Burkholderia cepacia (11.8% susceptible), Serratia spp. (5.4% susceptible), indole-positive Proteus spp. (1.3% susceptible) and Proteus mirabilis (0.7% susceptible).     

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of carbapenems: multicenter validity testing and accuracy levels of five antimicrobial test methods for detecting resistance in Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates

From January 1996 to May 1999, Project ICARE (Intensive Care Antimicrobial Resistance Epidemiology) received 448 nonduplicate clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were reported to be imipenem intermediate or resistant. However, broth microdilution (BMD) confirmatory testing at the Project ICARE central laboratory confirmed this result in only 11 of 123 (8.9%) Enterobacteriaceae isolates and 241 of 325 (74.2%) P. aeruginosa isolates. To investigate this overdetection of imipenem resistance, we tested 204 selected isolates from the Project ICARE collection plus five imipenem-resistant challenge strains at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention against imipenem and meropenem by agar dilution, disk diffusion, Etest (AB BIODISK North America, Inc., Piscataway, N.J.), two MicroScan WalkAway conventional panels (Neg MIC Plus 3 and Neg Urine Combo 3) (Dade MicroScan, Inc., West Sacramento, Calif.), and two Vitek cards (GNS-116 containing meropenem and GNS-F7 containing imipenem) (bioMérieux Vitek, Inc., Durham, N.C.). The results of each test method were compared to the results of BMD testing using in-house-prepared panels. Seven imipenem-resistant and five meropenem-resistant isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and 43 imipenem-resistant and 21 meropenem-resistant isolates of P. aeruginosa were identified by BMD. For Enterobacteriaceae, the imipenem and meropenem test methods produced low numbers of very major and major errors. All test systems in the study produced low numbers of very major and major errors when P. aeruginosa was tested against imipenem and meropenem, except for Vitek testing (major error rate for imipenem, 20%). Further testing conducted in 11 of the participating ICARE hospital laboratories failed to pinpoint the factors responsible for the initial overdetection of imipenem resistance. However, this study demonstrated that carbapenem testing difficulties do exist and that laboratories should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate carbapenem-intermediate and -resistant results.     

Imipenem resistance in nonfermenters causing nosocomial urinary tract infections

Nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli (nonfermenters) have emerged as important nosocomial pathogens causing opportunistic infections in immunocompromised hosts. These organisms show high level of resistance to b-lactam agents, fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Imipenem is a carbapenem antibiotic, which can be very useful for treatment of infections caused by nonfermenters. Eighty-five nonfermenters causing nosocomial UTI were tested for MIC to imipenem by agar dilution method. Resistance to other antimicrobial agents was compared between imipenem sensitive (S) and resistance (R) groups. Overall 36.4% of nonfermenters were resistant to imipenem. Forty two percent of P. aeruginosa and 18.5% of Acinetobacter baumanii were imipenem resistant. Other nonfermenters showed variable resistance, resistance in Alcaligenes spp. being very high. More than 70% of the nonfermenters were resistant to ceftazidime, gentamicin and ciprofloxacin. Piperacillin and amikacin had the best in vitro susceptibility. No significant difference was found in the antibiotic susceptibility profile among imipenem sensitive (S) or resistant (R) strains.     

Pseudomonas aeruginosa--a significant hospital pathogen and resistance to carbapenem

