Gabapentin (Neurontin) as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Partial Seizures: A Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

Summary: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin, GBP) as add-on therapy in 272 patients with refractory partial seizures who were receiving one to two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Efficacy assessments compared the frequency of partial seizures during the 12-week treatment phase (T) and the 12-week baseline period (B). The primary analysis compared data for patients receiving GBP 900 mg/day with placebo; the GBP 1,200-mglday group provided doseresponse data. Efficacy criteria were percentage of change in seizure frequency (PCH), responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), and response ratio, where RRatio = (T B)/(T + B). Median PCH was–21.8% in the 900-mg/day group and ?17.8% in the 1,200-mg/day group as compared with ?0.3% in the placebo group. Responder rate was 22.9% in the 900-mg/day group and 10.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.020, Fisher's exact test). Adjusted mean Rratio was-0.136 in the 900-mg/day group and ?0.025 in the placebo group (p = 0.0046, analysis of variance ANOVA). Results showed slightly greater improvement for the 1,20-mg/day than for the 900-mg/day group (RRatio =?0.157, responder rate 28.0%). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 69% of patients in the 900-mg/day group and in 64% in the 1,200-mg/day group as compared with 52% in patients receiving placebo as add-on therapy. The most frequent AE among patients treated with GBP were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Clinical laboratory evaluations showed no clinically important trends and no evidence of hepatic or hematopoietic effects. GBP is safe and effective in treating some patients with refractory partial seizures.     

Gabapentin as Add-On Therapy in Children with Refractory Partial Seizures: A 12-Week, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years. METHODS: After a 6-week baseline period, 247 patients (54 centres) entered a 12-week double-blind phase and were randomized to receive either GBP (t.i.d., titrated to 23-35 mg/kg/ day) or placebo. Seizure activity and type were recorded daily. Efficacy variables included Response Ratio (RRatio), responder rate, and percentage change in frequency (PCH) for all partial seizures; PCH and RRatio for individual types of partial seizures; and investigator and parent/guardian global assessments of seizure frequency and patient well-being. RESULTS: RRatio for all partial seizures was significantly lower (better) for GBP-treated patients (p = 0.0407). Responder rate favored GBP, but the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Median PCH for all partial seizures for the GBP treatment group (-17.0%) was better than that for the placebo group (-6.5%). Median PCH for specific seizure types showed GBP to be most effective in controlling complex partial seizures (-35%) and secondarily generalized seizures (-28%) when compared with placebo (-12%, +13%, respectively). A greater percentage of GBP-treated patients exhibited improvement according to investigator and parent/guardian global assessments, with a statistically significant difference observed in the parent/guardian global assessment of seizure-frequency reduction (p = 0.046). Three GBP patients and one placebo patient were seizure free during the double-blind treatment period. GBP was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: GBP was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for partial seizures in paediatric patients with previously drug-resistant seizures.     

Gabapentin as Add-on Therapy for Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Results of Five Placebo-Controlled Trials

Summary: Gabapentin (GBP, Neurontin), a new antiepi-leptic drug (AED) with a novel mechanism of action, exhibits low acute toxicity in mice, rats, and monkeys, and is not teratogenic. GBP pharmacokinetics are simple and predictable; GBP is eliminated by urinary excretion, is not protein-bound or metabolized, does not induce or inhibit hepatic enzymes, and does not interact with other AEDs. In five placebo-controlled, double-blind studies of GBP as add-on therapy, 307 patients with refractory partial seizures received placebo and 485 received GBP dosages of 600, 900, 1,200, or 1.800 mg/day for 12 weeks following a 12-week baseline. Seizure frequency, as measured by response ratio and responder rate, was improved for patients receiving GBP compared with placebo; differences were statistically significant in two of the three large, multicenter studies. Adverse events occurred in 76% of GBP-treated patients, compared with 57% of placebo-treated patients. No serious adverse events were consistently attributable to GBP therapy. Changes in clinical laboratory values were not considered clinically important. GBP represents a significant addition to the armamentarium of AEDs available for treatment of patients with epilepsy.     

