Serological speciation of human T-cell leukaemia virus infections using synthetic peptide antigens

In order to assess the specificity and sensitivity of two peptide-based assays (Synth^TM HTLV-I and HTLV-II enzyme-linked immunoassay [EIA] [UBI] and Select-HTLV^TM EIA [IAF]) in discriminating between antibody to HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection, a panel of 186 well-characterised serum/plasma samples was tested by the two assays. The panel comprised 160 samples that by Western blot were confirmed to contain antibodies to HTLV-I/II and 26 samples that showed reactivity with gag but not env gene products. Both assays were found to be specific in that they did not misclassify any of the 80 specimens from cases of tropical spastic paraparesis or adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma, diseases believed to be HTLV-I associated, as anti-HTLV-II positive. Of the 160 specimens confirmed as anti-HTLV-I/II positive by Western blot, 6.2% were negative or untypable in the Synth EIA compared with 13.7% in the Select EIA. Of the 26 Western blot indeterminate samples, 16 were negative by both assays. Five were typed as anti-HTLV-I by both assays and 5 as anti HTLV-II by Select EIA only. The peptide based EIAs offer an economical and, in most cases, reliable means of discriminating between anti-HTLV-I and anti-HTLV-II. However, they should only be applied to sera that have been confirmed by Western blot or other methods as anti-HTLV-I/II positive. Even then they may fail to speciate sera from non-Japanese, non-Afrocaribbean populations. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Prevalence of infection by human T-cell leukemia virus types I and II in southern Spain

To assess the spread of human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV) type I and II in different population groups at potential risk of infection in Spain, a total of 756 subjects were studied: 453 belonging to groups at risk for retrovirus infection, 255 with diseases potentially linked to HTLV-I/II infection and 48 immigrants from endemic areas. An HTLV-I viral-lysate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with a recombinant transmembrane envelope protein incorporated was used to screen serum samples. Reactive specimens were confirmed by Western blot strips spiked with recombinant proteins that differentiated HTLV-I from HTLV-II. Infection was then verified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Serum samples from 19 of the 756 subjects analyzed (2.5 %) were reactive for HTLV by EIA. One of these was from an intravenous drug user (IVDU) in whom HTLV-II infection was confirmed by Western blot and PCR; a specimen from another IVDU showed Western blot reactivity for both retroviruses, but PCR results were negative. Lastly, Western blot confirmed the presence of HTLV in one of the immigrant subjects. Western blot did not verify HTLV infection in the remaining 16 cases, indicating a high rate of nonspecific anti-HTLV reactivity when a second-generation EIA screening test was applied. These results suggest that HTLV is present in Spain among populations at high risk for HTLV, although at a very low rate and restricted to intravenous drug users and individuals immigrating from endemic areas.     

Evaluation of two commercial human T-cell lymphotropic virus western blot (immunoblot) kits with problem specimens.

We evaluated two commercial human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) Western blot (WB; immunoblot) kits, Cambridge Biotech Corp. (CBC) and Diagnostic Biotechnology Ltd. (DBL). Both methods employ HTLV type I (HTLV-I) viral lysate and rgp21. The DBL WB kit also distinguishes between HTLV-I and HTLV-II antibodies, using an HTLV-I-specific and an HTLV-II-specific recombinant. Fifty weakly reactive HTLV-II-positive plasma specimens which were falsely negative with the Abbott enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and 50 Ortho EIA false-positive samples were selected to determine sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivities of the CBC and the DBL WB kits were 90 and 68%, respectively. All positive samples reacted with rgp21 in both kits, but some did not display core bands. Five samples were typed as HTLV-I and four were typed as dual infection by the DBL WB kit. The specificities of the CBC and DBL kits were 48 and 70%, respectively. The most prevalent WB reaction with the negative samples was with the core protein, p19, followed by p24 and p28 for CBC and rgp21 and p28 for DBL. DBL had two false-positive interpretations, and CBC had none, rgp21 was the most sensitive antigen in both kits for the weakly reactive HTLV-II samples. If all samples not reacting with this protein were interpreted as WB negative, regardless of other bands, the specificity would improve to 90% for CBC and 86% for DBL.     