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) is an etiologic agent of nosocomial infections of various localizations. The frequency of infections is a consequence of an increased number of immunocompromised patients, large surgical interventions, long-term hospital care and virulence factors of the bacterium. The use of carbapenems in the treatment of infections caused by P. aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacteria entail an unfortunate consequence of creating resistance to carbapenems. P. aeruginosa exhibits numerous mechanisms of resistance and is singularly problematic for combining intrinsic resistance and acquired resistance due to multiple mutations. It is also a carrier of the multiple-resistance plasmide. Carbapenems are a class of beta-lactam antibiotics with broad-spectrum activity to gram-positive, gram-negative and strictly anaerobic bacteria. The resistance of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems is complex and heterogeneous. It is determined by weakening the penetration through the outer membrane due to the loss of porin D2, decrease in the accumulation of antibiotic in the cell consequentially to active efflux due to hyperproduction of proteins, hydrolysis of carbapenem by specific metallo-beta-carbapenemases, and alteration in the target area of antibiotic activity on the bacterial cell. The loss of porin D2 results in resistance to imipenem with MIC values of 8.0-32.0 microg/mL. Selective low-level resistance to meropenem in the hyperproduction of the efflux system results in MIC values of 2.0-4.0 microg/mL. A high-level resistance to carbapenems with MIC values above 128 microg/mL for imipenem and meropenem is a consequence of the secretion of IMP and VIM series beta-carbapenemases. The frequency of resistance to P. aeruginosa to carbapenems varies worldwide from 15% to > or = 35%. In Croatia, resistance to carbapenems in the year 2003 was estimated to 12%. The problems in clinical practice are the increased resistance of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems, the presence of beta-carbapenemases and acquisition of these enzymes in certain types of Enterobacteriacea. The problems in laboratory practice are those of precise determination of the level and phenotype resistance of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems.     

Antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria causing urinary tract infections in Latin American hospitals: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (1997)

Objectives: To evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among 469 pathogens isolated as a significant cause of urinary tract infections in 10 Latin American medical centers.
Methods: Consecutively collected isolates were susceptibility tested by broth microdilution methods, and selected isolates were characterized by molecular typing methods.
Results: Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates revealed high rates of resistance to broad-spectrum penicillins and to fluoroquinolones. Ceftazidime MICs of ≥2 mg/L, suggesting the production of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), were observed in 37.7% of K. pneumoniae and 8.3% of Escherichia coli isolates. Enterobacter spp. isolates were characterized by high resistance rates to ciprofloxacin (35%) and to ceftazidime (45%), but they generally remained susceptible to cefepime (95% susceptible). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. were highly resistant to ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime. Imipenem was active against 80% of P. aeruginosa and 93% of Acinetobacter spp. isolates.
Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a high level of resistance to various classes of antimicrobial agents among isolates causing nosocomial urinary tract infections in Latin American hospitals. Clonal dissemination of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae strains was infrequent.     

Antibacterial Activity of Meropenem against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Including Antibiotic-Induced Morphological Changes and Endotoxin-Liberating Effects

 The in vitro effects of meropenem on Pseudomonas aeruginosa were examined by studying (i) the inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of meropenem versus those of imipenem for clinical isolates; (ii) changes in bacterial morphology during in vitro culture; and (iii) release of endotoxin induced by meropenem compared with that induced by other antipseudomonal compounds. Meropenem MIC90 and MBC90 values for 108 clinical isolates were 2 and 4.8 mg/l compared to 4.5 and 9.6 mg/l for imipenem. Morphological studies using phase-contrast and scanning electron microscopy showed that meropenem induced the formation of indeterminate bacterial cell forms at drug concentrations of 1–2.5 mg/l (0.5- to 1.25-fold the MIC), while spheroplasts predominated at drug levels exceeding 5 mg/l (2.5-fold the MIC). Determination of free and EDTA-releasable endotoxin activity by means of the Limulus lysate test showed that both meropenem and imipenem liberated significantly less endotoxin than did ceftazidime. Therefore, although meropenem binds to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) 2 and 3 (in contrast to imipenem, which binds to PBP2 only), endotoxin release should not be a cause of concern when treating systemic gram-negative infections with this drug.     