Conversion to High Dose Gabapentin Monotherapy in Patients with Medically Refractory Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of high dose gabapentin (GBP) monotherapy (3,0004,800 mg/ day) in patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy.
Methods: GBP monotherapy at daily doses up to 4,800 mg was attempted in patients participating in the open-label phase of a double-blind, dose-controlled, GBP monotherapy trial. For those who achieved monotherapy, the types and severity of adverse events were assessed and the average seizure frequency per 28 days while maintained on the highest daily GBP dose was compared to the seizure frequency during the baseline phase of the double blind trial. Correlation analysis between GBP serum level, total daily dose, and percentage of seizure change from baseline was performed.
Results: A total of 45 patients participated in the open-label phase of the trial and 23 (51%) were converted successfully to GBP monotherapy. In those patients, the average daily gabapentin dose was 3,900 mg and the mean length of follow-up was 252 days. Compared to baseline, there was a mean reduction of 54%, 43%, and 14% for simple partial, complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures respectively, while maintained on high-dose GBP monotherapy. A significant linear correlation between daily GBP dosage (2,4004,800 mg) and resultant mean serum levels was found (r = 0.51; p < 0.01). There was no significant correlation between seizure frequency and total daily GBP dose or with serum levels. High-dose GBP monotherapy was well tolerated; only one patient exited the trial because of adverse events. The most common adverse event was tiredness/sleepiness and was not dose-related.
Conclusions: GBP monotherapy is well tolerated in daily doses of up to 4,800 mg and is effective in a subgroup of patients with medically refractory partial epilepsy.     

Randomized controlled trial of zonisamide for the treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures.

BACKGROUND: Zonisamide is a sulfonamide antiepilepsy drug with sodium and calcium channel-blocking actions. Experience in Japan and a previous European double-blind study have demonstrated its efficacy against partial-onset seizures. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 203 patients was conducted at 20 United States sites to assess zonisamide efficacy and dose response as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures. Zonisamide dosages were elevated by 100 mg/d each week. The study design allowed parallel comparisons with placebo for three dosages and a final crossover to 400 mg/d of zonisamide for all patients. The primary efficacy comparison was change in seizure frequency from a 4-week placebo baseline to weeks 8 through 12 on blinded therapy. RESULTS: At 400 mg/d, zonisamide reduced the median frequency of all seizures by 40.5% from baseline, compared with a 9% reduction (p = 0.0009) with placebo treatment, and produced a > or =50% seizure reduction (responder rate) in 42% of patients. A dosage of 100 mg/d produced a 20.5% reduction in median seizure frequency (p = 0.038 compared with placebo) and a dosage of 200 mg/d produced a 24.7% reduction in median seizure frequency (p = 0.004 compared with placebo). Dropouts from adverse events (10%) did not differ from placebo (8.2%, NS). The only adverse event differing significantly from placebo was weight loss, though somnolence, anorexia, and ataxia were slightly more common with zonisamide treatment. Serum zonisamide concentrations rose with increasing dose. CONCLUSION: Zonisamide is effective and well tolerated as an adjunctive agent for refractory partial-onset seizures. The minimal effective dosage was 100 mg/d, but 400 mg/d was the most effective dosage.     

Limited efficacy of gabapentin in severe therapy-resistant epilepsies of learning-disabled patients

Knowledge on the effects of gabapentin (GBP) in learning disabled patients is limited. The objective of this study was to assess antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of GBP in routine therapy. A retrospective open observational study design was applied. Twenty-nine consecutive residential patients with simple and/or complex partial seizures with or without secondary generalization and with different degrees of learning disability were included. All patients had severe therapy-resistant epilepsy. GBP was administered as add-on therapy. Dosages were progressively increased up to 1600-2400 mg/day (in a number of cases up to 4800 mg/day), in accordance with clinical requirements. The seizure frequency was recorded and compared between a baseline and a treatment period (after 3 months of titration) of 3 months duration each.Only three patients (10.3%) had a reduction of their seizure frequency by 50% or more. No patient became seizure-free. Unwanted side effects, mostly mild and dose-dependent, occurred in 37.9% of all patients. Somnolence and ataxia were the most frequently observed unwanted effects. In two cases hyperphagia/weight increase, and in two other cases edema occurred.We conclude the efficacy of GBP in learning disabled patients with highly therapy-resistant partial seizures is limited.     

Efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate as adjunctive treatment in adults with refractory partial-onset seizures: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III study

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in adults with ≥4 partial‐onset seizures (simple or complex, with or without secondary generalization) per 4 weeks despite treatment with 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: This multicenter, parallel‐group study had an 8‐week, single‐blind, placebo baseline phase, after which patients were randomized to placebo (n = 102) or once‐daily ESL 400 mg (n = 100), 800 mg (n = 98), or 1,200 mg (n = 102) in the double‐blind treatment phase. ESL starting dose was 400 mg; thereafter, ESL was titrated at weekly 400‐mg steps to the full maintenance dose (12 weeks). Results: Seizure frequency adjusted per 4 weeks over the maintenance period (primary endpoint) was significantly lower than placebo in the ESL 1,200‐mg (p = 0.0003) and 800‐mg (p = 0.0028) groups [analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) of log‐transformed seizure frequency]. Responder rate was 20% (placebo), 23% (400 mg), 34% (800 mg), and 43% (1,200 mg). Median relative reduction in seizure frequency was 16% (placebo), 26% (400 mg), 36% (800 mg), and 45% (1,200 mg). The most frequent concomitant AEDs were carbamazepine (56–62% of patients), lamotrigine (25–27%), and valproic acid (22–28%). Similar efficacy results were obtained in patients administered ESL with or without carbamazepine as concomitant AED. Discontinuation rates caused by adverse events (AEs) were 3.9% (placebo), 4% (400 mg), 8.2% (800 mg), and 19.6% (1,200 mg). AEs in >10% of any group were dizziness, headache, and diplopia. Most AEs were mild or moderate. Discussion: ESL, 800 and 1,200 mg once‐daily, was well tolerated and more effective than placebo in patients who were refractory to treatment with one or two concomitant AEDs.     

Gabapentin add-on treatment: how many patients become seizure-free?: An open-label multicenter study

The aim of the study was to find out the percentage of patients with localization-related epilepsy achieving complete seizure control with gabapentin (GBP) add-on therapy. Patients under anti-epileptic drug monotherapy during 8 weeks baseline (BSL) with 6 or more seizures were treated with GBP for 26 weeks up to 2400 mg/day. Patients obtaining complete seizure control of all seizures or any partial seizure type during the last 8 weeks were calculated. Seizure frequency was compared between BSL and last 8 weeks. In all, 110 patients were enrolled (92 completed, 18 discontinued): mean age of the completers: 37.6 years (range 16–72), median seizure frequency per 28 days at BSL: 6.8 (2.5–24.5), mean duration of epilepsy: 17.6 years (0.2–51.4), mean duration with GBP for completers: 182.8 days (144–187). Complete seizure control of all seizures was achieved in 8.7% of patients (simple partial seizures: 13.3%, complex partial seizures 24.3%, secondarily generalized seizures: 61.5%): 38% of the patients became seizure-free in at least 1 seizure-type; 40% experienced adverse events. Assessment for quality of life (QoL) and trough plasma levels of GBP did not correlate with the good effect of GBP.     

Gabapentin and cognition: a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled study in refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of different doses of gabapentin (GBP) on cognitive function in treated epileptic patients. METHODS: Twenty seven patients with refractory partial seizures commenced a double blind, dose ranging, placebo controlled, crossover study of adjuvant GBP. Each treatment phase lasted three months, during which the dose of GBP or matched placebo was increased stepwise at intervals of four weeks (1200 mg/day, 1800 mg/day, and 2400 mg/day in three daily doses). Psychomotor and memory testing was carried out at the end of each four week period, at which time the patient also completed subjective measures of cognition, fatigue, worry, temper, and dysphoria. A visual analogue scale was used to assess drowsiness and a questionnaire was employed to gauge the severity of side effects. RESULTS: In the 21 patients completing the study, GBP produced a significant reduction in median monthly seizure frequency from 7 to 4.3 (P = 0.02), the decrease being most pronounced for secondarily generalised seizures (from 1.0 to 0.3, P = 0.01). Forty three per cent of patients reported a reduction in seizure frequency of at least 50% throughout all GBP doses. Mean (SD) plasma concentrations of GBP at 1200, 1800, and 2400 mg/day were 4.7 (2.6), 6.8 (3.8), and 8.6 (3.3) mg/l respectively. The drug had no effect on composite psychomotor and memory scores; nor was there alteration in any self assessment subscore. The mean drowsiness (P = 0.03) score was higher during treatment with 2400 mg GBP daily compared with matched placebo. Composite psychomotor (r = -0.47, P < 0.01), tiredness (r = 0.42, P < 0.01), and side effect (r = 0.61, P < 0.001) scores correlated significantly with seizure frequency but not with GBP dose. CONCLUSION: GBP is a well tolerated and effective antiepileptic drug which had no measurable effect on cognition but did produce sedation at the highest dose. This study also supports the suggestion that seizures can cause cognitive impairment.     