Human T lymphotropic virus types I and II proviral sequences in Argentinian blood donors with indeterminate Western blot patterns

Human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV) seroindeterminate blood donors have been reported worldwide including Argentina. To investigate the significance of HTLV-I/II seroindeterminate Western blot (WB) patterns, we conducted an 8-year cross-sectional study. Of 86,238 Argentinian blood donors, 146 sera were reactive by screening tests. The WB results indicated that 20% were HTLV-I reactive, 8% HTLV-II reactive, 61% indeterminate, and 11% negative. The overall seroprevalence was 0.034% for HTLV-I, 0.014% for HTLV-II, and 0.103% for indeterminate. In 57 reactive specimens, HTLV-I/II provirus could be examined by type specific PCR for tax, pol, and env regions. When at least two gene fragments were amplified HTLV-I/II infection was considered confirmed. PCR results confirmed all WB seropositive samples for HTLV-I (n = 15), and HTLV-II (n = 7), and the only WB negative case was also PCR negative, showing a complete concordance between PCR and WB. However, of 34 WB seroindeterminate sera studied by PCR, in 5 was proviral DNA amplified. According to our criteria PCR confirmed one to be HTLV-I, and one HTLV-II, 3 remained indeterminate since only tax sequences were amplified. Among WB indeterminate samples tested by PCR, most of their serological profile showed reactivity to gag codified proteins but lacked env reactivities (70%). One sample with a WB gag pattern showed proviral tax sequences, but of the four samples with reactivity to env proteins GD21 (n = 3) or rgp46II (n = 1) PCR results indicated that one was HTLV-I, one was HTLV-II, and two were indeterminate (only tax sequences). In conclusion, the majority of HTLV-seroindeterminate WB donors exhibited a gag indeterminate profile lacking HTLV provirus, and were thus considered uninfected. However, seroreactivity to env proteins, in particular to GD21, may indicate infection and a follow-up study of each seroreactive blood donor should be considered.     

Detection of antibodies to trans-activator protein (p40taxI) of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I by a synthetic peptide-based assay.

Antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) trans-activator protein (p40taxI) were determined in serum specimens from individuals infected with HTLV-I (n = 138) and HTLV-II (n = 19). Western blot (immunoblot) analysis using recombinant tax demonstrated the presence of anti-tax antibodies in 96% of patients (25 of 26) with HTLV-I-associated myelopathy, 43% of those (20 of 46) with adult T-cell leukemia, and 61% of asymptomatic HTLV-I blood donors (40 of 66); only one of the HTLV-II specimens reacted with the recombinant tax protein. Synthetic peptides (Tax8(106-125), Tax22(316-335), Tax-23(331-350), and Tax-24(336-353) representing the immunodominant epitopes of¿ p40taxI detected anti-tax antibodies in 66 (48%), 50 (36%), 66 (48%), and 64 (46%) of 138 HTLV-I-positive specimens, respectively. An enzyme immunoassay using an equimolar ratio of these four peptides allowed sensitive detection of anti-tax antibodies in 96% of patients (25 of 26) with HTLV-1-associated myelopathy, 52% of adult T-cell leukemia patients (24 of 46), and 62% of asymptomatic HTLV-1-infected donors (41 of 66). The synthetic peptide-based cocktail assay was HTLV-I specific, since none of the HTLV-II-infected specimens reacted with these peptides. Interestingly, the corresponding regions from the HTLV-II tax protein, Tax8II(106-125), and Tax-22II(312-331) did not react with either HTLV-II or HTLV-I specimens. Thus, a synthetic peptide-based assay composed of immunodominant epitopes located towards the amino terminus and the C terminus of p40taxI provides a reliable and sensitive assay for the detection of anti-tax antibodies in seroepidemiologic studies.     

Agreement study between two laboratories of immunofluorescence as a confirmatory test for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 antibody screening.

A total of 114 serum specimens from 76 blood donors, 21 patients with acquired immune deficiency syndrome or acquired immune deficiency syndrome-related complex, 7 multiply transfused patients, 3 hemophiliacs, and 7 others were tested for anti-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) antibody by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot (WB) and then blindly tested by immunofluorescence (IF), independently, in two separate laboratories. The IF technique used acetone-fixed HIV-1-infected E cells and uninfected HUT-78 cells mixed at a 1:3 ratio in one spot on a glass slide and uninfected HUT-78 cells (to assess nonspecific fluorescence) alone in a second spot. Of 114 serum specimens, 85 were repeat EIA positive, and 21 of these were WB positive. A total of 129 of 134 of the IF results (included were 20 duplicates) were identical between laboratories, for a Kappa agreement statistic of 0.93. All five IF results discordant between laboratories were EIA repeat positive and WB negative. Included in the study were eight WB-indeterminate sera, of which five blood donor serum specimens and one hemophiliac serum specimen were IF negative and two acquired immune deficiency syndrome serum specimens were IF positive. As a confirmatory test for HIV-1 antibodies, IF provided a faster alternative or supplementary test for confirming EIA results.     