In vitro activity of tigecycline and comparators against gram-negative bacteria isolated from a tertiary hospital in Alexandria, Egypt

The emergence of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, in particular Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, has necessitated the search for alternative therapy by either introducing new agents or renewing interest in old agents. This study compares the in vitro activity of tigecycline (TIG), recently introduced to Egyptian market, to other potentially active antimicrobials as Colistin (COL), imipenem (IPM), levofloxacin (LEV), and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZ) against 67 Gram-negative clinical isolates obtained from El- Meery Hospital in Alexandria, Egypt. El-Meery Hospital is a 1,500-bed tertiary teaching hospital where TIG has not been previously used. Based on MIC(90)s, TIG was found to be a comparator to IPM and COL (MIC(90)= 8?μg/ml). LEV and PIP/TAZ were less active than TIG exhibiting high MIC(90)s. TIG inhibited 100% of Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae and 60% of Ps. aeruginosa and A. baumannii isolates. In time-kill studies against IPM-resistant isolates, TIG showed bactericidal activity after 6 hours of contact against the Enterobacteriaceae isolates and after 3 hours for the tested Ps. aeruginosa isolates at 4× and 8× MIC. Against A. baumannii, TIG exerted a bacteriostatic effect. TIG demonstrated variable ability to suppress biofilm formation affecting mainly E. coli and A. baumannii isolates. These results point TIG to be a promising agent in treatment of infections caused by strains for which adequate therapy has been limited. As far as we know, this is the first report evaluating the in vitro activity of TIG against Egyptian clinical isolates.     

In vitro activity of ertapenem against anaerobes isolated from the respiratory tract

Ertapenem is a novel parenteral carbapenem with a long serum half-life. Its spectrum of activity is similar to that of imipenem and meropenem against Gram-positive bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae and fastidious Gram-negative bacteria but it is less active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter spp. Several studies were performed in the United States but only one European study has shown that ertapenem has an excellent activity against anaerobes. The objectives of the present study were to test the activity of ertapenem against anaerobes isolated prospectively from the lower and upper respiratory tracts, and to compare their susceptibility with that of anaerobic isolates from other body sites. Fifty-three isolates from the respiratory tract, as well as 50 isolates from various other body sites were tested with E-tests against six antibiotics. For respiratory isolates and for isolates from other sites, MIC 90 values (mg/l) were, respectively, >32 and >32 for penicillin, 0.38 and 0.75 for amoxicillin/clavulanate, 48 and >256 for ceftriaxone, 0.12 and 0.75 for ertapenem, 12 and >256 for clindamycin and 2 and 12 for moxifloxacin. The higher susceptibility of respiratory tract isolates was mainly due to the different distribution of isolated species: only three respiratory isolates but 22 other isolates belonged to the Bacteroides fragilis group. This study confirms the excellent anti-anaerobic activity of ertapenem against anaerobic isolates from the respiratory tract.     

Comparison of in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against aerobic bacterial pathogens from patients with nosocomial infections.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is a rapid worldwide emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens, especially in nosocomial isolates. This study compared the in vitro activities of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, and piperacillin-tazobactam against 208 aerobic bacterial pathogens that caused 197 nosocomial infections in 184 patients. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by E test in accordance with the guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. RESULTS: Most (140/208, 67%) of the isolates were facultative Gram-negative bacilli. Levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were the most effective (22/22, 100%) against oxacillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. None of the antibiotics tested were found to be effective (0/25) against oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. Of the 11 isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii that were not pandrug-resistant (PDR), only 9 isolates (9/11, 81%) were sensitive to imipenem and 5 isolates (5/11, 45%) were sensitive to levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime. Another 22 isolates of A. baumannii that were PDR were completely resistant to all 6 antibiotics. The majority of isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were sensitive to these 6 antimicrobial agents with 10/11 (91%) sensitive to levofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, 9/11 (83%) sensitive to ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam, and 8/11 (75%) sensitive to imipenem. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the bacterial isolates causing nosocomial infections were found to be sensitive to the 6 antibiotics tested. Bacterial isolates of nosocomial infections that were completely resistant to these 6 antibiotics were PDR A. baumannii, PDR P. aeruginosa, and oxacillin-resistant S. aureus. More potent antimicrobial agents are needed to treat infections caused by PDR A. baumannii and PDR P. aeruginosa.