Oxcarbazepine placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a broad oxcarbazepine (OXC) dosage range (600, 1200, and 2400 mg/d) as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial seizures and to determine the relationship between trough plasma 10-monohydroxy derivative concentrations and OXC safety and efficacy. METHODS: This multinational, multicenter, randomized, 28-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-arm, parallel-group trial enrolled 694 patients aged 15-65 years with uncontrolled partial seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures. The primary efficacy variable was percentage change in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to baseline. RESULTS: The median reduction in seizure frequency was 26%, 40%, 50%, or 8% for patients receiving 600, 1200, or 2400 mg/d OXC or placebo, respectively (all p < or = 0.0001). Of patients in the 600, 1200, or 2400 mg/d OXC groups, 27%, 42%, and 50% respectively, had more than 50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with 13% for placebo (all p < 0.001). Higher plasma 10-monohydroxy derivative concentrations were associated with larger decreases in seizure frequency (p = 0.0001). During the double-blind treatment phase, 84%, 90%, 98%, and 76% of patients receiving 600, 1200, or 2400 mg/d OXC or placebo, respectively, reported one or more adverse events. The most common adverse events were related to the nervous and digestive systems. CONCLUSIONS: OXC is safe and effective as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial seizures. OXC 600 mg/d was the minimum effective dosage; effectiveness of OXC increased with dose. The rapid and fixed titration to high doses was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, which could potentially be reduced by adjusting concomitant antiepileptic medication and by using a slower, flexible OXC titration schedule.     

Efficacy and safety of Losigamone in partial seizures: a randomized double-blind study

The objective of the study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of two different dosages of Losigamone (LSG) in add-on treatment of partial seizures. In a multi-center, double-blind, randomized clinical trial, patients received one of three 12-week treatments: placebo, LSG 1200 mg/day, or 1500 mg/day, in addition to up to three standard anticonvulsants after a prospective period of 12 weeks to assess baseline seizure frequency. The primary efficacy measure was the relative reduction of seizure frequency per 4 weeks in the double-blind phase as compared to baseline. In the intention-to-treat population of 264 patients, the relative median reduction of partial seizure frequency was 3.3% for placebo, 19.7% for LSG 1200 mg/day, and 25.3% for LSG 1500 mg/day. The differences of both LSG groups versus placebo were significant (P<0.01, two-tailed). In the responder analysis, 11.8% of the patients in the placebo group, 17.2% in the LSG 1200 mg/day group, and 29.3% in the LSG 1500 mg/day group showed a seizure reduction versus baseline of at least 50%. A positive association between dosage and response was observed (P=0.003). Adverse events during treatment were reported by 58.8% of the patients for placebo, by 62.1% for LSG 1200 mg/day and by 76.1% for LSG 1500 mg/day. Most events in the LSG groups occurred during the first 4 weeks of double-blind (during or immediately after up-titration) and subsided quickly. Over the last 4 weeks of treatment, the incidence of adverse events in the LSG groups was close to the placebo level. Based on the study's results, LSG is an effective and safe add-on drug for refractory partial epilepsy in adults.     