Molecular characterization of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-II) from people living in urban areas of Sao Paulo city: evidence of multiple subtypes circulation

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and type II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) are co-circulating and possess approximately 65% homology, which results in high cross-reactivity in serological tests. Based on the detection of EIA and Western blot (WB) tests, HTLV serodiagnosis yields indeterminate results in high-risk population, with the true determination of HTLV-II prevalence requiring a combined serological and molecular analysis. Molecular analysis of HTLV-II isolates has shown the existence of four distinct subtypes: IIa, IIb, IIc, and IId. The aim of this study was to evaluate the routine EIA and WB used in Sao Paulo city, as well as molecular methods for confirmation of infection and HTLV-II subtype distribution. Results: Two hundred ninety-three individuals, who were enrolled in the HTLV out-clinic in Sao Paulo city, Brazil, between July 1997 and May 2003, were tested by EIAs, and positive sera 232 (79%) reactive by one of the tests. When these sera were tested by WB revealed 134 were HTLV-I, 28 HTLV-II, 4 HTLV-I/II, and 48 were indeterminate. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on the indeterminate group showed that 20 (42%) were HTLV-II and 28 were negative. From a total of 48 HTLV-II subjects with DNA available, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the env region revealed 47 HTLV-IIa and 1 HTLV-IIb. The phylogenetic analysis was performed on 23 samples, which identified 19 as subtype a, Brazilian subcluster, and 4 as subtype b. This is the first time HTLV-II subtype b has been described in Brazil. However, further studies, such as a complete nucleotide DNA sequencing, need to be done to confirm these findings.     

Human T-lymphotropic virus type I/II. Status of enzyme immunoassay and western blot testing in the United States in 1989 and 1990.

In three performance evaluation surveys, panels that consisted of human T-lymphotropic virus type I or type II (HTLV-I/II) antibody-positive and -negative plasma samples were mailed to laboratories that voluntarily participated in the Centers for Disease Control Model Performance Evaluation Program. Donor samples were identical among surveys. In each survey, more than 98% of the laboratories reported enzyme immunoassay (EIA) test results; about 11% also reported results of Western blot (WB) testing. Variation in analytic sensitivity (96.7% to 99.4%) and specificity (98.3% to 99.5%) of EIA tests was noted in the three surveys. For WB testing, no nonreactive interpretations were reported for HTLV-I/II antibody-positive samples in any survey; however, indeterminate interpretations were reported for 35.2% to 40.7% of the WB tests that were performed on HTLV-I/II antibody-positive samples. More than 95% of these indeterminate WB test interpretations were reported for HTLV-II antibody-positive samples. Although HTLV-I/II antibody tests are generally sensitive and specific, their accuracy could be further improved by increasing the specificity of EIA tests and the sensitivity of WB tests.     

Differential antibody responsiveness to p19 gag results in serological discrimination between human T lymphotropic virus type I and type II.

A new algorithm based upon the differential antibody responses to two gag gene products (p19 and p24) of human T lymphotropic virus (HTLV) has been suggested for serologic discrimination of HTLV type I (HTLV-I) and type II (HTLV-II) [Lillihoj et al., 1990]. To evaluate the practical usefulness of this algorithm, serum specimens from HTLV-seropositive individuals whose infection was confirmed by PCR analysis to be HTLV-I (n = 60) or HTLV-II (n = 61) were analyzed by western blot. The intensities of the antibody response to p24gag and p19gag were scored by one individual without prior knowledge of PCR results. According to the algorithm, specimens with p19 greater than or equal to p24 were classified as HTLV-I, whereas specimens with p19 less than p24 were classified as HTLV-II. Of 60 PCR confirmed HTLV-I specimens, 56 had p19 greater than or equal to p24 (93%) while 4 had p19 less than p24. Of 61 PCR confirmed HTLV-II specimens, 56 had p19 less than p24 (92%) and 5 had p19 greater than or equal to p24. The overall accuracy of serologic differentiation when using this algorithm was 92%, as 4 of 60 HTLV-I (7%) and 5 of 61 HTLV-II (8%) could have been wrongly classified. Although the differential antibody response to p19gag and p24gag provides a simple means of serologically distinguishing between HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection in population-based epidemiological studies, in a clinical context more accurate means of confirmation are required. The dominant p19gag responses were mapped to the C-terminus of p19 (p19(102-117)).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of Western immunoblot antigens and interpretive criteria for detection of antibody to human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II.