Gabapentin versus lamotrigine monotherapy: a double-blind comparison in newly diagnosed epilepsy

PURPOSE: This randomised, double-blind study compared the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) gabapentin (GBP) and lamotrigine (LTG) as monotherapy in newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: Patients with partial seizures with and/or without secondary generalization or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either GBP or LTG. During 2- and 6-week titration periods, respectively, GBP dosage reached 1,800 mg/day, and LTG, 150 mg/day. In the subsequent 24-week maintenance phase, the dose could be adjusted based on seizure control or adverse events between 1,200 and 3,600 mg/day for GBP and 100 and 300 mg/day for LTG. The primary end point was time to exit, a composite of efficacy and tolerability. Evaluable patients were used for the primary efficacy analysis, whereas tolerability was examined on an intent-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients was randomized, and 291 (148 GBP, 143 LTG) were included in the evaluable population. Nineteen patients in each group had an exit event. The median time to exit was 69 days for GBP and 48 days for LTG. The hazard ratio was estimated as 1.043 (90% confidence intervals, 0.602-1.809). Overall, 106 (71.6% of the evaluable population) GBP-treated and 96 (67.1%) LTG-treated patients completed the study. Of those, 80 (75.5%) patients taking GBP and 73 (76.0%) taking LTG remained seizure free during the final 12 weeks of treatment. Only 14 (8.9%) GBP-treated patients and 15 (9.9%) LTG-treated patients withdrew because of study drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: GBP and LTG monotherapy were similarly effective and well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of gabapentin (neurontin) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures

In an international, multicenter, open-label study, the long-term efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP, Neurontin) as add-on therapy were investigated in 203 patients with partial seizures refractory to standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). All patients enrolled in this study had experienced improved seizure control with GBP in one of four previous, short-term studies. Patients received mean GBP dosages of 1,283 to 2,220 mg/day for periods of ⩽1,894 days (mean, 385 days). For purposes of efficacy analyses, data were divided into 12-week treatment periods. During long-term treatment, the efficacy of GBP was shown to be maintained by several primary efficacy measures. In all of the 12-week treatment periods, the percentage of change in seizure frequency from baseline was equal to or less than −24%, responder rate was >35%, and response ratio ranged between −0.2 and −0.338. Results for secondary efficacy measures also indicated that efficacy was maintained. The favorable safety profile of GBP also was maintained during long-term treatment. Our results suggest that GBP is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated add-on treatment for long-term use in patients with partial seizures refractory to standard AEDs.     

Adjuvant Vigabatrin in Refractory Epilepsy: A Ceiling to Effective Dosage in Individual Patients?

A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study of additional vigabatrin (γ-vinyl-GABA, VGB, 1.0 g twice daily for 6 weeks, followed by 1.5 g twice daily for 6 weeks) and matched placebo was undertaken in 24 patients with refractory epilepsy. Nineteen completed the trial satisfactorily. Fewer seizure days were reported during VGB treatment [placebo 41, VGB 23, p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) ?1.5 to ?14]. An overall reduction in median seizure numbers failed to reach statistical significance (n = 19; placebo 52, VGB 32, NS, 95% CI ?18 to + 24). Subgroup analysis, however, showed a significant reduction in partial seizures (n = 17) with 2 g VGB daily (placebo 22, VGB 13, p < 0.05, 95% CI ?0.5 to ?16.5), but not with higher dosage (placebo 28, VGB 22, NS, 95% CI ? 18 to + 11). A deterioration in control of partial seizures as compared with the equivalent placebo phase was observed when patients were changed from 2 to 3 g/day VGB (2 g VGB 13, 3 g VGB 22, p = 0.05, 95% CI 0 to +20). Loss of efficacy was noted in 3 patients, and seizure control worsened slightly in 5 others. One previously resistant patient developed a therapeutic response, and 2 other patients reported an additional useful reduction in seizures. In the remaining 8 patients, seizure frequency did not change. VGB did not appear to benefit tonic-clonic seizures. Serum VGB concentrations were higher during treatment with 3 g (15.5 ± 8.9 mg/L) daily than with 2 g (13.5 ± 11.2 mg/L). No important alterations were noted in the concentrations of concomitantly administered antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) throughout the trial. VGB is useful adjuvant therapy for treatment of partial seizures. There may be a ceiling to effective dosage. This demands individual dose titration for each patient.     

Treatment of partial seizures with gabapentin: double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study

This double-blind study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin 1200 mg/day and 1800 mg/day (t.i.d.) compared to placebo as an adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy. Patients were included when they had partial seizures at least eight times during a 12-week baseline period despite treatment with one to two antiepileptic drugs. After baseline, eligible patients were randomized to gabapentin 1200 mg/day, 1800 mg/day, or placebo for 12-week treatment. The primary end-point, response ratio, was derived from seizure frequencies during treatment and baseline period based upon the seizure daily record by a patient. Of the 209 randomized patients, 86 received gabapentin 1200 mg/day, 41 received gabapentin 1800 mg/day, and 82 received placebo. A statistically significant difference was found between each of the two gabapentin groups and placebo for the primary efficacy end-point, response ratio (P < 0.005) with definite dose-response (P < 0.001). More gabapentin patients reported moderate to marked improvement in seizure frequency and intensity/duration of each seizure than placebo patients. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by approximately 65% of patients receiving gabapentin compared to approximately 46% of patients receiving placebo; somnolence and dizziness were the most common events. Gabapentin 1200 mg/day and 1800 mg/day significantly reduced the frequency of refractory seizures compared to placebo. Favorable tolerability of gabapentin was confirmed also in a Japanese population, consistent with previous global studies.     

Evaluation of adjunctive perampanel in patients with refractory partial‐onset seizures: Results of randomized global phase III study 305

Purpose: To assess the efficacy and safety of once‐daily doses of perampanel 8 and 12 mg when added to 1–3 concomitantly administered, approved antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial‐onset seizures. Methods: Study 305 was a multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in patients aged 12 years and older with ongoing seizures despite prior therapy with at least two AEDs, and currently receiving 1–3 AEDs. Equal randomization to once‐daily oral perampanel 8 or 12 mg, or placebo was performed. Patients entered a 19‐week double‐blind treatment phase comprising a 6‐week titration period, with weekly 2‐mg dose increments, followed by a 13‐week maintenance period. Primary efficacy end points were the responder rate (proportion of patients who had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency during treatment per 28 days relative to baseline), and the percent change in seizure frequency per 28 days relative to pre‐perampanel baseline. A secondary end point was percent change in the frequency of complex partial plus secondarily generalized seizures. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the study. Key Findings: Three hundred eighty‐six patients were randomized and treated with study medication. Of these, 321 patients completed the study. The 50% responder rates (intent‐to‐treat analysis) were 14.7%, 33.3%, and 33.9%, respectively, for placebo, perampanel 8 mg, and perampanel 12 mg, with significant improvements over placebo for both perampanel 8 mg (p = 0.002) and 12 mg (p < 0.001). The median percent change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days (intent‐to‐treat analysis) was ?9.7%, ?30.5%, and ?17.6% for placebo, 8 mg, and 12 mg, respectively, with significant reductions compared with placebo for both 8 mg (p < 0.001) and 12 mg (p = 0.011). For complex partial seizures plus partial seizures that secondarily generalized, the median percent change in frequency was ?32.7% (8 mg), ?21.9 (12 mg), and ?8.1% (placebo), with significant reductions for both 8 mg (p < 0.001) and 12 mg (p = 0.005). The most frequent (occurring in ≥10% of patients in any treatment group) treatment‐emergent AEs were dizziness, somnolence, fatigue, and headache, with an apparent dose effect suggested for all except headache. Significance: This phase III trial demonstrated that adjunctive treatment with once‐daily perampanel at 8 mg and 12 mg was effective in improving seizure control in patients 12 years and older with refractory partial‐onset seizures. These study results also demonstrated that once‐daily doses of 8 mg and 12 mg were safe and acceptably tolerated in this study. Perampanel demonstrated a favorable risk/benefit ratio in this population.     