Twenty human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) antibody-positive sera from Japan, Hawaii, and the Marshall Islands and 15 HTLV type II (HTLV-II) antibody-positive sera from intravenous drug users in the United States were tested by immunoblotting with two recombinant HTLV-I proteins and three commercial kits to determine whether there were any differences in reactions between HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-positive sera by the Western immunoblot method and, also, to evaluate the ability of these reagents to detect HTLV-I- and HTLV-II-seropositive individuals by using the recommended Western blot interpretation. These sera were first extensively characterized by immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay, radioimmunoprecipitation assay, and Western blot using HTLV-I and HTLV-II viral lysates and an envelope (env) recombinant protein. Although both HTLV-I- and HTLV-II antibody-positive sera reacted with the env protein gp68, reactions with the gp46 env antigens appeared to be specific for HTLV-I. It was found that the use of either p19 or p24 core bands plus an env reaction instead of only the p24 plus env reaction (as presently recommended) increased the number of positive interpretations for HTLV-I but had no effect on the number of HTLV-II-positive interpretations.     

Synthetic peptide-based immunoassays for distinguishing between human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and type II infections in seropositive individuals

Until now, serologic tests that distinguish the closely related human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I (HTLV-I) and II (HTLV-II) infections have not been available. Synthetic peptide assays, employing peptides derived from the core and envelope proteins of HTLV-I and HTLV-II (SynthEIA and Select-HTLV tests), were evaluated for the ability to serologically discriminate HTLV-I and HTLV-II infections. Of 32 HTLV-I- and 57 HTLV-II-positive serum specimens from individuals whose infections were confirmed by polymerase chain reaction, the SynthEIA test categorized 29 (91%) as HTLV-I and 50 (88%) as HTLV-II, and 10 (11%) were nontypeable. In contrast, the Select-HTLV test categorized 32 (100%) as HTLV-I and 55 (96%) as HTLV-II, and 2 (2%) were nontypeable. The specificity of both the assays in seropositive serum specimens was 100% in that none of the specimens were incorrectly classified. Additional serum specimens obtained from clinically diseased patients from the United States (n = 8) and asymptomatic carriers and patients from Japan (an endemic population for HTLV-I; n = 40) were categorized as HTLV-I by at least one of the assays, while serum specimens from Guaymi Indians from Panama (an endemic population for HTLV-II; n = 13) were categorized as HTLV-II. Thus, peptide enzyme immunoassays appear to represent a simple technique employing chemically synthesized antigens for discrimination between antibodies of HTLV-I and HTLV-II.     

Comparison of detection of antibody to the acquired immune deficiency syndrome virus by enzyme immunoassay, immunofluorescence, and Western blot methods.

There was 100% agreement between enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Abbott Laboratories), Western blot, and indirect immunofluorescence (IF) when these three methods were used to measure antibody to the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) virus in sera from 142 high-risk individuals, indicating that IF was a sensitive alternative method for detecting antibody to this agent. Thirty-two (64%) of 50 EIA-positive plasma specimens from a blood bank and 6 (21%) of 28 EIA-positive sera from alternative testing sites were negative by IF. In addition, two EIA-negative sera from the latter group were positive by IF. Western blotting agreed with IF on those 40 specimens which gave discrepant results by EIA and IF. The IF method was determined to be equal to Western blotting in sensitivity and specificity for detection of AIDS antibody, and it was found to be useful for confirming positive EIA results, especially in specimens from individuals in low-risk groups.     

Utility of quantitative enzyme immunoassay reactivity for predicting human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity in low- and high-prevalence populations.

To assess the utility of quantitative enzyme immunoassay (EIA) reactivity for predicting human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity, we evaluated 22,823 serum samples from homo- and bisexual men, heterosexual intravenous drug users, and other heterosexuals with initial screening by EIA, retesting of reactive samples in duplicate, and confirmatory Western blot (immunoblot) testing. Quantitative EIA reactivity was determined by a mean of the optical density ratio of the three assays performed for each reactive specimen. A total of 1,773 samples (7.8%) were repeatedly reactive, and 1,747 (7.7%) were confirmed Western blot positive. All 26 EIA-reactive-Western blot-negative samples had low-level EIA reactivity (ratio < 2.2), while most (86%) of the Western blot-positive samples had high-level reactivity (ratio, > 3.0). The positive predictive value for samples with moderate-to-high-level EIA reactivity (ratio, > 2.2) was 100% for all risk groups. These results support the value of quantitative EIA reactivity in predicting human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity and suggest that confirmatory testing of specimens with high-level reactivity is not necessary in all situations.     