Dose-dependent safety and efficacy of zonisamide: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with refractory partial seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory localization-related epilepsy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive ZNS in 351 patients with refractory partial seizures receiving a stable regimen of one to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients were randomized to placebo or ZNS, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 500 mg/day (2:1:1:2) after a 12-week baseline. Dose titration was undertaken over a 6-week titration phase, which was followed by an 18-week fixed-dose assessment phase. Primary efficacy parameters were the differences between ZNS, 500 mg/day, and placebo in the change from baseline in frequency of complex partial (CP) seizures during the fixed-dose assessment phase and in the proportion of CP responders (> or =50% decrease from baseline in seizure frequency). Safety and tolerability also were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the highest dose of ZNS (500 mg/day) resulted in a significantly greater decrease in CP seizure frequency from baseline (51.2% vs. 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher proportion of CP responders (52.3% vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001). Both ZNS, 500 mg/day, and 300 mg/day were statistically superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of "all seizures" and simple partial (SP) + CP seizures. For all seizures, a significant dose-response relation was observed (p < 0.0001).The most common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, and nausea during the titration phase and headache and pharyngitis during the fixed-dose assessment phase. CONCLUSIONS: ZNS provides dose-dependent, effective, and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.     

Gabapentin in childhood epilepsy: a prospective evaluation of efficacy and safety

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (GBP) in partial epilepsy in children. METHODS: We performed a prospective open label add-on study in 52 children and adolescents (age 1.8-17.5 years, mean 11.1 years) with refractory partial seizures. Gabapentin was added to one other baseline drug and the efficacy was rated according to seizure type and frequency. RESULTS: The GBP dose ranged from 26 to 78 mg/kg per day (mean 52 mg/kg per day) and was well tolerated in most patients. The seizure frequency remained unchanged in 34 patients (65%). We saw a provocation of seizures in three children (6%). Initially 15 patients (29%) benefited from GBP: five (10%) with a seizure reduction of 50-74%, seven (13%) with a reduction of 75-99% and three (6%) became seizure free. All but three experienced a development of tolerance within the next weeks to months. CONCLUSIONS: Although gabapentin seems also to be safe in children, the efficacy in refractory partial seizures was disappointing.     

AUStralian Study of Titration to Effect Profile of Safety (AUS-STEPS): High-Dose Gabapentin (Neurontin) in Partial Seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and impact on quality of life of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: AUS-STEPS was an open-label, multicenter, prospective study in patients experiencing partial seizures who were inadequately controlled with one to three concurrent antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). GBP treatment was titrated to a maximum of 4,800 mg/day, over a treatment period of 24 weeks, to achieve an efficacious and tolerable dosage. Efficacy was assessed by seizure-frequency data. Quality of life was evaluated by using the QOLIE-10 questionnaire, and safety was assessed by adverse-event reports and clinical laboratory findings. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients received treatment with GBP, with 174 evaluable for intention-to-treat (ITT) efficacy analysis. A reduction of >50% in overall seizure frequency was observed in 93 patients (53%). There was a small (4.6%) overall improvement in QOLIE-10 score. The most frequent adverse events were dizziness (31%), fatigue (29%), somnolence (27%), headache (21%), and ataxia (20%), with no major increase seen in adverse events necessitating discontinuation as the dose of GBP was titrated upward. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that patients with partial epilepsy may be effectively treated with GBP at dosages of < or =4,800 mg/day, without altering the safety profile of the drug.     

Multicenter double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levetiracetam as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV, Keppra) as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, LEV (500 or 1,000 mg twice daily) was compared with placebo as add-on therapy in 324 patients with uncontrolled simple or complex partial seizures, or both, with or without secondary generalization. After enrollment, three parallel groups were assessed during a baseline period of 8 or 12 weeks, followed by a 4-week titration interval and a 12-week evaluation period. RESULTS: LEV significantly decreased partial seizure frequency compared with placebo. A reduction in seizure frequency of > or =50% occurred in 22.8% of patients in the 1,000-mg group and 31.6% of patients in the 2,000-mg group, compared with 10.4% of patients in the placebo group. Administration of LEV did not affect plasma concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs or alter vital signs or laboratory parameters. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was observed between treatment groups (70.8% for the 1,000-mg group and 75.5% for the 2,000-mg group), or between the LEV and placebo groups (73.2% for placebo group). The most commonly reported adverse effects in the LEV group were asthenia, headache, and somnolence. CONCLUSIONS: The antiepileptic efficacy and tolerability of LEV (1,000 mg/d and 2,000 mg/d, administered in two divided doses) as add-on therapy was established in patients with refractory partial seizures in this clinical study.