Immune Response against the Exp-1 Protein of Plasmodium falciparum Results in Antibodies That Cross-React with Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus Type 1 Proteins

To examine the role of the Plasmodium falciparum Exp-1 blood-stage protein in producing antibodies that cross-react with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) proteins, we studied sera from Indonesian volunteers who seroconverted to malaria after transmigrating to an area where malaria is hyperendemic. Samples from Philippine volunteers, that were used in a prior study that examined malaria antibodies that cross-react with HTLV-I proteins, were also used. Eighty-three percent of the Indonesian transmigrants developed antibodies against the malaria Exp-1 protein by 6 months postmigration. Of these malaria seroconverters, 27% developed false-positive HTLV-I enzyme immunoassay (EIA) immunoreactivity, as indicated by indeterminate HTLV-I Western blot banding patterns. Five of the six Philippine samples tested were HTLV-I EIA false positive and Western blot indeterminate. When a recombinant Exp-1 protein was used in blocking experiments, the HTLV-I Western blot immunoreactivity of sera from both groups was either completely eliminated or greatly reduced. No effect on the Western blot immunoreactivity of truly HTLV-I-positive sera was seen. To determine if immunization with the recombinant Exp-1 protein could elicit the production of HTLV-I antibodies, six mice were inoculated with the recombinant protein. Following administration of three 50-μg doses of the protein, four of the six mice developed antibodies that cross-reacted with HTLV-I proteins on Western blot. These results indicate that the immune response against the malaria Exp-1 protein may result in HTLV-I-cross-reacting antibodies that can lead to false-positive EIA and indeterminant Western blotting results.     

Detection and differentiation of antibodies to human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II by the immunofluorescence method.

We compared the sensitivities of the prototype human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I)- and HTLV-II-transformed cell lines, MT2 and Mo-T, with that of an HTLV-II-infected cell line, clone 19, established in our laboratory, in the immunofluorescence (IF) test for detection of antibody to HTLV-I and HTLV-II. In addition, IF antibody titers with the three antigens were determined, and the results were compared with HTLV-I and HTLV-II typing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The MT2 cell line was more sensitive than the two HTLV-II cell lines for detecting HTLV-I antibody by IF, and clone 19 was more sensitive than Mo-T or MT2 for measuring HTLV-II antibody. In the titration study, the antigen that gave the highest titer correlated completely with the HTLV type determined by PCR, indicating that the relatively simple IF titration method can be used for differentiating HTLV-I and HTLV-II antibody in sera and plasmas.     

Characterization of antibody reactivity to human T-cell lymphotropic virus types I and II using immunoblot and radioimmunoprecipitation assays.

We have characterized the immunoreactivity to human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) among 26,983 persons of various seroprevalence groups by using enzyme immunoassay, immunoblot (IB), and radioimmunoprecipitation assays (RIPA) in accordance with Public Health Service recommended guidelines for the interpretation of serologic test results for HTLV-I infection. IB-indeterminate serum specimens (n = 178) were reactive to HTLV-I gag proteins, and no serum contained only env reactivity. Overall, RIPA resolved 40% of IB-indeterminate serum samples; however, the probability that RIPA would confirm IB-indeterminate samples depended on the seroprevalence of the population tested. HTLV-I gag p19-only reactivity on IB was not a reliable marker of HTLV-I infection, while gag p24 reactivity on IB was clearly associated with positive seroreactive specimens. IB and RIPA tests did not clearly distinguish between HTLV-I and HTLV-II seroreactivities. These data emphasize that patterns of immunoreactivity to HTLV-I antigens are dependent upon the seroprevalence of the risk groups tested. In addition, RIPA detected antibodies to env proteins present in low titer in a substantial number of IB gag-only reactive sera and resolved the HTLV-I antibody status of these sera.     

Discrimination between human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) infections by using synthetic peptides representing an immunodominant region of the core protein (p19) of HTLV-I and HTLV-II.

We describe enzyme immunoassays that use synthetic oligopeptides to discriminate serologically between human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I and II (HTLV-I and HTLV-II) infections. The peptides represented 20-amino acid segments between residues 111 and 130 (MA1) and residues 116 and 135 (MA2) of the p19 gag proteins of HTLV-I and HTLV-II, respectively. The assays were sensitive since 69 of 74 HTLV-positive sera were reactive to at least one of the two matrix (MA) peptides (sensitivity, 93.2%). By using the ratio of the optical density of MA1 to the optical density of MA2, which represents for every serum sample the ratio between the absorbance value obtained in the MA1 assay and the absorbance value obtained in the MA2 assay, 59 of the 69 reactive serum samples were clearly and easily typed as positive for either antibody to HTLV-I or antibody to HTLV-II. Eight of the 10 remaining reactive serum samples were analyzed further by an inhibition procedure, and their type specificities were then clearly identifiable. Therefore, the results indicate that all MA-reactive sera were serologically distinguished by our peptide assays.     

Evidence for anti-Plasmodium falciparum antibodies that cross-react with human T-lymphotropic virus type I proteins in a population in Irian Jaya, Indonesia.

This study was performed to demonstrate the presence of anti-Plasmodium falciparum antibodies in a population living in Irian Jaya, Indonesia that cross-react with human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) proteins. Serum samples from 63 volunteers living in Oksibil, a secluded highland valley in Irian Jaya, were tested for anti-P. falciparum antibodies by an immunofluorescence assay and for anti-HTLV-I antibodies by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). All samples were positive for anti-P. falciparum antibodies at titers of > or = 1:256. Twenty-four samples were reactive by EIA for HTLV-I, and of these, 23 were tested by western blotting (immunoblotting). Five of the 23 samples were classified as western blot positive and 18 were classified as western blot indeterminate. In competitive blocking assays with malaria proteins, western blot immunoreactivity to all HTLV-I Gag proteins was either reduced or eliminated. Significant reductions in the HTLV-I EIA optical density values of the Oksibil sera occurred when the sera were competitively blocked with the malaria antigens. The optical density values of HTLV-I-positive control sera showed no significant change. Competitive blocking with HTLV-I antigens produced reductions in the optical density values of both the Oksibil sera and the HTLV-I-positive control sera. These data suggest that in this population, anti-P. falciparum antibodies are cross-reactive with HTLV-I proteins in the western blot and EIA tests.     

Oral fluid as a specimen for detection and confirmation of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1.

Paired serum and oral fluid specimens (n = 287) were collected with the Omni-Sal device and were assayed for the presence of antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs)--Abbott 3A11, an Organon Teknika Corporation research-use-only test, and the Murex GACELISA--were used per the manufacturers' inserts or were modified slightly to accommodate the oral fluid specimens. Compared with serum Western blot (immunoblot) results, each EIA had a sensitivity of 100% and the specificities were 89.6% for the Abbott 3A11 EIA, 96.5% for the GACELISA, and 97.8% for the Organon Teknika Corporation EIA. Specificities based on specimens that were repeatedly reactive were 99.3% for all EIAs. A miniaturized Western blot technique used for confirmatory testing of both the serum and oral fluid specimens found 149 of the 287 samples to be HIV-1 antibody positive in both sample types. The Western blot banding patterns observed for the serum and oral fluid specimens were essentially identical. Immunoglobulin G concentrations were determined for all oral fluid specimens and ranged from < 0.5 to > 40.0 micrograms/ml. Immunoglobulin G concentrations did not correlate with the ability of any of the EIAs to detect HIV-1-specific antibody or with the ability of the modified Western blot to detect HIV-1 protein-specific antibodies.     

Prevalence of human T-cell leukemia virus types I and II in Switzerland

The retroviruses human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1/2 and human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV)-I/II share modes of transmission, suggesting that efforts to monitor the current HIV-1 epidemic in Switzerland should be complemented by assessment of HTLV-I/II prevalence. This study presents an updated evaluation of HTLV-I/II infection among groups within the Swiss population polarized towards either low or increased risk of infection. Archived serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were examined for evidence of HTLV-I/II infection by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA), type-specific Western blot, type-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR), DNA sequence analysis, and virus culture. Among blood donations obtained from low-risk Swiss donors, we report a complete lack of HTLV-II infection and the occurrence of HTLV-I infection limited to a prevalence of 0.079 per 100,000 (1/1,266,466). Among high-risk HIV-positive persons and HIV-negative persons at increased risk of HIV-infection, we report a focus of HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection at prevalence rates of 62 per 100,000 (1/1,620) and 309 per 100,000 (5/1,620), respectively. The finding of low HTLV-I/II prevalence among Swiss blood donors and containment of HTLV-I/II infection within known risk-groups does not support initiation of HTLV-I/II screening for Swiss blood, tissue, and organ donations.